Next Article in Journal
Comments on “K. L. Cheng, Capacitor Theory for Nonfaradaic Potentiometry. Microchemical Journal 1990, 42, 524” and Reply to “Comments on ‘E. Pungor, The New Theory of Ion Selective Electrodes. Sensors 2001, 1, 1-12’ ”
Previous Article in Journal
External Second Gate, Fourier Transform Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Parametric Optimization for Detection of Weapons of Mass Destruction
 
 
Commentary published on 30 March 2004, see Sensors 2004, 4(1), 16-17.
Article published on 16 May 2001, see Sensors 2001, 1(1), 1-12.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Commentary

Comments on “E. Pungor, The New Theory of Ion Selective Electrodes. Sensors 2001, 1, 1-12”

Department of Physics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri 64110, USA
Sensors 2004, 4(1), 14-15; https://doi.org/10.3390/s40100014
Submission received: 15 March 2004 / Accepted: 23 March 2004 / Published: 30 March 2004
The techniques and information described in this paper [1] are nothing new. For instance, memory effect, x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, no ion penetration from the membrane surface to the inside membrane, the K+ adsorption at the valinomycin, etc. are well known [2]. In particular, the author did not cite many references for the information. For instance, the K+ and membrane graph (Fig. 1) was already reported in the literature, the author just copied it without citation or having permission from the publisher (Ref. 3, Fig. 3a). Without references, it gives the readers an impression that the information came from the author's original work. This violates the international code of ethics conduct.
The importance of the “new theory” and “how is the electrode potential produced” is emphasized in the paper [1]. However, the author only stated in about 10 lines at the end of paper to conclude with a GibbsDuham thermodynamic equation, –ΔG = nFE. He stated the ion adsorption and avoided its basis as being the capacitor theory. His simple statement indicated that an electrode potential is caused by charge separation at the surface of the electrode and that the interpretation is connected with the chemisorption of ion from the solution without any detailed discussions and logic supports. Obviously, he tried on purpose to avoid the key word capacitor because we proposed the capacitor theory. Not only is the ion adsorption by the electrode surface well known [2], the thermodynamics has nothing to do with the mechanism. Ion adsorption and charge density are closely associated with a capacitor. The mechanism should be emphasized in any new theory. The author has been unfamiliar with the difference between thermodynamics and mechanism; he mixed them up in his previous paper [4]. The new theory or mechanism in this paper is just a replica of the one reported before [4]. One should read my paper to understand the difference between thermodynamics and mechanism and their applications in ion selective electrode potential development [5]. We may have the same ΔG but different mechanisms. A scientific paper should be carefully prepared to benefit the readers, not playing magic tricks to mislead them. I have recently emphasized the importance of an author's careful attitude in writing chemical publications [6].

References

  1. Pungor, E. The New Theory of Ion Selective Electrodes. Sensors 2001, 1, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cheng, K. L. Capacitor theory for nonfaradaic potentiometry. Microchem. J. 1990, 42, 524. [Google Scholar]Cheng, K. L. A capacitor model for membrane electrodes. Proceedings, 31st IUPAC Congress Anal. Chem. Div., Sofia, Bulgaria; 1987; pp. 173–187. [Google Scholar]Cheng, K. L. Recent development of non-faradaic potentiometry. Microchem. J. 2002, 72, 269. [Google Scholar]
  3. Buck, R.P.; Lindner, E. Studies of potential generation across membrane sensors at interfaces and through back. Acc. Chem. Rev. 1998, 31, 257–266. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pungor, E. How to understand the response mechanism of ion-selective electrodes. Talanta 1997, 44, 1505–1508. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheng, K.L. Explanation of misleading Nernst slope by Boltzmann equation. Microchem. J. 1998, 59, 457–461. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheng, K. L. Comments on chemical publications. Paper presented in the 38th ACS Midwest Regional Meeting, University of Missouri-Columbia, November 2003.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cheng, K.L. Comments on “E. Pungor, The New Theory of Ion Selective Electrodes. Sensors 2001, 1, 1-12”. Sensors 2004, 4, 14-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/s40100014

AMA Style

Cheng KL. Comments on “E. Pungor, The New Theory of Ion Selective Electrodes. Sensors 2001, 1, 1-12”. Sensors. 2004; 4(1):14-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/s40100014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cheng, K. L. 2004. "Comments on “E. Pungor, The New Theory of Ion Selective Electrodes. Sensors 2001, 1, 1-12”" Sensors 4, no. 1: 14-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/s40100014

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop