Next Article in Journal
Antibiotic Resistance and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Escherichia coli Isolates from Hospital Wastewater in Vietnam
Previous Article in Journal
Nutrition Transition and Biocultural Determinants of Obesity among Cameroonian Migrants in Urban Cameroon and France
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Road Environments: Impact of Metals on Human Health in Heavily Congested Cities of Poland

Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30 Mickiewicza Av., 30-059 Kraków, Poland
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14(7), 697; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070697
Submission received: 14 June 2017 / Revised: 20 June 2017 / Accepted: 26 June 2017 / Published: 29 June 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Health)

Abstract

:
Road dust as a by-product of exhaust and non-exhaust emissions can be a major cause of systemic oxidative stress and multiple disorders. Substantial amounts of road dust are repeatedly resuspended, in particular at traffic lights and junctions where more braking is involved, causing potential threat to pedestrians, especially children. In order to determine the degree of contamination in the heavily traffic-congested cities of Poland, a total of 148 samples of road dust (RD), sludge from storm drains (SL) and roadside soil (RS) were collected. Sixteen metals were analysed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) and atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) in all samples. Chemical evaluation followed by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) revealed that road environments have been severely contaminated with traffic-related elements. Concentration of copper in all road-environment samples is even higher, exceeding even up to 15 times its average concentrations established for the surrounding soils. Non-carcinogenic health risk assessment revealed that the hazard index (HI) for children in all road-environment samples exceeds the safe level of 1. Therefore, greater attention should be paid to potential health risks caused by the ingestion of traffic-related particles during outdoor activities.

1. Introduction

Non-exhaust emission from traffic-related sources is considered the priority issue by the European Union within its sustainable transport strategy, since it greatly contributes to the overall problem of air pollution. However, despite the ongoing fight for better air quality, the vast majority of populations in urban areas is still exposed to air which does not comply with any World Health Organisation (WHO) Air Quality Guidelines and therefore causes a serious health threat. Kelly and Fussell [1] confirm that air pollution is a major cause of various health conditions such as pulmonary and systemic oxidative stress and inflammation, translocation of particle constituents and an associated risk of vascular dysfunction, atherosclerosis, altered cardiac autonomic function, ischaemic cardiovascular and obstructive pulmonary diseases, hemorrhagic stroke and increased cerebrovascular ischemia [2,3] or even cancer [4]. For the primary PM10, half of the airborne particles come from non-exhaust emissions originating from multiple sources, with the most significant one being brake lining wear. As reported by Garg et al. [5] and Kukutschová et al. [6], over 50% of brake debris becomes airborne, 80% of which is PM10 and 60% is PM2.5. According to Harrison et al. [7], in urban environments, brake wear can contribute up to 55% to the total non-exhaust traffic-related PM10 emissions and up to 21% to the total traffic-related PM10 emissions [7,8]. Garg et al. [5], Bukowiecki et al. [8] and Iijima et al. [9] estimate that about 50% of brake wear debris is deposited on roads or nearby. Road dust may also become contaminated in the process of tire and road-surface abrasion. According to Wikand Dave [10], followed by Panko et al. [11], 0.1–10% of tire debris becomes airborne. The rest is deposited on roads or in their close vicinity. Approximately 5% to 30% of non-exhaust traffic-related PM10 emissions can be attributed to tire wear particles [6], which are estimated to be 0.8% up to 7% by mass of ambient PM10. In terms of ambient concentrations, this corresponds to values ranging from 0.05 to 11 μg·m−3 [7,10,11,12]. Abrasion of tire tread generates coarse particles of 50–80 μm. These particles are composed mostly of minerals (61%), 13% carbon black, 16% polymers and 10% plasticisers and oils. The average mass of a new car tire is approximately 8 kg; during its lifetime it loses up to 1.5 kg. This means that within 3 years, 10–20% of the rubber enters the environment due to abrasion. It is estimated that about 90% of tire wear debris is deposited on the road or in close vicinity to roads. Very advanced studies on roadside pollution using test-plots were conducted by Wawer et al. [13]. Moreover, a substantial amount of road dust becomes resuspended and might be regarded as a secondary pollution source (50% according to Garg et al. [5]; Kukutschová et al. [6]; Bukowiecki et al. [8]).
According to Duong and Lee [14], the concentrations of heavy metals in road dust vary significantly depending on traffic and road features (roundabouts, motorway roads, traffic lights, etc.). Concentrations of metals in road dust from motorways are approximately twice the amount determined near roundabouts and downtown areas. During rapid braking, brakes are exposed to extensive heat from friction, which is transmitted to brake discs and results in the emission of particles. The most intense brake wear obviously occurs at intersections, corners, traffic lights, and through forced braking. According to Österle et al. [15], standard brake linings consist of 48% barite, 14% vermiculite, 19% phenolic resin, 4.6% antimonite, 5% rubber, 6.4% aramide, and 0.3% sulfur. The composition, function and friction testing of brake materials and additives have been discussed in detail by Chan and Stachowiak [16]. A wide variety of components are commonly used in vehicle brake lining, from steel or glass fibres and plastics that serve as reinforcements, to brass chips that are used for their heat-conducting properties. Authors such as Grigoratos and Martini [17] and Adamiec et al. [18] report that 90% of all metals originating from brake pads are bound to fraction < 20 μm. A wide variety of materials used in brakes contributes to the complexity of non-exhaust vehicle emissions. Most of them are a potential health hazard. Due to significant variability, identifying the chemical composition of road dust from vehicles is complex. Since most studies on toxicity and health consequences of roadside PM focus on exhaust emission, particles from the non-exhaust sources are yet to be better [19] and their health effects are disregarded in policy regulations despite obvious links with respiratory and cardiovascular health problems and, consequently, morbidity [20,21,22,23,24]. Airborne particles have been extensively examined by many researchers; however, particles from non-exhaust emissions, an important source of air pollution, have not been as well documented [7,25,26]. Extensive regulations on exhaust emission and technological improvements in the automobile industry have decreased the percentage of tailpipe emissions to total ambient PM concentrations [27,28,29]. The automotive industry has been forced to comply with environmental requirements since European Commission has established a set of Euro norms regarding LDVs (light duty vehicles) and HDVs (heavy duty vehicles). This has led to new developments in technologies employed to control exhaust emission, while non-exhaust particle emissions still remain high. Rexeis and Hausberger [30] estimated that by the end of this decade even 90% of the total emissions from road traffic may come from non-exhaust sources. With the current lack of any EU regulations, there is social interest in establishing a new set of recommendations regarding non-exhaust emissions. However, in order to provide general recommendations, it is necessary to broaden the existent knowledge by performing comprehensive studies on non-exhaust emission.
The main objective of the study was to evaluate metal contamination in various road-environment samples such as road dust, sludge from storm drains and roadside topsoil obtained from four of the biggest and highly congested cities in Poland, a country facing the worst air pollution problem in Europe. Werkenthin et al. [31] present a very interesting survey of advanced studies on metals in European roadside soils. Interestingly, there are fewer studies on road dust and only sporadic projects on sludge. However, in order to fully characterise roadside pollution, a complex analysis of sources other than soil (e.g., road dust or sludge from storm drains) is crucial. In the present research, concentrations of the selected metals Ba, Co, Cr, Mn, Ni, Se, Sn, Zr and well-known traffic indicators such as Cd, Cu, Pb, Sb, Ti, Zn were determined in all road environment samples. Data sets have been processed with the use of Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Chemical analyses have been supplemented by the calculation of pollution index (PI) for selected metals. Furthermore, the results were used to calculate an average daily dose through ingestion (ADD), hazards index (HI) and hazard quotient (HQ) for Ba, Cd, Co, Cu, Mn, Mo, Pb, Sb, Se, Sn, Zn and Zr and to assess the potential non-carcinogenic risk of traffic-related elements in road-environment samples, with adverse effects on child and adult health in particular.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling Area

The most traffic-congested cities of Poland (Krakow, Opole, Wroclaw and Warszawa) were selected as research sites. Over the last two decades, all four have faced significant decline in heavy industry. In each city, eight sampling areas were selected near roads with very high road traffic, junctions, and heavy pedestrian traffic. They were located as far as possible from industrial plants and far from residential areas to minimise the impact of contamination sources. Samples were taken monthly starting from May to November 2015 to avoid the impact of other non-traffic-related pollutants, such as those emitted from household furnaces. Research areas are depicted on Figure 1 [32] and in Table 1. A total of 148 road-environment samples have been collected, including road sediment, sludge form storm drains and roadside topsoil (from 20 cm depth). The examined section of the road was straight, with no more than 3% slope, approx. 10–15 m in width with asphalt pavement surface and curbs of about 3–5 m width on each side of the road. Samples were taken after 5 days with no rainfall; temperatures varied between 8 °C and 24 °C. Samples of road dust (RD), including field duplicates, were collected in situ using a vacuum cleaner specifically modified for collecting road dust; some samples were sprayed with water and swept with a brush from the road (rectangle 4 m × 2 m). The results obtained with both methods were comparable. Sludge (SL) was sampled from storm drains in the amounts of about 1000 mg. Roadside topsoil (RS) was collected from square sections of 1 m × 1 m, at 20 cm depth (about 10 m away from the bridge).

2.2. Methods

Road dust, roadside topsoil and sludge from storm drains were digested with aqua regia according to 3050A protocol [33]. The concentrations for Ba, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se, Sn, Ti, W, Zn, and Zr were then determined using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (ELAN 6100; Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) according to U.S. EPA 6020B protocol [34]. The obtained data set has been processed with the use of PCA. PCA is one of the most common multivariate statistical methods used in environmental and geochemical studies [35,36,37,38]. All results were preprocessed and statistically evaluated according to van den Berg et al. [39] using Statistica 12.0 Software (STAT Lt., Ligonier, PA, USA). After centering and autoscaling the data, PCA was carried out to ascertain factors possibly contributing to concentrations of 11 metals in road dust, sludge from storm drains and roadside soil.
The concentrations of metals in road dust were then compared with median concentrations determined for the surrounding soils by Lis, Pasieczna [40] for Krakow, Tomassi-Morawiec et al. [41] for Warszawa, and Tomassi-Morawiec et al. [42] for Wroclaw and Opole.
Furthermore, PI (pollution index) was calculated from Equation (1):
PI = Ci/Ni
where Ci is the concentration of metal and Ni stands for the geochemical background derived as the median concentration for the surrounding soils by Lis, Pasieczna [40] for Krakow, Tomassi-Morawiec et al. [41] for Warszawa, Tomassi-Morawiec et al. [42] for Wroclaw and Opole. PI index for each metal can be classified as non-pollution (PI ≤ 1), low level of pollution (1 < PI ≤ 2), moderate level of pollution (2 < PI ≤ 3), strong level of pollution (3 < PI ≤ 5) and very strong level of pollution (PI > 5) [43,44].
In order to assess the non-carcinogenic risk for children and adults from road dust, sludge from storm drains and roadside topsoil, an average daily intake dose of deleterious substances and exposure through ingestion (ADD) of Ba, Cd, Co, Cu, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se, Sn, Zn and Zr was calculated from the following formula according to U.S. EPA [45].
ADD = (Ci × IngR × EF × ED × CF)/(BW × AT)
where Ci is the concentration of metal in the exposure site (mg/kg), (see Table 2); IngR is the ingestion rate 100 mg/day for children, and 50 mg/day for adults according to the recommended value for daily soil and dust ingestion [45,46,47]; EF is the exposure frequency of 350 days/year; BW is the average body weight 15 kg for children, 60 kg for adults; AT for non-carcinogenic (ED × 365 days); ED is the exposure duration; CF is the conversion factor 10−6 kg/mg. All parameters used in the calculation of ADD were found in U.S. EPA Exposure Handbook [45].
The potential non-carcinogenic risk of Ba, Cd, Co, Cu, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se, Sn, Zn and Zr was evaluated by the hazard quotient (HQ).
HQ = ADD/RfD
where oral reference dose (RfD) was obtained from Regional Screening Levels (RSLs)-Generic Tables [48]. Since the RfD for Pb was not specified in RSLs U.S. EPA Report [49], in this study the RfD value is 3.5 × 10−3 mg/kg body weight per day according to [49,50,51,52,53,54].
If the HQ < 1, then non-carcinogenic toxic effects are unlikely. If HQ ≥ 1, then potential adverse health effects may occur. HQ > 10 suggests a high chronic risk [45]. Though interactions between metals might result in a synergic effect, the hazard index (HI) was used to assess the overall potential for non-carcinogenic effects of deleterious substances. HI, which is the sum of HQ was calculated from Equation (4):
HI = i = 1 n HQi
If HI < 1, then there is no significant risk. If HI > 1, there is a chance that non-carcinogenic toxic effects may be possible, with the increasing probability as HI increases [45,55].

2.3. Data Quality

In order to obtain unambiguous and unbiased ICP-MS results, elements were additionally measured using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) (OPTIMA 7300DV; Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA), atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) (F-AAS Thermo Scientific IC 3500, Waltham, MA, USA), according to U.S. EPA method 7000 in the Laboratory of Trace Analyses at the Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, AGH University of Science and Technology. Analyses were performed according to standard certified analytical quality control procedure (PN-EN ISO 17294-1:2007). Moreover, reagent blanks and certified international reference material METRANAL™ 32 (light sandy soil, grain size <100 µm; Analytika, Praha, Czech Republic) were used to ensure that the analytical results met the required criteria. Analyses of the reference material verified and confirmed the quality of the results. Analytical bias was statistically insignificant (p = 0.05) and the precisions of AAS and ICP-MS systems were satisfactory, which was verified by six different solution injections. Rh was used as an internal standard. Using ICP-MS, element correction equations were used for each element to minimise the impact of interferences.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Statistical Parameters of Traffic-Related Elements in Road Environments

Concentrations of Cr, Cu, Ni and Pb, Ti, Zn, Zr, well-known indicators of traffic pollution, were severely elevated in all types of road-environment samples, especially those collected in Warszawa, Krakow and Wroclaw. These are the biggest cities of Poland, which are densely populated and therefore greatly affected by traffic. Opole, on the other hand, where the concentrations of the investigated metals were much lower, is considered to be a medium-sized city with the population of 17 to 7 times smaller than Warszawa, Krakow or Wroclaw. As such it is less traffic-congested. Statistical parameters of the examined road-environment samples are presented in Table 2.
Table 3 presents metal contamination in road dust and topsoil samples collected in recreational areas in each of the four cities. They are considered to be unpolluted control samples. The top soil values are median concentrations obtained for the surrounding soils by Lis, Pasieczna [40] for Krakow; Tomassi-Morawiec et al. [41] for Warszawa; and Tomassi-Morawiec et al. [42] for Wroclaw and Opole.

3.2. Chemometric Analysis of Metal Concentrations in Road-Environment Samples

PCA revealed two main components accounting for 63.36% of the total variance. Comp. 1 accounts for 37.84% of the total variance and is strongly positively correlated with Co, Cd, Sb and Ni. Furthermore, 25.52% of the variance is characterised by Comp. 2, which has a strong positive correlation with Ti, Zn and Zr. Score projection and loadings on the bi-dimensional space, defined by first two principal components, have been presented in Figure 2.
Samples can be grouped into three groups. On the right hand side of the bottom section in Figure 2, road dust (RD) samples (Positive Comp. 1, Negative Comp. 2) are grouped close to Cd, Co, Sb, Cu, Cr and Ni. Copper found in the road environment can primarily come from the wear of reinforcing fibres used in the form of chips or granules in brake linings as well as CuS used as a friction additive. Elevated concentrations of Cd in road-environment samples could be sourced from brake lining components such as plated brake parts, especially rotors in amounts as high as 39.4%, as reported by McKenzie et al. [55]. Cr in road-environment samples can originate from the erosion or abrasion of metal plating and bodywork, as well as Cr2O3 used as a frictional additive. Contamination of road dust with chromium can also be the result of Cr being one of the main components in alloys used to produce wrist pins and connecting rods. A portion of both Cr and Ni in road samples can come both from the sand paper effect of tires on yellow and red marking paint, and from abrasion of the grey paint and anticorrosive on guardrails. Moreover, Sb and Cu compounds such as CuS, Sb2S3 are commonly used as frictional additives in brake pads [16]. The second isolated group consists of sludge (SL) samples characterised by positive values for Comp. 1 and Comp. 2 of slightly negative values, which are located close to metals such as Zn, Ba, Zr and Ti. Contamination with Zn can be attributed to the wear and tear of tires, since ZnO and ZnS are added to activate vulcanisation in the tire tread; however, Zn could also come from traffic signals or guardrails, where it is found in easily mobilised forms affecting soil and water environments [56,57]. Elevated amounts of Ba in road dust could be a consequence of using BaSO4 to improve wear resistance, as well as from guardrails [33,57]. Severely elevated concentrations of Ti in all types of road-environment samples in the examined cities may be of anthropogenic origin [58]; they might be linked to the use of alkali metal titanates as inorganic fillers for the purpose of stabilizing friction coefficient. The third group consists of roadside soil samples strongly correlated with Pb. In road dust and sludge from drains, concentrations of Pb were significantly lower. This suggests that elevated concentrations of Pb in roadside soil may come from “historical” contamination, since this element was an important component of bearing alloys and was commonly used in wheel balancing weights (now replaced by zinc weights) or Pbantidetonant in the form of organic alkyllead [59] as a gasoline additive (this was officially banned in Poland in 2004). Detailed correlation analysis revealed that road dust from Nowohucki bridge significantly differed from other samples since it contained higher concentrations of Cd, Co, Mo, Ni, Pb, and Sb. During the sampling campaign, the nearby ArcelorMittal steel plant suffered a failure, which resulted in heavy emissions of dust (total of 3.7 tones) into the atmosphere [60]. The results obtained in the analysis could be related to this event.

3.3. Assessment of Road Environmental Pollution

The highest median concentrations of Zn were recorded in the sludge collected from Krakow (681 mg/kg) and Warszawa (650 mg/kg). Its concentrations in road dust from those two cities were considerably lower, 345 mg/kg and 276 mg/kg, respectively. Concentrations of copper in all road-environment samples were even higher, exceeding 8 to 19 times the average concentration established for the surrounding soils. In Krakow, the concentration of Cu ranges from 27.2 mg/kg in roadside soil up to 499 mg/kg in sludge, and in Warszawa it varies from 45.3 mg/kg in roadside soil up to 339 mg/kg in road dust. The highest concentrations of Cd in all road-environment samples were found in Krakow and Wroclaw. Similarly, the concentrations of Pb were the highest in sludge from storm drains and road dust collected in those two cities.
PI index calculated for road-environment samples in Warszawa was 9–13 for Cu, 3–7 for Cr, 1–4 for Pb, 7 for Ti, and, 3–10 for Zn. PI index determined for road-environment samples in Krakow was comparably high and equalled 10–15 for Cu, 3–9 for Cr, 3–4 for Pb, 10–20 for Ti and 3–6 for Zn. Additionally, high concentrations of Cd were also recorded in Krakow, especially in roadside soil (PI 5), indicating a high level of contamination. In Wroclaw, PI indicates an extremely high Cr and Ti contamination in all types of road-environment samples, ranging from 5–18 for Cr to 11–16 for Ti. PI indices for Cu and Zn are relatively high in Wroclaw, ranging between 2–4 for Cu and 4–6 for Zn. In Opole, PI indicates moderate to high contamination. Figure 3 shows pollution Index (PI) values for Ba, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Ti in the examined road environment samples.

3.4. Non-Carcinogenic Health Risk Assessment

Potential non-carcinogenic health risk (HQ) and the hazard index (HI) for children in heavily congested road urban environments are presented in Table 4.
An average HQ index for children was calculated with respect to traffic-related elements in road dust samples collected in Krakow, Warszawa, Wroclaw, Opole; the results are presented in descending order: Zr (6.81 × 10−1) > Co (1 × 10−1) > Sb (1.32 × 10−1) > Se (8.33 × 10−2) > Pb (5.90 × 10−2) > Mo (5.57 × 10−2) > Zn (4.61 × 10−2) > Cu (1.23 × 10−2) > Cd (3.07 × 10−3) > Ba (2.77 × 10−3) > Sn (1.62 × 10−4). The results determined for sludge from drain storms were as follows: Zr (7.52 × 10−1) > Co (1.48 × 10−1) = Sb (1.48 × 10−1) > Se (1.21 × 10−1) > Zn (6.95 × 10−2) > Mo (6.83 × 10−2) > Pb (6.81 × 10−2) > Mn (5.58 × 10−2) > Cu (1.41 × 10−2) > Cd (5.42 × 10−3) > Ba (3.36 × 10−3) > Sn (2.05 × 10−4); for the roadside soil the results were the following: Zr (6.43 × 10−1) > (1.74 × 10−1) > Zn (1.52 × 10−1) > Co (1.25 × 10−1) > Sn (1.17 × 10−1) > Pb (9.89 × 10−2) > Se (8.34 × 10−2) > Mo (5.41 × 10−2) > Sb (5.07 × 10−2) > Cd (1.21 × 10−2) > Cu (7.20 × 10−3) > Ba (4.79 × 10−3). Table 5 presents non-carcinogenic HQ and the HI for adults calculated with respect to traffic-related elements in road environmental samples.
The results of calculations for road dust are presented in the descending order as follows: Zr (3.62 × 10−1) > Sb (8.17 × 10−2) > Co (6.95 × 10−2) > Se (4.54 × 10−2) > Mo (3.84 × 10−2) > Pb (3.44 × 10−2) > Mn (3.23 × 10−2) > Zn (2.54 × 10−2) > Mn (2.10 × 10−2) > Cu (7.42 × 10−3) > Cd (1.73 × 10−3) > Ba (1.73 × 10−3) > Sn (8.77 × 10−5). Results determined for samples of sludge from drain storm are as follows: Zr (1.08 × 10−1) > Co (9.52 × 10−2) > Sb (5.50 × 10−2) > Cu (3.78 × 10−2) > Se (1.49 × 10−1) > Mn (1.19 × 10−1) > Zn (9.63 × 10−3) > Pb (9.03 × 10−3) > Mo (2.79 × 10−2) > Cd (2.07 × 10−2) > Cu (1.41 × 10−2) > Cd (5.42 × 10−3) > Ba (3.36 × 10−3) > Sn (2.05 × 10−4); finally, for roadside soil the results were as follows: Zr (3.21 × 10−1) > Co (6.52 × 10−2) > Pb (5.98 × 10−2) > Se (4.68 × 10−2) > Mo (3.82 × 10−2) > Mn (2.92 × 10−2) Sb (2.79 × 10−2) > Zn (2.64 × 10−2) > Mn (1.82 × 10−2) > Cd (1.21 × 10−2) > Ba (3.73 × 10−4) > Sn (8.07 × 10−5).
HQ levels for traffic−related elements were found to be lower than 1.0 in all cases, which means that there was no non−carcinogenic toxic risks for any of the metals when analysed separately. This seemed true both for children and adults. HI index for adults determined for the selected metals (Ba, Cd, Co, Cu, Mn, Mo, Pb, Sb, Se, Sn, Zn and Zr) was also less than 1.0, therefore confirming that the exposure to environmental road samples was safe for adults. However, this was different for children, since HI index in that case exceeded the acceptable value of 1.0, signifying potential hazard. The HI values in road dust range from 1.08 (Krakow) up to 1.60 (Opole). In the sludge, they vary from 1.26 (Wroclaw) to 1.58 (Opole) and in roadside soil from 1.25 (Opole) to 1.83 (Krakow). Therefore, greater attention should be paid to adverse effects on children’s health caused by potential ingestion of traffic−related particles in road environments, e.g., at street crossings. It would also be important to determine the speciation of traffic−related metals in road environmental samples to better understand the health risks they pose for humans and the environment.

4. Conclusions

The results of chemical analysis, followed by the calculation of pollution index (PI) for various components of road environment in Warszawa, Krakow, Wroclaw and Opole revealed that road dust, mixed sludge and sediment from storm drains as well as roadside soils were significantly contaminated with all of the investigated elements, in particular with Cu, Pb, Ti and Zn. The highest concentrations were found in samples of sludge from drain storms collected from all investigated cities. Sludge samples were approximately 20% more contaminated with metals than road dust and roadside soils. PCA has revealed that both road dust and sludge are strongly correlated with elements derived mostly from brake pads, tires and as a result of road surface abrasion due to frictional effects.
HQ indices calculated for the analysed traffic−related elements were all lower than 1.0, potentially indicating non−carcinogenic effect. HI index for selected metals (Ba, Cd, Co, Cu, Mn, Mo, Pb, Sb, Se, Sn, Zn and Zr) for adults fell within the safe value. However, in the case of children, the HI values exceeded the safe level of 1.0 for road dust, sludge from storm drains and roadside topsoil in all investigated cities. Therefore, monitoring of road environments should be intensified, since road dust as a byproduct of exhaust and non−exhaust particulate emissions easily enters human airways and may have an adverse effect on health.

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the Polish−Norwegian Research Programme operated by the National Centre for Research and Development under the Norwegian Financial Mechanism 2009–2014 in the frame of Project Contract No Pol−Nor/208849/106/2015.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Kelly, F.J.; Fussell, J.C. Air pollution and public health: Emerging hazards and improved understanding of risk. Environ. Geochem. Health 2015, 37, 631–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pope, A.C.; Burnett, R.T.; Turner, M.C.; Krewski, D.; Jerrett, M.; Gapstur, S.M.; Thun, M.J. Research lung cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality associated with ambient air pollution and cigarette smoke: Shape of the exposure-response relationships. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 1616–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pope, A.C.; Dockery, D.W. Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: Lines that connect. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2012, 56, 709–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Loeb, L.A. A mutator phenotype in cancer. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 3230–3239. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Garg, B.D.; Cadle, S.H.; Mulawa, P.A.; Groblicki, P.J. Brake wear particulate matter emissions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 4463–4469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kukutschová, J.; Moravec, P.; Tomášek, V.; Matějka, V.; Smolík, J.; Schwarz, J.; Seidlerová, J.; Šafářová, K.; Filip, P. On airborne nano/micro-sized wear particles released from low-metallic automotive brakes. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 998–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Harrison, R.M.; Jones, A.M.; Gietl, J.; Yin, J.; Green, D.C. Estimation of the contributions of brake dust, tire wear, and resuspension to nonexhaust traffic particles derived from atmospheric measurements. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 6523–6529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bukowiecki, N.; Lienemann, P.; Hill, M.; Figi, R.; Richard, A.; Furger, M.; Rickers, K.; Falkenberg, G.; Zhao, Y.; Cliff, S.S.; et al. Real-world emission factors for antimony and other brake wear related trace elements: Size segregated values for light and heavy duty vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 8072–8078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Iijima, A.; Sato, K.; Yano, K.; Tago, H.; Kato, M.; Kimura, H.; Furuta, N. Particle size and composition distribution analysis of automotive brake abrasion dusts for the evaluation of antimony sources of airborne particulate matter. Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41, 4908–4919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wik, A.; Dave, G. Occurrence and effects of tire wear particles in the environment—A critical review and an initial risk assessment. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Panko, J.M.; Chu, J.; Kreider, M.L.; Unice, K.M. Measurement of airborne concentrations of tire and road wear particles in urban and rural areas of France, Japan, and the United States. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 72, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kreider, M.L.; Doyle-Eisele, M.; Russell, R.G.; McDonald, J.D.; Panko, J.M. Evaluation of potential for toxicity from subacute inhalation of tire and road wear particles in rats. Inhal. Toxicol. 2012, 24, 907–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wawer, M.; Magiera, T.; Ojha, G.; Appel, E.; Bućko, M.S.; Kusza, G. Characteristics of current roadside pollution using test-monitoring plots. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 505, 795–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Duong, T.; Lee, B.K. Determining contamination level of heavy metals in road dust from busy traffic areas with different characteristics. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92, 554–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Österle, W.; Griepentrog, M.; Gross, T.; Urban, I. Chemical and microstructural changes induced by friction and wear of brakes. Wear 2001, 251, 1469–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chan, D.; Stachowiak, G.W. Review of automotive brake friction materials. J. Automob. Eng. 2004, 218, 953–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Grigoratos, T.; Martini, G. Brake emissions: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 2491–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Adamiec, E.; Jarosz-Krzemińska, E.; Wieszała, R. Heavy metals from non-exhaust vehicle emissions in urban and motorway road dusts. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016, 188, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Van der Gon, H.A.; Gerlofs−Nijland, M.E.; Gehrig, R.; Gustafsson, M.; Janssen, N.; Harrison, R.M.; Hulskotte, J.; Johansson, C.; Jozwicka, M.; Keuken, M.; et al. The policy relevance of wear emissions from road transport, now and in the future—An international workshop report and consensus statement. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2013, 63, 136–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Mantecca, P.; Sancini, G.; Moschini, E.; Farina, F.; Gualtieri, M.; Rohr, A.; Miserocchi, G.; Palestini, P.; Camatini, M. Lung toxicity induced by intratracheal instillation of size-fractionated tire particles. Toxicol. Lett. 2009, 189, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kelly, F.J.; Fussell, J.C. Air pollution and airway disease. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2011, 41, 1059–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Potgieter−Vermaak, S.; Rotondo, G.; Novakovic, V.; Rollins, S.; Van Grieken, R. Component−specific toxic concerns of the inhalable fraction of urban road dust. Environ. Geochem. Health 2012, 34, 689–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jedrychowski, W.A.; Perera, F.P.; Spengler, J.D.; Mróz, E.; Stigter, L.; Flak, E.; Majewska, R.; Klimaszewska−Rembiasz, M.; Jacek, R. Intrauterine exposure to fine particulate matter as a risk factor for increased susceptibility to acute bronchopulmonary infections in early childhood. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2013, 216, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Briggs, D.; Mason, K.; Borman, B. Rapid assessment of environmental health impacts for policy support: The example of road transport in New Zealand. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Harrison, R.M.; Beddows, D.C.S.; Dall’Osto, M. PMF analysis of wide-range particle size spectra collected on a major highway. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 5522–5528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Amato, F.; Cassee, F.R.C.; van der Gon, H.A.; Gehrig, R.; Gustafsson, M.; Hafner, W.; Harrison, R.M.; Jozwicka, M.; Kelly, F.J.; Moreno, T.; et al. Urban air quality: The challenge of traffic non-exhaust emissions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 275, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mathissen, M.; Scheer, V.; Vogt, R.; Benter, T. Investigation on the potential generation of ultrafine particles from the tire e road interface. Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45, 6172–6179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kumar, P.; Pirjola, L.; Ketzel, M.; Harrison, R.M. Nanoparticle emissions from 11 non-vehicle exhaust sources—A review. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 67, 252–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pant, P.; Harrison, R.M. Estimation of the contribution of road traffic emissions to particulate matter concentrations from field measurements: A review. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 77, 78–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rexeis, M.; Hausberger, S. Trend of vehicle emission levels until 2020−Prognosis based on current vehicle measurements and future emission legislation. Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43, 4689–4698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Werkenthin, M.; Kluge, B.; Wessolek, G. Metals in European roadside soils and soil solution—A review. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 189, 98–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Adamiec, E. Chemical fractionation and mobility of traffic related elements in road environments. Environ. Geochem. Health 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Environmental Protection Agency. Method 3050A: Acid Digestion of Sediments, Sludges, and Soils; Revision 1; EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 1992.
  34. Environmental Protection Agency. Method 6020B: Inductively Coupled Plasma−Mass Spectrometry; Revision 2; EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 1998.
  35. Gunawardana, C.; Goonetilleke, A.; Egodawatta, P.; Dawes, L.; Kokot, S. Source characterisation of road dust based on chemical and mineralogical composition. Chemosphere 2012, 87, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gunawardana, C.; Egodawatta, P.; Goonetilleke, A. Role of particle size and composition in metal adsorption by solids deposited on urban road surfaces. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 184, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Carrero, J.A.; Arrizabalaga, I.; Bustamante, S.J.; Goienaga, N.; Arana, G.; Madariaga, J.M. Diagnosing the traffic impact on roadside soils through a multianalytical data analysis of the concentration profiles of traffic−related elements. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 458–460, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wang, Y.J.; Chen, C.F.; Lin, J.Y. The measurement of dry deposition and surface runoff to quantify urban road pollution in Taipei, Taiwan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10, 5130–5145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Van den Berg, R.A.; Hoefsloot, H.C.J.; Westerhuis, J.A.; Smilde, A.G.; van der Werf, M.J. Centering, scaling, and transformations: Improving the biological information content of metabolomics data. BMC Genom. 2006, 7, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lis, J.; Pasieczna, A. Geochemical Atlas of Upper Silesia; Wydawnictwo Kartograficzne Polskiej Agencji Ekologicznej S.A.: Warszawa, Poland, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  41. Tomassi−Morawiec, H.; Bojakowska, I.; Dusza-Dobek, A.; Pasieczna, A. Geochemical Atlas of Warszawa and Environs; Panstwowy Instytut Geologiczny: Warszawa, Poland, 2016.
  42. Tomassi−Morawiec, H.; Siwek, Z.; Lis, J.; Pasieczna, A. Geochemical atlas of Wroclaw and environs Part 1. In Soils, Watersediments, Surfacewaters; Wydawnictwo Kartograficzne Polskiej Agencji Ekologicznej: Warszawa, Poland, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  43. Hakanson, L. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control: A sedimentological approach. Water Resour. 1998, 14, 975–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, T.B.; Zheng, Y.M.; Lei, M.; Huang, Z.C.; Wu, H.T.; Chen, H.; Fan, K.K.; Yu, K.; Wu, X.; Tian, Q.Z. Assessment of heavy metal pollution in surface soils of urban parks in Beijing, China. Chemosphere 2005, 60, 542–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Exposure Factors Handbook (Final), 2011 ed.; EPA/600/R-09/052F; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. Available online: https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1400/ML14007A666.pdf (accessed on 27 January 2017).
  46. Künzli, N.; Jerrett, M.; Mack, W.J.; Beckerman, B.; La Bree, L.; Gilliland, F.; Tomas, D.; Peter, J.; Hodis, H.N. Ambient air pollution and atherosclerosis in Los Angeles. Environ. Health Perspect. 2015, 113, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Davis, S.; Mirick, D.K. Soil ingestion in children and adults in the same family. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2006, 16, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Regional Screening Levels (RSLs)—Generic Tables (May 2016). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/risk/regional-screening-levels-rsls-generic-tables-may-2016 (accessed on 22 January 2017).
  49. Hu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, J.; Xie, M.J.; Wang, T.J.; Lian, H.Z. Bioaccessibility and health risk of arsenic, mercury and other metals in urban street dusts from a mega-city, Nanjing, China. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 1215–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Yu, B.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Q. Human health risk assessment based on toxicity characteristic leaching procedure and simple bioaccessibility extraction test of toxic metals in urban street dust of Tianjin, China. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e92459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Song, D.; Zhuang, D.; Jiang, D.; Fu, J.; Wang, Q. Integrated health risk assessment of heavy metals in Suxian county, South China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 7100–7117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yang, Y.; Fang, W.; Xue, M.; Xu, Z.; Huang, C. TSP, PM10 and health risk assessment for heavy metals (Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb) in the ambience of the production line for waste cathode ray tube recycling. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2016, 18, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wan, D.; Zhan, C.; Yang, G.; Liu, X.; Yang, J. Preliminary assessment of health risks of potentially toxic elements in settled dust over Beijing urban area. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhao, N.; Lu, X.; Chao, S. Risk assessment of potentially toxic elements in smaller than 100-µm street dust particles from a valley-city in north western China. Environ. Geochem. Health 2016, 38, 483–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wei, B.; Yang, L. A review of heavy metal contaminations in urban soils, urban road dusts and agricultural soils from China. Microchem. J. 2010, 94, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. McKenzie, E.R.; Money, J.E.; Green, P.G.; Young, T.M. Metals associated with stormwater-relevant brake and tire samples. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 5855–5860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Carrero, J.A.; Goienaga, N.; Olivares, M.; Martinez-Arkarazo, I.; Arana, G. Raman spectroscopy assisted with XRF and chemical simulation to assess the synergic impacts of guardrails and traffic pollutants on urban soils. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2012, 43, 1498–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wilczyńska−Michalik, W.; Rzeźnikiewicz, K.; Pietras, B.; Michalik, M. Fine and ultrafine TiO2 particles in aerosol in Kraków (Poland). Minerologia 2014, 45, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Poperechna, N.; Heumann, K.G. Species-specific GC/ICP-IDMS for trimethyllead determinations in biological and environmental samples. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Daily Newspaper. Available online: http://www.gazetakrakowska.pl/wiadomosci/krakow/a/krakow-tony-pylow-po-awariach-w-hucie.9909907/ (accessed on 17 May 2017). (In Polish).
Figure 1. Sampling areas [32].
Figure 1. Sampling areas [32].
Ijerph 14 00697 g001
Figure 2. Principle component analysis (PCA) biplot for the first and second principle components (PCs) (scores and loadings).
Figure 2. Principle component analysis (PCA) biplot for the first and second principle components (PCs) (scores and loadings).
Ijerph 14 00697 g002
Figure 3. Pollution Index (PI) in road environment.
Figure 3. Pollution Index (PI) in road environment.

ElementBaCdCoCrCuMnNiPbTiZn
KrakowRoad dust111810223123
Sludge232912223206
Roadside soil152315114104
WarszawaRoad dust202711131174
Sludge2127131812710
Road sidesoil21139100473
WroclawRoad dust102164161134
Sludge213184061115
Road sidesoil33252122166
OpoleRoad dust112135141306
Sludge11286142266
Roadside soil22242121154
PI ≤ 1Low contaminated3 < PI ≤ 5Highly contaminated
1 < PI ≤ 3Moderately contaminatedPI > 5Extremely highly contaminated
Table 1. Sampling point location.
Table 1. Sampling point location.
CitySampling Point Location (Bridge and Street Name)Geographical Coordinates
KrakowMost Debnicki (bridge on the Vistula River); Al. Mickiewicza (KR1)50°03′196″N–19°55′726″E
Most Nowohucki (bridge on the Vistula River); Nowohucka Street (KR2)50°03′306″N–19°59′810″E
Kopiec Kosciuszki (Relatively traffic unpolluted area)50°03′245″N–19°53′467″E
WarszawaMost Poniatowski (bridge on the Vistula River) (WA1)52°14′097″N–21°02′301″E
Most Gdanski (bridge on the Vistula River) (WA2)52°15′589″N–21°00′456″E
Fretta Street (Relatively traffic unpolluted area)52°15′099″N–21°00′484″E
OpoleNiemodlinska Street and the bridge on the Odra River (OP1)50°40′144″N–17°54′436″E
Nysy Łuzyckiej Street and the bridge on the Odra River (OP2)50°40′367″N–17°54′860″E
Spacrowa Street (Relatively traffic unpolluted area)50°39′433″N–17°55′354″E
WroclawMost Warszawski (bridge on the Odra River) (WR1)51°07′770″N–17°03′441″E
Most Milenijny (bridge on the Odra River) (WR2)51°08′027″N–16°59′578″E
Bulwar Kulczynskiego(Relatively traffic unpolluted area)51°06′920″N–17°02′304″E
Table 2. Statistical parameters of traffic-related elements in road environment.
Table 2. Statistical parameters of traffic-related elements in road environment.
Element (mg/kg)BaCdCoCrCuMnMoNiPbSbSeSnTiWZnZr
Krakow
road dust (n = 11)min76.70.7883.6130.391.83406.0210.72310.256.010.32757.051795.47
max1422.8913.1215397125028.450.821282.515524.258416.750317.7
median1141.156.9297.71676678.1921.689.521.510416.451110.034510.8
sludge (n = 11)min1622.227.6678.81498843.2128.278.412.812916.673215.058713.9
max2115.4920.8122499165265.335.331132.225126.393722.474919.5
median1932.799.3810319093613.930.694.719.417223.183418.568117.4
roadside soil (n = 11)min51.20.8047.2620.927.21652.308.9568.21.2616.36.011707.051795.08
max20811.220.775.118159719.426.46068.6617014.456119.875612.0
median1095.319.3740.190.635612.217.41263.621006.5640312.24177.25
Warszawa
road dust (n = 11)min32.10.1402.449.3361.511821312.1313.17.877.9614.52773.401316.20
max1741.726.64259339409032920.114326.217132.258518.268313.8
median94.10.3704.7978.114429862566.9626.115.473.124.04997.552769.85
sludge (n = 11)min83.30.4303.4053.510630861795.5223.919.056.426.23007.842386.25
max2062.599.55189285574345026.212466.319010592124.194220.2
median1130.9406.677217341823177.334124.311339.252817.765011.2
roadside soil (n = 11)min71.70.1343.0722.745.313632112.7123.11.9551.611.93795.821257.10
max2381.087.51150220389840332.314112.817522.457724.6108013.4
median1170.4383.2527.511823972613.6696.45.3810114.64889.951969.67
Wroclaw
road dust (n = 11)min52.10.0703.3529.317.21172.378.9211.71.3424.57.392152.7771.76.61
max1870.45013.841515732926.2117644.98.4511871.876216.765225.2
median1080.3507.5414049.42369.3958.222.03.6577.819.74847.382019.58
sludge (n = 11)min97.10.1746.3740.837.92453.1030.232.94.8525.510.65505.381917.07
max3121.9019.516826666125.511813232.414633.0140228.2113726.0
median1710.81312.185.01204228.0463.769.917.287.418.291615.056714.8
roadside soil (n = 11)min1340.9005.1717.911.93301.329.5230.51.3422.07.34726.151356.52
max4916.7310.983.743.37814.6924.170.38.451322879016.561513.8
median2662.608.5045.026.45192.5618.448.63.6578.514.46059.4331110.7
Opole
road dust (n = 11)min99.70.21010.363.245.43534.0635.418.73.60n.d.9.598315.1519410.7
max1711.2619.093727668597.5596.898.716.119842.3143521.589122.4
median1140.63011.211373.054066.4545.037.97.1476.416.711348.7129212.1
sludge (n = 11)min1030.2408.5955.154.42914.1633.428.44.6038.58.617917.362469.62
max1472.0532.796.727950523.465.058614.817644.2158214.654114.9
median1290.76610.673.085.54325.9142.445.57.1113119.99599.9330410.9
roadside soil (n = 11)min1410.5605.7119.310.42411.6813.217.90.7345.546.304615.061466.44
max4031.9712.110855.081418.439.72706.1416027.189416.057019.1
median1981.377.4237.528.74452.8719.634.74.3061.812.75707.892319.8
n.d.—not detected.
Table 3. Metal contamination of relatively unpolluted control samples.
Table 3. Metal contamination of relatively unpolluted control samples.
(mg/kg)BaCdCoCrCuMnMoNiPbSbSeSnTiWZnZr
Krakow
road dust (n = 2)78.961.0138.2716.643.016413.114.856.922.767.315.321817.51078.76
soil (n = 2)70.540.766.1819.633.73852.5314.965.52.6478.87.101169.9485.68.22
top soil *52.00.74.08.011.0319-9.022.0---28-73-
Warszawa
road dust (n = 2)76.21.014.043.343.22146.1425.286.512.473.321.495442.91059.3
soil (n = 2)58.60.79.1513.154.53316.7316.351.93.0386.66.4811710.11056.5
top soil **39.00.502.007.09.0157-515.00---50.0-44-
Wroclaw
road dust (n = 2)69.00.0835.5660.7927.22805.4334.313.02.7656.821.22014.9987.76.88
soil (n = 2)63.90.1733.7931.4617.92673.7211.518.51.4483.47.441213.5279.06.82
top soil ***590.503.0069280-717---25.0-35-
Opole
road dust (n = 2)1120.8129.8557.669.42897.0825.459.318.377.014.270520.799.410.4
soil (n = 2)87.80.55217.422.077.21693.4325.955.510.062.817.415714.5106.86.42
top soil ***590.503.0069280-717---25.0-35-
* median concentrations obtained for the surrounding soils by Lis, Pasieczna [40] for Krakow; ** median concentrations obtained for the surrounding soils by Tomassi-Morawiec et al. [41] for Warszawa; *** median concentrations obtained for the surrounding soils Tomassi-Morawiec et al. [42] for Wroclaw and Opole.
Table 4. Non-carcinogenic health risk (HQ) and the hazard index (HI) for children from metals in road environmental samples.
Table 4. Non-carcinogenic health risk (HQ) and the hazard index (HI) for children from metals in road environmental samples.
ElementsBaCdCoCuMnMoPbSbSeSnZnZrHI
Reference Dose (* RfD)2.00 × 10−11.00 × 10−33.00 × 10−44.00 × 10−21.40 × 10−15.00 × 10−33.50 × 10−34.00 × 10−45.00 × 10−36.00 × 10−13.00 × 10−28.00 × 10−5∑HQi
Krakowroad dust* ADD4.37 × 10−44.41 × 10−62.65 × 10−56.41 × 10−42.56 × 10−33.14 × 10−53.43 × 10−48.25 × 10−53.99 × 10−46.29 × 10−51.32 × 10−34.14 × 10−5
HQI2.19 × 10−34.41 × 10−38.85 × 10−21.60 × 10−21.83 × 10−26.28 × 10−39.81 × 10−22.06 × 10−17.98 × 10−21.05 × 10−44.41 × 10−25.18 × 10−11.08
sludge* ADD7.40 × 10−41.07 × 10−53.61 × 10−57.29 × 10−43.59 × 10−35.33 × 10−53.63 × 10−47.44 × 10−56.60 × 10−48.86 × 10−52.61 × 10−36.67 × 10−5
HQI3.70 × 10−31.07 × 10−21.20 × 10−11.82 × 10−22.56 × 10−21.07 × 10−21.04 × 10−11.86 × 10−11.32 × 10−11.48 × 10−48.71 × 10−28.34 × 10−11.53
roadside soil* ADD4.18 × 10−42.03 × 10−53.61 × 10−53.48 × 10−41.37 × 10−34.68 × 10−54.83 × 10−41.38 × 10−53.84 × 10−42.53 × 10−51.60 × 10−32.80 × 10−5
HQI2.09 × 10−32.03 × 10−21.20 × 10−18.69 × 10−39.75 × 10−39.36 × 10−31.38 × 10−13.45 × 10−27.67 × 10−24.69 × 10−14.69 × 10−14.69 × 10−11.83
Warszawaroad dust* ADD3.61 × 10−41.42 × 10−61.84 × 10−55.52 × 10−41.15 × 10−29.82 × 10−41.00 × 10−45.91 × 10−52.80 × 10−49.21 × 10−51.06 × 10−33.78 × 10−5
HQI1.80 × 10−31.42 × 10−36.12 × 10−21.38 × 10−28.18 × 10−21.96 × 10−12.86 × 10−21.48 × 10−15.61 × 10−21.53 × 10−43.53 × 10−24.72 × 10−11.10
sludge* ADD4.33 × 10−43.61 × 10−62.56 × 10−56.64 × 10−41.60 × 10−21.22 × 10−31.57 × 10−49.32 × 10−54.33 × 10−41.50 × 10−42.49 × 10−34.30 × 10−5
HQI2.17 × 10−33.61 × 10−38.53 × 10−21.66 × 10−21.15 × 10−12.43 × 10−14.49 × 10−22.33 × 10−18.67 × 10−22.51 × 10−48.31 × 10−25.37 × 10−11.45
roadside soil* ADD4.49 × 10−42.38 × 10−61.25 × 10−54.53 × 10−49.19 × 10−31.00 × 10−33.70 × 10−42.06 × 10−53.87 × 10−45.60 × 10−57.52 × 10−43.71 × 10−5
HQI2.24 × 10−32.38 × 10−34.16 × 10−21.13 × 10−26.57 × 10−22.00 × 10−11.06 × 10−15.16 × 10−27.75 × 10−29.33 × 10−52.51 × 10−24.64 × 10−11.05
Wroclawroad dust* ADD6.90 × 10−42.24 × 10−64.82 × 10−53.16 × 10−41.51 × 10−36.00 × 10−51.41 × 10−42.33 × 10−54.97 × 10−41.26 × 10−41.28 × 10−36.12 × 10−5
HQI3.45 × 10−32.24 × 10−31.61 × 10−17.90 × 10−31.08 × 10−21.20 × 10−24.02 × 10−25.83 × 10−29.95 × 10−22.10 × 10−44.28 × 10−27.66 × 10−11.20
sludge* ADD6.90 × 10−42.24 × 10−64.82 × 10−53.16 × 10−41.51 × 10−36.00 × 10−51.41 × 10−42.33 × 10−54.97 × 10−41.26 × 10−41.28 × 10−36.12 × 10−5
HQI3.45 × 10−32.24 × 10−31.61 × 10−17.89 × 10−36.29 × 10−21.20 × 10−24.02 × 10−25.83 × 10−29.95 × 10−22.10 × 10−44.28 × 10−27.66 × 10−11.26
roadside soil* ADD1.70 × 10−31.66 × 10−55.43 × 10−51.69 × 10−43.32 × 10−31.64 × 10−53.10 × 10−41.91 × 10−55.02 × 10−49.21 × 10−51.99 × 10−36.84 × 10−5
HQI8.50 × 10−31.66 × 10−21.81 × 10−14.22 × 10−32.37 × 10−23.27 × 10−38.87 × 10−24.78 × 10−21.00 × 10−11.53 × 10−46.63 × 10−28.55 × 10−11.40
Opoleroad dust* ADD7.29 × 10−44.22 × 10−67.16 × 10−54.67 × 10−42.60 × 10−34.12 × 10−52.42 × 10−44.56 × 10−54.88 × 10−41.07 × 10−41.87 × 10−37.74 × 10−5
HQI3.64 × 10−34.22 × 10−32.39 × 10−11.17 × 10−21.85 × 10−28.25 × 10−36.92 × 10−21.14 × 10−19.77 × 10−21.78 × 10−46.22 × 10−29.67 × 10−11.60
sludge* ADD8.25 × 10−45.11 × 10−66.78 × 10−55.47 × 10−42.76 × 10−33.77 × 10−52.91 × 10−44.54 × 10−58.37 × 10−41.27 × 10−41.94 × 10−36.97 × 10−5
HQI4.12 × 10−35.11 × 10−32.26 × 10−11.37 × 10−21.97 × 10−27.54 × 10−38.31 × 10−21.13 × 10−11.67 × 10−12.12 × 10−46.48 × 10−28.71 × 10−11.58
roadside soil* ADD1.27 × 10−38.95 × 10−64.73 × 10−51.83 × 10−42.84 × 10−31.85 × 10−52.22 × 10−42.75 × 10−53.95 × 10−48.12 × 10−51.48 × 10−36.26 × 10−5
HQI6.33 × 10−38.95 × 10−31.58 × 10−14.59 × 10−32.03 × 10−23.71 × 10−36.34 × 10−26.87 × 10−27.90 × 10−21.35 × 10−44.92 × 10−27.83 × 10−11.25
* ADD (average daily dose through ingestion), * RfD (mg/kg body weight per day), HQI (unitless).
Table 5. Non-carcinogenic HQ and the HI for adults from metals in road environmental samples.
Table 5. Non-carcinogenic HQ and the HI for adults from metals in road environmental samples.
ElementsBaCdCoCuMnMoPbSbSeSnZnZrHI
* RfD2.00 × 10−11.00 × 10−33.00 × 10−44.00 × 10−21.40 × 10−15.00 × 10−33.50 × 10−34.00 × 10−45.00 × 10−36.00 × 10−13.00 × 10−28.00 × 10−5∑HQi
Krakowroad dust* ADD7.81 × 10−57.88 × 10−74.74 × 10−64.57 × 10−45.61 × 10−61.48 × 10−56.13 × 10−51.47 × 10−57.12 × 10−51.12 × 10−52.36 × 10−47.40 × 10−6
HQI3.90 × 10−47.88 × 10−41.58 × 10−21.90 × 10−21.12 × 10−31.34 × 10−31.75 × 10−23.68 × 10−21.42 × 10−21.87 × 10−57.88 × 10−39.25 × 10−22.07 × 10−1
sludge* ADD1.32 × 10−41.92 × 10−66.44 × 10−66.41 × 10−49.52 × 10−62.10 × 10−56.49 × 10−51.33 × 10−51.18 × 10−41.58 × 10−54.66 × 10−41.19 × 10−5
HQI6.61 × 10−41.92 × 10−32.15 × 10−22.67 × 10−21.90 × 10−31.91 × 10−31.85 × 10−23.32 × 10−22.36 × 10−22.64 × 10−51.55 × 10−21.49 × 10−12.94 × 10−1
roadside soil* ADD7.47 × 10−53.63 × 10−66.44 × 10−62.44 × 10−48.36 × 10−61.19 × 10−58.63 × 10−52.47 × 10−66.85 × 10−54.52 × 10−62.86 × 10−45.00 × 10−6
HQI3.73 × 10−43.63 × 10−32.15 × 10−21.02 × 10−21.67 × 10−31.08 × 10−32.47 × 10−26.16 × 10−31.37 × 10−27.53 × 10−69.52 × 10−36.25 × 10−21.55 × 10−1
Warszawaroad dust* ADD6.45 × 10−52.53 × 10−73.28 × 10−62.05 × 10−31.75 × 10−44.77 × 10−61.79 × 10−51.05 × 10−55.01 × 10−51.64 × 10−51.89 × 10−46.75 × 10−6
HQI3.22 × 10−42.53 × 10−41.09 × 10−28.52 × 10−23.51 × 10−24.33 × 10−45.11 × 10−32.64 × 10−21.00 × 10−22.74 × 10−56.30 × 10−38.43 × 10−22.64 × 10−1
sludge* ADD7.74 × 10−56.44 × 10−74.57 × 10−62.86 × 10−32.17 × 10−45.02 × 10−62.81 × 10−51.66 × 10−57.74 × 10−52.68 × 10−54.45 × 10−47.67 × 10−6
HQI3.87 × 10−46.44 × 10−41.52 × 10−21.19 × 10−14.34 × 10−24.56 × 10−48.02 × 10−34.16 × 10−21.55 × 10−24.47 × 10−51.48 × 10−29.59 × 10−23.55 × 10−1
roadside soil* ADD8.01 × 10−54.25 × 10−72.23 × 10−61.64 × 10−31.79 × 10−42.51 × 10−66.60 × 10−53.68 × 10−66.92 × 10−51.00 × 10−51.34 × 10−46.62 × 10−6
HQI4.01 × 10−44.25 × 10−47.42 × 10−36.84 × 10−23.58 × 10−22.28 × 10−41.89 × 10−29.21 × 10−31.38 × 10−21.67 × 10−54.47 × 10−38.28 × 10−22.42 × 10−1
Wroclawroad dust* ADD7.40 × 10−52.40 × 10−75.16 × 10−63.38 × 10−51.62 × 10−46.43 × 10−61.51 × 10−52.50 × 10−65.33 × 10−51.35 × 10−51.38 × 10−46.56 × 10−6
HQI3.70 × 10−42.40 × 10−41.72 × 10−28.46 × 10−41.15 × 10−31.29 × 10−34.31 × 10−36.25 × 10−31.07 × 10−22.25 × 10−54.59 × 10−38.20 × 10−21.29 × 10−1
sludge* ADD2.40 × 10−75.16 × 10−69.59 × 10−51.62 × 10−46.43 × 10−63.99 × 10−52.50 × 10−65.33 × 10−51.35 × 10−51.38 × 10−46.56 × 10−67.53 × 10−6
HQI1.20 × 10−65.16 × 10−33.20 × 10−14.04 × 10−34.59 × 10−57.97 × 10−37.14 × 10−41.33 × 10−12.70 × 10−32.29 × 10−42.19 × 10−49.42 × 10−25.65 × 10−1
roadside soil* ADD1.82 × 10−41.78 × 10−65.82 × 10−61.81 × 10−53.55 × 10−41.75 × 10−63.33 × 10−52.05 × 10−65.38 × 10−59.86 × 10−62.13 × 10−47.33 × 10−6
HQI9.11 × 10−41.78 × 10−31.94 × 10−24.53 × 10−42.54 × 10−33.51 × 10−49.50 × 10−35.12 × 10−31.08 × 10−21.64 × 10−57.10 × 10−39.16 × 10−21.50 × 10−1
Opoleroad dust*ADD7.81 × 10−54.52 × 10−77.67 × 10−65.00 × 10−52.78 × 10−44.42 × 10−62.60 × 10−54.89 × 10−65.23 × 10−51.14 × 10−52.00 × 10−48.29 × 10−6
HQI3.90 × 10−44.52 × 10−42.56 × 10−21.25 × 10−31.99 × 10−38.84 × 10−47.42 × 10−31.22 × 10−21.05 × 10−21.91 × 10−56.67 × 10−31.04 × 10−11.71 × 10−1
sludge* ADD8.84 × 10−55.48 × 10−77.26 × 10−65.86 × 10−52.96 × 10−44.04 × 10−63.12 × 10−54.86 × 10−68.97 × 10−51.36 × 10−52.08 × 10−47.47 × 10−6
HQI4.42 × 10−45.48 × 10−42.42 × 10−21.46 × 10−32.11 × 10−38.08 × 10−48.90 × 10−31.22 × 10−21.79 × 10−22.27 × 10−56.94 × 10−39.33 × 10−21.69 × 10−1
roadside soil* ADD1.36 × 10−49.59 × 10−75.07 × 10−61.97 × 10−53.05 × 10−41.99 × 10−62.38 × 10−52.95 × 10−64.23 × 10−58.70 × 10−61.58 × 10−46.71 × 10−6
HQI6.78 × 10−49.59 × 10−41.69 × 10−24.91 × 10−42.18 × 10−33.97 × 10−46.79 × 10−37.36 × 10−38.47 × 10−31.45 × 10−55.27 × 10−38.39 × 10−21.33 × 10−1
* ADD, * RfD (mg/kg body weight per day), HQI (unitless).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Adamiec, E. Road Environments: Impact of Metals on Human Health in Heavily Congested Cities of Poland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 697. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070697

AMA Style

Adamiec E. Road Environments: Impact of Metals on Human Health in Heavily Congested Cities of Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017; 14(7):697. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070697

Chicago/Turabian Style

Adamiec, Ewa. 2017. "Road Environments: Impact of Metals on Human Health in Heavily Congested Cities of Poland" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14, no. 7: 697. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070697

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop