Next Article in Journal
Serum Acetyl Cholinesterase as a Biomarker of Arsenic Induced Neurotoxicity in Sprague-Dawley Rats
Previous Article in Journal
Studies on the Development of Potential Biomarkers for Rapid Assessment of Copper Toxicity to Freshwater Fish using Esomus danricus as Model
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 2
Issue 1
10.3390/ijerph2005010074
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Metabolic Activation of the Tumorigenic Pyrrolizidine Alkaloid, Retrorsine, Leading to DNA Adduct Formation In Vivo

by
Yu-Ping Wang
*,
Peter P. Fu
and
Ming W. Chou
National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2005, 2(1), 74-79; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph2005010074
Submission received: 15 November 2004 / Accepted: 6 February 2005 / Published: 30 April 2005
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pyrrolizidine alkaloids are naturally occurring genotoxic chemicals produced by a large number of plants. The high toxicity of many pyrrolizidine alkaloids has caused considerable loss of free-ranging livestock due to liver and pulmonary lesions. Chronic exposure of toxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids to laboratory animals induces cancer. This investigation studies the metabolic activation of retrorsine, a representative naturally occurring tumorigenic pyrrolizidine alkaloid, and shows that a genotoxic mechanism is correlated to the tumorigenicity of retrorsine. Metabolism of retrorsine by liver microsomes of F344 female rats produced two metabolites, 6, 7-dihydro-7-hydroxy-1-hydroxymethyl-5H-pyrrolizine (DHP), at a rate of 4.8 ± 0.1 nmol/mg/min, and retrorsine-N-oxide, at a rate of 17.6±0.5 nmol/mg/min. Metabolism was enhanced 1.7-fold by using liver microsomes prepared from dexamethasone-treated rats. DHP formation was inhibited 77% and retrorsine N-oxide formation was inhibited 29% by troleandomycin, a P450 3A enzyme inhibitor. Metabolism of retrorsine with lung, kidney, and spleen microsomes from dexamethasone-treated rats also generated DHP and the N-oxide derivative. When rat liver microsomal metabolism of retrorsine occurred in the presence of calf thymus DNA, a set of DHP-derived DNA adducts was formed; these adducts were detected and quantified by using a previously developed 32P-postlabeling/HPLC method. These same DNA adducts were also found in liver DNA of rats gavaged with retrorsine. Since DHP-derived DNA adducts are suggested to be potential biomarkers of riddelliine-induced tumorigenicity, our results indicate that (i) similar to the metabolic activation of riddelliine, the mechanism of retrorsine-induced carcinogenicity in rats is also through a genotoxic mechanism involving DHP; and (ii) the set of DHP-derived DNA adducts found in liver DNA of rats gavaged with retrorsine or riddelliine can serve as biomarkers for the tumorigenicity induced by retronecine-type pyrrolizidine alkaloids.

Introduction

Pyrrolizidine alkaloids are common constituents of hundreds of plant species of different unrelated botanical families distributed in many geographical regions in the world (1–10). It has been reported that about 3% of the world’s flowering plants contain pyrrolizidine alkaloids (11). Pyrrolizidine alkaloids share a common chemical structure that consists of a necine-base and a necic acid moiety. The alkaloids with the necine base containing an unsaturated double bond at 1, 2-position, such as retronecine, heliotridine, and otonecine are the most toxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Among these, the retronecine-based pyrrolizidine alkaloids are abundant and their toxicities have been studied more extensively. Pyrrolizidine alkaloid per se is not toxic. Metabolic activation is required to form a pyrrolic metabolite to exert their toxicity. The high toxicity of many of pyrrolizidine alkaloid-containing plants has caused great loss of free-ranging livestock due to liver and pulmonary lesions. In addition, chronic exposure of toxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids to laboratory rats and mice induces tumors. Because of the concern of human exposure to genotoxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids, toxicity and carcinogenicity of riddelliine, a representative pyrrolizidine alkaloid, have been studied by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) conducted by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) (12); and the mechanism of the riddelliine-induced tumorigenicity in rats and mice was studied at the National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR) (13–16). Results of the mechanistic study showed that riddelliine was metabolized to form a reactive pyrrolic metabolite, 6, 7-dihydro-7-hydroxy-1-hydroxymethyl-5H-pyrrolizine (DHP), as well as riddelliine N-oxide (13). DHP bound to DNA in vitro and in vivo generated DHP-derived DNA adducts that were determined by the 32P-postlabeling/ HPLC analyses (14, 15). The levels of these DNA adduct formations correlate with the liver tumor potency of riddelliine (16) implying that the riddelliine-induced carcinogenesis is through a genotoxic mechanism.
Retrorsine is another representative retronecine-based pyrrolizidine alkaloid. Similar to riddelliine, retrorsine is a 12-membered macrocyclic diester pyrrolizidine alkaloid with an α, β-unsaturated double bond linked to the ester group at C-7 position of the retronecine base. The toxicity of retrorsine is due to the metabolic formation of the reactive pyrrolic metabolite (17, 18); however, the mechanism of retrorsine-induced tumorigenicity is not clear. Since retrorsine is structurally similar to that of riddelliine, it is important to know whether the genotoxic mechanism of riddelliine-induced tumorigenicity is also that of retrorsine. In this paper, we report results of the study on the metabolic activation of retrorsine. The detection of DHP-derived DNA adducts formation in liver DNA of rats treated with retrorsine indicates that the tumorigenicity of retrorsine is also through a genotoxic mechanism.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Retrorsine, retrorsine N-oxide and troleandomycin (triacetyloleandomycin, TAO) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). [γ-32P]Adenosine 5′-triphosphate ([32P] ATP) (sp. Act. >7,000 Ci/mmol) was purchased from ICN Biomedicals, Inc. (Costa Mesa, CA). Enzymes required for DNA hydrolysis and for 32P-postlabeling/HPLC analysis were purchased and used as previously described (14). DHP and the 3′-monophosphate of 7-(deoxyguanosine-N2-yl) dehydrosupinidine adducts (DHP-3′-dGMP) were prepared in our laboratory (14, 18). The liver microsomes of untreated rats (control microsomes) were prepared as previously described (13) and liver microsomes of female F344 rats pretreated with dexamthesasone (dosed daily with 75 mg dexamethasone/kg body weight intraperitoneally, for three consecutive days) were prepared similarly. Microsomes from rat lung, kidney, and spleen were also prepared similarly.

Animals and Treatment

Female F344 rats (3 per group) were obtained from the NCTR breeding colony as weanlings and maintained on a 12 h light-dark cycle. At 8 weeks of age, three animals/ treatment were dosed by oral gavages with retrorsine at 1.0 mg/kg/day in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH, 8.0) for three consecutive days. Control animals were gavaged with 0.1 M phosphate buffer only. Twenty-four hours after final dosing, the animals were euthanized by exposure to carbon dioxide and liver tissues were excised and stored at −80 ºC.

In vitro Metabolism of Retrorsine

Metabolism of retrorsine by control or dexamethasone-induced rat liver microsomes was performed in a 1.0 mL incubation volume containing 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.6), 5 mM magnesium chloride, 1 mM NADP+, 8 mM glucose 6-phosphate, 2 units glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase, 2 mg control-microsomes, and retrorsine (2 μmol in 50 μL DMSO) at 37ºC for 30 min. After the incubation, the mixture was centrifuged at 105,000 g for 30 min at 4 ºC to remove microsomal proteins. The supernatant fraction was collected and the resulting metabolite mixture was separated by reversed-phase HPLC employing two columns, a sample trap column (ODS, 4.6 × 30 mm) and an analytical column (Prodigy 5 μ ODS, 4.6 × 250 mm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA). A switching valve was equipped between the sample trap and analytical columns. The sample was first loaded on to the sample trap column and washed with 20 mM ammonium acetate buffer (buffer A) at the flow rate of 1 mL/min, so that the aqueous soluble impurities were directed to a waste bottle. After 5 min the sample trap column was switched to connect the analytical columns and the analysis was performed by eluting with linear gradient of buffer A to 50 % methanol in buffer A (buffer B) over 30 min followed by isocratic elution with buffer B for 25 min.
Metabolism of retrorsine by control or dexamethasone-induced microsomes from rat lung, kidney or spleen was similarly conducted, and the metabolites were similarly analyzed by HPLC. For enzyme inhibition study, metabolism of retrorsine was conducted in the presence of 100 μM TAO.

Preparation of DHP-Modified Calf thymus DNA

Purified calf thymus DNA (2.5 mg, 7.5 μmol) in 2.5 mL of 20 mM K2CO3 (pH 7.5) was reacted with 64 nmol of DHP at 37 ºC for 40 min. After incubation, the reaction mixture was extracted twice with 2.5 mL of a chloroform/isoamyl alcohol mixture (24/1, v/v). The DNA in aqueous phase was precipitated by adding 250 μL of 3 M sodium acetate followed by an equal volume of cold 2-propanol and washed with 70% ethanol. After the DNA was redissolved in 20 mM K2CO3 (pH 7.5), the DNA concentration and purity were analyzed spectrophotometrically. The DNA was stored at −78 ºC prior to 32P-postlabeling/HPLC analysis.

Metabolism of Retrorsine in the Presence of Calf Thymus DNA

The metabolism of retrorsine in the presence of calf thymus DNA (2.0 mg) was conducted in a 2 mL incubation volume with conditions similar to those for metabolism. After incubation, the reaction mixture was ultracentrifuged at 105,000 g for 30 min to remove the microsomal proteins. The clear supernatant was extracted twice with 2 ml of chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (v/v, 24/1). The DNA in the aqueous phase was precipitated and purified as described above.

Liver DNA Isolation

Liver DNA of rats gavaged with retrorsine or with only phosphate buffer was extracted using RecoverEase DNA Isolation Kit (Stratagene, Cedar Creek, TX) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and purity of DNA isolated from rat liver were analyzed spectrophotometrically. 32P-Postlabeling/HPLC analyses of DHP-derived DNA adducts 32P-Postlabeling/HPLC analysis was conducted as described previously (13, 14). For quantitation of each sample, the two epimeric DHP-3′-dGMP synthetic standards, in an amount that closely matched the range of modification in the liver DNA samples, were also analyzed in parallel. Statistical comparisons were conducted by analysis of variance by Student’s t-test.

Results

In vitro Metabolism of retrorsine by liver microsomes Figure 1 shows the chromatographic profile of reversed-phase HPLC analysis of the in vitro retrorsine metabolism. The chromatographic peak that eluted at 43.6 min contained the recovered substrate, retrorsine. By comparison of HPLC retention times and UV-visible absorption with those of the DHP and retrorsine N-oxide standards (14, 19), the metabolites contained in chromatographic peaks eluting at 25.8 and 34.5 min were identified as DHP and retrorsine N-oxide, respectively (Figure 1).
Since the chromatographic peaks eluted prior to 22 min were also detected from the incubation with liver microsomes pre-heated for 10 min, these chromatographic peaks did not contain metabolites of retrorsine. Similar HPLC profiles of the metabolism of retrorsine by liver microsomes of rats treated with dexamethasone conducted under similar conditions were also obtained. The rate of DHP formation from metabolism of retrorsine by dexamethasone -microsomes was about 1.7-fold higher than that by control-microsomes (Table 1).
To determine whether or not P450 3A is the principal metabolizing enzyme that catalyzes metabolism of retrorsine to DHP and retrorsine N-oxide, metabolism of retrorsine by rat liver control and dexamethasone-microsomes was conducted in the presence TAO, a specific P450 3A inhibitor. It was found that DHP formation were 77 and 67% reduced, respectively, compared with the metabolism by control and dexamethasone-induced microsomes without TAO (Table 1). Retrorsine N-oxide formation in control and dexamethasone-microsomal metabolism was reduced by 30 and 29%.

In Vitro Metabolism by Extrahepatic Tissue Microsomes

The quantifications of DHP and retrorsine N-oxide from the in vitro metabolism of retrorsine mediated by the microsomal fractions of extrahepatic tissues, lung, kidney and spleen of rats treated with dexamethasone are shown in Table 2. Compared to the retrorsine metabolism by liver microsomes from control rats, the retrorsine metabolizing enzyme activities in the extrahepatic tissues from dexamethasone-induced rats were much lower; the DHP and N-oxide formation by the microsomal fractions obtained from the extrahepatic tissues of control rats were even lower (data not shown).

DHP-Derived DNA Adduct Formation

Rat liver microsomal metabolism of retrorsine in the presence of calf thymus DNA was assayed and the resulting DNA adducts were analyzed by 32P-postlabeling/HPLC. Metabolism of riddelliine in the presence of calf thymus DNA was performed in parallel to determine DNA adducts identification. As previously determined (13–15), female F344 rats fed riddelliine produced a set of eight DHP-derived DNA adducts in liver that were identical to the adduct peaks obtained from the 32P-postlabeling/HPLC analysis of DHP-modified calf thymus DNA (Figure 2A). These eight DHP-derived DNA adducts contained in the chromatographic peaks eluted at 47.6, 48.3, 51.4, 53.9, 55.3, 60.1, 61.0, and 62.6 min are designated as P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, and P8, respectively. The DNA adducts designated as P4 and P6 are DHP-3′-dGMP adducts (13, 14) and the other six DHP-derived adducts (P1, P2, P3, P5, P7, and P8) were characterized as DHP-derived dinucleotides (15). A similar HPLC profile was also obtained from the in vitro metabolism of retrorsine in the presence of calf thymus DNA (Figure 2B). Figure 2C shows the same eight DHP-derived DNA adducts formed from liver DNA of rats gavaged with retrorsine. The level of DNA adducts of retrorsine in liver of rats receiving three daily doses (1 mg/kg/day) is 110.3±18.0 adducts/107 nucleotides.

Discussion

Retrorsine exhibits a variety of toxic responses, including acute toxicity, mutagenicity, DNA cross-linking in cultured bovine kidney epithelial cells in the presence of an external metabolizing system (20), and clastogenic activity (21). Metabolism of retrorsine in vitro and in vivo formed isatinecic acid, pyrrolic metabolites, retrorsine N-oxide, and retronecine (17, 22, 23). Similar to riddelline, retrorsine and retrorsine-containing plants induced liver tumors in rats (24).
CYP 3A was found to be the major isozyme for metabolizing monocrotaline and senecionine (25, 26). The inhibition of the DHP formation in the metabolism of retrorsine by TAO (Table 1) indicates that the metabolic formation of DHP was primarily catalyzed by CYP 3A enzyme. This finding is consistent with our previous report that metabolism of riddelliine by liver microsomes of female F344 rats is mainly catalyzed by CYP 3A. Xia et al. (27) performed a comparative study on the metabolism of riddelliine by human and rat liver microsomes and also found that the DHP and riddelliine N-oxide were the major metabolites of riddelliine in an in vitro human microsomal incubation, with the levels comparable to those obtained from rat liver microsomal metabolism. Dexamethasone is not only a potent rat liver CYP3A inducer that induces 1.7-fold rat liver retrorsine metabolizing enzyme activity but also induced microsomal retrorsine-metabolizing enzyme activity in lung, kidney and spleen. The CYP3A activity in the extrahepatic tissues of uninduced rats was very low; in fact, under our experimental conditions (2 mg microsomal protein, 30 min incubation) the DHP and retrorsine N-oxide were hardly detected. However, using dexamethasone-induced lung, kidney, or spleen microsomes, we were able to determine the formation of DHP and retrorsine N-oxide. The levels of metabolism by extrahepatic tissue microsomes from the dexamethasone-induced rats were 18 to 32-fold lower than the metabolism of retrorsine by control liver microsomes.
We have previously found that the DHP-derived DNA adducts are formed in liver of male and female F344 rats fed riddelliine. The levels of the DHP-derived DNA adducts in liver DNA of rats treated with riddelliine correlated with the liver tumor incidence indicating the DHP-derived DNA adducts that are responsible for riddelliine-induced liver tumorigenicity (15); this riddelliine-induced tumorigenesis is mediated through a genotoxic mechanism. The current study shows the similar set of DHP-derived DNA adducts that was found in the liver DNA of rats treated with retrorsine and indicates the retrorsine-induced tumorigenesis may be also due to a genotoxic mechanism. The formation of these DNA adducts from retrorsine metabolism suggests that these DHP-derived DNA adducts are responsible for retrorsine-induced liver tumorigenicity as well as the other genotoxicities. Based on the results reported in this study and published previously (13), these DHP-derived DNA adducts are potential biomarkers of pyrrolizidine alkaloid-induced tumorigenicity.
Based on the present findings, we propose that the metabolic activation of retrorsine leads to the formation of DHP-derived DNA adducts and liver tumors (Figure 3). The pyrrolic metabolite, dehydroretrorsine, can (i) bind to cellular DNA followed with hydrolysis to form the DHP-derived DNA adducts, or (ii) be hydrolyzed to form DHP followed by reaction with DNA to form the DHP-derived DNA adducts (Figure 3). Our results show that DHP is the common reactive metabolite generated by the retronecine-type pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Consequently, the formation of DHP-derived DNA adducts may well be important biomarkers for exposure to pyrrolizidine alkaloids.
Ijerph 02 00074f1 1024
Figure 1. Reversed-phased HPLC analysis of metabolites formed from metabolism of retrorsine. For the conditions for HPLC analysis see Materials and Methods.
Figure 1. Reversed-phased HPLC analysis of metabolites formed from metabolism of retrorsine. For the conditions for HPLC analysis see Materials and Methods.
Ijerph 02 00074f1
Ijerph 02 00074f2 1024
Figure 2. 32P-Postlabeling/HPLC analysis of DHP-derived DNA adducts formed from (A) DHP-modified calf thymus DNA, (B) calf thymus DNA incubated with the in vitro metabolism of retrorsine, and (C) liver DNA of rats gavaged with retrorsine. The eight chromatographic peaks eluted at 47.6, 48.3, 51.4, 53.9, 55.3, 60.1, 61.0, and 62.6 min are the identified DHP-derived DNA adducts designated as P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7 and P8, respectively. For the conditions for 32P-postlabeling/HPLC analysis see Materials and Methods.
Figure 2. 32P-Postlabeling/HPLC analysis of DHP-derived DNA adducts formed from (A) DHP-modified calf thymus DNA, (B) calf thymus DNA incubated with the in vitro metabolism of retrorsine, and (C) liver DNA of rats gavaged with retrorsine. The eight chromatographic peaks eluted at 47.6, 48.3, 51.4, 53.9, 55.3, 60.1, 61.0, and 62.6 min are the identified DHP-derived DNA adducts designated as P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7 and P8, respectively. For the conditions for 32P-postlabeling/HPLC analysis see Materials and Methods.
Ijerph 02 00074f2
Ijerph 02 00074f3 1024
Figure 3. The proposed metabolic activation and detoxification pathways of retrorsine.
Figure 3. The proposed metabolic activation and detoxification pathways of retrorsine.
Ijerph 02 00074f3
Table
Table 1. Quantification of DHP and PA N-oxide formation in an in vitro PA metabolism by rat liver microsomes
Table 1. Quantification of DHP and PA N-oxide formation in an in vitro PA metabolism by rat liver microsomes
Control-microsomesDexamethasone-microsomes
SubstrateDHP (nmol/mg/min)N-oxide (nmol/mg/min)DHP (nmol/mg/min)N-oxide (nmol/mg/min)
Retrorsine4.8±0.11,217.6±0.51,38.3±0.21,225.1±0.91,3
Retrorsine + TAO1.1±0.04112.4±0.612.7±0.7117.7±0.91
Data represent the mean ±SD (n=3). For experimental details, see Materials and Methods.
1Statistically significant difference (p<0.01) between groups in the same column.
2,3Statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between groups in the same row.
Table
Table 2. Quantification of DHP and retrorsine N-oxide formation in an in vitro PA metabolism with lung, kidney, and spleen microsomes from the rats pretreated with dexamethasone
Table 2. Quantification of DHP and retrorsine N-oxide formation in an in vitro PA metabolism with lung, kidney, and spleen microsomes from the rats pretreated with dexamethasone
MicrosomesDHP (pmol/mg/min)Retrorsine N-oxide (pmol/mg/min)
Lung510 ± 40727 ± 26
Kidney79 ± 3627 ± 6
Spleen128 ± 6702 ± 39
Data represent the mean ±SD (n=3).
For experimental details, see Materials and Methods.

Acknowledgement

This research was supported in part by appointment (Y.W.) to the Postgraduate Research Program at the NCTR administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and the FDA.

References

  1. Bull, L. B.; Culvenor, C. C.; Dick, A. J. The pyrrolizidine alkaloids, their chemistry, pathogenicity and other biological properties; North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1968. [Google Scholar]
  2. International Agency for Research in Cancer (IARC), Pyrrolizidine alkaloids. In IARC Monograph on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk of chemicals to man - Some naturally occurring substance; International Agency for Research in Cancer: Lyon, France, 1976.
  3. Mattocks, A. R. Chemistry and Toxicology of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids; London, New York: Academic Press, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  4. Woo, Y. T.; Lai, D. Y.; Arcos, J. C.; Argus, M. F. Chemical Induction of Cancer; Academic Press Inc: San Diego, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  5. International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS), Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids Health and Safety Guide. In Health and Safety Criteria Guide 26; WHO: Geneva, 1989.
  6. Roeder, E. Medicinal Plans in Europe Containing Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids. Pharmazie 1995, 50(2), 83–98. [Google Scholar]
  7. Stegelmeier, B. L.; Edgar, J. A.; Colegate, S. M.; Gardner, D. R.; Schoch, T. K.; Coulombe, R. A., Jr.; Molyneux, R. J. Pyrrolizidine Alkaloid Plants, Metabolism and Toxicity. J. Nat. Toxins 1999, 8(1), 95–116. [Google Scholar]
  8. Coulombe, R. A., Jr.; Drew, G. L.; Stermitz, F. R. Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids Crosslink DNA with Actin. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol 1999, 154, 198–202. [Google Scholar]
  9. Steenkamp, V.; Stewart, M. J.; Zuckerman, M. Clinical and Analytical Aspects of Pyrrolizidine Poisoning Caused by South African Traditional Medicine. Ther. Drug Monit 2000, 22(3), 302–306. [Google Scholar]
  10. Fu, P. P.; Chou, M. W.; Xia, Q.; Yang, Y. C.; Yan, J.; Doerge, D. R.; Chan, P. C. Genotoxic Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids and Pyrrolizidine Alkaloid N-oxides-Mechanism Leading to DNA Adduct Formation and Tumorgenicity. Environ. Carcinogen Ecotoxicol. Rev 2001, 19, 353–385. [Google Scholar]
  11. Smith, L. W.; Culvenor, C. C. Plant Sources of Hepatotoxic Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids. J. Nat. Prod 1981, 44(2), 129–152. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chan, P. C. NTP Technical Report on Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Riddelliine in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice. NTP TR 2001, 508. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang, Y. C.; Yan, J.; Doerge, D. R.; Chan, P. C.; Fu, P. P.; Chou, M. W. Metabolic Activation of the Tumorgenic Pyrrolizidine Alkaloid, Riddelliine, Leading to DNA adduct Formation in Vivo. Chem. Res. Toxicol 2001, 14(1), 101–109. [Google Scholar]
  14. Yang, Y. C.; Yan, J.; Churchwell, M.; Beger, R.; Chan, P.; Doerge, D. R.; Fu, P. P.; Chou, M. W. Development of 32P-Postlabeling/ HPLC method for Detection of Dehydroretronecine-Derived DNA Adduct in Vitro and in Vivo. Chem. Res. Toxicol 2001, 14(1), 91–100. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chou, M. W.; Yan, J.; Williams, L.; Xia, Q.; Churchwell, M.; Doerge, D. R.; Fu, P. P. Identification of DNA Adduct Derived from Riddelliine, a Carcinogenic Pyrrolizidine Alkaloid. Chem. Res. Toxicol 2003, 16(9), 1130–1137. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chou, M. W.; Yan, J.; Nichols, J.; Xia, Q.; Beland, F. A.; Chan, P. C.; Fu, P. P. Correlation of DNA Adduct Formation and Riddelliine-induced Liver Tumorigenesis in F344 Rats and B6C3F1 Mice. Cancer Lett 2003, 193(2), 119–125. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chu, P. S.; Lame, M. W.; Segall, H. J. In Vivo Metabolism of Retrorsine and Retrorsine-N-oxide. Arch Toxicol 1993, 67(1), 39–43. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mattocks, A. R.; White, I. N. Toxic Effects and Pyrrolic Metabolites in the Liver of Young Rats Given the Pyrrolizidine Alkaloid Retrorsine. Chem-Biol. Interactions 1973, 6(5), 297–306. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chou, M. W.; Wang, Y. P.; Yan, J.; Yang, Y. C.; Beger, R.; Williams, L. D.; Doerge, D. R.; Fu, P. P. Riddelliine N-oxide is a Photochemical and Mammalian Metabolite with Genotoxic Activity That is Comparable to the Parent Pyrrolizidine Alkaloid Riddelliine. Toxicol. Lett 2003, 145(3), 239–247. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hincks, J. R.; Kim, H. Y.; Segall, H. J.; Molyneux, R. J.; Stermitz, F. R.; Coulombe, R. A., Jr. DNA Cross-linking in Mammalian Cells by Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids, Structure-Activity Relationships. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1991, 111(1), 90–98. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kedzierskiand, B.; Buhler, D. R. The Formation of 6,7-dihydro-7-hydroxy-1-hydroxymethyl-5H-pyrrolizine, a Metabolite of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids. Anal Biochem 1986, 152(1), 59–65. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chan, M. Y.; Zhao, X. L.; Ogle, C. W. A Comparative Study on the Hepatic Toxicity and Metabolism of Crotalaria Assamica and Eupatorium Species. Am J Chin Med 1989, 17(3–4), 165–170. [Google Scholar]
  23. Couet, C. E.; Hopley, J.; Hanley, A. B. Metabolic Activation of Pyrrolizdine Alkaloids by Human, Rat and Avocado Microsomes. Toxicon 1996, 34(9), 1058–1061. [Google Scholar]
  24. Schoental, R.; Head, M. A.; Peacock, P. R. Senecio Alkaloids: a Primary Liver Tumours in Rats as a Results of Treatment with (1) A Mixture of Alkaloids from S. Jakabae Lin; (2) Retrorsine; (3) Isatidine. Br. J. Cancer 1954, 8(3), 458–465. [Google Scholar]
  25. Reid, M. J.; Lame, M. W.; Morin, D.; Wilson, D. W.; Segall, H. J. Involvement of Cytochrome P450 3A in the Metabolism and Covalent Binding of 14C-Monocrotaline in Rats Liver Microsomes. J. Biochem Mol Toxicol 1998, 12(3), 157–166. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chung, W. G.; Buhler, D. R. The Effect of Spironolacton Treatment on the Cytochome P450-mediated Metabolism of the Pyrrolizidine Alkaloid Senecionine by Hepatic Microsomes from Rats and Guinea Pigs. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol 1994, 127(2), 314–319. [Google Scholar]
  27. Xia, Q.; Chou, M. W.; Kadlubar, F. F.; Chan, P. C.; Fu, P. P. Human Liver Microsomal Metabolism and DNA Adduct Formation of Tumorigenic Pyrrolizidine Alkaloid, Riddelliine. Chem Res Toxicol 2003, 16(1), 66–73. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.-P.; Fu, P.P.; Chou, M.W. Metabolic Activation of the Tumorigenic Pyrrolizidine Alkaloid, Retrorsine, Leading to DNA Adduct Formation In Vivo. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2005, 2, 74-79. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph2005010074

AMA Style

Wang Y-P, Fu PP, Chou MW. Metabolic Activation of the Tumorigenic Pyrrolizidine Alkaloid, Retrorsine, Leading to DNA Adduct Formation In Vivo. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2005; 2(1):74-79. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph2005010074

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yu-Ping, Peter P. Fu, and Ming W. Chou. 2005. "Metabolic Activation of the Tumorigenic Pyrrolizidine Alkaloid, Retrorsine, Leading to DNA Adduct Formation In Vivo" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2, no. 1: 74-79. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph2005010074

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop