Next Article in Journal
Bisphenol-A: Epigenetic Reprogramming and Effects on Reproduction and Behavior
Next Article in Special Issue
Study of Epigenetic Properties of Poly(HexaMethylene Biguanide) Hydrochloride (PHMB)
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Epidemiological Evaluation of Notifications of Environmental Events in the State of São Paulo, Brazil
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 11
Issue 7
10.3390/ijerph110707524
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhancement of Arsenic Trioxide-Mediated Changes in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (IPS)

by
Barbara Graham
1,*,†,
Jacqueline Stevens
2,
Phatia Wells
1,
Jennifer Sims
1,
Christian Rogers
4,
Sophia S. Leggett
3,
Stephen Ekunwe
4 and
Kenneth Ndebele
1,*,†
1
Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Target Validation, Department of Biology, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS 39217, USA
2
RCMI Molecular Core Lab, Department of Biology, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS 39217, USA
3
Department of Behavioral and Environmental Health, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS 39217, USA
4
Department of Biology, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS 39217, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11(7), 7524-7536; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110707524
Submission received: 31 January 2014 / Revised: 4 May 2014 / Accepted: 7 May 2014 / Published: 22 July 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Proceedings from the Tenth International Symposium on Recent Advances in Environmental Health Research)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Induced pluripotent stem cells (IPS) are an artificially derived type of pluripotent stem cell, showing many of the same characteristics as natural pluripotent stem cells. IPS are a hopeful therapeutic model; however there is a critical need to determine their response to environmental toxins. Effects of arsenic on cells have been studied extensively; however, its effect on IPS is yet to be elucidated. Arsenic trioxide (ATO) has been shown to inhibit cell proliferation, induce apoptosis and genotoxicity in many cells. Based on ATOs action in other cells, we hypothesize that it will induce alterations in morphology, inhibit cell viability and induce a genotoxic effect on IPS. Cells were treated for 24 hours with ATO (0–9 µg/mL). Cell morphology, viability and DNA damage were documented. Results indicated sufficient changes in morphology of cell colonies mainly in cell ability to maintain grouping and ability to remain adherent. Cell viability decreased in a dose dependent manner. There were significant increases in tail length and moment as well as destruction of intact DNA as concentration increased. Exposure to ATO resulted in a reproducible dose dependent sequence of events marked by changes in morphology, decrease of cell viability, and induction of genotoxicity in IPS.

1. Introduction

Arsenic is a naturally occurring element widely distributed throughout the environment, found in rocks, soil, water, air, plants and animals [1,2]. The inorganic form of arsenic is highly toxic (combined with oxygen, iron, chlorine, and sulfur) while the organic form is not thought to be linked to cancer [3]. Based on epidemiological evidence, arsenic has been listed as a human carcinogen [4,5,6]. Humans are exposed to inorganic compounds via inhalation, ingestion of food, contaminated drinking water (the major exposure route) [7] and eye or dermal contact [8]. Chronic exposure to arsenic has been associated with different types of cancer and provoking formation of various solid tumors– lung, skin, liver, bladder [9,10,11,12,13,14], renal, [15] and prostate [16] cancers—as well as other malignancies including hypertension, type 2 diabetes [17], and blackfoot disease [18]. Arsenic compounds, alone or in combination with other agents, have also been used as a therapeutic agent [19] for human disease (acute promyelocytic leukemia) as a first-line therapy resulting in high rates of complete and molecular remission [20,21] as well as agricultural applications (insecticides and fertilizers) [22,23] and poultry [24,25] and swine [26] feed. In mammalian cells, various studies have found that arsenic has a cytotoxic [27,28,29] and/or genotoxic potential [30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. A major mechanism by which arsenic exhibits its effects on target cells is through generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [37], loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, and release of cytochrome c, resulting in programmed cell death (apoptosis) [38,39,40,41]. Studies show that there is a clear induction of genotoxic effects and a decrease in the proliferation index that reflects its toxic potential [42,43]. Elucidation of the precise molecular mechanisms of arsenic’s mode of operation is critical to our understanding of how it wields its toxicity in different cells.
The great concern to the well-being and health security of humans has made arsenic a target for extensive study. Because of arsenics potential use as a therapeutic agent, it was important to determine its effect on a relatively new line of cells known as human induced pluripotent stem cells (IPS). IPS is not to be confused with embryonic stem cells (ES). ES cells and IPS cells are similar in their functions; however, they harbor subtle differences such as distinct origins and modes of derivation [44]. IPS cells have the key features of ES cells, in that they have the ability to propagate in culture indefinitely and the capacity to generate cells from all three embryonic germ layers [45,46,47].
Both play a major role in research individually as well as complementary. The discovery and isolation of stem cells brought with it the potential to understand early human development, tissue formation and differentiation through in vitro. As IPS become more prominent in research, it is expected that discoveries made using these cells will enhance future drug development or other therapeutic interventions [48].
The potential of IPS cells include drug discovery transformation by providing toxic compound identification, target validation and tool discovery [49,50,51,52,53]. ATO has been shown to inhibit cell proliferation, induce apoptosis and genotoxicity in many cells. The aim of this study is to determine the role ATO has on cell morphology, growth and DNA changes on IPS cells.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Chemicals, Reagents and Supplies

The following reagents and supplies were used: Matrigel™ (354230, BD Biosciences®, San Jose, CA, USA), mTeSR™1 Medium (05850, Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada), DMEM/-F-12 Medium (11330-057, Invitrogen, city, Grand Island, NY, USA), Dispase (17105-041, Invitrogen), Comet assay kit (Trevigen Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Arsenic trioxide (ATO, 1,000 ppm, SA449-100), 6-well plates (140675, Nunc), and sterile glass serological pipettes (13-678-27E, Fisher) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Suwanee, GA, USA). All other chemicals (analytical reagent grade) were purchased from commercial sources.

2.2. Cell Line

IPS cells, (Foreskin)1-MCB-01, were purchased from University of Wisconsin (Madison, WI, USA) Laboratory of Dr. James Thomson through the supporting organization of WiCell Research Institute (Madison, WI, USA).

2.3. Cell Culture and Exposure

Protocol for plating cells were followed based on WiCell Feeder Independent Pluripotent Stem Cell Protocols (SOP Number: SOP-SH-002). Briefly, matrigel plates were prepared at least 2 hours before cell culturing (0.5 mg/6 well plate) and matrigel removed immediately before adding cell suspension. Cells were suspended in 3 ml mTeSR™1 Medium. To the 6-well plates, 1.5 mL mTeSR™1 medium and 0.5 mL of the cell suspension was added drop-wise into each well. Plates were placed gently into 37 °C in 5% CO2 humidified incubators. Media was changed daily. Cells were passaged using 1 mL of room temperature filtered sterile dispase solution (dispase 2 mg/mL DMEM-F12 Medium). Plate(s) was incubated for 3 minutes, and viewed under microscope to determine if cells were partially detached from plate. Cells were gently washed two times with 1 mL of DMEM/F-12, followed by cell scaping using a 5 mL glass pipette containing 1 mL of medium. Contents were pooled into a sterile conical tube and gently pipetted to dislodge any colonies. Cells were resuspended to make a total of 2.0 mL of medium and cells in each of the new wells (0.5 mL of cell suspension + 1.5 mL of mTeSRTM1 medium). Cells were allowed to grow until signs of differentiation were noticed (day 4), Cell colonies were counted in each well of the 6 plates to ensure consistency in plating. Each of the six plates represented a concentration of arsenic. A stock solution of ATO (100 µg /mL) was prepared and diluted to appropriate concentrations in cell culture medium (mTeSR™1). The plates were treated with ATO at concentrations of 0, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 µg/mL for 24 hours.

2.4. Cell Morphology

After the 24 hour incubation period with arsenic, morphology of IPS was observed using an Olympus Inverted Phase Contrast Microscope with Camera (C-Squared, magnification 200×) and photographs of each well was taken.

2.5. Cell Viability/Cytotoxicity

After exposure to arsenic, cell colonies were counted in each well and compared with the control using the phase-contrast microscope. Untreated sets (0) were used as the controls. To demonstrate the growth inhibition induced in induced pluripotent stem cells by arsenic after 24 hours, viable cell numbers were also counted using trypan blue staining.

2.6. Determination of DNA Damage (Genotoxicity)

Comet Assay was used to evaluate genotoxicity by quantifying and analyzing DNA damage in individual cells. The assay was performed according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Trevigen, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA)) with slight modifications. Cells were incubated for 24 hours in 5% CO2 at 37 °C in the presence of ATO. After incubation, cells were detached using dispase, centrifuged, washed three times with cold PBS and viability evaluated using the trypan blue exclusion assay. The pellet was re-suspended (1 × 105cells/mL) in PBS (Ca2+ and Mg2+ free). The cells were combined with molten LMAgarose (37 °C) at a ratio of 1:10 (v/v), and 75 μL was immediately pipetted onto CometSlideTM. The slides were placed flat in a refrigerator at 4 °C for 10–20 min, and then immersed in prechilled lysis solution at 4 °C for 45 minutes. Excess buffer was drained from slides and they were immersed in alkaline Unwinding Solution for 60 minutes in the dark at room temperature. Slides were placed in electrophoresis tank and covered with 950 mL prechilled alkaline electrophoresis solution, with power supply set at 21 V for 30 minutes. Excess electrophoresis solution was drained, slides were immersed twice in dH2O for 5 minutes each, then in 70% ethanol for 5 minutes. Samples were then allowed to dry overnight at room temperature, stained with SYBR Green and allowed to set for 24 h. For examining stained comet slides, 150 comets were scored per concentration and 75 comets were randomly selected and viewed using the Olympus Epifluorescence Microscope, and analyzed by the LAI Automated Comet Assay Analysis System (Loates Associates, Inc., Westminister, MD, USA). The parameters (tail length and olive tail moment) were selected for DNA damage quantification in the IPS as determined by the software.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

A minimum of three independent experiments were carried out in duplicate for each experiment. Data was expressed as the mean (±standard deviation). Student’s paired t-test was used to analyze the difference between the control and ATO-treated cells. All p-values <0.05 were considered to be significant. QI Macros software was used.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Arsenic Trioxide on Morphological Changes

Comparison of the morphology of control/untreated and ATO-treated IPS cells was observed using an Olympus Inverted Phase Contrast Microscope with Camera (C-Squared, mag 200×) at concentrations of 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 µg/mL (Figure 1A−F). After 24 hour ATO exposure, changes in the morphology were visible in cells with 3 μg/mL and above (Figure 1C−F). Cells began to detach from the surface of the plate, and lose their round shape adopting a more spherical one. Cells were no longer in a uniform state being held together in colonies. As concentration of arsenic increased (5, 7, and 9 µg/mL), the cell colonies began to disaggregate into single cells (Figure 1D−F).
Ijerph 11 07524 g001 1024
Figure 1. Morphological changes in IPS colonies after 24 hour ATO exposure. Control (A) and ATO-treated (B) 1.0, (C) 3.0, (D) 5.0, (E) 7.0 and (F) 9.0 μg/mL IPS were observed using an Olympus Inverted Phase Contrast Microscope with Camera (C-Squared, mag 200×). A and B maintained their original shape and continued to grow in a uniform manner, while at (C) 3 µg/mL cells begin to lose adherence to plate and become disengaged. At the higher concentrations 5−9 µg/mL (D−F), cells lost all ability to remain attached and lost the round shape associated with IPS.
Figure 1. Morphological changes in IPS colonies after 24 hour ATO exposure. Control (A) and ATO-treated (B) 1.0, (C) 3.0, (D) 5.0, (E) 7.0 and (F) 9.0 μg/mL IPS were observed using an Olympus Inverted Phase Contrast Microscope with Camera (C-Squared, mag 200×). A and B maintained their original shape and continued to grow in a uniform manner, while at (C) 3 µg/mL cells begin to lose adherence to plate and become disengaged. At the higher concentrations 5−9 µg/mL (D−F), cells lost all ability to remain attached and lost the round shape associated with IPS.
Ijerph 11 07524 g001

3.2. Effect of Arsenic Trioxide on Cell Viability

We also quantified the extent of cell viability of human IPS in the presence of ATO using Trypan Blue Exclusion Assay. Light microscopy was used to distinguish viable from non-viable cells. The results demonstrated a concentration-dependent cytotoxicity after exposure to arsenic (Figure 2). The results observed after 24 h of exposure to ATO (0, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 µg/mL) were 100%, 78%, 62.0%, 45%, 37% and 12% respectively, showing a LD50 value of ~4.5 μg/mL.
Ijerph 11 07524 g002 1024
Figure 2. Cell viability of ATO-treated IPS after 24 hour exposure. IPS were treated for treated for 24 hours with ATO (0, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 µg/mL). Results showed a dose dependent decrease in cell viability with the a LD50 value being ~4.5 μg/mL. Each value represents the mean ± standard error of three experiments performed in triplicate. Student’s paired t-test was used to analyze the difference between the control and ATO-treated cells. All p-values <0.05 were considered to be significant denoted by *.
Figure 2. Cell viability of ATO-treated IPS after 24 hour exposure. IPS were treated for treated for 24 hours with ATO (0, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 µg/mL). Results showed a dose dependent decrease in cell viability with the a LD50 value being ~4.5 μg/mL. Each value represents the mean ± standard error of three experiments performed in triplicate. Student’s paired t-test was used to analyze the difference between the control and ATO-treated cells. All p-values <0.05 were considered to be significant denoted by *.
Ijerph 11 07524 g002

3.3. Arsenic Trioxide Promotes DNA Damage

To examine whether ATO induces DNA damage, we performed a comet assay, which can be used to detect single cell DNA damage by the cellular elution patterns in agarose gels. The comet assay showed that ATO altered the elution profiles by promoting the accumulation of DNA damage. Comparison of DNA damage for controls (0) and ATO treated cells was measured as percent tail DNA and olive tail moment. The microphotographs (Figure 3A−E) represent changes due to damaged DNA at 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 μg/mL, respectively after 24 h ATO exposure. The cells exposed to increasing concentrations of ATO showed more DNA damage in cells than the control cells. At the highest concentration (9 μg/mL), cells were too disintegrated for analysis, therefore, are not shown (Figure 3). In the Comet assay, the tail length measure the distance of DNA migration from the body of the nuclear core after 24 h of exposure to different concentrations of ATO. Results showed an increase in the extent (tail length) of DNa damage as concentrations increased (Figure 4A). Olive tail moment shows the smallest detectable size of migrating DNA (reflected in the comet tail length) and the number of relaxed/broken pieces (represented by the intensity of DNA in the tail) was recorded. Results were consistent with tail length percent (Figure 4B).
Ijerph 11 07524 g003 1024
Figure 3. Representative microphotographs of Comets indicating changes in DNA content based on increasing ATO concentration after 24h exposure. (A) 0, (B) 1, (C) 3, (D) 5, and (E) (7 μg/mL ATO) represent damaged DNA , results showed increased damage as indicative of the increase in tail length.
Figure 3. Representative microphotographs of Comets indicating changes in DNA content based on increasing ATO concentration after 24h exposure. (A) 0, (B) 1, (C) 3, (D) 5, and (E) (7 μg/mL ATO) represent damaged DNA , results showed increased damage as indicative of the increase in tail length.
Ijerph 11 07524 g003
Ijerph 11 07524 g004 1024
Figure 4. Tail Length and Olive tail moment after 24 hour of ATO exposure to IPS cells. (A) The tail length increased as dose increased showing an increase in DNA damage. (B) Olive tail moment which shows the smallest detectable size of migrating DNA (reflected in tail length), these results were consistent with tail length and the comet representative. All p-values <0.05 were considered to be significant as denoted by ×.
Figure 4. Tail Length and Olive tail moment after 24 hour of ATO exposure to IPS cells. (A) The tail length increased as dose increased showing an increase in DNA damage. (B) Olive tail moment which shows the smallest detectable size of migrating DNA (reflected in tail length), these results were consistent with tail length and the comet representative. All p-values <0.05 were considered to be significant as denoted by ×.
Ijerph 11 07524 g004

4. Discussion

Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that a close association exists between the elevated levels of arsenic and the incidence of certain cancers. Arsenic has been categorized as a human carcinogen based on its cytotoxic effects. There are several reports on the effect of arsenic on certain cell lines but its action on the newly derived induced pluripotent stem cells has yet to be discovered. In this study, our team reports on the effect that ATO has on morphology, proliferation/survival and genotoxicity of human induced pluripotent stem cells. This study is very important to the scientific world because scientist can focus on the potential use of IPS as a tool for drug development, transplantation medicine and other therapeutic modeling [48].
Arsenic has been shown to induce changes in cell morphology [54,55,56]; therefore, we first examined morphological changes that ATO causes on IPS. As studies have shown in other cell lines, changes in cell colony integrity and adherence occurred when IPS was treated with ATO. Cell shrinkage occurred in all treated cells but was most prominent at higher concentrations. Cells were no longer able to maintain adherence as levels increased above 3 µg/mL. Once the cells lost adherence ability, survival decreased. Our results, as does existing literature, demonstrated that ATO induce morphological changes including inability to maintain a round shape and cells begin to scatter having no definite shape, this in turn affected cells ability to maintain its consistent shape and adherence pattern.
The growth and survival of many different cells have been markedly inhibited by arsenic at low levels of treatment [27,35,40,43,57,58,59,60]. In this study, cell proliferation and survival were assessed using the trypan blue exclusion assay. Results showed that arsenic inhibited cell viability in a dose dependent manner when exposed to human induced pluripotent stem cells which is consistent with previous studies suggesting that the arsenic decreases cell viability in a dose dependent manner.
Arsenic trioxide’s effect on genotoxicity has been analyzed extensively in a wide range of in vitro studies [29,35,36,43]. Overall, studies have shown that it is likely that arsenic directly and/or indirectly induces genotoxic effects, including an increase in micronucleus frequency and a decrease in the proliferation index that reflects its toxic potential. In use of the Comet assay, studies have shown that ATO treatment increased accumulation of DNA damage [34,35,61]. In the present study, various concentrations of ATO caused an increase in tail length and olive tail moment which was indicative of DNA damage after 24 hours of treatment when compared with controls.
Arsenic is a chemotherapy agent, its mode of action is not completely understood but it has been shown to block the growth of some cancer cells. The dosage use in humans is based on body weight and range from 0.06 to 0.2 mg/kg/day [62]. Because this is the first published study using IPS and ATO, we used concentrations of ATO that have been shown to cause an effect in vitro. Further studies will be done to look at different time periods and dosage.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, ATO cause significant changes in induced pluripotent stem cells. Of interest for future investigations will be the long-term effect of arsenic at very low levels on this particular cell line as well as alterations in gene expression. Our results demonstrate ATO enhanced changes in morphology by decreasing adherence and cells lost cell membrane integrity allowing for non-conformity; cell viability decreased as concentration increased; and an induction of DNA strand breaks in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Exposure to arsenic may change the way cells communicate with each other, as well as alter their functionality. Although much additional research is needed, this is a major step toward identifying some of the changes afforded human induced pluripotent stem cells by arsenic. As more information is reported on arsenic, it is important to broaden the knowledge of its human health effects both short term and long term.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Center for Research resources Grant No. 5G12RR01345915 and National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Grant No. (8G12MD007581-15) from NIH. Support was also provided by grant No. 1008708, Transforming the Climate and Advancing STEM Women at JSU, an HBCU in the South (JSUAdvance). We would like to thank Candace King for her assistance in the lab.

Author Contributions

Barbara Graham principally conceived the idea for the study and was responsible for the design of the study, wrote the initial draft of the manuscript, and wrote all successive drafts of the manuscript. Kenneth Ndebele was instrumental in designing the study, the interpretation of findings and editing the manuscript. Jacqueline Stevens and Sophia Leggette provided critical review and manuscript editing. Stephen Ekunwe contributed to the methodological design of the study and data analysis. Phatia Wells was responsible for setting up experiments along with Jennifer Sims and Christian Rogers completed the experiments and retrieved data. All authors participated in some form in the concept, experimentation, writing and/or editing of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  1. WHO. Arsenic. Available online: www.who.int/entity/mediacentre/factsheets/fs372/en/-35k (accessed on 13 June 2013).
  2. Asiedu-Steiner, M.; Anderson, K.A.; Vuvor, F.; Asiedu, K. Exposure to arsenic in drinking water—Public health debates and concerns. Res. J. Environ. Earth Sci. 2009, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  3. ACS. Arsenic. Available online: http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancercauses/othercarcinogens/ intheworkplace/arsenic (accessed on 13 June 2013).
  4. IARC. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk to Humans: Arsenic and Arsenic Compounds (Group I). Available online: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/PDFs/ (accessed on 1 May 2013).
  5. ATSDR. Toxicological Profile for Arsenic (Update). U.S. Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Atlanta, GA, USA. Available online: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp2.pdf (accessed on 2 April 2013).
  6. Basu, A.; Mahata, J.; Gupta, S.; Giri, A.K. Genetic toxicology of a paradoxical human carcinogen, arsenic: A review. Mutat. Res. 2001, 488, 171–194. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mandal, K.B.; Suzuki, T.K. Arsenic round the world. Talanta 2002, 58, 201–235. [Google Scholar]
  8. US Department of Health and Human Services. Center for Disease Control. Occupational Safety and Health. Guideline for Inorganic Arsenic and Its Compounds (as As) Potential Human Carcinogen. Available online: www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/81-123/pdfs/0038.pdf (accessed on 20 June 2013).
  9. Smith, A.H.; Smith, M.M.H. Arsenic drinking water regulations in developing countries with extensive exposure. Toxicology 2004, 198, 39–44. [Google Scholar]
  10. NRC. Arsenic in Drinking Water. Available online: www.nap.edu/books/0309063337/html (accessed on 20 May 2013).
  11. NRC. Arsenic in Drinking Water. (2001 Update). Available online: www.nap.edu/books/0309063337/html (accessed on 20 May 2013).
  12. Smith, A.H.; Hopenhayn-Rich, C.; Bates, M.N.; Goeden, H.M.; Hertz-Picciotto, I.; Duggan, H.M.; Wood, R.; Kosnett, M.J.; Smith, M.T. Cancer risks from arsenic in drinking water. Environ. Health Perspect. 1992, 97, 259–267. [Google Scholar]
  13. Abernathy, C.O.; Liu, Y.P.; Longfellow, D.; Aposhian, H.V.; Beck, B.; Fowler, B.; Goyer, R.; Menzer, R.; Rossman, T.; Thompson, C.; Waalkes, M. Arsenic: Health effects, mechanisms of actions and research issues. Environ. Health Perspect. 1999, 107, 593–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. IARC. Arsenic and Arsenic Compounds. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Hum 100C:41–93. Available online: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol100C/mono100C-6.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2013).
  15. Kurttio, P.; Pukkala, E.; Kahelin, H.; Auvinen, A.; Pekkanen, J. Arsenic concentrations in well water and risk of bladder and kidney cancer in Finland. Environ. Health Perspect. 1999, 107, 705–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Treas, J.; Tyagi, T.; Singh, K.P. Chronic exposure to arsenic, estrogen, and their combination causes increased growth and transformation in human prostate epithelial cells potentially by hypermethylation-mediated silencing of MLH1. Prostate 2013, 73, 1660–1672. [Google Scholar]
  17. Li, X.; Li, B.; Xi, S.; Zheng, Q.; Lv, X.; Sun, G. Prolonged environmental exposure of arsenic trioxide through drinking water on the risk of hypertension and type 2 diabetes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2013, 20, 8151–8161. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tseng, C.H. Blackfoot disease and arsenic: A never-ending story. J. Environ. Sci. Health C Environ. Carcinog. Ecotoxicol. Rev. 2005, 23, 55–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Douer, D.; Tallman, M.S. Arsenic trioxide: New clinical experience with an old medication in hematologic malignancies. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005, 23, 2396–2410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lily, L.; Mohassel, L. Arsenic trioxide as first-line treatment for acute promyelocytic leukemia. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 2009, 66, 1913–1918. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang, T.D.; Chen, G.Q.; Chen, S.J.; Chen, Z. Arsenic trioxide, a therapeutic agent for APL. Oncogene 2001, 20, 7146–7153. [Google Scholar]
  22. Antman, K. Introduction: The history of arsenic trioxide in cancer therapy. Oncologist 2001, 6, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abernathy, O.C.; Thomas, J.D.; Calderon, L.R. Health effects and risk assessment of arsenic. J. Nutr. 2003, 133 (Suppl 1), S156–S158. [Google Scholar]
  24. Nachman, K.E.; Baron, P.A.; Raber, G.; Francesconi, K.A.; Navas-Acien, A.; Love, D.C. Roxarsone, inorganic arsenic, and other arsenic species in chicken: A U.S.-based market basket sample. Environ. Health Perspect. 2013. Available online: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013 /05/130513095030.htm (accessed on 29 July 2013). [Google Scholar]
  25. Silbergeld, E.K.; Nachman, K. The environmental and public health risks associated with arsenical use in animal feeds. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2008, 1140, 346–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Makris, K.C.; Quazi, S.; Punamiya, P.; Sarkar, D.; Datta, R. Fate of arsenic in swine waste from concentrated animal feeding operations. J. Environ. Qual. 2008, 37, 1626–1633. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lu, M.; Levin, J.; Sulpice, E.; Sequeira-Le Grand, A.; Alemany, M.; Caen, J.P.; Han, Z.C. Effect of arsenic trioxide on viability, proliferation, and apoptosis in human megakaryocytic leukemia cell lines. Exp. Hematol. 1999, 27, 845–852. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chow, S.K.; Chan, J.Y.; Fung, K.P. Suppression of cell proliferation and regulation of estrogen receptor alpha signaling pathway by arsenic trioxide on human breast cancer MCF-7 cells. J. Endocrinol. 2004, 182, 325–337. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kitchin, K.T. Recent advances in arsenic carcinogenesis: Modes of action, animal model systems, and methylated arsenic metabolites. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2001, 172, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guillamet, E.; Creus, A.; Ponti, J.; Sabbioni, E.; Fortaner, S.; Marcos, R. In vitro DNA damage by arsenic compounds in a human lymphoblastoid cell line (TK6) assessed by the alkaline Comet assay. Mutagenesis 2004, 19, 129–135. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ratnaike, N.R. Acute and chronic arsenic toxicity. Postgrad. Med. J. 2003, 79, 391–396. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lui, S.; Davidson, M.; Tang, X.; Walker, W.; Athar, M.; Ivanov, V.; Hei, T. Mitochondial damage mediates genotoxicity of arsenic in mammalian cells. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 3236–3242. [Google Scholar]
  33. Alarifi, S.; Ali, D.; Alkahtani, S.; Siddiqui, M.A.; Ali, B.A. Arsenic trioxide-mediated oxidative stress and genotoxicity in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Onco. Targets Ther. 2013, 6, 75–84. [Google Scholar]
  34. Yedjou, C.G.; Tchouwou, P.B. In-vitro cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of arsenic trioxide on human leukemia (HL-60) cells using the MTT and alkaline single cell electrophoresis (comet) assays. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2007, 301, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Graham-Evans, B.; Cohly, H.H.P.; Yu, H.; Tchounwou, P.B. Arsenic trioxide-induced genotoxic and cytotoxic effects in human keratinocytes, melanocytes and dendritic cells. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2004, 1, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hughes, M.F. Arsenic toxicity and potential mechanisms of action. Toxicol. Lett. 2002, 133, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Udensi, U.K.; Graham-Evans, B.E.; Rogers, C.S.; Isokpehi, R.D. Cytotoxicity patterns of arsenic trioxide exposure on HaCaT keratinocytes. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2011, 4, 183–190. [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang, Z.G.; Rivi, R.; Delva, L.; König, A.; Scheinberg, D.A.; Gambacorti-Passerini, C.; Gabrilove, J.L.; Warrell, R.P.; Pandolfi, P.P. Arsenic trioxide and melarsoprol induce programmed cell death in myeloid leukemia cell lines and function in a PML and PML-RARalpha independent manner. Blood 1998, 92, 1497–1504. [Google Scholar]
  39. Jing, Y.; Dai, J.; Chalmers-Redman, R.M.; Tatton, W.G.; Waxman, S. Arsenic trioxide selectively induces acute promyelocytic leukemia cell apoptosis via a hydrogen peroxide-dependent pathway. Blood 1999, 94, 2102–2111. [Google Scholar]
  40. Park, W.H.; Seol, J.G.; Kim, E.S.; Hyun, J.M.; Jung, C.W.; Lee, C.C.; Kim, B.K.; Lee, Y.Y. Arsenic trioxide-mediated growth inhibition in MC/CAR myeloma cells via cell cycle arrest in association with induction of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p21, and apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 3065–3071. [Google Scholar]
  41. Mahieux, R.; Pise-Masison, C.; Gessain, A.; Brady, J.N.; Olivier, R.; Perret, E.; Misteli, T.; Nicot, C. Arsenic trioxide induces apoptosis in human T-cell leukemia virus type 1- and type 2-infected cells by a caspase-3-dependent mechanism involving Bcl-2 cleavage. Blood 2001, 98, 3762–3769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Colognato, R.; Coppedè, F.; Ponti, J.; Sabbioni, E.; Migliore, L. Genotoxicity induced by arsenic compounds in peripheral human lymphocytes analysed by cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay. Mutagenesis 2007, 22, 255–261. [Google Scholar]
  43. Dopp, E.; Hartmann, L.M.; Florea, A.M.; von Recklinghausen, U.; Pieper, R.; Shokouhi, B.; Rettenmeier, A.W.; Hirner, A.V.; Obe, G. Uptake of inorganic and organic derivatives of arsenic trioxide associated with induced cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2004, 201, 156–165. [Google Scholar]
  44. Okita, K.; Ichisaka, T.; Yamanaka, S. Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2007, 448, 313–317. [Google Scholar]
  45. What are Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells? Stem Cell Information; National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Bethesda, MD, USA. Available online: stemcells.nih.gov/ (accessed on 23 July 2013).
  46. Yee, J. Turning somatic cells into pluripotent stem cells. Nature Educ. 2010, 3, 25. [Google Scholar]
  47. Yu1, J.; Vodyanik, A.M.; Smuga-Otto, K.; Antosiewicz-Bourget, J.; Franel, L.J.; Tian, S.; Nie, J.; Jonsdottir, A.G.; Ruotti, V.; Stewart, R.; Slukvin, I.I.; Thomson, A.J. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 2007, 318, 1917–1920. [Google Scholar]
  48. The Promise of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (IPS). In Stem Cell Information; National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Bethesda, MD, USA. Available online: stemcells.nih.gov/ (accessed on 23 July 2013).
  49. Zhou, H.; Ding, S. Evolution of induced pluripotent stem cell technology. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2010, 17, 276–280. [Google Scholar]
  50. Egashira, T.; Yuasa, S.; Fukuda, K. Novel insights into disease modeling using induced pluripotent stem cells. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2013, 36, 182–188. [Google Scholar]
  51. Sommer, C.A.; Mostoslavsky, G. The evolving field of induced pluripotency: Recent progress and future challenges. J. Cell Physiol. 2013, 228, 267–275. [Google Scholar]
  52. Inoue, H.; Yamanaka, S. The use of induced pluripotent stem cells in drug development. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2011, 89, 655–661. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kiskinis, E.M.; Eggan, K. Progress toward the clinical application of patient-specific pluripotent stem cells. J. Clin. Invest. 2010, 120, 51–59. [Google Scholar]
  54. Shen, Z.Y.; Shen, J.; Li, Q.S.; Chen, C.Y.; Chen, J.Y.; Yi, Z. Morphological and functional changes of mitochondria in apoptotic esophageal carcinoma cells induced by arsenic trioxide. World J. Gastroenterol. 2002, 8, 31–35. [Google Scholar]
  55. Shen, Z.; Shen, J.; Chen, M.; Li, Q.; Hong, C. Morphological changes of mitochondria in apoptosis of esophageal carcinoma cells induced by As2O3. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi 2000, 29, 200–203. [Google Scholar]
  56. Subbarayan, P.R.; Lee, K.; Ardalan, B. Arsenic trioxide suppresses thymidylate synthase in 5-FU-resistant colorectal cancer cell line HT29. In Vitro re-sensitizing cells to 5-FU. Anticancer Res. 2010, 30, 1157–1162. [Google Scholar]
  57. Yeh, J.Y.; Cheng, L.C.; Liang, Y.C.; Ou, B.R. Modulation of the arsenic effects on cytotoxicity, viability, and cell cycle in porcine endothelial cells by selenium. Endothelium 2003, 10, 127–139. [Google Scholar]
  58. Yedjou, C.G.; Tchounwou, P.B. Oxidative stress in human leukemia (HL-60), human liver carcinoma (HepG2), and human Jurkat-T cells exposed to arsenic trioxide. Metal Ions Biol. Med. 2006, 9, 293–297. [Google Scholar]
  59. Walker, A.M.; Stevens, J.J.; Ndebele, K.; Tchounwou, P.B. Arsenic trioxide modulates DNA synthesis and apoptosis in lung carcinoma cells. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 1996–2007. [Google Scholar]
  60. Shen, Z.Y.; Shen, J.; Cai, W.J.; Hong, C.; Zheng, M.H. The alteration of mitochondria is an early event of arsenic trioxide induced apoptosis in esophageal carcinoma cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2000, 5, 155–158. [Google Scholar]
  61. Nakamura, S.; Nagano, S.; Nagao, H.; Ishidou, Y.; Yokouchi, M.; Abematsu, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Komiya, S.; Setoguchi, T. Arsenic trioxide prevents osteosarcoma growth by inhibition of GLI transcription via DNA damage accumulation. PLoS One 2013, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Soignet, S.L; Maslak, P.; Wang, Z.G.; Jhanwar, S.; Calleja, E.; Dardashti, L.J.; Corso, D.; DeBlasio, A.; Gabrilove, J.; Scheinberg, D.A.; Pandolfi, P.P.; Warrell, R.P., Jr. Complete remission after treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia with arsenic trioxide. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 339, 1341–1348. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Graham, B.; Stevens, J.; Wells, P.; Sims, J.; Rogers, C.; Leggett, S.S.; Ekunwe, S.; Ndebele, K. Enhancement of Arsenic Trioxide-Mediated Changes in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (IPS). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 7524-7536. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110707524

AMA Style

Graham B, Stevens J, Wells P, Sims J, Rogers C, Leggett SS, Ekunwe S, Ndebele K. Enhancement of Arsenic Trioxide-Mediated Changes in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (IPS). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2014; 11(7):7524-7536. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110707524

Chicago/Turabian Style

Graham, Barbara, Jacqueline Stevens, Phatia Wells, Jennifer Sims, Christian Rogers, Sophia S. Leggett, Stephen Ekunwe, and Kenneth Ndebele. 2014. "Enhancement of Arsenic Trioxide-Mediated Changes in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (IPS)" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11, no. 7: 7524-7536. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110707524

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop