Next Article in Journal
Control Method Based on Demand Response Needs of Isolated Bus Regulation with Series-Resonant Converters for Residential Photovoltaic Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Implementation of Low-Power Analog-to-Information Conversion for Environmental Information Perception
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Measurement of Soot Volume Fraction and Temperature for Oxygen-Enriched Ethylene Combustion Based on Flame Image Processing

1
School of Electrical and Power Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, No. 1, Daxue Road, Xuzhou 221116, China
2
Key Laboratory of Gas and Fire Control for Coal Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, No. 1, Daxue Road, Xuzhou 221116, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2017, 10(6), 750; https://doi.org/10.3390/en10060750
Submission received: 27 March 2017 / Revised: 28 April 2017 / Accepted: 18 May 2017 / Published: 27 May 2017

Abstract

:
A method for simultaneously visualizing the two-dimensional distributions of temperature and soot volume fraction in an ethylene flame was presented. A single-color charge-coupled device (CCD) camera was used to capture the flame image in the visible spectrum considering the broad-response spectrum of the R and G bands of the camera. The directional emissive power of the R and G bands were calibrated and used for measurement. Slightly increased temperatures and reduced soot concentration were predicted in the central flame without self-absorption effects considered, an iterative algorithm was used for eliminating the effect of self-absorption. Nine different cases were presented in the experiment to demonstrate the effects of fuel mass flow rate and oxygen concentration on temperature and soot concentration in three different atmospheres. For ethylene combustion in pure-air atmosphere, as the fuel mass flow rate increased, the maximum temperature slightly decreased, and the maximum soot volume fraction slightly increased. For oxygen fractions of 30%, 40%, and 50% combustion in O2/N2 oxygen-enhanced atmospheres, the maximum flame temperatures were 2276, 2451, and 2678 K, whereas combustion in O2/CO2 atmospheres were 1916, 2322, and 2535 K. The maximum soot volume fractions were 4.5, 7.0, and 9.5 ppm in oxygen-enriched O2/N2 atmosphere and 13.6, 15.3, and 14.8 ppm in oxygen-enriched O2/CO2 atmosphere. Compared with the O2/CO2 atmosphere, combustion in the oxygen-enriched O2/N2 atmosphere produced higher flame temperature and larger soot volume fraction. Preliminary results indicated that this technique is reliable and can be used for combustion diagnosis.

1. Introduction

Numerous thermal power plants in China use coal as fuel. When dealing with technologies related to coal combustion, particulate removal and CO2 reduction have to be considered. A potential technique for CO2 capture is oxy-combustion of coal. O2/CO2 combustion is a process of burning coal in a mixture of oxygen and recycled flue gas, generating a CO2-concentrated sequestration-ready flue gas [1,2]. Success in the implementation of O2/CO2 combustion in coal-fired boilers depends on understanding the differences after the replacement of N2 with CO2. The difference in the thermal properties of N2 and CO2 renders O2/CO2 combustion significantly different from air combustion. Therefore, CO2 participates in the chemical reaction and affects the combustion characteristics, altering the flame temperature, soot, and NOx formation [3,4,5,6]. Knowledge of the temperatures and soot concentrations in soot flames can provide valuable information to elucidate the processes involved in soot production.
The optical pyrometer has proven to be a practical measurement technique that can provide the distributions of flame temperatures and soot volume fractions in diffusion flames. Two-dimensional (2-D) distributions of soot volume fraction in hydrocarbon flames can be obtained by light extinction [7,8,9], and 2-color pyrometry combined with laser-induced incandescence (LII) has been proposed by Snelling et al. [10] for measurements of absolute soot volume fraction. Kotzagianni et al. [11] applied laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) for uniform methane–air mixtures spanning a wide range of compositions and for turbulent non-premixed and premixed flames. Flame image processing techniques based on a digital camera used for pyrometric measurements have been used to measure flame temperature and radiative properties [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. In a previous study [18], a color digital camera was used to capture the flame image in visible spectrum. With consideration of the broad response spectrum of the R, G, and B bands of the camera, the directional radiative intensity of the R and G bands were calibrated and used to reconstruct the 2-D distributions of temperature and soot volume fraction of the flame by solving the radiative transfer equation.
In the present study, the inversion of the 2-D distributions of temperature and soot volume fraction from visible flame images obtained with a digital camera is experimentally investigated considering the effect of self-absorption. Meanwhile, a high-resolution lens was used, the flame images of different flame height were composited together using image processing techniques, and the results of the high-resolution measurement were obtained. A co-flow laminar diffusion flame burner under atmospheric pressure was designed to generate ethylene flames in pure air, O2/N2, and O2/CO2 oxygen-enhanced atmospheres. First, flame radiation spectrum and color flame images in different combustion conditions were captured and analyzed. Subsequently, the effect of fuel flow rate and oxygen concentration on temperature and soot concentration in the three different atmospheres was discussed.

2. Measurement Principle

The measurement of temperature and soot volume fraction is based on the radiative emission from a soot particle, and the line-of-sight radiative intensity is determined by soot, which emits and absorbs radiation:
I λ = 0 l f κ λ ( l ) I b , λ ( l ) exp [ l l f κ λ ( l ) d l ] d l
where I b , λ ( l ) = 2 π h c 2 / λ 5 ( e h c / λ k T ( l ) 1 ) is the monochromatic blackbody radiative intensity, c is the speed of light, h is Planck’s constant, k is the Boltzmann constant. κ λ is the absorption coefficient (m−1). κ λ ( l ) I b , λ ( l ) is defined as the spectral emission source term, and exp [ l l f κ λ ( l ) d l ] is the self-absorption term. A color CCD camera is used to obtain flame images in visible spectrum. The R, G, and B data of the flame images represent the relative radiation intensities of the flame. A blackbody furnace is used to calibrate the relationship between the absolute radiation intensity and the raw R, G, and B data of the image obtained by the camera [18], which will be described in a later section. With consideration of the spectral response of the camera, the absolute radiation intensity obtained by the camera from the flame can be expressed as follows:
E i = λ 1 λ 2 η i , λ I λ d λ = λ 1 λ 2 η i , λ 0 l f κ λ ( l ) I b , λ ( l ) exp [ l l f κ λ ( l ) d l ] d l d λ
where i = ( R , G , B ) , and η i , λ is the relative spectral response efficiency of the camera, and the method used to obtain the spectral characterization of the camera is described in a subsequent section.
To determine the local temperatures T ( l ) and the soot spectral absorption coefficient κ λ ( l ) , Equation (2) is rewritten as:
E i = 0 l f λ 1 λ 2 η i , λ κ λ ( l ) I b , λ ( l ) exp [ l l f κ λ ( l ) d l ] d λ d l = 0 l f H i ( l ) exp [ l l f κ λ ( l ) d l ] d l
where H i ( l ) = λ 1 λ 2 η i , λ κ λ ( l ) I b , λ ( l ) d λ is the emission source term, and exp [ l l f κ λ ( l ) d l ] represents the self-absorption term.
The self-absorption effect is disregarded during the initial calculation; thus, Equation (3) can be written as:
E R = 0 l f H R ( l ) d l E G = 0 l f H G ( l ) d l
In the current study, Tikhonov regularization similar to that in the literature [15,22,23] is used to reconstruct H R ( l ) and H G ( l ) . After H R ( l ) and H G ( l ) are obtained, the local flame temperatures and the soot absorption coefficients can be derived from the ratio of H R ( l ) to H G ( l ) , as shown below:
H R ( l ) H G ( l ) = λ 1 λ 2 η R , λ κ λ ( λ ) I b λ ( λ , T ) d λ λ 3 λ 4 η G , λ κ λ ( λ ) I b λ ( λ , T ) d λ = λ 1 λ 2 η R , λ κ λ ( λ ) 2 π h c 2 / λ 5 ( e h c / λ k T ( l ) 1 ) d λ λ 3 λ 4 η G , λ κ λ ( λ ) 2 π h c 2 / λ 5 ( e h c / λ k T ( l ) 1 ) d λ
According to the Rayleigh approximation, the soot volume fraction with its spectral absorption coefficient is estimated as follows [24,25]:
f v = κ λ λ / ( 6 π E ( m ) )
where E ( m ) is a function of the real and imaginary parts of the refractive index m , expressed as:
E ( m ) = Im | m 2 1 m 2 + 2 | = 6 n k ( n 2 k 2 + 2 ) 2 + 4 n 2 k 2
E ( m ) is typically regarded as a constant independent of the wavelength [18,24,25] with a magnitude of 0.26 in the visible region.
Considering Equation (6) and H i ( l ) = λ 1 λ 2 η i , λ κ λ ( l ) I b , λ ( l ) d λ , the emission source terms H R ( l ) and H R ( l ) can be rewritten as:
H R ( l ) = λ 1 λ 2 η R , λ f v ( l ) 6 π E ( m ) λ I b , λ ( l ) d λ H G ( l ) = λ 3 λ 4 η G , λ f v ( l ) 6 π E ( m ) λ I b , λ ( l ) d λ
Thus, Equation (5) can be expressed as follows:
H R ( l ) H G ( l ) = λ 1 λ 2 η R , λ E ( m ) λ 2 π h c 2 / λ 5 ( e h c / λ k T ( l ) 1 ) d λ λ 3 λ 4 η G , λ E ( m ) λ 2 π h c 2 / λ 5 ( e h c / λ k T ( l ) 1 ) d λ
Equation (9) contains only one unknown T ( l ) , which can be solved using the Newton-type iterative algorithm. After the temperatures T ( l ) are obtained, the soot volume fractions f v ( l ) can be calculated from Equation (8), and the absorption coefficient κ λ ( l ) can be expressed using Equation (6).
Notably, κ λ ( l ) and T ( l ) are intermediate computational results; the self-absorption term exp [ l l f κ λ ( l ) d l ] is disregarded. In the current study, the self-absorption effect is corrected using the method similar to that in Ref. [24] in multi-wavelength emission tomography for flame temperature and soot volume fraction measurements. The self-absorption term exp [ l l f κ λ ( l ) d l ] can be obtained after κ λ ( l ) is determined, and Equation (3) can be expressed as a matrix equation:
E R = Δ l × H self × H R = Δ l × H R E G = Δ l × H self × H G = Δ l × H G
where Δ l is the length of the path, H self is the self-absorption term, Δ l is the updated length of the path that the self-absorption term considers. The reconstructed emission source terms H R and H G can be updated using another instance of Tikhonov regularization, and the updated T ( l ) and κ λ ( l ) can be recalculated by solving Equations (6), (8), and (9). After several iterations, the absorption coefficient κ λ ( l ) and the temperature T ( l ) are finally calculated to reach convergence so that the self-absorption effect is considered. The whole solution procedure to simultaneously reconstruct 2-D distributions of temperature and soot volume fraction is shown in Figure 1.

3. Measurement Algorithms Validated by Simulation

To validate the performance of the proposed measurement method, some measurement simulations of a fictitious flame with a given temperature and a soot volume fraction were conducted. The temperature of flame and soot volume fraction was measurement by flame emission spectrum taken from Ref. [24]. The relative spectral response of the CCD camera was simply expressed by a Gaussian function during simulation, and by using Equation (2), the absolute radiation intensity of the flames E R and E G could be obtained, as shown in Figure 2.
The reconstructed emission source terms H R and H G could be calculated using E R and E G , respectively, on the basis of Tikhonov regularization. The initial values of T ( l ) and f v ( l ) could be obtained in accordance with Equations (6), (8), and (9), and those intermediate results of T ( l ) and f v ( l ) could be used for iterative calculation later. The solution reached convergence as iterations increased, and the convergence value was the final result. In the current study, the convergence was evaluated using | Δ f v | , and the iterations were considered to be completed if | Δ f v | 0.001 . These changes in the value of the soot volume fraction at a height of 30 mm during iterative calculation are shown in Figure 3.
As shown in Figure 3, the calculation value of the soot volume fraction quickly approximates the real value after only one iteration, and the difference between the soot volume fraction calculated using the iterative algorithm and the soot volume fraction in the real-life scenario is not discernible after five iterations. Figure 4 shows the results of the comparison when self-absorption effects are considered and disregarded.
As shown in Figure 4, both the temperature and the soot volume fraction can be reconstructed accurately when the self-absorption term is considered. The calculation errors of the temperature and the soot volume fraction increase gradually near the center of the flame when the self-absorption term is disregarded. Without the self-absorption term considered, the temperature decreases but the soot volume fraction increases in the central flame. At the flame height of 30 mm, the relative errors in the calculation of the temperature and the soot volume fraction were 3% and 23%, respectively. Thus, the reconstructed results were affected by the self-absorption term and must thus be considered. With the aforementioned results, the performance of the proposed method of flame measurement was proven.

4. Experimental Setup and Calibration

4.1. Experimental Setup

The schematics for burners and experimental equipment is shown in Figure 5. The co-flow burner is similar to the one designed by the National Research Council Canada. The burner consists of a fuel tube with an inner diameter of 10.9 mm, centered in an oxidizer nozzle with an inner diameter of 88 mm and an outer diameter of 100 mm. Electronic mass flow controllers (Type: Sevenstar CS230, Sevenstar Electronics Mass Flow Meter Branch, Beijing, China) with a long-term accuracy of ±1.0% S.P. (≥35% F.S.) governed the flow rates of all gases, and these gases are delivered at room temperature and atmospheric pressure (294 K, 1 atm). Axisymmetric laminar diffusion ethylene flames in pure air, O2/N2, and O2/CO2 oxygen-enhanced atmospheres were generated by the burner. Figure 6 presents a photo of the experimental setup. Table 1 summarizes the flow rate of gases in the nine different cases. The adiabatic flame temperatures in Table 1 were calculated using CHEMKIN PRO (ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA).
The visible flames were captured using a digital camera (Type: Manta G-504, Allied Vision Technologies, Stadtroda, Germany). The camera has a Sony ICX655 sensor (Sony Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) to receive R, G, and B data. The size of the sensor is 2/3 inch with about one million effective pixels (1226 × 1028). Flame images were saved in a 12-bit lossless compressed raw format. To improve the camera resolution, a special telecentric lens (Type: Computar TEC-55, Computar, Tokyo, Japan) with an effective aperture of 33.0 mm was used. The distance between the camera lens and the nozzle center of the burner was 14 cm. In this situation, nearly only the parallel incident light was able to enter the lens, and the barrel distortion of the image was relatively weak. The resolution of the flame image was 64 pixels/mm. To capture the whole flame, the camera was placed on the platform lift, 20 frame flame images were captured at each flame height, and the whole flame image could be obtained by image processing techniques. Figure 7 shows five flame images with different heights and a single composite image.

4.2. Calibrations of the Digital Color Camera

Consumer digital cameras are not specifically designed to be used as scientific detectors. To further characterize the cameras, calibration was required. In a previous study on image processing techniques, the R, G, and B data of a pixel in the color digital camera are not proportional to the monochromatic radiative intensities because of the broad spectral response spectra of the R, G, and B bands of the color camera [16,17,18,19]. To characterize the relative spectral response of the camera, an experiment similar to Ref. [26] was performed. As shown in Figure 8a, the light source is a 1000 W xenon lamp (Type: OBB Tunable KiloArc, HORIBA Group, Kyoto, Japan), the monochromatic light is obtained with a monochromator, and the light from the monochromator is coupled through a diffuser for the light to be as uniform as possible. The monochromatic light was imaged onto the camera in the visible spectrum of 380–800 nm (negligibly sensitive to non-visible wavelengths for the camera used). The bandwidths of every wavelength are set to 2 nm, although this is not sufficiently narrow for an optical bandwidth. However, this width can sufficiently characterize the relative spectral response of the camera. To obtain sufficiently detailed relative spectral response sensitivity curves, 85 images were taken at each wavelength in steps of 5 nm. Figure 8b shows the typical monochromatic radiation image. Meanwhile, a detector (Trap M), in addition to the camera, whose relative spectral response curves was known, was used to capture monochromatic images controlled by the computer. By using the method described in Ref. [26], the relative spectral response of the camera was obtained. Figure 9 shows the results for the camera (Type: Manta G-504) with lens (Type: Computer TEC-55, Computar, Tokyo, Japan).
A blackbody furnace (Type: Mikron Model M330) with a temperature range of 300 °C to 1700 °C (temperature uncertainty 0.25% of reading ±1 °C) was used to calibrate the directional emissive powers and the raw data of the R and G bands of the camera, as shown in Figure 10. The variations of log ( E R ) and log ( E G ) with log ( R / e x p o s u r e   t i m e ) and log ( G / e x p o s u r e   t i m e ) , respectively, are shown in Figure 11.

5. Experimental Results and Analysis

The flame images of ethylene combustion in nine different cases are shown in Figure 12. Notably, these images represent the unsaturated flame images, which were used for reconstructing the flame temperature and soot volume fraction. The exposure times were as follows: case1 to case3, 65 , 000   μ s ; case4 to case9, 28 , 000   μ s , 12 , 000   μ s , 8500   μ s , 60 , 000   μ s , 15 , 000   μ s , 8500   μ s , respectively.

5.1. Pure Air Atmosphere

Case1 to case3 were flame combustion in different fuel flux in pure air atmosphere. The maximum temperatures and soot volume fraction from case1 to case9 are summarized in Table 2. The condition of case3 was similar to that in the literature [24,27]. The C2H4 fuel flow rate was set to the smoke point, 194 mL/min (21 °C, 1 atm), and the air co-flow was set to 284 L/min. The maximum soot volume fraction of soot was about 7.8 ppm, and the maximum flame temperature was about 2058 K. The profiles of the temperature and soot volume fraction in the present study were in good agreement with Ref. [24,27], as shown in Figure 13. The detailed 2-D distribution of temperature and soot volume fraction for case1 is shown in Figure 14. The measurement results for case1 to case3 are shown in Figure 15. Theoretical calculations as those in Table 2 revealed that the adiabatic flame temperature of the three tested cases was equal to 2369.0 K; however, the actual flame temperature was determined by both the chemical reaction heat and the radiant heat. The flame length increased with fuel flow, and soot formation was enhanced because of a lack of oxygen, causing an increase in radiant heat loss. Therefore, the maximum temperature of case1 was higher than that in case2 and case3. Table 2 also shows that the maximum soot volume fractions of case1 and case2 are less than that of case3 because case3 was a smoke point; the incomplete burning is enhanced as fuel flow increases owing to lack of oxygen.

5.2. O2/N2 Oxygen-Enhanced Atmosphere

As shown in Figure 12, the luminous flame heights are depicted with increasing oxygen concentration in O2/N2 oxygen-enhanced atmosphere. This trend agrees with the Roper model. According to Roper’s approach [29], a jet diffusion flame ends on the symmetry axis at the point where oxygen and fuel meet at the stoichiometric ratio, and the point declines along the centerline owing to increases in diffusive oxygen exchange with increasing oxygen concentration.
In Figure 16, the flame temperature contours and soot volume fractions as the oxygen fraction changes from 30% to 50% are plotted. As shown in Figure 16, as the oxygen mole fraction increases, the high-temperature region transitions from the relatively lower wings of the flame to the tip of the flame along the centerline. Meanwhile, the high concentration of the soot region is located in the wings of the flame. The use of the adiabatic flame temperature as the characteristic flame temperature was verified [28,30]. The evidence for the correlation between the adiabatic flame temperatures and the measured maximum temperatures are illustrated in Table 2. As indicated in the table, both the maximum flame temperature and the adiabatic flame temperature increase with increasing oxygen.
Table 2 also suggests that the maximum soot volume fraction initially increases and then decreases with increasing oxygen, and the maximum soot volume fractions are 13.6, 15.3, and 14.8 ppm. This occurrence was attributed to the competition between early nucleation, surface growth, and oxidation [31,32]. The increase in oxygen concentration leads to an increase in peak flame temperature. Such an increase promotes the pyrolysis of the fuel, resulting in the production of hydrocarbon radicals and H atoms, which enhance soot formation. Increased oxygen concentrations also increase the flame temperature, and soot surface growth rates are increased. However, the increased presence of oxygen promotes oxidative mechanisms because of the attack of soot particles by OH and O radicals, tending to diminish soot concentrations.

5.3. O2/CO2 Oxygen-Enhanced Atmosphere

Similar to ethylene combustion in O2/N2 oxygen-enriched atmosphere, the height of the flame decreased, along with increasing oxygen concentration. A comparison of case7 to case9 in Table 2 suggests that partial replacement of N2 with the same concentration of CO2 caused a slight reduction in flame height.
Figure 17 present the measured distributions of temperature and soot volume fraction for case7 to case9. Results in Figure 17 indicate that the high-temperature region transitioned from the wings of the flame to the tip of the flame along the centerline. This occurrence was similar to combustion in O2/N2 oxygen-enriched atmosphere. However, the maximum soot volume fraction steadily increased as the oxygen fraction increased, compared with the O2/N2 oxygen-enriched atmosphere. Table 2 shows that the maximum temperatures are 1916, 2322, and 2535 K for case7, case8, and case9, respectively. The maximum temperatures are 2276, 2451, and 2678 K for case4, case5, and case6. The reason is that the specific heat capacity of CO2 is larger than that of N2, which results in a significant decrease in flame temperature.
Compared with combustion in O2/N2 oxygen-enriched atmosphere, the maximum soot volume fractions also decreased with the same mole fraction of O2. Table 2 reveals that the maximum soot volume fractions are 4.5, 7.0, and 9.5 ppm for case7, case8, and case9. Meanwhile, the maximum soot volume fractions are 13.6, 15.3, and 14.8 ppm for case4, case5, and case6. The decrease in peak temperature results from weakened fuel oxidation. The decrease in flame temperature causes a decrease in the fuel pyrolysis, which leads to a further decline in C2H2 and H concentrations, which inhibit soot formation [32]. According to [3,33,34] CO2 addition exerts chemical effects, in addition to thermal effects, on the reduction in soot formation. The chemical mechanism of CO2 addition might be to promote the concentrations of oxygen atom and hydroxyl in order to increase the oxidation of soot precursors in soot-forming regions. In a real-life scenario, these effects occur simultaneously and are intimately coupled. Numerical simulation results [3] suggest that the presence of CO2 in the combustion environment can directly influence the chemical reduction of soot and PAH production tendencies. By promoting the main reaction CO2 + H → CO + OH, CO2 enhances the presence of OH radicals in the post-flame zone, which can be responsible for the oxidation of PAH and soot and most of the chemical destruction of their gaseous precursors.

6. Conclusions

A method for simultaneously visualizing 2-D distributions of temperature and soot volume fraction in an ethylene soot flame was presented. The radiation visible flame images were used for the measurements. Compared with previous studies, the effect of self-absorption was specifically considered, and the distributions of 2-D temperature and soot volume fraction were obtained. High-resolution images of the flame (1 mm/65 pixels) were obtained using image processing techniques, and those images were used for measurements by solving the radiative transfer equation with iterative reconstruction.
This study evaluated the effects of fuel flow rate and oxygen concentration on the temperature and soot concentration in three different atmospheres. The experiment results indicates that for combustion in a pure air atmosphere, the maximum temperature slightly declined, and the maximum soot volume fraction slightly increased as the fuel mass flow rate increased. For the same oxygen fraction, combustion in O2/N2 atmosphere produced both a higher flame temperature and soot volume fraction compared with combustion in O2/CO2 oxygen-enriched atmosphere. The results showed that this technique is reliable and can be used for combustion diagnosis.

Acknowledgments

The present study has been supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, CUMT: 2015QNA14, this work is also a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

Author Contributions

Weijie Yan conceived and designed the experiments; Weijie Yan, Zuomei Yang, Dongmei Chen and Enyu Yan performed the experiments; Weijie Yan and Peitao Zhao analyzed the data; Weijie Yan wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Buhre, B.J.P.; Elliott, L.K.; Sheng, C.D.; Gupta, R.P.; Wall, T.F. Oxy-fuel combustion technology for coal-fired power generation. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2005, 31, 283–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Molina, A.; Shaddix, C.R. Ignition and devolatilization of pulverized bituminous coal particles during oxygen/carbon dioxide coal combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2007, 31, 1905–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, F.S.; Guo, H.S.; Smallwood, G.J.; Gülder, Ö. The chemical effects of carbon dioxide as an additive in an ethylene diffusion flame: Implications for soot and NOx formation. Combust. Flame 2001, 125, 778–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Oh, K.C.; Shin, H.D. The effect of oxygen and carbon dioxide concentration on soot formation in non-premixed flames. Fuel 2006, 85, 615–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Watanabe, H.; Yamamoto, J.I.; Okazaki, K. NOx formation and reduction mechanisms in staged O2/CO2 combustion. Combust. Flame 2011, 158, 1255–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hecht, E.S.; Shaddix, C.R.M.; Geier, A.; Molina, B.S.H. Effect of CO2 and steam gasification reactions on the oxy-combustion of pulverized coal char. Combust. Flame 2012, 159, 3437–3447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, Y.; Lee, C.F. Forward-illumination light-extinction technique for soot measurement. Appl. Opt. 2006, 45, 2046–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Thomson, K.A.; Johnson, M.R.; Snelling, D.R.; Smallwood, G.J. Diffuse-light two-dimensional line-of-sight attenuation for soot concentration measurements. Appl. Opt. 2008, 47, 694–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Leschowski, M.; Thomson, K.A.; Snelling, D.R.; Schulz, C.; Smallwood, G.J. Combination of LII and extinction measurements for determination of soot volume fraction and estimation of soot maturity in non-premixed laminar flames. Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt. 2015, 119, 685–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Snelling, D.R.; Smallwood, G.J.; Liu, F.; Gülder, Ö.L.; Bachalo, W.D. A calibration independent laser-induced incandescence technique for soot measurement by detecting absolute light intensity. Appl. Opt. 2005, 44, 6773–6785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kotzagianni, M.; Yuan, R.; Mastorakos, E.; Couris, S. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy measurements of mean mixture fraction in turbulent methane flames with a novel calibration scheme. Combust. Flame 2016, 167, 72–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vattulainen, J.; Nummela, V.; Hernberg, R.; Kytöla, J. A system for quantitative imaging diagnostics and its application to pyrometric in-cylinder flame-temperature measurements in large diesel engines. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2000, 11, 103–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lu, G.; Yan, Y.; Riley, G.; Bheemul, H.C. Concurrent measurement of temperature and soot concentration of pulverized coal flames. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2002, 51, 990–995. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang, F.; Wang, X.J.; Ma, Z.Y.; Yan, J.H.; Chi, Y.; Wei, C.Y.; Ni, M.J.; Cen, K.F. The research on the estimation for the NOx emissive concentration of the pulverized coal boiler by the flame image processing technique. Fuel 2002, 81, 2113–2120. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lou, C.; Zhou, H.C.; Yu, P.F.; Jiang, Z.W. Measurements of the flame emissivity and radiative properties of particulate medium in pulverized-coal-fired boiler furnaces by image processing of visible radiation. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2007, 31, 2771–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kuhn, P.B.; Ma, B.; Connelly, B.C.; Smooke, M.D.; Long, M.B. Soot and thin-filament pyrometry using a color digital camera. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2011, 33, 743–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Draper, T.S.; Zeltner, D.; Tree, D.R.; Xue, Y.; Tsiava, R. Two-Dimensional flame temperature and emissivity measurements of pulverized oxy-coal flames. Appl. Energy 2012, 95, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yan, W.J.; Lou, C. Two-Dimensional distributions of temperature and soot volume fraction inversed from visible flame images. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2013, 50, 229–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yan, W.J.; Zhou, H.C.; Jiang, Z.W.; Lou, C.; Zhang, X.K.; Chen, D.L. Experiments on measurement of temperature and emissivity of municipal solid waste (msw) combustion by spectral analysis and image processing in visible spectrum. Energy Fuels 2013, 27, 6754–6762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zheng, S.; Zhang, X.Y.; Qi, C.B.; Zhou, H.C. Modeling of heat transfer and pyrolysis reactions in ethylene cracking furnace based on 3-D combustion monitoring. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2015, 94, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Luo, Z.X.; Xiang, Q.; Cheng, Q.; Lou, C. Changing characteristics of flame images under different oxy-fuel atmospheres in a 3-MW pilot-scale furnace. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2016, 10, 2265–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Åkesson, E.O.; Daun, K.J. Parameter selection methods for axisymmetric flame tomography through Tikhonov regularization. Appl. Opt. 2008, 3, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Revalde1, G.; Zorina, N.; Skudra, A. Line shape measurement and modelling for plasma diagnostics. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2014, 548, 012034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Snelling, D.R.; Thomson, K.A.; Smallwood, G.J.; Gülder, Ö.; Weckman, E.J.; Fraser, R.A. Spectrally resolved measurement of flame radiation to determine soot temperature and concentration. AIAA J. 2002, 40, 1789–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huang, Q.X.; Wang, F.; Liu, D.; Ma, Z.Y.; Yan, J.H.; Chi, Y.; Cen, K.F. Reconstruction of soot temperature and volume fraction profiles of an asymmetric flame using stereoscopic tomography. Combust. Flame 2009, 156, 565–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fu, T.R.; Cheng, X.F.; Wu, B.; Zhong, M.H.; Shi, C.L.; Liu, T.M. The set-up of a vision pyrometer. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2006, 17, 659–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guo, H.S.; Liu, F.S.; Smallwood, G.J.; Gülder, Ö.L. Numerical study on the influence of hydrogen addition on soot formation in a laminar ethylene–air diffusion flame. Combust. Flame 2006, 145, 324–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gomez, A.; Glassman, I. Quantitative comparison of fuel soot formation rates in laminar diffusion flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 1987, 21, 1087–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Roper, F.G. The prediction of laminar jet diffusion flame sizes: Part I. theoretical model. Combust. Flame 1977, 29, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Axelbaum, R.L.; Law, C.K. Soot formation and inert addition in diffusion flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 1991, 23, 1517–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Choi, M.Y.; Lee, K.O. Effects of turbulence on species mass fractions in methane/air jet flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 1996, 26, 1243–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, J.; Megaridis, C.M. Soot microstructure in steady and flickering laminar methane/air diffusion flames. Combust. Flame 1998, 112, 473–484. [Google Scholar]
  33. Guo, Z.; Lou, C.; Liu, Z.D.; Zhou, H.C. The impact of combustion characteristics and flame structure on soot formation in oxy-enhanced and oxy-fuel diffusion flames. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2013, 56, 1618–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Du, D.X.; Axelbaum, R.L.; Law, C.K. The influence of carbon dioxide and oxygen as additives on soot formation in diffusion flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 1990, 23, 1501–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow diagram of iterative reconstruction.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of iterative reconstruction.
Energies 10 00750 g001
Figure 2. Measurement simulation of the absolute radiation intensity of the flame (a) at 30 mm high; and (b) at 50 mm high.
Figure 2. Measurement simulation of the absolute radiation intensity of the flame (a) at 30 mm high; and (b) at 50 mm high.
Energies 10 00750 g002
Figure 3. Updated trend value of the soot volume fraction at a height of 30 mm during iterations.
Figure 3. Updated trend value of the soot volume fraction at a height of 30 mm during iterations.
Energies 10 00750 g003
Figure 4. Iteration results with (a) temperature at 30 mm; (b) soot volume fraction at 30 mm; (c) temperature at 50 mm; and (d) soot volume fraction at 50 mm.
Figure 4. Iteration results with (a) temperature at 30 mm; (b) soot volume fraction at 30 mm; (c) temperature at 50 mm; and (d) soot volume fraction at 50 mm.
Energies 10 00750 g004
Figure 5. Schematic of the experimental equipment and the burner.
Figure 5. Schematic of the experimental equipment and the burner.
Energies 10 00750 g005
Figure 6. Photo of the digital flame images acquisition system.
Figure 6. Photo of the digital flame images acquisition system.
Energies 10 00750 g006
Figure 7. Five different parts of a flame (a,b) the composite image.
Figure 7. Five different parts of a flame (a,b) the composite image.
Energies 10 00750 g007
Figure 8. (a) Camera calibration of relative spectral response setup; and (b) Typical monochromatic radiation images.
Figure 8. (a) Camera calibration of relative spectral response setup; and (b) Typical monochromatic radiation images.
Energies 10 00750 g008
Figure 9. Spectral response curves of the R, G, and B bands of the color digital camera (Type: Manta G-504).
Figure 9. Spectral response curves of the R, G, and B bands of the color digital camera (Type: Manta G-504).
Energies 10 00750 g009
Figure 10. Schematic of the camera blackbody calibration.
Figure 10. Schematic of the camera blackbody calibration.
Energies 10 00750 g010
Figure 11. Variations of (a) log ( E R ) and (b) log ( E G ) with log ( R / e x p o s u r e   t i m e ) and log ( G / e x p o s u r e   t i m e ) , respectively.
Figure 11. Variations of (a) log ( E R ) and (b) log ( E G ) with log ( R / e x p o s u r e   t i m e ) and log ( G / e x p o s u r e   t i m e ) , respectively.
Energies 10 00750 g011
Figure 12. Color images of ethylene flames in pure air atmosphere, O2/N2, and O2/CO2 oxygen-enhanced atmospheres.
Figure 12. Color images of ethylene flames in pure air atmosphere, O2/N2, and O2/CO2 oxygen-enhanced atmospheres.
Energies 10 00750 g012
Figure 13. Comparison of temperature and soot volume fraction profiles at flame height z = 30 mm of case 3 with the results in Ref. [24,28].
Figure 13. Comparison of temperature and soot volume fraction profiles at flame height z = 30 mm of case 3 with the results in Ref. [24,28].
Energies 10 00750 g013
Figure 14. 2-D distributions of temperature T (K) and soot volume fraction (10−6) for case1.
Figure 14. 2-D distributions of temperature T (K) and soot volume fraction (10−6) for case1.
Energies 10 00750 g014
Figure 15. 2-D distributions of temperature T (K) and soot volume fraction (10−6) for C2H4 combustion in pure air atmospheres.
Figure 15. 2-D distributions of temperature T (K) and soot volume fraction (10−6) for C2H4 combustion in pure air atmospheres.
Energies 10 00750 g015
Figure 16. 2-D distributions of temperature T (K) and soot volume fraction (10−6) for C2H4 combustion in O2/N2 oxygen-enhanced atmospheres.
Figure 16. 2-D distributions of temperature T (K) and soot volume fraction (10−6) for C2H4 combustion in O2/N2 oxygen-enhanced atmospheres.
Energies 10 00750 g016
Figure 17. 2-D distributions of temperature T(K) and soot volume fraction (10−6) for C2H4 combustion in O2/CO2 oxygen-enhanced atmospheres.
Figure 17. 2-D distributions of temperature T(K) and soot volume fraction (10−6) for C2H4 combustion in O2/CO2 oxygen-enhanced atmospheres.
Energies 10 00750 g017
Table 1. Experimental conditions.
Table 1. Experimental conditions.
Case χ O 2 T a d ( K ) Q C 2 H 4 , 1 mL / min Q air , 0 L / min Q O 2 , 0 L / min Q CO 2 , 0 L / min
Case121%2369.013228400
Case221%2369.015028400
Case321%2369.019428400
Case430%2647.6194252320
Case540%2818.6194216680
Case650%2926.81941801040
Case730%2278.0194085199
Case840%2517.81940114170
Case950%2684.81940142142
Note: T a d represents the adiabatic flame temperature, calculated using CHEMKIN PRO.
Table 2. Maximum temperatures and soot volume fractions of the nine cases.
Table 2. Maximum temperatures and soot volume fractions of the nine cases.
Case χ O 2 L f ( mm ) T a d ( K ) T max ( K ) f v ( ppm )
Case121%40.12369.021196.8
Case221%51.52369.021057.3
Case321%71.02369.020577.8
Case430%46.22647.6227613.6
Case540%29.02818.6245115.3
Case650%21.02926.8267814.8
Case730%50.92278.019164.5
Case840%30.72517.823227.0
Case950%21.72684.825359.5

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yan, W.; Chen, D.; Yang, Z.; Yan, E.; Zhao, P. Measurement of Soot Volume Fraction and Temperature for Oxygen-Enriched Ethylene Combustion Based on Flame Image Processing. Energies 2017, 10, 750. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10060750

AMA Style

Yan W, Chen D, Yang Z, Yan E, Zhao P. Measurement of Soot Volume Fraction and Temperature for Oxygen-Enriched Ethylene Combustion Based on Flame Image Processing. Energies. 2017; 10(6):750. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10060750

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yan, Weijie, Dongmei Chen, Zuomei Yang, Enyu Yan, and Peitao Zhao. 2017. "Measurement of Soot Volume Fraction and Temperature for Oxygen-Enriched Ethylene Combustion Based on Flame Image Processing" Energies 10, no. 6: 750. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10060750

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop