Next Article in Journal
A Dynamic Fuzzy Controller to Meet Thermal Comfort by Using Neural Network Forecasted Parameters as the Input
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling and Simulation of Enzymatic Biofuel Cells with Three-Dimensional Microelectrodes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Energies
Volume 7
Issue 7
10.3390/en7074710
energies-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Research on Cellular Instabilities of Lean Premixed Syngas Flames under Various Hydrogen Fractions Using a Constant Volume Vessel

by
Hong-Meng Li
,
Guo-Xiu Li
*,
Zuo-Yu Sun
,
Yue Zhai
and
Zi-Hang Zhou
School of Mechanical, Electronic and Control Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2014, 7(7), 4710-4726; https://doi.org/10.3390/en7074710
Submission received: 2 April 2014 / Revised: 10 July 2014 / Accepted: 15 July 2014 / Published: 22 July 2014
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
An experimental study of the intrinsic instabilities of H2/CO lean (φ = 0.4 to φ = 1.0) premixed flames at different hydrogen fractions ranging from 0% to 100% at elevated pressure and room temperature was performed in a constant volume vessel using a Schlieren system. The unstretched laminar burning velocities were compared with data from the previous literature and simulated results. The results indicate that excellent agreements are obtained. The cellular instabilities of syngas-air flames were discussed and critical flame radii were measured. When hydrogen fractions are above 50%, the flame tends to be more stable as the equivalence ratio increases; however, the instability increases for flames of lower hydrogen fractions. For the premixed syngas flame with hydrogen fractions greater than 50%, the decline in cellular instabilities induced by the increase in equivalence ratio can be attributed to a reduction of diffusive-thermal instabilities rather than increased hydrodynamic instabilities. For premixed syngas flames with hydrogen fractions lower than 50%, as the equivalence ratio increases, the cellular instabilities become more evident because the enhanced hydrodynamic instabilities become the dominant effect. For premixed syngas flames, the enhancement of cellular instabilities induced by the increase in hydrogen fraction is the result of both increasing diffusive-thermal and hydrodynamic instabilities.

1. Introduction

With the increased energy demands and concerns about environmental protection, the development and the application of high efficiency clean combustion has attracted more and more attention. Lean mixture combustion has a number of positive features such as providing high thermal efficiency and reducing emissions [1,2,3,4,5]. Synthesis gas (syngas) has attracted significant interest in the field of energy and combustion as a promising alternative and an environmentally clean fuel [6,7]. Syngas primarily consists of H2 and CO and can be derived from numerous sources. Syngas can be used in many power devices, such as gas turbines for integrated gasification combined cycle systems (IGCC) [8]. However, designing suitable combustors is a big challenge because of the significant variations in the composition of syngas due to the feedstock and gasification techniques [9]. Hence, the study of the fundamental combustion characteristics of H2/CO premixed flames under different hydrogen fractions is important for further applications of syngas.
In a premixed flame, the appearance of cellular instabilities wrinkles the flame front and accelerates flame propagation, flame front instabilities may also contribute to the transition from deflagration to detonation [10]. The intrinsic instabilities of premixed flames are caused by hydrodynamic, diffusive-thermal, and body-force instabilities [11]. Hydrodynamic instability, which is caused by the expansion across the flame sheet [12,13], is present in all flames [14,15,16]. Diffusive-thermal instability, which is caused by the preferential diffusion of mass and heat [17,18], is only present in the flames with Lewis number (Le) < 1 [19,20,21,22]. Body-force instability, which is caused by the effect of buoyancy [23], is only apparent when the laminar propagation speed of the flame is low [24].
Up to now, a few studies have reported the cellular instabilities from experimental investigations; some scholars have studied the cellular instabilities of premixed hydrogen-air flames [25,26,27,28,29]. The cellular instabilities of mixtures of premixed hydrogen-hydrocarbon-air flames have also been studied by many scholars [30,31,32,33,34,35]. Nevertheless, studies about cellular instabilities of premixed syngas flames are relatively sparse, and most of the reported articles were mainly focused on cellular instabilities induced by the addition of inert gas or hydrocarbon under selected hydrogen fractions [36,37,38,39,40]. As a matter of fact, syngas is a blended fuel which mainly consists of H2 and CO, so the cellular instabilities of syngas premixed flames are very complex due to the hydrogen fraction variation. To provide more information about the cellular instabilities of syngas premixed flame, this study focuses on lean and stoichiometric premixed H2/CO/air flames as the research object to perform a systematic study on the cellular instabilities of syngas premixed flames under different hydrogen fraction conditions. The phenomena of cellular instabilities of lean premixed syngas flames have been observed at different hydrogen fractions (from 0% to 100%), equivalence ratios (φ, from 0.4 to 1.0) and elevated initial pressure of 0.3 MPa.

2. Experimental and Computational Specifications

2.1. Experimental Setups and Procedure

The experimental method used in this study is mainly composed of six parts: a closed combustion vessel, discharge system, ignition system, optical access system, high-speed camera and data acquisition and control system (Figure 1).
Energies 07 04710 g001 1024
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental apparatus.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental apparatus.
Energies 07 04710 g001
The closed combustion vessel is made of stainless steel and has a cubic inner chamber with a length of 140 mm. The 2-quartz windows of the vessel have effective diameters of 100 mm and are oppositely mounted. The discharge system includes five individual passages, namely, hydrogen bottle, carbon monoxide bottle, air bottle, vacuum pump and environment. The ignition system consists of a 12 V transistorized automotive ignition coil and a pair of tungsten–copper electrodes that are oppositely mounted on the two sides of the vessel other than the windows. The optical access system is Z-shaped and is mainly composed of one lamp, two flat reflectors, two slits and two concave mirrors with diameters of 200 mm and focal lengths of 2000 mm. The high-speed camera used is an IDT Motion Pro-Y4 (IDT, Newark, NJ, USA) operating at 10,000 frames per second with a resolution of 256 pixels × 256 pixels, the individual frame exposure is 3 μs with lamp power of 200 W. The data acquisition and control system mainly consists of two electrical pressure transmitters, one piezoelectric absolute pressure transducer associated with a charge amplifier and a data acquisition system. The two electrical pressure transmitters employed, namely, a DPA01M-P (with a band from −100.0 to 100.0 kPa) and DPA10M-P (with a band from −0.001 to 0.999 MPa), were produced by the Delta Group (Taiwan). The piezoelectric absolute pressure transducer is Kistler 6052C, and the discharge ampler is Kistler 5018A (Kistler, Winterthur, Switzerland). The synchronizer trigger employed is developed by the authors.
Procedurally, the vessel evacuated, and the mixture is prepared by adding hydrogen, carbon monoxide and air according to Dalton’s law of additive pressure under the monitoring of the DPA01M-P and/or DPA10M-P units. The discharge process in the present investigation can be divided into the following stages: (i) the vessel is filled with hydrogen and carbon monoxide until the reading shown at the panel of the DPA01M-P has reached the desired value; (ii) the vessel is filled with air until the reading shown at the panel of DPA01M-P or DPA10M-P has reached the initial mixture pressure; (iii) once the desired mixture is prepared, 20 min is required to ensure the homogeneity and quiescence of the mixture. Finally, a control signal is sent to activate both the ignition system and high-speed camera synchronously, and the delay from the ignition to capture is set to 4 ms. The propagation of flame within the vessel is captured by the camera, whereas the variation of pressure on the inner wall of the vessel is recorded by the Kistler pressure transducer. Prior to refilling for the next set of experiment, the vessel is flushed twice with dry air to remove any residual products. Thereafter, the vessel is evacuated again. In this study, the hydrogen is pure hydrogen with a purity of 99.995%, the carbon monoxide is pure carbon monoxide with a purity of 99.95% and the air is commercial grade compressed dry air with an oxygen-to-nitrogen volume ratio of 21:79.
In the study, at least three measurements have been performed at each condition for obtaining the average value. The initial pressure is measured by a pressure transmitter which accuracy is 0.001 MPa; the variation in initial pressure is 0.3 ± 0.001 MPa, so the relative error for the initial pressure is 0.3%. The high-speed camera is operated at 10,000 frames per second with a resolution of 256 pixels × 256 pixels, and the spatial resolution is 0.39 mm/pixel. The error bars in the figure reflects the corresponding standard deviations of laminar burning velocity and critical flame radius on the multi-times repeated experiments.

2.2. Laminar Burning Velocity

Within the closed combustion vessel, the premixed flame outwardly propagates spherically. The stretched flame propagation speed (Sb) can be derived from the data of flame radius versus time:
Energies 07 04710 i001
where R is the instantaneous flame radius and t is the elapsed time from the spark ignition. The flame propagation is affected by the electrodes when the flame is small, such as during the initial propagation period, and by the wall when the flame is sufficiently large, such as when constant pressure is absent in the spatial environment wherein the flame propagates. Thus, only flame radii between 6 [41] and 20 mm (about 0.3 times the radius of the wall [42]) are employed to avoid the aforementioned effects.
K is the temporal rate of the change of a flame surface element of area A:
Energies 07 04710 i002
K is defined as follows in the case of a spherically expanding laminar flame:
Energies 07 04710 i003
A linear relationship exists between the laminar flame propagation speed and K [43]:
Energies 07 04710 i004
where Lb is the Markstein length of burned mixtures and can be obtained as the negative value of the slope of the Sb − K curve. Energies 07 04710 i005 is the unstretched flame propagation speed and can be considered the flame propagation speed without any stretch effect on the flame front; thus, Energies 07 04710 i005 can be obtained as the intercept value at K = 0.
During the initial propagation period, the flame can be considered to propagate under constant pressure. Energies 07 04710 i006 can be calculated from the mass conservation across the thin flame:
Energies 07 04710 i007
where ρb is the density of the burned mixture and ρu is the density of the unburned mixture calculated with the chemical equilibrium program GASEQ.

2.3. Thermal Expansion Ratio and Flame Thickness

Darrieus and Landau discovered that hydrodynamic instabilities are mainly caused by thermal expansion, which can be indicated by the thermal expansion ratio and flame thickness [26]. The thermal expansion ratio (σ) is defined as the ratio of unburned gas density to that of burned gas, which is calculated as:
σ = ρu / ρb
where ρu and ρb, the unburned and burned gas densities, respectively, can be obtained via thermodynamic calculation. The higher the density jump is, the stronger the destabilization becomes. Flame thickness (δ) can be determined by the temperature profile of the flame structure [40], which is calculated as:
Energies 07 04710 i008
where Tad is the adiabatic temperature; Tu is the unburned gas temperature; and (dT/dx)max is the maximum slope of the temperature profile. The (dT/dx)max is determined using the premixed flame code PREMIX of the CHEMKIN-PRO package and the GRI3.0 Mechanism is used [44], since these where in close agreement with the present experimental laminar burning velocity data. With the decrease in flame thickness, the hydrodynamic instability increases due to the weaker influence of curvature and the enhanced intensity of induced baroclinic torque [26].

2.4. Lewis Number

The diffusive-thermal instability is caused by the competing effects of heat conduction and the reactant diffusion [45] and can always be quantitatively determined using the Lewis number (Le), which is defined as the ratio of the heat diffusivity to mass diffusivity of the deficient reactant to the abundant inert [46] and is used to describe diffusive-thermal instabilities, LeH2 and LeCO can be calculated as expressed by the equation:
Energies 07 04710 i009
where λ/(Cp · ρ) is the thermal diffusivity; Cp is the specific heat at constant pressure; λ is the heat conductivity; ρ is the density of the unburned mixture; and D is the mass diffusivity. For premixed syngas flames, two fuels exist in the reactants, and the Lewis number can thus be evaluated using the method by Law et al. [30], which is expressed as:
Energies 07 04710 i010
where q = qH2 + qCO is the total heat release, with qi (i refers to H2 or CO) being the non-dimensional heat release associated with the consumption of species i, defined as qi = QYi/CpTu, where Q is the heat of reaction; Yi is the supply mass fraction of species i; cp is the specific heat of the unburned gas; and Tu is the unburned gas temperature. LeH2 and LeCO are the Lewis numbers of H2-air mixture and CO-air mixture at φH2 and φCO, respectively, where φH2 = (nH2/nA)/(nF/nA)st, φCO = (nCO/nA)/(nF/nA)st are the H2, and CO-based equivalence ratios, respectively, nH2, nCO, nF, nA are the mole fractions of H2, CO, fuel and air in the reactant mixtures [33,37]. The diffusive-thermal instability is enhanced with the decrease of Lewis number [26].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. System Validation and Laminar Burning Velocity

Published results of laminar burning velocities of H2/CO/air mixtures at 0.3 MPa are lacking, but there are lots of published experiment data of laminar burning velocity with hydrogen fractions of 10% and 50% at 0.1 MPa.
To validate our experimental results, the additional laminar burning velocity of syngas/air mixtures at the pressure of 0.1 MPa has been measured and compared with previously published results. Figure 2 shows the measured laminar burning velocity of H2/CO/air mixtures compared with those of previous studies [42,47,48,49,50,51,52]; all the data were measured with a spherically propagating flame at Pu = 0.1 MPa and all data are in good agreement. This proves the correctness of the data obtained in this investigation.
Energies 07 04710 g002 1024
Figure 2. Comparison of measured unstretched laminar burning velocities and previously published results for 10%H2-90%CO and 50%H2-50%CO mixtures at Pu = 0.1 MPa.
Figure 2. Comparison of measured unstretched laminar burning velocities and previously published results for 10%H2-90%CO and 50%H2-50%CO mixtures at Pu = 0.1 MPa.
Energies 07 04710 g002
Figure 3 gives the unstretched laminar burning velocity versus hydrogen fraction for mixtures with various equivalence ratios at Pu = 0.3 MPa. The data of Park [39] for a 50%H2/50%CO mixture at φ = 1.0 is also plotted in the figure and present work gives value consistent with Park’s experimental results. Simulations using the GRI Mesh 3.0 mechanism are also plotted in the figure and in general give good predictions on the unstretched laminar burning velocities of H2/CO mixtures, although the predicted results are higher than the experimental results for some cases, so the mechanism is also used to ccalculate (dT/dx)max for getting the flame thickness. The unstretched laminar burning velocity of H2/CO mixtures increases with increasing hydrogen fraction and equivalence ratio.
Energies 07 04710 g003 1024
Figure 3. Unstretched laminar burning velocities of H2/CO mixtures at Pu = 0.3 MPa.
Figure 3. Unstretched laminar burning velocities of H2/CO mixtures at Pu = 0.3 MPa.
Energies 07 04710 g003

3.2. Flame Morphology

Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the Schlieren images of premixed syngas-air flames with R = 20 mm with different hydrogen fractions and equivalence ratios, respectively. As shown in Figure 4, for the syngas premixed flame with φ = 0.4, the geometric centre of the flame was obviously lifted up from the initial position (namely, the ignition position) when the hydrogen fraction is below 50%, which means that the body-force instabilities are enhanced. Flames with lower hydrogen fractions show the body-force instabilities more evidently. With the increase of hydrogen fraction for all the equivalence ratios, more cells appear on the flame front. When the hydrogen fraction is higher than 50%, as shown in Figure 5, small cells become uniform over the entire flame front, which means the destabilisation propensity tends to be progressively promoted. From the observation, the cellular instability phenomena are obviously enhanced with the increase in hydrogen fraction for the same equivalence ratio. However, for the same hydrogen fraction, the effects of equivalence ratio on the variation of cellular instability vary. As shown in Figure 5, with hydrogen fractions above 50%, the flame tends to become more unstable with the decrease in equivalence ratio. This phenomenon is similar to seen for natural gas-hydrogen-air premixed flames reported by Huang et al. [35].
However, with hydrogen fractions below 50%, the flame tends to be more stable with the decrease in equivalence ratio, as shown in Figure 4. This observation has never been reported in any previous study.
Energies 07 04710 g004 1024
Figure 4. Schlieren pictures for flames with hydrogen fractions from 10% to 50% at 0.3 MPa at different equivalence ratios for 20 mm radius.
Figure 4. Schlieren pictures for flames with hydrogen fractions from 10% to 50% at 0.3 MPa at different equivalence ratios for 20 mm radius.
Energies 07 04710 g004
Energies 07 04710 g005 1024
Figure 5. Schlieren pictures for flames with hydrogen fractions from 60% to 100% at 0.3 MPa at different equivalence ratios for 20 mm radius.
Figure 5. Schlieren pictures for flames with hydrogen fractions from 60% to 100% at 0.3 MPa at different equivalence ratios for 20 mm radius.
Energies 07 04710 g005
A detailed process of the propagation of the flames with hydrogen fraction of 30% is shown in Figure 6. For the premixed syngas flame with hydrogen fraction of 30% and φ = 0.4, several large cracks are induced by the ignition disturbances during the early propagation period, and those cracks continue to develop without branching as the flame further propagates. For the premixed syngas flame with φ = 0.6 to 1.0, the large cracks formed during the early propagation period become branched as the flame further propagates, and the phenomenon becomes more apparent at higher equivalence ratios. The flame tends to be more unstable with the increasing equivalence ratio. Instead, the cellular instabilities of syngas premixed flames decrease with the increase in equivalence ratio with the hydrogen fraction of 80%, as shown in Figure 7. To give a qualitative explanation, the parameters reflecting flame instability were calculated.
Energies 07 04710 g006 1024
Figure 6. Schlieren pictures for flames of 30%H2-70%CO at 0.3 MPa at different equivalence ratios for different radius.
Figure 6. Schlieren pictures for flames of 30%H2-70%CO at 0.3 MPa at different equivalence ratios for different radius.
Energies 07 04710 g006
Energies 07 04710 g007 1024
Figure 7. Schlieren pictures for flames of 80%H2-20%CO at 0.3 MPa at different equivalence ratios for different radius.
Figure 7. Schlieren pictures for flames of 80%H2-20%CO at 0.3 MPa at different equivalence ratios for different radius.
Energies 07 04710 g007
Figure 8 illustrates the variation in Lewis number with hydrogen fraction at different equivalent ratios at a pressure of 0.3 MPa. The Lewis number generally decreases with the increase in hydrogen fraction. The results indicate that the diffusive-thermal instability of lean syngas premixed flame is enhanced with the increase in hydrogen fraction. In addition, with the increase in equivalence ratio with hydrogen fractions less than 50%, the Lewis number nearly remains at the same value. For the premixed syngas flames with hydrogen fractions of more than 50%, the Lewis number at the same hydrogen fraction decreases with the decrease in equivalence ratio, which implies that the flame of low equivalence ratio is more unstable in terms of diffusive-thermal instability compared with the flame of relatively high equivalence ratio.
Energies 07 04710 g008 1024
Figure 8. Lewis number plotted against hydrogen fraction.
Figure 8. Lewis number plotted against hydrogen fraction.
Energies 07 04710 g008
Figure 9 shows the flame thickness versus the hydrogen fractions for different equivalence ratios at 0.3 MPa. The flame thickness decrease significantly with the increase in hydrogen fraction and equivalence ratio. The decreased flame thickness results in an enhancement of the flame’s destabilising propensity because of the weakened influence of curvature on the flame front as well as the strengthened baroclinic torque intensity, so the hydrodynamic instability is enhanced with the increase in hydrogen fraction and/or equivalence ratio for decreasing flame thickness.
Energies 07 04710 g009 1024
Figure 9. Flame thickness plotted against hydrogen fraction.
Figure 9. Flame thickness plotted against hydrogen fraction.
Energies 07 04710 g009
Figure 10 shows the thermal expansion ratio versus the hydrogen fractions for different equivalence ratios at 0.3 MPa. For a specific equivalence ratio, the thermal expansion ratio decreases inconspicuously with the increase in hydrogen fraction. In addition, for a specific hydrogen fraction, the thermal expansion ratio increases with the increase in equivalence ratio. The results indicate the hydrodynamic instability is enhanced with the increase in equivalence ratio. Based on the above discussions, for a specific hydrogen fraction, the hydrodynamic instabilities of syngas premixed flames are enhanced with the increase in equivalence ratio for both decreasing flame thickness and increasing thermal expansion ratio.
Energies 07 04710 g010 1024
Figure 10. Thermal expansion ratio plotted against hydrogen fraction.
Figure 10. Thermal expansion ratio plotted against hydrogen fraction.
Energies 07 04710 g010
In general, when the hydrogen fraction is less than 50%, the enhancement of the cellular instabilities of the syngas premixed flame with the increase in equivalence ratio can be attributed to the dominant effect of the hydrodynamic instabilities. Furthermore, compared with the inconspicuous variation in thermal expansion ratio, the variation in flame thickness induced by the hydrogen fraction dominantly influences the intensity of hydrodynamic instabilities. At hydrogen fractions greater than 50%, the decline in the cellular instabilities induced by the increase of equivalence ratio can be attributed to the reduced diffusive-thermal instabilities rather than increasing hydrodynamic instabilities. With the increase in hydrogen fraction, the enhancement of the cellular instabilities of H2/CO/air premixed flames results from the diffusive-thermal instability as the Lewis number decreases and the hydrodynamic instability as the flame thickness decreases.

3.3. Critical Flame Radius and Critical Peclet Number

During the initial flame propagation period, the cellular instabilities are suppressed by the strong stretch, and the suppressions decline and even extinguish as the flame expands. The “critical flame radius” (which is defined as the flame radius at which cells are smaller than the branched cracks and are no longer suppressed) has been employed to denote the onset of cellularity. As shown in Figure 11, the point at which the flame speed begins to accelerate rapidly with decreasing stretch defines a critical flame radius because the onset of cellularity is the primary reason of the self-acceleration of the flame [53,54].
Energies 07 04710 g011 1024
Figure 11. Stretched flame speed versus stretch rate.
Figure 11. Stretched flame speed versus stretch rate.
Energies 07 04710 g011
Figure 12 shows the critical flame radius versus the hydrogen fractions at different equivalence ratios. The data of Park [39] for a 50%H2/50%CO mixture at φ = 0.8 and 1.0 is also plotted in the figure and the same trend is found. The critical flame radius evidently decreases with the increase in hydrogen fraction and increases with the increase in equivalence ratio at hydrogen fractions greater than 50%. However, the critical flame radius decreases with the increase in equivalence ratio at hydrogen fractions lower than 50%. This phenomenon is consistent with the observation of flame front photos.
Energies 07 04710 g012 1024
Figure 12. Critical flame radius plotted against hydrogen fraction.
Figure 12. Critical flame radius plotted against hydrogen fraction.
Energies 07 04710 g012
Critical Peclet number (Pecr), also representing the cellular instability, which is defined the ratio of critical flame radius to laminar flame thickness [55]. Figure 13 shows the critical Peclet number versus the hydrogen fraction. Critical Peclet number is influenced by the combined effects of critical flame radius and flame thickness. The critical Peclet number decreases with the increase in hydrogen fraction at hydrogen fractions lower than 50%. However, with the increase in hydrogen fraction at hydrogen fractions greater than 50%, the critical Peclet number increases with equivalence ratios of 0.8 and 1.0, and the critical Peclet number changes little with an equivalence ratio of 0.6.
Energies 07 04710 g013 1024
Figure 13. Critical Peclet number plotted against hydrogen fraction.
Figure 13. Critical Peclet number plotted against hydrogen fraction.
Energies 07 04710 g013

4. Conclusions

In the present work, the cellular instabilities of different hydrogen/carbon monoxide blends were studied using the outwardly propagating flame in a constant volume combustion bomb at elevated pressure and room temperature. The laminar burning velocities of syngas/air mixtures were measured and compared with previously published results and computed results and good agreements are obtained. The major conclusions of the study are as follows:
(1)
When hydrogen fractions are above 50%, the flame tends to be more stable as the equivalence ratio increases; however, the instability increases for flames of lower hydrogen fractions.
(2)
For the premixed syngas flames with hydrogen fractions lower than 50%, the effects of equivalence ratio on the variation in the Lewis number can be neglected. With the increase in equivalence ratio, the cellular instabilities become more evident because the enhanced hydrodynamic instabilities become the dominant effect.
(3)
For the premixed syngas flame with hydrogen fractions greater than 50%, the decline in cellular instabilities induced by the increase in equivalence ratio can be attributed to the reducing diffusive-thermal instabilities rather than the increasing hydrodynamic instabilities.
(4)
For the premixed syngas flame, the enhancement of cellular instabilities induced by the increase in hydrogen fraction is the result of both increasing diffusive-thermal and increasing hydrodynamic instabilities.

Acknowledgments

The present investigation is primarily supported by the Ph.D Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (No. 20110009110023) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. M11JB00300).

Author Contributions

The author contributions list is as follows: Study concepts were proposed by Guo-Xiu Li and Hong-Meng Li. Literature research and study were designed by Hong-Meng Li and Guo-Xiu Li. Experimental studies and data acquisition were done by all the authors. Data analysis/interpretation and statistical analysis were done by Hong-Meng Li, Guo-Xiu Li, and Zuo-Yu Sun. Definition of the intellectual content of the manuscript, manuscript preparation and editing was made by Hong-Meng Li.
Manuscript revision/review was made by Hong-Meng Li and Guo-Xiu Li. Manuscript final version was approved by Guo-Xiu Li.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ji, C.; Wang, S. Combustion and emissions performance of a hybrid hydrogen–gasoline engine at idle and lean conditions. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2010, 35, 346–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, J.; Huang, Z.; Tang, C.; Zheng, J. Effect of hydrogen addition on early flame growth of lean burn natural gas–air mixtures. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2010, 35, 7246–7252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yang, Z.Z.; Wang, L.; He, M.; Cao, Y. Research on optimal control to resolve the contradictions between restricting abnormal combustion and improving power output in hydrogen fueled engines. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2012, 37, 774–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ji, C.; Wang, S.; Zhang, B. Combustion and emissions characteristics of a hybrid hydrogen–gasoline engine under various loads and lean conditions. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2010, 35, 5714–5422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, Z.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Meng, Y.; Pei, P. Research on optimum method to eliminate backfire of hydrogen internal combustion engines based on combining postponing ignition timing with water injection of intake manifold. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2012, 37, 12868–12878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Burluka, A.A.; Ei-Dein Hussin, A.M.T.; Sheppard, C.G.W.; Liu, K.; Sanderson, V. Turbulent combustion of hydrogen-CO mixtures. Flow Turbul. Combust. 2011, 86, 735–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fu, J.; Tang, C.L.; Jin, W.; Thi, L.D.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, Y. Study on laminar flame speed and flame structure of syngas with varied compositions using OH-PLIF and spectrograph. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38, 1636–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cormos, C.C. Evaluation of energy integration aspects for IGCC-based hydrogen and electricity co-production with carbon capture and storage. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2010, 35, 7485–7497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Prathap, C.; Ray, A.; Ravi, M.R. Effects of dilution with carbon dioxide on the laminar burning velocity and flame stability of H2-CO mixtures at atmospheric condition. Combust. Flame 2012, 159, 482–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bradley, D.; Sheppart, C.G.W.; Woolley, R.; Greenhalgh, D.A.; Lockett, R.D. The development and structure of flame instabilities and cellularity at low Markstein numbers in explosions. Combust. Flame 2000, 122, 195–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Williams, F.A. Combustion Theory, 2nd ed.; Addison-Wesley: Redwood, CA, USA, 1985; p. 349. [Google Scholar]
  12. Darrieus, G. Propagation d’un front de flame. Tech. Mod. 1938, 30, 18. [Google Scholar]
  13. Landau, L.D. On the theory of slow combustion. Acta Physicochim. URSS 1944, 19, 77–88. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mazaheri, K.; Mahmoudi, Y.; Radulescu, M.I. Diffusion and hydrodynamic instabilities in gaseous detonations. Combust. Flame 2012, 159, 2138–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hu, E.; Huang, Z.; He, J.; Zheng, J.; Miao, H. Measurements of laminar burning velocities and onset of cellular instabilities of methane-hydrogen-air flames at elevated pressures and temperatures. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2009, 34, 5574–5584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mukaiyama, K.; Shibayama, S.; Kuwana, K. Fractal structures of hydrodynamically unstable and diffusive-thermally unstable flames. Combust. Flame 2013, 160, 2471–2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Markstein, G.H. Cell structure of propane flames burning in tubes. J. Chem. Phys. 1949, 17, 428–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Manton, J.; von Elbe, G.; Lewis, B. Nonisotropic propagation of combustion waves in explosive gas mixtures and the development of cellular flames. J. Chem. Phys. 1952, 20, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kadowaki, S. The effects of heat loss on the burning velocity of cellular premixed flames generated by hydrodynamic and diffusive-thermal instabilities. Combust. Flame 2005, 143, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tang, C.L.; Huang, Z.H.; Jin, C.; He, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Miao, H. Laminar burning velocities and combustion characteristics of propane-hydrogen-air premixed flames. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2008, 33, 4906–4914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Muppala, S.P.R.; Nakahara, M.; Aluri, N.K.; Kido, H.; Wen, J.X.; Papalexandris, M.V. Experimental and analytical investigation of the turbulent burning velocity of two-component fuel mixtures of hydrogen, methane and propane. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2009, 34, 9258–9265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bouvet, N.; Halter, F.; Chauveau, C.; Yoon, Y. On the effective Lewis number formulations for lean hydrogen/hydrocarbon/air mixtures. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38, 5949–5960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Markstein, B.J. Nonsteady Flame Propagation; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1964; p. 49. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kadowaki, S. The body-force effect on the cell formation of premixed flames. Combust. Flame 2001, 124, 409–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tse, S.D.; Zhu, D.L.; Law, C.K. Morphology and burning rates of expanding spherical flames in H2/O2/inert mixtures up to 60 atmospheres. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2000, 28, 1793–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kwon, O.C.; Rozenchan, G.; Law, C.K. Cellular instabilities and self-acceleration of outwardly propagating spherical flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2002, 20, 1775–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sun, Z.Y.; Liu, F.S.; Bao, X.C.; Liu, X.H. Research on cellular instabilities in outwardly propagating spherical hydrogen-air flames. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2012, 37, 7889–7899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Qiao, L.; Gu, Y.; Dahm, W.J.A.; Dahm, E.S.O.; Faeth, G.M. A study of the effects of diluents on near-limit H2-air flames in microgravity at normal and reduced pressures. Combust. Flame 2007, 151, 196–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hu, E.; Huang, Z.; He, J.; Miao, H. Experimental and numerical study on laminar burning velocities and flame instabilities of hydrogen–air mixtures at elevated pressures and temperatures. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2009, 34, 8741–8755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Law, C.K.; Jomaas, G.; Bechtold, J.K. Cellular instabilities of expanding hydrogen/propane spherical flames at elevated pressures: Theory and experiment. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2005, 30, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Law, C.K.; Kwon, O.C. Effects of hydrocarbon substitution on atmospheric hydrogen-air flame propagation. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2004, 29, 867–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Okafor, E.C.; Hayakawa, A.; Nagano, Y.; Kitagawa, T. Effects of hydrogen concentration on premixed laminar flames of hydrogen-methane-air. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 39, 2409–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tang, C.; Huang, Z.; Wang, J.; Zheng, J. Effects of hydrogen addition on cellular instabilities of the spherically expanding propane flames. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2009, 34, 2483–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, X.; Huang, Z.; Wang, X.; Jin, C.; Tang, C.; Wei, L.; Law, C.K. Laminar burning velocities and flame instabilities of 2,5-dimethylfuran-air mixtures at elevated pressures. Combust. Flame 2011, 158, 539–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Miao, H.; Jiao, Q.; Huang, Z.; Jiang, D. Effect of initial pressure on laminar combustion characteristics of hydrogen enriched natural gas. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2008, 33, 3876–3885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Song, W.S.; Jung, S.W.; Par, J.; Kwon, O.B; Kim, Y.J.; Kim, T.H.; Yun, J.H.; Keel, S.I. Effects of syngas addition on flame propagation and stability in outwardly propagating spherical dimethyl ether-air premixed flames. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38, 14102–14114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vu, T.M.; Park, J.; Kwon, O.B.; Kim, J.S. Effects of hydrocarbon addition on cellular instabilities in expanding syngas–air spherical premixed flames. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2009, 34, 6961–6969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hu, E.; Fu, J.; Pan, L.; Jiang, X.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, Y. Experimental and numerical study on the effect of composition on laminar burning velocities of H2/CO/N2/CO2/air mixtures. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2012, 37, 18509–18519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vu, T.M.; Park, J.; Kwon, O.B.; Bae, D.S.; Yun, J.H.; Keel, S.I. Effects of diluents on cellular instabilities in outwardly propagating spherical syngas-air premixed flames. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2010, 35, 3868–3880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, J.; Huang, Z.; Kobayashi, H.; Ogami, Y. Laminar burning velocities and flame characteristics of CO-H2-CO2-O2 mixtures. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2012, 37, 19158–19167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, C.C.; Shy, S.S; Chiu, C.W.; Peng, M.W.; Chung, H.J. Hydrogen/carbon monoxide syngas burning rates measurements in high-pressure quiescent and turbulent environment. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2011, 36, 8595–8603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Burke, M.P.; Chen, Z.; Ju, Y.; Dryer, F.L. Effect of cylindrical confinement on the determination of laminar flame speeds using outwardly propagating flames. Combust. Flame 2009, 156, 771–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bradley, D.; Hicks, R.A.; Lawes, M.; Sheppard, C.G.W.; Woolley, R. The measurement of laminar burning velocities and Markstein numbers for iso-octane–air and iso-octane–n-heptane–air mixtures at elevated temperatures and pressures in an explosion bomb. Combust. Flame 1998, 115, 126–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Smith, G.P.; Golden, D.M.; Frenklach, M.; Moriarty, N.W.; Eiteneer, B.; Goldenberg, M. GRI3.0 Mesh. Available online: http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri_mech/ (accessed on 10 November 2013).
  45. Liu, K.; Burluka, A.A.; Sheppard, C.G.W. Turbulent flame and mass burning rate in a spark ignition engine. Fuel 2013, 107, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Moccia, V.; D’Alessio, J. Burning behaviour of high-pressure CH4-H2-air mixtures. Energies 2013, 6, 97–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hassan, M.I.; Aung, K.T.; Faeth, G.M. Properties of laminar premixed CO/H/air flames at various pressures. J. Propuls. Power 1997, 13, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sun, H.; Yang, S.I.; Jomaas, G.; Law, C.K. High-pressure laminar flame speeds and kinetic modeling of carbon monoxide/hydrogen combustion. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2007, 31, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Krejci, M.C.; Mathieu, O.; Vissotski, A.J.; Ravi, S.; Sikes, T.G.; Petersen, E.L. Laminar flame speed and ignition delay time data for the kinetic modeling of hydrogen and syngas fuel blends. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2013, 135, 021503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Prathap, C.; Ray, A.; Ravi, M.R. Investigation of nitrogen dilution effects on the laminar burning velocity and flame stability of syngas fuel at atmospheric condition. Combust. Flame 2008, 155, 145–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. McLean, I.C.; Smith, D.B.; Taylor, S.C. The use of carbon monoxide/hydrogen burning velocities to examine the rate of the CO + OH reaction. Symp. (Int.) Combust. 1994, 25, 749–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bouvet, N.; Chauveau, C.; Gökalp, I.; Halter, F. Experimental studies of the fundamental flame speeds of syngas (H2/CO)/air mixtures. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2011, 33, 913–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gu, X.J.; Haq, M.Z.; Lawes, M. Laminar burning velocity and Markstein lengths of Methane-air mixtures. Combust. Flame 2000, 121, 54–58. [Google Scholar]
  54. Zamashchikov, V.V.; Alekseev, V.A.; Konnov, A.A. Laminar burning velocities of rich near-limiting flames of hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 39, 1874–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bechtold, J.K.; Matalon, M. Hydrodynamic and diffusion effects on the stability of spherically expanding flames. Combust. Flame 1987, 67, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, H.-M.; Li, G.-X.; Sun, Z.-Y.; Zhai, Y.; Zhou, Z.-H. Research on Cellular Instabilities of Lean Premixed Syngas Flames under Various Hydrogen Fractions Using a Constant Volume Vessel. Energies 2014, 7, 4710-4726. https://doi.org/10.3390/en7074710

AMA Style

Li H-M, Li G-X, Sun Z-Y, Zhai Y, Zhou Z-H. Research on Cellular Instabilities of Lean Premixed Syngas Flames under Various Hydrogen Fractions Using a Constant Volume Vessel. Energies. 2014; 7(7):4710-4726. https://doi.org/10.3390/en7074710

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Hong-Meng, Guo-Xiu Li, Zuo-Yu Sun, Yue Zhai, and Zi-Hang Zhou. 2014. "Research on Cellular Instabilities of Lean Premixed Syngas Flames under Various Hydrogen Fractions Using a Constant Volume Vessel" Energies 7, no. 7: 4710-4726. https://doi.org/10.3390/en7074710

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop