Next Article in Journal
Modelling Behaviour of a Carbon Epoxy Composite Exposed to Fire: Part I—Characterisation of Thermophysical Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction Model for the Carbonation of Post-Repair Materials in Carbonated RC Structures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Mechanical Behavior of HAVAR Foils Using the Small Punch Technique

1
Nuclear Research Center-Negev, P.O. Box 9001, Beer-Sheva 84190, Israel
2
Department of Materials Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel
3
Soreq Nuclear Research Center, Yavne 70600, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2017, 10(5), 491; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10050491
Submission received: 26 January 2017 / Revised: 19 April 2017 / Accepted: 26 April 2017 / Published: 3 May 2017

Abstract

:
Prediction of the mechanical behavior of thin foils (~25 µm) requires special characterization techniques. The current work is focused on the mechanical and microstructural characterization of 25 µm HAVAR alloy foils following annealing, cold rolling, and subsequent heat treatments, using small punch testing (SPT), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and transmission-scanning electron microscopy (TEM). The SPT technique revealed that the annealed specimens exhibited the largest maximal load to failure and deformation (more than two-fold), compared to the cold rolled and heat treated conditions. The microscopy observations revealed high dislocation density following cold rolling and subsequent heat treatments. Following annealing, a cubic crystallographic structure (FCC) with equiaxed grains and a limited dislocation population was observed. Following cold rolling and subsequent thermal treatment, a preferred orientation texture (i.e., ‘deformation texture’) was observed with a very high dislocation density. The correlation between the mechanical behavior and the microstructural observations is discussed in detail.

1. Introduction

The Small Punch Test (SPT), Ball Punch Test (BPT), Disk Bend Test (DBT) [1], and Shear Punch Test [2,3,4,5,6,7] are common mechanical techniques for the characterization of small dimension or thin specimens. These testing methods are usually conducted on specimens that are too small to undergo standard tension tests. The SPT concept is based on locking a thin sheet-like specimen between two dies and pushing a punch against it with a spherical cap, up until failure. During the test, the load and the punch stroke are monitored simultaneously until the end-test criterion (e.g., maximal or failure load) is achieved. Many of the common standards, including the E-643 ASTM standard [8], are valid for specimens whose thickness ranges from 200 to 2000 μm, resulting in many research publications focusing on mechanical characterization of alloys thicker than 200 μm [9,10,11,12,13].
A schematic of apparatus for SPT and a typical load displacement curve are shown in Figure 1. The load displacement curve shown in Figure 1b is composed of four distinct regions, typical to highly ductile materials, as described in [10,11,12]: I—Elastic behavior, II—Plastic behavior (strain hardening), III—Plastic membrane stretching, and IV—plastic instability. In the vicinity of the maximal load, cracks are expected to develop in the specimen, followed by ductile propagation and fracture. The zone between regions I and II is used to estimate the material yield stress while the ultimate stress and fracture strain are estimated from zone IV. Many of the reported studies have focused on specimens having thickness values of 500 μm. Haroush et al. [14] have shown that for specimens having a thickness greater than 300 μm, classical plate equations can be used to estimate the yield stress, while for thinner specimens yield stress estimation from SPT is a very complex issue, since it is a function of the specimen thickness.
Thin foils having thickness values of 100 µm and below are used in a variety of applications such as for food service, shielding, vacuum chambers (Al), for electronics, batteries, circuit board, cable wraps (Cu), for aerospace, surgical instruments, tool wraps, heat exchangers (stainless steel), and more. In medical applications, a 25 µm thin foil is required as a window for fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) production [15,16].
HAVAR is a high strength, non-magnetic, and corrosion resistant cobalt base alloy, suitable for operations at temperatures of up to 500 °C [17]. The alloy–composed of Co (42%), Cr (19.5%), Fe (19.1%), Ni (12.7%), Mo (2.2%), W (2.7%), and C (0.2%) atoms–is known to exhibit a cubic crystallographic structure (FCC) with a lattice parameter of 3.582 Å. One of its main applications is in the production of the short lived, positron emitting 18F isotope, typically produced by the reaction 18O(p, n) 18F. With the increasing demand for 18F by hospitals, an accelerated production rate is required. Thin (25 μm) foil of HAVAR is used in cyclotron accelerators as a window for liquid and gas targets. Irradiation of targets by proton or deuteron beams is carried out at various amounts of energy and occasionally at high currents and for long time durations, up to a few hours. During such irradiation conditions, the HAVAR foil might be damaged; its microstructure and mechanical properties can be degraded and, therefore, the window life-time can be significantly reduced.
The changes in HAVAR mechanical properties due to proton irradiation requires the characterization of its properties before and after the irradiation process in order to analyze the alloy’s ability to withstand the process. In particular, vendor instructions are to replace the foils every 1 mA-h, which can be translated to about a month of irradiation in the cyclotron.
The goals of the current stage of the research were to study the HAVAR foil microstructural and mechanical behavior in three metallurgical conditions; annealed (Ann.), cold rolled for 85–90% area reduction (CR), and cold rolled following subsequent heat treated at 500 °C for 3.5 h (CR & HT). The specimens were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), microscopy observations, and SPT. The damage to the HAVAR foil as a function of proton energy and as a function of the integrated current will be studied at a later stage. We note that since the HAVAR foil during irradiation is exposed to a Gaussian shaped intensity beam, the damage and the temperature profile is non-uniform throughout the HAVAR window. Therefore, at locations where the temperature is higher, the increased thermal atom diffusion (annealing) may reduce the damage.

2. Experimental Procedure

25 µm-thick HAVAR foils (purchased from Hamilton Precision Metals, Lancaster, PA, USA) in the annealed form, cold rolled for 85–90% area reduction and subsequently thermally treated at 500 °C for 3.5 h were cut by scissors to an area of 8 × 8 mm, polished to 1µm surface finish, and cleaned by alcohol. Small punch testing was conducted using the apparatus shown in Figure 2 by the following steps: (1) clamping of the specimen in between the dies under 300 N; (2) pre-loading up to 5 N and balancing the stoke transducer (Instron COD—Crack Opening Displacement); (3) pushing the punch into the specimen under stroke control at a speed of 0.2 mm/min up to failure, as was indicated by the load drop. The punch used for the experiments was ball-shaped with a diameter of 2.4 mm, while the bottom die diameter was 3.0 mm. The ball adhered to the punch due to a thin layer of grease that was smeared on it, in order to center it in relation to the die and the test specimen. After failure, fractured surface was characterized by a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM, JEOL JSM 5600, JEOL, Welwyn Garden, UK). Following each of the examined metallurgical conditions, the crystallographic structure was identified by XRD using a 1.5406 Å wavelength and a Cu tube.
The microstructure was investigated by using a JEOL 200 KV TEM (JEOL). For this purpose, the specimens were prepared by: cutting of 3 mm disks and selective etching using Struers Tenopol 5 with 10% Perchloric Acid + 90% Methanol.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Small Punch Test

The SPT load and displacement curves and the fracture modes following the Ann., CR, and CR-HT conditions are shown in Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively. It can be seen that for the Ann. condition (Figure 3a), three regions were apparent: I—elastic, II—strain hardening, and III—membrane stretching, were apparent, the fourth region described in relation to Figure 1b was absent, which indicates plastic instability. After stretching, the load dropped sharply, indicating a failure. The maximal load (Pmax, Figure 1b), was originally considered as the end-test criterion for all of the specimens. However, due to the different observed mechanical failure regimes following each of the metallurgical conditions tested, the displacement at maximum load (δmax, Figure 1a) was chosen as the characteristic parameter for comparison. The SPT results for all of the specimens are summarized in Table 1.
The fracture mode of the Ann. specimens is shown in Figure 3b. It can be seen than the fractured zone is surrounded by an ‘orange peel’ texture, indicating ductile behavior. This behavior is supported by the very high displacement and load values in the SPT curve and the final specimen’s shape shown in the figure.
From the SPT behavior of the CR condition (Figure 4a), a totally different behavior compared to the Ann. condition (Figure 3a) can be seen. Following CR, similarly to the Ann. condition, the same three mechanical regimes are observed, the maximal load displacement is smaller by about a factor of 4: 0.19 mm compared to 0.87 mm. Furthermore, the maximal load is smaller by about a factor of 2 (65 N), compared to 154 N. The end of test behavior is similar to in the Ann. condition—sharp load drop and failure. The fracture mode is shown in Figure 4b. It can be seen that the fractured zone is devoid of any ‘orange peel’ texture; it is focused on the specimen center and contains a crack propagated from the center to the edges while crossing the rolling direction. The fracture contour exhibits a very sharp edge without any evidence of plasticity. This conjecture is supported by the specimen shape at the end of the test, as can be seen in the figure. The displacement at maximum load and the maximum load values are summarized in Table 1.
From the SPT behavior of the CR-HT condition, shown in Figure 5a, a similar behavior to the CR condition (Figure 4a) and totally different behavior from the Ann. condition (Figure 3a) can be seen. In this case, the maximal load displacement and the maximum load values are very similar to for the CR specimen and smaller than for the Ann. The fracture zone, shown in Figure 5b, is located at the center of the sample and contains a crack propagated from the center to the edges without any evidence of plasticity, in a similar way as with the CR condition described above. It can be noticed that the crack propagates in a random orientation, originally with an angle to the rolling foil direction that changed almost perpendicular towards the direction of the rolling (Figure 5b).
The tensile mechanical properties of the Ann., CR, and CR-HT conditions, reported by the manufacturer, are summarized in Table 2 [17]. It can be seen that the alloy in the Ann. condition is very ductile (e~40%), with yield and ultimate stresses of about 500 (S0.2%) and 1000 (SUTS) MPa respectively. For the CR condition, the yield and ultimate stresses almost doubled, but the elongation to fracture is very limited. For the CR & HT condition, the reported yield and ultimate stresses are 25% higher than the CR and more than doubled compared to the Ann. conditions, while the elongation to fracture is also very limited.
According to the previously reported tensile mechanical properties (Table 2) and the currently examined SPT behavior (Table 1), it can be seen that the tensile elongation to fracture and the SPT maximal load displacement (δmax), can be correlated. The Ann. specimen exhibits the largest tensile elongation to fracture (e) and the highest maximal load displacement. On the other hand, the CR and CR-HT specimens had very limited elongation to fracture and the displacement in the SPT was smaller by about a factor of 4 compared to the Ann. The displacement of the CR and CR-HT can be considered the same.

3.2. Crystallographic Structure

The XRD results following all of the tested conditions are shown in Figure 6. It can be seen that the Ann. condition exhibits sharp and narrow peaks, indicating specimens free of internal stresses, while the CR-HT specimens exhibit much broader peaks, some with low intensity and some are missing (2θ = 51°, 91.5°), indicating high internal stresses and preferred orientation. The crystallographic structure of HAVAR for all of the investigated metallurgical conditions was found to be FCC with a lattice parameter of 3.58 Å. Figure 6b highlights the differences between the Ann. and CR peaks at 2θ = 43° and 51°.

3.3. TEM Observation

The TEM studies have shown that the microstructure of the annealed foil contains equiaxed grains about 4 µm in diameter, a low population of dislocations in the bulk and a small quantity of scattered carbides (Figure 7a). Electron diffraction confirmed the XRD results and showed that the matrix is cubic structured (FCC) with a lattice parameter of 3.58 Å. The TEM studies revealed that all of the observed carbides across the thickness are enriched (53–69 wt %) by Cr in comparison to 20 wt % Cr in the matrix as shown in Figure 8. Furthermore, the observed carbides were found to contain most of the HAVAR alloying elements. The element concentrations in the matrix and carbide phases are summarized in Table 3. Electron diffraction and energy filtered mapping (EFTEM) of the carbide phase (Figure 8) revealed a cubic crystallographic structure (FCC) with a lattice parameter of 10.65 Å with much higher carbon content compared to the matrix. The best fitted carbide was found to be a M23C6 type, such as (Cr,Co,Mo,Ni,W)23C6 or Fe21W2C12 with a lattice parameter of 10.622 Å. These observations are in contrast to Benson’s report [18], which concluded that heat treatment of HAVAR following cold working results in hexagonal WC precipitates (epsilon phase).
Following CR, a preferred orientation (‘deformation texture’) (Figure 6b) was observed, in agreement with the XRD analysis, with a very high dislocation density compared to the Ann. condition (Figure 7b). Electron diffraction revealed that the crystallographic structures of the matrix and carbide phases are similar to those of the Ann. condition.
Bright field TEM image following the CR-HT condition is shown in Figure 7c. The presence of carbides in addition to the high dislocation density can be easily seen. According to Hamilton’s data sheet [17], the tensile properties of the CR-HT are higher than the CR by about 25%.

4. Conclusions

The mechanical properties of 25 µm thick HAVAR foils following annealing, cold rolling, and subsequent 500 °C for 3.5 h thermal treatment were characterized by the SPT and correlated to the microstructural characteristics. According to the overall observations, we conclude that HAVAR can be strengthened in two stages: cold work and heat treatment following cold working. Cold working is the primary strengthening mechanism while the heat treatment is the secondary mechanism. Cold working created a variety of defects account for the strengthening mechanisms, namely: very high dislocation density, stacking faults, twins, sub-twins, and the coexistence of two crystallographic phases (Matrix, (γ) FCC and (ε) HCP phase), evolved during the cold rolling into a mosaic-like texture. Heat treatment following cold working promoted the precipitation of fine cubic M23C6 carbides in the range of a few nm in diameter as a secondary strengthening mechanism. These carbides precipitate during the heat treatment and contribute to the alloy strengthening. In all of the investigated conditions, a HAVAR matrix was observed; exhibiting an FCC crystallographic structure with a lattice parameter of 3.58 Å, with embedded FCC-M23C6 type carbides and a lattice parameter of 10.65 Å, containing almost all of the matrix elements.
The changes in microstructure due to cold rolling and heat treatment can explain the huge changes in the mechanical properties. The annealed state has an equi-axed grain size of about 2–5 µm diameter, containing a few dislocations and a few twins. This microstructure exhibited the highest load capacity and ductility among all of the investigated metallurgical conditions. On the other hand, cold rolling with and without subsequent thermal treatment has a very high density of defects, limiting the dislocation mean path, while increasing the yield stress and reducing the ductility toward a brittle failure morphology.

Author Contributions

S.H. and D.M. conceived and designed the experiments; A.T. performed the experiments; I.S., R.S. and Y.G. were supervisors

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lucas, G. The development of small specimen mechanical test techniques. J. Nucl. Mater. 1983, 117, 327–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Guduru, R.K.; Darling, K.A.; Kishore, R.; Scattergood, R.O.; Koch, C.C.; Murty, K.L. Evaluation of mechanical properties using shear–punch testing. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005, 395, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guduru, R.K.; Wong, P.Z.; Darling, K.A.; Koch, C.C.; Murty, K.L.; Scattergood, R.O. Determination of activation volume in nanocrystalline Cu using the shear punch test. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2007, 9, 855–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hamilton, M.; Toloczko, M. Effect of low temperature irradiation on the mechanical properties of ternary V–Cr–Ti alloys as determined by tensile tests and shear punch tests. J. Nucl. Mater. 2000, 283, 488–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Toloczko, M.B.; Kurtz, R.J.; Hasegawa, A.; Abe, K. Shear punch tests performed using a new low compliance test fixture. J. Nucl. Mater. 2002, 307, 1619–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hankin, G.L.; Toloczko, M.B.; Hamilton, M.L.; Garner, F.A.; Faulkner, R.G. Shear punch testing of 59 Ni isotopically-doped model austenitic alloys after irradiation in FFTF at different He/dpa ratios. J. Nucl. Mater. 1998, 258, 1657–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Goyal, S.; Karthik, V.; Kasiviswanathan, K.V.; Valsan, M.; Rao, K.B.; Raj, B. Finite element analysis of shear punch testing and experimental validation. Mater. Des. 2010, 31, 2546–2552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. American Society for Testing and Materials. Ball Punch Deformation of Metallic Sheet Material; ASTM-E643; American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 1987; pp. 885–888. [Google Scholar]
  9. García, T.E.; Rodríguez, C.; Belzunce, F.J.; Suárez, C. Estimation of the mechanical properties of metallic materials by means of the small punch test. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 582, 708–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Baik, J.-M.; Kameda, J.; Buck, O. Development of small punch tests for ductile-brittle transition temperature measurement of temper embrittled Ni-Cr steels. In The Use of Small-Scale Specimens for Testing Irradiated Material; Corwin, W.R., Lucas, G.E., Eds.; ASTM-STP 888; American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 1983; pp. 92–111. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mao, X.; Takahashi, H. Development of a further-miniaturized specimen of 3 mm diameter for tem disk (ø 3 mm) small punch tests. J. Nucl. Mater. 1987, 150, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Klein, M.; Hadrboletz, A.; Weiss, B.; Khatibi, G. The ‘size effect’ on the stress–strain, fatigue and fracture properties of thin metallic foils. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2001, 319, 924–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Matoca, K.; Hurst, R. The European Code of Practice for Small Punch testing—Where do we go from here. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Determination of Mechanical Properties of Materials by Small Punch and other Miniature Testing Techniques, Ostrava, Czech Republic, 30 August–2 September 2010. [Google Scholar]
  14. Haroush, S.; Priel, E.; Moreno, D.; Busiba, A.; Silverman, I.; Turgeman, A.; Shneck, R.; Gelbstein, Y. Evaluation of the mechanical properties of SS-316L thin foils by small punch testing and finite element analysis. Mater. Des. 2015, 83, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gagnon, K.; Wilson, J.S.; Sant, E.; Backhouse, C.J.; McQuarrie, S.A. Assessing the performance and longevity of Nb, Pt, Ta, Ti, Zr, and ZrO2-sputtered Havar foils for the high-power production of reactive [18F]F by proton irradiation of [18O] H2O. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2011, 69, 1330–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Shaiju, V.S.; Sharma, S.D.; Kumar, R.; Sarin, B. Target foil rupture scenario and provision for handling different models of medical cyclotrons used in India. J. Med. Phys 2009, 34, 161. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Metals, H.P. HAVAR—Technical Data Sheet; Hamilton Precision Metals: Lancaster, PA, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  18. Benson, R.B.J. The resistance of selected high strength alloys to embrittlement by a hydrogen environment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Effects of Hydrogen on Materials Properties and Selection and Structural Design, Champion, PA, USA, 23–27 September 1973. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of apparatus for small punch test of specimen of dimensions 8 × 8 mm, t0 = 25 µm. Adapted from [14], with permission from © 2015 Elsevier; (b) Schematic load vs. deflection curve for specimens thicker than 300 µm.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of apparatus for small punch test of specimen of dimensions 8 × 8 mm, t0 = 25 µm. Adapted from [14], with permission from © 2015 Elsevier; (b) Schematic load vs. deflection curve for specimens thicker than 300 µm.
Materials 10 00491 g001
Figure 2. SPT apparatus used in this study.
Figure 2. SPT apparatus used in this study.
Materials 10 00491 g002
Figure 3. (a) Load versus displacement curve of 25 µm annealed HAVAR foils; (b) SEM fractography.
Figure 3. (a) Load versus displacement curve of 25 µm annealed HAVAR foils; (b) SEM fractography.
Materials 10 00491 g003
Figure 4. (a) Load versus displacement curve of 25 µm CR HAVAR foils; (b) SEM fractography.
Figure 4. (a) Load versus displacement curve of 25 µm CR HAVAR foils; (b) SEM fractography.
Materials 10 00491 g004
Figure 5. (a) Load versus displacement curve of 25 µm CR-HT HAVAR foils; (b) SEM fractography.
Figure 5. (a) Load versus displacement curve of 25 µm CR-HT HAVAR foils; (b) SEM fractography.
Materials 10 00491 g005
Figure 6. XRD diffractogram of HAVAR (a) following the three investigated metallurgical conditions; (b) following Ann. and CR at 2θ = 43.7° and 51°.
Figure 6. XRD diffractogram of HAVAR (a) following the three investigated metallurgical conditions; (b) following Ann. and CR at 2θ = 43.7° and 51°.
Materials 10 00491 g006
Figure 7. TEM observations of HAVAR in three metallurgical condition: (a) Annealed, microstructure of three grains, FCC, 3.58 Å; (b) CR, M23C6 carbide, FCC, 10.65 Å; (c) CR-HT.
Figure 7. TEM observations of HAVAR in three metallurgical condition: (a) Annealed, microstructure of three grains, FCC, 3.58 Å; (b) CR, M23C6 carbide, FCC, 10.65 Å; (c) CR-HT.
Materials 10 00491 g007
Figure 8. EFTEM image of CR-HT at 800 °C for 1 h, carbon element: (a) bright field image of the matrix and carbide phases; (b) carbon profile over the carbide.
Figure 8. EFTEM image of CR-HT at 800 °C for 1 h, carbon element: (a) bright field image of the matrix and carbide phases; (b) carbon profile over the carbide.
Materials 10 00491 g008
Table 1. Maximal load displacement and maximum load of 25 µm Ann., CR, and CR-HT HAVAR foils.
Table 1. Maximal load displacement and maximum load of 25 µm Ann., CR, and CR-HT HAVAR foils.
Maximal Load Displacement (mm)Load (Max.) (N)Alloy
0.87 ± 0.01154.19 ± 0.8Ann.
0.19 ± 0.0164.83 ± 3.4CR
0.22 ± 0.00769.62 ± 3.3CR-HT
Table 2. Typical tensile mechanical properties of HAVAR, as were reported by the manufacturer [17].
Table 2. Typical tensile mechanical properties of HAVAR, as were reported by the manufacturer [17].
Typical Tensile Mechanical Properties of HAVAR
Ann.CRCR-HT
SUTS (Mpa)96018602275
S0.2% (Mpa)48017252070
Elongation to Fracture (%)401%1%
Hardness (HRc)255060
Modulus of Elasticity (Gpa)200200200
Table 3. Element concentrations in the matrix and carbide phases.
Table 3. Element concentrations in the matrix and carbide phases.
Element (wt %)CoCoCrNiFeWMoMnC
Matrix41.6841.6819.4912.519.52.782.191.560.20
Particle (carbide)12–1412–1453–693–47–105–67–101.5–2.5Higher than 0.2

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Haroush, S.; Moreno, D.; Silverman, I.; Turgeman, A.; Shneck, R.; Gelbstein, Y. The Mechanical Behavior of HAVAR Foils Using the Small Punch Technique. Materials 2017, 10, 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10050491

AMA Style

Haroush S, Moreno D, Silverman I, Turgeman A, Shneck R, Gelbstein Y. The Mechanical Behavior of HAVAR Foils Using the Small Punch Technique. Materials. 2017; 10(5):491. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10050491

Chicago/Turabian Style

Haroush, Shlomo, Daniel Moreno, Ido Silverman, Asher Turgeman, Roni Shneck, and Yaniv Gelbstein. 2017. "The Mechanical Behavior of HAVAR Foils Using the Small Punch Technique" Materials 10, no. 5: 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10050491

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop