Next Article in Journal
Effects of Weight Loss on Advanced Glycation End Products in Subjects with and without Diabetes: A Preliminary Report
Previous Article in Journal
Same Abbreviated Injury Scale Values May Be Associated with Different Risks to Mortality in Trauma Patients: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study Based on the Trauma Registry System in a Level I Trauma Center
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 14
Issue 12
10.3390/ijerph14121549
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Practicing Dentists’ Self-Efficacy and Associated Factors in Managing the Treatment of Adults with Mental and Physical Disabilities: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

by
Sakher AlQahtani
1,
Ebtissam Zakaria Murshid
1,
Hani Talal Fadel
2 and
Saba Kassim
2,*
1
Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Taibah University Dental College & Hospital, Al-Madinah Al-Munawwrah 42353, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14(12), 1549; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121549
Submission received: 21 September 2017 / Revised: 25 November 2017 / Accepted: 5 December 2017 / Published: 11 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Occupational Safety and Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Provision of oral healthcare to adults with mental and physical disabilities (AMPD) remains a challenging area across various healthcare systems. The present study aimed to assess self-reported efficacy and investigate factors associated with self-efficacy in the management of AMPD among practicing dentists in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A pilot-tested, self-administered questionnaire was distributed to a convenience sample of 1000 dentists. Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed on the collected responses. Results: Among the respondents (54%), 43% were males. Only 14% described their self-efficacy in managing AMPD as “High”. Multivariable regression analyses revealed significant associations between “High” self-efficacy and male gender (Odd ratio (OR) = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.16–4.89), experience practicing dentistry for 11 years or more (OR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.04–4.47), specialization in pediatric dentistry (OR = 3.98, 95% CI = 1.31–12.07), previous experience in managing AMPD (OR = 4.23, 95% CI = 1.59–11.22), and awareness of regulations for managing AMPD (OR = 2.62, 95% CI = 1.42–4.38). The interaction of gender x age was significantly associated (p = 0.028) with “High” self-efficacy. Gender-stratified analyses revealed a significant association between age and “High” self-efficacy among male dentists only. Conclusions: The findings of the present study highlight that a large percentage of dentists reported “Low/Moderate” self-efficacy in managing AMPD, particularly among female dentists. However, further studies are required to verify the factors associated with self-efficacy in the present study, and to identify other factors that may influence self-efficacy in managing AMPD.

1. Introduction

Adults and children with mental and/or physical disabilities (MPD) face challenges in accessing oral healthcare: lack of resources and trained personnel are among the main challenges. Saudi Arabia’s Disability Law, issued by the Royal Decree approving the Council of Ministers’ decision number 224 in 2000, defines a person with a disability as “one who is totally or partially disabled with respect to his/her bodily, material, mental, communicative, academic, or psychological capabilities, to the extent that it compromises the ability of that person to meet his/her normal needs as compared to his/her non-disabled counterparts” [1]. Intellectual disability refers to significant limitations in intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior as expressed in practical, social, and conceptual skills originating before the age of 18 [2]. However, the term “mental retardation” has been commonly used to describe a cluster of syndromes and disorders characterized by low intelligence and associated limitations in adaptive behavior [3]. It is worth mentioning that certain misconceptions exist in the understanding of such similar yet non-synonymous terms.
The incidence of oral disease is significantly higher among children and adults with MPD than among patients without MPD [3,4,5], primarily due to compromised access to the oral healthcare system, which ultimately results in insufficient treatment and difficulty maintaining good oral hygiene, inferior overall health, and a lower quality of life [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. The absence of special-care dental facilities and the shortage of dentists trained in managing patients with MPD have been highlighted by patients and their caregivers as some of the most important factors influencing these aforementioned poor oral health outcomes [13,14,15]. Moreover, many dentists avoid treating patients with MPD because they perceive themselves as being incapable of managing their needs and lack the confidence to attempt treatment [16,17].
Bandura [18] defined self-efficacy as “belief in one’s capability to organize and execute the course of action required to produce and give attainments.” There are several contextual factors (behavioral, environmental, and personal) associated with self-efficacy [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]; however, few studies have examined the factors associated with self-efficacy in managing oral health treatment of adults with mental and physical disabilities (AMPD). Some studies have reported associations among levels of ability, comfort, and self-efficacy with regard to the management of patients with MPD in undergraduate dental students. Furthermore, these studies suggested that dental students who underwent further training were willing to provide care to patients with MPD in the future, and that their self-efficacy in doing so was irrespective of their age, gender, or previous experience [16,26,27].
Although the management of AMPD is a standard component of the curriculum in accredited dental institutions in Saudi Arabia [28], this area of dentistry remain a neglected and largely unrecognized specialty and has not received full attention during undergraduate or postgraduate dental education [28]. Ensuring self-efficacy is a key component of helping oral health care providers to manage these patients and involving them in the health care pathway [28]. Specifically, in Saudi Arabia, the number of patients who require special care, such as AMPD is rapidly increasing owing to improvements in the health care system and the availability of palliative medicine, which have contributed to increases in life expectancy and the number of people living with chronic health conditions [28]. At the individual level, maintaining good oral health is paramount owing to its positive effects on self-esteem, general health, patient satisfaction, and quality of life for AMPD [28,29]. However, at the community level, helping these people is a moral and international responsibility [28]. In a recent meeting of the National Society for Human Rights [30], Saudi Arabia declared its effort to establish and align with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Specifically, it was emphasized that no society could be completed or developed sustainably without guaranteeing the rights of people with disability and ensuring their equal participation in all economic, social, political and cultural aspects of society [28].
However, no studies have examined the self-efficacy of practicing dentists in the provision of oral healthcare to AMPD in Saudi Arabia, and the effects of gender and age on self-efficacy in the management of AMPD within certain contexts (e.g., culture, training, workplace environment, work regulations) remain to be determined.
Thus, the present study aimed to assess self-reported self-efficacy and investigate factors associated with self-efficacy in the management of AMPD among practicing dentists in Riyadh/Saudi Arabia. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference in the self-efficacy of practicing dentists in managing AMPD based on age, gender, or contextual factors.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design, Setting and Participants’ Recruitment

The present cross-sectional study was conducted between September 2015 and January 2016, with a convenience sample from the capital city of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The sample included dentists with various areas of specialization who were proficient in English and eligible for practice in Saudi Arabia (i.e., officially registered at the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, as the licensing examinations are solely conducted in English). The monthly meeting of the Saudi Dental Society (SDS) was the setting during the aforementioned period, at which various topics are covered with the aim of updating the general knowledge of dentists in the region.

2.2. Data Collection and Measures

An anonymous, self-administered questionnaire (available on request) was used to collect the data. The questionnaire consisted of 21 closed-ended, multiple-choice questions and was based on current literature [31]. The questionnaire covered information regarding dentists’ self-efficacy and motivation to undergo special training regarding the treatment of AMPD, their experience in treating AMPD, and their interest in managing AMPD individually or as part of a specialized team. Additional questions focused on awareness of regulations that govern the management of AMPD; demographic information such as age, gender; educational level; origin of dental degree; current professional rank; specialty; area of practice; and years of experience. The definition of physical and mental disabilities was left open to include all types of physical or mental disabilities. Notably, the current literature emphasizes that disability represents a continuum that may include geriatric and medically comprised patients [31]. The questionnaire was pilot-tested among 30 faculty members from the College of Dentistry at King Saud University (KSU) in Riyadh, who were selected using simple randomization and did not participate in the main study. The questionnaire was distributed by hand, and feedback regarding the language and clarity of questions was obtained from all participants. The questionnaire was then revised in accordance with the comments of pilot-study participants prior to distribution to the main study sample. Formal permission was obtained from the SDS to collect the data. A trained research assistant was assigned to distribute and collect the questionnaires (N = 1000) and clarify any ambiguity in the questions during the study period.

2.3. Ethical Considerations

The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the College of Dentistry Research Center (CDRC# FR 0258) at KSU and conducted in accordance with the principles outlined by the World Medical Association in the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their participation in the study.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics were used to report sample characteristics. Categorical variables were reported as counts and percentages, following which they were dichotomized to simplify the analysis and interpretation of results, particularly for categories with relatively fewer cases. The dependent variable “self-efficacy” was operationalized as follows: “Please rate your level of qualification, capability, or confidence in managing treatment of AMPD.” Responses were categorized into three groups (Low, Moderate, and High). As the “Moderate” category may infer a level of uncertainty in the participating dentist’s response, responses for the dependent variable “self-efficacy” were dichotomized as follows: “Low/Moderate” and “High”. This dichotomization enabled us to identify participating dentists who were confident enough to place themselves within the “High” category.
Bivariate chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to explore the associations between the dependent variable and the background characteristics of participating dentists (age, gender, highest degree, origin of degree, professional rank, specialty, area of practice, years of experience, place of practice, attendance at workshops regarding the management of AMPD, and adherence to special rules for management of AMPD), as well as factors related to self-efficacy (behavior, affective state, and actions). The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05. Multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify potentially significant explanatory factors associated with the dependent variable. The results of these analyses were reported as odds ratios (OR), along with significance levels and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The main and interaction effects of age and gender on self-efficacy were examined using this model. Gender-stratified analyses were performed to examine the effect of age on self-efficacy in each gender group. No a priori sample size was calculated for the present study; however, post hoc sample calculation revealed sufficient power for performing logistic regression modelling (R2 = 0.31, predictors = 11, p ≤ 0.05; observed statistical power = 1.00).

3. Results

3.1. Sample Characteristics

Among the 1000 distributed questionnaires, 536 were returned (response rate = 54%). Thirteen questionnaires were discarded due to incomplete data. The final sample included 523 respondents of whom 43% were males. Respondents included 100 consultants (19.1%), 129 specialists (24.7%), 86 residents in different specialties (16.4%), 103 general practitioners (19.7%), 98 interns (18.7%), and seven individuals who did not report their rank (1.3%). Pediatric dentists accounted for 18 respondents (3.5%). Table 1 shows the general characteristics of the responding dentists as a whole and within each gender.

3.2. Descriptive Analyses of Training, Interest, Attitude, Experiences, and Self-Efficacy in Managing AMPD

Table 2 shows that only 18.4% of respondents had ever attended a continuing education workshop regarding the management of AMPD, although 74.1% reported an interest in attending such workshops in the future. Of the respondents, 73.1% reported an interest in managing adults with physical disabilities. However, a lower percentage of respondents reported an interest in managing adults with mental disabilities. Over half (58.9%) of respondents reported attempting to treat AMPD, while 53.9% reported positive experiences in doing so in the past. Only 14.2% of the respondents described their self-efficacy in managing AMPD as “High”. Availability of rules and regulations governing the management of AMPD in the workplace was reported by only 31.9% of respondents.
Of the 330 dentists with experience treating AMPD, 79.9% managed to complete treatment for their patients, which was either in regular clinic settings (44.2%), with help of another specialist (21.2%), under sedation with nitrous oxide (3.9%), under other forms of sedation (0.6%), or under general anesthesia (10.0%). Of those who did not complete treatment, reported barriers included the patient’s lack of cooperation (6.7%), being unfamiliar with the patient’s health condition (1.5%), absence of appropriate facilities (5.5%), and lack of a multispecialty team in the clinic (6.4%). There was notable heterogeneity in opinions regarding who should provide oral healthcare for AMPD (Figure 1). A total of 47.8% (N = 250) participants believed that such care should be provided by an individual “specialized in AMPD dentistry”, while 38.8% (N = 203) believed that such care should be provided by “a special team of dentists with multiple specialties”. However, the majority of respondents (86.6%, N = 454) agreed that each clinic should employ either a specialist or a special team trained to manage AMPD.
More than half of respondents reported that they would be interested in being part of a team that manages AMPD, while 25.9% reported that their interest would depend on the other dentists included in the team and the facilities available (Figure 2).

3.3. Bivariate Analyses of Factors Associated with Self-Efficacy in Managing AMPD

Bivariate analyses revealed statistically significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) in levels of self-efficacy with regard to socio-demographic and contextual factors including age, level of education, and awareness of regulations and rules for managing AMPD (Table 3). However, other variables such as practicing in a private or governmental clinic or in educational institutes were not significantly associated with “High” self-efficacy in treating AMPD (p > 0.05).

3.4. Multivariable Logistic Regression Analyses of Factors Associated with Self-Efficacy in Managing AMPD

Following multivariable logistic regression analyses (Table 4), factors significantly associated with “High” self-efficacy in managing AMPD included male gender, experience practicing dentistry for 11 years or more, holding a specialty in pediatric dentistry, previous experience in managing AMPD, and awareness of regulations governing AMPD management. The most significant association was observed for “previous experience in managing treatment of AMPD”. The amount of variance captured by the model ranged from 17% to 30% (Table 4). A significant interaction effect was also observed for age and gender (Table 4). When the data analyses were stratified by gender, a significant effect of age on self-efficacy was observed only for male participants, but not for female participants. Men ≥46 years of age were 4.62 (95% CI = 2.09–10.21, p = 0.0001) times more likely to regard their self-efficacy in managing AMPD as “High” than their younger counterparts (51.6% for dentists ≥46 years versus 18.8% for dentists ≤45 years).

4. Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to assess and examine factors associated with self-reported self-efficacy in the management of AMPD among practicing dentists in Riyadh, KSA. According to Jones et al., self-efficacy represents a construct that with appropriate intervention, skill, and environmental support—is amenable to improvement [32]. The findings of the present study highlighted that only a small number of dentists reported “High” self-efficacy in managing AMPD. Moreover, pediatric dentists were approximately four times more likely to report “High” self-efficacy in managing AMPD than those with other areas of specialization. This finding may be attributable to the nature of training within pediatric dentistry programs, since residents are often acquainted with strategies for managing behavior, establishing communication, and handling uncontrolled patient movements [33]. However, pediatric dentists are not always able to meet the potentially complex restorative or rehabilitation treatment needs of AMPD [33]. This finding is supported by the heterogeneity in responses regarding who should provide care to AMPD in the present study.
Our findings are in contrast to those of Watters et al. from the USA, who reported that age and gender had no impact on self-efficacy [16]. Notably, both studies were conducted in different contexts, as the latter was conducted among students training in close to “ideal-world” circumstances. In the current study, respondents recalled experiences in “real-world” daily practice, in which managing AMPD was perceived as a challenge mostly associated with low self-efficacy, particularly among female dentists. Moreover, our findings indicate that gender differences may have had an impact on the decision to pursue postgraduate education and specialized training regarding the management of AMPD. Studies in Saudi Arabia have suggested that female dental students were more interested in pediatric dentistry as a future dental specialty than male students [34]. Consequently, one can expect that female dentists would be more likely to report “High” self-efficacy in managing AMPD than their male counterparts, as pediatric dentistry allows individuals to gain more experience in managing patients with special needs. However, only 15% of the 545 women surveyed went on to specialize in pediatric dentistry [35]. Studies have suggested that barriers against pursuing postgraduate dental education among women include family commitments and cultural stigma [36,37]. In the present study, the number of participating pediatric dentists was relatively low (11 women and 7 men), limiting our ability to determine significant differences in responses between males and females in this group. Nevertheless, the present study is the first to directly investigate levels of personal confidence, capability, and qualifications for specifically managing AMPD in Saudi Arabia [28], which may have contributed to lower reported levels of self-efficacy in managing AMPD. Factors that hinder and promote self-efficacy among female dentists in managing AMPD should be addressed using both quantitative and qualitative methods in future studies.
As older age tends to be associated with greater levels of experience and exposure to a larger variety of cases, older dentists may be more likely to report relatively higher levels of self-efficacy than their younger counterparts. In a study involving 127 undergraduate dental students, the addition of more focused clinical experience involving children with MPD led to increases in self-efficacy in managing such patients [16]. However, age per se was not significantly associated with self-efficacy in this previous study [16], and the true impact of age on self-efficacy remains questionable due to increasing incorporation of clinical experience in dental curricula.
Few respondents reported attending continuing education training or awareness regarding regulations for managing AMPD in the present study, even though the literature specifies that these two factors are essential for improving self-efficacy of dental care professionals with regard to the management of AMPD [38,39,40]. These findings may be attributable to the difficulty in finding high-quality continuing education programs in a highly specific area of specialization such as the management of AMPD. The Statute of the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS) mandates that both private and government sectors provide continuing education to practitioners [35]. Thus, clinicians are often reliant on their workplace to provide updates regarding regulations and practice guidelines rather than their personal efforts to do so. In the present study, availability of rules and regulations governing the management of AMPD was reported by only 31.9% (36.5% for government sectors versus 29% for private sectors, p = 0.085) of respondents. Our findings were in accordance with those of a previous study involving 230 dentists and physicians in Riyadh, of which only 39% reported personal awareness and use of evidence-based practice guidelines in their daily practice [41].
The present study possesses some limitations of note, such as response bias (rate = 54%) due to the use of a single method for data collection. However, using a self-administered questionnaire minimized the impact of social desirability and interviewer bias [42] (i.e., the participants’ answers were more likely to be genuine). Moreover, the questionnaire was pilot-tested, allowing for selective modification where needed prior to the actual investigation. Nevertheless, future research should consider a combination of methods for quantitative data collection, such as emails and telephone calls [16]. In addition, we did not examine the test/re-test reliability or objective validity of the questionnaire, and the questionnaire may not have captured all aspects of self-efficacy in managing AMPD. However, in the absence of a relevant, validated instrument, items from current relevant literature were adopted in an attempt to minimize such shortcomings. Due to the cross-sectional design, we were also unable to assess causality, although we consider causality assessments to be beyond the scope of the present study. Recruitment of a convenience sample using the SDS meeting as the study setting may also limit the generalizability of our findings to all practicing dentists in Riyadh. However, the feasibility of data collection should be considered alongside the fact that the diversity of the sample may not be proportionate to that of general samples. We believe that our methods partially addressed this limitation in the absence of a viable, alternative framework for recruitment [43].
Our analysis further revealed factors that were common among dentists with “Low/Moderate” self-efficacy. Future research should aim to elucidate specific factors that hinder self-efficacy for both dentists with “Low” and “Moderate” self-efficacy. Such research may aid in the education and training of dentists with “Low” self-efficacy, while simultaneously enhancing and optimizing the self-efficacy of dentists reporting “Moderate” self-efficacy. The era of patient empowerment dictates that health care providers should demonstrate optimum self-efficacy [44].
It is well acknowledged in the literature that efficacy beliefs are multi-faceted, and knowledge of the activity domain specifies which aspects of personal efficacy should be measured. The present study was an exploratory investigation that aimed to shed light on the self-efficacy of dental practitioners in managing treatment of AMPD during their attendance at the SDS meeting. Therefore, in such a situation, the use of a single item rather than a lengthy questionnaire is desirable [45]. Future research should consider the validity and reliability of this single item against full-scale assessments of self-efficacy in the management of AMPD. Finally, respondents of the present study may have interpreted “mental disability” in different ways. While some may have considered intellectual disabilities, others may have considered cognitive disabilities (like dementia) or mental health disorders (such as depression, anxiety, or schizophrenia). As previously mentioned, such misconceptions may exist when interpreting similar yet non-synonymous terms. Likewise, physical disability may have been interpreted differently among respondents.
The implications of the present study are multi-faceted as well: We aimed to direct the attention of health-governing bodies in Saudi Arabia to the current situation in a neglected area of dentistry, and to highlight important aspects that may currently affect the provision of oral healthcare to AMPD by practicing dentists. A low proportion of dentists (23% of men and 7% of women in the present study) reported “High” self-efficacy in managing AMPD. Dentists must be generally motivated to enhance their self-efficacy in managing AMPD, with an overall goal of mastering such treatment. Having access to hands-on training either during undergraduate training or postgraduate workshops and succeeding in those experiences should enhance the belief in one’s own abilities and feelings of self-efficacy. However, failure in such settings would undermine self-efficacy, especially if such failures occur before self-efficacy has been firmly established. A resilient sense of efficacy requires experience in overcoming obstacles through perseverant effort. After dentists become convinced they have what it takes to succeed, they persevere in the face of adversity and quickly rebound from setbacks. Another way to increase self-efficacy is through experiences using social models. Observing other dentists manage patients with AMPD increases the observers’ confidence that they too can successfully manage such patients [18].
Additionally, it is critical that regulations governing the treatment of AMPD be adapted to the Saudi Disability Law, which in turn has been emphasized by the Saudi Human Rights Council [46] but has yet to be fully realized. Oral health institutes should be aware of these regulations and ensure that their oral healthcare providers are sufficiently knowledgeable regarding all relevant regulations. Institutes are also expected to provide sufficient support for their workers by means of continuing education and training and by establishing focused mentoring programs, ultimately aiding in the improvement of their self-efficacy. Lastly, dental schools should reconsider their curricula to incorporate more effective and central components regarding the management of AMPD, as such training will exert a great impact on the self-efficacy of future dentists in providing oral healthcare to patients with disabilities [27,47].

5. Conclusions

Despite the limitations of the present study and the fact that our sample is not representative of all dental practitioners, our findings indicated that a large percentage of dentists reported “Low/Moderate” self-efficacy in managing AMPD. Among the factors associated with “Low/Moderate” self-efficacy were gender, years of dental experience, experience in managing AMPD, specialty, and awareness of rules for treating AMPD. As the present study was exploratory in nature, future research should aim to develop a conceptual framework that may aid in elucidating the factors that influence self-efficacy in providing oral healthcare to AMPD in various contexts.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the SDS for permitting questionnaire distribution and collection during the monthly scientific meeting and Mohammed Aldhubaiban, Assistant Professor in King Saud University, for conducting the pilot study.

Author Contributions

Ebtissam Zakaria Murshid and Sakher AlQahtani conceived and designed the study. Saba Kassim and Hani Talal Fadel undertook literature review, interpretation of the results and wrote the original draft of the manuscript. Saba Kassim and Sakher AlQahtani undertook data analysis and interpretation the results. Ebtissam Zakaria Murshid and Sakher AlQahtani Saba Kassim and Hani Talal Fadel critically commented on the draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Disability Law. M/37. R. Decree. 244. Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers: Saudi Arabia. Available online: https://boe.gov.sa (accessed on 28 August 2016).
  2. Schalock, R.L.; Borthwick-Duffy, S.A.; Bradley, V.J.; Buntinx, W.H.E.; Coulter, D.L.; Craig, E.M.; Gomez, S.C.; Lachapelle, Y.; Luckasson, R.; Reeve, A. Intellectual Disability: Definition, Classification, and Systems of Supports. Available online: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED509596–2010 (accessed on 28 August 2017).
  3. WHO (World Health Organization). The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. Available online: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&continue=/scholar%3Fq%3DThe%2BICD-10%2Bclassification%2Bof%2Bmental%2Band%2Bbehavioural%2Bdisorders:%2Bclinical%2Bdescriptions%2Band%2Bdiagnostic%2Bguidelines%26hl%3Den%26as_sdt%3D0,5&citilm=1&citation_for_view=oFDmaucAAAAJ:zYLM7Y9cAGgC&hl=en&oi=saved-1992 (accessed on 28 August 2016).
  4. Anders, P.L.; Davis, E.L. Oral health of patients with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Spec. Care Dent. 2010, 30, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Waldman, H.B.; Perlman, S.P. Disability and rehabilitation: Do we ever think about needed dental care? A case study: The USA. Disabil. Rehabil. 2010, 32, 947–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chen, C.Y.; Chen, Y.W.; Tsai, T.P.; Shih, W.Y. Oral health status of children with special health care needs receiving dental treatment under general anesthesia at the dental clinic of Taipei Veterans General Hospital in Taiwan. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2014, 77, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Daly, B.; Smith, K. Promoting good dental health in older people: Role of the community nurse. Br. J. Community Nurs. 2015, 20, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Perusini, D.J.; Llacuachaqui, M.; Sigal, M.J.; Dempster, L.J. Dental Students’ Clinical Expectations and Experiences Treating Persons with Disabilities. J. Dent. Educ. 2016, 80, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Murshid, E.Z. Oral health status, dental needs, habits and behavioral attitude towards dental treatment of a group of autistic children in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent. J. 2005, 17, 132–139. [Google Scholar]
  10. Al-Hussyeen, A. Child’s dental visits, oral health, knowledge and source of dental information among mothers of children with Down’s Syndrome in Riyadh. Saudi Dent. J. 2006, 18, 8–17. [Google Scholar]
  11. Brennan, D.S.; Spencer, A.J.; Roberts-Thomson, K.F. Tooth loss, chewing ability and quality of life. Qual. Life Res. 2008, 17, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Nelson, L.P.; Getzin, A.; Graham, D.; Zhou, J.; Wagle, E.M.; McQuiston, J.; McLaughlin, S.; Govind, A.; Sadof, M.; Huntington, N.L. Unmet dental needs and barriers to care for children with significant special health care needs. Pediatr. Dent. 2011, 33, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Williams, J.J.; Spangler, C.C.; Yusaf, N.K. Barriers to dental care access for patients with special needs in an affluent metropolitan community. Spec. Care Dent. 2015, 35, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. AL-Shehri, S.A. Access to dental care for persons with disabilities in Saudi Arabia (Caregivers’ perspective). J. Disabil. Oral Health 2012, 13, 51. [Google Scholar]
  15. Murshid, E.Z. Characteristics and dental experiences of autistic children in Saudi Arabia: Cross-sectional study. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2011, 41, 1629–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Watters, A.L.; Stabulas-Savage, J.; Toppin, J.D.; Janal, M.N.; Robbins, M.R. Incorporating Experiential Learning Techniques to Improve Self-Efficacy in Clinical Special Care Dentistry Education. J. Dent. Educ. 2015, 79, 1016–1023. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Alkahtani, Z.M.; Stark, P.C.; Loo, C.Y.; Wright, W.G.; Morgan, J.P. Saudi and U.S. dental student attitudes toward treating individuals with developmental disabilities. J. Dent. Educ. 2014, 78, 1145–1153. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Bandura, A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control; Freeman: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  19. Buglar, M.E.; White, K.M.; Robinson, N.G. The role of self-efficacy in dental patients’ brushing and flossing: Testing an extended Health Belief Model. Patient Educ. Couns. 2010, 78, 269–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. DiIorio, C.; Shafer, P.O.; Letz, R.; Henry, T.R.; Schomer, D.L.; Yeager, K. Behavioral, social, and affective factors associated with self-efficacy for self-management among people with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2006, 9, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Anderson, S.L.; Betz, N.E. Sources of social self-efficacy expectations: Their measurement and relation to career development. J. Vocat. Behav. 2001, 58, 98–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Al-Abdulwahab, S.S.; Al-Gain, S.I. Attitudes of Saudi Arabian health care professionals towards people with physical disabilities. Asia Pac. Disabil. Rehabil. J. 2003, 14, 63–70. [Google Scholar]
  23. AlSarheed, M.; Bedi, R.; Alkhatib, M.N.; Hunt, N.P. Dentists’ attitudes and practices toward provision of orthodontic treatment for children with visual and hearing impairments. Spec. Care Dent. 2006, 26, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. AlSarheed, M.; Bedi, R.; Hunt, N.P. Attitudes of dentists, working in Riyadh, toward people with a sensory impairment. Spec. Care Dent. 2001, 21, 113–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bandura, A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  26. Thierer, T.; Meyerowitz, C. Education of dentists in the treatment of patients with special needs. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc. 2005, 33, 723–729. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Waldman, B.; Al-Nowaiser, A.; Hamed, M.; Perlman, S. Dentistry for individuals with special needs in Saudi Arabia: A commentary. J. Disabil. Oral Health 2010, 11/2, 57–60. [Google Scholar]
  28. Abed, H. Special Care Dentistry in Saudi Arabia: Development as a Dental Specialty—An Opinion Paper. Available online: http://www.saudident.com/special-care-dentistry-in-saudi-arabia-development-as-a-dental-specialty-an-opinion-paper/ (accessed on 19 September 2017).
  29. Scambler, S.; Low, E.; Zoitopoulos, L.; Gallagher, J.E. Professional attitudes towards disability in special care dentistry. J. Disabil. Oral Health 2011, 12, 51–58. [Google Scholar]
  30. NSHR. The Chairman of the National Society for the Human Rights Participates in the 4th International Conference for Disability andRehabilitation. Available online: http://nshr.org.sa/en/?news=the-chairman-of-the-national-society-for-human-rights-participates-in-the-4th-international-conference-for-disability-and-rehabilitation (accessed on 11 November 2017).
  31. Baumeister, S.E.; Davidson, P.L.; Carreon, D.C.; Nakazono, T.T.; Gutierrez, J.J.; Andersen, R.M. What influences dental students to serve special care patients? Spec. Care Dent. 2007, 27, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jones, K.; Brennan, D.S.; Parker, E.J.; Mills, H.; Jamieson, L. Does self-efficacy mediate the effect of oral health literacy on self-rated oral health in an Indigenous population? J. Public Health Dent. 2016, 76, 350–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Vozza, I.; Cavalle, E.; Corridore, D.; Ripari, F.; Spota, A.; Brugnoletti, O.; Guerra, F. Preventive strategies in oral health for special needs patients. Ann. Stomatol. 2015, 6, 96–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Halawany, H.S. Career motivations, perceptions of the future of dentistry and preferred dental specialties among saudi dental students. Open Dent. J. 2014, 8, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Al-Dlaigan, Y.H.; Albarakati, S.F.; Al-Habeeb, F.; Al-Hulaily, M. Career characteristics and postgraduate education of female dentist graduates of the College of Dentistry at King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent. J. 2012, 24, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nayak, P.P.; Prasad, K.V.; Jyothi, C.; Roopa, G.; Sanga, R. Preferences and barriers for continuing professional development among dental practitioners in the twin cities of Hubli-Dharwad, India. J. Indian Assoc. Public Health Dent. 2015, 13, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rajeh, M.; Nicolau, B.; Pluye, P.; Qutob, A.; Esfandiari, S. Are There Barriers for Professional Development of Women Dentists? A Qualitative Study in Saudi Arabia. JDR Clin. Transl. Res. 2017, 2, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cooper, B.R.; Monson, A.L. Allied restorative functions training in Minnesota: A case study. J. Dent. Educ. 2007, 71, 373–377. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Skapetis, T.; Gerzina, T.; Hu, W. Managing dental emergencies: A descriptive study of the effects of a multimodal educational intervention for primary care providers at six months. BMC Med. Educ. 2012, 12, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Al-Dabaan, R.; Asimakopoulou, K.; Newton, J.T. Effectiveness of a web-based child protection training programme designed for dental practitioners in Saudi Arabia: A pre- and post-test study. Eur. J. Dent. Educ. 2016, 20, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Ashri, N.; Al-Amro, H.; Hamadah, L.; Al-Tuwaijri, S.; El Metwally, A. Dental and medical practitioners’ awareness and attitude toward evidence based practice in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A comparative study. Saudi J. Dent. Res. 2014, 5, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bowling, A. Research Methods in Health: Investigating Health and Health Services; McGraw-Hill Education: Berkshire, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  43. Trochim, W.M. Research Methods Knowledge Base. Available online: https://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/sampnon.phpcited-2006 (accessed on 16 June 2017).
  44. Hoffman, A.J. Enhancing self-efficacy for optimized patient outcomes through the theory of symptom self-management. Cancer Nurs. 2013, 36, E16–E26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yohannes, A.M.; Dodd, M.; Morris, J.; Webb, K. Reliability and validity of a single item measure of quality of life scale for adult patients with cystic fibrosis. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2011, 9, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Saudi Human Rights Commission. Available online: http://www.sa.undp.org/content/saudi_arabia/en/home/presscenter/articles/2017/01/10/hrc-and-ohchr-seminar-.html/2017 (accessed on 7 December 2017).
  47. Dougall, A.; Pani, S.; Thompson, S.; Faulks, D.; Romer, M.; Nunn, J. Developing an undergraduate curriculum in Special Care Dentistry-by consensus. Eur. J. Dent. Educ. 2013, 17, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 14 01549 g001 550
Figure 1. Frequency distribution by gender of participants’ opinion on the suitable oral health provider for AMPD (N = 481).
Figure 1. Frequency distribution by gender of participants’ opinion on the suitable oral health provider for AMPD (N = 481).
Ijerph 14 01549 g001
Ijerph 14 01549 g002 550
Figure 2. Frequency distribution by gender of participants’ response to the statement “would you like to be part of the team that manages AMPD?” (N = 509).
Figure 2. Frequency distribution by gender of participants’ response to the statement “would you like to be part of the team that manages AMPD?” (N = 509).
Ijerph 14 01549 g002
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of the responding dentists as a whole (N = 523) and within each gender.
Table 1. Characteristics of the responding dentists as a whole (N = 523) and within each gender.
VariableMales (N)Females (N)Total a N (%)
Age
≤25–35116207323 (62.4)
36–457649125 (24.1)
46–55233457 (11.0)
56–656511 (2.1)
≥66202 (0.4)
Place of work
Government education institute86120207 (39.9)
Private clinic5371124 (24.0)
Private education institute124052 (10.1)
Government hospital6049109 (21.1)
Private general hospital121325 (4.8)
Years of experience
≤10 years150218368 (71.2)
≥11 years7376149 (28.8)
Degree/certificate attained
Bachelor (BDS †) degree75155230 (44.8)
Master degree5677133 (25.9)
Board certification492675 (14.6)
Doctorate/PhD degree241943 (8.4)
Other (e.g., fellowship)161632 (6.2)
Origin of highest degree
North America or Europe6833101 (19.8)
Elsewhere i.e., Local (Saudi Arabia), Asia, Africa152258410 (80.2)
a Total (does not include missing data); † Bachelor of Dental Science.
Table
Table 2. Aspects of providing treatment to AMPD among the responding dentists as a whole (N = 523) and within each gender.
Table 2. Aspects of providing treatment to AMPD among the responding dentists as a whole (N = 523) and within each gender.
VariableMales (N)Females (N) Total a N (%)
Attended workshop for managing AMPD
Yes415596 (18.4)
No182243425 (81.6)
Interest in attending workshop for managing AMPD in the future
Yes158228386 (74.1)
No6570135 (25.9)
Interest in treating patients with PD a,b
Yes169212382 (73.1)
No5486140 (26.9)
Interest in treating patients with MD †
Yes123142265 (50.9)
No156100256 (49.1)
Attitude towards treating AMPD
Try to examine and treat144163307 (58.9)
Examine and refer or refer directly6480144 (27.6)
Other responses155570 (13.4)
Previous experience in managing AMPD
Negative or extremely negative262448 (9.2)
Positive or extremely positive144137281 (53.9)
Had no previous experience60132192 (36.9)
Managed to complete the treatment for AMPD in the dental clinic (with or without conscious sedation) *
Yes135128263 (79.9)
No283866 (20.1)
Self-efficacy in managing AMPD
Low3990129 (24.9)
Moderate131185316 (60.9)
High522274 (14.2)
a Total (does not include missing data); b PD = physical disability; † MD = mental disabilities; * sample for 330 respondents with previous experience.
Table
Table 3. Bivariate analyses of factors associated with “High” self-efficacy in managing AMPD.
Table 3. Bivariate analyses of factors associated with “High” self-efficacy in managing AMPD.
VariableCategoryN (%)OR95% CIp
GenderFemale22 (7.4) 0.0005
Male52 23.4)3.822.24–6.52
Age≤45 Years54 (12.1) 0.001
≥46 Years19 (27.5)2.771.52–5.05
EducationBachelor degree19 (8.3) 0.001
Postgraduate training53 (18.8)2.571.47–4.48
Origin of degreeElsewhere45 (11.0) 0.0001
North America and Europe28 (28.0)3.151.84–5.38
RankOther23 (8.0) 0.0001
Consultant/specialist50 (21.9)3.221.90–5.47
SpecialtyOther specialties65 (13.3) 0.008
Pediatric dentistry7 (38.9)4.161.58–11.12
Years of experience≤10 Years34 (9.3) 0.0001
≥11 Years40 (26.8)3.262.17–5.96
Previous experience in managing AMPDNo6 (3.1) 0.0001
Yes68 (20.7)8.113.45–19.18
Aware of rules for managing AMPDNo29 (8.6) 0.0001
Yes43 (27.0)3.962.63–6.65
Attended workshop on AMPD managementNo50 (11.8) 0.001
Yes24 (24.7)2.451.42–4.25
OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.
Table
Table 4. Multivariable analyses of adjusted factors of “High” self-efficacy in managing AMPD.
Table 4. Multivariable analyses of adjusted factors of “High” self-efficacy in managing AMPD.
Explanatory VariableCategoriesWald ValueAOR (95% CI)p-Value
GenderFemale5.6410.018
Male2.39 (1.16–4.89)
Age x Gender 4.856.45 (1.23–33.91)0.028
Years of experience≤10 Years4.2810.039
≥11 years2.19 (1.04–4.47)
SpecialtyOther specialties5.9310.015
Pediatric dentistry3.98 (1.31–12.07)
Previous experience in managing AMPDNo8.3610.004
Yes4.23 (1.59–11.22)
Aware of rules for managing AMPDNo7.4910.002
Yes2.62 (1.42–4.38)
AOR (95% CI) = Adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

AlQahtani, S.; Murshid, E.Z.; Fadel, H.T.; Kassim, S. Practicing Dentists’ Self-Efficacy and Associated Factors in Managing the Treatment of Adults with Mental and Physical Disabilities: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1549. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121549

AMA Style

AlQahtani S, Murshid EZ, Fadel HT, Kassim S. Practicing Dentists’ Self-Efficacy and Associated Factors in Managing the Treatment of Adults with Mental and Physical Disabilities: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017; 14(12):1549. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121549

Chicago/Turabian Style

AlQahtani, Sakher, Ebtissam Zakaria Murshid, Hani Talal Fadel, and Saba Kassim. 2017. "Practicing Dentists’ Self-Efficacy and Associated Factors in Managing the Treatment of Adults with Mental and Physical Disabilities: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14, no. 12: 1549. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121549

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop