Next Article in Journal
Accuracy Enhancement of Mixed Power Flow Analysis Using a Modified DC Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Control Strategy Optimization for Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicles Using a Memetic Algorithm
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluating the Management System Approach for Industrial Energy Efficiency Improvements
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study of a New Quick-Charging Strategy for Electric Vehicles in Highway Charging Stations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design and Implementation of a High Efficiency, Low Component Voltage Stress, Single-Switch High Step-Up Voltage Converter for Vehicular Green Energy Systems

Department of Electronic Engineering, National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 811, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2016, 9(10), 772; https://doi.org/10.3390/en9100772
Submission received: 30 June 2016 / Revised: 14 September 2016 / Accepted: 20 September 2016 / Published: 25 September 2016

Abstract

:
In this study, a novel, non-isolated, cascade-type, single-switch, high step-up DC/DC converter was developed for green energy systems. An integrated coupled inductor and voltage lift circuit were applied to simplify the converter structure and satisfy the requirements of high efficiency and high voltage gain ratios. In addition, the proposed structure is controllable with a single switch, which effectively reduces the circuit cost and simplifies the control circuit. With the leakage inductor energy recovery function and active voltage clamp characteristics being present, the circuit yields optimizable conversion efficiency and low component voltage stress. After the operating principles of the proposed structure and characteristics of a steady-state circuit were analyzed, a converter prototype with 450 W, 40 V of input voltage, 400 V of output voltage, and 95% operating efficiency was fabricated. The Renesas MCU RX62T was employed to control the circuits. Experimental results were analyzed to validate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed system.

1. Introduction

In response to climate change and global warming induced by heavy use of fossil fuels, energy conservation and carbon reduction techniques, such as developing clean energies and increasing energy use efficiency, have become a global focus. Major countries across the globe have endeavored to develop low-carbon economies based on high performance and low emissions and have adjusted various industry, energy, technology, and transaction-related policies [1,2] to encourage green industry development. Moreover, because fossil fuel supplies are overly concentrated in areas with social instability, fuel prices are typically volatile and affected by human factors (e.g., political schemes and policies). Thus, fossil fuel energy supplies become restricted, resulting in increased geopolitical risks for investors and hindering energy production, transportation, and infrastructure construction and maintenance. Typically, such adversity indirectly leads to social instability and volatile political developments in developing countries. To address these problems, green energies have been developed as the primary method to propel contemporary progression.
The reusability of green energies is unaffected by conventional energy shortages. Numerous applications of green energies have been developed in recent years, such as photovoltaics (PV), wind power, biomass energy, and tidal energy production. However, these green energies are highly dependent on natural conditions and require high investment and maintenance costs, resulting in low power efficiency and high total power generation cost. In addition, the output voltage of reusable energies is low and unstable. Such energy must be converted using a first-stage step-up power converter before it can be used in households. The conversion process is shown in Figure 1. For instance, the input voltage (Vin) of photovoltaic ranges between 20 V and 45 V. To effectively feed the photovoltaic energy into the grid, the voltage must be increased to 380 ± 20 V to facilitate the grid connection for the rear inverter [3,4,5] or charge/discharge battery of an electric vehicle (EV) by a bidirectional DC/DC converter [6,7,8]. In the front-end structure, a boost converter is employed to generate a step-up ratio of at least 1:8. Thus, many high step-up converter structures have been recently researched and developed.
After previous studies have claimed that using a conventional, non-isolated boost converter to multiply voltage requires operating the system duty cycle at an extremely high ratio. Constrained by parasitic elements in the circuit, diodes have a reverse recovery time when equivalent series stray inductance and series impedance of the capacitor exist in the circuit or when switched between on and off transients. These factors restrain the step-up ratio and lower the conversion efficiency [9,10,11]. To achieve a high step-up ratio and conversion efficiency, while maintaining low development cost and compactness of electric power converters, many scholars have developed technical structures to improve boost converter-based step-up ratios. Applying a cascade type [12,13,14] boost converter can boost the voltage stepwise and raise the step-up ratio. However, in doing so, multistage cascade converters complicate the circuit and transmit energy indirectly through a capacitor [15,16], which causes unnecessary energy consumption. Therefore, scholars have proposed a voltage lift technique [17,18] to insert a voltage multiplier formed by a capacitor and diode in the boost pathway to substantially simplify the circuit compared with that of the cascade type. However, the voltage lift technique increases the size and cost of the circuit design and the voltage stress the switch bears remains overly high during high voltage output, thereby lowering the designers’ flexibility in selecting components. Consequently, a concept of integrating coupled inductors [4,19,20] and a coupled inductor cascade [21,22,23] has been proposed to achieve a design with high step-up ratios. This coupled structure couples inductors with a method similar to how a transformer turns a ratio to form a voltage multiplier; thus, the size and cost of circuit design can be reduced considerably. However, when the switched-off leakage of coupled inductors lacks a pathway to release energy, it resonates with the parasitic capacitor of cascade switches, increases the switching voltage stress, and causes increased switching losses, thereby degrading the overall circuit efficiency [24]. To avoid the conversion efficiency deterioration resulting from leakage, scholars have proposed improved circuit designs [19,23] to fabricate a clamping circuit that combines a capacitor and diode, while compromising slight cost and size increases. The clamping circuit can recover leakage energy or increase the control complexity to add a soft-switching converter with zero-current switching (ZCS) and zero-voltage switching (ZVS), to improve the conversion efficiency [25,26,27].
In the present study, a high step-up converter structure for green energy systems was developed. By using integrated voltage multipliers of three groups of coupled inductors, the proposed converter structure can boost voltage and combine a capacitor and diode to produce a boost converter. Additionally, a freewheeling current path is provided to recover leakage energy, reduce the voltage stress on critical components, largely reduce the circuit size, and increase the overall conversion efficiency. The proposed design satisfies the requirements of a high voltage gain ratio, high conversion efficiency, low component voltage stress, and simple control in green energy circuit systems.

2. Operating Principles of the Main Circuit

Figure 2 shows the proposed novel, non-isolated, cascade-type single-switch high step-up DC/DC converter. The main circuit components are composed of a switch (S), the primary magnetizing inductance (Lm), magnetizing leakage inductance (Lk1), and coupled inductors (turns ratio N1:N2:N3). A voltage multiplier circuit is composed of diodes D1 and D2, capacitors C1 and C2, coupled inductor L2, and coupled leakage inductance Lk2. Another circuit cascaded with capacitor C3 is composed of diodes D4 and D5, capacitors C4 and C5, coupled inductor L3, and coupled leakage inductance Lk3. A complete cycle of the circuits comprises five operating modes, which are analyzed as follows.
To simplify the circuit analysis, the following assumptions were postulated:
(1)
The capacitance values of C1, C2, C3, C4 and C5 are high enough to be regarded as constant power sources; and
(2)
The circuit is operated under the continuous conduction mode (CCM) and the magnetic inductance of each winding is substantially higher than the leakage.
In accordance with these assumptions, the steady-state waveform patterns of the primary operating signals of the converter were operated under the CCM and shown in Figure 3. Figure 4 shows the operating patterns of each mode.

2.1. Mode I (t0 ≤ t < t1)

When t = t0, the S, D1 and D4 are turned on, whereas D2, D3 and D5 are turned off. The current pathway is depicted in Figure 4a. In this mode, the Vin stores energy through Lm and Lk1, yielding a linear rise of the inductive current. At the turn-on transient of S, Lk2, and Lk3 of N2 and N3 continuously release energy to C1 and C4 through D1 and D4, the cascade of C3, C4 and C5 transmits energy to the output load (RL) until the currents id1 and id4 = 0. When t = t1, this operating region ends and progresses into the next mode.

2.2. Mode II (t1 ≤ t < t2)

In this operating region, the S, D2 and D5 are turned on continuously, whereas D1, D3 and D4 are turned off. The current pathway is depicted in Figure 4b. In this mode, the Vin stores energy through Lm and Lk1, yielding a linear rise of the inductive current. Meanwhile, coupled inductors based on turns ratios N21 and N31 and through D2 and D5 release energy to C2 and C5 in a forward manner. The cascade of C3, C4 and C5 transmits energy to the RL. When t = t2, this operating region ends and progresses into the next mode.

2.3. Mode III (t2 ≤ t < t3)

In this operating region, when t = t2, the S is turned off transiently. Since the inductive voltage has a continuous current characteristic and cannot be changed instantaneously, D2, D3 and D5 are turned on, whereas D1 and D4 are turned off. The current pathway is depicted in Figure 4c. In this mode, the Vin is connected to VC1 and VC2 in series and transmits energy to C3 through D3. As D2 and D5 are switched on, the coupled inductors maintain leakage currents iLk2, iLk3, from which energy is continuously released to C2 and C5 as the means to recover leakage. The cascade of C3, C4 and C5 transmits energy to the RL. When the t = t3, this operating region ends and enters the next mode.

2.4. Mode IV (t3 ≤ t < t4)

When t = t3, S is permanently turned off and D1, D3 and D4 are turned on, whereas D5 is turned off. The current pathway is depicted in Figure 4d. In this mode, because the preceding mode releases energy continuously until currents iLk2 and iLk3 reach zero, the polarity of the coupled inductors is reversed. The energy at N1 is transmitted through a flyback method and switched on through D1 and D4 to C1 and C4, thereby increasing id1 and id4. The Vin is continuously connected to VC1 and VC2 in series to transmit energy to C3 through D3. At the output end, similarly, the cascade of C3, C4 and C5 transmits energy to the RL until the iLk1 current reaches zero. When t = t4, this operating region ends and progresses into the next mode.

2.5. Mode V (t4 ≤ t < t5)

In this operating region, the S is turned off permanently. The Vin becomes an open circuit because of the zero iLk1 current. D1 and D4 are on, whereas D2, D3 and D5 are off. The current pathway is depicted in Figure 4e. In this mode, the Lm couples energy into C1 and C4 through the coupled inductors. Since the magnetizing inductance is the only source that supplies the required energy, the magnetizing inductance current iLm and id1 and id2 continue to drop until t = t5. Upon the conclusion of this operating region, a complete switching cycle TS is achieved.

3. Steady-State Analysis

In this section, discussion and analysis of the voltage gain ratio and switching stress of components are provided. The results are then compared with those of previous studies. To simplify the circuit analysis, the following assumptions were postulated:
(1)
The capacitance values of C1, C2, C3, C4 and C5 are high enough to be regarded as constant power sources;
(2)
The S, D1, D2, D3, D4 and D5 are ideal circuit elements;
(3)
The magnetizing inductance of each winding is substantially higher than the leakage, which can, thus, be ignored; and
(4)
The converter is operated under the CCM.

3.1. Step-Up Conversion Ratio

With the S turned on, the node voltage analysis based on Kirchhoff’s voltage law (KVL) applied to Mode II, shown in Figure 4b, yields the following equations of voltage stress of the inductance and capacitors:
VinVL1 = 0
VC2 = N21 × VL1
VC5 = N31 × VL1
where N21 = N2:N1 and N31 = N3:N1.
When the S is off, KVL applied to Mode VI, shown in Figure 4e, can be used to determine the voltage stress of the inductance and capacitors as expressed in the following equations:
VC3 = Vin + VC1 + VC2VL1
VC1 = N2 × VL1
VC4 = N31 × VL1
In accordance with a voltage-second balance principle between the on-off transients of each inductance, the following equations were derived:
0 D T s V L 1 d t + D T s T s V L 1 d t = 0
V c 1 = N 21 × D V i n 1 D
V c 2 = N 21 × V i n
V c 3 = ( 1 + D + N 21 ) × V i n 1 D
V c 4 = N 31 × D V i n 1 D
V c 5 = N 31 × V i n
Since VO = VC3 + VC4 + VC5, substituting Equations (10)–(12) into the equation can render a voltage gain ratio of converters, as expressed in Equation (13):
V O V i n = 1 + D + ( N 3 / N 1 ) + ( N 2 / N 1 ) 1 D
The voltage gain ratio curve obtained from Equation (13) is shown in Figure 5. Under identical duty cycles, the proposed converter provided a higher step-up ratio than did conventional step-up converters at a turns ratio of n = 1.

3.2. Component Voltage Stress

By using the on-off transients, the voltage stress on circuit elements can be calculated. The switch on-off state of Mode II in Figure 4b can be applied to calculate the voltage stress on the S and D1, D3, and D4. The corresponding equations are expressed as follows:
V s w i t c h = 1 1 D V i n
V D 1 = V C 1 + V L 2 = N 2 1 D × V i n
V D 3 = V C 3 V C 2 V C 1 = 1 + D 1 D × V i n
V D 4 = V C 4 + V L 3 = N 3 1 D × V i n
When the S of Mode VI in Figure 4d is off, the voltage stress on D2 and D5 are calculated using Equations (18) and (19), as follows:
V D 5 = V C 4 + V C 5 = N 3 1 D × V i n
V D 2 = V C 1 + V C 2 = N 2 1 D × V i n

3.3. Loss Analysis

Performing a loss analysis is a critical step in circuit design. By performing reasonable calculations and evaluations of the power loss characteristics of circuit elements, designers can efficiently design circuits without wasting time on wrong design directions. Loss analysis is discussed in two sections of this paper, separated into loss analysis of individual elements during operation and the estimated conversion efficiency of the entire system.

3.3.1. Switch Element (S)

The loss of the S primarily depends on conduction loss and switching loss, which involves driver loss, turn-on, and turn-off transient loss. The loss value is determined by summing Equations (20)–(23), where Tr represents the rise time of the switch and Tf represents the fall time of the switch.
Pconduction-loss = Iload2 × RDS(on)
Pdriver-loss = 16/3 × Cgs × Vin × fsw
Pturn_on-loss = 1/2 × Tr × Iload × Vin × fsw
Pturn_off-loss = 1/2 × Tf × Iload × Vin × fsw

3.3.2. Magnetic Energy Storage Element (L)

This element comprises copper and core losses. The copper losses refer to losses caused by current I flowing through wire equivalent impedance R on a transformer or inductor winding, as expressed in Equation (24). The core losses, or iron losses, can be categorized into hysteresis losses and eddy-current losses. Affected by varying magnetic fields, hysteresis losses cause partial energy losses inside the iron core through thermal dissipation. Eddy-current losses involve the cyclic current (i.e., eddy current) generated within a conductor caused by varying induction of the magnetic field. The energy of eddy currents dissipates through heat transference when passing through the resistance of iron core materials. The eddy-current loss and area of current cycle are positively correlated.
Pcopper-loss = Iload2 × R

3.3.3. Capacitor (C)

The capacitor presents two major loss factors, namely, equivalent series resistance (ESR) and leakage current. When aluminum electrolytic capacitors are operated, leakage current definitely occurs. When the leakage current flows through the internal resistance Rc in the capacitor, losses are generated. The leakage current should be minimized. The equation to calculate leakage currents is expressed in Equation (25):
Ileakage = K × C × V
where I is the leakage current (μA) and K is the constant set for production.

3.3.4. Diode (D)

Although diodes are unidirectional conducted elements, power losses occur in forward conduction and reverse-bias blocking. In forward conduction, a junction potential barrier Vf occurs to lower the voltage; when current Iload flows through the potential barrier, power losses occur, as expressed in Equation (26):
Pforward-loss = Vf × Iload × D
where D represents a duty cycle. In addition, parasitic series resistance (Rd) exists in the diodes and can cause power losses when the Iload flows through it. The equation is expressed in Equation (27):
PRd-loss = Iload2 × Rd × D
When the diodes are in the reverse-bias blocking state, they may have a reverse recovery that prevents the currents from returning to zero transiently during cut off; instead, the current maintains a reverse flow for a certain period before returning to zero. Such current is called reverse recover current (Irm) and the period during which it occurs is called the reverse recovery time (Trr). The area resembling an inverse triangle formed by Irm and the Trr is called the reverse storage charge (Qrr). Without appropriate recycling mechanisms, the energy accumulates and cause losses, as expressed in Equation (28):
P d r r - l o s s = 1 2 T r r × I n n × V R × f s w
where fsw is the switching frequency and VR is the reverse-bias voltage of the diode.
In the proposed structure, reverse recovery losses are absent because the capacitors in the circuit recycle and store the energy. Table 1 lists the expected loss assessment of components under a power loading of 450 W. The values were calculated without considering eddy-current losses, Rd, and capacitor losses. The total impedance of the winding was set to 60 mΩ, resistance of switching conduction RDS(on) as 10 mΩ, diode Vf as 0.55 V, and fs as 50 kHz for calculation. In this paper, the measurement device was limited, so component power losses were roughly estimated. We neglected some difficult evaluation parameters (for example. eddy-current, capacitance ESR, print circuit board (PCB) (parasitic impedance losses, and capacitance impedance losses, etc.), and the full load efficiency estimation compared with measurement can meet within ±1%. The total component power losses of the system were much smaller than the system power.

3.3.5. Estimated Conversion Efficiency Analysis

In the analysis presented in this subsection, diode Trr, coupled coefficient losses and leakage of coupled inductance, and equivalent series inductance of electrolytic capacitors were ignored. The parasitic effects of elements that were considered were the parasitic internal resistance of coupled inductance (rL1, rL2 and rL3), the forward conduction voltage drop of diodes (VD1, VD2, VD3, VD4 and VD5), the series internal resistance of diodes (rD1, rD2, rD3, rD4 and rD5), the ESR of capacitors (rC1, rC2, rC3, rC4 and rC5), and the internal RDS, as depicted in Figure 6.
To simplify the analysis, temporary recycle pathways caused by leakage and equivalent resistance of capacitors were ignored. Only the on and off states of the switch were considered. Subsequently, the voltage-second balance, small-ripple approximation, and capacitor-charge balance principles were applied to calculate the circuit conversion efficiency, as expressed in Equation (29). The efficiency was the ratio of the output power (Po) to the input power, as expressed in Equation (30):
V o V i n = ( n 2 D + 2 n 3 D + D 1 D ) ( V D 1 + V D 2 + V D 3 + V D 4 + V D 5 ) V i n 1 + ( A R L × ( 1 D ) 2 ) + ( B R L × ( 1 D ) ) + ( C R L × ( 1 D ) ) + ( D R L )
A = ( 1 + n 2 D ) r D 3 + r C 3 ( 1 + D ) + ( r C 1 + r C 5 ) D + ( 1 D ) ( r C 2 + r C 4 ) B = n 3 ( 1 D ) r L 3 + ( r D 1 + r D 5 ) D + ( 1 D ) C = ( 1 + n 2 ) D × r L 2 + ( r D 2 + r D 4 ) ( 1 D ) D = ( 1 + n 2 + n 3 ) × ( r d s + r L 1 ) η = ( 1 D ) ( n 2 + 2 n 3 D + D 1 D ) ( V D 1 + V D 2 + V D 3 + V D 4 + V D 5 ) V i n ( 2 n 3 D + D ) [ 1 + ( A R L × ( 1 D ) 2 ) + ( B R L × ( 1 D ) ) + ( C R L × ( 1 D ) ) + ( D R L ) ]
where the values of rL1rL3 are assumed to be 50 mΩ, rD1rD5 as 20 mΩ, RDS as 10 mΩ, rC1rC5 as 20 mΩ, diode conduction voltage drop as 0.55 V, Vin as 40 V, output voltage as 400 V, and RL as 355.56 Ω. The relationship among efficiency, gain ratio, and duty cycle is shown in Figure 7.
A desirable step-up ratio was approximately 1:10. The curves in Figure 7 reveal that the turns ratio of n = 1:2:2 should be applied in consideration of optimal circuit design points. At this ratio, the duty cycle of the S is approximately 0.5, rendering an efficiency of 95% or higher.

3.4. Comparison of the Proposed Structure with Extant Structures

The aforementioned characteristics of the single-switch high step-up converter of the proposed structure were compared with those in [9,16,21], as tabulated in Table 2. In Table 2, n2 represents the ratio of coils N2 to N1; n3 represents the ratio of N3 to N1; and D represents the operating duty cycle ratio. The voltage gain comparison in Table 2 is depicted in Figure 5, where the turns ratio is N1:N2:N3 = 1:2:2.
Figure 8 reveals that the systems of [9,16,21], and the proposed structure renders more than a 10-fold increase of voltage at D = 0.5–0.6. Although the step-up ratio of [9] exhibited an exponential increase with the increase in the control cycle, the cascade structure was unsuitable for overly high duty cycle ratios because of efficiency problems.
Figure 9 shows the comparison of switch voltage stresses of structures listed in Table 2. At D = 0.75 or lower, the proposed structure has lower switch voltage stresses compared with the other three structures.
Figure 10 depicts the comparison of diode voltage stresses. At D = 0.8 or lower, the proposed structure has lower voltage stress than do the other three structures.

4. Experiment Results

Figure 11 reveals a block diagram of system hardware and software planning. A microcontroller RX62T (Renesas, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was employed as the basis of system control. Through digitized control, the problems of an overly complex hardware circuit and difficulty in designing the control circuit caused by the massive use of analog circuits can be avoided.
Figure 12 shows the picture of the experimental prototype circuit.
The electrical specification and element parameters of the circuit are tabulated in Table 3.
Figure 13 reveals the operating waveforms of each element measured under the power loading of 450 W: (a) S waveform and inductive current waveform; (b) D1D3 voltage waveform; (c) D4 and D5 voltage waveform; (d) D1D3 current waveform; (e) D4 and D5 current waveform; and (f) voltage waveform of C1, C3, C4, and output. From the experimental waveforms of Figure 13 compared with the steady-state analysis before, the proposed converter had been proved that the component voltage stress of the active switch and diodes are less than 100 V, and was consistent with the results of steady-state analysis.
Figure 14 shows the comparison of efficiency curves of the proposed converter and those presented in previous studies. The Vin, output voltage, and output power for the proposed converter were 40 V, 400 V and 450 W, respectively. The output power of [9,16,21] were only 200, 400 and 300 W, respectively. These curves were measured under a distinct Po. Under a light-load Po of 50 W, the proposed structure yielded a 94.511% efficiency. Under a full-load Po of 450 W, the efficiency became 93.2%. The optimal efficiency (95.346%) was reached under a Po of 250 W. The efficiency under all power conditions was higher than 93%.
Table 4 shows the weight efficiency of the proposed converter based on California Energy Commission (CEC) standard [28], the results show the converter reached 94.6% weight efficiency at the nominal input voltage.

5. Conclusions

In the present study, a high step-up DC/DC converter with coupled inductance and voltage multipliers was developed. Through operating principles, steady-state analysis, and final test results, the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed converter were validated. Applying the design of a single switch and coupled inductance with an integrated common core can substantially simplify the control circuit and reduce costs, while maintaining the effect of high step-up ratios. In addition, the proposed converter can recycle leakage, thereby minimizing the reverse voltage stress of the switch and diodes. Consequently, the switching losses can be reduced. Meanwhile, low-conduction loss elements can be flexibly selected to lower the conduction losses and improve the converter efficiency. In accordance with the experiment results, the converter efficiency reached 93.16% and 95.35% under the output power conditions of 450 W and 250 W, respectively. Obviously the proposed converter is advantageous for integrating high efficiency, simple structure, and high voltage gain ratios.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank their student, Kuo-Chan Huang, for his suggestions for this research.

Author Contributions

These authors contributed equally to this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kyoto Protocol. Available online: http://www.kyotoprotocol.com (accessed on 16 February 2005).
  2. Paris Agreement—European Commission. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/international/negotiations/paris/index_en.htm (accessed on 1 December 2015).
  3. Bin, G.; Jason, D.; Jih-Sheng, L.; Zheng, Z.; Chuang, L. High boost ratio hybrid transformer DC-DC converter for photovoltaic module applications. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2013, 28, 2048–2049. [Google Scholar]
  4. Akın, B. An improved ZVT–ZCT PWM DC-DC boost converter with increased efficiency. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2014, 29, 1919–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shen, C.-L.; Chen, H.-Y.; Chiu, P.-C. Integrated three-voltage-booster DC-DC converter to achieve high voltage gain with leakage-energy recycling for PV or fuel-cell power systems. Energies 2015, 8, 9843–9859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tseng, S.-Y.; Wang, H.-Y. A photovoltaic power system using a high step-up converter for DC load applications. Energies 2013, 6, 1068–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lai, C.-M. Development of a novel bidirectional DC/DC converter topology with high voltage conversion ratio for electric vehicles and DC-microgrids. Energies 2016, 9, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lai, C.-M.; Yang, M.-J. A high-gain three-port power converter with fuel cell, battery sources and stacked output for hybrid electric vehicles and DC-microgrids. Energies 2016, 9, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, S.M.; Liang, T.J.; Yang, L.S.; Chen, J.F. A cascaded high step-up DC–DC converter with single switch for microsource applications. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2011, 26, 1146–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, W.; He, X. Review of nonisolated high-step-up DC/DC converters in photovoltaic grid-connected applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2011, 58, 1239–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ismail, E.H.; Al-Saffar, M.A.; Sabzali, A.J. High conversion ratio DC-DC converters with reduced switch stress. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I 2008, 55, 2139–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huber, L.; Jovanovic, M.M. A design approach for server power supplies for networking applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, USA, 6–10 February 2000; pp. 1163–1169.
  13. Wu, T.F.; Yu, T.H. Unified approach to developing single-stage power converters. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 1998, 34, 211–223. [Google Scholar]
  14. Li, W.; Lv, X.; Deng, Y.; He, X. A review of non-isolated high step-up DC/DC converter in renewable energy applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, Washington, DC, USA, 15–19 February 2009; pp. 364–369.
  15. Law, K.K.; Cheng, K.W.; Yeung, Y.P. Design and analysis of switched-capacitor-based step-up resonant converters. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I 2005, 52, 943–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lin, M.S.; Yang, L.S.; Liang, T.J. Study and implementation of a single switch cascading high step-up DC-DC converter. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Power Electronics, Jeju, Korea, 30 May–3 June 2011; pp. 2565–2572.
  17. Luo, F.L. Positive output Luo converter: Voltage lift technique. IEEE Electr. Power Appl. 1999, 146, 415–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Luo, F.L.; Ye, H. Positive output super-lift converters. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2003, 18, 105–113. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wu, G.; Ruan, X.; Ye, Z. Nonisolated high step-up DC–DC converters adopting switched-capacitor cell. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2015, 62, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhao, Q.; Tao, F.; Lee, F.C. A front-end DC/DC converter for network server applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 17–21 June 2001; Volume 3, pp. 1535–1539.
  21. Wai, R.J.; Duan, R.Y. High step-up converter with coupled-inductor. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2005, 20, 1025–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Amirbande, M.; Yari, K.; Forouzesh, M.; Baghramian, A. A novel single switch high gain DC-DC converter employing coupled inductor and diode capacitor. In Proceedings of the 2016 7th Power Electronics and Drive Systems Technologies Conference (PEDSTC), Tehran, Iran, 16–18 February 2016; pp. 159–164.
  23. Zhao, Q.; Lee, F.C. High performance coupled-inductor DC-DC converters. In Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 9–13 February 2003; Volume 1, pp. 109–113.
  24. Baek, J.W.; Ryoo, M.H.; Kim, T.J.; Yoo, D.W.; Kim, J.S. High boost converter using voltage multiplier. In Proceedings of the. IEEE Industrial Electronics Society conference, Raleigh, NC, USA, 6–10 November 2005; pp. 567–572.
  25. Ajami, A.; Ardi, H.; Farakhor, A. A novel high step-up DC/DC converter based on integrating coupled inductor and switched-capacitor techniques for renewable energy applications. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2015, 30, 4255–4263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wai, R.J.; Liu, L.W.; Duan, R.Y. High-efficiency voltage-clamped DC-DC converter with reduced reverse-recovery current and switch voltage stress. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2006, 53, 272–280. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wu, X.; Zhang, J.; Ye, X.; Qian, Z. A family of non-isolated ZVS DC–DC converter based on a new active clamp cell. In Proceedings of the IEE Industrial Electronics Society conference, Raleigh, NC, USA, 6–10 November 2005.
  28. Lai, C.-M.; Lin, Y.-C.; Lee, D. Study and implementation of a two-phase interleaved bidirectional DC/DC converter for vehicle and DC-microgrid systems. Energies 2015, 8, 9969–9991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Block diagram of application of vehicular green energy systems. PV: photovoltaics; and MPPT: maximum power point tracking.
Figure 1. Block diagram of application of vehicular green energy systems. PV: photovoltaics; and MPPT: maximum power point tracking.
Energies 09 00772 g001
Figure 2. The novel, cascade-type single-switch, high step-up converter with coupled inductors.
Figure 2. The novel, cascade-type single-switch, high step-up converter with coupled inductors.
Energies 09 00772 g002
Figure 3. Operating waveform patterns in the continuous conduction mode (CCM).
Figure 3. Operating waveform patterns in the continuous conduction mode (CCM).
Energies 09 00772 g003
Figure 4. Mode operating under CCM: (a) Mode I; (b) Mode II; (c) Mode III; (d) Mode IV; and (e) Mode V.
Figure 4. Mode operating under CCM: (a) Mode I; (b) Mode II; (c) Mode III; (d) Mode IV; and (e) Mode V.
Energies 09 00772 g004
Figure 5. Converter voltage gain ratio curves with different turns ratios.
Figure 5. Converter voltage gain ratio curves with different turns ratios.
Energies 09 00772 g005
Figure 6. Equivalent model circuit of efficiency analysis.
Figure 6. Equivalent model circuit of efficiency analysis.
Energies 09 00772 g006
Figure 7. Relationship between efficiency and voltage gain vs. duty cycle.
Figure 7. Relationship between efficiency and voltage gain vs. duty cycle.
Energies 09 00772 g007
Figure 8. Comparison of voltage gains under identical turns ratios.
Figure 8. Comparison of voltage gains under identical turns ratios.
Energies 09 00772 g008
Figure 9. Comparison of switch voltage stresses (N1:N2:N3 = 1:1:1).
Figure 9. Comparison of switch voltage stresses (N1:N2:N3 = 1:1:1).
Energies 09 00772 g009
Figure 10. Comparison of diode voltage stresses (N1:N2:N3 = 1:1:1).
Figure 10. Comparison of diode voltage stresses (N1:N2:N3 = 1:1:1).
Energies 09 00772 g010
Figure 11. Block diagram of system hardware and software planning.
Figure 11. Block diagram of system hardware and software planning.
Energies 09 00772 g011
Figure 12. Picture of the experimental prototype circuit.
Figure 12. Picture of the experimental prototype circuit.
Energies 09 00772 g012
Figure 13. The operating waveforms of each element measured under the power loading of 450 W, (a) Vgs: 10 V/div, Vds: 50 V/div, ILK1: 25 A/div, Ids: 25 A/div, time: 5 μs/div; (b) Vgs: 10 V/div, VD1: 100 V/div, VD2: 100 V/div, VD3: 50 V/div, time: 5 μs/div; (c) Vgs: 10 V/div, VD4: 100 V/div, VD5: 100 V/div, time: 5 μs/div; (d) Vgs: 20 V/div, ID1: 5 A/div, ID2: 5 A/div, ID3: 25 A/div, time: 5 μs/div; (e) Vgs: 20 V/div, ID4: 5 A/div, ID5: 5 A/div, time: 5 μs/div; and (f) VC1: 50 V/div, VC3: 250 V/div, VC4: 50 V/div, VO: 200 V/div, time: 25 μs/div.
Figure 13. The operating waveforms of each element measured under the power loading of 450 W, (a) Vgs: 10 V/div, Vds: 50 V/div, ILK1: 25 A/div, Ids: 25 A/div, time: 5 μs/div; (b) Vgs: 10 V/div, VD1: 100 V/div, VD2: 100 V/div, VD3: 50 V/div, time: 5 μs/div; (c) Vgs: 10 V/div, VD4: 100 V/div, VD5: 100 V/div, time: 5 μs/div; (d) Vgs: 20 V/div, ID1: 5 A/div, ID2: 5 A/div, ID3: 25 A/div, time: 5 μs/div; (e) Vgs: 20 V/div, ID4: 5 A/div, ID5: 5 A/div, time: 5 μs/div; and (f) VC1: 50 V/div, VC3: 250 V/div, VC4: 50 V/div, VO: 200 V/div, time: 25 μs/div.
Energies 09 00772 g013
Figure 14. Comparison of converter efficiency curves.
Figure 14. Comparison of converter efficiency curves.
Energies 09 00772 g014
Table 1. Assessment of component power losses under 450 W power loading.
Table 1. Assessment of component power losses under 450 W power loading.
ComponentLoss CalculationUnit
Switch Conduction Loss2.166W
Switch Switching Loss1.726W
Inductor Copper Loss12.612W
Inductor Iron Loss0.28W
Total Diode Loss7.324W
Total24.108W
Calculated Efficiency94.642%-
Measured Efficiency93.159%-
Table 2. Comparison of studies regarding the single-switch high step-up converters.
Table 2. Comparison of studies regarding the single-switch high step-up converters.
Comparison of StudiesVoltage Gain RatioSwitch Voltage StressDiode Voltage StressNumber of CapacitorsNumber of InductorsNumber of Diodes
Proposed structure 1 + D + n 2 + n 3 1 D V i n 1 D n 2 × V i n 1 D 535
Reference [9] 2 + n + n D 1 D V i n 1 D ( 1 + n ) V i n 1 D 424
Reference [16] 1 + n 2 × D ( 1 D ) 2 ( 1 + n 2 ) V i n 1 D V o + n 3 V i n 334
Reference [21] 1 + n D ( 1 D ) 2 V o 1 + n D n V o 1 + n D 324
Table 3. Electrical specification and components of the experimental circuit.
Table 3. Electrical specification and components of the experimental circuit.
ParameterSpecification
Input DC Voltage Vin36–48 V
Output DC Voltage VO400 V
Max output power Po450 W
Switching frequency fs50 kHz
Coupled inductors turns ratioN1:N2:N3 = 1:2:2
ComponentModelSpecification
S1IRFP4110100 V, 120 A
D1, D2, D4, D5MBR20200200 V/20 A
D3NF020200 V/40 A
LMPPRing core125 μH
C1, C2MPP Film Capacitor10 μF/100 V
C3Electrolytic Capacitor300 μF/400 V
C4, C5MPP Film Capacitor22 μF/100 V
Table 4. The weight efficiency of proposed converter.
Table 4. The weight efficiency of proposed converter.
VinLoadWeight Efficiency
10%20%30%50%75%100%
36 V94.01894.28794.44194.60893.98392.64894.119
40 V94.44794.76895.08695.26894.37593.15994.610
48 V94.83695.32295.48295.71294.89893.54195.090
-4%5%12%21%53%5%-

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, Y.-E.; Wu, Y.-L. Design and Implementation of a High Efficiency, Low Component Voltage Stress, Single-Switch High Step-Up Voltage Converter for Vehicular Green Energy Systems. Energies 2016, 9, 772. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9100772

AMA Style

Wu Y-E, Wu Y-L. Design and Implementation of a High Efficiency, Low Component Voltage Stress, Single-Switch High Step-Up Voltage Converter for Vehicular Green Energy Systems. Energies. 2016; 9(10):772. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9100772

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Yu-En, and Yu-Lin Wu. 2016. "Design and Implementation of a High Efficiency, Low Component Voltage Stress, Single-Switch High Step-Up Voltage Converter for Vehicular Green Energy Systems" Energies 9, no. 10: 772. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9100772

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop