Next Article in Journal
Pentachlorophenol-Induced Cytotoxic, Mitogenic, and Endocrine-Disrupting Activities in Channel Catfish, Ictalurus punctatus
Previous Article in Journal
Association of Clinical Complications with Nutritional Status and the Prevalence of Leukopenia among Arsenic Patients in Bangladesh
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Arsenic-Induced Genotoxic and Cytotoxic Effects in Human Keratinocytes, Melanocytes and Dendritic Cells

by
Barbara Graham-Evans
1,
Hari H. P. Cohly
2,
Hongtao Yu
3 and
Paul B. Tchounwou
1,*
1
Molecular Toxicology Research Laboratory, NIH-Center for Environmental Health, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS 39217, USA
2
Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
3
Department of Chemistry, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS 39217, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2004, 1(2), 83-89; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph2004020083
Submission received: 25 March 2004 / Accepted: 30 June 2004 / Published: 30 September 2004

Abstract

:
Arsenical keratosis and skin cancer are among the most common health effects associated with acute and chronic exposures to arsenic. This study examines the acute and chronic dose-responses of arsenic in established human cell lines using keratinocytes (HaCaT), melanocytes (CRL1675) and dendritic cells (THP-1 + A23187). Chronic conditions were established by treating the three cell lines with at least 8 passages in 0.2 µg/mL arsenic trioxide. Cytotoxicity was assessed using the fluorescein diacetate assay after 72 hrs of exposure. Single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet assay) was used to measure DNA damage. Acute exposure to arsenic had LD10 and LD25 values of 0.38 µg/mL and 3.0 µg/mL for keratinocytes; 0.19 µg/mL and 0.38 µg/mL for melanocytes; and 0.38 µg/mL and 0.75 µg/mL for dendritic cells. Cytotoxicity assays for chronically exposed cells resulted in LD10, and LD25 values of 0.4 µg/mL and 0.8 µg/mL for keratinocytes; 0.10 µg/mL and 0.20 µg/mL for melanocytes; and 0.10 µg/mL and 1.0 µg/mL for dendritic cells. The Comet assay showed that arsenic was highly genotoxic to the three cell lines. No significant differences (p > 0.05) in DNA cleavage were observed between acute and chronic exposures. In acute exposure arsenic genotoxicity was more severe with dendritic cells while melanocytes were more sensitive to arsenic cytotoxicity. Similarly, chronically exposed dendritic cells showed the maximum genotoxic damage while melanocytes were more sensitive to arsenic cytotoxicity. In conclusion, this research shows that arsenic is dermatotoxic, showing a high degree of genotoxicity and cytotoxicity to skin cells.

Introduction

Arsenic exposure has been associated with skin keratosis and the development of many cancers, especially of the skin, lung and bladder, prostate, kidney and liver [1]. Low dose ingestion of arsenic does not immediate fatal consequences, however, prolonged arsenic exposure have been shown to significantly increase the risk of contracting these various forms of cancer. Because of increased risk of cancer associated with inorganic arsenic, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) has classified inorganic arsenic as a class A (known) human carcinogen [2].
Following long-term exposure to arsenic, the first changes usually observed in the skin include pigmentation changes and then hyperkeratosis. Changes in pigmentation of skin are related to alterations brought about in the components of the epidermal-melanin unit. Chronic exposure to arsenic frequently results in skin cancers [3,4]. The skin is made up of two main layers, epidermis and dermis. The epidermis, outermost layer, provides the first barrier of protection from the invasion of foreign substances into the body. The principal epithelial cells of the epidermis are the keratinocytes. The dermis contains the melanocytes that migrate to the basal layer of the epidermis and reside there. Epidermis and surface epithelium dendritic cells are made up of immature cells known as Langerhan cells [5]. The dendritic cells arise in the bone marrow and migrate to and seed tissues throughout the body including the epidermis. The ratio for melanocytes: basal keratinocytes is 1: 10 [6] and the ratio of dendritic cells to keratinocytes is 1:10 [7].
Arsenic has been found to be genotoxic [8]. Hei suggested that arsenic acts through a series of chemical reactions in the cell, interacting strongly with nearby molecules, and changing the structure of cellular components such as DNA [9]. Other studies have found that exposure to inorganic arsenic increases the frequency of micronuclei, chromosome aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges both in humans and experimental animals [10,11]. Arsenic has been previously shown not to affect DNA directly, but to intensify the toxic effects of other physical and chemical agents by inhibiting DNA repair, changing cell redox potential, and altering DNA methylation of cell-cycle control proteins [8]. In this study we evaluated the genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of arsenic in established human cell lines represented by keratinocytes (HaCaT), melanocytes (CRL1675), and dendritic cells (THP-1+A23187) [12], following acute and chronic exposures.

Materials and Methods

Reagents and Cell Lines

Arsenic trioxide with 99.9% purity was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Suwanee, GA) and used throughout the experiments without further purifications. Reagents were purchased from Gibco (Grand Island, NY). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was obtained from Hyclone Laboratories (Logan, UT). HaCaT cell line was obtained from Dr. N. Fusenig (Division of in vitro Differentiation and Carcinogenesis, German Cancer Research Center, Germany). THP-1 and melanocytes (CRL1675) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). The cells were cultured in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37 o C.
The standard growth medium was prepared according to recommendations for specific cell lines including Dulbecco’s Minimum Essential Medium for HaCaT, RPMI 1640 for THP-1 (dendritic cells), and Vitacell medium for melanocytes (CRL 1675). Media were considered complete with the addition of 10% FBS and 1% antibiotic (penicillin and streptomyocin).

Cell Treatment for Acute Cytotoxicity

Cytotoxicity assay was carried out as previously described in our laboratory [13]. Briefly, cells were counted (20,000cells/well) and resuspended in complete medium. Aliquots of 100µl of cell suspension were placed in wells of microtiter plates, and 100µL of different concentrations of arsenic trioxide (0 to 200µg/mL) were used to treat the cells. The plates were incubated for 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively. After incubation, cells were centrifuged, washed twice with PBS, PBS discarded and aliquots of 100µL of fluorescein diacetate (10ng/mL) added. The plates were incubated 35 min before being read using a Fluroskan II microplate reader (Helsinki, Finland) with an excitation wavelength of 485 nm, and an emission wavelength of 538 nm.

Cell Treatment for Chronic Cytotoxicity

In preliminary studies, several different doses of arsenic (< LD10) were used to grow cells by trial and error. After 3-4 passages, we encountered very sluggish growth with eventual cell death due to arsenic toxicity. In our experience with HaCaT, we found 0.2ppm to be well tolerated. Further literature research showed that 0.5 and 1.0µM (0.10-0.2 ppm) could be used in HaCaT for 5 months [4]. Thus, we arbitrarily chose 0.2ppm as our working dose to represent chronic exposure. The use of THP-1 +A23187 to mimic dendritic cells [12] was due to the fact that dendritic cells are found in the surface epithelium along with keratinocytes and melanocytes.

Cell Treatment for Genotoxicity

Cells were counted (10,000 cells/well) and re-suspended in media with 10% FBS. Aliquots of 100µL of the cell suspension were placed in 96 well plates, treated with arsenic trioxide concentrations at doses of LD10 and LD25 determined from the cytotoxicity assay data, and incubated in a 5% CO2 at 37oC for 72 hrs. After incubation, the cells were centrifuged, washed with PBS, and re-suspended in 100 µL PBS. In a 2 mL tube, 20 µL of the cell suspension and 200 µL of melted agarose were mixed and 75µL pipetted onto a pre-warmed slide. The slides were placed in a refrigerator at 4° C for 10-20 min and placed in chilled lysis buffer for 45 min. Slides were washed twice for 5 min with TBE and electrophoresed in a horizontal gel apparatus at 25V for 10 min. Slides were placed in 70% ethanol for 10 min, removed, tapped to remove excess ethanol, and placed in an alkaline solution containing 99mL H2O, 100µL of 0.1mM Na2EDTA and 1g NaOH for 45 min. Slides were air dried for 2.5 hrs, stained with SYBR Green and allowed to set 4 hrs. The slides were viewed with an Olympus fluorescence microscope and analyzed using LAI’s Comet Assay Analysis System software (Loates Associates, Inc. Westminster, MD).

Statistical Analysis

Cell mortality data recorded from the cytotoxicity assay were plotted against arsenic trioxide concentrations and a linear regression analysis was performed to determine and characterize the dose-response relationship equation. This equation was then used to determine the LD10 and LD25 values used in subsequent genotoxicity experiments with the comet assay. For comet assay, photographs were taken to illustrate the changes in DNA morphology associated with arsenic exposure. The comet data for DNA fragmentation and tail length were expressed as means ± SDs with n = 70, and F-statistic ANOVA was applied to determine if there were significant differences in genotoxicity with regard to arsenic treatment and cell type. Differences were considered at p value ≤ 0.05.

Results

Cytotoxicity Assay

Cytotoxicity data in terms of LD10 and LD25 for acutely and chronically exposed cells are shown in Table 1. In acute experiments for cytoxicity, the LD10 for melanocytes was lower than that of keratinocytes and dendritic cells. LD25 dose for keratinocytes was the highest while that of dendritic cells was intermediate, andthat of melanocytes was the lowest. In chronic exposure for cytoxicity assay melanocytes and dendritic cells are more sensitive at LD10 than keratinocytes while melanocytes are more sensitive than keratinocytes and dendritic cells at LD25.
Table 1. Cytotoxicity (LD10 and LD25) of arsenic trioxide in acute and chronically-exposed skin cells.
Table 1. Cytotoxicity (LD10 and LD25) of arsenic trioxide in acute and chronically-exposed skin cells.
Cell typeExposure type LD10 (ppm)LD25 (ppm)
KeratinocytesAcute 0.383.00
Chronic0.400.80
MelanocytesAcute 0.190.38
Chronic0.100.25
Dendritic cellsAcute0.380.75
Chronic0.101.00

Comet Assay for Genotoxicity

The comet assay or single cell gel electrophoresis revealed that treatment of the cells with arsenic causes severe damage to the cells’ nuclear DNA. Figure 1 is the representative picture for all the three cell types. As shown in this figure, the nuclear DNA of untreated cells is perfectly round, but the nuclear DNA of arsenic treated cells is severely fragmented. There are several ways to measure the severity of DNA fragmentation. Here listed are the percent of DNA fragmentation (percent of DNA in the Comet tail versus total DNA), and the length of the comet tail. The higher the percent of DNA fragments, the more severe is the damage. Similarly, the longer the comet tail, the smaller is the DNA fragment, the more severe is the damage.
Figure 2 depicts the percentages of DNA fragmentation, and the lengths of comet tail in keratinocytes, melanocytes, and dendritic cells acutely (upper graphs), and chronically (lower graphs) exposed to arsenic trioxide at LD10 and LD25 doses. Damage to the nuclear DNA of melanocytes and dendritic cells as measured by both percent DNA damage and length comet tail of DNA fragments is similar for both LD10 and LD25, but significantly (p < 0.01) more severe than that of the keratinocytes (Figure 2).
Results showed when compared to controls that there was no significant difference in tail length of acutely exposed keratinocytes at LD10, however, there was statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) for the LD25 exposure. In chronically exposed keratinocytes, there were significant differences at all exposure levels (p < 0.001) for tail length. The percentage of DNA damage and the length of the comet tail were up in LD10 dose but did not reach statistical significance, while DNA damage and tail length were up and reached statistical significance in LD25 (p < 0.001) when compared to controls.
In the acutely exposed melanocytes, LD10 tail length increased slightly more than LD25 when compared to controls but neither reached statistical significance. In chronically exposed melanocytes, tail length for LD10 decreased slightly while LD25 increased significantly (p < 0.001) when compared to controls. The percentage of DNA damage in melanocytes with acute exposure was slightly increased at LD10 and more at LD25 when compared to controls but showed no statistical significant differences. Chronically exposed melanocytes showed %DNA damage to be significant at LD25 only.
At acute exposures dendritic cells showed tail length to be slightly greater at LD10 than LD25 when compared to controls, but the difference in lengths were statistically significant at both LD10 and LD25 (p < 0.001). In chronically exposed dendritic cells, tail length increased at LD10 and more at LD25 than the controls, and reached statistical significance (p < 0.001). DNA damages in dendritic cells acutely exposed at LD10 and LD25 were greater than controls but did not reach statistical significance. Damages in chronically exposed dendritic cells at both LD10 and LD25 were greater than the controls and were significantly different (p < 0.001) (Figure 2).

Discussion

Cytotoxicity Assay

Human exposure to arsenic, a ubiquitous and toxic environmental pollutant, is associated with an increased incidence of skin cancer. It is a carcinogen that poses a significant health risk in humans. The mechanisms associated with arsenic-mediated toxicity, DNA damage and proliferation at low chronic levels of exposure remain to be examined in depth. Cell cytotoxicity measures the capacity of the intact cell to recover from the damage induced and thus forms the basis for measuring the sensitivity of the cell in question. Several studies have addressed cytotoxicity to keratinocytes using different forms of arsenic [14,15,16] but not arsenic trioxide.
Fig. 1. Comet assay depicting the genotoxic effect of arsenic (LD10) to melanocytes, dendritic cells and keratinocytes acutely and chronically exposed. The bottom pictures are two control keratinocytes wile the upper figures represent keratinocytes, dendritic cells and melanocytes exposed to arsenic trioxide at the dose levels of LD10. Y-axis represents total height while X-axis gives total length of the comet
Fig. 1. Comet assay depicting the genotoxic effect of arsenic (LD10) to melanocytes, dendritic cells and keratinocytes acutely and chronically exposed. The bottom pictures are two control keratinocytes wile the upper figures represent keratinocytes, dendritic cells and melanocytes exposed to arsenic trioxide at the dose levels of LD10. Y-axis represents total height while X-axis gives total length of the comet
Ijerph 01 00083 g001
Fig. 2. Percentages of DNA fragmentation and lengths of comet tail in acutely and chronically exposed keratinocytes (K), melanocytes (M), and dendritic cells (D) at LD10 and LD25.
Fig. 2. Percentages of DNA fragmentation and lengths of comet tail in acutely and chronically exposed keratinocytes (K), melanocytes (M), and dendritic cells (D) at LD10 and LD25.
Ijerph 01 00083 g002
Arsenic toxicity studies on melanocytes and dendritic cells are also lacking in the literature. Our studies found the acute LD25 to be 3ppm for HaCaT and the chronic LD25 to be 0.8ppm. LD25 values of 0.38ppm and 0.25ppm in acute and chronic exposures were found for melanocytes, while values of 0.75ppm and 1.0ppm were recorded in dendritic cells, respectively (Table 1). These data indicate that arsenic is cytotoxic to the three tested skin cells, and that melanocytes appear to be more sensitive to arsenic toxicity while keratinocytes are more tolerant at both acute and chronic conditions. For the most part these data indicate that chronically-exposed cells are more sensitive to arsenic toxicity than in acute exposure with the exception of keratinocytes at LD10 and dendritic cells at LD25.

Comet Assay for Genotoxicity

Human activities have increased the possibility of exposure to naturally occurring metals causing a greater risk of exposure to toxic levels [17]. The exposure of metals such as arsenic constitutes a major health concern. Arsenite induces DNA damage referred to as genotoxicity in human cells within a pathologically meaningful dose range. Arsenic toxicity is cell specific; therefore, it is important that target cells be used for investigations [17]. Hamadeh et al. exposed normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEK) to nontoxic doses (0.005-5 µM) of arsenic (III) and that exposure simultaneously modulates DNA repair, and redox-related gene expression in NHEK [18]. Studies show that arsenic may not directly impact DNA but may inhibit some DNA repair [19]. Arsenic has been shown to induce DNA damage in human cells. Inorganic arsenic increases the frequency of micronuclei, chromosome aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges as well as inhibits DNA repair [10,11]. Specifically, a significant increase in comet tail-length at doses 0 to 6.45 mg/kg body weight demonstrated that arsenic trioxide cause DNA damage effectively [20,21]. Using the comet assay, we applied the alkaline treatment which aids in the unwinding and denaturation of DNA molecules, thus allowing for the sensitive detection of single-strand damage [22].
In our studies using the three cell lines, we found for genotoxicity assay that in acute exposures there was a decrease in DNA fragmentation and tail length for keratiinocytes at LD25. This implies that probably a DNA repair mechanism may be activated thus affording protection to keratinocytes. Further, the damage to the nuclear DNA in melanocytes and dendritic cells was more severe than that of keratinocytes. In general, the DNA damage to chronically exposed keratinocytes was lower than dendritic cells and melanocytes. It can thus be conjectured that genotoxicity or cancer in the long term effect could be attributed to dendritic cells and melanocytes. When comparing dendritic cells and melanocytes one can further speculate that dendritic cells are playing a more important role as the damage to the dendritic cells is more severe than melanocytes. Thus, we have demonstrated that dendritic cells are more potent in genotoxicity implying that they may be the first trigger followed by melanocytes and then eventually affecting the key element keratinocytes in skin carcinoma.
With respect to arsenic we propose that arsenic has a multifactorial effect on the cellular elements of the epidermis (Figure 3). According to our model it is postulated that the initial change caused by arsenic is on the dendritic cell at the DNA level. The antigen presenting cell then presents arsenic very effectively to the melanocyte which causes its cell death. If the death is partial then it triggers keratinocyte to alter its division and thus lead to carcinoma of the skin. If there is extensive death then the characteristic changes in the pigmentation of the skin occur.
Our cytotoxicity data revealed that keratinoctes were more tolerant while dendritic cells were intermediate and melanocytes were most sensitive to arsenic toxicity. Pigmentation alteration due to long-term exposure of arsenic could be associated due to the direct cytoxicity of arsenic on melanocytes. This research is the first report investigating the in vitro effects of arsenic-induced cytotoxicity and DNA damage in melanocytes, dendritic cells and keratinocytes, concomitantly in the same study. It is anticipated that data from this report will serve as a base for furthering our knowledge on arsenic modulation of cytotoxicity and DNA damage in skin cells.
Fig. 3. A schematic representation of the damage caused by arsenic on the cellular elements of the skin involving keratinocytes, melanocytes and dendritic cells.
Fig. 3. A schematic representation of the damage caused by arsenic on the cellular elements of the skin involving keratinocytes, melanocytes and dendritic cells.
Ijerph 01 00083 g003

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (Grant # 1G12RR13459) through the Center for Environmental Health, and in part by the U.S. Department of Education (Grant # PO31B990006) through the Title-III Graduate Education Program. The authors thank Jian Yan for the technical assistance.

References

  1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxfacts for arsenic; (Update); U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service: Atlanta, GA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tchounwou, P. B.; Centeno, J, A.; Patlolla, A. K. Arsenic toxicity, mutagenesis and carcinogenesis: a health risk assessment and management approach. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2004, 255, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ali, A.; Lock, J. Physiological and toxicological changes in the skin result from the action and interaction of metal ions. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 1995, 25, 397–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chiang, M. C.; Yih, L. H.; Haung, R. N.; Peck, K.; Lee, T. C. Tumor formation of immortalized HaCaT cells in nude mice by long term exposure to sodium arsenite at non toxic doses. Toxicol. 2001, 164, 95(P2A21). [Google Scholar]
  5. Tchou, I.; Sabido, O.; Lambert, C.; Misery, L.; Garraud, O.; Genin, C. Technique for obtaining highly enriched, quiescent immature Langerhans cells suitable for ex vivo assays. Immunol. Lett. 2003, 86((1)), 7–14. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, C-S. J.; Siegel, D. M. Arsenical Keratosis. eMedicine J. 2002, 2((6)). [Google Scholar]
  7. www.mgs.bionet.nsc.ru/mgs/gnw/trrd/theraurus/Sk/skin.html.
  8. Gradecka, D.; Palus, J.; Wasowicz, W. Selected mechanisms of genotoxic effects of inorganic arsenic compounds. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2001, 14((4)), 317–328. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hei, T. Free Radicals Mediate Arsenic’s Harmful Effects. 2002; Online at [email protected]. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gebel, T. W. Genotoxicity of arsenical compounds. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2001, 203((3)), 249–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Waclavicek, M.; Berer, A.; Oehler, L.; Stockl, J.; Schloegl, E.; Majdic, O.; Knapp, W. Calcium ionophore: a single reagent for the differentiation of primary human acute myelogenous leukaemia cells towards dendritic cells. Br J Haematol 2001, 114((2)), 466–73. [Google Scholar]
  12. Graham-Evans, B.; Tchounwou, Paul B.; Cohly, Hari H. P. Cytotoxicity and Proliferation Studies with Arsenic in Established Human Cell Lines: Keratinocytes, Melanocytes, Dendritic Cells, Dermal Fibroblasts, Microvascular Endothelial Cells, Monocytes and T-Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2003, 4, 13–21. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bae, D. S.; Gennings, C.; Carter, W. H., Jr.; Yang, R. S.; Campain, J. A. Toxicological interactions among arsenic, cadmium, chromium, and lead in human keratinocytes. Toxicol. Sci. 2001, 63, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bau, D. T.; Wang, T. S.; Chung, C. H.; Wang, A. S.; Wang, A. S.; Jan, K. Y. Oxidative DNA adducts and DNA-protein cross-links are the major DNA lesions induced by arsenite. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002, 110((5)), 753–756. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bernstam, L.; Lan, C. H.; Lee, J.; Nriagu, J. O. Effects of arsenic on human keratinocytes, morphological, physiological, and precursor incorporation studies. Environ. Res. 2002, 3, 220–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Latinwo, L.; Ikediobi, C.; Singh, N. P.; Sponholtz, G.; Fasanya, C.; Riley, L. Comparative studies of in vivo genotoxic effects of cadmium chloride in rat brain, kidney and liver cells. Cellular and Molecular Biology 1997, 43((2)), 203–210. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hamadeh, H. K.; Trouba, K. J.; Amin, R. P.; Afshari, C. A.; Germolec, D. Coordination of altered DNA repair and damage pathways in arsenite-exposed keratinocytes. Toxicol Sci 2002, 69((2)), 306–16. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen, G. Q.; Zhu, J.; Shi, X. G.; Ni, J. H.; Zhong, H. J.; Si, G. Y.; Jin, X. L.; Tang, W.; Li, X. S.; Xong, S. M.; Shen, Z. X.; Sun, G. L.; Ma, J.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, T. D.; Gazin, C.; Naoe, T.; Chen, S. J.; Wang, Z. Y.; Chen, Z. In vitro studies on cellular and molecular mechanisms of arsenic trioxide (As2O3) in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia: As2O3 induces NB4 cell apoptosis with down regulation of Bcl-2 expression and modulation of PML-RAR alpha/PML proteins. Blood 1996, 88, 1052–1061. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fischer, A. B.; Buchet, J. P.; Lauwerys, R. R. Arsenic uptake, cytotoxicity and detoxification studied in mammalian cells in culture. Arch. Toxicol. 1985, 57((3)), 168–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. National Academy Press. Arsenic in Drinking Water: 2001 Update, 2001; Online at: www.nap.edu.
  21. Saleha Banu, B.; Danadevi, K.; Jamil, K.; Ahuja, Y. R.; Visweswara; Rao, K.; Ishaq, M. In vivo genotoxic effect of arsenic trioxide in mice using comet assay. Toxicology 2001, 162((3)), 171–7. [Google Scholar]
  22. Nelms, E. Measuring Apoptosis in Individual Cells with the Comet Assay. Promega Notes. 1997, 64, 13. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Graham-Evans, B.; Cohly, H.H.P.; Yu, H.; Tchounwou, P.B. Arsenic-Induced Genotoxic and Cytotoxic Effects in Human Keratinocytes, Melanocytes and Dendritic Cells. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2004, 1, 83-89. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph2004020083

AMA Style

Graham-Evans B, Cohly HHP, Yu H, Tchounwou PB. Arsenic-Induced Genotoxic and Cytotoxic Effects in Human Keratinocytes, Melanocytes and Dendritic Cells. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2004; 1(2):83-89. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph2004020083

Chicago/Turabian Style

Graham-Evans, Barbara, Hari H. P. Cohly, Hongtao Yu, and Paul B. Tchounwou. 2004. "Arsenic-Induced Genotoxic and Cytotoxic Effects in Human Keratinocytes, Melanocytes and Dendritic Cells" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 1, no. 2: 83-89. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph2004020083

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop