Next Article in Journal
Small Gold Nanorods: Recent Advances in Synthesis, Biological Imaging, and Cancer Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Surface Modification of Carbon Nanotubes with an Enhanced Antifungal Activity for the Control of Plant Fungal Pathogen
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/ma10121376
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication and Characterization of Porous MgAl2O4 Ceramics via a Novel Aqueous Gel-Casting Process

by
Lei Yuan
1,*,
Zongquan Liu
1,
Zhenli Liu
1,
Xiao He
1,
Beiyue Ma
1,*,
Qiang Zhu
2 and
Jingkun Yu
1
1
School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
2
Electron Microscope Unit, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2032, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2017, 10(12), 1376; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10121376
Submission received: 6 November 2017 / Revised: 18 November 2017 / Accepted: 18 November 2017 / Published: 30 November 2017
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A novel and aqueous gel-casting process has been successfully developed to fabricate porous MgAl2O4 ceramics by using hydratable alumina and MgO powders as raw materials and deionized water as hydration agent. The effects of different amounts of deionized water on the hydration properties, apparent porosity, bulk density, microstructure, pore size distribution and compressive strength of the samples were investigated. The results indicated that the porosity and the microstructure of porous MgAl2O4 ceramics were governed by the amounts of deionized water added. The porous structure was formed by the liberation of physisorbed water and the decomposition of hydration products such as bayerite, brucite and boehmite. After determining the addition amounts of deionized water, the fabricated porous MgAl2O4 ceramics had a high apparent porosity (52.5–65.8%), a small average pore size structure (around 1–3 μm) and a relatively high compressive strength (12–28 MPa). The novel aqueous gel-casting process with easy access is expected to be a promising candidate for the preparation of Al2O3-based porous ceramics.

1. Introduction

Porous MgAl2O4 spinel ceramics have attracted a growing interest due to their high melting point (2135 °C), good thermal shock resistance, excellent chemical inertness, and their low thermal conductivity and thermal expansion coefficient; they are widely used for various applications such as gas filters, thermal insulation materials, waste water filters, catalyst supports and separation membranes [1,2,3,4,5]. In order to meet specific requirements of porosity and pore sizes for different applications, various available methods have been developed in recent years, including gel casting, the addition of pore-forming agent, sacrificial templating, in-situ synthesis, and combustion synthesis [6,7,8,9,10]. Among these, gel casting has been regarded as one of the most useful methods for fabricating porous MgAl2O4 ceramics, because it is feasible to obtain materials with complex shapes. However, large volumes of organic compounds are used, and the protection of nitrogen is required during the gel-casting process [11,12]. These organic compounds include monomers, catalysts, initiators and cross-linking agents, which are usually poisonous.
In order to overcome these problems, researchers have developed some less- or non-toxic organic compounds for use as gelling agents, including epoxy resin, gelatin, protein, N,N-dimethylacrylamide (DMAA) and carboxymethyl cellulose [13,14,15,16,17,18]. The results of this research have been extremely valuable for the development of the gel-casting process, aside from a few small disadvantages. For example, these gelling agents are also organic compounds, which will release CO2 or hydrocarbon gases during the heating process of green bodies. Meanwhile, the cost of organic compounds is expensive, and the process of gel casting is relatively complex. Therefore, an absolutely aqueous and more feasible gel-casting process without any organic compounds is desirable for the fabrication of porous MgAl2O4 ceramics.
Hydratable alumina (ρ-Al2O3) is a transition alumina, which is generally produced from flash calcination of gibbsite. After contact with water, ρ-Al2O3 can undergo hydration to generate binding ability [19,20,21]. During the hydration process, firstly, a large amount of gel is formed; and then part of the gel is transformed as bayerite (Al(OH)3), with small amounts of boehmite (AlO(OH)) crystals. Simultaneously, the other gel is present as boehmite gel, ultimately accompanied by amorphous gel [19]. The binding strength of the green body is determined by the interlocking bayerite crystal and gel [22]. As a result, ρ-Al2O3 is always used as a binder in cement-free refractory castables [23,24,25].
Thereby, in combination with the gel-casting process, when introducing ρ-Al2O3 as the gelling source, it is expected that a novel method for fabricating porous ceramics will result. This is because the hydration of ρ-Al2O3 can form gels to bind the green body, and small amounts of water can also be enclosed in the green body by the interlocking gels. Subsequently, after drying and heating, a porous structure is obtained due to the liberation of physisorbed water and the ultimate decomposition of the gels. Hence, an absolutely aqueous gel-casting process will be developed for preparing porous ceramics. However, to our knowledge, there have been limited reports on the fabrication of porous ceramics using ρ-Al2O3 as a gelling source so far [26].
In the current study, an aqueous gel-casting process has been successfully developed for fabricating porous MgAl2O4 ceramic by utilizing ρ-Al2O3 and MgO powders as raw materials and deionized water as a hydration agent. The presence of MgO powder can accelerate the hydration of ρ-Al2O3 to enhance the strength of the green body [27,28]. Furthermore, the porosity of the as-fabricated porous MgAl2O4 ceramics can be controlled by the amounts of deionized water added. Therefore, the effects of ρ-Al2O3 and the amount of deionized water on the properties of porous MgAl2O4 ceramic, in terms of hydration properties, phase composition, porosity, microstructure, pores size and compressive strength, have been investigated and discussed in detail.

2. Experimental

2.1. Raw Materials and Preparation Process

Commercial ρ-Al2O3 (Purity ≥ 90%, LOI (Loss on ignition) ≤ 10%, d50 ≤ 1 μm, Zhengzhou Non-ferrous Metals Research Institute Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, China) and MgO powders (Purity ≥ 99%, d50 ≤ 1 μm, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) were used as the starting raw materials. Deionized water was used as hydration agent.
In order to form stoichiometric MgAl2O4 in the as-fabricated porous ceramics, and in consideration of the purity of ρ-Al2O3, the weight ratio of MgO and ρ-Al2O3 was chosen as 1:2.85. The weight ratios of raw materials of samples are listed in Table 1.
Various amounts of MgO and ρ-Al2O3 were initially fully mixed as the starting powders. Then, the deionized water was added to the starting powders to prepare aqueous slurry. The weight ratios of the starting powders and deionized water were 1:1 (S1), 1:1.5 (S2), 1:2 (S3) and 1:2.5 (S4), respectively. Vigorous mechanical stirring and ultrasonic shaking (Frequency of 40 KHz) were applied for 30 min to guarantee uniform dispersion. After degassing under vacuum conditions for 10 min, the prepared gels were placed into cylindrical molds (φ27 mm) and cured at 25 °C with relative humidity of 85% for 24 h. Finally, after drying at room temperature for 72 h, the green bodies (about φ25 mm) were removed from molds, and subsequently sintered at 1600 °C for 4 h with a heating rate of 1 °C/min over the range from room temperature to 600 °C, and at 4 °C/min from 600 °C to 1600 °C.

2.2. Characterization

Apparent porosity and bulk density were determined by the Archimedes method using water as the medium. All characterizations were performed in triplicate. Thermogravimetry and differential scanning calorimeter (TG-DSC) curves were measured by simultaneous thermal analyzer (STA449F3, NETZSCH, Waldkraiburg, Germany) at a heating rate of 4 °C/min. The phase compositions of the dried green bodies and as-fabricated porous ceramics were identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Model D500, Siemens, Munich, Germany) using Cu Kα radiation. The microstructure and morphology of the porous ceramics were observed by field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, Model Ultra Plus, ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with an energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS, Oxford, UK) unit. The pore size distribution of the samples was examined by mercury porosimetry (Autopore IV9500, Micromeritics Instrument Corp., Norcross, GA, USA). Compressive strength was measured by using hydraulic press machine (5015 type, Shijin Corp., Jinan, China) according to GB/T 5072-2008 at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Hydration Properties

Figure 1 shows XRD patterns of the dried green bodies with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water.
In the initial raw materials, ρ-Al2O3 is amorphous phase and MgO is periclase phase. After adding deionized water to form gels and casting, the phase composition of the green bodies was obviously changed. It can be seen that there were MgO (Ref. code: 01-075-1525), brucite (Mg(OH)2, Ref. code: 00-001-1169), boehmite (Ref. code: 01-083-2384) and bayerite (Ref. code: 01-077-0250) phases in all of the samples. That is to say, hydration reactions had occurred in the gel-casting process. When the ratio of starting powders and deionized water was 1:1, ρ-Al2O3 reacted with water to form boehmite and bayerite, and a certain amount of MgO to form brucite, as shown in reactions (1) and (2), respectively.
ρ-Al2O3 + 2H2O → AlO(OH) + Al(OH)3
MgO + H2O → Mg(OH)2
With an increase in the amount of deionized water added, the relative intensity of the MgO peak decreased obviously. This indicates that the amounts of hydration products like Mg(OH)2 increased gradually. The intensity of brucite, boehmite and bayerite peaks did not obviously increase. The main reason for this was that the crystallization degrees of brucite, boehmite and bayerite were low, resulting in the relatively low intensity of the peaks.
Figure 2 compares the TG-DSC curves of the dried green bodies with ratios of starting powders and deionized water of 1:1 and 1:2.5. The resulting TG curves show that the weight losses were about 26.2% and 33.3% for samples S1 and S4, respectively. This can be attributed to the liberation of physisorbed water and the decomposition of boehmite, brucite and bayerite. The reason for the higher weight loss of S4 than of S1 was that greater amounts of physisorbed water and hydration products were formed because of the addition of greater amounts of deionized water. After calculation on the basis of reactions (1) and (2), the theoretical weight gain of the samples after hydration was 37.82%. The weight losses of all the samples were lower than the theoretical weight gains of the hydration reactions. This indicates that the starting powders were hydrated incompletely. These results are also consistent with the XRD results in Figure 1.
It can be seen from the DSC curves that there are endothermic peaks appearing at around 90 °C, 185 °C, 250 °C, 375 °C and 500 °C in both sample S1 and S4. The endothermic peaks of 90 °C and 185 °C can be attributed to the liberation of physisorbed water and the decomposition of pseudo-boehmite, respectively [19]. As the heating temperature increased, the decomposition of bayerite and brucite occurred at about 250 °C and 375 °C, respectively. In addition, the weak endothermic peaks at about 500 °C can be explained by the decomposition of crystalline boehmite. These results prove that physisorbed water and the hydration products of brucite, boehmite and bayerite were present in the green bodies. Simultaneously, the intensity of the endothermic peaks in sample S4 are obviously higher than those of sample S1. An explanation for this could be that a higher degree of hydration occurred, forming greater amounts of hydration products in sample S4.

3.2. Phase Composition and Sintering Behaviors

Figure 3 shows XRD patterns of the samples with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water sintered at 1600 °C for 4 h. It can be observed that only MgAl2O4 spinel phases were detected in all the samples. In this case, the following chemical reactions were likely to have occurred during the sintering process.
2Al(OH)3 = Al2O3 + 3H2O
2AlO(OH) = Al2O3 + H2O
Mg(OH)2 = MgO + H2O
Al2O3 + MgO = MgAl2O4
When the green bodies were submitted to sintering, the hydration products were firstly decomposed, and subsequently formed MgAl2O4. Meanwhile, a large number of pores formed in the MgAl2O4 ceramics.
The apparent porosity and bulk density of the samples with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water sintered at 1600 °C for 4 h are shown in Figure 4. It can be seen that the apparent porosity of the as-fabricated porous MgAl2O4 ceramics reached a range of about 52.5% to 65.8%. The apparent porosity of all of the samples increased, and bulk density decreased markedly with increased addition of deionized water. For the sample with a ratio of starting powders to deionized water of 1:2.5, the apparent porosity was 65.8%, and bulk density reached 1.19 g/cm3. This indicates that the physisorbed water and the extent of hydration caused by the deionized water were the main contributors to the apparent porosity. The greater the amount of deionized water that was added, the more pores were able to be constructed by the liberation of physisorbed water and the decomposition of hydration products, resulting in a higher apparent porosity. That is to say, the deionized water is not only a hydration agent, but also a pore-forming agent. However, the continuous addition of even greater amounts of deionized water to the sample was meaningless; for example, the weight percent of addition deionized water was more than 71.4%, because excess water was likely to float on the top of gels during the curing process, resulting in its having an insignificant influence on the apparent porosity of the samples.

3.3. Microstructure and Pore Size Distribution

Figure 5 shows the SEM images of the fracture surfaces of the samples of as-fabricated porous MgAl2O4 ceramics with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water, sintered at 1600 °C for 4 h. It can be seen that a porous structure was constructed by MgAl2O4 crystalline grains interlaced with each other. The porous structure was formed by two aspects: on one hand, the reaction between Al2O3 and MgO generated MgAl2O4 spinel accompanying a volume expansion of about 7% volume expansion [29]; on the other hand, the liberation of physisorbed water and the decomposition of the hydration products left a large number of pores during the sintering process. Moreover, with an increase in the amount of deionized water added, the bonding among MgAl2O4 grains was incompact, resulting in a higher apparent porosity, as shown in Figure 5 (S3,S4). In the case of the sample with a 1:1 ratio of starting powders to deionized water, the grain size of MgAl2O4 was about 0.5 μm. However, with an increased in the amount of deionized water added, the grain size of part amounts of MgAl2O4 increased obviously, reaching about 2 μm. This could be attributed to the fact that the MgO and Al2O3 that had been decomposed by the hydration products promoted the sintering activity of the green bodies. Many researchers have reported that the MgO from produced Mg(OH)2 and the Al2O3 produced from Al(OH)3 or AlO(OH) have high activity, high surface area and low activation energy, resulting in a high sintering activity [30,31,32,33]. In the current case, with the amounts of deionized water increasing, the amounts of hydration products (brucite, boehmite and bayerite) increased. That is to say, a greater amount of active MgO and Al2O3 could be obtained, resulting in a high sintering activity and the easy growth of a small amount of MgAl2O4 crystalline grains.
Figure 6 compares the pore size distribution of the as-fabricated porous MgAl2O4 ceramics with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water. It can be seen that the average pore size of all the samples is in the range of about 1 μm to 3 μm. This means that the small pore size structure of porous MgAl2O4 ceramics can be obtained using the novel aqueous gel-casting process. This is attributed to the fact that the pores of the samples were mainly formed by the liberation of physisorbed water and the decomposition of hydration products such as bayerite, boehmite and brucite. Moreover, it can be seen that the average pore size of the samples increased with the addition of increasing amounts of deionized water. The main reason for this was that the increased amounts of physisorbed water in the green body promoted the increase in pore size. Additionally, the growth of a small amount of MgAl2O4 crystalline grains led to the elimination of fine pores. These results are consistent with the microstructure of the samples. As a result, the amounts of deionized water added not only controlled the porosity, but also effected the pore size distribution of the as-fabricated porous MgAl2O4 ceramics.

3.4. Mechanical Properties

The effects of different ratios of starting powders and deionized water on the compressive strength of the as-fabricated porous MgAl2O4 ceramics are shown in Figure 7a. It can be seen that a relatively high compressive strength (12–28 MPa) was obtained in the samples. This is attributed to the fact that MgO and Al2O3 produced from the hydration products promoted the sintering activity in the samples, leading to a tight bond among the crystalline grains. In addition, with an increase in the amount of deionized water added, the compressive strength of the porous MgAl2O4 ceramics decreased markedly. This could be explained by the fact that the porosity of samples increased with increasing amounts of added deionized water. The relation between bulk density (ρb) and compressive strength (σ) of a porous ceramic can be expressed according to the Gibson and Ashby model, as described in [34].
σ = σs·C·(ρb/ρs)n
where, σs and ρs are the strength and density of the dense ceramic, respectively. The values of σs and ρs are 1862 MPa and 3.58 g/cm3, respectively, for the current case of dense MgAl2O4 ceramics. C and n are constants with values of 0.15 and 1.5, respectively, assuming an ideal pore structure [35].
After calculating, the ideal compressive strength of the porous MgAl2O4 ceramic is shown in Figure 7a. It can be seen that the compressive strength of the present case is lower than that of the ideal strength. Subsequently, after linear fitting of the actual relative compressive strength and density with Equation (7), which is given in Figure 7b, the values of C and n were found to be 0.14 and 2.70, in the current case, respectively. In comparison with the ideal model, the different values of C and n in the present as-fabricated porous ceramics can be attributed to the different pore morphologies and pore sizes. This indicates that the strength of the MgAl2O4 porous ceramic could be further improved by optimizing its pore size and pore size distribution. However, the compressive strength was still about 12 MPa, even in the sample with a starting powder to deionized water ratio of 1:2.5. This means that the compressive strength of the as-fabricated porous MgAl2O4 ceramics is able to meet the strength requirements for most applications.

4. Conclusions

(1) A novel aqueous gel-casting process was successfully developed to fabricate porous MgAl2O4 ceramics utilizing ρ-Al2O3 and MgO powders as raw materials, and deionized water as hydration agent. A high-porosity structure with a small pore size was constructed by the fine MgAl2O4 crystalline grains.
(2) The amounts of deionized water added were the main factor governing the porosity and microstructure of the as-fabricated porous MgAl2O4 ceramics.
(3) With increasing the amounts of deionized water added, the apparent porosity of the as-fabricated porous MgAl2O4 ceramics increased markedly, and the bulk density and the compressive strength decreased. When the ratio of starting powders and deionized water was 1:2.5, the apparent porosity reached 65.8% and the compressive strength was 12 MPa.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51404056) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Grant No. N130402015, N150204021).

Author Contributions

Lei Yuan, Beiyue Ma conceived and designed the experiments; Zongquan Liu, Zhenli Liu and Xiao He performed the experiments; Qiang Zhu and Jingkun Yu analyzed the data and checked the paper; Lei Yuan wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Salomao, R.; Boas, M.O.C.V.; Pandolfelli, V.C. Porous alumina-spinel ceramics for high temperature applications. Ceram. Int. 2011, 37, 1393–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Masuda, T.; Asoh, H.; Haraguchi, S.; Ono, S. Fabrication and characterization of single phase α-alumina membranes with tunable pore diameters. Materials 2015, 8, 1350–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ganesh, I. Fabrication of magnesium aluminate (MgAl2O4) spinel foams. Ceram. Int. 2011, 37, 2237–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yan, W.; Lin, X.L.; Chen, J.F.; Li, N.; Wei, Y.W.; Han, B.Q. Effect of TiO2 addition on microstructure and strength of porous spinel (MgAl2O4) ceramics prepared from magnesite and Al(OH)3. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 618, 287–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, F.; Ye, J.K.; He, G.; Liu, G.H.; Xie, Z.P.; Li, J.T. Preparation and characterization of porous MgAl2O4 spinel ceramic supports from bauxite and magnesite. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 2077–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shahbazi, H.; Shokrollahi, H.; Alhaji, A. Optimizing the gel-casting parameters in synthesis of MgAl2O4 spinel. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 712, 732–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Honda, S.; Hashimoto, S.; Yase, S.; Daiko, Y.; Iwamoto, Y. Fabrication and thermal conductivity of highly porous alumina body from platelets with yeast fungi as a pore forming agent. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 13882–13887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hashimoto, S.; Honda, S.; Hiramatsu, T.; Iwamoto, Y. Fabrication of porous spinel (MgAl2O4) from porous alumina using a template method. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 2077–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yan, W.; Chen, J.F.; Li, N.; Qiu, W.D.; Wei, Y.W.; Han, B.Q. Preparation and characterization of porous MgO-Al2O3 refractory aggregates using an in-situ decomposition pore-forming technique. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 515–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bai, J.H.; Wei, C.C.; Meng, F.T.; Liu, J.C.; Wang, P.; Du, Q.Y.; Tang, Z.X. Fabrication of porous Al2O3-MgAl2O4 ceramics using combustion-synthesized powders containing in situ produced pore-forming agents. Mater. Lett. 2011, 65, 1559–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sepulveda, P.; Ortega, F.S.; Innocentini, M.D.M.; Pandolfelli, V.C. Properties of highly porous hydroxyapatite obtained by the gelcasting of foams. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2000, 83, 3021–3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, R.P.; Li, Y.T.; Wang, C.A.; Tie, S.N. Fabrication of porous alumina-zirconia ceramics by gel-casting and infiltration methods. Mater. Des. 2014, 63, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yuan, L.; Ma, B.Y.; Zhu, Q.; Zhang, X.D.; Zhang, H.; Yu, J.K. Preparation and properties of mullite-bonded porous fibrous mullite ceramics by an epoxy resin gel-casting process. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 5478–5483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, Z.; Sun, L.C.; Wan, P.; Wang, J.Y. Preparation, microstructure and high temperature performances of porous γ-Y2Si2O7 by in situ foam-gelcasting using gelatin. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 14230–14238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. He, X.; Zhou, X.G.; Su, B. 3D interconnective porous alumina ceramics via direct protein foaming. Mater. Lett. 2009, 63, 830–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wan, W.; Feng, Y.B.; Yang, J.; Xu, S.; Qiu, T. Preparation of mesoporous silica ceramics with relatively high strength from industrial wastes by low-toxic aqueous gel-casting. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 35, 2163–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Deng, X.G.; Wang, J.K.; Liu, J.H.; Zhang, H.J.; Li, F.L.; Duan, H.J.; Lu, L.L.; Huang, Z.; Zhao, W.G.; Zhang, S.W. Preparation and characterization of porous mullite ceramics via foam-gelcasting. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 9009–9017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Elsayed, H.; Romero, A.R.; Ferroni, L.; Gardin, C.; Zavan, B.; Bernardo, E. Bioactive glass-ceramic scaffolds from novel ‘inorganic gel casting’ and sinter-crystallization. Materials 2017, 10, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Cardoso, F.A.; Innocentini, M.D.M.; Miranda, M.F.S.; Valenzuela, F.A.O.; Pandolfelli, V.C. Drying behavior of hydratable alumina-bonded refractory castables. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2004, 24, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, W.P.; Brown, P.W. Mechanisms of reaction of hydratable aluminas. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1999, 82, 453–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, J.; Jia, Q.L.; Yan, S.; Zhang, S.M.; Liu, X.H. Microstructure and properties of hydratable alumina bonded bauxite andalusite based castables. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 310–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, Q.F.; Ye, G.T.; Zhang, C.Y.; Zhu, L.L.; Song, X.J.; Ma, J. Chemical bonding and interlocking between hydratable alumina and microsilica after drying at 110 °C and firing at 800 °C. J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49, 3331–3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Salomao, R.; Pandolfelli, V.C. The role of hydraulic binders on magnesia containing refractory castables: Calcium aluminate cement and hydratable alumina. Ceram. Int. 2009, 35, 3117–3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, S.; Lee, W.E. Carbon containing castables: Current status and future prospects. Br. Ceram. Trans. 2002, 101, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Innocentini, M.D.M.; Pardo, A.R.F.; Pandolfelli, V.C.; Menegazzo, B.A.; Bittencourt, L.R.M.; Rettore, R.P. Permeability of high-alumina refractory castables based on various hydraulic binders. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2002, 85, 1517–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Souza, A.D.V.; Sousa, L.L.; Fernandes, L.; Cardoso, P.H.L.; Salomao, R. Al2O3-Al(OH)3-based castable porous structures. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 35, 1943–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ye, G.T.; Troczynski, T. Effect of magnesia on strength of hydratable alumina-bonded castable refractories. J. Mater. Sci. 2005, 40, 3921–3926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ye, G.; Troczynski, T. Hydration of hydratable alumina in the presence of various forms of MgO. Ceram. Int. 2006, 32, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ma, B.Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, G.Q.; Liang, D.D. Preparation and properties of Al2O3-MgAl2O4 ceramic foams. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 3237–3244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pilarska, A.A.; Klapiszewski, L.; Jesionowski, T. Recent development in the synthesis, modification and application of Mg(OH)2 and MgO: A review. Powder Technol. 2017, 319, 373–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, L.P.; Yan, Y.; Fan, X.Z.; Hu, Z.H.; Zhao, C.Y. Low-temperature synthesis of calcium-hexaluminate/magnesium-aluminum spinel composite ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 35, 2923–2931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bersh, A.V.; Belyakov, A.V.; Mazalov, D.Y.; Solov’ev, S.A.; Sudnik, L.V.; Fedotov, A.V. Formation and sintering of boehmite and aluminum oxide nanopowders. Refract. Ind. Ceram. 2017, 57, 655–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Han, D.; Zhang, J.; Liu, P.; Wang, S.W. Effect of polymorphism of Al2O3 on the sintering and microstructure of transparent MgAl2O4 ceramics. Opt. Mater. 2017, 71, 62–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gibson, L.J.; Ashby, M.F. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  35. Deng, X.G.; Wang, J.K.; Liu, J.H.; Zhang, H.J.; Han, L.; Zhang, S.W. Low cost foam-gelcasting preparation and characterization of porous magnesium aluminate spinel (MgAl2O4) ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 18215–18222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 10 01376 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the dried green bodies with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water: S1 (1:1); S2 (1:1.5); S3 (1:2) and S4 (1:2.5).
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the dried green bodies with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water: S1 (1:1); S2 (1:1.5); S3 (1:2) and S4 (1:2.5).
Materials 10 01376 g001
Materials 10 01376 g002 550
Figure 2. TG-DSC curves of the dried green bodies with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water: S1 (1:1) and S4 (1:2.5).
Figure 2. TG-DSC curves of the dried green bodies with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water: S1 (1:1) and S4 (1:2.5).
Materials 10 01376 g002
Materials 10 01376 g003 550
Figure 3. XRD patterns of the samples with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water sintered at 1600 °C for 4 h.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of the samples with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water sintered at 1600 °C for 4 h.
Materials 10 01376 g003
Materials 10 01376 g004 550
Figure 4. The apparent porosity and bulk density of the samples with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water sintered at 1600 °C for 4 h.
Figure 4. The apparent porosity and bulk density of the samples with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water sintered at 1600 °C for 4 h.
Materials 10 01376 g004
Materials 10 01376 g005 550
Figure 5. SEM images of fracture surface of the samples with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water sintered at 1600 °C for 4 h: (S1) 1:1; (S2) 1:1.5; (S3) 1:2; (S4) 1:2.5.
Figure 5. SEM images of fracture surface of the samples with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water sintered at 1600 °C for 4 h: (S1) 1:1; (S2) 1:1.5; (S3) 1:2; (S4) 1:2.5.
Materials 10 01376 g005
Materials 10 01376 g006 550
Figure 6. The pore size distribution of the samples with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water sintered at 1600 °C for 4 h.
Figure 6. The pore size distribution of the samples with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water sintered at 1600 °C for 4 h.
Materials 10 01376 g006
Materials 10 01376 g007a 550Materials 10 01376 g007b 550
Figure 7. (a) Compressive strength and ideal compressive strength of the samples with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water; and (b) linear fitting of the relative compressive strength and relative density.
Figure 7. (a) Compressive strength and ideal compressive strength of the samples with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water; and (b) linear fitting of the relative compressive strength and relative density.
Materials 10 01376 g007aMaterials 10 01376 g007b
Table
Table 1. Ratios of raw materials of the samples (wt %).
Table 1. Ratios of raw materials of the samples (wt %).
SamplesStarting PowdersDeionized Water
ρ-Al2O3MgO
S137.013.050.0
S229.610.460.0
S324.68.766.7
S421.27.471.4

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yuan, L.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Z.; He, X.; Ma, B.; Zhu, Q.; Yu, J. Fabrication and Characterization of Porous MgAl2O4 Ceramics via a Novel Aqueous Gel-Casting Process. Materials 2017, 10, 1376. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10121376

AMA Style

Yuan L, Liu Z, Liu Z, He X, Ma B, Zhu Q, Yu J. Fabrication and Characterization of Porous MgAl2O4 Ceramics via a Novel Aqueous Gel-Casting Process. Materials. 2017; 10(12):1376. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10121376

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yuan, Lei, Zongquan Liu, Zhenli Liu, Xiao He, Beiyue Ma, Qiang Zhu, and Jingkun Yu. 2017. "Fabrication and Characterization of Porous MgAl2O4 Ceramics via a Novel Aqueous Gel-Casting Process" Materials 10, no. 12: 1376. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10121376

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop