Next Article in Journal
An Improved Ångström-Type Model for Estimating Solar Radiation over the Tibetan Plateau
Previous Article in Journal
A Vertical Flux-Switching Permanent Magnet Based Oscillating Wave Power Generator with Energy Storage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Direct Coal Liquefaction with Fe3O4 Nanocatalysts Prepared by a Simple Solid-State Method

1
Key Laboratory of Energy Materials Chemistry, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Advanced Functional Materials, Autonomous Region, Institute of Applied Chemistry, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, Xinjiang, China
2
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, Xinjiang, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2017, 10(7), 886; https://doi.org/10.3390/en10070886
Submission received: 4 February 2017 / Revised: 19 April 2017 / Accepted: 26 June 2017 / Published: 1 July 2017
(This article belongs to the Section I: Energy Fundamentals and Conversion)

Abstract

:
Fe3O4 nanoparticles were prepared by a simple solid-state method under ambient conditions. The obtained nanoparticles, with small size and large surface area, were used as a catalyst for direct coal liquefaction (DCL). The results display that high conversion and oil yield were achieved with the nanocatalysts in direct liquefaction of two kinds of coals, i.e., Heishan coal and Dahuangshan coal. The effects of the temperature, initial H2 pressure, and holding time on conversion and product distribution have been investigated in the catalytic hydrogenation of Dahuangshan coal. The optimal reaction condition for DCL in which conversion and oil yield are 96.6 and 60.4 wt % was determined with Fe3O4 nanocatalysts. This facile solid-state route is beneficial for scale-up synthesis of iron-based catalysts with good performance for DCL.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Nowadays, it the issue of how coal is used efficiently and cleanly is of increasing concern, because of the rapid depletion of fossil fuels and the deterioration of the environment [1,2]. Direct coal liquefaction (DCL), which is one means processing coal into liquids, has received an increasing amount of attention [3]. It is critical to further improve the efficiency and reduce the cost of DCL processes, in view of its pervasive application [4]. As one of the valid methods, the development of catalysts with high efficiency, which could promote coal conversion and decrease reaction severity, has been considered by researchers [5,6].
In the past several decades, many kinds of catalysts have been studied for DCL [7,8,9,10]. Iron-based catalysts are predominant among them, because they are low-cost, abundant, and disposable [11,12]. However, they usually show lower catalytic activity toward DCL, which is unfavorable for the transformation from coal to liquids. As a consequence, some approaches have been developed to improve the performance of iron-based catalysts, such as decreasing the particle size of catalysts and enhancing dispersion of catalysts in the reaction system [13,14,15,16]. In particular, nanosized iron-based materials show superior catalytic activity for DCL [17,18]. Recently, Fe3O4 nanoparticles capped with oleic acid have been prepared by our group by thermal decomposition and solution-based dehydration process, respectively [19,20]. The nanocatalysts displayed higher activity toward DCL than commercial Fe3O4 powders. In particular, a large-scale synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles was achieved through the solution-based dehydration method, which is beneficial for practical DCL applications [20]. However, a large volume of organic solvent is involved in this method, which raises the cost, and is potentially harmful to the environment. Hence, it is still necessary to find a greener way that is feasible for large-scale production of iron-based catalysts with high activity in DCL.
In this paper, a simple solid-state method is applied to the preparation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles at room temperature. The method is green, solvent-free, and conducive to large-scale synthesis of products with nanosize. The obtained Fe3O4 nanoparticles are used as catalysts for hydroconversion of two Chinese coals. The effects of the temperature, initial H2 pressure, and holding time on conversion and product distribution are investigated in detail for liquefaction of Dahuangshan coal. The optimal reaction condition for DCL with Fe3O4 nanocatalysts is determined.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Starting Materials

All chemicals were used as received, without further purification. Ferric(III) chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O, 98.0%), ferrous (II) chloride tetrahydrate (FeCl2·4H2O, 99.7%), and sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 96.0%) were purchased from Zhiyuan Chemical Reagents Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). The raw coals in this study were obtained from the Heishan mine and Dahuangshan mine in the Xinjiang Autonomous Region of China. Their proximate analysis and ultimate analysis results are given in Table 1. The coals used in DCL were ground to fine particles with about 200 mesh.

2.2. Preparation of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles

Fe3O4 nanoparticles were prepared through a solid-state chemical reaction. In a typical experiment, FeCl3·6H2O (10.8 g, 40 mmols) and FeCl2·4H2O (4.0 g, 20 mmols) were mixed by grinding in an agate mortar at room temperature. Subsequently, NaOH (6.4 g, 160 mmols) was added into the mixtures. After grinding for about 30 min, the color of mixtures changed from yellow to black. The resulting solid products were washed with distilled water and absolute ethanol several times, then dried at 80 °C for 3 h.

2.3. Characterization

The crystal structure of the obtained samples was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a Bruker D8 X-ray diffractometer (Bruker Corporation, Karlsruhe, Germany) with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). A field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) image was obtained on a Hitachi S-4800 scanning electron microscope (Hitachi Limited, Tokyo, Japan) with an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. A transmission electron microscope (TEM) image and high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) image were obtained on a JEOL JEM-2010F electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) and Barret-Joyner-Halender (BJH) results were obtained from an Autosorb IQ surface area and porosity analyzer (Quantachrome Instruments, Boynton Beach, FL, USA).

2.4. Reaction of DCL

Liquefaction reactions were conducted in a 0.5 L batch-stirred autoclave. The process of DCL catalyzed by Fe3O4 nanoparticles and the separation procedure of products were similar to the previous studies [19,20]. In a typical experiment, 10.0 g of coal, 20.0 g of tetralin as a solvent, Fe3O4 nanoparticles (Fe is 1.4 wt % of dry and ash-free (daf) coal) as a catalyst, and sulfur (S/Fe mole ratio is 1.8) as a cocatalyst were mixed and charged into the reactor. After replacing air in the autoclave with H2 (99.99%), the reactor was pressurized with H2 to 6 MPa at room temperature and heated to 430 °C. Then, the mixture was stirred with 300 rpm for 60 min at that temperature. After the autoclave was rapidly cooled by blowing to room temperature, the resulting liquid and solid product was extracted in sequence with n-hexane and tetrahydrofuran (THF) in a Soxhlet extractor (Hualikexi Co., Ltd., Urumqi, China). The n-hexane-soluble (HS), n-hexane-insoluble but THF-soluble, and THF-insoluble substances were defined as oil, asphaltene and pre-asphaltene (APA), and residue, respectively. Different reaction temperatures (410, 420, 440, and 450 °C), initial H2 pressures (4, 5, 7, and 8 MPa), and holding times (30, 45, 75, and 90 min) for the catalytic hydrogenation of Dahuangshan coal were also conducted. The conversion, oil yield, APA yield, and gas yield of coal were determined using the following equations:
conversion/wt % = [1 − (WrWashWc)/Wdaf] × 100
oil yield/wt % = [(WHSWs)/Wdaf] × 100
APA yield/wt % = (WAPA/Wdaf) × 100
gas yield/wt % = conversion − oil yield − APA yield
where Wdaf is the weight of dry and ash-free coal; Wr is the weight of the residue; Wash is the weight of ash; Wc is the total weigh of Fe3O4 and sulfur; WHS is the weight of HS substances; Ws is the weight of solvent; and WAPA is the weight of APA. The reported coal conversion and product yields for DCL are the average values of at least two equivalent experiments, and the error bars are indicated in Figure 2.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structure and Morphology Characterization of Nanocatalysts

The structure and morphology of the as-prepared samples were investigated by XRD, FESEM, and TEM. In Figure 1a, it can be seen that all peaks of the XRD pattern are indexed to Fe3O4 with the cubic structure (JCPDS No. 19-0629). Peaks resulting from impurities were not observed in the XRD results, confirming the pure phase of the product. The broader diffraction peaks also imply a fine grain size in the Fe3O4 sample. Figure 1b displays the representative FESEM image of the obtained Fe3O4. Many spherical particles with a size of 20–100 nm can be observed. In the TEM image of the sample in Figure 1c, the structural information is further confirmed. The fringe spacing of 0.25 nm shown in the HRTEM image (Figure 1c, inset) agrees well with the (311) plane of cubic Fe3O4.
The Fe3O4 nanoparticles were obtained through the solid-state chemical reaction among reactants in a one-pot process under ambient conditions. Expensive and toxic organic solvents were not involved in the method. The method for the synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles is facile, green, cost-effective, and easy to scale-up, which are beneficial for the application in many fields.

3.2. Catalytic Properties of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles in DCL

The catalytic performances of the as-prepared Fe3O4 nanoparticles for DCL were investigated. Figure 2 shows the results of catalytic hydrogenation of two Chinese coals, i.e., Heishan coal and Dahuangshan coal. It is observed that low conversion (66.8 wt %), oil yield (43.8 wt %), and gas yield (11.7 wt %) for Heishan coal were presented in the absence of catalysts. With the addition of Fe3O4 nanoparticals, the conversion, oil yield, and gas yield of Heishan coal increased to 76.4, 53.8, and 13.9 wt %, respectively. The APA yield dropped to 8.7 wt % with the nanocatalysts, while it was 11.3 wt % without catalysts. It is obvious that Fe3O4 nanoparticles exhibited high catalytic activity toward DCL, and the transform from APA to oil was promoted by the Fe3O4 nanocatalysts, which possess enhanced selectivity for oil components. Similarly, in the liquefaction of Dahuangshan coal, conversion and oil yield increased by 16.3 and 20.2 wt %, respectively, with Fe3O4 nanoparticals compared to liquefaction without catalysts. The superior catalytic activity of Fe3O4 nanoparticles may be attributable to their small size and large specific surface area. Based on the result of nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm measurement (Figure S1), it can be seen that the Fe3O4 nanoparticles manifested a surface area of 143.0 m2/g and a pore volume of 0.168 cm3/g. The large surface area and pore volume of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles are of great benefit to full contact between coal and catalyst, which will promote the catalytic hydrogenation of coal. Furthermore, it reveals that the conversion and oil yield of Dahuangshan coal are higher than that of Heishan coal with Fe3O4 nanoparticles. The larger Vdaf (i.e., volatiles based on dry and ash-free coal) and H/C (atomic ratio of hydrogen to carbon) of Dahuangshan coal (Table 1) are beneficial for its hydrogenation, which leads to a higher transformation efficiency of Dahuangshan coal for DCL. In addition, an increased gas yield was observed in the liquefaction of Dahuangshan coal. This may be ascribed to the higher oxygen content, which forms carbon oxides during the direct liquefaction of Dahuangshan coal.
The liquefaction performance of Dahuangshan coal was further studied in light of the fact that Dahuangshan coal showed more suitable properties for DCL than Heishan coal. The effects of the temperature, initial H2 pressure, and holding time on conversion and product distribution of Dahuangshan coal were investigated in detail. The temperature, which affects the behaviors of coal pyrolysis and radical formation, is an important factor during liquefaction [21]. Direct liquefaction of Dahuangshan coal with Fe3O4 nanocatalysts was studied at several temperatures between 410 and 450 °C. As shown in Figure 3, the conversion and oil yield increase with the rise in temperature, and they reach the maximum values of 96.6 wt % and 60.4 wt %, respectively, at 430 °C. But the 84.8 wt % of conversion and 52.8 wt % of oil yield are obtained at 450 °C. They decrease with a further rise in temperature from 430 to 450 °C. The reason for this may be that the proper temperature is required for the matching between generated radicals and active hydrogen. Hence, the free radicals can be stabilized by activated hydrogen in the solvent of the liquefaction, thus the retrogressive reaction is suppressed. Moreover, it can be seen that the APA yield decreases with the rise of temperature, while the gas yield increases. The high temperature is beneficial for the formation of small-molecule gas products.
The amount of H2, which is regarded as a source of active hydrogen, is also of importance for DCL. A high H2 pressure is beneficial, as it suppresses retrogressive reactions and promotes hydrogenation. Nevertheless, economic considerations are also necessary. Figure 4 shows the results of catalytic hydrogenation of Dahuangshan coal with Fe3O4 nanoparticles under different initial H2 pressure at 430 °C. The conversion increases with initial H2 pressure between 4 and 6 MPa, and then changes smoothly with further increase in pressure. Meanwhile, it can be observed that an increase of initial H2 pressure from 4 to 6 MPa causes an increase in the oil yield. However, when the pressure is over 6 MPa, the oil yield changes little. In addition, the APA yield and gas yield are almost constant in all ranges of the initial H2 pressure. The higher H2 pressure is beneficial for the reaction between radical fragments and active hydrogen, which improves the liquefaction of coal. However, the operating severity and manufacturing cost are raised in the high pressure. Thus, a moderate H2 pressure (6 MPa for this work) is favorable in the practical DCL.
Holding time is another factor that could influence product distribution in DCL. Figure 5 demonstrates the variations of conversion and yields versus the holding time in the liquefaction of Dahuangshan coal with Fe3O4 nanoparticles at 430 °C. It reveals that the conversion and oil yield float with the prolonging of holding time. The maximum values of conversion and oil yield are exhibited at 75 min and 60 min, respectively. It is also noted that the gas yield increases with the extension of holding time and reaches the maximum value at 75 min, while the APA yield decreases continuously with the increase of holding time. Although a longer holding time at the target temperature is good for conversion and gas yield, the highest oil yield is shown at a moderate holding time. This implies that longer reaction times will benefit the transformation from coal to gas products. Therefore, it is confirmed that the moderate holding time of 60 min is suitable for the coal-to-oil, and the high oil yield of 60.4 wt % is obtained by Fe3O4 nanocatalysts.
The optimal reaction condition for DCL with Fe3O4 nanocatalysts is determined based on the above studies. A good result of the liquefaction of Dahuangshan coal is obtained with initial H2 pressure of 6 MPa at 430 °C for 60 min. The conversion, oil yield, APA yield, and gas yield are 96.6, 60.4, 16.8, and 19.4 wt % under those conditions, respectively. The results of DCL catalyzed by various nanomaterials are shown in Table S1. It indicates that the Fe3O4 nanoparticles prepared by the solid-state route are one of worthy catalysts for DCL. The ease of production of Fe3O4 nanocatalysts makes them potential candidates in practical DCL.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, a facile and green method has been used for the synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Fe3O4 particles with sizes of 20–100 nm were prepared by a solid-state chemical reaction under ambient conditions. The obtained nanoparticles exhibited superior catalytic performance in the direct liquefaction of two Chinese coals. The optimal result for DCL was achieved at 430 °C for 60 min with an initial H2 pressure of 6 MPa. The conversion, oil yield, APA yield, and gas yield were 96.6, 60.4, 16.8, and 19.4 wt %, respectively, in the catalytic hydrogenation of Dahuangshan coal under the conditions. This simple solid-state method is applicable to large-scale synthesis of Fe3O4 nanocatalysts for DCL.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/7/886/s1, Figure S1: Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm of Fe3O4 nanoparticles, Table S1: Summary of catalytic activities for the direct coal liquefaction with various catalysts.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the College Scientific Research Project of Autonomous Region (No. XJEDU2016S027), the Doctoral Foundation of Xinjiang University (No. BS150234), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21361024, 21471127 and U1503392) and the Open Project Program of Xinjiang Laboratory of Advanced Functional Materials (No. XJDX0902-2013-04).

Author Contributions

All authors conceived and designed the experiments; Yizhao Li performed the experiments and wrote the paper; all authors analyzed the data and approved the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Traa, Y. Is a renaissance of coal imminent?—Challenges for catalysis. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2175–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Li, F.; Fan, L. Clean coal conversion processes—Progress and challenges. Energy Environ. Sci. 2008, 1, 248–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mochida, I.; Okuma, O.; Yoon, S. Chemicals from direct coal liquefaction. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 1637–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, Z.; Shi, S.; Li, Y. Coal liquefaction technologies—Development in China and challenges in chemical reaction engineering. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2010, 65, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vasireddy, S.; Morreale, B.; Cugini, A.; Song, C.; Spivey, J. Clean liquid fuels from direct coal liquefaction: Chemistry, catalysis, technological status and challenges. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 311–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shui, H.; Cai, J.; Xu, C. Recent advances in direct coal liquefaction. Energies 2010, 3, 155–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mochida, I.; Sakanishi, K. Catalysts for coal conversions of the next generation. Fuel 2000, 79, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Song, C.; Saini, A.; Yoneyama, Y. A new process for catalytic liquefaction of coal using dispersed MoS2 catalyst generated in situ with added H2O. Fuel 2000, 79, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chakma, A. Simultaneous liquefaction of a subbituminous coal and upgrading of bitumen with molten ZnCl2-based catalysts. Fuel Process. Technol. 1993, 33, 101–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lv, J.; Wei, X.; Wang, Y.; Yu, L.; Zhang, D.; Yue, X.; Wang, T.; Liu, J.; Zong, Z.; Fan, X.; et al. Light fraction from catalytic hydroconversion of two Chinese coals in cyclohexane over a solid acid. Fuel Process. Technol. 2015, 129, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Derbyshire, F.; Hager, T. Coal liquefaction and catalysis. Fuel 1994, 73, 1087–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gao, S.; Zhang, D.; Li, K. Effect of recycle solvent hydrotreatment on oil yield of direct coal liquefaction. Energies 2015, 8, 6795–6805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hu, H.; Bai, J.; Zhu, H.; Wang, Y.; Guo, S.; Chen, G. Catalytic liquefaction of coal with highly dispersed Fe2S3 impregnated in-situ. Energy Fuels 2001, 15, 830–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kaneko, T.; Tazawa, K.; Okuyama, N.; Tamura, M.; Shimasaki, K. Effect of highly dispersed iron catalyst on direct liquefaction of coal. Fuel 2000, 79, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Methakhup, S.; Ngamprasertsith, S.; Prasassarakich, P. Improvement of oil yield and its distribution from coal extraction using sulfide catalysts. Fuel 2007, 86, 2485–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, L.; Yang, J.; Zhu, J.; Liu, Z.; Li, B.; Hu, T.; Dong, B. Properties and liquefaction activities of ferrous sulfate based catalyst impregnated on two Chinese bituminous coals. Fuel 2002, 81, 951–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Matson, D.; Linehan, J.; Darab, J.; Buehler, M. Nanophase iron-based liquefaction catalysts: Synthesis, characterization, and model compound reactivity. Energy Fuels 1994, 8, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Martino, A.; Wilcoxon, J.; Kawola, J. Synthesis and characterization of coal liquefaction catalysts in inverse micelles. Energy Fuels 1994, 8, 1289–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, Y.; Ma, F.; Su, X.; Sun, C.; Liu, J.; Sun, Z.; Hou, Y. Synthesis and catalysis of oleic acid-coated Fe3O4 nanocrystals for direct coal liquefaction. Catal. Commun. 2012, 26, 231–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Y.; Ma, F.; Su, X.; Shi, L.; Pan, B.; Sun, Z.; Hou, Y. Ultra-large-scale synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and their application for direct coal liquefaction. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 6718–6722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cai, J.; Zhang, J.; Song, W. Characteristics of coal liquefaction in an impinging stream reactor. Energy Fuels 2012, 26, 3510–3513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) XRD pattern; (b) Typical FESEM image; (c) TEM image of as-synthesized Fe3O4 nanoparticles.
Figure 1. (a) XRD pattern; (b) Typical FESEM image; (c) TEM image of as-synthesized Fe3O4 nanoparticles.
Energies 10 00886 g001
Figure 2. Results of the direct liquefaction of (a) Heishan coal and (b) Dahuangshan coal with Fe3O4 nanocatalysts.
Figure 2. Results of the direct liquefaction of (a) Heishan coal and (b) Dahuangshan coal with Fe3O4 nanocatalysts.
Energies 10 00886 g002
Figure 3. Results of the catalytic hydrogenation of Dahuangshan coal with Fe3O4 nanoparticles at different temperatures.
Figure 3. Results of the catalytic hydrogenation of Dahuangshan coal with Fe3O4 nanoparticles at different temperatures.
Energies 10 00886 g003
Figure 4. Results of the catalytic hydrogenation of Dahuangshan coal with Fe3O4 nanoparticles in different initial H2 pressures.
Figure 4. Results of the catalytic hydrogenation of Dahuangshan coal with Fe3O4 nanoparticles in different initial H2 pressures.
Energies 10 00886 g004
Figure 5. Results of the catalytic hydrogenation of Dahuangshan coal with Fe3O4 nanoparticles in different holding times.
Figure 5. Results of the catalytic hydrogenation of Dahuangshan coal with Fe3O4 nanoparticles in different holding times.
Energies 10 00886 g005
Table 1. Proximate and ultimate analysis of two Chinese coals.
Table 1. Proximate and ultimate analysis of two Chinese coals.
CoalProximate Analysis 1 (wt %)Ultimate Analysis (wt %, daf 2)H/C
MadAdVdafCHO 3NS
Heishan1.483.7635.0881.244.479.290.790.460.66
Dahuangshan1.2217.5748.3463.173.6314.301.110.200.69
1 Mad, moisture content of air-dried coal; Ad, ash content of air-dried coal; Vdaf, volatile content of dry ash-free coal. 2 daf, dry ash-free coal. 3 Obtained by difference.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Cao, Y.; Jia, D. Direct Coal Liquefaction with Fe3O4 Nanocatalysts Prepared by a Simple Solid-State Method. Energies 2017, 10, 886. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10070886

AMA Style

Li Y, Cao Y, Jia D. Direct Coal Liquefaction with Fe3O4 Nanocatalysts Prepared by a Simple Solid-State Method. Energies. 2017; 10(7):886. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10070886

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yizhao, Yali Cao, and Dianzeng Jia. 2017. "Direct Coal Liquefaction with Fe3O4 Nanocatalysts Prepared by a Simple Solid-State Method" Energies 10, no. 7: 886. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10070886

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop