Next Article in Journal
Proof-of-Concept of a Zinc-Silver Battery for the Extraction of Energy from a Concentration Difference
Previous Article in Journal
Importance of Fuel Cell Tests for Stability Assessment—Suitability of Titanium Diboride as an Alternative Support Material
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fast Estimation of State of Charge for Lithium-Ion Batteries
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells Using AlOx and Plasma-Immersion Ion Implantation

1
Department of Electronic Engineering, National United University, No. 1, Lienda, Miaoli 36003, Taiwan
2
Department of Engineering and System Science, National Tsing Hua University, No. 101, Section 2, Kuang-Fu Road, Hsinchu, 30013, Taiwan
3
Department of Electronic Engineering, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, No. 57, Sec. 2, Zhongshan Rd., Taiping Dist., Taichung 41170, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2014, 7(6), 3653-3663; https://doi.org/10.3390/en7063653
Submission received: 13 March 2014 / Revised: 20 May 2014 / Accepted: 5 June 2014 / Published: 13 June 2014

Abstract

:
Aluminum oxide (AlOx) and plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII) were studied in relation to passivated silicon heterojunction solar cells. When aluminum oxide (AlOx) was deposited on the surface of a wafer; the electric field near the surface of wafer was enhanced; and the mobility of the carrier was improved; thus reducing carrier traps associated with dangling bonds. Using PIII enabled implanting nitrogen into the device to reduce dangling bonds and achieve the desired passivation effect. Depositing AlOx on the surface of a solar cell increased the short-circuit current density (Jsc); open-circuit voltage (Voc); and conversion efficiency from 27.84 mA/cm2; 0.52 V; and 8.97% to 29.34 mA/cm2; 0.54 V; and 9.68%; respectively. After controlling the depth and concentration of nitrogen by modulating the PIII energy; the ideal PIII condition was determined to be 2 keV and 10 min. As a result; a 15.42% conversion efficiency was thus achieved; and the Jsc; Voc; and fill factor were 37.78 mA/cm2; 0.55 V; and 0.742; respectively.

1. Introduction

As conventional energy sources such as coal, oil, and natural gas are exhausted, solar energy is becoming increasingly crucial [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. The combustion of fossil fuels produces carbon dioxide, which causes the greenhouse effect. Protecting the environment for the next generation is vital; alternative energy sources must be investigated, and renewable energy technologies must be developed to counteract the greenhouse effect. Green energy is a major area of academic and industrial research, and steep increases in petroleum prices have renewed the focus on alternative sources of energy.
In many applications, amorphous silicon/crystalline silicon (a-Si/c-Si) heterojunction solar cells offer several advantages. First, they yield increased open-circuit voltage (Voc) because of their a-Si structure [14]; the band-gap of a-Si is wider than that of c-Si; thus, the Voc of a-Si/c-Si heterojunction solar cells is larger than that of homojunction solar cells. Second, the electric field at the interface of an a-Si/c-Si solar cell is larger than that of a homojunction solar cell [15]. As shown in the energy band diagram, the structure of a-Si/c-Si cell is more beveled than the homojunction structure. Third, a-Si/c-Si heterojunction solar cells are more efficient than homojunction solar cells [16]. Finally, a-Si/c-Si heterojunction solar cells are more effective for generating electric power than a-Si thin film solar cells at high temperatures [17].
In this study, an AlOx layer was deposited on the surface of an a-Si/c-Si heterojunction solar cell. It was expected that the field-effect passivation would improve the short-circuit current density (Jsc) and Voc. Because a-Si and c-Si interfaces have substantial amounts of defects [13], enhancing the electric fields near a-Si and c-Si interfaces can improve carrier mobility and reduce carrier traps at the interfaces.
Plasma immersion ion implantation (PIII) was used in this study to enhance performance [18,19,20]. The target received substantial negative pulse voltage, and plasma was formed by the RF power in the cavity. Simultaneously, nitrogen was imported to produce positively charged nitrogen ions, and the plasma ions implanted nitrogen in the device from all sides. This method allowed for lower implantation energy and higher doses, thereby reducing the number of device defects from ion implantation. PIII was used to reduce the number of dangling bonds in the solar cell.

2. Experimental Section

Figure 1 shows the structure of the solar cell device. After RCA cleaning, an LPCVD furnace was used to deposit a-Si 50 Å to create a heterojunction solar cell; a solar cell without a-Si was also created as a homojunction solar cell. Second, SiO2 was deposited as a PIII buffer layer. PIII was then applied to the top and back sides of the wafer (60 tilt, 40 keV, source BF2, and 7 tilt, 40 keV, source As). After implantation, rapid thermal annealing (1,000 °C, 60 s) was used to activate the ions, followed by etching the SiO2 by using BOE. AlSiCu (5,000 Å) was deposited using PVD on the back contact, and H2 sintering (400 °C, 30 min) was conducted using a furnace.
The basic homojunction (without a-Si) and heterojunction (with a-Si) devices were fabricated as follows. A metal mask was used to define the pattern of the front contact, following the application of 10-nm AlOx on the top of the cells using DC sputtering. Subsequently, DC sputtering was used to deposit a 70-nm ITO ARC-layer on the tops of the cells. Front contact electrodes of 5,000 Å (500 nm) Al were applied using electron beam evaporation. Finally, the cells were cut into 1 × 1 cm2 pieces to measure solar cell efficiency. Three solar cells were fabricated, including a heterojunction solar cell with AlOx passivation, and one without AlOx passivation.
Figure 1. Heterojunction solar cell with AlOx passivation.
Figure 1. Heterojunction solar cell with AlOx passivation.
Energies 07 03653 g001
The use of nitrogen to passivate dangling bonds on a-Si and c-Si solar cell surfaces using PIII was investigated (Figure 2). PIII energy at 2 keV, 4 keV, 6 keV, and 5 min, 10 min, and 15 min of PIII time, were investigated. The short-circuit current (Isc), Voc, fill factor (FF), and conversion efficiency (ç) of the solar cell devices were subsequently compared.
Figure 2. Passivated solar cell by using PIII.
Figure 2. Passivated solar cell by using PIII.
Energies 07 03653 g002
The comparison is shown on Table 1. Depositing AlOx on the surface of a solar cell increased the short-circuit current density (Jsc), open-circuit voltage (Voc), and conversion efficiency from 27.84 mA/cm2, 0.52 V, and 8.97% to 29.34 mA/cm2, 0.54 V, and 9.68%, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. AlOx Measurement and Analysis

AlOx was deposited on the solar cells to passivate the surface by a fixed charge, thereby inducing the field-effect. The number of fixed charges on the AlOx/c-Si interface was determined. AlOx was used to fabricate the AlOx/c-Si capacitance (insert in Figure 3), and the capacitance-voltage (C-V) curve was measured (Figure 3). The area of the capacitance is 50 × 50 μm2. From the C-V characteristics in Figure 3, we can find the flat-band voltage was 2.7 V by voltage sweeping. As a result, we can obtain fixed charges on the AlOx/c-Si interface in 1012 cm−2. The CV curve shows right shifting, it reveals that the negative charges exist in AlOx, and induce an accumulation layer at the p-type silicon interface, resulting in a very effective field-effect passivation [21,22].
Figure 3. Basic structure of AlOx/c-Si capacitance.
Figure 3. Basic structure of AlOx/c-Si capacitance.
Energies 07 03653 g003
As shown in Figure 4, we compared two structures of the homojunction solar cells with and without AlOx passivation samples, both without ITO ARC-layers. As shown by the characteristic I-V curve in Figure 5, the Jsc, Voc, and ç were increased by AlOx passivation.
Figure 4. Comparison of without AlOx and with AlOx structure.
Figure 4. Comparison of without AlOx and with AlOx structure.
Energies 07 03653 g004
Figure 5. The I-V characteristic curve of without AlOx and with AlOx samples.
Figure 5. The I-V characteristic curve of without AlOx and with AlOx samples.
Energies 07 03653 g005
Table 1. The summary table of without AlOx and with AlOx homojunction solar cells.
Table 1. The summary table of without AlOx and with AlOx homojunction solar cells.
Descriptionw/o AlOxw/i AlOx
Jsc (mA/cm2)27.8429.34
Voc (V)0.520.54
FF0.620.611
ç (%)8.979.68

3.2. PIII Measurement and Analysis

The use of nitrogen to passivate dangling bonds on a-Si and c-Si surfaces by using PIII was investigated. To control the nitrogen depth, three PIII energy conditions of homojunction solar cells with AlOx passivation were studied: 2 keV, 4 keV, and 6 keV in 10 min. Based on the I-V curves in Figure 6 and Table 2, the PIII at 2 keV yielded a superior passivation effect. The short-circuit current density (Jsc), open-circuit voltage (Voc), and conversion efficiency were 37.95 mA/cm2, 0.53 V, and 13.47%, respectively.
Moreover, Figure 7a,b show the secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) data for the PIII 4 Kev and PIII 2 Kev samples. From the SIMS results, we find that the position of nitrogen distribution is shallow and has a high concentration at the a-Si and a-Si/C-Si interface.
Table 2. The summary table of without PIII, PIII 2 KeV, PIII 4 KeV, and PIII 6 KeV homojunction solar cells with AlOx passivation.
Table 2. The summary table of without PIII, PIII 2 KeV, PIII 4 KeV, and PIII 6 KeV homojunction solar cells with AlOx passivation.
DescriptionNo PIIIPIII 2 KeVPIII 4 KeVPIII 6 KeV
Jsc (mA/cm2)37.2437.9536.9535.01
Voc (V)0.460.530.480.52
FF0.6330.670.5950.317
ç(%)10.8413.4710.5465.77
Figure 6. The I-V characteristic curve of without PIII, PIII 2 Kev, PIII 4 Kev, and PIII 6 Kev homojunction samples.
Figure 6. The I-V characteristic curve of without PIII, PIII 2 Kev, PIII 4 Kev, and PIII 6 Kev homojunction samples.
Energies 07 03653 g006
Figure 7. (a) The SIMS profiles of PIII 4 KeV sample. (b) The SIMS profiles of PIII 2 KeV sample.
Figure 7. (a) The SIMS profiles of PIII 4 KeV sample. (b) The SIMS profiles of PIII 2 KeV sample.
Energies 07 03653 g007
According to the SIMS results, the PIII at 2 keV offered superior depth control than PIII at 4 keV. Therefore, nitrogen can be imported to produce positively charged nitrogen ions, and plasma ions implanted this nitrogen in the device from all sides. Through a lower implantation energy of only 2 keV and higher doses, the number of device defects and dangling bonds in the solar cell can be reduced.
The three conditions were compared based on reverse dark I-V characteristic curves, as shown in Figure 8. From this characteristic, the nitrogen passivation by using PIII can reduce the leakage current. Therefore, PIII passivation of a-Si and c-Si surfaces decreased the defect density and dangling bonds and enhanced the solar cell performance.
Moreover, a homojunction solar cell with AlOx passivation was treated using 2 keV PIII for three periods of time to determine which time period offered superior concentration control: 5 min, 10 min, and 15 min.
Figure 8. The reverse dark I-V characteristic curve of solar cell (using heterojunction solar cell with AlOx passivation).
Figure 8. The reverse dark I-V characteristic curve of solar cell (using heterojunction solar cell with AlOx passivation).
Energies 07 03653 g008
Based on the I-V characteristic curves and comparison table shown in Figure 9 and Table 3, the PIII for 10 min offered superior concentration control and passivation. The short-circuit current density (Jsc), open-circuit voltage (Voc), and conversion efficiency were 40.14 mA/cm2, 0.54 V, and 13.414%, respectively. Based on the reverse dark I-V characteristic curve shown in Figure 10, the leakage current was also reduced, and the optimized condition was the PIII for 10 min sample.
Figure 9. The I-V characteristic curve of without PIII, PIII 2 KeV 5 min, PIII 2 KeV 10 min, and PIII 2 KeV 15 min samples.
Figure 9. The I-V characteristic curve of without PIII, PIII 2 KeV 5 min, PIII 2 KeV 10 min, and PIII 2 KeV 15 min samples.
Energies 07 03653 g009
Table 3. Summary table of without PIII, PIII 2 KeV 5 min, PIII 2 KeV 10 min, and PIII 2 KeV 15 min homojunction samples without AlOx passivation.
Table 3. Summary table of without PIII, PIII 2 KeV 5 min, PIII 2 KeV 10 min, and PIII 2 KeV 15 min homojunction samples without AlOx passivation.
DescriptionNo PIIIPIII 5 minPIII 10 minPIII 15 min
Jsc (mA/cm2)3840.8340.1440.3
Voc (V)0.530.520.540.54
FF0.6340.6230.6190.562
ç(%)12.87813.23913.41412.241
Figure 10. The reverse dark I-V characteristic curve of solar cell (using homojunction solar cell with AlOx passivation).
Figure 10. The reverse dark I-V characteristic curve of solar cell (using homojunction solar cell with AlOx passivation).
Energies 07 03653 g010

3.3. Optimization of the PIII Condition

Based on these two experiments, PIII at 2 keV for 10 min was demonstrated to yield superior performance. Therefore, this condition was optimized for the passivation of a heterojunction solar cell without AlOx passivation. This yielded a superior conversion efficiency of 15.42% from all of the devices, as shown in Figure 11 and Table 4. The short-circuit current density (Jsc) and open-circuit voltage (Voc) were 37.78 mA/cm2, and 0.55 V. As Figure 12 shows, the leakage current was also reduced compare with no PIII sampls. For these conditions, the number of device defects and dangling bonds can be reduced through PIII in the solar cell.
Figure 11. The I-V characteristic curve comparison of without PIII & PIII 2 KeV 10 min heterojunction solar cells without AlOx.
Figure 11. The I-V characteristic curve comparison of without PIII & PIII 2 KeV 10 min heterojunction solar cells without AlOx.
Energies 07 03653 g011
Table 4. The summary table of without PIII & PIII 2 KeV 10 min heterojunction solar cells without AlOx.
Table 4. The summary table of without PIII & PIII 2 KeV 10 min heterojunction solar cells without AlOx.
DescriptionNo PIIIPIII 2 Kev
Jsc (mA/cm2)35.0637.78
Voc (V)0.550.55
FF0.7550.742
η(%)14.2915.428
Figure 12. The reverse dark I-V characteristic curve of solar cell (using heterojunction solar cell without AlOx passivation).
Figure 12. The reverse dark I-V characteristic curve of solar cell (using heterojunction solar cell without AlOx passivation).
Energies 07 03653 g012

4. Conclusions

AlOx was deposited on a solar cell to passivate the surface by using a fixed charge, to induce the field effect. Solar cell efficiency was enhanced using AlOx, and the Jsc and Voc values were improved slightly because of the reduction of defects on the c-Si surface by field-effect passivation. PIII was administered at three energy levels; 2 keV offered superior performance, and enhanced the Jsc, Voc, and efficiency of the solar cell by effectively reducing the number of dangling bonds on the a-Si and c-Si surfaces. PIII administered for 10 min was found to enhance the Jsc, Voc, and efficiency of the solar cell, and effectively reduced the number of dangling bonds on the a-Si and c-Si surfaces. Excess nitrogen atoms were not present in the formation of impurities. The ideal PIII condition (2 keV, 10 min) was used to to passivate a heterojunction solar cell without AlOx passivation; the solar cell offered a superior conversion efficiency of 15.42%, a Jsc of 37.78 mA/cm2, a Voc of 0.55 V, and an FF of 0.742 (AM1.5, area = 1 cm2).

Acknowledgments

This project was sponsored by the National Science Council of Taiwan under Contract NSC 102-2221-E-239-034.

Author Contributions

In this paper, Yu-Hsien Lin and Yung-Chun Wu contributed to the design and wrote the manuscript. Chun-Hao Chen, Ping-Hua Chen, Yi-He Tsai, and Yi-Yun Yang performed the experiments. All authors collected and analyzed data together. Hsin-Chiang You and K. S. Chang-Liao gave technical support and conceptual advice. All the authors read and approved the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhao, J.; Wang, A.; Green, M.A. 24.5% Efficiency silicon PERT cells on MCZ substrates and 24.7% efficiency PERL cells on FZ substrates. Prog. Photovolt. 2000, 7, 471–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Okamoto, H.; Hamakawa, Y. A-SiC:H/a-Si:H heterojunction solar cell having more than 7.1% conversion efficiency. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1981, 39, 237–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tsubomura, H.; Matsumura, M.; Nomura, Y.; Amamiya, T. Dye sensitised zinc oxide: Aqueous electrolyte: Platinum photocell. Nature 1976, 261, 402–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liao, K.; Yambem, S.D.; Haldar, A.; Alley, N.J.; Seamus, A. Designs and Architectures for the Next Generation of Organic Solar Cells. Energies 2010, 3, 1212–1250. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hammed, W.A.; Yahya, R.; Bola, A.L.; Mahmud, H.N.M.E. Recent Approaches to Controlling the Nanoscale Morphology of Polymer-Based Bulk-Heterojunction Solar Cells. Energies 2013, 6, 5847–5868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ong, P.; Levitsky, I.A. Organic/IV, III-V Semiconductor Hybrid Solar Cells. Energies 2010, 3, 313–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lin, Y.; Wu, Y.; Lai, B. Collection Efficiency Enhancement of Injected Electrons in Dye-sensitized Solar Cells with a Ti Interfacial Layer and TiCl4 Treatment. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2012, 7, 9478–9487. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kutsuki, K.; Okamoto, G.; Hosoi, T.; Shimura, T.; Watanabe, H. Germanium oxynitride gate dielectrics formed by plasma nitridation of ultrathin thermal oxides on Ge(100). Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 022102:1–022102:3. [Google Scholar]
  9. Taguchi, M.; Terakawa, A.; Maruyama, E.; Tanaka, M. Obtaining a Higher Voc in HIT Cells. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2005, 13, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wakisaka, K.; Taguchi, M. More than 16% Solar Cells with a New `HIT' (doped a-Si/nondoped a-Si/crystalline Si). In Proceedings of IEEE, Proceedings of Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 7–11 October 1991; Volume 2, pp. 887–892.
  11. O’Regan, B.; Gratzel, M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 1991, 353, 737–740. [Google Scholar]
  12. Madan, A.; Ovshinesky, S.R.; Czubatyj, W.M.; Shur, M. Some Electrical and Optical Properties of a-Si:F:H Alloys. J. Electron. Mater. 1980, 9, 385–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Von Maydell, K.; Korte, L.; Laades, A.; Stangl, R.; Conrad, E.; Lange, F.; Schmidt, M. Characterization and Optimization of The Interface Quality in Amorphous/Crystalline Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2006, 352, 1958–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sawada, T.; Terada, N.; Tsuge, S.; Baba, T.; Takahama, T.; Wakisaka, K.; Tsuda, S.; Nakano, S. High-Efficiency a-Si/c-Si Heterojunction Solar Cell. In Proceedings of IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 5–9 December 1994; Volume 2, pp. 1219–1226.
  15. Taguchi, M.; Kawamoto, K.; Tsuge, S.; Baba, T.; Sakata, H.; Morizane, M.; Uchihashi, K.; Nakamura, N.; Kiyama, S.; Oota, O. HITTM Cells—High-Efficiency Crystalline Si Cells with Novel Structure. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2000, 8, 503–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tsunomura, Y.; Yoshimine, Y.; Taguchi, M.; Baba, T.; Kinoshita, T.; Kanno, H.; Sakata, H.; Maruyama, E.; Tanaka, M. Twenty-Two Percent Efficiency HIT Solar Cell. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2009, 93, 670–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mishima, T.; Taguchi, M.; Sakata, H.; Maruyama, E. Development status of high-efficiency HIT solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2010, 95, 18–21. [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu, B. The Applications of Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation to Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells. Energy Procedia 2013, 38, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Derbouz, K.; Michel, T.; de Moro, F.; Spiegel, Y.; Torregrosa, F.; Belouet, C.; Slaouil, A. Plasma immersion ion implantation of boron for ribbon silicon solar cells. EPJ Photovolt. 2013, 4, 45105:1–45105:4. [Google Scholar]
  20. Vervisch, V.; Barakel, D.; Torregrosa, F.; Ottaviani, L.; Pasquinelli, M. Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation Applied to P+N Junction Solar Cells. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Ion Implantation Technology (IIT 2006), Marseille, France, 11–16 November 2006; Volume 886, p. 253.
  21. Saint-Cast, P.; Kania, D.; Hofmann, M.; Benick, J.; Rentsch, J.; Preu, R. Very low surface recombination velocity on p-type c-Si by high-rate plasma-deposited aluminum oxide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 151502:1–151502:3. [Google Scholar]
  22. Saint-Cast, P.; Benick, J.; Kania, D.; Weiss, L.; Hofmann, M.; Rentsch, J.; Preu, R.; Glunz, S.W. High-Efficiency c-Si Solar Cells Passivated With ALD and PECVD Aluminum Oxide. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2010, 31, 695–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, Y.-H.; Wu, Y.-C.; You, H.-C.; Chen, C.-H.; Chen, P.-H.; Tsai, Y.-H.; Yang, Y.-Y.; Chang-Liao, K.S. Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells Using AlOx and Plasma-Immersion Ion Implantation. Energies 2014, 7, 3653-3663. https://doi.org/10.3390/en7063653

AMA Style

Lin Y-H, Wu Y-C, You H-C, Chen C-H, Chen P-H, Tsai Y-H, Yang Y-Y, Chang-Liao KS. Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells Using AlOx and Plasma-Immersion Ion Implantation. Energies. 2014; 7(6):3653-3663. https://doi.org/10.3390/en7063653

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Yu-Hsien, Yung-Chun Wu, Hsin-Chiang You, Chun-Hao Chen, Ping-Hua Chen, Yi-He Tsai, Yi-Yun Yang, and K. S. Chang-Liao. 2014. "Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells Using AlOx and Plasma-Immersion Ion Implantation" Energies 7, no. 6: 3653-3663. https://doi.org/10.3390/en7063653

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop