Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Associations among Substance Use, Mental Health Disorders, and Self-Harm in a Prison Population: Examining Group Risk for Suicide Attempt
Previous Article in Journal
Health and Wellbeing of Occupants in Highly Energy Efficient Buildings: A Field Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Clinical Prediction of Suicide and Undetermined Death: A Pseudo-Prospective Clinical and Medico-Legal Study of Substance Abusers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 14
Issue 3
10.3390/ijerph14030316
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Risk of Suicide and Dysfunctional Patterns of Personality among Bereaved Substance Users

by
Laura Masferrer
1,2,* and
Beatriz Caparrós
2
1
Public Drug Centre, Cas Teresa Ferrer-CAS Ripoll, Institut d’Assistència Sanitària (IAS), 17003 Girona, Spain
2
Department of Psychology, University of Girona, 17071 Girona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14(3), 316; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14030316
Submission received: 3 February 2017 / Revised: 12 March 2017 / Accepted: 15 March 2017 / Published: 20 March 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue From Understanding Suicide Risk to Preventing Suicide)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Research has shown that suicide is a phenomenon highly present among the drug dependent population. Different studies have demonstrated an upraised level of comorbidity between personality disorders (PD) and substance use disorders (SUD). This study aimed to describe which PDs are more frequent among those patients with a risk of suicide. Methods: The study was based on a consecutive non-probabilistic convenience sample of 196 bereaved patients attended to in a Public Addiction Center in Girona (Spain). Sociodemographic data, as well as suicide and drug related characteristics were recorded. The risk of suicide was assessed with the Spanish version of “Risk of suicide”. Personality disorders were measured with the Spanish version of Millon Multiaxial Clinical Inventory. Results: The PDs more associated with the presence of risk of suicide were depressive, avoidant, schizotypal and borderline disorders. However, the histrionic, narcissistic and compulsive PDs are inversely associated with risk of suicide even though the narcissistic scale had no statistical correlation. Conclusions: The risk of suicide is a significant factor to take into account related to patients with SUD and especially with the presence of specific PDs. These findings underline the importance of diagnosing and treating rigorously patients with SUD.

1. Introduction

Approximately 800,000 people die due to suicide around the world every year [1,2]. Suicidal risk is a very complex behavior that is influenced by interacting biological, genetic, psychological, social, environmental and situational factors, as several authors have described [3,4].
The link between the risk of suicide and substance use disorders (SUD) is well documented [5,6,7,8]. Li and collaborators [9] showed that the risk of suicide was 7.5 times higher in males and 11.7 times higher in females with a mental or SUD compared to males and females with no disorder. In another recent study among the SUD population, Masferrer et al. [10] found that 61.2% of 196 bereaved SUD patients reported a risk of suicide in a large study focused on describing related variables of risk of suicide among bereaved addicted patients. Taking into account the connection between the risk of suicide and SUD, our interest is to analyze two important variables, personality disorder and risk of suicide, because it could have an important influence on the particular and complex association between these constructs. Our interest is to study the risk of suicide as associated with the comorbid dysfunctional patterns of personality in SUD patients.
Personality Disorders (PDs) are defined as inflexible and maladaptive personality traits that are exhibited in a wide range of personal and interpersonal contexts [11]. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5 [11], in section II, defines PDs as categorical entities. However, based on the discussion of early research [12,13,14,15,16], PDs have been characterized as dimensional constructs related to a framework that provides a unified model of psychopathology established on shared personality traits. In fact, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-5, in section III, proposes a dimensional alternative model. In the framework of this dimensional approach of psychopathology, Millon’s integrative model of personality disorders [17,18] proposes an explanation of the structure of personality styles on the background of ecological adaptation. Millon classifies personality disorders in accordance with four main dimensions: Personalities with difficulties in taking pleasure (i.e., with schizoid, avoidant or depressive disorders), personalities with interpersonal problems (with dependent, histrionic, narcissistic or antisocial disorders), personalities with intrapsychic conflicts (with sadistic, compulsive, negativistic or masochistic disorders) and personalities with structural deficits (with schizotypal, borderline or paranoid disorders). The latter three pathological personality patterns (schizotypal, borderline and paranoid) represent, in terms of Millon’s theory, more advanced stages of personality pathology and structural impairment.
PDs can seriously influence the course, prognosis and the treatment outcomes of SUDs [19]. Reporting a diagnosis of PD is linked with greater impairments as well as a lower quality of life [20,21]. The presence of PD is a greatly prevalent comorbid disorder among substance users [22,23,24,25]. In fact, different studies have demonstrated a high level of comorbidity between PD and SUD [26,27,28,29,30,31]. As Krueger and Eaton [32] stated, comorbidity is the rule not the exception. In this regard, Gonzalez [33] found a prevalence of any personality disorder of 42% among a sample of 53 alcohol and drug dependent inpatients. Colpaert and collaborators [27] reported a rate of 42.6% for at least one PD among 274 patients admitted to a residential substance abuse treatment. Casadio et al. [26] described a rate of 62.2% among addiction outpatients. Moreover, Verheul [19] concluded that rates of PDs among the drug dependent population are four times higher than among the general population.
Bearing in mind the negative impact of PDs and the potential risk of suicide, this study aimed to describe which dysfunctional patterns of personality are more frequent among those SUD patients with a risk of suicide and which dysfunctional patterns of personality are more frequent among those without a risk of suicide.

2. Material and Methods

The current study is part of wider research. The main goal of this research was to describe the complicated grief symptomatology among a sample of 196 bereaved SUD patients. For more information, see Masferrer et al. [10].

2.1. Participants

The current research was based on a consecutive non-probabilistic convenience sample of individuals (n = 196) attended the Public Addiction Treatment Centre in Girona (Catalonia, Spain). To join the study, patients had to meet the following three inclusion criteria: (a) they had a diagnosis of substance use disorder (SUD) (alcohol, cocaine or heroin dependence) according to the 4th revised edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) criteria; (b) loss of a significant person (family, best friend or partner) at some time in their life, but at least a year previously to the interview; and (c) abstinence during the last month to avoid any toxic effects of drugs. The majority of patients (78.1%) were male, more than a third (37.2%) were married or with a partner. Related to the main drug diagnosis, the majority of the patients (68.9%) reported alcohol dependence, 18.4% heroin dependence and 12.8% cocaine dependence.

2.2. Measures

For the assessment of the risk of suicide, we used the Spanish version of the Risk of Suicide (RS) from Plutchick et al. [34]. The RS could discriminate between individuals and patients with no suicide attempts and those having a history of them. It consists of 15 items with dichotomous responses (yes/no). The RS embraces issues about previous attempts, ideation intensity of current feelings of depression and hopelessness, and other aspects of the attempts. The total score is obtained by summing all items (maximum score 15). The cut-off suggested by the authors of the Spanish version [35] was 6. Internal consistency of the test is 0.90.
Personality disorders were measured by the Millon Multiaxial Clinical Inventory [36], the Spanish translation by Cardenal and Sánchez-López [37]. The MCMI-III consists of 175 items with dichotomous answers (true/false), a self-report questionnaire that measures 11 clinical personality patterns, 3 traits of severe personality pathology, 7 syndromes of moderate severity, 3 severe syndromes and a validity scale and 3 modifying indices. The PDs scales cover major diagnostic criteria of DSM-IV-TR. We adopted the most conservative criteria with scores equal or greater than 85 to determine the presence of the PDs. Clinical personality patterns (schizoid, avoidant, depressive, dependent, histrionic, narcissistic, antisocial, sadistic, compulsive, negativistic and masochistic) and 3 traits of severe personality pathology (schizotypal, borderline, and paranoid) were used in the current research.

2.3. Procedure

Those patients who met the three inclusion criteria were informed by their therapist about potential participation in the study. The research procedure consisted of a single visit with a psychologist who administered the questionnaires included in the study protocol. All patients were previously informed about the study procedure as well as terms of confidentiality. Informed consent was obtained from all participants and the protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics and Research Review Board of the Institut Assistència Sanitària (IAS) (No. S041-779).

2.4. Statistical Analyses

The risk of suicide was measured as the relative frequency and the 95% level of confidence of participants above the RS cut-off point. In order to compare individuals with and without risk of suicide, we performed a bivariate analysis of the PD scores of the patients according to the risk of suicide. According to the nonparametric Kolmogorov Sminov test, the different Millon’s scales did not follow a normal distribution and the significance was below 0.05 (except for the negativist scale which is the only scale with normal distribution with a signification of 0.072). Due to the small group of PDs, we used a non-parametric statistical test. When PDs were defined as categorical variables, we used a Fischer Exact test and when PDs were defined as a dimensional variable, we used U Mann Whitney and Spearman’s correlation. A multiple regression analysis was performed to determine which dysfunctional patterns of personality were associated with the risk of suicide. The results are expressed as absolute numbers, percentages, as well as the mean and standard deviations. A statistical significance of 0.05 was used to compare hypotheses. Data processing and analysis were performed using the SPSS statistical program version 21.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Dysfunctional Patterns of Personality

Taking into account that we adopted the most conservative criteria of Millon’s scoring for describing the presence of PD (scores equal or greater than 85), the presence of any PD among the sample was 29.4%. Describing the occurrence according to each PD, those PD with higher frequency were compulsive (7.1%) and narcissistic (7.1%), followed by antisocial (4.6%) and sadistic (3.1%). Twenty-four percent of the patients reported a presence of one PD and only 1.5% two PD. On the other hand, avoidant, dependent and masochistic were not present as a disorder.
The first objective of the study was determine which PDs (scoring equal or greater than 85) are more frequent among those patients with a risk of suicide and which PDs are more frequent among those without a risk of suicide. Bearing in mind that the number of PDs was small, we performed a non-parametric statistical test. The results of relationship between PDs as categorical variables and the risk of suicide are set out in Table 1, in which the Fischer Exact test was carried out. What stands out in the first table is that, in the risk of suicide group, there is a higher presence of schizoid, depressive, narcissistic, antisocial, sadistic, schizotypal, borderline and paranoid cases, although the differences between the groups are not statistically significant in any case. The histrionic and compulsive disorders are more present, in a significant way, in the no risk of suicide group. If we compare the direct scores of the different scales of PDs, significant differences are shown in the scores of all scales except in narcissistic through the U Mann Whitney analysis (Table 2). Furthermore, those patients grouped in the risk of suicide presented a higher mean than those without risk, not including histrionic, narcissistic, compulsive and borderline.

3.2. Analysis of the Relationship between Symptomatology of PDs and Risk of Suicide

In addition, the relationship between the risk of suicide and symptomatology of PDs was investigated using Spearman’s correlation coefficient (Table 3). The different scores of PDs showed a significant association with the risk of suicide, with the exception of the narcissistic. The three higher and stronger correlations were borderline (r = 0.703), depressive (r = 0.628) and masochistic (r = 0.529). Otherwise, results indicated an inverse correlation between the risk of suicide and histrionic, narcissistic and compulsive scales, even though the narcissistic scale did not have any statistical correlation.

3.3. Predictive Characteristics of Risk of Suicide

Another main objective of the study was to determine which PDs were associated with the risk of suicide. Thus, in order to describe this, a multiple regression, in which scores of the risk of suicide, as dimensional variables, were the dependent variable, was performed while sociodemographic, suicide-related characteristics (age, gender, education, marital status and patient’s suicide attempt) and dysfunctional patterns of personality were considered independent variables. The results were presented in Table 4. Those dysfunctional patterns of personality defined also as dimensional variables associated with the risk of suicide were avoidant, depressive, schizotypal and borderline.

4. Discussion

Almost one third of our sample (29.4%) reported some PDs. Therefore, PDs are quite frequent among the current SUD sample, which is in agreement with those results obtained by previous studies [23,24,25]. Comorbid PD and SUD represent a robust determinant of elevated suicide risk [38]. However, the scales in which there are any cases with a score above 85 were avoidant, dependent and masochistic.
The primary goal of this study was to determine which dysfunctional patterns of personality are more frequent among those patients with a risk of suicide and which PDs are more frequent among those without a risk of suicide. There are very few patients who reported high scorings of PD in the sample. When we have dichotomized PD variables in “presence of PD” or “absence of PD”, it can be seen that there are very few cases. The differences between the group of “risk of suicide” and “no risk of suicide” are not significant in the different PD, except for histrionic, sadistic and compulsive. However, it should be noted that more PDs were associated with the risk of suicide than without the risk of suicide. Histrionic and compulsive are more frequent in the no risk of suicide group, and sadistic in the risk of suicide group. For this reason and following the theoretical approach of early research [13,15,16], we wanted to analyze more thoroughly the different PD scales in a dimensional way. Consistent with our expectations, reporting a high scoring in PDs’ scales is linked with the risk of suicide, except in the cases of the histrionic, narcissistic and compulsive scales, although histrionic and compulsive are the only scales in which the differences are statistically significant. Specifically, when analyzing how PDs scoring and the risk of suicide perform, borderline, depressive and masochistic are the three scales with a higher association with risk of suicide. These results confirm the important role of PDs as risk factors for suicide as other studies suggested [39,40].
An important finding was that the narcissistic, compulsive and histrionic scales had an inverse correlation with the risk of suicide. A potential explanation for these findings might be that stating personality traits of these scales could be defined as protective factors against suicidal risk. Nowadays, some personality characteristics from those PDs are greatly accepted and promoted in Western society [41]. These results lead us to reflect on previous investigations carried out with the MCMI [37], in which a curved model of the narcissistic, histrionic and compulsive scales is considered, meaning that it is the low and the high scores that indicate non-adaptation, whereas intermediate levels on these scales would reflect adaptive patterns, unlike what happens in relation to other scales [41]. Turning next to the narcissistic scale, it was the only PD with no present relationship with the risk of suicide. This finding indicates that the narcissistic PD appears to be a distinct group among cluster B personality disorders related to suicidal risk but this outcome is contrary to that of Pompili and his collaborators [3], who found that individuals with cluster B personality disorders have a greater risk of dying by suicide. At this point, it should be taken into account that presenting specific personality traits does not necessarily entail negative consequences in relation to the presence of mental health problems but reporting many personality traits could be associated to a general dysfunctional pattern of personality, so could be linked to risk of suicide. Therefore, it is important to be aware of differences between dimensional analysis (direct scoring) and categorical analysis (presence–absence of PD) in order to describe the specific characteristics that may be more protective for those who make up the PD. As some authors stated [42], each case has a profile that emerges from quantitative variations and different levels ranging from normal to pathology without the need to cut-off that could be artificial.
In order to identify which PDs were linked to the risk of suicide, a multiple regression analysis was conducted. Talking about the sociodemographic variables related to the risk of suicide, marital status was the only relevant characteristic. Being separated or divorced and widowed was statistically significant with the risk of suicide. These results are in accord with previous studies [43]. The current study also found that reporting a previous suicide attempt was associated with the risk of suicide, which was consistent with several examples of previous research [44]. In fact, reporting a previous suicide attempt and being separated or being widow were the variables with a major contribution to risk of suicide according to the Table 4.
The regression analysis revealed that the presence of avoidant, borderline, schizotypal and depressive are all associated with the risk of suicide. These results are broadly consistent with previous research [3,45,46,47,48]. A diagnosis of borderline PD doubled the risk of suicide when compared to patients diagnosed with other types of PD [38]. Links and his collaborators [47] found that 25.6% of participants with borderline PD attempted suicide during the course of one year of treatment. Moreover, 60% to 70% of patients with borderline PD reported a history of suicidal behavior [49]. These relationships may partly be explained by the role of impulsivity as a key background factor [3].
PDs are relevant factors to take into account related to the risk of suicide among SUD patients. As a practical implication of the present findings, the results indicate that the identification of comorbidity of SUD is important for improving the treatment among the bereaved drug-dependent population as well as reducing suicidal ideation because, as Schneider et al. noted [40], treating PDs is essential for suicide prevention.
The current research presented some limitations that should be considered. It is important to mention that this study was performed using a convenience sample of bereaved substance users, who attended a drug addiction treatment center. Therefore, our sample might be different from the general drug user population. Furthermore, the current research had a cross-sectional design and we relied on self-reporting measures. Thus, we must be cautious due to the small number of PD cases according with the most conservative scoring of Millon [36]. Notwithstanding these limitations, this study provided significant data related to the specificity of the sample. Clarifying the pattern of risk across mental disorders is a necessary step to identify where resources can be most effectively targeted and interventions prioritized [50].

5. Conclusions

To date, there are no studies that have investigated the association between risk of suicide and dysfunctional patterns of personality among a bereaved SUD sample. As predicted, reporting PDs are linked with the risk of suicide, with the exception of the narcissistic scale. The presence of avoidant, depressive, schizotypal and borderline personality disorders are associated with the risk of suicide. In conclusion, these findings outline the importance of performing therapeutic interventions in order to focus on PD in those bereaved SUD patients and to reduce and prevent the risk of suicide.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the valuable contributions of Garre-Olmo. We thank the support of Arnau Gavaldà and Laia Figueras. We also appreciate the professionals from CAS Teresa Ferrer (IAS) for their help in the collection of data and to the patients for their participation.

Author Contributions

Laura Masferrer and Beatriz Caparrós conceived and designed the research. Laura Masferrer collected field data and write the manuscript. Beatriz Caparrós contributed to analysis tools and provided critical review. Both authors performed the statistical analysis, interpreted the results and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Preventing Suicide: A Global Imperative. Available online: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/131056/1/9789241564779_eng.pdf?ua¼1&ua¼1 (accessed on 14 October 2016).
  2. World Health Organization. SDG Target 3.4, Indicator 3.4.2 Suicide Mortality Rate. Available online: http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/2016/whs2016_AnnexA_Suicide.pdf?ua=1&ua=1 (accessed on 8 December 2016).
  3. Pompili, M.; Seragini, G.; Innamorati, M.; Dominici, G.; Ferracuti, S.; Kotzalidis, G.; Serra, G.; Girardi, P.; Janiri, L.; Tatarelli, R.; et al. Suicidal behavior and alcohol abuse. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 1392–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wasserman, D. A stress-vulnerability model and the development of the suicidal process. In Suicide: An Unnecessary Death; Wasserman, D., Ed.; Matin Dunitz: London, UK, 2001; pp. 13–27. [Google Scholar]
  5. Arsenault-Lapierre, G.; Kim, C.; Turecki, G. Psychiatric diagnoses in 3275 suicides: A meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Ferrari, A.J.; Norman, R.E.; Freedman, G.; Baxter, A.J.; Pirkis, J.A.; Harris, M.G.; Page, A.; Carnahan, E.; Degenhardt, L.; Vos, T.; et al. The burden attributable to mental and substance use disorders as risk factors for suicide: Findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Patel, V.; Ramasundarahettige, C.; Vijayakumar, L.; Thakur, J.S.; Gajalakshmi, V.; Gururaj, G.; Suraweera, W.; Jha, P.; Million Death Study Collaborators. Suicide mortality in India: A nationally representative survey. Lancet 2012, 379, 2343–2351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Phillips, M.R.; Cheng, H.G. The changing global face of suicide. Lancet 2012, 379, 2318–2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Z.; Page, A.; Martin, G.; Taylor, R. Attributable risk of psychiatric and socio-economic factors for suicide from individual-level, population-based studies: A systematic review. Soc. Sci. Med. 2011, 72, 608–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Masferrer, L.; Garre-Olmo, J.; Caparros, B. Risk of suicide: Its occurrence and related variables among bereaved substance users. J. Subst. Use 2015, 21, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed.; APA: Washington, DC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  12. Clark, L.A.; Watson, D.; Reynolds, D.C. Diagnosis and classification of psychopathology. Challenges to the current system and future directions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1995, 46, 121–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Eaton, N.R.; South, S.C.; Krueger, R.F. The meaning of comorbidity among common mental disorders. In Contemporary Diretions in Psychopathology, 2nd ed.; Millon, T., Krueger, R., Simonsen, E., Eds.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 223–241. [Google Scholar]
  14. Krueger, R.F. The structure of common mental disorders. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1999, 56, 921–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Krueger, R.F. Continuity of Axes I and II: Toward a unified model of personality, personality disorders, and clinical disorders. J. Personal. Disord. 2005, 19, 233–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Widiger, T.A.; Trull, T.J. Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder. Am. Psychol. 2007, 62, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Millon, T.; Davis, R.D. Personology: A theory based on evolutionary concepts. In Major Theories of Personality Disorder; Clarkin, J.F., Lenzenweger, M.F., Eds.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 1996; pp. 221–346. [Google Scholar]
  18. Millon, T. Classifying personality disorders: An evolution-based alternative to an evidence-based approach. J. Personal. Disord. 2011, 25, 279–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Verheul, R. Co-morbidity of personality disorders in individuals with substance use disorders. Eur. Psychiatry 2001, 16, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Skodol, A.E.; Oldham, J.E.; Gallaher, P.E. Axis II comorbidity of substance use disorders among patients referred for treatment of personality disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 1999, 156, 733–738. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Fassino, S.; Daga, G.A.; Delsedime, N.; Rogna, L.; Boggio, S. Quality of life and personality disorders in heroin abusers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004, 76, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Agrawal, A.; Narayanan, G.; Oltmanns, T.F. Personality pathology and alcohol dependence at midlife in a community sample. Personal. Disord. 2013, 4, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Goldstein, R.B.; Dawson, D.A.; Chou, S.P.; Grant, B.F. Sex differences in prevalence and comorbidity of alcohol and drug use disorders: Results from wave 2 of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 2012, 73, 938–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Langas, A.; Malt, U.; Opjordsmoen, S. In-depth study of personality disorders in first-admission patients with substance use disorders. BMC Psychiatry 2012, 12, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Trull, T.J.; Jahng, S.; Tomko, R.L.; Wood, P.K.; Sher, K.J. Revised NESARC personality disorder diagnoses: Gender, prevalence, and comorbidity with substance dependence disorders. J. Personal. Disord. 2010, 24, 412–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Casadio, P.; Olivoni, D.; Ferrari, B.; Pintori, C.; Speranza, E.; Bosi, M.; Belli, V.; Baruzzi, L.; Pantieri, P.; Ragazzaini, G.; et al. Personality disorders in addiction outpatients: Prevalence and effects on psychosocial functioning. Subst. Abuse: Res. Treat. 2014, 8, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Colpaert, K.; Vanderplasschen, W.; De Maeyer, J.; Broekaert, E.; De Fruyt, F. Prevalence and determinants of personality disorders in a clinical sample of alcohol-, drug-, and dual- dependent patients. Subst. Use Misuse 2012, 47, 649–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Jahng, S.; Trull, T.; Wood, P.; Tragesser, S.; Tomko, R.; Grant, J.; Bucholz, K.; Sher, K. Distinguishing general and specific personality disorder features and implications for substance dependence comorbidity. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2011, 120, 656–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Salazar-Fraile, J.; Ripoll-Alandes, C.; Bobes, J. Nacisismo manifiesto, narcisismo encubierto y trastornos de personalidad en una unidad de conductas adictivas: Validez predictive de respuesta a tratamiento. Adicciones 2010, 22, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Sher, K.; Trull, T. Substance use disorder and personality disorder. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2002, 4, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Walcott, G.; Martin, J.; Hicking, F.W. The prevalence of personality disorders in a psychiatric and substance abuse population in Jamaica. West Indian Med. J. 2013, 62, 458–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Krueger, R.F.; Eaton, N.R. Transdiagnostic factors of mental disorders. World Psychiatry. 2015, 14, 27–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gonzalez, C. Screening for personality disorders in a drug and alcohol dependence. Psychiatry Res. 2014, 217, 121–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Plutchick, R.; Van Praga, H.M.; Conte, H.R.; Picard, S. Correlates of suicide and violence risk 1: The suicide risk measure. Compr. Psychiatry 1989, 30, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rubio, G.; Montero, I.; Jauregui, J.; Villanueva, R.; Casado, M.A.; Marín, J.J.; Santo-Domingo, J. Validación de la escala de riesgo suicida de Plutchik en población española. Arch. Neurobiol. 1998, 61, 143–152. [Google Scholar]
  36. Millon, T.; Davis, R.; Millon, C. MCMI-III Manual, 3rd ed.; NCS Pearson: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  37. Cardenal, V.; Sánchez-López. Manual MCMI-III. Adaptación y Baremación Españolas; TEA Ediciones: Madrid, Spain, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  38. Doyle, M.; While, D.; Mok, P.L.; Windfuhr, K.; Ashcroft, D.M.; Kontopantelis, E.; Chew-Graham, L.A.; Appleby, L.; Shaw, J.; Webb, R. Suicide risk in primary care patients diagnosed with a personality disorder: A nested case control study. BMC Fam. Pract. 2016, 17, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Samuels, J. Personality disorders: Epidemiology and public health issues. Int. Rev. Psychiatry 2011, 23, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Schneider, B.; Schnabel, A.; Wetterling, T.; Bartusch, B.; Weber, B.; Georgi, K. How do personality disorders modify suicide risk? J. Personal. Disord. 2008, 22, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Caparrós, B.; Villar, E. Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory III (MCMI-III) and communication styles in a sample of university students. Span. J. Psychol. 2013, 16, e85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zachar, P.; Kendler, K. Philosophical issues in the classification of psychopathology. In Contemporany Directions in Psychopathology; Millon, T., Krueger, R., Sorensen, E., Eds.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 127–148. [Google Scholar]
  43. Masocco, M.; Pompili, M.; Vanacore, N.; Innamorati, M.; Lester, D.; Girardi, P.; Tatarelli, R.; Vichi, M. Completed suicide and marital status according to the Italian region of origin. Psychiatry Q. 2010, 81, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ten, H.; de Graaf, M.; de Graaf, R.; Van Dorsselaer, S.; Verdurmen, J.; van’t Land, H.; Volleberg, W.; Beekman, A. Incidence and course of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in the general population. Can. J. Psychiatry 2009, 54, 824–833. [Google Scholar]
  45. Black, D.W.; Blum, N.; Pfohl, B.; Hale, N. Suicidal behavior in borderline personality disorder: Prevalence, risk factors, prediction, and prevention. J. Personal. Disord. 2004, 18, 226–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Krysinska, K.; Heller, T.S.; De Leo, D. Suicide and deliberate self-harm in personality disorders. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 2006, 19, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Links, P.L.; Kolla, N.J.; Guimond, T.; McMain, S. Prospective risk factors for suicide attempts in a treated sample of patients with borderline personality disorder. Can. J. Pyschiatry 2013, 58, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zeng, R.; Cohen, L.J.; Tanis, T.; Qizilbash, A.; Lopatyuk, Y.; Yaseen, Z.S.; Galynker, I. Assessing the contribution of borderline personality disorder and features to suicide risk in psychiatric inpatients with bipolar disorder, major depression and schizoaffective disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2015, 226, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Oldham, J.M. Borderline personality disorder and suicidality. Am. J. Psychiatry 2006, 163, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Chesney, E.; Goodwin, G.M.; Fazel, S. Risks of all- cause and suicide mortality in mental disorders: A meta-review. World Psychiatry 2014, 13, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Relationship between personality disorders (PDs) and risk of suicide.
Table 1. Relationship between personality disorders (PDs) and risk of suicide.
Personality DisorderPresence/Absence of DisorderPresence of Disorder (n, (%))No Risk of SuicideRisk of Suicidep
Schizoidno disorder 76 (100)118 (98.3)0.523
disorder2 (1)02 (1.7)
Avoidantno disorder 76 (100)120 (100)-
disorder0--
Depressiveno disorder 76 (100)119 (99.2)1.000
disorder1 (0.5)01 (0.8)
Dependentno disorder 76 (100)120 (100)-
disorder0--
Histrionicno disorder 73 (96.1)120 (100)0.057
disorder3 (1.5)3 (3.9)0
Narcissisticno disorder 70 (92.1)112 (93.3)0.781
disorder14 (7.1)6 (7.9)8 (6.7)
Antisocialno disorder 74 (97.4)113 (94.2)0.487
disorder9 (4.6)2 (2.6)7 (5.8)
Sadisticno disorder 76 (100)114 (95)0.084
disorder6 (3.1)06 (5)
Compulsiveno disorder 67 (88.2)115 (95.8)0.050
disorder14 (7.1)9 (11.8)5 (4.2)
Negativistno disorder 76 (100)118 (98.3)0.523
disorder2 (1)02 (1.7)
Masochisticno disorder 76 (100)120 (100)-
disorder0--
Schizotypalno disorder 76 (100)119 (99.2)1.000
disorder1 (0.5)01 (0.8)
Borderlineno disorder 76 (100)118 (98.3)0.523
disorder2 (1)02 (1.7)
Paranoidno disorder 75 (98.7)117 (97.5)1.000
disorder4 (2)1 (1.3)3 (2.5)
Table
Table 2. Mann–Whitney U test of PD symptoms related to presence of risk of suicide (M (SD)).
Table 2. Mann–Whitney U test of PD symptoms related to presence of risk of suicide (M (SD)).
MCMI-III ScalesNo RiskRisk of SuicideUZ
Schizoid7.07 (3.68)10.88 (4.73)<0.001−5.448
Avoidant6.58 (4.47)9.73 (5.64)<0.001−3.677
Depressive5.87 (4.84)12.21 (5.59)<0.001−7.051
Dependent7.57 (4.73)10.07 (4.91)0.001−3.237
Histrionic15.03 (4.14)12.34 (5.10)<0.001−3.610
Narcissistic14.72 (4.06)14.17 (4.65)0.410−0.824
Antisocial9.93 (5.23)12.94 (5.14)<0.001−3.783
Sadistic9.46 (5.13)13.30 (5.36)<0.001−4.710
Compulsive17.04 (4.26)14.97 (4.48)0.002−3.157
Negativist8.67 (4.84)13.36 (5.79)<0.001−5.487
Masochistic3.71 (3.44)8.12 (4.55)<0.001−6.486
Schizotypal 4.84 (4.67)9.44 (5.86)<0.001−5.586
Borderline5.87 (12.43)3.94 (5.46)<0.001−7.768
Paranoid8.2 (5.64)11.30 (6.26)0.001−3.382
Table
Table 3. Relationship between symptomatology of PD and risk of suicide through the Spearman’ correlation.
Table 3. Relationship between symptomatology of PD and risk of suicide through the Spearman’ correlation.
MCMI-III ScalesSpearman’s Correlationp
Schizoid0.492 *<0.001
Avoidant0.334 *<0.001
Depressive0.628 *<0.001
Dependent0.354 *<0.001
Histrionic−0.324 *<0.001
Narcissistic−0.0720.314
Antisocial0.347 *<0.001
Sadistic0.417 *<0.001
Compulsive−0.310 *<0.001
Negativist0.493 *<0.001
Masochistic0.529 *<0.001
Schizotypal 0.523 *<0.001
Borderline0.703 *<0.001
Paranoid0.320 *<0.001
* Correlation is significant in the level 0.01.
Table
Table 4. Multiple regression analysis of dysfunctional patterns of personality associated with risk of suicide.
Table 4. Multiple regression analysis of dysfunctional patterns of personality associated with risk of suicide.
Unstandardized CoefficientsStandardized Coefficientstp95% Confidence Interval for B
BStandard ErrorBetaLower BoundUpper Bound
Constant6.2892.100 2.9950.0032.14410.433
Age0.0040.0170.0130.2630.793−0.0290.037
Gender0.2390.3660.0290.6530.515−0.4830.961
Education0.4410.3380.0601.3040.194−0.2271.108
Marital status
Single0.1250.4040.0150.3100.757−0.6720.922
Separated1.2350.3530.1713.4980.0010.5381.931
Widow2.6120.5790.2084.514<0.0011.4703.754
Patient’s suicide attempt−2.1620.353−0.299−6.116<0.001−2.860−1.464
Schizoid0.0770.0550.1081.4210.157−0.0300.185
Avoidant−0.1180.054−0.189−2.2000.029−0.223−0.012
Depressive0.1350.0450.2433.0330.0030.0470.223
Dependent−0.0210.043−0.030−0.4770.634−0.1060.065
Histrionic−0.0490.057−0.071−0.8560.393−0.1620.064
Narcissistic−0.0310.048−0.041−0.6570.512−0.1260.063
Antisocial−0.0420.051−0.067−0.8230.412−0.1430.059
Sadistic0.0300.0490.0500.6160.539−0.0660.127
Compulsive−0.0240.047−0.032−0.5190.604−0.1170.068
Negativist0.0320.0490.0560.6580.511−0.0650.130
Masochistic0.0460.0590.0630.7810.436−0.0700.162
Schizotypal0.1040.0490.1792.1010.0370.0060.202
Borderline0.1690.0580.2922.9320.0040.0550.283
Paranoid−0.0500.043−0.091−1.1700.244−0.1340.034

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Masferrer, L.; Caparrós, B. Risk of Suicide and Dysfunctional Patterns of Personality among Bereaved Substance Users. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14030316

AMA Style

Masferrer L, Caparrós B. Risk of Suicide and Dysfunctional Patterns of Personality among Bereaved Substance Users. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017; 14(3):316. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14030316

Chicago/Turabian Style

Masferrer, Laura, and Beatriz Caparrós. 2017. "Risk of Suicide and Dysfunctional Patterns of Personality among Bereaved Substance Users" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14, no. 3: 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14030316

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop