Next Article in Journal
Why Some Employees Adopt or Resist Reorganization of Work Practices in Health Care: Associations between Perceived Loss of Resources, Burnout, and Attitudes to Change
Previous Article in Journal
Associations of Meteorology with Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Preeclampsia, Preterm Birth and Birth Weight
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spatio-Temporal Variation of PM2.5 Concentrations and Their Relationship with Geographic and Socioeconomic Factors in China

1
College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Beijing, Ding No.11 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 11A Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China
3
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 19 Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11(1), 173-186; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110100173
Submission received: 11 October 2013 / Revised: 9 December 2013 / Accepted: 10 December 2013 / Published: 20 December 2013

Abstract

:
The air quality in China, particularly the PM2.5 (particles less than 2.5 μm in aerodynamic diameter) level, has become an increasing public concern because of its relation to health risks. The distribution of PM2.5 concentrations has a close relationship with multiple geographic and socioeconomic factors, but the lack of reliable data has been the main obstacle to studying this topic. Based on the newly published Annual Average PM2.5 gridded data, together with land use data, gridded population data and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) data, this paper explored the spatial-temporal characteristics of PM2.5 concentrations and the factors impacting those concentrations in China for the years of 2001–2010. The contributions of urban areas, high population and economic development to PM2.5 concentrations were analyzed using the Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) model. The results indicated that the spatial pattern of PM2.5 concentrations in China remained stable during the period 2001–2010; high concentrations of PM2.5 are mostly found in regions with high populations and rapid urban expansion, including the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in North China, East China (including the Shandong, Anhui and Jiangsu provinces) and Henan province. Increasing populations, local economic growth and urban expansion are the three main driving forces impacting PM2.5 concentrations.

1. Introduction

Fine particulate matter (PM2.5, i.e., particles less than 2.5 μm in aerodynamic diameter) is rich in organic toxic components and has a strong association with many adverse health effects [1,2,3]. Epidemiological studies have reported associations between PM2.5 and a variety of medical diseases such as asthma, cardiovascular problems, respiratory infections, lung cancer [4] and breast cancer. The air quality in China, particularly the PM2.5 level, has become an increasing public concern because of its connection to such health risks. For example, Hu suggested that exposure to high PM levels may have deleterious effects on the duration of survival after a breast cancer diagnosis among females [5]. Zhang et al. estimated the number of people living in high-exposure areas in Beijing during the autumn of 2012 [6].
Accurate modeling of fine scale spatial variation in PM2.5 concentrations is critical for environmental and epidemiological studies. Land use regression (LUR) models are widely employed to expand in situ measurements of PM2.5 concentrations to large areas. LUR is essentially an interpolation technique that employs the PM2.5 concentrations as the dependent variable, with proximate land use, traffic and physical environmental variables used as independent predictors [7,8]. Some literature has suggested that PM emissions in urban areas has come from road traffic, household activities, energy production, building work, (inland) shipping and (small-scale) industry [9]. However, the lack of long-term monitoring data is the primary obstacle in developing countries where PM2.5 concentration sites are sparse and have only been established in recent years. Fortunately, recent studies have indicated that satellite-observed total-column aerosol optical depth (AOD) could offer spatially continuous information about PM2.5 concentrations at the global scale [10]. Mao et al. developed an AOD-enhanced space-time LUR model to predict the PM2.5 concentrations in the state of Florida in the USA [11]. Van et al. presented a global estimate of PM2.5 concentrations at 10 km × 10 km resolution for six years (2001–2006) by combing satellite-derived AOD with in situ measurements [12]. In June 2013, the Global Annual PM2.5 Grids were published by Battelle Memorial Institute and the Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN)/Columbia University; this data set represents a series of annual average grids (2001–2010) [13]. The global, 0.5 × 0.5 grid of estimated PM2.5 concentrations was developed using monthly AOD data from MODIS and MISR for the period 2001–2010; these estimates leveraged the AOD/PM2.5 surface level conversion factors calculated by van Donkelaar [12] and applied them to the gridded remote sensing data. The gridded product provides a continuous surface of PM2.5 concentrations in micrograms per cubic meter for health and environmental research.
The objective of this paper is to explore the spatio-temporal characteristics and driving forces of PM2.5 concentrations in China based on long-term newly refined data. Annual Average PM2.5 gridded data, land use data, gridded population data and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) data for the period 2001–2010 were used in the analysis. The contributions of urban areas, high population and economic development to PM2.5 concentrations were analyzed using the Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) model.

2. Data Acquisition

2.1. PM2.5 Data

The Global Annual Average PM2.5 Grids represent a series of annual average grids (2001–2010) of PM2.5, these data were obtained from the Battelle Memorial Institute and the Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN)/Columbia University, and each file obtained from Battelle/CIESIN contains integer values for a global, 0.5 × 0.5 grid of estimated PM2.5 concentrations. The average annual PM2.5 concentration for each grid cell was calculated by multiplying the MODIS and MISR mean AOD for each month by the monthly conversion factor, as in Equation (1) [13]:
Ijerph 11 00173 i001
where Ei stands for an annual-average estimated PM2.5 concentration for each grid cell; AODi,m stands for the MODIS and MISR mean AOD for each month; and ηi,m .stands for the monthly conversion factor.
The PM2.5 dataset offers spatially continuous information about PM2.5 concentrations at the global scale while it also has some uncertainties. PM2.5 concentrations derived from Battelle/CIESIN has biased values, and they may be higher or lower than those for van Donkelaar et al. in some regions such as largely arid and semi-arid countries with large desert areas [13]. The reasons for these differences are unclear. Uncertainties or limitations of the AOD data and computing methods or some other possible reasons all can cause these biases.
Data for China were extracted from the global dataset using the ArcGIS software and were transformed to the same coordinate system as the other datasets, specifically the Albers Equal Area projection system, Beijing 1954 geodetic datum and Krassovsky ellipsoid. Figure 1 shows the estimated distribution of PM2.5 concentrations in China from 2001 to 2010.

2.2. Population Data

Gridded population data in China with a spatial resolution of 1km from 2001 to 2010 were provided by the Resources and Environmental Scientific Data Center (RESDC), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [14]. These gridded population data were transformed from census data based on the relationship between demographical data and land use types, and the population data were redistributed onto 1 km × 1 km grids [14].
Figure 1. The estimated distribution of PM2.5 concentrations in China from 2001 to 2010.
Figure 1. The estimated distribution of PM2.5 concentrations in China from 2001 to 2010.
Ijerph 11 00173 g001

2.3. GDP Data

GDP is a commonly used indicator of economic development. The gridded GDP dataset for China from 2001 to 2010 was adopted in this study. The dataset was obtained from RESDC, CAS. The statistical GDP data at the county level were transformed into gridded data at a resolution of 1 km × 1 km based on the relationship between the GDP data and the land use types [15].

2.4. Land-use Data

Land-use data for China at a scale of 1:100,000 for the years 2001 and 2010 were used in this study. The datasets were obtained using Landsat TM (Thematic Mapper) and the China-Brazil Earth Resources satellite (CBERS-2) satellite images and were interpreted by experts at RESDC, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The following six land use types were identified: (1) cultivated land; (2) woodland; (3) grass land; (4) water; (5) urban and rural settlements; and (6) barren land. Areas of urban sprawl were derived from the land use data. A set of land data from field surveys was selected to guarantee the accuracy of land use classification and it is the most accurate land use dataset at this scale in China [16]. Before further processing, all of the source data were re-sampled onto a raster dataset with 1 km spatial resolution, and transformed into the same coordinate system.

3. Methodology

The spatio-temporal variations of the PM2.5 concentrations and their relationships with socioeconomic factors were evaluated using the following steps:
Step 1:
Evaluate the spatio-temporal variation of PM2.5 concentrations in China from 2001 to 2010 based on annual average PM2.5 grids.
Step 2:
Compare the distribution of PM2.5 concentrations with each of the following factors: urban areas, population and GDP. The impact of each factor on the PM2.5 concentrations was analyzed and compared.
Step 3:
Use the GWR method to evaluate the relationships between the PM2.5 concentrations and the urban areas, population and GDP.
A conventional regression method, such as ordinary least squares (OLS), is a type of global statistic that assumes that the relationship under study is constant over space and therefore assumes that the parameter is the same for the entire study area [17]. The GWR model extends the traditional standard regression framework to estimate local, rather than global, parameters [18]. The GWR model is a type of local statistic that produces a set of local parameter estimates that show how a relationship varies over space. This visualization enables examining the spatial pattern of the local statistics to gain a better understanding of possible hidden causes for that pattern [19]. The global regression model can be expressed as follows:
Ijerph 11 00173 i002
We can obtain the vector estimates of the parameters using OLS:
α = (XT X)‒1 XTY
Where α is the vector estimate of the parameters, and X is the matrix composed of the observed values of the independent variable; the first column elements of X are 1. Y is composed of the observed values of the dependent variable [20].
The GWR method considered the local estimates of the parameters, and the model is extended to (1):
Ijerph 11 00173 i003
Where (Ui,Vi) is the space coordinate of sample point i and αk(Ui,Vi) is the value of the continuous function αk(U,V) on point i. If αk(U,V) remains unchanged in space, the model (3) is translated into the global regression model. Therefore, the GWR equation considers the spatial variability of the relationship:
A(Ui,Vi) = (XTW (Ui,Vi)X)‒1 XT W(Ui,Vi)Y
where W(Ui,Vi) is the range weight matrix [20,21].

4. Results and Analysis

4.1. Spatio-temporal Variation of PM2.5 Concentrations in China

The World Health Organization (WHO) defined the standard for the annual average PM2.5 concentration to be less than 10 μg/m3 [22]. The human illness rate will increase immensely when the annual average concentrations reach 35 μg/m3 (Target 1 level). However, China’s air quality standard for the annual average PM2.5 concentration is 35 μg/m3 [23]. Temporal profiles of the areas of each PM2.5 concentration level from 2001 to 2010 are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Temporal profiles of the areas in China for which PM2.5 concentrations are below 10 μg/m3 or above 35 μg/m3 from 2001 to 2010.
Figure 2. Temporal profiles of the areas in China for which PM2.5 concentrations are below 10 μg/m3 or above 35 μg/m3 from 2001 to 2010.
Ijerph 11 00173 g002
Figure 3 shows the regions whose concentrations have exceeded 35 μg/m3 in China for the years 2001 and 2010. Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6 show the distribution of population, GDP and urban area in China for the years 2001 and 2010. From these maps, we can see the spatial variation of PM2.5, population, GDP and urban areas in China for 2001 and 2010 and the area of the IT-1 level defined by WHO (annual mean PM2.5 concentration in excess of 35µg/m3) slowly increased by 7.2%/a on average from 2001 to 2007 and decreased by 7.5%/a on average from 2007 to 2010.
We hypothesize that higher populations and GDP levels may cause higher PM2.5 concentrations and that a larger urban area results in higher PM2.5 concentrations. Thus, we build the regression model to study the correlation between the PM2.5 concentrations and the population, GDP and urban area in China for 2001 and 2010 to evaluate the determinants of the increase in PM2.5 concentrations.
Figure 3. WHO target levels for PM2.5 concentrations in regions of China for (a) 2001 and (b) 2010.
Figure 3. WHO target levels for PM2.5 concentrations in regions of China for (a) 2001 and (b) 2010.
Ijerph 11 00173 g003
Figure 4. Population distribution in China for (a) 2001 and (b) 2010.
Figure 4. Population distribution in China for (a) 2001 and (b) 2010.
Ijerph 11 00173 g004
Figure 5. GDP distribution in China for (a) 2001 and (b) 2010.
Figure 5. GDP distribution in China for (a) 2001 and (b) 2010.
Ijerph 11 00173 g005
Figure 6. Urban areas in China for (a) 2001 and (b) 2010.
Figure 6. Urban areas in China for (a) 2001 and (b) 2010.
Ijerph 11 00173 g006

4.2. Correlation between PM2.5 Concentrations and Socioeconomic Issues

Before geographically weighted regression can occur, one initial statistical analysis can determine the characteristics of each of the variables proposed for the model. We use liner regression models to examine the correlation between PM2.5 and each variable. The summary statistical results are shown in Table 1. All of the associations with PM2.5 are in the expected direction.
Table 1. The summarized statistical results of the initial statistical analysis.
Table 1. The summarized statistical results of the initial statistical analysis.
Variable2001 2010
R *CorrelationR *Correlation
PM2.5Population0.41positive 0.50positive
GDP0.59positive 0.58positive
Urban area0.59positive 0.59positive
Notes: * R is the correlation coefficient between PM2.5 and population, GDP and urban area. All the results have statistical significance. The P value of each regression is less than 0.05.
We adopted the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) to detect whether there existed the co-linearity problem among the indicators. With SPSS software, we found that the VIF values of population, GDP and urban area are 2.79, 2.58, 2.12 of the year 2001, separately; and 3.63, 3.60, 2.31 of the year 2010, separately. So we should not worry about the co-linearity problem since the VIF values range from 0 to 10, even though there may be some correlations among the three factors.
The GWR model is run with ArcGIS 9.3 software. We built a GWR model of the correlation between PM2.5 concentrations and population, GDP and urban area in China for 2001 and 2010. The GWR model produces a set of local regression results including local parameter estimates and local residuals, which can be mapped to show their spatial variability. In this study, we have chosen an ADAPTIVE kernel whose bandwidth will be found by minimizing the corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc) value.
From the report created by the GWR tool, we can obtain the local R2 and the local R2 Adjusted (the adjusted R2). The local R2 values for 2001 and 2010 are 0.820 and 0.822, respectively. The local R2 adjusted values for 2001 and 2010 are 0.810 and 0.815, respectively. The values for the two years are very closewhich can denote that the overall performance of the model relatively high in both of the two models. The values of the standardized residual (StdResid) for 2001 and 2010 can be mapped; these are shown in Figure 7. Not surprisingly, some unusually high or low residuals can be observed. Those regions with some desert area have very large residuals (StdResid > 2). For example, the PM2.5 concentrations in the northwest region of Xinjiang are high because of the desert. Xinjiang has a high incidence zone of dust explosion. The concentrations of dust aerosol at altitude are closely related to the surface conditions below; the concentrations of particles above the desert areas will be greater than those in the vegetation-covered areas [24]. Therefore, the high PM2.5 concentrations in desert regions are mainly related to the dusty weather. The southern Hebei province, the northern Henan province and the northwest Shandong province also have much higher residuals because they are high pollution emission regions of northern China. For example, the Shijiazhuang Iron and Steel Company discharges an average of more than 2000 t/a of PM2.5. There are also many polluting enterprises in the urban areas [25]. The pollution in these regions is always more serious than the pollution in other regions. In addition, the Sichuan basin has high residuals because of its high aerosol optical depth values. The optical depth of the Sichuan Basin is higher than its surrounding areas due to its geographical climate characteristics; its annual average optical depth is approximately 0.7 [26]. PM2.5 has a strong positive correlation with AOD [27], so the Sichuan Basin has high PM2.5 concentrations. Regions that are rich in marine salt can also have high PM2.5 concentrations [28]. Those regions have a noticeable over-prediction of PM2.5 concentrations; this warrants closer inspection to discover the possible explanations. In those regions, the model under-predicts the levels of PM2.5 concentrations [18]. However, the regions with StdResid values in the range of −2 to 2 account for 94.8% and 94.6% of the whole country, which indicates that the relations between PM2.5 and that each of the three factors are stable. What’s more, we can also obtain from the results that the regions with the positive value of the local coefficients for urban areas, population, and GDP account for 92.72%, 90.52% and 95.62% respectively in 2001 and 92.01%, 95.29% and 90.50% respectively in 2010 of the whole country. There is agreement with our expectation on the direction of the influence of those variables.
Figure 7. Maps of standardized residuals from the GWR model in China for the years (a) 2001 and (b) 2010.
Figure 7. Maps of standardized residuals from the GWR model in China for the years (a) 2001 and (b) 2010.
Ijerph 11 00173 g007

5. Discussion

Most of the associations between the PM2.5 concentrations and the other variables considered are in the expected direction. PM2.5 is correlated to population, GDP and urban area. Therefore, we have sufficient reason to believe that the regions with large populations, high values of GDP and large urban areas would have high values of PM2.5.
In China, PM2.5 mainly comes from human activities (motor vehicle tail gas dust and coal dust) and the karaburan; the ground dust and secondary particles of the karaburan also contribute to the PM2.5 concentrations [29,30]. Human activities that have a strong impact on the air quality are often sources of PM2.5; therefore, some cities with poor air quality have a high level of PM2.5. Metropolitan areas have large populations, high GDP values, large proportions of urbanization and industries that produce contaminants [31]. From Figure 2, we can see that the high PM2.5 values are mainly concentrated in the regions with large populations, high GDP values and large proportions of urbanization. For example, in Beijing, the values of PM2.5 have a linear relation with motor vehicle tail gas dust, coal dust and karaburan [32,33,34]. Population growth and economic development are accelerating the environmental deterioration in Beijing [31]. In addition, some research shows that, in Tianjin and Chongqing, the PM2.5 concentrations are dependent on motor vehicle exhaust dust, coal dust and karaburan [35,36,37]. In some large cities, the pollution from coal, other fuels and industrial pollution impacts particulate matter concentrations [38]. In addition, PM2.5 concentrations are dependent on temperature, humidity and rainfall in some regions [39]. Each area has its own leading factor that influences PM2.5 concentrations. Future work might include partitioning the different factors impacting PM2.5 concentrations.

6. Conclusions

In this study, spatio-temporal characteristics and factors impacting PM2.5 concentrations in China for the years 2001–2010 were evaluated based on newly refined long-term data. The following main conclusions are reached:
(1)
In general, the spatial pattern of PM2.5 concentrations in China has remained stable during the period 2001–2010. The area of the IT-1 level defined by the WHO (annual mean PM2.5 concentration in excess of 35 µg/m3) slowly increased by 7.2%/a on average from 2001 to 2007 and decreased by 7.5%/a on average from 2007 to 2010.
(2)
PM2.5 is mostly concentrated in regions with high populations, GDP and large urban regions, including the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in north China, east China (including the Shandong, Anhui and Jiangsu provinces), the Henan province. The Sichuan basin is one exception to this result.
This paper, for the first time, presents a comprehensive insight into the spatio-temporal characteristics of PM2.5 concentrations in China at national scale. However, the problem is complex and needs further attention.

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. KZZD-EW-08 and Grant No. XDA05050102).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gu, J.; Schnelle-Kreis, J.; Pitz, M.; Diemer, J.; Reller, A.; Zimmermann, R.; Soentgen, J.; Peters, A.; Cyrys, J. Spatial and temporal variability of PM10 sources in Augsburg, Germany. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 71, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pey, J.; Alastuey, A.; Querol, X. PM10 and PM2.5 sources at an insular location in the western Mediterranean by using source apportionment techniques. Sci. Total Envir. 2013, 456–457, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sampson, P.D.; Richards, M.; Szpiro, A.A.; Bergen, S.; Sheppard, L.; Larson, T.V.; Kaufman, J. A regionalized national universal kriging model using partial least squares regression for estimating annual PM2.5 concentrations in epidemiology. Atmos. Environ. 2012, 75, 383–392. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pope III, C.A. Review: Epidemiological basis for particulate air pollution health standards. Aerosol Sci. Tech. 2000, 32, 4–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hu, H.; Dailey, A.B.; Kan, H.; Xu, X. The effect of atmospheric particulate matter on survival of breast cancer among USA females. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2013, 139, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, A.; Qi, Q.; Jiang, L.; Zhou, F.; Wang, J. Population exposure to PM2.5 in the urban area of Beijing. PLoS One 2013, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tai, A.P.K.; Mickley, L.J.; Jacob, D.J. Correlations between fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and meteorological variables in the United States: Implications for the sensitivity of PM2.5 to climate change. Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44, 3976–3984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Beckerman, B.S.; Jerrett, M.; Martin, R.V.; van Donkelaar, A.; Ross, Z.; Burnett, R.T. Application of the to selecting deletion/substitution/addition algorithm land use regression models for interpolating air pollution measurements in California. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 77, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Keuken, M.P.; Moerman, M.; Voogt, M.; Blom, M.; Weijers, E.P.; Rockmann, T.; Dusek, U. Source contributions to PM2.5 and PM10 at an urban background and a street location. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 71, 26–35. [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu, Y. New Directions: Satellite driven PM2.5 exposure models to support targeted particle pollution health effects research. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 68, 52–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mao, L.; Qiu, Y.; Kusano, C.; Xu, X. Predicting regional space—Time variation of PM2.5 with land-use regression model and MODIS data. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2012, 19, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Van Donkelaar, A.; Martin, R.V.; Brauer, M.; Kahn, R.; Levy, R.; Verduzco, C.; Villeneuve, P.J. Global estimates of ambient fine particulate matter concentrations from satellite-based aerosol optical depth: Development and application. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010, 118, 847–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Battelle Memorial Institute; CIESIN. Global Annual Average PM2.5 Grids from MODIS and MISR Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD), 2001–2010. Available online: http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/sdei-global-annual-avg-pm2-5-2001-2010 (accessed on 11 December 2013).
  14. Yang, X.; Jiang, D.; Wang, N.; Liu, H. Method of pixelizing population data. J. Geogr. Sci. 2002, 57, 70–75. [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang, Y.; Jiang, D.; Zhuang, D.; Zhu, Y.; Fu, J. An improved approach for modeling spatial distribution of water use profit—A case study in Tuhai Majia basin, China. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 36, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Deng, X.; Su, H.; Zhan, J. Integration of multiple data sources to simulate the dynamics of land systems. Sensors 2008, 8, 620–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tsai, P.-J. Scrub typhus and comparisons of four main ethnic communities in Taiwan in 2004 vs. 2008 using geographically weighted regression. Glob. J. Health Sci. 2013, 5, 101–114. [Google Scholar]
  18. Brunsdon, C. Geographically weighted regression: A natural evolution of the expansion method for spatial data analysis. Environ. Plan. A 1998, 30, 1905–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fotheringham, A.S.; Brunsdon, C.; Charlton, M. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  20. Su, F. The space factor analysis of county economic development based on geographical weighted regression model-take county of Liaoning province for example. Acad. Forum 2005, 5, 81–84. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  21. Tan, W. The Basic Theoretics and Application Research on Geographically Weighted Regression. Master Thesis, Tongji University, Shanghai, China, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen, Z.; Ma, H.; Xie, W. Compare of ambient air quality standards between China and WHO. J. Environ. Health 2008, 25, 1103–1103. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  23. National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.html (accessed on 11 December).
  24. Niu, S.; Sun, Z. Aircraft Observation on Dust Aerosol and Spatial-temporal Distribution Characteristic of PM2.5 in Desert Area. (in Chinese). In Atmospheric Aerosols and Their Effects on Climate, Proceedings of Chinese Meteorological Society Annual Conference 2003, Beijing, China, 8–12 December 2003.
  25. Zhao, B. The Research of Air Pollution Source Emission for the North China. Master Thesis, Chinese Acadamy of Meteorology Sciences, Beijing, China, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, C.; Mao, J.; Lau, A.K.-H. Characteristics of aerosol optical depth distributions over Sichuan basin derived from modis data. J. Appl. Meteor. Sci. 2003, 14, 1–7. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  27. Lin, H.; Xin, J.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Chen, C. Comparison of atmospheric particulate matter and aerosol optical depth in Beijing city. Environ. Sci. 2013, 3, 826–834. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang, M.; Hu, M. Sea salt source contribution to the aerosol in Qingdao seashore area. Environ. Sci. 2000, 21, 83–85. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  29. Chen, Z.; Su, G.; Zhang, J. Measurement and analysis for atoms perrier aerosol particulates in Beijing. Res. Environ Sci. 1994, 7, 1–9. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  30. Hao, M.; Lin, T.; Liu, Y. Current pollution status and pollution characteristics of PM2.5 in China. Environ. Sci. Manage. 2006, 31, 58–61. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang, J. Reseach on Interplay of Population Growth, Environment Pollution and Economic Development in Beijing. Master Thesis, Captial University of Economics and Businee, Beijing, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yang, F.; He, K.; Ma, Y. Characteristics and sources of trace elements in ambient PM2.5 in Beijing. Environ. Sci. 2003, 24, 33–37. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  33. Yang, F.; He, K.; Ma, Y. Variation characteristics of PM2.5 concentration and its relationship with PM10 and TSP in Beijing. China Environ. Sci. 2002, 22, 506–510. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang, G. Pollution Characteristics and Source Analysis of Elements of the PM2.5 in Northeast Beijing. Master Thesis, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gu, J.; Dong, H.; Wu, L.; Bai, Z.; Zhao, J. The analysis of pollution characteristics and sources of inorganic element of PM2.5 in Tianjin. J. Highw. Transp. Res. Develop. 2010, 495–500. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhao, Q.; Zhang, D.; Ye, T.; Zheng, J.; Lu, L.; Wang, F.; Li, Y.; Dong, S. Research on PM10 source apportionment in main districts of Chongqing. Environ. Impac. Ass. 2008, 1, 14–17. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang, T. Source Apportionment and Pollution Characteristics of PM2.5 in Chongqing. Master Thesis, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  38. Wei, F.; Teng, E.; Wu, G. Concentrations and elemental components of PM2.5, PM10 in ambient air in four large Chinese cities. Environ. Monit. China 2001, 17, 1–6. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Xu, W.; Huang, M. Analysis on the pollution characteristics and influence factors of PM2.5 in Guangzhou. Environ. Monit. China 2013, 29, 15–21. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, G.; Fu, J.; Jiang, D.; Hu, W.; Dong, D.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, M. Spatio-Temporal Variation of PM2.5 Concentrations and Their Relationship with Geographic and Socioeconomic Factors in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 173-186. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110100173

AMA Style

Lin G, Fu J, Jiang D, Hu W, Dong D, Huang Y, Zhao M. Spatio-Temporal Variation of PM2.5 Concentrations and Their Relationship with Geographic and Socioeconomic Factors in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2014; 11(1):173-186. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110100173

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Gang, Jingying Fu, Dong Jiang, Wensheng Hu, Donglin Dong, Yaohuan Huang, and Mingdong Zhao. 2014. "Spatio-Temporal Variation of PM2.5 Concentrations and Their Relationship with Geographic and Socioeconomic Factors in China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11, no. 1: 173-186. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110100173

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop