Next Article in Journal
Microbiological Analysis in Three Diverse Natural Geothermal Bathing Pools in Iceland
Previous Article in Journal
Observational Studies and a Statistical Early Warning of Surface Ozone Pollution in Tangshan, the Largest Heavy Industry City of North China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

UVA Photoirradiation of Nitro-Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons—Induction of Reactive Oxygen Species and Formation of Lipid Peroxides

1
National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA
2
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD 20740, USA
3
Hung Kuang University, Sha-Lu, Taichung, 443, Taiwan
4
National Institute of Occupational Health and Poisoning Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China
5
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS 39217, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article is not an official guidance or policy statement of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). No official support or endorsement by the U.S. FDA is intended or should be inferred.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10(3), 1062-1084; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10031062
Submission received: 1 February 2013 / Revised: 6 March 2013 / Accepted: 6 March 2013 / Published: 14 March 2013

Abstract

:
Nitro-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (nitro-PAHs) are a class of genotoxic environmental contaminants. We have long been interested in determining the mechanisms by which nitro-PAHs induce genotoxicity. Although the metabolic activation of nitro-PAHs leading to toxicological activities has been well studied, the photo-induced activation of nitro-PAHs has seldom been reported. In this paper, we report photo-induced lipid peroxidation by 19 nitro-PAHs. The results indicated that all but two of the nitro-PAHs can induce lipid peroxidation. Mechanistic studies suggest that lipid peroxidation by nitro-PAHs is mediated by free radicals generated in the reaction. There was no structural correlation between the nitro-PAHs and their ability to induce lipid peroxidation upon UVA irradiation, or between the HOMO-LUMO gap and the ability to cause lipid peroxidation. Most of the nitro-PAHs are less potent in terms of causing lipid peroxidation than their parent PAHs. The lack of correlation is attributed to the complex photophysics and photochemistry of the nitro-PAHs and the yield of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and other factors.

1. Introduction

Since 1978, nitro-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (nitro-PAHs) have been identified as widespread genotoxic environmental contaminants from different environmental sources, including diesel emissions, combustion emissions from kerosene heaters, gas fuel, and liquefied petroleum, airborne particulates, coal fly ash, and food [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Nitro-PAHs require metabolic activation in order to exert their mutagenic and carcinogenic activities [7,8,9,10,11,12]. Because of their widespread presence in the environment and genotoxic activities, many of these compounds may pose a health risk to humans. The environmental occurrence and toxicological activities, including metabolism, mutagenicity, and carcinogenicity, of a large number of nitro-PAHs have been extensively studied [5,7,11].
We have long been interested in studying nitro-PAH induced mutagenesis and carcinogenesis on the basis of structure-activity relationship [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. To date, the study on nitro-PAH induced phototoxicity on the basis of structure-activity relationship has been limited [14,19,20]. There has no systematic report on the study of induction of lipid peroxidation by photoirradiation of nitro-PAHs on a basis of structure-activity relationships. This is because, in most cases, the structurally related nitro-PAHs are not available for study. In this paper we report: (i) novel synthesis of 1-nitrobenzo[a]pyrene (1-nitro-BaP), 3-nitro-BaP, 1-nitrobenzo[e]pyrene (1-nitro-BeP), and 3-nitro-BeP; (ii) UVA photoirradiation of nineteen representative nitro-PAHs and ten parent PAHs (Figure 1) in the presence of methyl linoleate, which resulted in lipid peroxide (methyl linoleate hydroperoxides) formation; and (iii) use of enzyme inhibition and electron spin resonance (ESR) spin trapping technique to determine the formation of free radicals, including reactive oxygen species. ESR spin trapping studies indicated that singlet oxygen, superoxide anion radicals, and nitro-PAH-derived free radicals were generated from UVA photoirradiation of nitro-PAHs in a light dose dependent manner. The formation of nitro-PAH-induced lipid peroxidation by UVA irradiation is also discussed on the basis of structure-activity relationships.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Instrumentation

Anthracene, phenanthrene, benz[a]anthracene (BA), chrysene, pyrene, fluoranthene, benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), benzo[e]pyrene (BeP), dibenz[a,h]anthracene (DB[a,h]A), dibenz[a,c]-anthracene (DB[a,c]A), 1-nitronaphthalene, 9-nitroanthracene, sodium borohydride, trifluoroacetic acid, p-toluenesulfonic acid (TsOH), sodium nitrate, anhydrous hydrazine, 2,3-dichloro-5,6-cyano-1,6-benzoquinone (DDQ), sodium azide (NaN3), dithiothreitol (DTT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), methyl linoleate, 5,5-dimethyloxide pyrroline (DMPO), and 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMP) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The nitrone spin trap, 5-tert-butoxycarbonyl-5-methyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (BMPO) was purchased from Applied Bioanalytical Labs (Sarasota, FL, USA). 2-Nitro-BaP was synthesized as previously described [21]. 1-Nitro-BaP, 3-nitro-BaP, 6-nitro-BaP, 1-nitro-BeP, and 3-nitro-BeP were prepared through new synthesis methods described below. All the other nitro-PAHs used in this study were prepared as described previously [18]. All the nitro-PAHs and PAHs were analyzed by HPLC and found to be >99% pure. Other chemicals and solvents were purchased from either Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) or Fisher Scientific (Houston, TX, USA).
A Waters HPLC system consisting of a Model 600 controller, a Model 996 photodiode array detector, and pump was used to determine the amount of methyl linoleate hydroperoxide formed. Conventional ESR spectra were obtained with a Varian E-109 X-band spectrometer and interfaced to a personal computer for data acquisition and manipulation. ESR signals were recorded with 15 mW incident microwave and 100 kHz field modulation of 1.25 G (for TEMP) and 1G (for DMPO-OOH). The scan ranges were 80 G (for TEMP) and 100 G (for DMPO-OOH), respectively. All measurements were performed at room temperature. For organic synthesis, all mass spectra analyses were performed on a JEOL JMS‑DX300 mass spectrometer with a solid probe by electron impact at 70 eV. UV-Vis absorption spectra were obtained using a Shimadzu UV-260 spectrophotometer, and samples were dissolved in methanol. Proton NMR spectra were measured in acetone‑d6 with a Bruker WM-500 spectrometer.

2.2. Synthesis of 1-, 3-, and 6-Nitrobenzo[a]pyrene (Scheme 1)

Nitration of 10-keto-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene [22] (950 mg, 3.52 mmol) in glacial acetic acid (150 mL) with equimolar sodium nitrate was carried out in trifluoroacetic acid (TFA, 25 mL) at ice-water temperature for 30 min, followed by silica gel column chromatography using 20% ethyl acetate in hexane to furnish pure 1-nitro-10-keto-7,8,9,10-tetrahydro-BaP (1), 3-nitro-10-keto-7,8,9,10-tetrahydro-BaP (2), and 6-nitro-10-keto-7,8,9,10-tetrahydro-BaP (3) in that order.
  • 1-Nitro-10-keto-7,8,9,10-tetrahydro-BaP (1): 26% yield, m.p. 237–238°; mass spectrum, m/z 315 (M+); UV-Vis spectrum, 389 (e = 1,300), 335 (4,000) and 320 nm (5,400);
  • 3-Nitro-10-keto-7,8,9,10‑tetrahydro-BaP (2): 23% yield, m.p. 250–251.5°; mass spectrum, m/z 315 (M+); UV-Vis spectrum, 384 (11,000), 290 (1,500) and 280 (1,500);
  • 6-Nitro-10-keto-7,8,9,10-tetrahydro-BaP (3): 45% yield, m.p. 212–213°; mass spectrum, m/z 315 (M+); UV-Vis spectrum, 396 (1,000), 377 (14,000), 366 (1,400), 209 (1,900), 233 (3,100) and 203 (2,400).
1-Nitro-10-keto-7,8,9,10-tetrahydro-BaP (1, 248 mg) in tetrahydrofuran (40 mL) was reduced with sodium borohydride (150 mg) in methanol (45 mL) at ambient temperature for 1 hr. The reaction product was poured into ice water and neutralized with hydrochloric acid, affording the alcohol 1-nitro-10-hydroxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydro-BaP (4) in 92% yield; mp 157–158°; mass spectrum, m/z 317 (M+); UV-Vis spectrum, 398 (44,500), 290 (15,300) and 239 (57,000). Dehydration of 1-nitro-10-hydroxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydro-BaP (4, 231 mg) in refluxing benzene catalyzed by p-toluenesulfonic acid gave 1-nitro-7,8-dihydro-BaP (5) in 96% yield; mp 179–180°; mass spectrum, m/z 299 (M+). Dehydrogenation of 1-nitro-7,8-dihydro-BaP (5, 100 mg) with an equal molar DDQ in refluxing benzene for 8 h gave 1-nitro-BaP in nearly quantitative yield; m.p. 250–251° (lit. [23] m.p. 250–250.5°); mass spectrum, m/z 297 (M+); NMR (acetone-d6) 7.94 (dd, 1, H8), 8.02 (dd, 1, H9), 8.19 (d, 1, H4), 8.36 (d, 1, H3), 8.39 (d, 1, H5), 8.49 (d, 1, H7), 8.77 (d, 1, H2), 8.94 (s, 1, H6), 9.12 (d, 1, H12), 9.32 (d, 1, H10) and 9.57 ppm (d, 1, H11); J2,3 = 8.3 Hz, J4,5 = 9.2 Hz, J7,8 = 8.1 Hz, J8,9 = 6.9 Hz, J9,10 = 8.6 Hz, and J11,12 = 9.6 Hz.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 1-, 3-, and 6-nitrobenzo[a]pyrene.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 1-, 3-, and 6-nitrobenzo[a]pyrene.
Ijerph 10 01062 g010
Similarly, 3-nitro-10-keto-7,8,9,10‑tetrahydro-BaP (2) was reduced to the corresponding alcohol 3-nitro-10-hydroxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydro-BaP (6) (98% yield, mp 246–247°), which upon acid-catalyzed dehydration afforded 3-nitro-7,8-dihydro-BaP (7) in 96% yield (mp 179–180°). Dehydrogenation of 3-nitro-7,8-dihydro-BaP (100 mg) with DDQ gave 3-nitro-BaP in a 99% yield; mp 211‑212° (lit. [23] mp 211–212°); mass spectrum, m/z 297 (M+); NMR (acetone-d6) 7.94 (dd, 1, H8), 8.01 (dd, 1, H9), 8.47 (d, 1, H5), 8.49 (d, 1, H7), 8.50 (d, 1, H1), 8.59 (d, 1, H12), 8.63 (d, 1, H2), 8.64 (d, 1, H4), 8.94 (s, 1, H6), 9.31 (d, 1, H10) and 9.47 ppm (d, 1, H11); J1,2 = 8.6 Hz, J4,5 = 9.5 Hz, J7,8 = 8.1 Hz, J8,9 = 6.8 Hz, J9,10 = 8.5 Hz, and J11,12 = 9.2 Hz. Starting with 6-nitro-10-keto-7,8,9,10-tetrahydro-BaP (3), 6-nitro-BaP was similarly obtained.

2.3. Synthesis of 1- and 3-Nitrobenzo[e]pyrene (Scheme 2)

9-Keto-1,2,3,6,7,8,9,10,11,12-decahydro-BeP was synthesized by succinylation of 1,2,3,6,7,8-hexahydropyrene, followed by Clemmenson reduction of the resulting keto-acid and acid-catalyzed ring cyclization. Reduction of 9-keto-1,2,3,6,7,8,9,10,11,12-decahydro-BeP with three molar equivalent of DDQ in benzene under reflux for 1 h formed 9-keto-9,10,11,12-tetrahydro-BeP (Scheme 2). Wolff-Kishner reduction of 9-keto-9,10,11,12-tetrahydro-BeP dissolved in n-butane with anhydrous hydrazine under reflux for 48 h afforded 9,10,11,12‑tetrahydro-BeP; mass spectrum, m/z 256 (M+); NMR (acetone-d6) 8.38 (d, 2, H1,8), 8.24 (d, 2, H3,6), 8.15 (d, 2, H4,5), 8.06 (d, 2, H2,7), 3.35 (m, 2, H9,12) and 2.11 ppm (m, 2, H10,11); J1,2 = J2,3 = J6,7 = J7,8 = 7.7 Hz.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 1- and 3-nitrobenzo[e]pyrene.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 1- and 3-nitrobenzo[e]pyrene.
Ijerph 10 01062 g011
Nitration of 9,10,11,12-tetrahydro-BeP (100 mg, 0.39 mmol) was carried out in glacial acetic acid (50 mL) at ice-water temperature under argon with NaNO2 (35 mg, 0.41 mmol) in trifluoroacetic acid (17 mL) for 6 h. Silica gel column chromatography using 33% benzene in hexane furnished 1-nitro-9,10,11,12-tetrahydro-BeP and 3-nitro-9,10,11,12-tetrahydro-BeP; 1-nitro-9,10,11,12-tetrahydro-BeP—mass spectrum, m/z 301 (M+); NMR (acetone-d6) 8.60 (dd, 1, H8), 8.44 (dd, 1, H6), 8.38 (d, 1, H3), 8.35 (d, 1, H4), 8.28 (d, 1, H2), 8.27 (d, 1, H5), 8.21 (d, 1, H7), 3.51 (m, 2, H9), 3.07 (m, 2, H12), 2.15 (m, 2, H10) and 1.88 ppm (m, 2, H11); J2,3 = 8.1 Hz, J4,5 = 8.8 Hz, J6,7 = 7.7 Hz, and J7,8 = 7.7Hz. 3-nitro-9,10,11,12-tetrahydro-BeP—mass spectrum, m/z 301 (M+); NMR (acetone-d6) 8.77 (d, 1, H4), 8.71 (d, 1, H2), 8.61 (dd, 1, H8), 8.51 (d, 1, H1), 8.47 (d, 1, H5), 8.44 (dd, 1, H6), 8.22 (d, 1, H7), 3.45 (d, 2, H9), 3.39 (dd, 2, H12), and 2.13 ppm (dd, 4, H10,11); J1,2 = 8.8 Hz, J4,5 = 9.4 Hz, J6,7 = 7.9 Hz, and J7,8 = 7.9 Hz.
Dehydrogenation of 1‑nitro‑9,10,11,12-tetrahydro‑BeP (100 mg) with DDQ gave 1-nitro-BeP in 96% yield; mass spectrum, m/z 297 (M+); NMR (acetone‑d6) 9.20 (dd, 1, H8), 9.10 (dd, 1, H9), 8.46 (d, 1, H3), 8.45 (dd, 1, H6), 8.36 (d, 1, H5), 8.33 (d, 1, H2), 8.28 (d, 1, H4), 8.25 (dd, 1, H12), 8.24 (dd, 1, H7), 7.90 (dd, 1, H10) and 7.74 ppm (dd, 1, H11); J2,3 = 8.3 Hz, J4,5 = 9.0 Hz, J6,7 = 7.7 Hz, J7,8 = 8.1 Hz, J9,10 = 8.3 Hz, J10,11 = 7.1 Hz, and J11,12 = 8.4 Hz. Dehydrogenation of 3-nitro-9,10,11,12-tetra-hydro-BeP (100 mg) with DDQ gave 3-nitro-BeP in 99% yield; mass spectrum, m/z 297 (M+); NMR (acetone‑d6) 9.26 (dd, 1, H8), 9.25 (d, 1, H1), 9.10 (dd, 1, H12), 9.09 (dd, 1, H9), 8.73 (d, 1, H2), 8.70 (d, 1, H4), 8.48 (d, 1, H5), 8.45 (dd, 1, H6), 8.26 (dd, 1, H7), 7.95 (dd, 1, H11) and 7.90 ppm (dd, 1, H10); J1,2 = 9.0 Hz, J4,5 = 9.5 Hz, J6,7 = 8.2 Hz, J7,8 = 7.3 Hz, J9,10 = 8.2 Hz, and J11,12 = 8.2 Hz.

2.4. Light Sources

The UVA light box was custom made using four UVA lamps (National Biologics, Twinsburg, OH, USA) [23]. Spectral irradiance of the light box was determined using an Optronics OL754 Spectroradiometer (Optronics Laboratories, Orlando, FL, USA), and the light dose was routinely measured using a Solar Light PMA-2110 UVA detector (Solar Light Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA). The maximum emission of the UVA light box was determined to be between 340–355 nm. The light intensities at wavelengths below 320 nm (UVB light) and above 400 nm (visible light) are approximately two orders of magnitude lower than the maximum in the 340 – 355 nm spectral regions [23].
The UVA-irradiation doses used for study were from 7 - 35 J/cm2, approximately 23 to 115 min exposure at the dose rate of 5 mW/cm2. Ten J/cm2 of UVA, equals to about 2 h exposure at the noon time of sunny days during the summer around the world, based upon observations of UVA intensity of 2.1 mW/cm2 in Okayama, Japan in September [24], 3.6 mW/cm2 in Jackson, MS, USA in August [25], 5.4 mW/cm2 in Paris, France in July [26], 6.6 mW/cm2 in Coimbatore, India in July [27].

2.5. Peroxidation of Methyl Linoleate by UVA Photoirradiation of Nitro-PAHs

Experiments were conducted using a solution of 100 mM methyl linoleate and 1.0 mM nitro-PAH in methanol. Samples were placed in a UV-transparent cuvette and irradiated with 0, 7, or 21 J/cm2 of UVA light. After irradiation, the methyl linoleate hydroperoxides were separated by HPLC using a Prodigy 5 µm ODS column (4.6 × 250 mm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) eluted isocratically with 10% water in methanol (v/v) at 1 mL/min. The levels of lipid peroxidation were determined by HPLC, and levels were quantified by monitoring the elution of HPLC peak areas at 235 nm [23,28] followed by conversion to the concentration based on the molar extinction coefficient (at 235 nm) reported before [29]. The 10 parent PAHs were also studied in parallel.

2.6. Peroxidation of Methyl Linoleate Initiated by Photoirradiation of Nitro-PAHs in the Presence of a Free Radical Scavenger or Enhancer

The experiments were carried out as described above, with the exception that parallel experiments were conducted with UVA irradiation at 0, 7, 21, or 35 J/cm2 of UVA light and in the presence NaN3 or SOD. The concentration of SOD was 200 U/mL and NaN3 was 20 mM. It has been established that the lifetime of singlet oxygen is longer in deuterated solvents, such as deuterated water or methanol, than in protic solvent [30]. The effect on the levels of lipid peroxide formation induced by UVA photoirradiation of nitro-PAHs in CH3OH and CH3OD was conducted similarly.

2.7. Detection of Reactive Oxygen Species and Free Radicals by Photoirradiation of Nitro-PAHs Using ESR with Spin Trapping

ESR with spin trapping was used to detect superoxide anion radicals (O2·) formed by photoirradiation of nitro-PAHs at fixed time points. Each nitro-PAH at 0.9 mM in 90% CH3CN was mixed with 25 mM BMPO [31,32] and transferred to a 50 µL quartz capillary tube. The capillary tube was placed into the microwave cavity of a Bruker EMX ESR Spectrometer (Billerica, MA, USA). Nitro-PAH (4-nitropyrene or 4-nitro-BaP) was irradiated at wavelength 420 nm in the microwave cavity using light emitted from a 500 W Xe Arc lamp directed through a McPherson monochromator, model DM200 (Chelmsford, MA, USA). ESR spectra were collected at irradiation times of 5, 12, 20, 30, and 40 min. All ESR measurements were carried out at ambient temperature (27 °C) using the following settings for detection of the spin adduct between BMPO and O2· (DMPO-OOH ): 20 mW microwave power, 100 G scan range and 1 G field modulation amplitude, and 100 kHz modulation frequency. The data were obtained with error of less than 10%. For detection of singlet oxygen, samples containing 0.9 mM nitro-PAH and 20 mM TEMP in 95% CH3CN were irradiated at 340 nm, and ESR spectra were recorded after 20, 30, and 40 min of irradiation, respectively. Control did not contain any nitro-PAH.

2.8. Quantum Chemical Calculation of LUMO/HOMO Energy Gap

Quantum chemical calculations were carried out using the Gaussian 09 program package [33]. The geometry optimization (with Tight and GDIIS being options of the optimizer) was conducted using DFT (B3LYP hybrid functional) method with the 6–31G (d) basis set. The solvent effects were considered using the polarized continuum model which is performed with self-consistent reaction field in Gaussian. Methanol was employed for simulating real experimental conditions. The energy gaps between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of ten nitro-PAHs were calculated.

3. Results

3.1. Synthesis of Nitro-BaPs and Nitro-BePs

Toxicological studies, including phototoxicity, require pure substrates for experiments. To our understanding, the synthesis of 1-, 3-, 6-nitro-BaP, 1- and 3-nitro-BeP, as shown in Scheme 1 and Scheme 2, represents the best approach so far reported. Our synthetic method provides all these compounds with high yield and purity, and the isomers are easily isolated by column chromatography. Purity and structural assignments were achieved by the usual array of analytical techniques such as 1H-NMR spectroscopic, mass spectroscopy, melting points, and UV-Vis. Among these nitro-PAHs, 1-nitro-BaP, 3-nitro-BaP, and 3-nitro-BeP have a parallel orientation for their nitro groups, while 6-nitro-BaP and 1-nitro-BeP place their nitro groups in a perpendicular orientation to the aromatic ring. It has been reported that the nitro orientation is a major factor for the toxicological activities of nitro-PAHs [14,18]. Thus, these isomeric nitro-PAHs with the same molecular weight but different geometric structures with nitro functional group at different locations and orientations are ideal models for studying structure-activity relationships of nitro-PAHs.

3.2. UVA Photoirradiation of Nitro-PAHs and Their Parent PAHs in the Presence of Methyl Linoleate

A total of 19 structurally related nitro-PAHs were selected for the study of photoirradiation with UVA in the presence of a lipid, methyl linoleate. These nitro-PAHs are derived from the parent PAHs including anthracene, phenanthrene, pyrene, benz[a]anthracene (BA), chrysene, fluoranthene, BaP, BeP, dibenz[a,h]anthracene (DB[a,h]A), and dibenz[a,c]anthracene (DB[a,c]A) (Figure 1). These selected nitro-PAHs possess different sizes, ranging from three to five fused benzene-rings, and exhibit various carcinogenic potency. For comparison, ten parent PAHs are also included for this study. Each compound received two light doses of 7 and 21 J/cm2. Under these experimental conditions, among the 19 nitro-PAHs tested, there are 17 nitro-PAHs that induced lipid peroxidation; 1-nitro-BeP and 3-nitro-BeP are the only nitro-PAHs that did not induce lipid peroxidation (Table 1). Upon UVA irradiation, with the exception of phenanthrene, all parent PAHs also induced lipid peroxidation (Table 1).
As summarized in Table 1, the resulting lipid peroxidation exhibited a light-dose response. In most cases, the parent PAHs, including pyrene (Figure 2), BaP (Figure 3), and BeP (Figure 4), induced lipid peroxidation higher than their corresponding nitro-PAHs. The levels of lipid peroxidation induced by the nitro-PAH isomers were also drastically different. As shown in Figure 2, the order of lipid peroxidation induced by pyrene and nitropyrenes is: pyrene ≥ 1-nitropyrene > 2-nitropyrene ≈ 4-nitro-pyrene > 1,6-dinitropyrene. In the BeP series, both 1-nitro-BeP and 3-nitro-BeP did not induce lipid peroxidation, and 4-nitro-BeP induced lipid peroxidation at a level lower than that from BeP (Figure 4). As to the BaP and nitro-BaP series, the results shown in Figure 3 indicate the level of induction in an order of BaP > 1-nitro-BaP ≈ 3-nitro-BaP ≈ 6-nitro-BaP > 2-nitro-BaP.
Figure 1. Structures, names, numberings, and abbreviations of nitro-PAHs used in this study.
Figure 1. Structures, names, numberings, and abbreviations of nitro-PAHs used in this study.
Ijerph 10 01062 g001
Table 1. Generation of methyl linoleate hydroperoxide by UVA irradiation of nitro-PAHs and PAHs in the presence of methyl linoleate (ML).
Table 1. Generation of methyl linoleate hydroperoxide by UVA irradiation of nitro-PAHs and PAHs in the presence of methyl linoleate (ML).
Number of ringsCompound NameMethyl linoleate hydroperoxide (peak area with a maximum at 235 nm) UVA 7 J/cm2 UVA 21 J/cm2
Negative Control (ML only)289 ± 34479 ± 30
3 ringsAnthracene1,690 ± 843,390 ± 125
9-Nitroanthracene1,557 ± 553,106 ± 50
Phenanthrene323 ± 52603 ± 78
9-Nitrophenanthrene799 ± 541,412 ± 52
4-ringsPyrene1,044 ± 812,601 ± 129
1-Nitropyrene1,612 ± 1582,256 ± 54
2-Nitropyene492 ± 161,400 ± 51
4-Nitropyene610 ± 191,438 ± 91
Chrysene1,082 ± 1922,002 ± 175
6-Nitrochrysene1,192 ± 692,144 ± 215
Benz[a]anthracene2,785 ± 1254,390 ± 273
7-Nitrobenz[ a]anthracene996 ± 392,096 ± 233
Fluoranthene1,413 ± 1473,522 ± 442
2-Nitrofluoranthene1,581 ± 1092,908 ± 249
3-Nitrofluoranthene924 ± 741,788 ± 187
5-ringsBenzo[a]pyrene2,972 ± 2576,153 ± 462
1-Nitrobenzo[ a]pyrene753 ± 882,319 ± 241
2-Nitrobenzo[ a]pyrene346 ± 8858 ± 78
3-Nitrobenzo[ a]pyrene1,205 ± 1982,937 ± 142
6-Nitrobenzo[ a]pyrene1,003 ± 1432,387 ± 136
Benzo[e]pyrene1,341 ± 1552,155 ± 169
1-Nitrobenzo[ e]pyrene171 ± 15163 ± 2
3-Nitrobenzo[ e]pyrene169 ± 6179 ± 13
4-Nitrobenzo[ e]pyrene724 ± 131,372 ± 85
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene1,446 ± 1072,835 ± 257
7-Nitrodibenz[ a,h]anthracene904 ± 222,365 ± 54
Dibenz[a,c]anthracene2,091 ± 1903,935 ± 315
9-Nitrodibenz[ a,c]anthracene1,025 ± 972,410 ± 174
Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3). Parent PAHs are in bold.
Figure 2. Lipid peroxidation induced by photoirradiation of pyrene, 1-nitropyrene, 2-nitropyrene, 4-nitropyrene, and 1,6-dinitropyrene in methanol in the presence of methyl linoleate (ML) with UVA light at a light dose of 7 and 21 J/cm2 respectively. The levels of peroxidation were measured by HPLC analysis monitoring the elution at 235 nm.
Figure 2. Lipid peroxidation induced by photoirradiation of pyrene, 1-nitropyrene, 2-nitropyrene, 4-nitropyrene, and 1,6-dinitropyrene in methanol in the presence of methyl linoleate (ML) with UVA light at a light dose of 7 and 21 J/cm2 respectively. The levels of peroxidation were measured by HPLC analysis monitoring the elution at 235 nm.
Ijerph 10 01062 g002
Figure 3. Lipid peroxidation induced by photoirradiation of BaP, 1-nitro-BaP, 2-nitro-BaP, 3-nitro-BaP, and 6-nitro-BaP in methanol in the presence of methyl linoleate (ML) with UVA light at a light dose of 7 and 21 J/cm2 respectively.
Figure 3. Lipid peroxidation induced by photoirradiation of BaP, 1-nitro-BaP, 2-nitro-BaP, 3-nitro-BaP, and 6-nitro-BaP in methanol in the presence of methyl linoleate (ML) with UVA light at a light dose of 7 and 21 J/cm2 respectively.
Ijerph 10 01062 g003
Figure 4. Lipid peroxidation induced by photoirradiation of BeP, 1-nitro-BeP, 3-nitro-BeP, and 4-nitro-BeP in methanol in the presence of methyl linoleate (ML) with UVA light at a light dose of 7 and 21 J/cm2 respectively.
Figure 4. Lipid peroxidation induced by photoirradiation of BeP, 1-nitro-BeP, 3-nitro-BeP, and 4-nitro-BeP in methanol in the presence of methyl linoleate (ML) with UVA light at a light dose of 7 and 21 J/cm2 respectively.
Ijerph 10 01062 g004

3.3. Mechanism of UVA Light-Induced Lipid Peroxidation by Nitro-PAHs

To determine the involvement of singlet oxygen in the peroxidation of methyl linoleate initiated by UVA irradiation of nitro-PAH, 3-nitro-BaP was selected for photoirradiation in the presence of a free radical scavenger or enhancer. For comparison, the parent PAH, BaP was tested in parallel. Sodium azide (NaN3) is a free radical scavenger and can effectively react with singlet oxygen (1O2) and hydroxyl radical [34,35]. Thus, for mechanistic studies, the use of NaN3 alone cannot determine whether singlet oxygen is involved in lipid peroxidation. Since singlet oxygen has a longer half-life in deuterated methanol (CH3OD) than in methanol [30,34], study of the effect by NaN3 and CH3OD provides a reliable approach for determining whether singlet oxygen is involved in peroxidation [34].
Lipid peroxidation induced by photoirradiation of 3-nitro-BaP with UVA at a dose of 35 J/cm2 was inhibited 88% by NaN3 (p < 0.05) (Figure 5(A)). Lipid peroxidation increased 87% when CH3OH was replaced by CH3OD (p < 0.05) (Figure 5(A)). These results suggest that peroxidation of methyl linoleate initiated by photoirradiation of 3-nitro-BaP is mediated in part, if not all, by singlet oxygen. Similar results were obtained from BaP, which indicate that singlet oxygen is also involved in lipid peroxidation induced from UVA irradiation (Figure 5(B)).
Figure 5. Effects of NaN3 and CH3OD on peroxidation of methyl linoleate (ML) initiated by (A) 3-nitro-BaP, and (B) BaP in CH3OH under UVA irradiation.
Figure 5. Effects of NaN3 and CH3OD on peroxidation of methyl linoleate (ML) initiated by (A) 3-nitro-BaP, and (B) BaP in CH3OH under UVA irradiation.
Ijerph 10 01062 g005

3.4. Detection of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and Free Radicals Using ESR

ERS spin trapping was used to study the formation of ROS and free radicals by UVA irradiation of nitro-PAHs. The commonly used spin trap 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMP) was used to confirm singlet oxygen formation. It is well established that upon reaction of singlet oxygen with TEMP, the resulting 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO) is a stable nitroxide, with a sufficiently long half-life to be detected by ESR spectroscopy [36,37]. In the first study, the sample containing 0.9 mM 4-nitropyrene (Figure 6) and 20 mM TEMP in 95% CH3CN was irradiated at 420 nm, and ESR signal recorded after 1, 5, and 10 min exposure. UVA light irradiation of TEMP alone did not result in an ESR signal (Figure 6 control). With concomitant exposure of both TEMP and 4-nitropyrene to UVA light for 1 min, singlet oxygen was generated, as evidenced by an ESR spectral profile that is typical of TEMPO (Figure 6) [31,34,35]. The intensity of ESR signals progressively enhanced when photoirradiation time increased to 5 and 10 min, respectively (Figure 6). These results suggest that photoirradiation of 4-nitropyrene with UVA light generates singlet oxygen in a light dose dependent manner. Similar results were obtained from the study of 6-BeP (data not shown).
Figure 6. Generation of singlet oxygen from 4-nitropyrene. The sample containing 0.9 mM 4-nitropyrene and 20 mM 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine in 95% CH3CN was irradiated at 420 nm, and ESR signal recorded after 1, 5, and 10 min exposure. Control did not contain any 4-nitropyrene. ESR instrument settings were as follows: 20 mW microwave power, 100 G sweep width, 1 G field modulation amplitude, and 100 kHz modulation frequency.
Figure 6. Generation of singlet oxygen from 4-nitropyrene. The sample containing 0.9 mM 4-nitropyrene and 20 mM 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine in 95% CH3CN was irradiated at 420 nm, and ESR signal recorded after 1, 5, and 10 min exposure. Control did not contain any 4-nitropyrene. ESR instrument settings were as follows: 20 mW microwave power, 100 G sweep width, 1 G field modulation amplitude, and 100 kHz modulation frequency.
Ijerph 10 01062 g006
UVA irradiation of 4-nitropyrene and 4-nitro-BeP in the presence of methyl linoleate was also conducted with NaN3 or CH3OD. The results suggest that singlet oxygen is generated from UVA irradiation (data not shown).
To determine whether UVA irradiation of nitro-PAHs generates superoxide radical anion, 5-tert-butoxycarbonyl-5-methyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (BMPO), a trapping agent that efficiently traps superoxide radical anion [31], was concomitantly irradiated with 4-nitropyrene or 4-nitro-BeP. UVA photoirradiation of BMPO with UVA light alone did not result in an ESR signal (data not shown). In addition, no ESR signal was observed when a solution of 4-nitropyrene or 4-nitro-BeP was mixed with BMPO in the absence of UVA light (data not shown). However, an ESR signal was observed after photoirradiation of 4-nitropyrene and BMPO with UVA light for 5 min (Figure 7A insert). The ESR spectral profile is identical to that produced from the reaction of xanthine with xanthine oxidase in the presence of BMPO [31,35], indicating that BMPO-OH adducts were formed and detected by ESR spin trapping methods. The intensity of these ESR signals progressively enhanced when photoirradiation time increased to 12, 20, 30, and 40 min, respectively (Figure 7). When superoxide dismutase (SOD), a superoxide radical scavenger, was added to a mixture containing 4-nitropyrene and BMPO, photoirradiation with UVA light for a period of 8 min produced no ESR signal (data not shown). These overall results suggest that UVA irradiation of 4-nitropyrene generates superoxide anion and that its quantity formed is dependent on the light dose.
Figure 7. The generation of superoxide from (A) 4-nitropyrene and (B) 4-nitro-BeP. Samples contained 0.9 mM 4-nitropyrene or 4-nitro-BeP and 25 mM 5-tert-butoxycarbonyl-5-methyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (BMPO) in 90% CH3CN. Samples were irradiated at 420 nm, and ESR signal recorded after different time intervals. ESR instrument settings were as follows: 20 mW microwave power, 100 G sweep width, 1 G field modulation amplitude, and 100 kHz modulation frequency. The insert is the continuous wave ESR spectrum of BMPO-OH.
Figure 7. The generation of superoxide from (A) 4-nitropyrene and (B) 4-nitro-BeP. Samples contained 0.9 mM 4-nitropyrene or 4-nitro-BeP and 25 mM 5-tert-butoxycarbonyl-5-methyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (BMPO) in 90% CH3CN. Samples were irradiated at 420 nm, and ESR signal recorded after different time intervals. ESR instrument settings were as follows: 20 mW microwave power, 100 G sweep width, 1 G field modulation amplitude, and 100 kHz modulation frequency. The insert is the continuous wave ESR spectrum of BMPO-OH.
Ijerph 10 01062 g007
Similar results were also obtained from UVA irradiation of 4-nitro-BeP under similar conditions (Figure 7(B)), which suggest that superoxide radical anion was generated from photoirradiation of 4-nitro-BeP with UVA light.
ESR spectra were also collected to characterize radicals formed during UVA irradiation of 3-nitro-BaP and 6-nitro-BaP in the presence of 5,5-dimethyloxide pyrroline (DMPO). Upon reaction of DMPO with superoxide radical anion, the resulting DMPO-OOH adducts are unstable and easily decomposed to the corresponding hydroxyl DMPO-OH adducts [38]. As such, DMPO can be used to determine whether superoxide radical anion or hydroxyl radical generated. However, based on the ESR profiles, UVA irradiation of 3-nitro-BaP or 6-nitro-BaP in the presence of DMPO did not generate ESR signals of superoxide radical anion or hydroxyl radical (Figure 8). These results indicate that superoxide radical anion was not generated from photoirradiation of 3-nitro-BaP or 6-nitro-BaP with UVA light; while carbon-centered derived free radicals and/or PAH-oxy radicals were generated.
Figure 8. The generation of substrate-derived free radicals from (A) 3-nitro-BaP and (B) 6-nitro-BaP. Samples contained 0.9 mM 3-nitro-BaP or 6-nitro-BaP and 25 mM 5-tert-butoxycarbonyl-5-methyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (BMPO) in 90% CH3CN. Samples were irradiated at 382 and 400 nm for 3-nitro-BaP; and 369 and 389 nm for 6-nitro-BaP. ESR signal recorded after 5 and 25 min time intervals. ESR instrument settings were as follows: 20 mW microwave power, 100 G sweep width, 1 G field modulation amplitude, and 100 kHz modulation frequency.
Figure 8. The generation of substrate-derived free radicals from (A) 3-nitro-BaP and (B) 6-nitro-BaP. Samples contained 0.9 mM 3-nitro-BaP or 6-nitro-BaP and 25 mM 5-tert-butoxycarbonyl-5-methyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (BMPO) in 90% CH3CN. Samples were irradiated at 382 and 400 nm for 3-nitro-BaP; and 369 and 389 nm for 6-nitro-BaP. ESR signal recorded after 5 and 25 min time intervals. ESR instrument settings were as follows: 20 mW microwave power, 100 G sweep width, 1 G field modulation amplitude, and 100 kHz modulation frequency.
Ijerph 10 01062 g008

3.5. Computational Calculation of HOMO and LUMO Gaps

HOMO/LUMO gap is an important descriptor for the excited state property of organic molecules and usually directly affects their excited state reactions. Theoretical calculations of HOMO/LUMO energy gap of geometric isomers of nitro-BaPs, nitro-BePs and nitro-pyrenes were performed and compared with their corresponding photoinduced lipid peroxidation values. The calculation results are listed in Table 2. The results indicate that there is no correlation between the HOMO/LUMO energy gap and the level of the corresponding photoinduced lipid peroxidation.
Table 2. Quantum computation results of HOMO/LUMO energy gap of nitro-PAHs.
Table 2. Quantum computation results of HOMO/LUMO energy gap of nitro-PAHs.
CompoundsHOMO (eV)LUMO (eV)HOMO/LUMO Energy gap (eV)ML hydroperoxides (mM) at 7 J/cm2
BaP series
1-Nitro-BaP−5.6129−2.85892.754753 ± 88
2-Nitro-BaP−5.5044−2.64522.8592346 ± 8
3-Nitro-BaP−5.6004−2.84692.75351,205 ± 198
6-Nitro-BaP−5.6252−2.65532.96991,003 ± 143
BeP series
1-Nitro-BeP−5.8815−2.61043.2711171 ±15
3-Nitro-BeP−5.9286−2.78673.1419169 ± 6
4-Nitro-BeP−5.9106−2.75793.1527724 ± 13
Pyrene series
1-Nitropyrene−5.8957−2.80853.08721,612 ± 158
2-Nitropyrene−5.7732−2.60933.1339492 ± 16
4-Nitropyrene−5.8189−2.76773.0512610 ± 19

4. Discussion

In the paper, nitro-PAH-induced phototoxicity leading to lipid peroxidation was studied on the basis of structure-activity relationships. We first synthesized the isomeric 1-nitro-BaP, 3-nitro-BaP, 6-nitro-BaP, 1-nitro-BeP, and 3-nitro-BeP by novel approaches that are simple and convenient, providing all the compounds without contamination by their geometric isomers (Scheme 1 and Scheme 2). Subsequently, UVA photoirradiation of 19 environmental nitro-PAHs and their 10 parent PAHs in the presence of a lipid (methyl linoleate) was studied. The selected nitro-PAHs ranged from three to five aromatic rings. Seventeen of the nitro-PAHs exposed to UVA light induce lipid peroxidation in a light dose response manner (Table 1). In this study, the mechanisms of inducing lipid peroxidation were determined by using free radical scavengers or enhancers and by ESR spin trapping methodology. We found that the formation of lipid peroxidation was mediated by reactive intermediates including ROS (singlet oxygen and superoxide) and free radicals generated during UVA irradiation. It is noteworthy that although superoxide anion radicals were detected by the ESR-spin trapping approach, it was not detected by the enzyme inhibition reaction. Therefore, if superoxide is formed, it should be a very minor pathway.
For comparison, ten parent PAHs were also studied in parallel; a comparison indicated that the presence of a nitro group in the PAH molecule mostly decreases the level of lipid peroxidation, only 9-nitrophenanthrene caused more lipid peroxidation than phenanthrene. Three other nitro-PAHs, 1-nitropyrene, 6-nitrochrysene, and 2-nitrofluoranthene caused about the same amount of lipid peroxidation as their parent PAHs. We also determined that the level of lipid peroxidation formation was independent of the geometrical location and orientation of the nitro group, or the size of the PAH moiety in geenral. This is drastically different from the structure-activity study of mutagenicity and tumorigenicity of nitro-PAHs from which good correlations were observed [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. For example, when assayed in Salmonella typhimurium tester strain TA98 in the absence of an exogenous S9 activation enzymes, nitro‑PAHs with the nitro substituent situated at the longest molecular axis, such as 2-nitro-BaP, exhibited the highest mutagenicity among the geometrical nitro-PAH isomers [17]. However, the induction of photo-induced lipid peroxidation by 2-nitro-BaP was lower than 1-, 3-, and 6-nitro-BaP (Figure 4). The relative levels of UVA-induced lipid peroxidation by the nitro-PAHs (Table 2) did not correlate with the relative carcinogenic activity or the tumor-initiation activity reported in the literature [11]. The lack of correlation is understandable since the mechanism leading to lipid peroxidation and the mechanisms involving enzymatic metabolic activation leading to tumorigenicity are different.
The LUMO/HOMO energy gap of the isomeric nitro-BaPs, nitro-BePs, and nitropyrenes was calculated, and there was no correlation with the level of induced lipid peroxidation (Table 2), although we previously found that HOMO/LUMO can be used to correlate with UVA-induced DNA cleavage by the twelve isomeric methylbenz[a]anthracenes [39]. The lack of correlation may be due to the fact that induction of lipid peroxidation is mediated by ROS, rather than through only simple photo-excitation from ground to excited state. Lipid peroxidation is probably directly related to singlet oxygen and superoxide quantum yield and life time as a result of the irradiation and the solvent environment, but these quantum yields and life times may not directly relate to the HOMO-LUMO gaps. Once a nitro-PAH is in the excited singlet state, its intersystem crossing rate versus the fluorescence and other non-radiative decay rates will determine the triplet state concentration, which, due to its longer lifetime, is the source for singlet oxygen and superoxide. Also, the excited state nitro-PAH, singlet or triplet, may undergo reactions with other molecules than oxygen. Therefore, our theoretical calculations on HOMO-LUMO gap provide the evidence that HOMO-LUMO gap is not a decisive factor in the formation of photo-induced lipid peroxidation by nitro-PAHs. Recently, there have been several reports on the photophysics of nitro-PAHs [40,41,42,43]. An ultrafast intercrossing was observed from the excited singlet state to the excited triplet state. It was concluded that the presence of the nitro-group greatly enhances the intersystem crossing rate in comparison to the parent PAHs. The triplet state nitro-PAHs can react in many ways: (i) lose energy to go back to the ground state, (ii) formation of phenoxy radicals and NO, which either recombine or form nitroso-substituted products or the phenoxy radical reacts with another molecule to extract a hydrogen to form phenolic compounds, (iii) react with ground state oxygen to form ROS. Both reactions (i) and (iii) may produce species leading to lipid peroxidation. We previously studied the photolysis of 9-methyl-10-nitroanthracene and 12-methyl-7-nitrobenz[a]anthracene [44]. Both nitro-PAHs have nitro functional groups with an orientation perpendicular to the aromatic moiety. Similar to the finding previously reported by Chapman et al. [45], we found that the excited state rearrangement reaction, which involves the rearrangement of the nitro group to a nitrite, followed by breaking of the N-O bond producing NO radical. The NO radical further forms a bond with the carbon on the opposite site of the benzene ring through radical recombination.
The complex photo-induced reactions of nitro-PAHs can be further illustrated by photoirradiation of 2- and 9-nitroanthracene as examples (Figure 9). 2-Nitroanthracene and 9-nitroanthracene are arbitrarily selected to represent nitro-PAHs with their nitro group adopting an orientation perpendicular or parallel to the aromatic moiety. As shown in Figure 9, the postulated free radicals formed at least include ROS (singlet oxygen and superoxide), PAH-oxy radicals, nitro-PAH-oxy radicals, and nitro-PAH carbon-centered radicals. This can be supported by our present study that not only singlet oxygen (Figure 5 and Figure 6) and superoxide (Figure 7) are generated, but possibly oxy radicals and/or carbon-centered radicals as well (Figure 8).
Figure 9. Using 2- and 9-nitroanthracenes as examples to show the proposed mechanism of inducing singlet oxygen, superoxide anion radicals, and carbon-centered free radicals by UVA irradiation of nitro-PAHs.
Figure 9. Using 2- and 9-nitroanthracenes as examples to show the proposed mechanism of inducing singlet oxygen, superoxide anion radicals, and carbon-centered free radicals by UVA irradiation of nitro-PAHs.
Ijerph 10 01062 g009
Nitro-PAHs are environmental contaminants and concomitantly exposed to sunlight. It is significant to find out whether or not nitro-PAHs are phototoxic. Since lipid peroxidation in humans has been associated with many diseases including cancer, athereosclerosis, ischemia, inflammation, liver injury, aging, etc., it is significant to determine whether photoirradiation of nitro-PAHs with UVA light (sunlight) can initiate lipid peroxidation, and the cause of its formation. It has long been known that lipid peroxidation can lead to induction of tumors in experimental animals [46,47]. ROS can also damage DNA and proteins leading to aging, inflammation, cardiovascular diseases, cancer and other age-related diseases [48,49,50,51]. On the basis of our present results, people exposed to the nitro-PAHs containing environmental pollutants on the skin with concomitant exposure to sunlight may result in deleterious effects if the level of the nitro-PAHs is high and if sunlight exposure is long. To assess human health risks posed by environmental phototoxic nitro-PAHs, more investigations on animals and ultimately on humans are warranted.

Acknowledgments

We thank Frederick A. Beland for critical review of this manuscript. The preliminary data of this study have been presented at the Second International Symposium on Recent Advances in Environmental Health Research, Jackson, Mississippi, 2005.

References

  1. Pitts, J.N., Jr.; Van Cauwenberghe, K.A.; Grosjean, D.; Schmid, J.P.; Fitz, D.R.; Belser, W.L.; Knudson, G.P.; Hynds, P.M. Atmospheric reactions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Facile formation of mutagenic nitro derivatives. Science 1978, 202, 515–519. [Google Scholar]
  2. Arey, J. Atmospheric Reactions of PAHs Including Formation of Nitroarenes. In The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry; Neilson, A.H., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin: Germany, 1998; Volume 3, pp. 347–385, Part I. [Google Scholar]
  3. Arey, J.; Zielinska, B.; Atkinson, R.; Winer, A.M.; Ramdahl, T.; Pitts, J.N., Jr. The formation of nitro-PAH from the gas-phase reactions of fluoranthene and pyrene with the OH radical in the presence of NOx. Atmos. Environ. 1986, 20, 2339–2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. IARC Diesel and Gasoline Engine Exhausts and Some Nitroarenes: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 1989; p. 359.
  5. WHO Environmental Health Criteria for Selected Nitro- and Nitro-Oxy-Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. In Environmental Health Criteria 229; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003.
  6. Fu, P.P.; Herreno-Saenz, D. Nitro-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: A class of genotoxic environmental pollutants. J. Environ. Sci. Health C Environ. Carcinog. Ecotoxicol. Rev. 1999, 17, 1–43. [Google Scholar]
  7. Beland, F.A.; Marques, M.M. DNA Adducts of Nitropolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. In DNA Adducts: Identification and Biological Significance; Hemmininki, K., Dipple, A., Shuker, D.E.G., Kadlubar, F.F., Segerbäck D. Bartsch, H., Eds.; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 1994; pp. 229–244. [Google Scholar]
  8. Delclos, K.B.; el-Bayoumy, K.; Hecht, S.S.; Walker, R.P.; Kadlubar, F.F. Metabolism of the carcinogen [3H]6-nitrochrysene in the preweanling mouse: Identification of 6-aminochrysene-1,2-dihydrodiol as the probable proximate carcinogenic metabolite. Carcinogenesis 1988, 9, 1875–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. el-Bayoumy, K.; Rivenson, A.; Johnson, B.; DiBello, J.; Little, P.; Hecht, S.S. Comparative tumorigenicity of 1-nitropyrene, 1-nitrosopyrene, and 1-aminopyrene administered by gavage to Sprague-Dawley rats. Cancer. Res. 1988, 48, 4256–4260. [Google Scholar]
  10. Upadhyaya, P.; Roy, A.K.; Fu, P.P.; el-Bayoumy, K. Metabolism and DNA binding of 2-nitropyrene in the rat. Cancer Res. 1992, 52, 1176–1181. [Google Scholar]
  11. Fu, P.P. Metabolism of nitro-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Drug. Metab. Rev. 1990, 22, 209–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fu, P.P.; Chou, M.W.; Miller, D.W.; White, G.L.; Helflich, R.H.; Beland, F.A. The orientation of the nitro substituent predicts the direct-acting bacterial mutagenicity of nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Mutat. Res. 1985, 143, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fu, P.P.; Heflich, R.H.; Von Tungeln, L.S.; Yang, D.T.; Fifer, E.K.; Beland, F.A. Effect of the nitro group conformation on the rat liver microsomal metabolism and bacterial mutagenicity of 2- and 9-nitroanthracene. Carcinogenesis 1986, 7, 1819–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fu, P.P.; Chou, M.W.; Beland, F.A. Effects of Nitro Substitution on the in vitro Metabolic Activation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. In Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Carcinogenesis: Structure-Activity Relationships; Yang, S.K., Silverman, B.D., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1988; pp. 37–65. [Google Scholar]
  15. Fu, P.P.; Heflich, R.H.; Unruh, L.E.; Shaikh, A.U.; Wu, Y.S.; Lai, C.C.; Lai, S. Relationships among direct-acting mutagenicity, nitro group orientation and polarographic reduction potential of 6-nitrobenzo[a]pyrene, 7-nitrobenz[a] anthracene and their derivatives. Mutat. Res. 1988, 209, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fu, P.P.; Ni, Y.C.; Zhang, Y.M.; Heflich, R.H.; Wang, Y.K.; Lai, J.S. Effect of the orientation of nitro substituent on the bacterial mutagenicity of dinitrobenzo[e] pyrenes. Mutat. Res. 1989, 225, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yu, S.; Herreno-Saenz, D.; Miller, D.W.; Kadlubar, F.F.; Fu, P.P. Mutagenicity of nitro-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with the nitro substituent situated at the longest molecular axis. Mutat. Res. 1992, 283, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jung, H.; Shaikh, A.U.; Heflich, R.H.; Fu, P.P. Nitro group orientation, reduction potential, and direct-acting mutagenicity of nitro-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 1991, 17, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. White, G.L.; Fu, P.P.; Heflich, R.H. Effect of nitro substitution on the light-mediated mutagenicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Salmonella typhimurium TA98. Mutat. Res. 1985, 144, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yu, H. Environmental carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Photochemistry and phototoxicity. J. Environ. Sci. Health C Environ. Carcinog. Ecotoxicol. Rev. 2002, 20, 149–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Miller, D.W.; Herreno-Saenz, D.; Huang, K.H.; Heinze, T.M.; Fu, P.P. Synthesis of nitropolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with the substituent at the longest axis. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 3746–3748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fu, P.P.; Clark, J.D.; Huang, A.Y. Synthesis of l0-oxo-7,8,9,l0-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene. J. Chem. Res. 1982, 5, 121. [Google Scholar]
  23. Cherng, S.-H.; Xia, Q.; Blankenship, L.R.; Freeman, J.P.; Wamer, W.G.; Howard, P.C.; Fu, P.P. Photodecomposition of retinyl palmitate in ethanol by UVA light-formation of photodecomposition products, reactive oxygen species, and lipid peroxides. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2005, 18, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Arimoto-Kobayashi, S.; Anma, N.; Yoshinaga, Y.; Douki, T.; Cadet, J.; Hayatsu, H. Oxidative damage and induced mutations in M13mp2 phage DNA exposed to N-nitrosopyrrolidine with UVA radiation. Mutagenesis 2000, 15, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yu, H.B.; Jin, W.; Ho, H.L.; Chan, K.C.; Chan, C.C.; Demokan, M.S.; Stewart, G.; Culshaw, B.; Liao, Y.B. Multiplexing of optical fiber gas sensors with a frequency-modulated continuous-wave technique. Appl. Opt. 2001, 40, 1011–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jeanmougin, M.; Civatte, J. Dosimetry of solar ultraviolet radiation. Daily and monthly changes in Paris. Ann. Dermatol. Venereol. 1987, 114, 671–676. [Google Scholar]
  27. Balasaraswathy, P.; Kumar, U.; Srinivas, C.R.; Nair, S. UVA and UVB in sunlight, optimal utilization of UV rays in sunlight for phototherapy. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 2002, 68, 198–201. [Google Scholar]
  28. Tokita, M.; Morita, M. Identification of new geometric isomers of methyl linoleate hydroperoxide and their chromatographic behavior. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2000, 64, 1044–1046. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gibian, M.J.; Vandenberg, P. Product yield in oxygenation of linoleate by soybean lipoxygenase: The value of the molar extinction coefficient in the spectrophotometric assay. Anal. Biochem. 1987, 163, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ogilby, P.R.; Foote, C.S. Chemistry of singlet oxygen. 42. Effect of solvent, solvent isotopic substitution, and temperature on the lifetime of singlet molecular oxygen (1.DELTA.g). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 3423–3430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yin, J.J.; Fu, P.P. Application of Electron Spin Resonance to Study Food Antioxidative and Prooxidative Activities. In Magnetic Resonance in Food Science, Challenges in a Changing World; Gudjonsdottir, M., Belton, P., Webb, G., Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2009; pp. 213–221. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhao, H.; Joseph, J.; Zhang, H.; Karoui, H.; Kalyanaraman, B. Synthesis and biochemical applications of a solid cyclic nitrone spin trap: A relatively superior trap for detecting superoxide anions and glutathiyl radicals. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2001, 31, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G.A.; et al. Gaussian 09 Package; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  34. Chiang, H.-M.; Yin, J.J.; Xia, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Fu, P.P.; Wen, K.C.; Yu, H. Photoirradiation of azulene and guaiazulene—Formation of reactive oxygen species and induction of lipid peroxidation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2010, 211, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xia, Q.; Yin, J.J.; Cherng, S.-H.; Wamer, W.G.; Boudreau, M.; Howard, P.C.; Fu, P.P. UVA photoirradiation of retinyl palmitate—Formation of singlet oxygen and superoxide, and their role in induction of lipid peroxidation. Toxicol. Lett. 2006, 163, 30–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lion, Y.; Gandin, E.; Van de Vorst, A. On the production of nitroxide radicals by singlet oxygen reaction: An EPR study. Photochem. Photobiol. 1980, 31, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rinalducci, S.; Pedersen, J.Z.; Zolla, L. Formation of radicals from singlet oxygen produced during photoinhibition of isolated light-harvesting proteins of photosystem II. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1608, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Noda, Y.; Kohno, M.; Mori, A.; Packer, L. Automated electron spin resonance free radical detector assays for antioxidant activity in natural extracts. Methods Enzymol. 1999, 299, 28–34. [Google Scholar]
  39. Dong, S.; Fu, P.P.; Shirsat, R.N.; Hwang, H.M.; Leszczynski, J.; Yu, H. UVA light-induced DNA cleavage by isomeric methylbenz[a]anthracenes. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2002, 15, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Arce, R.; Pino, E.F.; Valle, C.; Negron-Encarnacion, I.; Morel, M. A comparative photophysical and photochemical study of nitropyrene isomers occurring in the environment. J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 115, 152–160. [Google Scholar]
  41. Crespo-Hernandez, C.E.; Burdzinski, G.; Arce, R. Environmental photochemistry of nitro-PAHs: Direct observation of ultrafast intersystem crossing in 1-nitropyrene. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 6313–6319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Morales-Cueto, R.; Esquivelzeta-Rabell, M.; Saucedo-Zugazagoitia, J.; Peon, J. Singlet excited-state dynamics of nitropolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Direct measurements by femtosecond fluorescence up-conversion. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 552–557. [Google Scholar]
  43. Reichardt, C.; Vogt, R.A.; Crespo-Hernandez, C.E. On the origin of ultrafast nonradiative transitions in nitro-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Excited-state dynamics in 1-nitronaphthalene. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 224518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Stewart, G.; Jiao, Y.; Valente, E.J.; Fu, P.P.; Li, T.; Hu, Z.; Yu, H. Photochemical reaction of 9-nitro-substituted anthracene-like molecules 9-methyl-10-nitroanthracene and 12-methyl-7-nitrobenz[a]anthracene. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2009, 201, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chapman, O.L.; Heckert, D.C.; Reasoner, J.W.; Thackaberry, S.P. Photochemical Studies on 9-Nitroanthracene1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 5550–5554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chung, F.L.; Chen, H.J.C.; Guttenplan, J.B.; Nishikawa, A.; Hard, G.C. 2,3-Epoxy-4-hydroxynonanal as a potential tumor-initiating agent of lipid peroxidation. Carcinogenesis 1993, 14, 2073–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Esterbauer, H.; Zollner, H.; Schaur, R.J. Aldehydes Formed by Lipid Peroxidation: Mechanisms of Formation, Occurrence, and Determination. In Membrane Lipid Oxidation; Vigo-Pelfrey, C., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1990; pp. 239–268. [Google Scholar]
  48. Xia, Q.; Boudreau, M.; Zhou, Y.-T.; Yin, J.J.; Fu, P.P. UVB photoirradiation of Aloe vera—Formation of free radicals, singlet oxygen, superoxide, and induction of lipid peroxidation. J. Food Drug Anal. 2011, 19, 396–402. [Google Scholar]
  49. Fu, P.P.; Xia, Q.; Sun, X.; Yu, H. Phototoxicity and environmental transformation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons—Light-induced reactive oxygen species, lipid peroxidation, and DNA damage. J. Environ. Sci. Health C 2012, 30, 1–41. [Google Scholar]
  50. Xia, Q.; Chiang, H.M.; Zhou, Y.-T.; Yin, J.J.; Liu, F.; Wang, C.; Guo, L.; Fu, P.P. Phototoxicity of Kava—Formation of reactive oxygen species leading to lipid peroxidation and DNA damage. Am. J. Chinese Med. 2012, 40, 1271–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Stadtman, E.R.; Berlett, B.S. Reactive oxygen-mediated protein oxidation in aging and disease. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1997, 10, 485–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xia, Q.; Yin, J.-J.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, Y.-S.; Wang, Y.-Q.; Ma, L.; Chen, S.; Sun, X.; Fu, P.P.; Yu, H. UVA Photoirradiation of Nitro-Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons—Induction of Reactive Oxygen Species and Formation of Lipid Peroxides . Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10, 1062-1084. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10031062

AMA Style

Xia Q, Yin J-J, Zhao Y, Wu Y-S, Wang Y-Q, Ma L, Chen S, Sun X, Fu PP, Yu H. UVA Photoirradiation of Nitro-Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons—Induction of Reactive Oxygen Species and Formation of Lipid Peroxides . International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2013; 10(3):1062-1084. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10031062

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xia, Qingsu, Jun-Jie Yin, Yuewei Zhao, Yuh-Sen Wu, Yu-Qui Wang, Liang Ma, Shoujun Chen, Xin Sun, Peter P. Fu, and Hongtao Yu. 2013. "UVA Photoirradiation of Nitro-Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons—Induction of Reactive Oxygen Species and Formation of Lipid Peroxides " International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 10, no. 3: 1062-1084. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10031062

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop