Next Article in Journal
A Solitary Wave-Based Sensor to Monitor the Setting of Fresh Concrete
Previous Article in Journal
Augmented Switching Linear Dynamical System Model for Gas Concentration Estimation with MOX Sensors in an Open Sampling System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Characterization of a Mg2+-Selective Fluorescent Probe

1
Laboratory of Environmental Monitoring, School of Tropical and Laboratory Medicine, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 571101, China
2
Faculty of Laboratory Medicine, School of Tropical and Laboratory Medicine, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 571199, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2014, 14(7), 12560-12567; https://doi.org/10.3390/s140712560
Submission received: 19 June 2014 / Revised: 7 July 2014 / Accepted: 8 July 2014 / Published: 11 July 2014
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical Sensors)

Abstract

: A new Mg2+-selective fluorescent probe P was synthesized and characterized. With optimal conditions, the proposed probe P showed good selectivity to Mg2+ compared to other common metal ions, and worked in a wide linear range of 5.0 × 10−7–6.0 × 10−6 M with a detection limit of 1.7 × 10−7 M Mg2+ in ethanol-water solution (9:1, v/v, 20 mM HEPES, pH = 10.0).

1. Introduction

The magnesium ion (Mg2+) is the most abundant divalent cation in living cells, and participates in many important cellular processes, such as ion channel regulation, DNA and protein synthesis, membrane stabilization and cytoskeletal function [1,2]. Moreover, dietary deficiency of Mg2+ appears to play an etiological role in many diseases [3], thus, Mg2+ sensors are extensively required [4].

In recent years, different kinds of Mg2+-responsive fluorescent probes containing receptor groups based on moieties including crown ethers [2,4,5], calix[4]arenes [6], diketones [7,8], porphyrins [9] and imine-like aromatics [1015] have been developed, and some of them are commercially available [16,17], but compared to the success of Ca2+-selective probes [18], the design of highly selective Mg2+ fluorescence probes is still an intriguing challenge. In this paper, we developed a compound by inserting an atomic spacer group between the carbon hydrazone coordinating sites to produce helicates with larger internal cavities, and thoroughly studied the affinity effect of coordination sites on Mg2+ selectivity (Scheme 1).

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Reagents and Instruments

All reagents and solvents are of analytical grade and used without further purification. The metal ions employed are NaCl, KCl, CaCl2·2H2O, MgCl2·6H2O, Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, PbCl2, CdCl2, CrCl3·6H2O, CoCl2·6H2O, NiCl2·6H2O, HgCl2, CuCl2·2H2O, FeCl3·6H2O and AgNO3, respectively.

Fluorescence emission spectra were conducted on a Hitachi 4600 spectrofluorimeter. UV-Vis spectra were obtained on a Hitachi U-2910 spectrophotometer. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were measured with a Bruker AV 400 instrument and chemical shifts are given in ppm from tetramethylsilane (TMS). Mass (MS) spectra were recorded on a Thermo TSQ Quantum Access Agillent 1100 system.

2.2. Synthesis of Compound P

Compound 1 (1.0 mmol) and 2 (1.0 mmol) were stirred in ethanol (30 mL) at 80 °C for 6 h, and then cooled to room temperature. The precipitate so obtained was filtered and dried under vacuum and used directly. Yields: 87.6%. MS (ES+) m/z: 257.33 [M+H]+, 279.23 [M+Na]+. 1H-NMR (δ ppm, DMSO-d6): 12.05 (s, 1H), 11.79 (s, 1H), 11.22 (s, 1H), 8.69 (s, 1H), 7.91 (d, 1H, J = 7.40 Hz), 7.58 (d, 1H, J = 7.40 Hz), 7.46 (t, 1H, J = 7.38 Hz), 7.33 (t, 1H, J = 7.32 Hz), 7.00 (d, 1H, J = 8.12 Hz), 6.97 (d, 1H, J = 7.76 Hz), 6.95 (d, 1H, J = 4.52 Hz), 6.93 (d, 1H, J = 7.64 Hz). 13C-NMR (δ ppm, DMSO-d6): 165.43, 159.93, 158.43, 149.93, 134.88, 132.52, 130.40, 129.48, 120.30, 119.93, 119.53, 118.21, 117.36, 116.53.

2.3. General Spectroscopic Methods

Metal ions and probe P were dissolved in deionized water and DMSO to obtain 1.0 mM stock solutions, respectively. Before spectroscopic measurements, the solution was freshly prepared by diluting the high concentration stock solution to the corresponding desired concentration. For all measurements, excitation and emission slit widths were 10 nm, excitation wavelength was 385 nm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Effects of pH on P and P with Mg2+

A pH titration experiment was performed first to investigate a suitable pH range for the sensing of probe P to Mg2+. As shown in Figure 1, the emission intensities of the free probe P can be negligible in the range pH 4–11. After the addition of Mg2+ to the solution of probe P in the range of pH 4–11, the emission intensity at 460 nm rapidly increased to a maximum. For pH values smaller than 8.0, the emission intensity was significantly less than that for the high pH values, indicating poor stability of the Mg2+-P complexes at low pH. The pH-control emission measurements revealed that probe P showed the best respond to Mg2+ at pH 10.0. Therefore, further UV-vis and fluorescent studies were carried out in ethanol-water solution (9:1, v:v, 20 mM HEPES, pH 10.0).

3.2. UV-vis Spectral Response of P

The addition of Mg2+ to the solution of P (10 μM) in ethanol-water solution (9:1, v:v, 20 mM HEPES, pH 10.0) caused an obvious spectra change in the UV region (Figure 2). This result in absorbance clearly suggested the binding of P with Mg2+. The new band at 395 nm suggested that Mg2+ binding with chemosensor P blocks conjugation between the double bonds, resulting in a longer absorption wavelength.

During Mg2+ titration with P, a significant decrease of absorption intensity at 327 nm and an increase of absorption band centered at 395 nm were observed with an isosbestic point at 356 nm, which indicated a clear ratiometric absoption change (Figure 3). These results indicated that P can function as an absorption ratiometric chemosensor for Mg2+ in aqueous media.

3.3. Fluorescence Spectral Response of P

To further evaluate the selectivity of probe P, the fluorescence spectra (Excitation wavelength was 385 nm) of P (10 μM) were investigated in ethanol-water solution (9:1, v:v, 20 mM HEPES, pH 10.0) with the addition of respective metal ions (100 μM) (Figure 4). Study showed that compared to other ions examined, only Mg2+ generated a significant “turn-on” fluorescence response of the monomeric peak at 460 nm with a fluorescence enhancement up to 56-fold. These results suggested that P had a higher selectivity toward Mg2+ than the other metal ions.

To further investigate the interaction of Mg2+ and P, a fluorescence titration experiment was carried out. The result showed that the fluorescence intensity of P was enhanced upon addition of various amounts of Mg2+ in ethanol-water solution (9:1, v:v, 20 mM HEPES, pH 10.0) as depicted in Figure 5. Under the present conditions, when P was employed at 10 μM level, the fluorescent intensity of P was proportional to the concentration of Mg2+ in the range of 1.3 × 10−6 to 1.0 × 10−5 M with a detection limit of 4.2 × 10−7 M Mg2+. This clearly demonstrated that probe P could sensitively detect environmentally relevant levels of Mg2+.

3.4. The Proposed Reaction Mechanism

To study the reaction mechanism of P with Mg2+, the Job's plot experiment was carried out, and the result indicated that a P-Mg2+ complex was formed in 1:1 stoichiometry (Figure 6).

Thus, according to the obtained results, the reaction mechanism between P and Mg2+ was proposed. The probe P was most likely to chelate with Mg2+ as shown in Scheme 2, which blocked the photo induced electron transfer (PET) mechanism and greatly enhanced the fluorescence of the proposed probe.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a simple structure probe was synthesized facilely. This new fluorescent probe showed significant fluorescence enhancement in presence of Mg2+ in ethanol-water solution (9:1, v:v, 20 mM HEPES, pH 10.0). We believe that these observations should serve as the platform to develop new probes for other metal ions.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81260268, 81360266), the Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province (No. 812188, 413131), the Colleges and Universities Scientific Research Projects of the Education Department of Hainan Province (Hjkj2013-29).

Author Contributions

In this paper, Chunwei Yu was responsible for the design and synthesis of probe P. Qiongyao Fu mainly focused on the testing experiments of P. Jun Zhang is responsible for organizing the experimental data and the writing of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhao, L.; Liu, Y.; He, C.; Wang, J.; Duan, C.Y. Coordination-driven nanosized lanthanide ‘Molecular Lanterns’ as luminescent chemosensors for the selective sensing of magnesium ions. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 335–343. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sargenti, A.; Farruggia, G.; Malucelli, E.; Cappadone, C.; Merolle, L.; Marraccini, C.; Andreani, G.; Prodi, L.; Zaccheroni, N.; Sgarzi, M.; et al. A novel fluorescent chemosensor allows the assessment of intracellular total magnesium in small samples. Analyst 2014, 139, 1201–1207. [Google Scholar]
  3. Maguire, M.E.; Cowan, J.A. Magnesium chemistry and biochemistry. BioMetals 2002, 15, 203–210. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang, D.Q. Fluorescent probes for sensing magnesium ions. Prog. Chem. 2009, 21, 715–723. [Google Scholar]
  5. Farruggia, G.; Iotti, S.; Prodi, L.; Montalti, M.; Zaccheroni, N.; Savage, P.B.; Trapani, V.; Sale, P.; Wolf, F.I. 8-hydroxyquinoline derivatives as fluorescent sensors for magnesium in living cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 344–350. [Google Scholar]
  6. Song, K.C.; Choi, M.G.; Ryu, D.H.; Kim, K.N.; Chang, S.K. Ratiometric chemosensing of Mg2+ ions by a calix[4]arene diamide derivative. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 5397–5400. [Google Scholar]
  7. Capitan-Vallvey, L.F.; Fernandez-Ramos, M.D.; Lapresta-Fernandez, A.; Brunet, E.; Rodrıguez-Ubis, J.C.; Juanes, O. Magnesium optical one-shot sensor based on a coumarin chromoionophore. Talanta 2006, 68, 1663–1670. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chaudhuri, T.; Shukla, P.; Nayak, S.K.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Banerjee, M. Solvent effect on photophysical properties and Mg2+ binding of 1,3-diphenyl-propane-1,3-dione. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2010, 215, 31–37. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ishida, M.; Naruta, Y.; Tani, F. A Porphyrin-Related Macrocycle with an Embedded 1,10-Phenanthroline Moiety: Fluorescent Magnesium(II) Ion Sensor. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 122, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dong, X.; Han, J.H.; Heo, C.H.; Kim, H.M.; Liu, Z.; Cho, B.R. Dual-Color Imaging of Magnesium/Calcium Ion Activities with Two-Photon Fluorescent Probes. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 8110–8113. [Google Scholar]
  11. Devaraj, S.; Tsui, Y.; Chiang, C.Y.; Yen, Y.P. A new dual functional sensor: Highly selective colorimetric chemosensor for Fe3+ and fluorescent sensor for Mg2+. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2012, 96, 594–599. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dong, Y.; Mao, X.; Jiang, X.; Hou, J.; Cheng, Y.; Zhu, C. L-Proline promoted fluorescent sensor for Mg2+ detection in a multicomponent sensory system. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 9450–9452. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ray, D.; Bharadwaj, P.K. A Coumarin-Derived Fluorescence Probe Selective for Magnesium. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 2252–2254. [Google Scholar]
  14. Singh, N.; Kaur, N.; Mulrooney, R.C.; Callan, J.F. A ratiometric fluorescent probe for magnesium employing excited state intramolecular proton transfer. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 6690–6692. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim, H.M.; Jung, C.; Jung, S.Y.; Hong, J.H.; Ko, Y.K.; Lee, K.J.; Cho, B.R. Environment-Sensitive Two-Photon Probe for Intracellular Free Magnesium Ions in Live Tissue. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3460–3463. [Google Scholar]
  16. Shoda, T.; Kikuchi, K.; Kojima, H.; Urano, Y.; Komatsu, H.; Suzuki, K.; Nagano, T. Development of selective, visible light-excitable, fluorescent magnesium probes with a novel fluorescence switching mechanism. Analyst 2003, 128, 719–723. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim, H.M.; Yang, P.R.; Seo, M.S.; Yi, J.S.; Hong, J.H.; Jeon, S.J.; Ko, Y.G.; Lee, K.J.; Cho, B.R. Magnesium Ion Selective Two-Photon Fluorescent Probe Based on a Benzo[h]chromene Derivative for in Vivo Imaging. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 2088–2096. [Google Scholar]
  18. Verma, K.D.; Forgács, A.; Uh, H.; Beyerlein, M.; Maier, M.E.; Petoud, S.; Botta, M.; Logothetis, N.K. New calcium-selective smart contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. Chemistry 2013, 19, 18011–18026. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. pH-dependence of P (10 μM) (★) and P (10 μM) plus Mg2+ (100 μM) (▪) in HEPES buffers as a function of different pH values in ethanol-water solution (9:1, v:v, 20 mM HEPES). The pH was modulated by adding 1.0 M HCl or 1.0 M NaOH in HEPES buffers.
Figure 1. pH-dependence of P (10 μM) (★) and P (10 μM) plus Mg2+ (100 μM) (▪) in HEPES buffers as a function of different pH values in ethanol-water solution (9:1, v:v, 20 mM HEPES). The pH was modulated by adding 1.0 M HCl or 1.0 M NaOH in HEPES buffers.
Sensors 14 12560f1 1024
Figure 2. UV-vis spectra of P (10 μM) in ethanol-water solution (9:1, v:v, 20 mM HEPES, pH 10.0) upon addition of 100 μM Mg2+.
Figure 2. UV-vis spectra of P (10 μM) in ethanol-water solution (9:1, v:v, 20 mM HEPES, pH 10.0) upon addition of 100 μM Mg2+.
Sensors 14 12560f2 1024
Figure 3. Absorbance spectra of P (10 μM) in ethanol-water solution (9:1, v:v, 20 mM HEPES, pH 10.0) in the presence of different amounts of Mg2+.
Figure 3. Absorbance spectra of P (10 μM) in ethanol-water solution (9:1, v:v, 20 mM HEPES, pH 10.0) in the presence of different amounts of Mg2+.
Sensors 14 12560f3 1024
Figure 4. Fluorescence spectra of P (10 μM) with different metal ions (100 μM) in ethanol-water solution (9:1, v:v, 20 mM HEPES, pH 10.0).
Figure 4. Fluorescence spectra of P (10 μM) with different metal ions (100 μM) in ethanol-water solution (9:1, v:v, 20 mM HEPES, pH 10.0).
Sensors 14 12560f4 1024
Figure 5. Fluorescence response of P (10 μM) with various concentrations of Mg2+ in ethanol-water solution (9:1, v:v, 20 mM HEPES, pH 10.0). Inset: the fluorescence of P (10 μM) as a function of Mg2+ concentrations (0.5–12 μM).
Figure 5. Fluorescence response of P (10 μM) with various concentrations of Mg2+ in ethanol-water solution (9:1, v:v, 20 mM HEPES, pH 10.0). Inset: the fluorescence of P (10 μM) as a function of Mg2+ concentrations (0.5–12 μM).
Sensors 14 12560f5 1024
Figure 6. Job's plot for determining the stoichiometry of P and Mg2+. The total concentration of P and Mg2+ was kept 10 μM.
Figure 6. Job's plot for determining the stoichiometry of P and Mg2+. The total concentration of P and Mg2+ was kept 10 μM.
Sensors 14 12560f6 1024
Scheme 1. The synthesis route of probe P.
Scheme 1. The synthesis route of probe P.
Sensors 14 12560f7 1024
Scheme 2. Proposed binding mode of P with Mg2+.
Scheme 2. Proposed binding mode of P with Mg2+.
Sensors 14 12560f8 1024

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, C.; Fu, Q.; Zhang, J. Synthesis and Characterization of a Mg2+-Selective Fluorescent Probe. Sensors 2014, 14, 12560-12567. https://doi.org/10.3390/s140712560

AMA Style

Yu C, Fu Q, Zhang J. Synthesis and Characterization of a Mg2+-Selective Fluorescent Probe. Sensors. 2014; 14(7):12560-12567. https://doi.org/10.3390/s140712560

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Chunwei, Qiongyao Fu, and Jun Zhang. 2014. "Synthesis and Characterization of a Mg2+-Selective Fluorescent Probe" Sensors 14, no. 7: 12560-12567. https://doi.org/10.3390/s140712560

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop