Next Article in Journal
Mesoscale Characterization of Fracture Properties of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Using a Lattice–Particle Model
Previous Article in Journal
Tunable Broadband Nonlinear Optical Properties of Black Phosphorus Quantum Dots for Femtosecond Laser Pulses
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Compressive Strength Enhancement of Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotube Forests by Constraint of Graphene Sheets

Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2017, 10(2), 206; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10020206
Submission received: 20 October 2016 / Revised: 13 February 2017 / Accepted: 16 February 2017 / Published: 21 February 2017

Abstract

:
We fabricated a 3D sandwich hybrid material composed of graphene and vertically aligned carbon nanotube forests (VACNTs) using chemical vapor deposition. The graphene was first synthesized on Cu foil. Then it was transferred to a substrate which had a pre-deposited catalyst Fe film and a buffer film of Al2O3 for the growth of VACNTs. The VACNTs were grown underneath the graphene and lifted up the graphene. The graphene, with its edges anchored on the Al2O3, provided a constrained boundary condition for the VACNTs and hence affected the growth height and mechanical strength of the VACNTs. We prepared three groups of samples: VACNTs without graphene, VACNTs with graphene transferred once (1-Gr/VACNTs), and VACNTs with graphene transferred twice (2-Gr/VACNTs). A nano-indentation system was used to measure the reduced compressive modulus (Er) and hardness (H). The Er and H of Gr/VACNTs increased with the number of transfers of the anchored graphene. The 2-Gr/VACNTs had the largest Er and H, 23.8 MPa and 912 KPa, which are 6.6 times and 5.2 times those of VACNTs without the anchored graphene, respectively. In this work, we have demonstrated a simple method to increase the mechanical properties and suppress the height of VACNTs with the anchored graphene and number of transfers.

1. Introduction

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene, both of which are carbon-based nanomaterials, have excellent mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties, so they are currently popular topics in scientific research and nanotechnology [1,2,3,4,5]. The most popular growth method of graphene and CNTs is chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [6,7,8,9]. Additionally, Hart et al. reported a method to control the sharp and the structure of carbon nanotube forests by a pre-fabricated mold [10]. However, the method is complex and expensive. In recent years, several theoretical and experimental reports have increased interest in 3D hybrid nanostructures combining graphene and CNT forests, including the fabrication methods of the structures [11,12,13,14,15]. These reports have shown that the 3D hybrid material has a wide range of potential applications, such as microsupercapacitor [12] and hydrogen storage [16]. The 3D hybrid material was fabricated by first growing the graphene on the substrate, after which the catalyst Fe film and buffer layer Al2O3 were deposited on top of the as-grown graphene to grow vertically aligned carbon nanotube carpets (VACNTs) using the CVD method [11,12]. Paul et al. reported a transfer method for fabricating the 3D hybrid structure in which the graphene was on the top of the hybrid structure [15]. However, most previous reports have noted that the electrical properties and hybrid structure of substrate/graphene/VACNTs limit their application. To date, no discussions of the mechanical properties of the 3D hybrid material have been published. This work focuses on the direct growth of the 3D structure of substrate/VACNTs/graphene. The mechanical properties of the 3D material with the graphene transferred once and twice are also discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

In this work, a 3D hybrid structure with the VACNTs sandwiched between the substrate and graphene was constructed. The graphene was synthesized with a three-temperature-zone CVD (TTZ-CVD) process. The as-grown grapheme was first transferred to the substrate, after which the VACNTs were synthesized by CVD method to form the hybrid structure of substrate/VACNTs/graphene. As-cleaned Cu foil (99.8% purity) was first placed on a quartz boat and inserted into a TTZ-CVD furnace, where it was heated to 1000 °C at 30 min under H2 of 30 sccm and argon (Ar) of 600 sccm. The Cu foil was annealed for 30 min at that temperature to remove oxides of Cu in H2 and Ar atmosphere. The mixed reaction gas of CH4, H2, and Ar was admitted into the CVD at flow rates of 10, 30, and 600 sccm for 5 min to grow the graphene sheet. Afterward, the CH4 flow was stopped and the sample was rapidly cooled to room temperature. Next, the as-grown graphene sheet was transferred onto the target substrate with a clean-lifting transfer technique utilizing electrostatic force [17]. The transfer procedure began with the as-grown graphene/Cu foil attached on the PET (poly ethylene terephthalate) by electrostatic force. After a pressing process to increase the attachment between the Cu foil and PET, the sample was immersed into Cu etchant (98% sodium persulfate) and heated to 60 °C to etch the Cu foil. The sample was then rinsed with IPA and DI water to remove residual etchant. The PET with the attached graphene was pressed, and the PET was then removed to transfer the graphene onto the target substrate, which had a pre-deposited 10 nm buffer layer of Al2O3 and a 1.9 nm catalyst Fe film. It was defined the deposited zone by the tape as shadow mask pattern and released it after the deposition of buffer layer and catalyst film. In addition, the attached graphene on PET was transferred onto one side of the pre-patterned Fe film for comparison of the mechanical properties with or without graphene, as shown in Figure 1. Subsequently, the target substrate was placed into the quartz tube and heated to 750 °C under a 600 sccm flow of Ar gas. To grow the VACNTs, a H2 flow of 400 sccm and C2H4 gas was supplied as the carbon source at a flow rate of 40 sccm for 60 min at 750 °C. The growth processes were conducted under 1 atm. The mechanical properties of the 3D hybrid structure of substrate/VACNTs/graphene were experimentally measured with a nanoindentation instrument.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows the Raman spectrum of the as-grown graphene. The two main peaks corresponded to the G band (~1580 cm−1) and 2D band (~2700 cm−1) of the graphene [18]. The peak intensity of the 2D band peak was lower than that of the G band, with a peak intensity ratio of I2D/IG ~0.67, and the full width at half-maximum of the 2D band peak was 63.1 cm−1. The results indicated few or more layers of graphene [19,20]. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) image is presented in Figure 3. The sample was 1 graphene sheet transferred onto the target substrate. The height of the 1-Gr/VACNTs was 509 um, lower than that of VACNTs of 1070 um without the anchored graphene. Interestingly, the morphology of VACNT was affected at the boundary zone (i.e., transition zone) due to the Van der Waals force of CNTs [21], which resulted in smooth increasing the height of VACNTs at the interface.
From the VACNTs growth process, Figure 4 shows the type of VACNTs is the multi-wall CNTs [22]. The mechanical properties of the VACNTs and 1-Gr/VACNTs (i.e., VACNTs with the graphene transferred once) were measured with a nanoindentation system (TI 950 TriboIndenter, Hysitron, Minneapolis, MN, USA). A standard Berkovich indenter was used to indent the top surfaces of the VACNTs and 1-Gr/VACNTs with a 30 µN load on the sample surface for 5 s. The slope of the unloading curve was used to determine the reduced modulus (Er) and hardness (H) of the samples according to the theory proposed by Oliver and Pharr [23]. The indentation depth of 1-Gr/VACNTs was less than that of the VACNTs sample, as shown in Figure 5, indicating that the hardness of the Gr-VACNTs was greater than that of the VACNTs. To verify the repeatable results of the nanoindentation measurement, two points were measured. The measurement results of Er and H are listed in Table 1, where it can be seen that the Er and H of 1-Gr/VACNTs were higher than those of the VACNTs. The Er and H of the 1-Gr/VACNTs were 3.633 MPa and 277 KPa, 2 times and 1.9 times those of the VACNTs, respectively. These differences indicated that the anchored graphene strengthened the mechanical properties of the VACNTs. The anchored graphene was similar to an elastic sheet constraining the growth of VACNTs, resulting in compression and a greater density of VACNTs, which enhanced the mechanical properties of the VACNTs. In addition, Wardle et al reported the densification of CNTs enhanced the mechanical properties with the increasing volume fraction of the different diameter CNTs [24].A similar effect may have occurred in this work, resulting in the greater Er and H of 1-Gr/VACNTs. The effect of pre-compression of the VACNTs suggests the graphene constraint enhanced to increase the Van der Waals force of CNTs.
To further examine the constraining effect of the multi-layer graphene on the mechanical properties, the graphene sheets were transferred once and twice onto different areas of the substrate and VACNTs were grown, as shown in the inset of Figure 6. Figure 6 is an SEM image of 2-Gr/VACNTs, 1-Gr/VACNTs, and VACNTs, which respectively had heights of 600 um, 740 um, and 1140 um. The height of the VACNTs with graphene transferred twice was lower than those with graphene transferred once and graphene not transferred. As can be seen from Figure 7, the Gr/VACNTs with graphene transferred twice had greater strength. The highest Er and H were respectively 6.6 times and 5.2 times those of VACNTs without the anchored graphene due to the compression and greater density of VACNTs, as shown in Figure 8. However, when the number of transfers of the anchored graphene was increased further, no VACNTs grew on the substrate. The anchored graphene layers were similar to a graphite film blocking the Fe catalysts and restrained the growth of the VACNTs. In addition, the height of the VACNTs was affected by the number of transfers of the anchored graphene.

4. Conclusions

In this work, a 3D hybrid nanostructure was fabricated with graphene and VACNTs. The mechanical properties of the Gr/VACNTs increased with the number of transfers of the anchored graphene. The height of the VACNTs was affected by the number of times the graphene was transferred. This simple method could be used to fabricate a high strength nano-material. In addition, VACNTs and graphene are the excellent performance of thermal interface materials. This may warrant new applications for the polishing [25] and micro-mold [26] which take advantage of high mechanical strength and greater heat dissipation.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, the Republic of China, for financial support under MOST103-2221-E-002-192-MY2.

Author Contributions

Chih-Chung Su conceived and designed the experiments; Ting-Xu Chen performed the experiments; Chih-Chung Su, Ting-Xu Chen, and Shuo-hung Chang analyzed the data; Chih-Chung Su wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Iijima, S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 1991, 354, 56–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lee, C.; Wei, X.; Kysar, J.W.; Hone, J. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 2008, 321, 385–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, Y.; Pan, C. Measurements of mechanical properties and number of layers of graphene from nano-indentation. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2012, 24, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Balandin, A.A.; Ghosh, S.; Bao, W.Z.; Calizo, I.; Teweldebrhan, D.; Miao, F.; Lau, C.N. Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 902–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, X.S.; Cai, W.W.; An, J.H.; Kim, S.; Nah, J.; Yang, D.X.; Piner, R.; Velamakanni, A.; Jung, I.; Tutuc, E.; et al. Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. Science 2009, 324, 1312–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Li, X.S.; Magnuson, C.W.; Venugopal, A.; An, J.H.; Suk, J.W.; Han, B.Y.; Borysiak, M.; Cai, W.W.; Velamakanni, A.; Zhu, Y.W.; et al. Graphene films with large domain size by a two-step chemical vapor deposition process. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 4328–4334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Satishkumar, B.C.; Govindaraj, A.; Rao, C.N.R. Bundles of aligned carbon nanotubes obtained by the pyrolysis of ferrocene–hydrocarbon mixtures: Role of the metal nanoparticles produced in situ. Curr. Appl. Phys. 1999, 307, 158–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, X.F.; Cao, A.Y.; Wei, B.Q.; Li, Y.H.; Wei, J.Q.; Xu, C.L.; Wu, D.H. Rapid growth of well-aligned carbon nanotube arrays. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2002, 362, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hart, A.J.; Slocum, A.H. Force output, control of film structure, and microscale shape transfer by carbon nanotube growth under mechanical pressure. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 1254–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zhu, Y.; Li, L.; Zhang, C.; Casillas, G.; Sun, Z.; Yan, Z.; Ruan, G.; Peng, Z.; Raji, A.R.; Kittrell, C.; et al. A seamless three-dimensional carbon nanotube graphene hybrid material. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lin, J.; Zhang, C.; Yan, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Peng, Z.; Hauge, R.H.; Natelson, D.; Tour, J.M. 3-Dimensional graphene carbon nanotube carpet-based microsupercapacitors with high electrochemical performance. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Xu, L.; Wei, N.; Zheng, Y.; Fan, Z.; Wang, H.Q.; Zheng, J.C. Graphene-nanotube 3D networks: Intriguing thermal and mechanical properties. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 1435–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yan, Z.M.; Zhu, L.; Yu, L.; Indranil, H.; Liu, M.G.; Yang, Z.; Xiang, S.; Lu, C.; Peng, W.; Sun, Z.; et al. Three-dimensional metal–graphene–nanotube multifunctional hybrid materials. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Paul, R.K.; Ghazinejad, M.; Penchev, M.; Lin, J.; Ozkan, M.; Ozkan, C.S. Synthesis of a pillared graphene nanostructure: A counterpart of three-dimensional carbon architectures. Small 2010, 6, 2309–2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dimitrakakis, G.K.; Tylianakis, E.; Froudakis, G.E. Pillared graphene: A new 3-D network nanostructure for enhanced hydrogen storage. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 3166–3170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wang, D.Y.; Huang, I.S.; Ho, P.H.; Li, S.S.; Yeh, Y.C.; Wang, D.W.; Chen, W.L.; Lee, Y.Y.; Chang, Y.M.; Chen, C.C.; et al. Clean-lifting transfer of large-area residual-free graphene films. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 4521–4526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ferrari, A.C.; Meyer, J.C.; Scardaci, V.; Casiraghi, C.; Lazzeri, M.; Mauri, F.; Piscanec, S.; Jiang, D.; Novoselov, K.S.; Roth, S.; et al. Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 187401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Peng, Z.W.; Yan, Z.; Sun, Z.Z.; Tour, J.M. Direct growth of bilayer graphene on SiO2 substrates by carbon diffusion through nickel. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 8241–8247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wu, W.; Yu, Q.K.; Peng, P.; Liu, Z.H.; Bao, J.M.; Pei, S.S. Control of thickness uniformity and grain size in graphene films for transparent conductive electrodes. Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 035603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Qu, L.; Dai, L. Direct growth of three-dimensional multicomponent micropatterns of vertically aligned single-walled carbon nanotubes interposed with their multi-walled counterparts on Al-activated iron substrates. J. Mater. Chem. 2007, 17, 3401–3405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wu, T.C.; Chang, S.H. Temperature enhanced growth of ultralong multi-walled carbon nanotubes forest. Curr. App. Phys. 2009, 9, 1117–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Oliver, W.C.; Pharr, M. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 1992, 7, 1564–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wardle, B.L.; Saito, D.S.; Garcı´a, E.J.; Hart, A.J.; Villoria, R.G.D.; Verploegen, E.A. Fabrication and characterization of ultrahigh-volume-fraction aligned carbon nanotube–polymer composites. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 2707–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wu, T.C.; Chang, N.K.; Su, C.C.; Huang, P.K.; Tsai, Y.Y.; Lin, H.Y.; Chang, S.H. Surface finishing using carbon nanotube forest. In Proceedings of the ASME DETC Conference, New York, NY, USA, 3–6 August 2008.
  26. Kim, Y.S.; Lee, K.; Lee, J.S.; Jung, G.Y.; Kim, W.B. Nanoimprint lithography patterns with a vertically aligned nanoscale tubular carbon structure. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 365305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Fabrication procedure of graphene/vertically aligned carbon nanotubes (VACNTs) hybrid structure. The catalyst Fe film is for growth of the VACNTs.
Figure 1. Fabrication procedure of graphene/vertically aligned carbon nanotubes (VACNTs) hybrid structure. The catalyst Fe film is for growth of the VACNTs.
Materials 10 00206 g001
Figure 2. Raman spectrum of as-grown graphene on Cu foil.
Figure 2. Raman spectrum of as-grown graphene on Cu foil.
Materials 10 00206 g002
Figure 3. SEM (scanning electron microscope) side-view image of the 1-Gr/VACNTs with an inset showing the optical image.
Figure 3. SEM (scanning electron microscope) side-view image of the 1-Gr/VACNTs with an inset showing the optical image.
Materials 10 00206 g003
Figure 4. TEM (transmission electron microscope) image of multi-wall CNT.
Figure 4. TEM (transmission electron microscope) image of multi-wall CNT.
Materials 10 00206 g004
Figure 5. The load-depth curves of VACNTs with and without the anchored grapheme.
Figure 5. The load-depth curves of VACNTs with and without the anchored grapheme.
Materials 10 00206 g005
Figure 6. SEM images of the side view of the Gr/VACNTs, with an inset showing a sample with different layers of anchored grapheme.
Figure 6. SEM images of the side view of the Gr/VACNTs, with an inset showing a sample with different layers of anchored grapheme.
Materials 10 00206 g006
Figure 7. The load-depth curves of 1-Gr/VACNTs, 2-Gr/VACNTs and VACNTs.
Figure 7. The load-depth curves of 1-Gr/VACNTs, 2-Gr/VACNTs and VACNTs.
Materials 10 00206 g007
Figure 8. The Er and H with the graphene transferred different numbers of times.
Figure 8. The Er and H with the graphene transferred different numbers of times.
Materials 10 00206 g008
Table 1. Reduced modulus (Er) and hardness (H) of VACNTs (vertically aligned carbon nanotube) and 1-Gr/VACNTs.
Table 1. Reduced modulus (Er) and hardness (H) of VACNTs (vertically aligned carbon nanotube) and 1-Gr/VACNTs.
MaterialReduced Modulus Er (Mpa)Surface Hardness H (Kpa)
VACNTs1.766149
1-Gr/VACNTs3.633277

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Su, C.-C.; Chen, T.-X.; Chang, S.-H. Compressive Strength Enhancement of Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotube Forests by Constraint of Graphene Sheets. Materials 2017, 10, 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10020206

AMA Style

Su C-C, Chen T-X, Chang S-H. Compressive Strength Enhancement of Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotube Forests by Constraint of Graphene Sheets. Materials. 2017; 10(2):206. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10020206

Chicago/Turabian Style

Su, Chih-Chung, Ting-Xu Chen, and Shuo-Hung Chang. 2017. "Compressive Strength Enhancement of Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotube Forests by Constraint of Graphene Sheets" Materials 10, no. 2: 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10020206

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop