Next Article in Journal
Four Eremophilane Sesquiterpenes from the Mangrove Endophytic Fungus Xylaria sp. BL321
Previous Article in Journal
Five New Amicoumacins Isolated from a Marine-Derived Bacterium Bacillus subtilis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tetrodotoxin (TTX) as a Therapeutic Agent for Pain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Toxicity of Cultured Bullseye Puffer Fish Sphoeroides annulatus

1
Centro de Investigaciones Biologicas del Noroeste (CIBNOR), Apdo. Postal 128, La Paz, B.C.S. 23000, Mexico
2
Investigacion para la Conservacion y el Desarrollo (INCODE), Andador 2, 245. Col. Banobras. La Paz, B.C.S. 23080, Mexico
3
College of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Resource Management, Pacific Aquaculture & Coastal Resources Center, University of Hawaii at Hilo, 200 W. Kawili St., Hilo, HI 96720, USA
4
Centro de Investigacion en Alimentacion y Desarrollo (CIAD), Unidad Mazatlan. Apdo. Postal 711, C.P. 82010. Mazatlan, Sinaloa 82010, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Deceased in November 2007.
Mar. Drugs 2012, 10(2), 329-339; https://doi.org/10.3390/md10020329
Submission received: 19 December 2011 / Revised: 14 January 2012 / Accepted: 18 January 2012 / Published: 3 February 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tetrodotoxin 2011)

Abstract

:
The toxin content in various life cycle stages of tank-cultivated bullseye puffer (Sphoeroides annulatus) were analyzed by mouse bioassay and ESI-MS spectrometry analysis. The presence of toxin content was determined in extracts of sperm, eggs, embryo, larvae, post-larvae, juvenile, pre-adult, and adult fish, as well as in food items used during the cultivation of the species. Our findings show that only the muscle of juveniles, the viscera of pre-adults, and muscle, liver, and gonad of adult specimens were slightly toxic (<1 mouse unit). Thus, cultivated S. annulatus, as occurs with other cultivated puffer fish species, does not represent a food safety risk to consumers. This is the first report of toxin analysis covering the complete life stages of a puffer fish under controlled conditions.

1. Introduction

Bullseye puffer fish (Sphoeroides annulatus Jenyns, 1842), known in Mexico as “botete Diana”, is consumed in the northwestern and some central states of Mexico [1,2,3,4]. About 600 tons are exported annually, making Mexico the second largest exporter of puffer fish [5]. According to previous work [5], wild S. annulatus specimens are toxic in various tissues, including the liver (22 µg tetrodotoxin (TTX)/g), gonads (0.46 µg TTX/g), and intestine (0.42 µg TTX/g), but not in the muscles. Therefore, the fillet is edible and safe when prepared by a qualified cook.
In Mexico, 37 human casualties have been linked to puffer fish consumption in the last 40 years [5,6]. Puffer fish toxicity is attributed to tetrodotoxin (TTX) and its analogs with varying degrees of toxicity [7,8]. The lethal dose of TTX for human is 0.5–2.0 mg [8]. This relates to a particular toxin profile, which is apparently determined by different environmental factors and food sources for each species of puffer fish [9,10,11]. Hence, the toxicity of puffer fish collected in different regions may vary significantly and its determination is a life-saving issue. Proper guidelines to regulate consumption of toxic puffer fish species have contributed to reduced casualties in several countries [12]. Takifugu rubripes (torafugu) and T. niphobles (kusafugu) have been successfully cultured in Japan, Korea, and China, where the contain low to no toxicity [10,11,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20], demonstrating that toxicity of cultured puffer fish depends largely on their diet. This makes cultivation an attractive economic activity. In Mexico, the techniques for production of S. annulatus in fish hatcheries were developed in the past decade [21,22,23,24] and studies of the digestive tract ontogeny and capacity for digestion of food during larval development have been reported [25]. With the increasing interest in this species as a candidate for marine aquaculture in the tropical Eastern Pacific and potential toxicity issues, it is important to determine if this puffer fish is rendered safe and non-toxic under controlled conditions of cultivation.

2. Results and Discussion

The results showed that the MBA found the presence of toxins in some extracts of cultivated S. annulatus, but in very low quantities (lower than 1 MU; less than 0.2 µg TTX/g of tissue). Only the viscera extracts of juvenile and pre-adult puffer fish, the muscles of juveniles, and the muscles, liver, and gonad of adult organisms induced mild signs of toxicity in mice (Table 1). Toxicity was indicated by rear limb paralysis and mild dyspnea. The most severe symptoms were caused by the viscera extract of pre-adult puffer fish and the liver of the adult, but all mice recovered within 1–2 h. Presence of TTX in samples of puffer fish and in Artemia nauplii, micro-particulate feed, and commercial feeds was also tested by ESI-MS analysis, indicating that whole extracts of sperm, eggs, embryo, larvae, post-larvae, and the feeds lack the peak at 319.9 m/z that correspond to TTX (Figure 1). In contrast, viscera tissue of pre-adults did show a peak at 319.9 m/z, indicating the presence of TTX (Figure 1).
The lack of toxicity in pre-adult muscle and the presence of TTX in pre-adult viscera confirmed our previous findings [5], suggesting that the toxin is redistributed among tissues during fish development.
Noguchi and Arakawa [11] collected more than 6000 specimens of T. rubripes from eight sites in Japan from 1981 through 2003. Specimens cultivated with nontoxic diets in net cages at sea or in aquaria were nontoxic, the liver toxicity never exceeded 2–10 MU/g, using an accepted TTX bioassay. Ji et al. [26] reported 565 nontoxic puffer fish cultivated in farms and net cages at sea. Specimens were tested during a year, based on a mouse bioassay for TTX.
Table 1. Toxicity of cultured puffer fish Sphoeroides annulatus and feed analyzed for tetrodotoxin (TTX) content.
Table 1. Toxicity of cultured puffer fish Sphoeroides annulatus and feed analyzed for tetrodotoxin (TTX) content.
SampleTissue/CharacteristicsMouse Bioassay Equiv. (µg/g)Clinical SignsDetection of TTX (ESI-MS)
SpermComplete___
EggsComplete___
EmbryoComplete___
LarvaeComplete___
Post-larvaeComplete___
JuvenilesMuscle_+ a+
Viscera *_+ a-
JuvenilesMuscle_+ a+
Viscera *_+ a-
Pre-adultsMuscle___
Intestines___
Liver_+ a+
Skin___
Pre-adultsMuscle___
Intestines_++
Liver_+ a+
Skin___
AdultsMuscle_++
Gonads_++
Intestines___
Liver_++
Skin___
Artemia sp. nauplii___
Microalgae mix ___
Feed (1) ___
Feed (2) ___
TTXSTD0.2+ b+
Vehicule0.1 N HCl___
a Rear limb paralysis and mild dyspnea; b Rear limb paralysis, mild dyspnea, convulsions, jumping, and death. * Viscera: Liver and intestines.
TTX transfer/accumulation profiles in the puffer fish body have been previously studied [27]. Kono et al. [28] studied non-toxic, cultivated juvenile Fugu niphobles fed a diet containing highly toxic natural Fugu poecilonotus liver for 30 days. They found that a part of the TTX accumulated in the liver from the diet was transferred to the skin. Wang et al. [29] studied toxin accumulation in hybrid specimens of puffer fish, Takifugu niphobles × T. rubripes and transfer/accumulation profiles in the puffer fish body. They find that part of the TTX is first accumulated in the liver and then transferred/accumulated in the skin in male specimens and in the ovary in female specimens. TTX that is intramuscularly administered to nontoxic, cultivated T. rubripes was rapidly transferred from the muscle via the blood to other organs. Little TTX was retained in the liver, and most (>96%) of the toxin remained in the skin. Immunohistochemical assay revealed that the toxin accumulated in the skin was localized in the basal cells of the epidermal layer [30].
Figure 1. ESI mass spectra analysis of Sphoeroides annulatus at various developmental stages and of the feed used during cultivation: (A) juvenile (viscera); (B) pre-adult (muscle); (C) pre-adult (viscera); (D) Artemia nauplii; (E) Artificial feed; (F) TTX standard (319.9 m/z).
Figure 1. ESI mass spectra analysis of Sphoeroides annulatus at various developmental stages and of the feed used during cultivation: (A) juvenile (viscera); (B) pre-adult (muscle); (C) pre-adult (viscera); (D) Artemia nauplii; (E) Artificial feed; (F) TTX standard (319.9 m/z).
Marinedrugs 10 00329 g001
The low toxicity of puffer fish cultivated under controlled conditions is safe for human consumption. The extracts of tissue from these nontoxic puffer fish could be used to enrich culture media for TTX-producing bacteria [31]. With increasing interest in applying TTX as an analgesic and anesthetic, further studies are recommended that focus on manipulating toxicity of puffer fish to determine potential medical uses.
In our study, the origin of the toxin was not determined and still remains an open question. Various researchers [9,11,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40] consider some TTX-producing bacteria, such as Vibrio, Pseudomonas, Schewanella, Microbacterium, Serratia, Nocardiopsis, Bacillus, Actinomycetes, Aeromonas, and Lysinibacillus may be involved in puffer fish toxicity [33,34,35,36,39,40,41,42,43,44]. The biological role of TTX has been described as a defense mechanism [45] and also as a pheromone [46]. Saito et al. [47] reported evidence about attraction between the puffer fish T. rubripes fed food containing TTX.
Cultivation of innocuous puffer fish T. rubripes and F. niphobles have been reported [10,11,13,15,20]. However, other authors reported low quantities of TTX in these species in embryos and adult intestine [16,18,19]. The TTX content was analyzed by the monoclonal antibody method [18], which is more sensitive (nanograms) than the MBA used by Matsui et al. [13]. In our study, TTX was detected by MS-ESI, a highly sensitive method. Toxicity of cultivated puffer fish species is summarized in Table 2.
Table 2. Toxicity of cultured puffer fish.
Table 2. Toxicity of cultured puffer fish.
SpeciesToxicityAnalysisCountryReference
Fugu niphobles<1 MUMBAJapan[14]
9–20 ng (<1 MU)EIAJapan[18]
Takifugu rubripes<1 MUMBAJapan[15]
0.1–0.2 MUMBA, LC-FLDJapan[16]
0.1–130 ng (<1 MU)EIAJapan[17]
2–10 MU
<10 MU–624 MUMBA, LC-MSJapan[10,11,20,48]
MBATaiwan[19]
Takifugu obscures T. rubripes, T. obscurus, T. floridus, T. bimaculatus<10 MUMBAChina[49]
<1 MUMBAKorea[50]
<10 MU–125 MUMBAChina[26]
Sphoeroides annulatus<1 MUMBA, ESI-MSMexicoThis study
MBA: Mouse bioassay; MU: Mouse unit (equivalent to 0.2 µg of TTX/g); HPLC-FLD: High performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence detector; EIA: Indirect competitive enzyme immunoassay; LC-MS: Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; ESI-MS: Electrospray interface-mass spectrometry.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Puffer Fish Samples

Samples of sperm, eggs, embryos, larvae, post-larvae, juvenile, pre-adult, and adult specimens of S. annulatus were obtained from a closed hatchery culture system carried out at CIAD in Mazatlan Mexico (Figure 2, Table 3). Adult female fish were maintained under hatchery conditions and examined for egg maturity, based on oocyte size by gonadal biopsy. Fish with oocytes larger than 0.5 mm were hormone-treated with LHRHa over 48 h [24]. Three days after the hormone treatment, eggs and sperm were obtained by manual stripping; fecundation was induced by mixing eggs and sperm in seawater. Fertilized eggs were incubated in 600 L tanks with UV-treated and cartridge (20 μm)-filtered seawater at 28 °C. After 72 h, the eggs started to hatch and at day 4 post-hatch (DPH), the yolk sac of fish larvae was completely absorbed. First feeding of larvae started on DPH 4 with a mix of microalgae (Nannochloropsis sp., Isochrysis sp.) at a density of 100,000 cell/mL and rotifers (Brachionus rotundiformis) at a density of 5–10 rotifers/mL until DPH 16. Artemia nauplii was fed to the fish from DPH 16 through 29 at a density of 1–5 artemia/mL. Weaning on an artificial microdiet started at day 29 and ended at DPH 34. The artificial microdiet diet was fed in excess. It had a proximate composition of 49.5% protein, 8.8% lipid, 9.7% ash, and 92.4% dry matter. It was prepared with Artemia decapsulated cysts (80% total protein) and fish meal (20% total protein) as protein sources [51]. The microdiet was offered to the fish four times each day; the particle size was increased according to the fish size, ranging from 150–300 to 300–500 µm.
Figure 2. Analysis of toxicity of Sphoeroides annulatus at stages of development during cultivation.
Figure 2. Analysis of toxicity of Sphoeroides annulatus at stages of development during cultivation.
Marinedrugs 10 00329 g002
Table 3. Samples of Sphoeroides annulatus and feeds analyzed for TTX content.
Table 3. Samples of Sphoeroides annulatus and feeds analyzed for TTX content.
Sample/developmentAmount (weight or organisms)/age (days or months)Characteristics (Size: mm; Weight: g)
Sperm3 gFrom 2 males born in captivity, 36 months
Eggs20 gFrom one female born in captivity, 36 months (246 mm and 620 g)
Embryo10 g; 2 days after fecundationObtained in June 2004
Larva5 g; 2 days after eclosionObtained in June 2004
Post-larva150 organisms (1.5 months)(average: 13.2 ± 2.14 mm and 1 ± 0.27 g)
Juvenile70 organisms (4 months) 1(average: 47.16 ± 2.85 mm and 3.29 ± 0.73 g)
Juvenile6 organisms (16 months) 1(average: 105.63 ± 8.96 mm and 34.04 ± 3.9 g)
Pre-adult6 organisms (20 months) 2(average: 172.5 ± 10.36 mm and 137.54 ± 37.37 g)
Pre-adult5 organisms (24 months) 2(average: 173.0 ± 13.50 mm and 149.6. ± 8.15 g)
Adults5 organisms (36 months) 3(average: 215.5 ± 12.15 mm and 260.2 ± 22.45 g) Obtained in 2007
Artemia sp. (nauplii)10 gObtained in June 2004
Microalgae mix10 gObtained in June 2007
Feed (1)10 gProduced in July 2004
Feed (2)10 gProduced in July 2007
1 Dissected: Viscera and muscle; 2 Intestines, liver, muscle, skin; 3 Gonad, intestines, liver, muscle, skin.
After the fish reached 1 g, fish were transferred to 3 m 3 circular fiber glass tanks where feeding continued with a shrimp commercial feed with protein content of 32%. Seawater was maintained at normal seawater temperature and salinity of the season, which varied from 21.2 to 29.4 °C and from 32.6 to 35.1 ppt salinity. Samples of the different fish developmental stages, live food, and artificial feeds used were frozen at −20 °C and shipped on ice to the CIBNOR for toxin analysis.

3.2. Toxicity Assay

For the mouse bioassay, the fish and tissue samples were homogenized in 1:1 proportion with 0.1 N HCl with a blender, boiled for 5 min, and adjusted to pH 3 with 1 N HCl. The supernatant containing the toxin was obtained by centrifugation at 1100× g for 5 min and stored at 4 °C until used. CD-1 male mice weighing 18–23 g each, in groups of three, were injected intraperitoneally with aliquots of the toxin extract. Toxicity was determined by the average surviving time, according to a standard dose-lethal time plot prepared with commercial TTX (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA). In this assay, one mouse unit of TTX, defined as the amount of toxin necessary to kill the mouse in 7–15 min, corresponded to 0.2 µg TTX. Toxicity is expressed as the concentration of TTX-equivalents (µg/g fish sample) [5].

3.3. ESI-MS Analysis

The electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) analysis (1100 spectrometer, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to determine TTX, following the recommendations of Shoji et al. [52]. For this, the samples were centrifuged at 10,000× g for 15 min (Beckman-Coulter microfuge E, Brea, CA, USA). The supernatant was filtered (0.22 µm millipore membrane) and mixed with ammonium formate in 4:1 proportion (40 µL extract and 10 µL ammonium formate) before analysis in the ESI-MS system.
Compound mass spectrum list report-MS. Acquisition parameter: mass range mode (Std/Normal); ion polarity (positive): ion source type (ESI); dry temperature (set) (350 °C); nebulizer (set) (40.00 psi); dry gas (set) (9.00 L/min); trap drive (33.2); skim 1 (33.8 V); skim 2 (6.0 V); octopole RF amplitude (150.0 V pp); capillary exit (106.6 V); capillary exit offset (72.8 V); scan begin (300 m/z); scan end (400 m/z); averages (8 spectra); maximum acceleration time (200,000 µs); ICC target (30,000).

4. Conclusions

In summary, cultivated bullseye puffer fish appear to be innocuous, if the lethal dose of TTX is 0.5–2.0 mg for a 50 kg person [9]. We found that the amount of TTX in cultivated S. annulatus tissues is 1000 times lower.

Acknowledgements

We thank Heber Castillo (Agilent Technologies, Mexico), Francisco Hernández-Sandoval and Daniel Ceseña-Ojeda (CIBNOR), Gabriel Dominguez-Solis (ITESCHAM), Gabriela Velasco, and Noemi Garcia (CIAD) for technical support. Ira Fogel (CIBNOR) provided important editorial corrections. Thanks to Oscar Armendáriz Ruiz (CIBNOR) for preparing the figures of the developmental stages of S. annulatus. We also thank three anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Castellanos, R.S.; García, R.J.L.; Guevara, O.J.L.; Franco, A.F.C. Aportación al conocimiento de la especie Sphoeroides annulatus (Jenyns). Memorias para obtener el título de Biólogo Pesquero; Escuela de Ciencias del Mar; Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa: Mazatlán, Sinaloa, Mexico, 1982; pp. 1–42. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ocampo-Peraza, D. El Botete (Sphoeroides annulatus): Características y origen como alimento humano. In Ciencias del Mar; Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, 1983; Volume 2, pp. 9–11. [Google Scholar]
  3. García Ortega, A. Estado actual de la investigación y producción del botete diana Sphoeroides annulatus. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Aquaculture Forum, Hermosillo, Mexico, 28–30 November 2007; González-Félix, M.L., Bringas-Alvarado, L., Pérez-Velázquez, M., Meza-García, S., Eds.; pp. 58–83.
  4. Chávez-Sánchez, C.M.; Álvarez-Lajonchére, L.; Abdo de la Parra, I.; García-Aguilar, N. Advances in the culture of the Mexican bullseye puffer fish Sphoeroides annulatus, Jenyns (1842). Aquac. Res. 2008, 39, 718–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Núñez-Vázquez, E.J.; Yotsu-Yamashita, M.; Sierra-Beltrán, A.P.; Yasumoto, T.; Ochoa, J.L. Toxicities and distribution of tetrodotoxin in the tissues of puffer fish found in the coast of the Baja California Peninsula, Mexico. Toxicon 2000, 38, 729–734. [Google Scholar]
  6. Poot-Delgado, C.A.; Núñez-Vázquez, E.J.; Ruiz-Ibáñez, A.J. Intoxicaciones humanas por consumo de peces botete (Tetraodontidae) en Campeche, México. In Proceedings of Resúmenes in extenso. Congreso Nacional de Ciencias y Tecnología del Mar, Secretaria de Educación Pública, Nuevo Guaymas, Mexico, 7–9 September 2011.
  7. Kao, C.Y. Tetrodotoxin, Saxitoxin and their significance in the study of excitation phenomena. Pharmacol. Rev. 1966, 18, 997–1049. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yasumoto, T.; Yotsu-Yamashita, M. Chemical and etiological Studies on tetrodotoxin and its analogs. Toxin Rev. 1996, 15, 81–90. [Google Scholar]
  9. Yoshikawa-Ebesu, J.S.M.; Hokama, Y.; Noguchi, T. Tetrodotoxin. In Foodborne Disease Handbook: Seafood and Environmental Toxins, 2nd; Hui, Y.H., Kitts, D., Stanfield, P.G., Eds.; Marcel Deckker: New York, NY, USA, 2000; Volume 4, pp. 253–286. [Google Scholar]
  10. Noguchi, T.; Arakawa, O.; Takatani, T. TTX accumulation in pufferfish. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part D 2006, 1, 145–152. [Google Scholar]
  11. Noguchi, T.; Arakawa, O. Tetrodotoxin-distribution and accumulation in aquatic organisms, and cases of human intoxication. Mar. Drugs 2008, 6, 220–242. [Google Scholar]
  12. Noguchi, T.; Yoshikawa-Ebesu, S.M. Puffer poisoning: Epidemiology and treatment. Toxin Rev. 2001, 20, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  13. Matsui, T.; Hamada, S.; Konosu, S. Difference in accumulation of puffer fish toxin and crystalline tetrodotoxin in the puffer fish, Fugu rubripes rubripes. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish 1981, 47, 535–537. [Google Scholar]
  14. Matsui, T.; Sato, H.; Hamada, S.; Shimizu, C. Comparison of toxicity of the cultured and wild puffer fish Fugu niphobles. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish 1982, 48, 253. [Google Scholar]
  15. Saito, T.; Maruyama, J.; Kanoh, S.; Jeon, J.K.; Noguchi, T.; Harada, T.; Murata, O.; Hashimoto, K. Toxicity of the cultured puffer fish Fugu rubripes rubripes, along with their resistibility against tetrodotoxin. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish 1984, 50, 1573–1575. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sato, S.; Komaru, K.; Ogata, T. Ocurrence of tetrodotoxin in cultured puffer. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish 1990, 56, 1129–1131. [Google Scholar]
  17. Matsumura, K. Tetrodotoxin Concentrations in Cultured Puffer Fish, Fugu rubripes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996, 44, 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  18. Matsumura, K. Production of tetrodotoxin in puffer fish embryos. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1998, 6, 217–219. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lin, S.I.; Chai, T.; Jung, S.S.; Hwang, D.F. Toxicity of the puffer Takifugu rubripes cultured in northern Taiwan. Fish. Sci. 1998, 64, 766–770. [Google Scholar]
  20. Noguchi, T.; Arakawa, O.; Takatani, T. Toxicity of pufferfish Takifugu rubripes cultured in netcages at sea or aquaria on land. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part D 2006, 1, 153–157. [Google Scholar]
  21. Abdo de la Parra, L.; García-Ortega, A.; Martínez-Rodríguez, L.; González-Rodríguez, B.; Velasco, G.; Hernández, C.; Duncan, N.J. Larval Rearing of the Mexican Bullseye Puffer Sphoeroides annulatus under Hatchery Conditions. In Proceedings of Larvae 2001: Fish and Shellfish Larviculture Symposium, Ghent, Belgium, 3–6 September 2001; Hendry, C.I., van Stappen, G., Wille, M., Sorgeloos, P., Eds.; European Aquaculture Society Special Publication: Ghent, Belgium, 2001; 30, pp. 4–7. [Google Scholar]
  22. García-Ortega, A.; Hernández, C.; Abdo de la Parra, L.; González-Rodríguez, B. Advances in the Nutrition and Feeding of the Bullseye Puffer Sphoeroides annulatus. In Proceedings of the VI International Symposium on Aquatic Nutrition, Cancún, México, 3–6 September 2002; Cruz-Suárez, L.E., Ricque-Marie, D., Tapia-Salazar, M., Gaxiola-Cortés, M.G., Simoes, N., Eds.; pp. 187–196.
  23. Duncan, N.J.; Rodriguez, M.O.G.A.; Alok, D.; Zohar, Y. Effects of controlled delivery and acute injections of LHRHa on bullseye puffer fish (Sphoeroides annulatus) spawning. Aquaculture 2003, 218, 625–635. [Google Scholar]
  24. García-Ortega, A. Nutrition and feeding research in the spotted rose snapper (Lutjanus guttatus) and bullseye puffer (Sphoeroides annulatus), new species for marine aquaculture. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2009, 35, 69–80. [Google Scholar]
  25. García-Gasca, A.; Galaviz, M.; Gutiérrez, J.; García-Ortega, A. Development of the digestive tract, trypsin activity and gene expression in eggs and larvae of the bullseye puffer fish (Sphoeroides annulatus). Aquaculture 2006, 251, 366–376. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ji, Y.; Liu, Y.; Gong, Q.L.; Zhou, L.; Wang, Z.P. Toxicity of puffer fish and seasonal variations in China. Aquac. Res. 2011, 42, 1186–1196. [Google Scholar]
  27. Honda, S.; Arakawa, O.; Takatani, T.; Tachibana, K.; Yagi, M.; Tanigawa, A.; Noguchi, T. Toxification of cultured puffer fish Takifugu rubripes by feeding on tetrodotoxin-containing diet. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish 2005, 71, 815–820. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kono, M.; Matsui, T.; Furukawa, K.; Yotsu-Yamashita, M.; Yamamori, K. Accumulation of tetrodotoxin and 4,9-anhydrotetrodotoxin in cultured juvenile Kusafugu Fugu niphobles by dietary administration of natural toxic Komanfugu Fugu poecilonotus liver. Toxicon 2008, 51, 1269–1273. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang, J.; Araki, T.; Tatsuno, R.; Nina, S.; Ikeda, K.; Hamasaki, M.; Sakakura, Y.; Takatani, T.; Arakawa, O. Transfer profile of intramuscular administered tetrodotoxin to artificial hybrid specimens of puffer fish, Takifugu rubripes and Takifugu niphobles. Toxicon 2011, 58, 565–569. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ikeda, K.; Murakami, Y.; Emoto, Y.; Ngy, L.; Taniyama, S.; Yagi, M.; Takatani, T.; Arakawa, O. Transfer profile of intramuscularly administered tetrodotoxin to non-toxic cultured specimens of the pufferfish Takifugu rubripes. Toxicon 2009, 53, 99–103. [Google Scholar]
  31. Him, Y.C. Detection and Biosynthesis of Puffer Fish Toxin from Bacterial Culture for Novel Medical Method Application. Master’s Thesis, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China, 2007; pp. 1–128. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yasumoto, T.; Nagai, H.; Yasumura, D.; Michishita, T.; Endo, A.; Yotsu, M.; Kotaki, Y. Interspecies distribution and posible origin of tetrodotoxin. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1986, 479, 44–51. [Google Scholar]
  33. Yotsu-Yamashita, M.; Yamazaki, T.; Meguro, Y.; Endo, A.; Murata, M.; Naoki, H.; Yasumoto, T. Production of tetrodotoxin and its derivatives by Pseudomonas sp. isolated from the skin of a pufferfish. Toxicon 1987, 25, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Noguchi, T.; Hwang, D.F.; Arakawa, O.; Sugita, H.; Deguchi, Y.; Shida, Y.; Hashimoto, K. Vibrio alginolyticus, a tetrodotoxin-producing bacterium, in the intestines of the fish Fugu vermicularis vermicularis. Mar. Biol. 1987, 94, 625–630. [Google Scholar]
  35. Matsui, T.; Taketsugu, S.; Kodama, K.; Ishi, A.; Yamamori, K.; Shimizu, C. Production of Tetrodotoxin by the Intestinal Bacteria of a Puffer Fish Takifugu niphobles. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish 1989, 55, 2199–2203. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lee, M.J.; Jeong, D.Y.; Kim, W.S.; Kim, H.D.; Kim, C.H.; Park, W.W.; Park, Y.H.; Kim, K.S.; Kim, H.M.; Kim, D.S. A Tetrodotoxin-Producing Vibrio Strain, LM-1, from the Puffer Fish Fugu vermicularis radiatus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 1698–1701. [Google Scholar]
  37. Miyasawa, K.; Noguchi, T. Distribution and origin of tetrodotoxin. Toxin Rev. 2001, 20, 11–33. [Google Scholar]
  38. Yu, C.F.; Yu, P.H.F.; Chan, P.L.; Yan, Q.; Wong, P.K. Two novel species of tetrodotoxin producing bacteria isolated from toxic marine puffer species. Toxicon 2002, 44, 641–647. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wu, Z.; Xie, L.; Xia, G.; Zhang, J.; Nie, Y.; Hu, J.; Wang, S.; Zhang, R. A new tetrodotoxin-producing actinomycete, Nocardiopsis dassonvillei, isolated from the ovaries of puffer fish Fugu rubripes. Toxicon 2005, 45, 851–859. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wu, Z.; Yang, Y.; Xie, L.; Xia, G.; Hu, J.; Wang, S.; Zhang, R. Toxicity and distribution of tetrodotoxin-producing bacteria in puffer fish Fugu rubripes collected from the Bohai Sea of China. Toxicon 2005, 46, 471–476. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yu, C.F.; Yu, P.H.; Chan, P.L.; Yan, Q.; Wong, P.K. Two novel species of tetrodotoxin-producing bacteria isolated from toxic marine puffer fishes. Toxicon 2004, 44, 641–647. [Google Scholar]
  42. Campbell, S.; Harada, R.M.; DeFelice, S.V.; Bienfang, P.K.; Li, Q.X. Bacterial production of tetrodotoxin in the pufferfish Arothron hispidus. Nat. Prod. Res. 2009, 23, 1630–1640. [Google Scholar]
  43. Yang, G.; Xu, J.; Liang, S.; Ren, D.; Yan, X.; Bao, B. A novel TTX-producing Aeromonas isolated from the ovary of Takifugu obscurus. Toxicon 2010, 56, 324–329. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang, J.; Fan, Y.; Yao, Z. Isolation of a Lysinibacillus fusiformis strain with tetrodotoxin-producing ability from puffer fish Fugu obscurus and the characterization of this strain. Toxicon 2010, 4, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kodama, M.; Ogata, T.; Sato, S. External secretion of tetrodotoxin from puffer fishes stimulated by electric shock. Mar. Biol. 1985, 87, 199–202. [Google Scholar]
  46. Matsumura, K. Tetrodotoxin as a pheromone. Nature 1995, 378, 563–564. [Google Scholar]
  47. Saito, T.; Kageyu, K.; Goto, H.; Murakami, K.; Noguchi, T. Tetrodotoxin attracts puffer fishes (torafugu Takifugu rubripes). Toxicon 1997, 34, 489. [Google Scholar]
  48. Noguchi, T.; Takatani, T.; Arawaka, O. Toxicity of Puffer Fish Cultured in Netcages. J. Food Hyg. Soc. Jpn. 2004, 45, 146–149. [Google Scholar]
  49. Jin, C.; Liu, Y.; Song, L.; Zhu, J. Comparision of the toxicities of wild and cultured Fugu obscurus. Acta Hydrobiol. Sinica 2002, 26, 192–193. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kim, D.-Y.; Kim, J.-W.; Park, K.-S.; Kang, H.-W.; Jeon, J.-K.; Chung, J.-K.; Choi, S.H.; Choi, M.-S.; Park, K.H. Possible existence of tetrodotoxin-like in cultured river puffer fish, Takifugu obscurus. J. Fish Pathol. 2009, 22, 67–73. [Google Scholar]
  51. García-Ortega, A.; Abdo de la Parra, L.; Hernández, C. Weaning of bullseye puffer (Sphoeroides annulatus) from live food to microparticulate diets made with decapsulated cyst of Artemia and fish meal. Aquac. Int. 2003, 11, 183–194. [Google Scholar]
  52. Shoji, Y.; Yotsu-Yamashita, M.; Miyazawa, T.; Yasumoto, T. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry of tetrodotoxin and its analogs: liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry, tandem mass spectometry, and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Biochem. 2001, 290, 10–17. [Google Scholar]
  • Sample availability: Available from the authors.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nuñez-Vazquez, E.J.; Garcia-Ortega, A.; Campa-Cordova, A.I.; De la Parra, I.A.; Ibarra-Martinez, L.; Heredia-Tapia, A.; Ochoa, J.L. Toxicity of Cultured Bullseye Puffer Fish Sphoeroides annulatus. Mar. Drugs 2012, 10, 329-339. https://doi.org/10.3390/md10020329

AMA Style

Nuñez-Vazquez EJ, Garcia-Ortega A, Campa-Cordova AI, De la Parra IA, Ibarra-Martinez L, Heredia-Tapia A, Ochoa JL. Toxicity of Cultured Bullseye Puffer Fish Sphoeroides annulatus. Marine Drugs. 2012; 10(2):329-339. https://doi.org/10.3390/md10020329

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nuñez-Vazquez, Erick J., Armando Garcia-Ortega, Angel I. Campa-Cordova, Isabel Abdo De la Parra, Lilia Ibarra-Martinez, Alejandra Heredia-Tapia, and Jose L. Ochoa. 2012. "Toxicity of Cultured Bullseye Puffer Fish Sphoeroides annulatus" Marine Drugs 10, no. 2: 329-339. https://doi.org/10.3390/md10020329

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop