Next Article in Journal
A Community-Based Event Delivery Protocol in Publish/Subscribe Systems for Delay Tolerant Sensor Networks
Next Article in Special Issue
Material Limitations on the Detection Limit in Refractometry
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Cooperative Fault Detection Employing Differential Global Positioning (DGPS), Inertial and Vision Sensors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 9
Issue 10
10.3390/s91007595
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Fiber Loop Ringdown — a Time-Domain Sensing Technique for Multi-Function Fiber Optic Sensor Platforms: Current Status and Design Perspectives

by
Chuji Wang
Department of Physics, and the Institute for Clean Energy Technology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, 39759, USA
Sensors 2009, 9(10), 7595-7621; https://doi.org/10.3390/s91007595
Submission received: 31 July 2009 / Revised: 9 September 2009 / Accepted: 17 September 2009 / Published: 28 September 2009
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Laser Spectroscopy and Sensing)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fiber loop ringdown (FLRD) utilizes an inexpensive telecommunications light source, a photodiode, and a section of single-mode fiber to form a uniform fiber optic sensor platform for sensing various quantities, such as pressure, temperature, strain, refractive index, chemical species, biological cells, and small volume of fluids. In FLRD, optical losses of a light pulse in a fiber loop induced by changes in a quantity are measured by the light decay time constants. FLRD measures time to detect a quantity; thus, FLRD is referred to as a time-domain sensing technique. FLRD sensors have near real-time response, multi-pass enhanced high-sensitivity, and relatively low cost (i.e., without using an optical spectral analyzer). During the last eight years since the introduction of the original form of fiber ringdown spectroscopy, there has been increasing interest in the FLRD technique in fiber optic sensor developments, and new application potential is being explored. This paper first discusses the challenging issues in development of multi-function, fiber optic sensors or sensor networks using current fiber optic sensor sensing schemes, and then gives a review on current fiber optic sensor development using FLRD technique. Finally, design perspectives on new generation, multi-function, fiber optic sensor platforms using FLRD technique are particularly presented.

1. Introduction

Modern industries and manufacturing need novel sensors to reduce cost, improve efficiency, monitor operation environments, assess the health of civil infrastructure, etc. For example, in coal-fired power plants, a multi-functional sensor system is needed to measure gasifier temperature for an optimized operation, to detect the thickness of gasifier refractory liners for early warning of potential cracks to reduce costs associated with unwanted early shut-down/forced unprepared shut-down, and to quantify trace chemical compounds in off-gas emissions. In the U.S., a 1% improvement in operating efficiency gained from a controls-and-sensors retrofit would result in $409 million in annual fuel savings, and a 1% increase in availability of improved control and accurate sensing would result in an additional 5,000 MW of capacity without additional power plants and at a minimal expense [1,2]. In the auto industries, a sensor system is needed to monitor trace chemicals in exhaust emissions and sense engine temperature, mechanical deformation, tire pressure, and in/out driving climate [3]. Carbon sequestration for enhanced oil recovery (injection of CO2 into an oil reservoir to push the oil out and store CO2 in the reservoir permanently) needs sensors to simultaneously monitor pressure, temperature, and CO2 concentration at multiple points in the reservoir and the sensors must be deployable through a deep down-hole steel pipe with an inner diameter of 4–6 inches [4-7]. In civil engineering (dams, bridges, pipelines, etc.), novel sensors are needed to monitor loading history and mechanical fatigue, detect early leakage, access post-storm damage, and identify toxic chemicals in a remote and timely manner [8-17]. Similar needs in many other applications continue to challenge scientists and engineers to create novel sensors and sensor systems [18-20].
Fiber optic sensors (FOS) have been playing an increasingly important role in the sensing community due to their attractive application features, such as low cost, small footprint, light weight, immunity to electromagnetic interference, and ability to cover long distances and be mutiplexible (for multiple function or single function in multiple sensing locations) [21-29]. FOS have been studied over three decades and have involved several rounds of revolutionary changes with advances in light sources, fiber optics, and spectroscopic methods. To date, sensing mechanisms (or transduction principles) of FOS have been well established [15,28,29]. A wide variety of transduction principles has been reported, such as fluorescence- [30-35], absorption- [36-40], interferometric-based transduction for fiber optic chemical sensors [41-43] and mechanical deformation-, thermal expansion-based transduction for fiber optic physical sensors [e.g., Fabry-Perot interferometric (FPI) pressure/temperature sensors, fiber Bragg grating (FBG) temperature sensors] [44-51]. Although new sensing mechanisms are still being pursued, the driving force for future FOS development lies in novel sensing platforms and enhanced performance [15,28,29]. The former means innovative sensing schemes, low manufacturing cost, and being technically and economically configurable with an existing sensor network. The combination of sensing mechanisms and sensing platforms dictates the sensor performance. Enhancement performance may have three different perspectives. First, enhanced performance of FOS means high sensitivity, high accuracy, high selectivity, and robustness. Significant strides have been made during the last ten years, and most FOS have demonstrated some or all of the four merits. Second, enhanced performance means rapid response, remote control, and fast data transmission. The majority of the on-going research in the field of FOS is focusing on addressing these issues. Third, enhanced performance means the ability to sense multiple parameters, including physical quantities (e.g., pressure, temperature, stress, vibration, velocity, etc.) and chemical quantities (e.g., concentration, identification, pH value, etc.), in a single sensor system while being readily able to be added to/dropped from an existing sensing network with low costs while still fulfilling the requirements of the first two perspectives.
One of the most significant challenges in creating these types of high-performance, multi-function FOS or sensor systems, which is a fundamental constraint in the sensing communities, is that current FOS are primarily based on the detection of a decrease in light intensity ΔI (e.g., absorption-based), a wavelength shift Δλ (e.g., FBG-based), or both (e.g., Raman-, fluorescence-based). To date, none of these conventional sensing schemes can be used as a uniform detection scheme to enable a sensor system to simultaneously detect multiple quantities, such as the aforementioned physical and chemical quantities, because these sensing schemes are sensitive to light intensity fluctuations and power losses, which limit the maximum number of sensors in a single sensor system for detection of multiple quantities. Additionally, integrating several different sensing schemes into a single system not only incurs high networking costs due to the requirements of optical amplification and expensive terminal detection equipment, but also makes signal transmission and data acquisition logistically difficult and inefficient.
One potential breakthrough in addressing the challenging issues stated above is to develop a multi-functional fiber optic sensor platform using the recently developed fiber loop ringdown (FLRD) technology (see Section 3) [52-58]. So far, several types of FLRD-based sensors, such as FLRD gas/liquid sensors [53-59], FLRD pressure (P) sensors [59,60], FLRD Bragg grating temperature (T) sensors [61-63], FLRD strain sensors [64-66], FLRD refractive index sensors [67], and FLRD microfluidics sensors [68-69], have been reported during the last eight years. Each individual sensor has demonstrated high sensitivity (several orders of magnitude higher than a conventional FOS if the same sensing mechanism is employed) and high speed of detection gained from the nature of the FLRD technique [52-71]. Most importantly, all of the aforementioned FLRD-based sensors are based on a universal sensing scheme to measure all quantities (P, T, gas concentration, liquid volume, etc.) in time-domain. Specifically, the optical losses of a laser pulse in the fiber loop due to a change of a measurand are measured by the light intensity decay rate (called the ringdown time). FLRD, virtually, measures time to detect a quantity of interest. FLRD is relatively new in spectroscopy and sensing communities; its potential to create new generation of FOS and sensor systems has not much been discussed.
Our research motivation is to address the challenging issues in creating a multi-function, high performance, fiber optic sensor system. This article first gives a review on sensing functionalities, sensing mechanisms, and sensing schemes of current fiber optic sensors, and then describes the principle of the time-domain FLRD technique. After that, the current status of FLRD-based FOS in terms of chemical sensors and physical sensors is reviewed. Finally, the theoretical consideration and design perspectives of multi-function fiber optic sensor platforms using the FLRD technique are presented and four speculative design modules are given to illustrate the concept of new generation, multi-function, fiber optic sensors or sensor networks based on novel sensing platforms.

2. Sensing Functionalities, Sensing Mechanisms, and Sensing Schemes of Current FOS

The field of FOS has yielded more than 2,600 publications in the last ten years alone (searches conducted on SciFinder and Web of Science), and it is almost impossible to cover all aspects of FOS in a single exhaustive review. There are many different FOS classifications according to the measured parameters, the topology of a sensor, the transduction principles, and the light parameter modulated. We may also simply categorize FOS into two major groups based on functionality, fiber optic chemical sensors and fiber optic physical sensors. The former includes detection of chemical quantities, such as concentration and identification of chemical species, pH values, etc. [72-76]; the latter includes physical quantities, such as pressure, force, temperature, stress, strain, vibration, velocity, surface roughness, frequency, etc. [77-86]. Due to the diversity of the quantities (measurands or parameters), a variety of sensing mechanisms has been investigated to improve performance on either one or all of the basic merits of sensitivity, selectivity, accuracy, reliability, and robustness. To date, various sensing mechanisms have been established for individual sensors and will remain largely unchanged in next several years [15,28,29].
However, driven by a myriad of needs in demanding applications, novel sensing platforms and enhanced performance have become the driving forces for future FOS development [15,28,29]. Table 1 lists current FOS in terms of sensing functionalities, sensing mechanisms, and sensing schemes. Although Table 1 is not an all-inclusive FOS list (e.g., biological and medical FOS are not included [87-91]), the major types of FOS in terms of sensing schemes are included. It is clear that most chemical sensors are based on a sensing scheme of intensity vs. frequency (or wavelength) using a spectrometer, i.e., an optical spectral analyzer (OSA). For example, FOS for oxygen is based on the quenching effect of oxygen on certain wavelength-dependent fluorophorers [30,31]. FBG temperature sensors are based on the detection scheme of intensity vs. wavelength using an OSA to measure a shift of the Bragg wavelength due to a change in temperature [43,50,51]. These types of sensing schemes can be defined as frequency-domain sensing schemes. The intensity vs. frequency sensing scheme is working well for each individual sensor in most applications, but it has significant limitations in sensor networking because the detection scheme suffers from light power fluctuations and power losses. Optical amplification is usually employed in a network for the maximum number of sensors to be multiplexed; however, the optical amplification often generates amplified spontaneous emission noise (ASE) that leads to a poor signal-to-noise ratio [92-94].
Different from the frequency-domain FOS, time-domain FOS has become an increasingly active area of research [95-97]. One example are the time-domain reflectormetric FBG temperature sensors. By using a time division multiplexing (TDM) method, Wang's group recently demonstrated the capability of multiplexing 1,000 Bragg grating sensors along a single fiber [95]. In this TDM scheme, a narrow laser pulse is coupled into a fiber along which many weak gratings are scribed so that each reflects only an extremely small fraction of the incident power. This allows many successive laser pulses to be reflected back. From the arrival times of these pulses, the sensor locations can be determined. At the same time, the magnitude of the reflected intensity of each pulse gives an indication of the change of temperature (or pressure) or any activity that can result in a shift of the bandwidth curve of the FBG. This type of sensing scheme is universally applicable. However, in the aforementioned sensing scheme, signals from different sensor heads remain to be detected in the form of intensity vs. time. The sensitivity is determined by spectral resolution, the minimum detectable intensity change, and stability of the light source. Strictly speaking, this type of sensing scheme is still a light intensity based detection scheme, and the ultimate sensitivity is limited to the stability of the light intensity.

3. Fiber Loop Ringdown — a Universally Applicable Time-Domain Sensing Scheme for FOS

3.1. Origin of Fiber Loop Ringdown

During the last several years, a new fiber loop ringdown (FLRD) technique has been introduced for chemical and physical quantity sensing. The FLRD technique is fundamentally evolved from the well-know cavity ringdown spectroscopy (CRDS) technique [98-106]; CRDS obtains high sensitivities because of the multi-pass nature of the optical absorption path, as illustrated in Figure 1.
Since its introduction, the CRD technique has rapidly developed and matured, from initial applications focusing on weak absorption spectroscopic measurements to now being a fully commercialized process for trace gas analysis and sensing. Although new ideas and the latest technologies have prompted the evolution of the CRDS technique with various forms of ringdown cavities [106-115], all of the CRD techniques are based on one measuring principle: measuring time decay rates (ringdown times) of the light intensity to determine gas species within a gas cell or adsorbed analytes at a surface. This feature has recently been implemented by using a “conceptual cavity” — a fiber loop formed by a section of single mode fiber [52].

3.2. The Principle of Fiber Loop Ringdown

A light pulse is coupled into a fiber loop and travels (rings) inside the fiber loop for many round trips. In each round trip, a small fraction of the light pulse couples out of the loop into a photodetector through a fiber coupler; and the rest of the light travels in the fiber, experiencing internal fiber transmission losses. The output signal observed by the detector follows an exponential decay. This behavior can be modeled by [59,60]
d I d t = − I A c n L
where I is the light intensity at time t (we assume the time equals zero when the light source is shut off and a light pulse is injected into the loop), and L,c, n, and A are the total length of the fiber loop, speed of light in a vacuum, fiber refractive index, and total fiber transmission loss (by percentage) of the light in each round trip, respectively. The total fiber transmission loss includes the fiber absorption loss, the fiber couplersapos;insertion losses, and the fiber scattering loss; and A = aL + E + γ, where αis the wavelength-dependent absorption coefficient for the fiber core material with units of, e.g., cm-1, Eis the total insertion loss of the fiber couplers, and γ is the total fiber scattering loss. The solution of Equation (1) describes the temporal decay behavior of the light intensity observed by the detector:
I = I 0 e − c n L A t
Equation (2) shows that FLRD measures the light intensity decay rate, not the absolute intensity change, ΔI. Therefore, the measurement of A is insensitive to fluctuations of I0, the incident light intensity.
The time required for the light intensity (I) to decrease to 1/e of the initial light intensity (I0), as observed by the detector, is referred to as the ringdown time, τ0, and is given by Equation (3a) [59,60]
τ 0 = n L c A
τ = n L c ( A + B )
For a given FLRD sensor (pressure, temperature, or strain, etc.), the total transmission loss, A, is a constant, which is determined by the physical parameters of the sensor, such as the fiber absorption loss, the couplersapos; insertion losses, the refractive index, and the fiber length. Clearly, the lower the losses of the light in the fiber are, the longer the decay time constants (τ0) will be. When an external action, such as absorption, or a change of any measurands, such as pressure, temperature, or stress, occurs at one section (sensor head) of the fiber loop, the result is an additional optical loss, B, of the light pulse in the fiber loop, which causes a change in the ringdown time, τ, given by Equation (3b).
From Equation 3a,b, we have [59,60]:
( 1 τ − 1 τ 0 ) = c n L B
Equation (4), namely, the principle of FLRD, indicates that for a given fiber ringdown sensor, a change in a sensing activity (e.g., gas absorption, fiber mechanical deformation, thermal expansion, etc.) is determined by measuring τ0, the ringdown time without the sensing activity, and τ, the ringdown time with the activity, and that the term (1/τ – 1/τ0) has a linear relationship with the activity-induced optical loss, B.
Figure 2(a) shows a schematic diagram of the universal FLRD sensing scheme (a sensor unit). Figure 2(b) shows that multiple FLRD-based sensors can be fabricated by using different transduction mechanisms for detecting each of the individual measurands. Figure 2(c) shows a typical light intensity decay behavior observed by the photodetector. Each of the separated spikes shows the intensity of the light coming out of the loop after each succesive round trip. The time between two adjacent spikes is the round trip time of the light inside the loop. The envelope follows a single exponential decay. Therefore, the decay rate is immune to pulse-to-pulse light intensity fluctuations. A slower decay rate (longer ringdown time) means lower optical losses of the light in the loop, and vice versa. FLRD measures time to determine a quantity.

3.3. Advantages of Fiber Loop Ringdown for FOS

The features of FLRD include: (1) A quantity is measured by measuring the time constant (a time-domain measurement technique); (2) The detection sensitivity is proportionally enhanced by the number of multiple-round trips; (3) The measurement is insensitive to intensity fluctuations of the light source; and (4) An entire ringdown event (the light residence time inside the fiber loop) is fast, e.g., on the order of microseconds, depending on optical losses and fiber length. Furthermore, FLRD also possesses following attributes: (1) FLRD requires low laser power, e.g., ∼μW; (2) FLRD allows FLRD-based multiple sensor units (sensor loops) to be multiplexed due to the uniform sensing scheme and waveguide; (3) Sensor systems (or sensor networks) built on FLRD sensors have no need of optical amplification, thus no associated ASE noise; (4) FLRD offers high configurability, e.g., changing a sensor head in the fiber loop (e.g., from a FBG for temperature sensing to an air-gap for chemical detection) does not necessitate a change of the detectors and their settings because of the uniform time detection scheme; and (5) FLRD sensors, regardless of absorption-based chemical sensors or FBG-FLRD temperature sensors, allow an inexpensive photodiode, instead of an expensive OSA, to be used as a detector. A FLRD sensor system will have low cost as compared to a typical FOS employing an OSA as the detector. As an example, a side-by-side comparison of a time-domain FBG-FLRD temperature sensor with a frequency-domain FBG-OSA temperature sensor can be seen in Table 2.

4. Current FLRD-Based FOS

4.1. FLRD Chemical Sensors

The first report on fiber loop ringdown spectroscopy was published in 2001 [52]. Stewart et al. introduced an optical fiber loop with a length of several tens of meters with a 5 cm open path micro-optical gas cell for gas phase absorption measurements [52,53]. Simplified versions of fiber loop ringdown devices were introduced by both Lehmann [54,116] and Loock [55,117] groups later on. Tarsa et al. [54] reported their study on an optical fiber resonator for spectroscopic measurements in which the sensor head was made of a section of tapered fiber in the loop and evanescent field absorption was detected. A small volume of liquid sample was detected by this type of FLRD technique. They also demonstrated the detection of a single bio cell adsorption event [118]. Loock group [55-57] reported the detection of a small volume of dye solutions by introducing a micro-air gap into a section of fiber in the fiber loop. They demonstrated a detection limit of ∼10–10 mol dye solution using both a cw laser and a pulsed laser [57]. The same group further advanced the FLRD technique by introducing a phase-shift measurement, which greatly improved the data acquisition rate to close to real-time (10–100 ms) [70]. This technique has been demonstrated to be suitable for low cost, real-time, and online detection of capillary electrophoresis with a detection limit at micromole concentration levels. Using flow injections, the device can detect a series of solution samples at different concentrations. The demonstrated detection limit is 5.3 × 10–12 mol samples in a 530 pL (10–12 liter) volume. A minimum fractional absorption of 1.6 cm–1 for an absorption path-length of 30 μm, which corresponds to a flow concentration of 10 μM, has been demonstrated by using the FLRD technique with a fast gain switch diode laser [69-71]. Very recently, the same group has demonstrated detections of volatile organic compounds using the phase-shift FLRD technique combined with the functionally-designed polymer coating of a LPG [119]. In that work, the LPG was coated with a specialized polydimethylsiloxane polymer, which had a refractive index matched to the cladding material and was capable of extracting analytes of interest, e.g., xylene and cyclohexane, into the polymer matrix. Thus, a change in the optical transmission loss resulting from a wavelength shift of the LPG's spectral bandwidth curve was detected by the FLRD device. Xylene and cyclohexane vapors in different concentrations were detected and a detection limit of 300 ppm of xylene vapor was achieved. This work demonstrates the promise of FLRD for chemical sensing and the versatility of FLRD for incorporating a variety of sensing mechanisms into the ringdown sensing platform. In an early study, Vogler et al. developed a FLRD device and demonstrated measurements of the diffusion coefficient of hydrogen on silicon by monitoring the absorption of the OH radicals in the NIR region [112]. Wang et al. demonstrated a FLRD-based methane sensor using a U-bracket with a 2 cm air-gap as the absorption gas cell (Figure 3), and the real-time, on-line detection limit of CH4 was 5% [113].

4.2. FLRD Physical Sensors

Due to the ringdown enhanced detection sensitivity, high speed of measurement, and low cost for instrumentation, FLRD-based sensors have rapidly gone beyond chemical sensing to physical sensing. In 2004, Wang et al. demonstrated the FLRD technique for the development of pressure and force sensors [59,60,120]. A section of bare single mode fiber with a length of 1 cm was used as the sensor head. The sensing principle is primarily based on the fact that micro mechanical deformation of the fiber drastically increases optical loss in the fiber loop [59,60,111]. The sensor showed repeatable response and good reversibility to pressure changes, as shown in Figure 4 (left). Each step in Figure 4 contained many data points which were collected repeatedly at one pressure. The sensor's response to changes in pressure was less than one second. By converting the changes in ringdown time to optical losses, the sensor's response to pressure change had good linearity, as shown in Figure 4 (right). By using different configurations of the sensor heads, different sensing ranges of pressure and/or force can be achieved by the FLRD pressure/force sensor.
Using a similar FLRD approach, Wang et al. introduced an optical fiber Bragg grating (FBG) into the loop as the sensing element to develop FBG-FLRD temperature sensors [61-63,121]. Since the Bragg wavelength of a FBG is temperature dependent, changes in the temperature in the sensor head (FBG) are related to corresponding optical losses of the laser beam through the FBG. Different optical losses due to the shift of the FBG curve, resulting from the temperature change in the FBG, are detected by measuring the ringdown time. One of the advantages of the fiber FBG-FLRD temperature sensors is high temperature accuracy, which is not limited by the bandwidth of a FBG and the spectral resolution of an OSA. In that work [63], an accuracy of 0.06 °C was demonstrated in the temperature range of 92–114 °C.
Based on the micro-bending mechanism, which explains the induced optical losses due to fiber stain, a fiber loop ringdown strain sensor was demonstrated by Tarsa et al [64]. Very recently, a long period grating was introduced into a fiber loop and fiber strain sensing was reported by Ni et al. [65]. Since fiber loop ringdown time is a function of several parameters of a fiber loop device, including refractive index, therefore, FLRD technique can measure fiber refractive index with high sensitivity [60]. Fiber ringdown index sensor was also investigated recently [67].
FLRD sensors are still in their infancy. With its universally applicable sensing scheme and attractive application features, many FLRD sensors should be expected to come [71]. Table 3 lists the physical and chemical FLRD-based sensors which have been reported as of the writing of this article.

5. Perspectives on the Development of Multi-Function Fiber Optic Sensor Platforms Using FLRD

A multiple function sensor platform may include a light source, fiber loops, and a detector. The sensing scheme will be based on the FLRD technique. By adding functionally-designed FLRD sensor units (e.g., P, T, strain, gas concentration sensors) into the sensor platform, a multi-functional sensor system can be built through sensor multiplexing/integration. The high performance of the sensor system (high sensitivity, high speed of detection, and no adverse impact from intensity fluctuations of the light source) gains from the nature of FLRD. The uniform time-domain FLRD sensing scheme offers unique advantages for sensorsapos; multiplexing, data transfer/processing, and low system costs.

5.1. Theoretical Considerations of Multi-Function, High Performance, Fiber Optical Sensor Platforms

High sensitivity The detection sensitivity is often characterized by the minimum detectable optical loss. Rearranging Equation (4), we have:
B = t r τ 0 Δ τ τ = 1 m Δ τ Δ τ
( Δ τ = τ 0 − τ )
where tr is the round trip time of the laser pulse in the fiber loop, and m is the number of round trips. Therefore, the minimum detectable optical loss Bmin, which is defined as the 1-σ detection limit, is given by:
B min = 1 m Δ σ τ τ
where Δστ is the 1-σ standard deviation of the ringdown time. Δστ/τ can be experimentally achieved at the level of ∼10–3 [59-63], which is a typical level of the minimum detectable ΔI/I0 in a conventional intensity-based sensing scheme (although good absorbance spectrometers can measure fractional intensity changes down to 10–5 in some cases). Therefore, if a conventional intensity-based fiber optic sensor has a detection limit B, a FLRD optic sensor will have a detection limit B/m, thus improving the detection sensitivity by a factor of m. Furthermore, if the intensity of the light source fluctuates, e.g., I0 ± 0.2%, the detection sensitivity of the intensity-based fiber optic sensor is significantly affected; yet, the detection sensitivity of the FLRD optic sensor is not affected.
For example, assume a fiber loop sensor unit consists of 100 m single mode silicon fiber with a refractive index of 1.464, as illustrated in Figure 2(a). The coupling ratios at points 1 and 2 are both 0.1/99.9 (0.0043 dB loss). The absorption loss rate of the fiber is ∼0.3 dB/km at 1,550–1,650 nm. Therefore, the total optical losses of the laser pulse traveling in one round trip in the fiber loop will be 0.0386 dB, corresponding to 0.85% optical loss. From Equation 3(a) in Section 3, the ringdown time would be 57.4 microseconds (μs), and the round trip time, tr, would be 488 nanoseconds (ns). That means the light pulse travels the loop 118 times during one ringdown time. Therefore, if we use this FLRD sensor to measure an optical loss due to a change in, e.g., P, T, strain, or gas concentration, the detection sensitivity is ∼118 times (or two orders of magnitude) better than that obtained by a conventional intensity-based sensor. Therefore, the detectivity of FLRD is enhanced by multiple rounds of interaction in the sensor. In another words, e.g., 1,000 round trips in a ringdown time means 1,000-fold enhancement of the detection sensitivity.
Fast response. A typical ringdown event is on the order of μs, as shown in the above example. It has been widely demonstrated in the literature that one ringdown data point, e.g., a gas concentration, P or T, can be readily obtained within a second even when hundreds of ringdown events are averaged to improve signal-to-noise ratio in the data processing.
High accuracy. The measurement accuracy of the FLRD technique can be seen in a FLRD gas sensor, for example. If the gas absorption is responsible for the optical loss, B, in Equation(4), then we can determine the measurement uncertainty of the gas concentration from
( 1 τ − 1 τ 0 ) = c n L B = c n L σ s l
where σ (cm2/molecule) is the absorption cross-section of the gas at a particular frequency, l (cm) is the laser path through the gas, and s is the gas concentration (molecules/cm3). Since the fiber length L and the laser path-length l in Equation (7) can be accurately determined, the measurement uncertainty of gas concentration s is mainly determined by the ringdown time baseline stability, Δτ/τ, for a given absorption cross-section. As previously discussed, the baseline stability can be typically on the order of 0.1%. Therefore, with a know absorption cross-section at a particular frequency, FLRD fiber optic sensors can have a measurement accuracy of 0.1% of the full-scale reading. Note that absorption cross-sections documented in the literature or determined in experiments are often not 100% accurate; they typically have an error on the order of 1%–5% that is significantly larger than the ringdown baseline stability, 0.1%. Therefore, measurement accuracy of a FLRD gas sensor is ultimately determined by the accuracy of the absorption cross-section.
Configuration of the sensor platform. A sensor platform's configuration can be developed based on the following facts: 1) FLRD measures time to detect a quantity, 2) the time division multiplexing (TDM) and Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) are established techniques used in signal processing and fiber optic network multiplexing, and 3) a FLRD decay process is on the order of μs and a light pulse experiences many round trips during one ringdown time, e.g., 118 rounds in the previous example. These three factors enable the sensing signals from multiple sensor units in a sensor platform in a serial configuration to be precisely coupled and decoupled using the TDM technique with a temporal resolution up to 0.1 ns. For instance, in the above example, if a fast data acquisition card has a time resolution of 0.1 ns or better, 4,880 signals from 4,880 sensor units can be precisely sequenced and timed within the round trip time, 488 ns. On the other hand, if MEMS are used to configure a sensor platform in a parallel configuration, the fast ringdown event (e.g., 57.4 μs in the above example) and high switching frequency of MEMS (e.g., kHz) enable more than 1000 FLRD sensor units designed for sensing different quantities to be multiplexed into a single sensor platform. In additional to the timing issues, laser power distribution also affects the maximum number of sensor units to be multiplexed. For instance, if a laser diode output is 20 mW, after 4880 consecutive injections of the laser power into 4,880 fiber loops (e.g., in a serial configuration) at a rate of 0.1% per loop, the light intensity to be injected into the 4,880th loop will be only 20 × (1 – 0.001)4,880 mW = 0.15 mW, but it is still enough to power a FLRD sensor unit.

5.2. Design Perspectives of Individual FLRD Sensor Units Sensing Chemical and Physical Quantities

Figure 6 illustrates four different configurations of the sensor heads, as an example, for detecting P, T, and gas concentration. For sensing P, a section of bare SMF (without plastic jacket) is typically embedded in a micro-bending platform to form the sensor head (Note that F = PS, with a known surface area S of the platform, the P sensor also senses the force applied). The sensitivity of FLRD pressure sensors depicted in Figure 6(a) can be characterized by the minimum detectable pressure change per ringdown time change (s), Pa/s. Wavelength selections of the FBG-FLRD temperature sensors are determined by the Bragg wavelength of the FBG which is used as the sensing element. Different from the current FBG-OSA temperature sensors, in which an OSA is used to measure a shift of the peak wavelength of the FBG, the FBG-FLRD temperature sensors measure the optical transmission losses of the laser transmitting through the FBG in terms of ringdown times, as illustrated in Figure 6(b). A narrow bandwidth FBG (with a narrow wing in each side of the bandwidth curve) can provide high sensitivity (because a small shift drastically changes transmission rate at a given wavelength). FBGs, long period gratings (LPGs), and linear fiber gratings (LFGs) can be employed to form temperature sensor heads to achieve different sensing properties, such as sensitivity, temperature measuring range, response linearity, etc. [51,124-126]. The sensitivity of FLRD temperature sensors can be characterized by the minimum detectable temperature change per ringdown time change, °C/s.
For CH4 and CO2 sensors, two NIR telecommunications laser diodes can be used for the detection of CH4 and CO2 at 1,651 nm and 1,572 nm. Wavelength selections should be based on a combined consideration of sensitivity and possible spectral interferences, and they can be characterized based on a spectral simulation using HITRAN 96 [127,135]. For the sensor heads, a U-shape air-gap bracket [as seen in Figures 3 and 6(c)] [113] with ultra-low insertion loss (e.g., <0.1 dB) and high thermal and mechanical stability can be acquired. Gas samples can be directly flowing through or static in the air-gap. The sensing mechanism is based on Beer's Law. Therefore, as compared with the conventional single-pass absorption, the detection sensitivity will be enhanced by the presence of multiple round trips as detailed in Section 3. Due to the limited length of the air gap, e.g., 1 cm (longer air gaps, higher sensitivities, but also larger optical losses), the detection limit of this configuration is typically at the levels of a few percent. The air-gap configuration is advantageous for chemical identification (note that with the same path-length and spectral region, CH4 is not detectable by the single-pass absorption scheme). In order to further enhance the detection sensitivity, a photonic crystal fiber (PCF) with air holes in the fiber core [Figure 6(d)] can be fabricated into a fiber loop with low optical insertion loss. Current technology allows for the lowest insertion loss in the connection of SMF with PCF to be <0.3 dB. Using a section of PCF as a gas cell in the fiber loop is desirable. In this way, a long portion of the fiber loop can be filled with gas samples. The detection sensitivity for the same species at the same absorption wavelength would be doubly enhanced by both the nature of the multiple round trips of the laser pulse in the loop and the long path-length of the laser pulse in the sample in each round trip (e.g., from 1 cm of the air-gap to 1 m of air-hole PCF per round trip), this directly results in an additional sensitivity enhancement by 100-fold (note that with a longer PCF, the gas diffusion time will be longer).

5.3. Design Perspectives of the Sensor Platforms in a Serial Configuration

Figure 7 illustrates a design perspective of a FLRD sensor platform in a serial configuration (bus configuration in networking topology) [94]. The concept of the integration and control of the two sensor units in the serial configuration is based on the TDM technique used in digital signal processing and has been demonstrated recently in a double fiber loop ringdown system by Li et al. [24,123,128-133]. A laser pulse of intensity I0 from a diode laser operating in the telecommunications C-band, e.g., at 1,550 nm, is injected into the fiber coupler. A 0.1% of I0 is coupled into Loop1 through the fiber coupler. The rest of the light (99.9% I0) will be used as the input light pulse for Loop2, where 0.1% of the 99.9% I0 will be coupled into Loop2. Each loop will have individual ringdown events, which yield different ringdown times (determined by length of the loop, insertion losses, etc.). The detector (photodiode) observes a coupled signal from both of the loops as illustrated in Figure 7(a). The TDM technique in the data processing portion will be used to demultiplex the coupled ringdown signal into two individual ringdown decays, each of which yields a separate ringdown time [122,123]. The time delay between the two ringdown events occur in the two loops is adjusted by the length of the delay fiber. In this configuration, the time sequence determines the location of each sensor unit (to distinguishing which is which) and the change in ringdown time in each loop relates to a change in the magnitude of a measurand in each unit.
Each ringdown decay waveform monitored by the detector will be input to an analog to digital (A/D) converter, digitized into, e.g., 1,000, data points, and transferred to a computer in the electronic module for processing. The data points will be fitted into a single exponential decay waveform to obtain the ringdown time by first taking logarithm of the voltage reported by the photodetector at each sample point and then using linear regression to determine the slope [127]. Fast A/D conversion can have a time resolution of ns. Different combination modes, e.g., two P sensors, one P sensor and one T sensor, and two T sensors, can be achieved. In principle, more sensor units can be added to the platform to form a multi-functional sensor system. The maximum number of sensor units in the platform is determined by the minimum resolvable time delay between two adjacent loops and by the round trip time, as discussed in Section 3. Potential applications of this serial configuration include situations that necessitate two (or more) sensors to be deployed in different locations with a specifically separate distance, e.g., force monitoring along a bridge, leakage detection along a pipeline, etc. It must be noted that by rearranging the fiber loops, sensor units can be also deployed in a parallel fashion while the multiplexing and decoupling of the signal is still based on the TDM technique.

5.4. Design Perspectives of the Sensor Platforms in a Parallel Configuration

Figure 8 illustrates a speculative design of a parallel configuration of the sensor platform. The multiplexing and control can be achieved by using the MEMS optical switching technique [130]. Experimental issues in this design will include the MEMS optical switching frequency and associated electrical and optical noises, which affect ringdown baseline noise. Data deconvolution algorithms in terms of accuracy, data processing time, intelligent control, and the capability of networking will be different from the ones in the serial configuration.
In this parallel configuration, signals from the two sensors are decoupled. The sensor system alternatively measures P1 and P2 with a time delay between each measurement set by the delay time which triggers the MEMS. Current MEMS can have 1 × 32 channels or higher with switching frequencies up to MHz. Selection of switching frequency should take into consideration the duration of each ringdown measurement event. The inverse of the switching frequency of the MEMS must be greater than ringdown decay time so that each ringdown event can be completely measured (data is transmitted and ringdown time is derived). For instance, if a ringdown event is on the order of μs, then the highest switching frequency of can only be ∼100 kHz. This assumes use of a fast A/D converter and data transmission processing [127]. The maximum number of sensor units in a platform is not restricted by the limit of the TDM mentioned above. This configuration is to some extent advantageous over the serial configuration in signal processing since the signals from different loops are not coupled. A hybrid configuration (serial connections in each of the parallel branches) can be also achieved.

5.5. Perspective on an Integration of a Multi-Functional Sensor System Based on FLRD Sensor Platforms

Figure 9 shows the architecture of a multi-functional sensor system formed by adding sensor units to the sensor platform. The top four sensors (Loop1 – Loop4) detect the same quantity, e.g., pressure (P), at different locations; the bottom four sensor units detect T, CH4, and CO2 at the same location (can be in different locations, too). All of the sensing signals from each individual sensor unit are fused and transmitted uniformly through a single fiber linked to the detector that observes a coupled ringdown decay. Location of each sensor will be determined by the time sequence as discussed in the preceding sections. Each quantity, such as P, T, and gas concentrations, will be determined by individual ringdown times, which are obtained from deconvolution of the coupled ringdown decay. Laser diodes operating at different wavelengths are multiplexed by using WDM [24,127,136,137], and the MEMS selectively controls the laser beam with the needed wavelengths to be injected into the fiber loops (or loop branches) for detection of different quantities. The entire sensor system uses a single detector to monitor a single coupled ringdown decay and detects the four quantities simultaneously. Although FLRD chemical sensors also use spectral fingerprints to identify gas species and determine absolute gas concentrations based on absorption, this new sensor platform cannot be achieved by the conventional intensity-based sensing scheme. For instance, a FBG-OSA temperature sensor measures wavelength shift, I-Δλ, and a conventional fiber gas sensor measures ΔI/I0. Configuring these different detection schemes into a single sensor platform would be practically impossible, unless an array of terminal detection equipment, such as OSAs, photodiodes, etc. are bundled together and signal from each sensor unit is detected separately. In that case, sensor system (networking) costs, response time, and data transmission/processing efficiency would become significant issues.
Theoretically, many more sensor units can be added to the platform, as illustrated by the nth sensor unit marked by the dashed line in the figure. In principle, such a sensor platform can form a sensor system that has n sensor units for detecting ≤ n parameters at n different locations; and n is determined by the round trip time of the fiber loop and the time resolution of the data acquisition card, as discussed in Sections 3 and 5.1. Various sensing mechanisms can be directly adopted to configure sensor heads to form different FLRD sensor units for measurements of different parameters, such as stress, strain, vibration, and chemical species. Figure 9 just shows one type of configuration of the sensor platform. Other configurations of the sensor platform can also be speculated. Different configurations certainly have their own advantages and limitations. For instance, potential optical interference between two adjacent laser beams may be generated in the serial configuration [122]. Influence of the interference effect on signal-to-noise ratio and data processing should be a challenging issue. The parallel configuration may be advantageous with regard to this point; however, the data sampling rates will be relatively lower than that in the serial configuration due to the alternative measurement approach. Since the signals from the different units are decoupled in the parallel configuration, this feature may results in an easier and faster data acquisition. Although FLRD is insensitive to power fluctuations and requires minimal laser power, effect of laser power on the networking of the sensor system needs to be also considered.

6. Conclusions

FLRD is relatively new to the spectroscopy and gas sensing communities, and its potential for development of new generation, multi-function, sensing platforms has not been discussed much. This paper gives a brief review on the current FRLD-based fiber optic sensors with an emphasis on potential of development of new generation, multi-function, fiber optic sensor platforms using the FLRD technique. Several speculative examples are given to illustrate the new concept, which may help advance the field of sensing science and technology beyond the single function (quantity), single location sensing limited by the conventional sensing scheme to the simultaneous multi-function, multi-location sensing using a new time-domain FLRD sensing platform.

Acknowledgments

The work is supported by National Science Foundation through the grant CMMI-0927539 and Department of Energy through the grant DEFC01006EW07040-06040310.

References and Notes

  1. Maley, S.; Romanosky, R.; Chen, Z.Y. Sensors and Controls Workshop Summary Report; Report No. U.S. DOE/NETL-2002/1162; National Energy Technology Lab.: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, November 30 2001. [Google Scholar]
  2. Martinez-Frias, J.; Aceves, S.M.; Smith, R.J.; Brandt, H. A coal-fired power plant with zero atmospheric emissions. J. Eng. Gas Turb. Pow. 2008, 130, 023005:1–023005:7. [Google Scholar]
  3. Marek, J.; Trah, H.P.; Suzuki, Y.; Yokomori, I.; Hesse, J.; Gopel, W.; Gardner, J.W. (Eds.) Sensors Applications, Sensors for Automotive Applications; Wiley-VCH: Berlin, DE, 2003; Volume 4.
  4. DOE. Carbon Sequestration Technology Roadmap and Program Plan U.S.; DOE National Energy Technology Laboratory: Washington D.C., USA, April 29 2004. [Google Scholar]
  5. Qin, X.S.; Huang, G.H.; Zhang, H.; Chakma, A. An integrated decision support system for management of CO2 geologic storage in the Weyburn field. Petrol. Sci. Technol. 2008, 26, 813–843. [Google Scholar]
  6. Han, F.X.; Lindner, J.S.; Wang, C. Making carbon sequestration a paying proposition. Naturwissenschaften 2007, 94, 170–182. [Google Scholar]
  7. Khoo, H.H.; Tan, R.B.H. Environmental impact evaluation of conventional fossil fuel production (oil and natural gas) and enhanced resource recovery with potential CO2 sequestration. Energy Fuels 2006, 20, 1914–1924. [Google Scholar]
  8. Inaudi, D.; López-Higuera, J.M. (Eds.) Photonic sensing technology in civil engineering applications. In Handbook of Optical Fibre Sensing Technology; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002; pp. 517–542.
  9. Nnaji, B.O.; Wang, A. Sensors and Controls for Advanced Manufacturing; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, January 2 1998. [Google Scholar]
  10. Michie, W.C. Distributed sensing for intelligent civil engineering structures. Proc. SPIE 1996, 2779, 932–946. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yu, B.; Kim, D.W.; Deng, J.D.; Xiao, H.; Wang, A. Fiber Fabry-Perot sensors for detection of partial discharges in power transformers. Appl. Opt. 2003, 42, 3241–50. [Google Scholar]
  12. Culshaw, B. Smart applications of optical fibers. Adv. Sci. Technol. 1999, 25, 381–396. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wood, K.; Brown, T.; Rogowski, R.; Jensen, B. Fiber optic sensors for health monitoring of morphing airframes: II. Chemical sensing using optical fibers with Bragg gratings. Smart Mater. Struct. 2000, 9, 170–174. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang, A.; Udd, E. Industrial Sensing Systems; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, December 29 2000; Volume 4202, pp. 1–116. [Google Scholar]
  15. Grattan, K.T.V.; Sun, T. Fiber optic sensor technology: an overview. Sens. Actuat. A: Phys. 2000, 82, 40–61. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sammarco, J.J.; Paddock, R.; Fries, E.F.; Karra, V.K. A Technology Review of Smart Sensors With Wireless Networks for Applications in Hazardous Work Environments Department of Health and Human Services; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Pittsburgh Research Laboratory: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, April 2007. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gordon, J.D.; Lowder, T.L.; Selfridge, R.H.; Schultz, S.M. Optical D-fibre-based volatile organic compound sensor. Appl. Opt. 2007, 46, 7805–7810. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang, A. Sensors for harsh environments II. Proceedings of SPIE Conference, Boston, MA, USA, October 23-24, 2005.
  19. Jiang, D.; Wang, A. International Conference on Sensors and control techniques (ICSC 2000), Bellingham, WA, USA, May, 2000; SPIE; 4077, pp. 1–600.
  20. Wang, A.; Marcus, M. Harsh environment sensors II. Proceedings of SPIE Conferences, Boston, MA, USA, September 19, 1999; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, December 1999; 3538. [Google Scholar]
  21. Grattan, K.T.V.; Meggitt, B.T. Optical Fiber Sensor Technology; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1998; Volume II. [Google Scholar]
  22. Grattan, K.T.V.; Meggitt, B.T. Optical Fiber Sensor Technology; Kluwer Academic: Boston, MA, USA, 1999; Volume III–IV. [Google Scholar]
  23. Culshaw, B.; Dakin, J. Optical Fiber Sensors; Artech House: Boston, MA, USA, 1988-1997; Volume I–IV. [Google Scholar]
  24. Dandridge, A.; Kirkendall, C. Passive fibre optic sensor networks. In Handbook of Optical Fibre Sensing Technology; López-Higuera, J.M., Ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 433–448. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kersey, A. Distributed and multiplexed fiber optic sensors. In Fiber Optic Sensors: An Introduction for Engineers and Scientists; Udd, E., Ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 325–368. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yin, S.; Ruffin, P.B.; Yu, F.T.S. Fiber Optic Sensors, 2nd Ed. ed; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008; pp. 1–496. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wolfbeis, O.S. Fiber-optic chemical sensors and biosensors. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 3859–3873. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wolfbeis, O.S. Fiber-optic chemical sensors and biosensors. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 4269–4283. [Google Scholar]
  29. McDonagh, C.; Burke, C.S.; MacCraith, B.D. Optical chemical sensors. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 400–422. [Google Scholar]
  30. Chu, C.S.; Lo, Y.L. High-performance fiber-optic oxygen sensors based on fluorinated xerogels doped with Pt (II) complexes. Sens. Actuat. B 2007, 1242, 376–382. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yeh, T.S.; Chu, C.S.; Lo, Y.L. Highly sensitive optical fiber oxygen sensor using Pt(II) complex embedded in sol-gel matrices. Sens. Actuat. B 2006, 119, 701–707. [Google Scholar]
  32. Epstein, J.R.; Walt, D.R. Fluorescence-based fibre optic arrays: a universal platform for sensing. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2003, 32, 203–214. [Google Scholar]
  33. Duerkop, A.; Schaeferling, M.A.; Wolfbeis, O.S. Topics in Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Glucose Sensing; Geddes, C.D., Lakowicz, J.R., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006; Volume 11, pp. 351–375. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang, Z.; Grattan, K.T.V.; Palmer, A.W. Fiber-optic high temperature sensor based on the fluorescence lifetime of alexandrite. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1992, 63, 3869–3873. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mulrooney, J.; Clifford, J.; Fitzpatrick, C.; Lewis, E. Detection of carbon dioxide emissions from a diesel engine using a mid-infrared optical fibre based sensor. Sens. Actuat. A 2007, 136, 104–110. [Google Scholar]
  36. Alfeeli, B.; Pickrell, G.; Wang, A. Sub-nanoliter spectroscopic gas sensor. Sensors 2006, 6, 1308–1320. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tao, S.; Gong, S.; Fanguy, J.C.; Hu, X. The application of a light guiding flexible tubular waveguide in evanescent wave absorption optical sensing. Sens. Actuat. B 2007, 120, 724–731. [Google Scholar]
  38. Peng, W.; Pickrell, G.R.; Shen, F.; Wang, A. Experimental investigation of optical waveguide-based multigas sensing. IEEE Photon. Tech. Lett. 2004, 16, 2317–2319. [Google Scholar]
  39. Yuan, W.; Ho, H.P.; Wong, C.L.; Kong, S.K.; Lin, C. Surface plasmon resonance biosensor incorporated in a Michelson interferometer with enhanced sensitivity. IEEE Sens. J. 2007, 7, 70–73. [Google Scholar]
  40. Stamm, C.; Dangel, R.; Lukosz, W. Biosensing with the integrated-optical difference interferometer: dual-wavelength operation. Opt. Commun. 1998, 153, 347–359. [Google Scholar]
  41. Shen, F.; Peng, W.; Cooper, K.L.; Pickrell, G.; Wang, A. UV-induced intrinsic Fabry - Perot interferometric fiber sensors. Proc. SPIE 2004, 5590, 47–56. [Google Scholar]
  42. Chang, K.A.; Lim, H.J.; Su, C.B. A fibre optic Fresnel ratio meter for measurements of solute concentration and refractive index change in fluid. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2002, 13, 1962–1965. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kashyap, R. Fiber Bragg Gratings; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  44. Claus, R.O.; Murphy, K.A.; Wang, A.; May, R.G. High temperature optical fiber sensors. In Optical Fiber Smart Materials and Structures; Udd, E., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhu, Y.; Cooper, K.L.; Pickrell, G.R.; Wang, A. Fiber-tip pressure sensor for high-temperature applications. IEEE J. Lightwave Tech. 2006, 24, 861–869. [Google Scholar]
  46. Peng, W.; Pickrell, G.R.; Wang, A. High temperature fiber optic cubic-zirconia pressure sensor. Opt. Eng. 2005, 44, 124402:1–124402:6. [Google Scholar]
  47. Huang, Z.; Peng, W.; Xu, J.; Pickrell, G.; Wang, A. Fiber temperature sensor for high-pressure environment. Opt. Eng. 2005, 44, 104401:1–104401:5. [Google Scholar]
  48. Huang, Z.; Chen, X.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, A. Wave-front splitting intrinsic Fabry-Perot fiber optic sensor. Opt. Eng. Lett. 2005, 44, 070501:1–070501:3. [Google Scholar]
  49. Shen, F.; Wang, A. Frequency estimation-based signal processing algorithm for whitelight optical fiber Fabry-Perot interferometers. Appl. Opt. 2005, 44, 5206–5214. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhao, Y.; Yu, C.; Liao, Y. Differential FBG sensor for temperature-compensated high-pressure (or displacement) measurement. Opt. Laser Technol. 2004, 36, 39–42. [Google Scholar]
  51. Pal, S.; Sun, T.; Grattan, K.T.V.; Wade, S.A.; Collins, S.F.; Baxter, G.W.; Dussardier, B.; Monnom, G. Stain-independent temperature measurement using a Type-I and Type-IIA optical fiber Bragg grating combination. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2004, 75, 1327–1331. [Google Scholar]
  52. Stewart, G.; Atherton, K.; Yu, H.; Culshaw, B. An investigation of an optical fibre amplifier loop for intra-cavity and ring-down cavity loss measurements. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2001, 12, 843–849. [Google Scholar]
  53. Atherton, K.; Stewart, G.; Culshaw, B. Gas detection by cavity ringdown absorption with a fiber optic amplifier loop. Proc. SPIE 2002, 4577, 25–31. [Google Scholar]
  54. Tarsa, P.B.; Rabinowitz, P.; Lehmann, K.K. Passive optical fiber resonator for cavity ringdown spectroscopy. Proceedings of the Abstracts of Papers, 224th ACS National Meeting, Boston, MA, USA, August 18-22, 2002.
  55. Brown, R.S.; Kozin, I.; Tong, Z.; Oleschuk, R.D.; Loock, H.P. Fiber-loop ring-down spectroscopy. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 10444–10447. [Google Scholar]
  56. Loock, H.P.; Tong, Z.; Wright, A.; Jakubinek, M. Fiber-loop ring-down: Absorption spectroscopy on picoliter samples. Proceedings of the Abstracts of Papers, 225th ACS National Meeting, New Orleans, LA, USA, March 23-27, 2003.
  57. Tong, Z.; Jakubinek, M.; Wright, A.; Gillies, A.; Loock, H.P. Fiber-loop ring-down spectroscopy: A sensitive absorption technique for small liquid samples. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2003, 74, 4818–4826. [Google Scholar]
  58. Tarsa, P.B.; Rabinowitz, P.; Lehmann, K.K. Evanescent field absorption in a passive optical fiber resonator using continuous-wave cavity ring-down spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 383, 297–303. [Google Scholar]
  59. Wang, C.; Scherrer, S.T. Fiber ringdown pressure sensors. Opt. Lett. 2004, 29, 352–354. [Google Scholar]
  60. Wang, C.; Scherrer, S.T. Fiber loop ringdown for physical sensor development: pressure sensor. Appl. Opt. 2004, 43, 6458–6464. [Google Scholar]
  61. Wang, C. Fiber ringdown temperature sensors. Opt. Eng. 2005, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, C.; Mbi, A. An alternative method to develop fibre grating temperature sensors using the fibre loop ringdown scheme. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2006, 17, 1741–1745. [Google Scholar]
  63. Mbi, A. Novel Fiber Optic Temperature Sensors: Fiber Grating Loop Ringdown. In M.S. thesis; Mississippi State University: Starkville, MS, USA, May 2006. [Google Scholar]
  64. Tarsa, P.B.; Brzozowski, D.M.; Rabinowitz, P.; Lehmann, K.K. Cavity ringdown strain gauge. Opt. Lett. 2004, 29, 1339–1341. [Google Scholar]
  65. Ni, N.; Chan, C.C.; Dong, X.Y.; Sun, J.; Shum, P. Cavity ring-down long-period fibre grating strain sensor. Meas. Sic. Technol. 2007, 18, 3135–3138. [Google Scholar]
  66. Qiu, H.; Qiu, Y.S.; Chen, Z.H.; Fu, B.Y.; Li, G.M. Strain measurement by fiber-loop ring-down spectroscopy and fiber mode converter. IEEE Sen. J. 2008, 8, 1180–1183. [Google Scholar]
  67. Ni, N.; Chan, C.C.; Xia, L.; Shum, P. Fiber cavity ring-down refractive index sensor. IEEE Photo. Technol. Lett. 2008, 20, 1351–1353. [Google Scholar]
  68. Trefiak, N.R.; Barnes, J.; Rask, F.; Courtney, D.G.; Walford, R.; Li, R.; Oleschuk, R.D.; Loock, H.P. Absorption measurements in microfluidic devices using ring-down spectroscopy. Proc. SPIE 2005, 5969, 596900:1–596900:9. [Google Scholar]
  69. Li, R.; Loock, H.P.; Oleschuk, R.D. Capillary electrophoresis absorption detection using fiber-loop ring-down spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 5685–5692. [Google Scholar]
  70. Tong, Z.; Wright, A.; McCormick, T.; Li, R.; Oleschuk, R.D.; Loock, H.P. Phase-shift fiber-loop ring-down spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 6594–6599. [Google Scholar]
  71. Loock, H.P. Ring-down absorption spectroscopy for analytical microdevices. Trends Anal. Chem. 2006, 25, 655–664. [Google Scholar]
  72. Pickrell, G.; Peng, W.; Wang, A. Random hole optical fiber evanescent wave gas sensing. Opt. Lett. 2004, 29, 1476–1478. [Google Scholar]
  73. Tao, S.Q.; Xu, L.; Fanguy, J.C. Optical fiber ammonia sensing probes using reagent immobilized porous silica coating as transducers. Sens. Actuat. B 2006, 115, 158–163. [Google Scholar]
  74. Eckhardt, H.S.; Graubner, K.; lein, K.F.; Sun, T.; Grattan, K.T.V. Fiber - optic based gas sensing in the UV region. 6083.
  75. Wang, M.; Jing, N.; Su, C.B.; Kameoka, J.; Chou, C.K.; Hung, M.C.; Chang, K.A. Electrospinning of silica nanochannels for single molecule detection. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 033106:1–033106:3. [Google Scholar]
  76. Lin, J. Recent development and applications of optical and fiber optic pH sensors. TRAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2000, 19, 541–552. [Google Scholar]
  77. Wang, X.; Xu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Cooper, K.L.; Wang, A. An all fused silica miniature optical fiber tip pressure sensor. Opt. Lett. 2006, 31, 885–887. [Google Scholar]
  78. Bhatia, V.; Wang, A.; Claus, R. Optical fiber strain sensors. In The Measurement, Instrumentation and Sensors Handbook; Webster, J.G., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  79. Zhu, Y.; Wang, A. Miniature fiber optic pressure sensor. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2005, 17, 447–449. [Google Scholar]
  80. Zhu, Y.; Shen, F.; Huang, Z.; Cooper, K.L.; Pickrell, G.R.; Wang, A.; McDaniel, J.; Pedro, T. Fiber-optic high-temperature sensing system and its field application. Proc. SPIE 2007, 6757, 675704:1–675704:8. [Google Scholar]
  81. Xu, J.; Wang, X.; Cooper, K.L.; Wang, A. Miniature fiber optic pressure and acoustic sensors. Opt. Lett. 2006, 30, 3269–3271. [Google Scholar]
  82. Zhu, Y.; Huang, Z.; Shen, F.; Wang, A. Sapphire-fiber-based white-light interferometric sensor for high-temperature measurements. Opt. Lett. 2005, 30, 711–713. [Google Scholar]
  83. Abdi, A.M.; Watkins, S.E. Strain sensor calibration using extrinsic Fabry-Perot interferometric sensors. Opt. Eng. 2007, 46, 104402–104600. [Google Scholar]
  84. Dua, R.; Watkins, S.E.; Wunsch, D.C. Demodulation of extrinsic Fabry-Perot interferometric sensors for vibration testing using neural networks. Opt. Eng. 2004, 43, 2976–2985. [Google Scholar]
  85. Chang, K.A.; Lim, H.; Su, C.B. A fiber optic reflectometer for velcocity and fraction ratio measurements in multiphase flow. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2002, 74, 3559–3565. [Google Scholar]
  86. Shen, F.; Xu, J.; Wang, A. Frequency response measurement of diaphragm-based pressure sensors by using the radiation pressure of an excimer laser pulse. Opt. Lett. 2005, 30, 1935–1937. [Google Scholar]
  87. Marazuela, M.D.; Moreno-Bondi, M.C. Fiber optic biosensors - an overview. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2002, 372, 664–682. [Google Scholar]
  88. Leung, A.; Shankar, P.M.; Mutharasan, R. A review of fiber optic biosensors. Sens. Actuat. B 2007, 125, 688–703. [Google Scholar]
  89. Borisov, S.M.; Wolfbeis, O.S. Optical biosensors. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 423–461. [Google Scholar]
  90. Zhang, Y.; Shibru, H.; Cooper, K.L.; Wang, A. A miniature fiber optic multi-cavity Fabry-Perot interferometric biosensor. Opt. Lett. 2005, 30, 1021–1023. [Google Scholar]
  91. Dinh, T.V.; Yan, F. Gene detection and multispectral imaging using SERS nanoprobes and nanostructures. In Nanotechnology in Biology and Medicine; Vo-Dinh, T., Ed.; Taylor and Francis Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  92. Lopez-Amo, M.; Abad, S. Amplified fiber-optic networks for sensor multiplexing. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 45, 6626–6631. [Google Scholar]
  93. Hodgson, C.W.; Digonnet, M.J.F.; Shaw, H.J. Large-scale interferometric fiber sensor arrays with multiple optical amplifiers. Opt. Lett. 1997, 22, 1651–1653. [Google Scholar]
  94. Abad, S.; Lopez-Amo, M.; Matias, I. Handbook of Optical Fibre Sensing Technology; López-Higuera, J.M., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002; Chapter 22; pp. 1–451. [Google Scholar]
  95. Distributed sensors. http://photonics.ece.vt.edu/multiplexing.html accessed 2009.
  96. Zhang, P.; Cerecedo-Nunez, H.H.; Qi, B.; Pickrell, G.; Wang, A. OTDR interrogation of multiplexing low-reflectance Bragg gratings based sensor system. Opt. Eng. 2003, 42, 1597–1603. [Google Scholar]
  97. Han, M.; Wang, Y.; Wang, A. Grating-assisted polarization optical time-domain reflectometry for distributed fiber-optic sensing. Opt. Lett. 2007, 32, 2028–2030. [Google Scholar]
  98. Oapos;Keefe, A.; Deacon, D.A.G. Cavity ring-down optical spectrometer for absorption measurements using pulsed laser sources. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1988, 59, 2544–2551. [Google Scholar]
  99. Busch, K.W.; Busch, M.A. (Eds.) Cavity-Ringdown Spectroscopy: an Ultratrace-Absorption Measurement Technique; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1999; Volume 720.
  100. Berden, G.; Peeters, R.; Meijer, G. Cavity ring-down spectroscopy: Experimental schemes and applications. Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2000, 19, 565–607. [Google Scholar]
  101. Paldus, B.A.; Kachanov, A.A. An historical overview of cavity-enhanced methods. Can. J. Phys. 2005, 83, 975–999. [Google Scholar]
  102. Mazurenka, M.I.; Orr-Ewing, A.J.; Peverall, R.; Ritchie, G.A.D. Cavity ring-down and cavity enhanced spectroscopy using diode lasers. Annu. Rep. Prog. Chem. Sect. C: Phys. Chem. 2005, 101, 100–142. [Google Scholar]
  103. Wang, C.; Miller, G.P.; Winstead, C.B. Cavity Ringdown Laser Spectroscopy. In Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry: Instrumentation and Applications, Theory, and Instrumentation; Meyers, R.A., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2008; p. 10734. [Google Scholar]
  104. van der Sneppen, L.; Ariese, F.; Gooijer, C.; Ubachs, W. Liquid-phase and evanescent-wave cavity ring-down spectroscopy in analytical chemistry. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2009, 2, 13–35. [Google Scholar]
  105. Lehmann, K.K. Ring-down cavity spectroscopy cell using continuous wave excitation for trace species detection. U.S. Patent 5,528,040, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  106. Paldus, B.A.; Harris, J.S., Jr.; Martin, J.; Xie, J.; Zare, R.N. Laser diode cavity ring-down spectroscopy using acousto-optic modulator stabilization. J. Appl. Phys. 1997, 82, 3199–3204. [Google Scholar]
  107. Pipino, A.C.R.; Hudgens, J.W.; Huie, R.E. Evanescent wave cavity ring-down spectroscopy with a total-internal-reflection minicavity. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1997, 68, 2978–2989. [Google Scholar]
  108. Lehmann, K.K.; Rabinowitz, P. High-finesse optical resonator for cavity ring-down spectroscopy based upon Brewster's angle prism retrorefrectors. U.S. Patent 5,973,864, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  109. Wang, C. Plasma-cavity ringdown spectroscopy (P-CRDS) for elemental and isotopic measurements. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 2007, 22, 1347–1363. [Google Scholar]
  110. Hallock, A.J.; Berman, E.S.F.; Zare, R.N. Direct monitoring of absorption in solution by cavity ring-down spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 1741–1743. [Google Scholar]
  111. von-Lerber, T.; Sigrist, M.W. Cavity ring-down principle for fiber-optic resonators: Experimental realization of bending loss and evanescent-field sensing. Appl. Opt. 2002, 41, 3567–3575. [Google Scholar]
  112. Vogler, D.E.; Muller, M.G.; Sigrist, M.W. Fiber-optical cavity sensing of hydrogen diffusion. Appl. Opt. 2004, 42, 5413–5417. [Google Scholar]
  113. Plodinec, J. Characterization and Cleanup of the Defense Nuclear Legacy; Technical Progress Report No. 54600R03; Diagnostic Instrumentation and Analysis Laboratory: Mississippi State University: Starkville, MS, USA, 2004; pp. 31–33, No. DE-FC01-04EW54600. [Google Scholar]
  114. Gupta, M.; Jiao, H.; Oapos;Keefe, A. Cavity-enhanced spectroscopy in optical fibers. Opt. Lett. 2002, 27, 1878–1880. [Google Scholar]
  115. Andachi, M.; Nakayama, T.; Kawasaki, M.; Kurokawa, S.; Loock, H.-P. Fiber-optic ring-down spectroscopy using a tunable picosecond gain-switched diode laser. Appl. Phys. B 2007, 88, 131–135. [Google Scholar]
  116. Lehmann, K.K.; Tarsa, P.B.; Rabinowitz, P. Fiber-optic based cavity ring-down spectroscopy apparatus. U.S. Patent 7,046,362, 16 May 2006. [Google Scholar]
  117. Loock, H.P.; Brown, S.; Kozin, I.; Tong, Z.; Oleschuk, R. Optical loop ring-down. U.S. Patent 6,842,548, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  118. Tarsa, P.B.; Wist, A.D.; Rabinowitz, P.; Lehmann, K.K. Single-cell detection by cavity ring-down spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, 4523–4525. [Google Scholar]
  119. Barnes, J.; Dreher, M.; Plett, K.; Brown, R.S.; Crudden, C.M.; Loock, H.P. Chemical sensor based on a long-period fibre grating modified by a functionalized polydimethylsiloxane coating. Analyst 2008, 133, 1541–1549. [Google Scholar]
  120. Wang, C. Fiber ringdown pressure/force sensors. U.S. Patent 7,241,986, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  121. Wang, C. Fiber Bragg grating loop ringdown method and apparatus. U.S. Patent 7,323,677, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  122. Mbi, A.; Wang, C. Optical superposition in double fiber loop ringdown. Proc. SPIE 2006, 6377, 6377021–6377028. [Google Scholar]
  123. Li, G.; Qiu, Y.; Chen, S.; Liu, S.; Huang, Z. Multichannel-fiber ringdown sensor based on time-division multiplexing. Opt. Lett. 2008, 33, 3022–3024. [Google Scholar]
  124. Kim, D.W.; Zhang, Y.; Cooper, K.; Wang, A. In fiber reflection mode interferometer based on a long period grating for external refractive index measurement. Appl. Opt. 2005, 44, 5368–5373. [Google Scholar]
  125. Allsop, T.; Kalli, K.; Zhou, K.; Lai, Y.; Smith, G.; Dubov, M.; Webb, D.J.; Bennion, I. Long period gratings written into a photonic crystal fibre by a femtosecond laser as directional bend sensors. Opt. Commun. 2008, 281, 5092–5096. [Google Scholar]
  126. Kim, D.W.; Shen, F.; Chen, X.; Wang, A. Simultaneous measurement of refractive index and temperature based on a reflection mode LPG and an IFPI sensor. Opt. Lett. 2005, 30, 3000–3002. [Google Scholar]
  127. Wang, C.; Srivastava, N.; Jones, B.A.; Reese, R.B. A novel multiple species ringdown spectrometer for in situ measurements of methane, carbon dioxide, and carbon isotope. Appl. Phys. B 2008, 92, 259–270. [Google Scholar]
  128. Kersey, A.D.; Dandridge, A.; Davis, A.R.; Kikendall, C.K.; Marrone, M.J.; Gross, D.G. 64-element time-division multiplexed interferometric sensor array with EDFA telemetry. Proceedings of Optical Fiber Communications Conference (OSA Technical Digest Series), Washington, DC, USA; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  129. Davis, A.R.; Kirkendall, C.K.; Dandridge, A.; Kersey, A.D. 64-channel all-optical deployable acoustic array. Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Sensors Conferences (OSA Technical Digest Series), Washington, DC, USA; 1997; 12, pp. 616–621. [Google Scholar]
  130. Liu, S.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Fei, S. A novel interrogation technique for time—division multiplexing fiber Bragg grating sensor arrays. Proc. SPIE 2007, 6781, 67812M:1–67812M:5. [Google Scholar]
  131. Cooper, D.J.F.; Coroy, T.; Smith, P.W.E. Time-division multiplexing of large serial fiber optic Bragg grating sensor arrays. Appl. Opt. 2001, 16, 2643–2654. [Google Scholar]
  132. Cranch, G.A.; Nash, P.J. Large-scale multiplexing of interferometric fiber optic sensors using TDM and DWDM. J. Lightwave Technol. 2001, 19, 687–699. [Google Scholar]
  133. Cranch, G.A.; Nash, P.J.; Kirkendall, C.K. Large-scale remotely interrogated arrays of fiber-optic interferometric sensors for underwater acoustic applications. IEEE Sens. J. 2003, 3, 19–30. [Google Scholar]
  134. Abeysinghe, D.C.; Boyd, J.T. Micromachining techniques and MEMS structures in optical interferometric sensors. In MEMS/NEMS (Handbook techniques and applications); Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 1587–1630. [Google Scholar]
  135. HITRAN 96 Database. Available online: http:\\www.hitran.com (accessed September 19, 2009).
  136. Kirkendall, C.K.; Dandridge, A. Overview of high performance fibre-optic sensing. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2004, 37, R197–R216. [Google Scholar]
  137. Diaz, S.; Lasheras, G.; López-Amo, M.; Urquhart, P.; Jáuregui, C.; López-Higuera, J.M. Wavelength-division-multiplexed distributed fiber Raman amplifier bus network for sensors. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference Optical Fibre Sensors (OFS-17), Bruges, Belgium, May 23–27, 2005; 5855, pp. 242–244.

Abbreviations

A/D
analogy to digital
ASE
amplified spontaneous emissions
CRD
cavity ringdown
CRDS
cavity ringdown spectroscopy
FBG
fiber Bragg grating
FBG-FLRD
fiber Bragg grating-fiber loop ringdown
FBG-OSA
fiber Bragg grating-optical spectral Analyzer
FLRD
fiber loop ringdown
FOS
fiber optic sensor(s)
FPI
Fabry-Perot interferometric
LPG-FLRD
long period grating-fiber loop ringdown
LPG
long period grating
MEMS
micro-electro-mechanical systems
NIR
near infrared
OSA
optical spectral analyzer
PCF
photonic crystal fiber
P
pressure
SMF
single mode fiber
TDM
time division multiplexing
T
temperature
WDM
wavelength division multiplexing
Sensors 09 07595f1 1024
Figure 1. Illustration of the CRDS concept. The presence of additional absorption in the cavity is detected by a shortening of the decay time constant (ringdown time). In the CRDS, the effective absorption path-length is readily increased more than 10,000-fold.
Figure 1. Illustration of the CRDS concept. The presence of additional absorption in the cavity is detected by a shortening of the decay time constant (ringdown time). In the CRDS, the effective absorption path-length is readily increased more than 10,000-fold.
Sensors 09 07595f1
Sensors 09 07595f2 1024
Figure 2. Fiber Loop Ringdown (FLRD) – a universal time-domain sensing scheme.
Figure 2. Fiber Loop Ringdown (FLRD) – a universal time-domain sensing scheme.
Sensors 09 07595f2
Sensors 09 07595f3 1024
Figure 3. FLRD methane sensor using a U-bracket as an air-gap (gas cell).
Figure 3. FLRD methane sensor using a U-bracket as an air-gap (gas cell).
Sensors 09 07595f3
Sensors 09 07595f4 1024
Figure 4. FLRD pressure sensor's response. (Left) gradually load (a) and unload pressures; (Right) good linearity of the sensor's response to pressures (Reproduction permission from Optical Society of America [60]).
Figure 4. FLRD pressure sensor's response. (Left) gradually load (a) and unload pressures; (Right) good linearity of the sensor's response to pressures (Reproduction permission from Optical Society of America [60]).
Sensors 09 07595f4
Sensors 09 07595f5 1024
Figure 5. FLRD temperature sensors. (Left) FBG as the sensing element showing high precision; (Right) showing high baseline stability at low and high temperatures (Reproduction permission from Institute of Physics [62]).
Figure 5. FLRD temperature sensors. (Left) FBG as the sensing element showing high precision; (Right) showing high baseline stability at low and high temperatures (Reproduction permission from Institute of Physics [62]).
Sensors 09 07595f5
Sensors 09 07595f6 1024
Figure 6. Configurations of different sensor heads.
Figure 6. Configurations of different sensor heads.
Sensors 09 07595f6
Sensors 09 07595f7 1024
Figure 7. Proposed concept of the sensor platform in a serial configuration. A platform consisting of two sensor units is used to illustrate the concept. (a) Signals from the two sensor units are coupled; Red: from Loop1; blue: from Loop2. (b) Decoupled signals from determination of P1 and P2.
Figure 7. Proposed concept of the sensor platform in a serial configuration. A platform consisting of two sensor units is used to illustrate the concept. (a) Signals from the two sensor units are coupled; Red: from Loop1; blue: from Loop2. (b) Decoupled signals from determination of P1 and P2.
Sensors 09 07595f7
Sensors 09 07595f8 1024
Figure 8. Proposed concept of the sensor platform in a parallel configuration. A platform consisting of two sensor units is used to illustrate the concept.
Figure 8. Proposed concept of the sensor platform in a parallel configuration. A platform consisting of two sensor units is used to illustrate the concept.
Sensors 09 07595f8
Sensors 09 07595f9 1024
Figure 9. Proposed multi-functional fiber optic sensor system formed by adding FLRD sensor units to the sensor platform, which consists of a light source, a detector, and FLRD sensor units.
Figure 9. Proposed multi-functional fiber optic sensor system formed by adding FLRD sensor units to the sensor platform, which consists of a light source, a detector, and FLRD sensor units.
Sensors 09 07595f9
Table
Table 1. Current FOS in terms of sensing functionalities, sensing mechanisms, and sensing schemes.
Table 1. Current FOS in terms of sensing functionalities, sensing mechanisms, and sensing schemes.
Sensing functionSensing mechanismSensing schemeSensor head configuration
Gas concentration /identificationBeer's Law based direction absorption, evanescent wave absorptionIntensity vs. frequency (spectrometer based)Air-gap, side-polished cladding, tapered bare fiber, U-bend
Gas concentration /identificationFluorescenceIntensity vs. frequency (spectrometer based), intensity vs. time (fluorescence life time based)Unmodified fibers, decladded fibers, doped cladding, excitation through central core and emission through outer fiber, bifurcated fiber bundle, U-bend decladded, tip based, tip with active cladding, etched tip, modified end-face
Chemical/ biochemical agentsAgent-induced changes of refractive indices, surface plasmon resonanceIntensity vs. wavelength (spectrometer-based), imaging of fluorescence, scatteringAgent selective polymers plus long period gratings (LPGs)in photonic crystal fiber (PCF), various forms of metal/dielectric interface
PressureMechanical deformationInterferometric spectral patternsFPI, FBG, tapered bare fiber
TemperatureThermal expansionReflected spectral patternsFBG, LPG, FPI, U-bend, doped composition fiber for high T
Stress/strainMechanical deformationReflected spectral patternsFBG, LPG, FPI, U-bend, tapered bare fiber
VibrationMechanical deformationReflective configuration due to displacement of transducerFBG, FPI
Table
Table 2. A comparison of the FBG-FLRD scheme with the FBG-OSA scheme (Both use a SMF bare FBG as the sensing element and the thermal sensitivity is ∼0.01 nm/°C) [62].
Table 2. A comparison of the FBG-FLRD scheme with the FBG-OSA scheme (Both use a SMF bare FBG as the sensing element and the thermal sensitivity is ∼0.01 nm/°C) [62].
FeaturesFBG-FLRD schemeFBG-OSA scheme
Measuring domainTimeFrequency
Sensing schemeTime constants (τ)Spectral shifts (Δλ)
Measurement resolution0.18 °C (based on 3-σ), not limited by detector2 °C, limited by OSA's spectral resolution
Detection sensitivity (if same sensing mechanism is used)Enhanced by the multiple-round trip effectSingle pass (single interaction)
Influenced by intensity fluctuations of light sourceNoYes (when the spectral shift is close to the full width at half maximum of the FBG's bandwidth curve)
Speed of detectionHigh measuring speed (up to kHz)Low
Cost of detector (or terminal equipment)Photodetector (PD) (∼$240)OSA with a resolution of ±0.02 nm (∼$5,000–8,000)
Potential for sensor multiplexingPromisingLimited by power losses, power fluctuations, ASE noise
Table
Table 3. Reported FLRD-based FOS.
Table 3. Reported FLRD-based FOS.
Sensing functionSensing mechanismSensor head configuration
Gas concentrationBeer's Law based direction absorption, evanescent wave absorptionAir-gap, tapped bare fiber, and chemically-coated LPGs [52-54,58,113,118,119]
MicrofluidicsDirection absorption, evanescent wave absorptionAir-gap, capillary [56,57,68]
Single molecular cellLight scatteringTapered fiber [118]
Biomolecules (protein analysis)AbsorptionCapillary-fiber interface [69]
Pressure/forceMechanical deformationBare single mode fiber (SMF) [59,60,120]
TemperatureThermal expansionFBG, LPG [61-63,121,122]
Stress/strainMechanical deformationFBG, bare SMF [64-66]
Refractive indexLight traveling speedLPG, bare SMF [60,67]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, C. Fiber Loop Ringdown — a Time-Domain Sensing Technique for Multi-Function Fiber Optic Sensor Platforms: Current Status and Design Perspectives. Sensors 2009, 9, 7595-7621. https://doi.org/10.3390/s91007595

AMA Style

Wang C. Fiber Loop Ringdown — a Time-Domain Sensing Technique for Multi-Function Fiber Optic Sensor Platforms: Current Status and Design Perspectives. Sensors. 2009; 9(10):7595-7621. https://doi.org/10.3390/s91007595

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Chuji. 2009. "Fiber Loop Ringdown — a Time-Domain Sensing Technique for Multi-Function Fiber Optic Sensor Platforms: Current Status and Design Perspectives" Sensors 9, no. 10: 7595-7621. https://doi.org/10.3390/s91007595

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop