Next Article in Journal
Optical Characterization of Nano- and Microcrystals of EuPO4 Created by One-Step Synthesis of Antimony-Germanate-Silicate Glass Modified by P2O5
Previous Article in Journal
Towards Understanding the Polymerization Process in Bitumen Bio-Fluxes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fatigue Properties of the Ultra-High Strength Steel TM210A

1
State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures, School of Aerospace, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
2
Institute of Aviation Equipment, Qing’an Group Corporation Limited, Xi’an 710077, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2017, 10(9), 1057; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10091057
Submission received: 26 July 2017 / Revised: 4 September 2017 / Accepted: 6 September 2017 / Published: 9 September 2017

Abstract

:
This paper presents the results of an experiment to investigate the high cycle fatigue properties of the ultra-high strength steel TM210A. A constant amplitude rotating bending fatigue experiment was performed at room temperature at stress ratio R = −1. In order to evaluate the notch effect, the fatigue experiment was carried out upon two sets of specimens, smooth and notched, respectively. In the experiment, the rotating bending fatigue life was tested using the group method, and the rotating bending fatigue limit was tested using the staircase method at 1 × 107 cycles. A double weighted least square method was then used to fit the stress-life (S–N) curve. The S–N curves of the two sets of specimens were obtained and the morphologies of the fractures of the two sets of specimens were observed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results showed that the fatigue limit of the smooth specimen for rotating bending fatigue was 615 MPa; the ratio of the fatigue limit to tensile strength was 0.29, and the cracks initiated at the surface of the smooth specimen; while the fatigue limit of the notched specimen for rotating bending fatigue was 363 MPa, and the cracks initiated at the edge of the notch. The fatigue notch sensitivity index of the ultra-high strength maraging steel TM210A was 0.69.

1. Introduction

In order to meet the needs of high weight loads, high-transmission ratio, long life, weight and volume limits of important bearing units such as the leading edge flaps of a certain aircraft, material must have performance qualities such as high strength (σb ≥ 2058 MPa, σ0.2 ≥ 1960 MPa), high plasticity (δ5 ≥ 7.5%, ψ ≥ 45%), high toughness (αk ≥ 39.2 J/cm2, KIC ≥ 62 MPa·m1/2), high hardness (HRC ≥ 51) and high fatigue strength (σ−1 ≥ 680 MPa (3 × 106)). In the past many materials have been unable to meet these requirements. Recently, a new ultra-high strength maraging steel TM210A has been developed based on the design of the 18Ni maraging steel. The maraging steels are based on the iron-nickel-cobalt-molybdenum system that has emerged as an outstanding family of materials with exceptional combinations of characteristics. They are applied particulary in automotive, aerospace, nuclear, gear, bearing and other industries [1]. These grades generally contain 18 wt % nickel and are commonly designated as 18Nixxxx, where xxxx is the nominal strength value attained by final heat treatment. Their outstanding attributes include ultra-high strength coupled with high fracture toughness, and excellent formability under hot and cold working conditions. The material is commercially available in different strength ranges from 1400 MPa to 2400 MPa [2]. The materials are low-carbon, and the chemical composition is: C ≤ 0.03%, S ≤ 0.01%, P ≤ 0.01%, Ni18.5%, Co7.5%–9.5%, Mo3.25%–4.8%, Ti ≥ 0.2%, Al≥0.1%, and others B, Zr, Ca [3,4].
At present, the material TM210A has been widely used in multi-type aircraft drive devices, such as gears, shafts, splines and other important bearing structures. These structural parts are unavoidably subjected to alternating loads during aircraft service. Fatigue damage is the main cause of failure of the important structural parts in the aircraft. Statistics show that most of the service failures of aircraft components occur in the form of fatigue damage, which amounts to about 60% of total failures [5].Serious air craft flight accidents involving fatigue-related causes are still occurring at about 100 times per year globally [6].
In this paper, rotating bending fatigue tests were carried out using the ultra-high strength maraging steel TM210Ain order to investigate the fatigue strength of the smooth specimen and the notched specimen, and to observe the fracture morphology. Finally, the fatigue notch sensitivity index was calculated.

2. Experiment

2.1. Material and Specimen

The experimental material was ultra-high strength steel TM210A. The chemical composition of TM210A is shown in Table 1. The material was solution-treated for 1h at 820 °C in a vacuum, followed by air-cooling and age-hardening for 4h at 510 ± 5 °C in a salt bath. This method enabled the determination of the plane-strain fracture toughness (K1C) by increasing force of fatigue-precracked test specimens. Details of the test specimens and experimental procedures make reference to ISO 12737:2010(E).The mechanical properties of the TM210A are shown in Table 2. The microstructure of TM210A is the martensite shown in Figure 1. The shape and dimensions of the smooth specimen ( K t = 1 ) and notched specimen ( K t = 2 ) used in the fatigue experiment are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively.

2.2. Fatigue Experimental Method

The constant amplitude rotating bending fatigue experimentswere performed in the PQ1-6 bending fatigue experimental machine. The working speed was constant at 5000 r/min. The experimental environment was atmospheric temperature (25 ± 2 °C), humidity (25%–40%RH), and the stress ratio was R = −1. The stress life (S–N) curve of the low/medium cycle fatigue regime was determined using the group method, and the fatigue limit at 1 × 107cycles was determined using the staircase method. The fatigue tests were conducted at various stress levels in order to determine the mean S–N curve with a probability of failure of 50%. The group method of the fatigue properties of metallic engineering materials was determined by testing a set of specimens at various stress levels to generate a fatigue life relationship as a function of stress. The results are expressed as an S–N curve that fits the experimental data, plotted in appropriate coordinates. The fatigue tests were conducted to generate strength data for a set of specimens in a sequential way using the staircase method. This starts the test at a first stress level that is preferably close to the estimated mean strength. It selects a stress step, preferably close to the standard deviation, by which to vary the stress level during the test. If no information is available about the standard deviation, a step of about 5% of the estimated mean fatigue strength may be used as the stress step. A first specimen, randomly chosen, is tested at the first stress level to see if it fails before the given number of cycles. For the next specimen, also randomly chosen, the stress level is increased by a step if the preceding specimen did not fail, and decreased by the same amount if it failed. Testing continues until all the specimens have been tested in this way. The fracture morphology of fatigue specimens was observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Fatigue Experimental Results

The experiment was carried out from the high stress level to low stress level. The number of cycles to failure, abnormal phenomena, and specimen damage was recorded during the process. The experimental data for smooth and notched specimens of the TM210A are shown in Table 3 and Table 4, respectively. From Table 3 to Table 4, the stress amplitudes of the smooth specimen fatigue test are shown at eight stress levels from 768MPa to 568MPa; and the stress amplitudes of the notched specimen fatigue test at eight stress levels from 473 MPa to 333 MPa. The average fatigue life at each stress level can be calculated, as shown in Table 5 and Table 6.

3.2. S–N Curves

The S–N curve is a basic curve for characterizing the fatigue properties of the material. According to the experimental data from Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6, the S–N curves of the smooth specimen and the notched specimen can be fitted. The S–N curve has a variety of forms of expression. The three-parameter S–N curve model can be used to describe the stress-life relationship of the long-life region. This study selected the classical three-parameter power function S–N curve model [7].
N ( S max S 0 ) H = C
Where S max is the maximum stress, N is the fatigue life, S 0 is the theoretical fatigue limit, H and C are the material constant. A double weighted least square method is used for fitting.
From the data in Table 3 and Table 5, the parameters of the smooth specimen were obtained, S 0 = 613.1649 MPa, H = 0.9665, C = 1.9333 × 107, and the S–N curve equation of the smooth specimen was obtained
N ( S max 613.1649 ) 0.9665 = 1.9333 × 10 7
According to the fitting equation, we can draw the S–N curve of the smooth specimens of the ultra-high strength maraging steel TM210A with a 50% survival rate, as shown in Figure 4. It can be seen that the fatigue limit of the smooth specimen was not more than 615 MPa.
From the data in Table 4 and Table 6, the parameters of the notched specimen were obtained, S 0 = 350.8066MPa, H = 2.0649, C = 1.7488 × 107, and the S–N curve equation of the notched specimen was obtained
N ( S max 350.8066 ) 2.0649 = 1.7488 × 10 7
According to the fitting equation, we can draw the S–N curve of the notched specimens of the ultra-high strength maraging steel TM210A with a 50% survival rate, as shown in Figure 5. It can be seen that the fatigue limit of the notched specimen was not more than 365 MPa.
From Figure 4 to Figure 5, it can be seen that the S–N curves of the smooth specimens and the notched specimens of the ultra-high strength maraging steel TM210A decreased with the decrease of the stress level, and the fatigue life was prolonged. The fatigue stress-life data contained two parts. Part 1: the data of the test was from initiation to before the fatigue limit, which corresponded to the fracture of the specimen due to the crack initiation-expansion (cross symbols). Part 2: the data of the test was at lower stress levels, in which the specimen did not break (circular symbols).
For a more intuitive process, Figure 6 and Figure 7 show the fatigue lift graphs for smooth and notched specimens at 1 × 10 7 cycles, respectively. Only five stress levels were considered in the analysis of the smooth specimen, as shown in Figure 6, where the beginning stress was 628MPa, the step stress was 20MPa, and the number of the effective specimen was 14. Only four stress levels were considered in the analysis of the notched specimen, as shown in Figure 7, where the stress began at 373 MPa, the step stress was 20 MPa, and the number of the effective specimen was 13.
According to the statistical theory
σ 1 = 1 k i = 1 k σ i = 1 n j = 1 l v j σ j
where σ 1 is the mean fatigue limit, k is the number of matched pairs, n is the number of effective specimens, l is the number of the stress levels, σ i is the i-th pair fatigue limit in the matched pair, σ j is the j-th level stress value of the stress levels, and v j is the number of the effective specimen in the j-th level stress level, whether the specimen is broken or not.
Therefore, the fatigue limit of the smooth specimen was 615MPa.The ratio of the fatigue limit to tensile strength was 0.29. The fatigue limit of the notched specimen was 363MPa. Besides this, the fatigue limit of the notched specimen was reduced by about 41% compared with the smooth specimen.

3.3. Fractography

The fracture micrographs of the smooth specimens and notched specimens of the ultra-high strength maraging steel TM210A were observed by scanning electron microscopy, as shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively. It can be seen that the fractures were composed of the crack initiation area, the crack propagation area, and the instantaneous fracture area, whether it was a smooth or notched specimen.
As shown in Figure 8, the crack initiation of the smooth specimen was at the surface of the specimen. In the vicinity of the crack initiation, the crack occurred in a quasi-cleavable way, with a distinct river pattern. The crack propagation area had obvious fatigue striations, and there were some relatively large step shapes. The instantaneous fracture area was a rough dimple.
As shown in Figure 9, the crack initiation of the notched specimen was at the front end of the annular circumference notch with a large stress concentration, in a distinct river pattern. The crack propagation area had obvious fatigue striations, and there were obvious tear edges. The instantaneous fracture area was a rough dimple.

3.4. Fatigue Notch Sensitivity Index

The theoretical elastic stress concentration factor Kt relates the local stress ahead of the notch tip to far-field loading, and is defined as the ratio of the maximum local stress σmax to the nominal stress S. Under fatigue loading conditions, the elastic stress concentration factor is replaced by the so-called fatigue notch factor:
K f = u n n o t c h e d b a r e n d u r a n c e lim i t n o t c h e d b a r e n d u r a n c e lim i t
In general, fatigue experiments suggest that notches produce a less stress-concentrating effect than predicted by theoretical elastic analysis, such that we find KfKt; KfKt for large notch-root radii and for higher strength materials. The degree of agreement between theoretical predictions of elastic stress concentration and actual effects is often measured by the so-called notch sensitivity index, which is defined as [8]
q f = K f 1 K t 1 ( 0 q f 1 )
The fatigue limits of the smooth specimen and the notched specimen of the TM210A were 615 MPa and 363 MPa, respectively. The theoretical elastic stress concentration factor Kt was 2, and, therefore, the fatigue notch sensitivity index qf was 0.69.

4. Conclusions

In order to investigate the fatigue strength and the facture mode of the ultra-high strength maraging steel TM210A, rotating bending fatigue tests were carried out using a smooth specimen and a notched specimen. The main results obtained were as follows:
(1)
The mean fatigue S–N curve and the mean fatigue limit of the smooth specimen and the notched specimen of the ultra-high strength maraging steel TM210Awere obtained in experiments. The fatigue limits of the smooth specimen and notched specimen were 615 MPa and 363 MPa, respectively. The ratio of the fatigue limit to tensile strength was 0.29. The fatigue limit of the notched specimen was reduced by about 41% compared to the smooth specimen, which indicated that the notch had a great impact on the fatigue properties of materials.
(2)
The fracture micrographs of the smooth specimens and notched specimens of the ultra-high strength maraging steel TM210A were composed of a crack initiation area, a crack propagation area, and an instantaneous fracture area. The smooth specimen crack initiated at the specimen surface, and the notched specimen crack initiated at the edge of the notch with a large stress concentration.
(3)
The fatigue notch sensitivity index of the ultra-high strength maraging steel TM210A was 0.69.

Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored by Qing’an Group Corporation Limited.

Author Contributions

Guang-qiang Yin was responsible for drafting the manuscript, conceived and designed the experiments, andexecuted the experimental tests. Xia Kang assisted Guang-qiang Yin with processing the data for the statistical analysis. Gui-ping Zhao was responsible for overseeing the project and finalizing the writing of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wei, S. Steels; Springer: London, UK, 2013; pp. 144–147. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rao, M.N. Progress in understanding the metallurgy of 18% nickel maraging steels. Int. J. Mater. Res. 2006, 97, 1594–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hoseini, S.R.E.; Arabi, H.; Razavizadeh, H. Improvement in mechanical properties of C300 maraging steel by application of VAR process. Vacuum 2008, 82, 521–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Novotny, P.M.; Maurer, G.E. Ultra-high-strength steels vs. titanium alloys. Adv. Mater. Process. 2007, 165, 37–40. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhaumik, S.K.; Sujata, M.; Venkataswamy, M.A. Fatigue failure of aircraft components. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2008, 15, 675–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Campbell, G.S.; Lahey, R. A survey of serious aircraft accidents involving fatigue fracture. Int. J. Fatigue 1984, 6, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Little, R.E.; Jebe, E.H. Statistical Design of Fatigue Experiments; Applied Science Publishers Ltd.: London, UK, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  8. Suresh, S. Fatigue of Materials, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1998; pp. 242–243. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Microstructure of theTM210A.
Figure 1. Microstructure of theTM210A.
Materials 10 01057 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of smooth round-bar fatigue specimen (unit: mm).
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of smooth round-bar fatigue specimen (unit: mm).
Materials 10 01057 g002
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of notched round-bar fatigue specimen (unit: mm).
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of notched round-bar fatigue specimen (unit: mm).
Materials 10 01057 g003
Figure 4. The S–N curve for the smooth specimens with 50% survival rate.
Figure 4. The S–N curve for the smooth specimens with 50% survival rate.
Materials 10 01057 g004
Figure 5. The S–N curve for the notched specimens with 50% survival rate.
Figure 5. The S–N curve for the notched specimens with 50% survival rate.
Materials 10 01057 g005
Figure 6. The staircase figure of smooth specimens.
Figure 6. The staircase figure of smooth specimens.
Materials 10 01057 g006
Figure 7. The staircase figure of notched specimens.
Figure 7. The staircase figure of notched specimens.
Materials 10 01057 g007
Figure 8. Microstructures of fractures of the smooth specimen: (a) Crack initiation; (b) Crack propagation; (c) Instantaneous fracture
Figure 8. Microstructures of fractures of the smooth specimen: (a) Crack initiation; (b) Crack propagation; (c) Instantaneous fracture
Materials 10 01057 g008
Figure 9. Microstructures of fractures of the notched specimen: (a) Crack initiation; (b) Crack propagation; (c) Instantaneous fracture
Figure 9. Microstructures of fractures of the notched specimen: (a) Crack initiation; (b) Crack propagation; (c) Instantaneous fracture
Materials 10 01057 g009
Table 1. Chemical composition of the TM210A (wt %).
Table 1. Chemical composition of the TM210A (wt %).
CSiMnSPNiCoMoTiAl
0.0030.090.090.0050.00417.7010.324.300.970.10
Table 2. Mechanical properties of the TM210A.
Table 2. Mechanical properties of the TM210A.
Mechanical Property
Tensile strength σb2125 MPa
Yield strength σ0.22065 MPa
Elongation δ59.5%
Reduction of area ψ60%
Impact toughness αk42 J/cm2
Fracture toughness K1C65 Mpam1/2
Hardness55 HRC
Table 3. Fatigue experimental data of the smooth specimens.
Table 3. Fatigue experimental data of the smooth specimens.
Specimen NumberStress AmplitudeFatigue LifeCommentCrack Initiation Point
1768 MPa140,200BrokenAt the specimen surface
2768 MPa203,200BrokenAt the specimen surface
3768 MPa142,100BrokenAt the specimen surface
4728 MPa152,700BrokenAt the specimen surface
5728 MPa265,300BrokenAt the specimen surface
6728 MPa130,500BrokenAt the specimen surface
7688 MPa732,300BrokenAt the specimen surface
8688 MPa189,400BrokenAt the specimen surface
9688 MPa292,300BrokenAt the specimen surface
10648 MPa534,300BrokenAt the specimen surface
11648 MPa443,000BrokenAt the specimen surface
12648 MPa678,600BrokenAt the specimen surface
13628 MPa10,077,900Run outNo
14628 MPa10,080,300Run outNo
15628 MPa10,000,000Run outNo
16628 MPa375,300BrokenAt the specimen surface
17608 MPa1,174,400BrokenAt the specimen surface
18608 MPa5,132,900BrokenAt the specimen surface
19608 MPa3,684,100BrokenAt the specimen surface
20588 MPa10,000,000Run outNo
21588 MPa10,078,200Run outNo
22588 MPa372,100BrokenAt the specimen surface
23568 MPa10,080,600Run outNo
Table 4. Fatigue experimental data of the notched specimens.
Table 4. Fatigue experimental data of the notched specimens.
Specimen NumberStress AmplitudeFatigue LifeCommentCrack Initiation Point
1473 MPa91,300BrokenAt the edge of the notch
2473 MPa70,400BrokenAt the edge of the notch
3473 MPa86,900BrokenAt the edge of the notch
4453 MPa91,300BrokenAt the edge of the notch
5453 MPa70,400BrokenAt the edge of the notch
6453 MPa86,900BrokenAt the edge of the notch
7413 MPa241,600BrokenAt the edge of the notch
8413 MPa252,600BrokenAt the edge of the notch
9413 MPa563,700BrokenAt the edge of the notch
10393 MPa485,500BrokenAt the edge of the notch
11373 MPa1,967,700BrokenAt the edge of the notch
12373 MPa1,063,000BrokenAt the edge of the notch
13373 MPa2,702,000BrokenAt the edge of the notch
14373 MPa679,000BrokenAt the edge of the notch
15373 MPa10,070,000Run outNo
16353 MPa10,068,700Run outNo
17353 MPa10,068,900Run outNo
18353 MPa10,068,000Run outNo
19353 MPa2,491,300BrokenAt the edge of the notch
20353 MPa10,072,700Run outNo
21353 MPa715,300BrokenAt the edge of the notch
22333 MPa10,074,000Run outNo
23333 MPa10,074,800Run outNo
Table 5. Fatigue life of the smooth specimens with 50% survival rate.
Table 5. Fatigue life of the smooth specimens with 50% survival rate.
S max /MPa768728688615
N 50 /cycle159,368174,221343,558107
Table 6. Fatigue life of the notched specimens with 50% survival rate.
Table 6. Fatigue life of the notched specimens with 50% survival rate.
S max /MPa473453413363
N 50 /cycle82,357173,021325,237107

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yin, G.-q.; Kang, X.; Zhao, G.-p. Fatigue Properties of the Ultra-High Strength Steel TM210A. Materials 2017, 10, 1057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10091057

AMA Style

Yin G-q, Kang X, Zhao G-p. Fatigue Properties of the Ultra-High Strength Steel TM210A. Materials. 2017; 10(9):1057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10091057

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yin, Guang-qiang, Xia Kang, and Gui-ping Zhao. 2017. "Fatigue Properties of the Ultra-High Strength Steel TM210A" Materials 10, no. 9: 1057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10091057

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop