Next Article in Journal
Novel Magnesium Elektron21-AlN Nanocomposites Produced by Ultrasound-Assisted Casting; Microstructure, Thermal and Electrical Conductivity
Next Article in Special Issue
Reactive Fabrication and Effect of NbC on Microstructure and Tribological Properties of CrS Co-Based Self-Lubricating Coatings by Laser Cladding
Previous Article in Journal
Nematic Liquid-Crystal Colloids
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Pulse Parameters on Weld Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Extra Pulse Current Aided Laser Welded 2219 Aluminum Alloy Joints
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thermal, Spectral and Laser Properties of Er3+:Yb3+:GdMgB5O10: A New Crystal for 1.5 μm Lasers

1
Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials Chemistry and Physics, Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Fuzhou 350002, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2018, 11(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11010025
Submission received: 28 November 2017 / Revised: 20 December 2017 / Accepted: 21 December 2017 / Published: 25 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Laser Materials Processing)

Abstract

:
A novel laser crystal of Er3+:Yb3+:GdMgB5O10 with dimension of 26 × 16 × 12 mm3 was grown successfully from K2Mo3O10 flux by the top seeded solution growth method. The thermal diffusivity and specific heat capacity were measured to calculate the thermal conductivity of the crystal. The absorption and fluorescence properties of the crystal at room temperature were investigated in detail. The Judd-Ofelt method was used to analyze the polarized absorption spectra. The emission cross-section of the 4I13/24I15/2 transition was calculated by the Füchtbauer-Ladenburg formula and the relevant gain cross-sections were estimated. Continuous-wave laser output of 140 mW at 1569 nm with the slope efficiency of 17.8% was demonstrated in a plano-concave resonator. The results reveal that Er3+:Yb3+:GdMgB5O10 crystal is a promising material for 1.5 μm lasers.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The Er3+ and Yb3+ co-doped materials have gained much interest as laser media for emitting eye-safe laser around 1.5 μm, which can be used in many important applications, such as optical communication, environmental sensing, and medical treatments [1,2,3,4]. Many types of laser crystals co-doped with Er3+ and Yb3+ ions have been investigated and have realized 1.5 μm laser operations successfully, such as Y3Al5O12, Y2SiO5, KY(WO4)2, YVO4, YCa4O(BO3)3 and Sr3Y2(BO3)4 [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Among them, borate crystals with high phonon energy (about 1400 cm−1), such as YCa4O(BO3)3 and Sr3Y2(BO3)4, have demonstrated the most efficient laser action with slope efficiency larger than 20%. The main drawback of YCa4O(BO3)3 and Sr3Y2(BO3)4 crystals is their lower thermal conductivities (2.2 and 1.0 WK−1 m−1, respectively) which limit the laser power due to their tendency to crack at high pumping power [12,13]. Therefore, the studies of new borate laser crystals with a large thermal conductivity and good optical properties are needed.
Recently, the Er:Yb:LaMgB5O10 (LMB) crystal with relatively large thermal conductivity (5.0 WK−1 m−1) has been realized in a continuous-wave laser at 1567 nm with maximum output power of 160 mW and a slope efficiency about 10.1% [14]. In Er-Yb codoped crystals, a large amount (~1 × 1021 atoms/cm3) of Yb3+ ions are needed because the Yb3+ ions are considered as a sensitizer to increase the absorbed pump energy and then transfer energy to the Er ions [15]. As the ionic radius of La3+ (1.216 Å) is much larger than those of Er3+ (1.004 Å) and Yb3+ (0.985 Å), it is not easy for such a large amount of Yb3+ ions to substitute for La3+ ions [16]. The low concentration of Yb3+ ions of Er:Yb:LMB crystal may be the main cause of the low energy-transfer rates and laser efficiency. The ionic radius of Gd3+ (1.053 Å) ion is much closer to that of Yb3+ ion, so the crystal GdMgB5O10 (GMB) may provide preferable condition for the Yb3+ ions, a large concentration of Yb3+ ions in GMB crystal is possible, then a more efficiency laser crystal for 1.5 μm may be acquired. Therefore, the present work is devoted to report the thermal properties, spectral properties and continuous-wave laser performance of the Er:Yb:GMB crystal.

2. Experiments

The Er:Yb:GMB crystal was grown successfully by the top seeded solution growth (TSSG) method with a flux system of K2Mo3O10. The starting materials were weighed according to the stoichiometric composition of Er0.03Yb0.20Gd0.77MgB5O10 and K2Mo3O10 in a molar ratio of 1:2. Details of the growth procedures can be found in reference [17]. A transparent Er:Yb:GMB crystal with dimensions up to 26 × 16 × 12 mm3 was obtained, which is shown in Figure 1. The Er3+ and Yb3+ concentrations in the grown crystal were calculated to be 2.12 at.% (1.39 × 1020 atoms/cm3) and 12.65 at.% (8.26 × 1020 atoms/cm3), respectively, by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES, Ultima2, Jobin-Yvon). Thus, the distribution coefficients of the Er3+ and Yb3+ ions in the GMB crystal were estimated to be 0.71 and 0.63, respectively.
A square wafer of Er:Yb:GMB crystal with dimension 10.00 × 10.00 × 2.00 mm3 was coated with graphite on opposite sides and applied for the thermal properties measurements. The laser flash method was used to detect the specific heat and thermal diffusivity coefficient in the range of 300–550 K by using a laser flash apparatus (NETZSCH LFA457). The thermal conductivity can be calculated by the results of the specific heat and thermal diffusivity coefficient.
Since Er:Yb:GMB crystal with the monoclinic system is optically biaxial, the physical properties along the three optical indicatrix axes (X, Y, Z) are different, in which the X, Y and Z represent the three principal axes of the optical indicatrix in order of nX < nY < nZ, respectively [17]. Two square wafers with dimensions of 5.00 × 5.00 × 2.00 mm3 (Z × X × Y) and 5.00 × 5.00 × 2.00 mm3 (X × Y × Z) were used for the measurements of the spectra. The polarized absorption spectra of Er:Yb:GMB crystal at the room temperature were measured using a Perkin-Elmer spectrophotometer (Lambda 950) in a range of 250–1650 nm. The polarized fluorescence spectra and fluorescence lifetime at the room temperature were recorded using FLS980 Fluorescence spectroscopy, which was excited by the steady state xenon lamp (Xe900, Edinburgh, UK) at 937 nm.
The continuous-wave laser performance of the Er:Yb:GMB crystal was investigated in a plano-concave resonator and the experimental setup is shown in Figure 2. The sample with size of 5.00 × 5.00 × 2.00 mm3 was polished accurately and not anti-reflection coated. The crystal was wrapped with indium foil and then mounted in a copper holder cooled by water at 20 °C. The pumping source was a 976 nm fiber-coupled laser diode (LD) with 100 µm diameter core. The flat input mirror has 90% transmission at 976 nm and 99.8% reflectivity at 1.5–1.6 μm. Three output couplers with the different transmissions of 1.0%, 1.6% and 4.3% at 1.5–1.6 μm and identical radius curvature of 100 mm were used in the laser experiments. The resonator length was kept at about 100 mm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Thermal Properties

The temperature-dependence of the specific heat and thermal diffusion coefficient of Er:Yb:GMB in the temperature range 300–550 K can be found in Figure 3a,b. It can be seen that specific heat is increasing from 0.733 to 1.026 J g−1 K−1 when the temperature is increased from 300 K to 550 K. In comparison with Nd:LMB (0.655 J g−1 K−1 at 300 K) [14], YCa4O(BO3)3 (0.690 J g−1 K−1 at 300 K) [12] and Sr3Y2(BO3)4 (0.531 J g−1 K−1 at 300 K) [13], the Er:Yb:GMB crystal has a relatively high specific heat of 0.733 J g−1 K−1 at 300 K, so pumped laser beam can only lead to less temperature variation in the crystal and then the crystal might have high damage threshold. The thermal diffusion coefficient decreases smoothly from 1.422 to 0.771 mm2/s in the measured temperature range. The thermal conductivity was determined by the equation κ = λρCp, where κ, λ, ρ, Cp denote thermal conductivity, thermal diffusion coefficient, density and specific heat of the Er:Yb:GMB crystal, respectively. The ρ is 4.290 g/cm3 [18]. The values of thermal conductivity of the Er:Yb:GMB crystal versus temperature were calculated and shown in Figure 4. The thermal conductivity decreases from 4.380 to 3.321 W K−1 m−1 when the temperature increases. The thermal conductivity of Er:Yb:GMB is similar to that of Nd:LMB crystal as they both have an approximately linear temperature dependence, which may indicate glass-like behavior. The thermal conductivity behavior of Er:Yb:GMB is little smaller than that of (0.8 at.%) Nd:LMB crystal (5.009 W K−1 m−1 at 300 K); the reason may be the large amount of Er3+ ions (2.12 at.%) and Yb3+ ions (12.65 at.%) doped into the crystal to substitute Gd3+ ions. The mass substitution may increase lattice distortion to a great extent which could finally reduce the thermal conductivity of the crystal, as the thermal conductivity of YAG laser crystal declined when YAG crystal doped with a high concentration of Nd3+ or Yb3+ ions [19]. So, Er:Yb:GMB crystal has a moderate thermal conductivity (4.380 W K−1 m−1 at 300 K), which means that it is appropriate for diode-pumped continuous-wave laser operation.

3.2. Spectral Characteristics

Figure 5 displays the room temperature polarized absorption spectra of the Er:Yb:GMB crystal. The most intense absorption bands around 975 nm consisted by the 2F7/22F5/2 transition of Yb3+ ions and the 4I15/24I11/2 transition of Er3+ ions, and the other bands are attributed to the transitions of Er3+ from the ground state 4I15/2 to different excited levels which were marked in the Figure 5. The absorption cross-sections σabs is determined by σabs = α/Nc, where α is the absorption coefficient and Nc is the concentration of Yb3+ ions in the Er:Yb:GMB crystal. Then, the peak absorption cross-sections at 975 nm were calculated as 0.66 × 10−20, 0.99 × 10−20 and 1.33 × 10−20 cm2 for E//X, E//Y and E//Z, respectively. Transition intensities of Er3+ ions in the GMB crystal were analyzed in the framework of the Judd-Ofelt phenomenological model [20,21]. Then the oscillator intensity parameters Ωt, transition probability A, fluorescence branching ratio β and radiative life time τrad were calculated. The detailed calculating process follows those of Reference [22,23]. The results are listed in Table 1 and Table 2.
The polarized emission spectra of the 4I13/24I15/2 transition of the Er:Yb:GMB crystal are shown in Figure 6. The broad emission bands extend from 1435 to 1650 nm, and peak at about 1515 nm. Using the Füchtbauer-Ladenburg method, the polarized emission cross-sections σem can be calculated by the following formula [24]: σ e m F L ( λ ) = λ 5 A q I q ( λ ) /   8 π n 2 c λ I q ( λ ) d λ where Aq is transition probability of 4I13/24I15/2, q indicates the polarization of the fluorescence spectra, n is the refractive index of the GMB crystal, c is the speed of light, and Iq(λ) is the relative fluorescence intensity at wavelength λ. In this work, the mean refractive index 1.40 was adopted for all the calculations. The peak emission cross-sections at 1515 nm are 0.81 × 10−20, 0.97 × 10−20 and 1.08 × 10−20 cm2 for E//X, E//Y and E//Z, respectively.
The lifetime τf of the 4I13/24I15/2 transition for Er3+ and the 2F5/22F7/2 transition for Yb3+ is about 388.7 and 10.2 μs, respectively. The efficiency of energy transfer from Yb3+ to Er3+ ions could be estimated from the formula ηET = 1 − τf0, where τf is the luminescence lifetime of Yb3+ ions in the Er-Yb co-doped GMB crystal and τ0 is the lifetime in Yb-doped GMB crystal [25]. The fluorescence decay curve of a 13.08 at.% Yb:GMB crystal is about 245 μs [17]. Therefore, the efficiency of energy transfer in the Er:Yb:GMB crystal doped with 2.12 at.% Er3+ and 12.65 at.% Yb3+ is about 95.6%. Compared with ηET (82%) in the (0.68 at.% Er3+ and 7.51 at.% Yb3+):LMB crystal, the ηET (95.6%) in the Er:Yb:GMB crystal demonstrates higher efficiency of energy transfer from Yb3+ to Er3+ ions, which may be caused by the much larger amount of Yb3+ ions doped into the crystal.
The 1.5 μm laser via the 4I13/24I15/2 transition operates in a three-level scheme and the gain cross section σgain can be obtained from the following equation [25]: σ g a i n ( λ ) = β σ e m ( λ ) ( 1 β ) σ a b s ( λ ) where β is the ratio of the number of Er3+ ions in the upper laser multiplet 4I13/2 to the total number of Er3+ ions. The calculated results of gain cross section with β = 0, 0.25, 0.5 0.75 and 1 are presented in Figure 7. It is inferred that for Er:Yb:GMB crystal, when the inversion parameter β is 0.5, the positive gain cross section can be achieved with the bands peak at 1567 nm, indicating that laser oscillation is possible to be realized around 1567 nm. It can also be seen that the value of σgain for E//Z polarization is larger than those for E//Y and E//X polarizations, which indicates that the E//Z polarization is more favorable for the laser oscillation.

3.3. Laser Performance

An optically polished Er:Yb:GMB crystal with size of 5.00 × 5.00 × 2.00 mm3 (Z × X × Y), which was chosen according to the the gain cross section spectra, was used in the laser experiment. Polarization of the output laser was measured to be parallel to the Z axis. Figure 8a shows the continuous-wave output power realized in the Er:Yb:GMB crystal versus absorbed pump power for the three output couplers described in Figure 2. It can be found from Figure 8a that the best laser performance was demonstrated for the output coupler with 4.3% transmission. For this output coupler, the slope efficiency of 17.8% and output power up to 0.14 W was achieved when the absorbed power was 2.4 W. The absorbed pump threshold power, in the case, was 1.58 W. The laser spectrum measured by a monochromator (Triax 550, Jobin-Yvon) at the absorbed pump power 2.4 W and output coupler transmission 4.3% is shown in Figure 8b. The output laser spectrum with four lines around about 1569 nm was observed. At present, although the laser performance of the Er:Yb:GMB crystal is still inferior to those of Er:Yb:YCa4O(BO3)3 (the output power of 250 mW at 1.54 μm and slope efficiency of 21.9%) [5,11] and Er:Yb:Sr3Y2(BO3)4 (1.3 W quasi-continuous-wave output power around 1.56 μm and slope efficiency of 20%) [9,15], the slope efficiency obtained in the Er:Yb:GMB (17.8%) is larger than that of Er:Yb:GMB (10.2%) [14]. On the basis of the thermal property and initial laser experimental results, the laser slope efficiency will be further enhanced provided that the crystal optical quality is improved and laser experimental conditions are optimized. Further studies and laser experiments for Er:Yb:GMB crystal are in progress.

4. Conclusions

A transparent 2.12 at.% Er3+ and 12.65 at.% Yb3+ codoped GMB crystal with dimensions of 26 × 16 × 12 mm3 was grown successfully from K2Mo3O10 flux by the top seeded solution growth method. The thermal conductivity decreases from 4.380 to 3.321 WK−1 m−1 over the temperature range of 300–550 K. Its spectral properties were investigated in detail. In the framework of the Judd-Ofelt theory, the effective intensity parameters were calculated to be Ω2 = 5.81 × 10−20 cm2, Ω4 = 1.62 × 10−20 cm2 and Ω6 = 2.39 × 10−20 cm2. Continuous-wave laser at about 1569 nm with a maximum output power of 0.14 W and a slope efficiency of 17.8% was demonstrated. These results indicate that Er:Yb:GMB crystal is a promising laser medium for 1.5 μm lasers.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDB20000000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61705231, 61775217 and 61475158), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFB0701002), and the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (Nos. 2015J01232 and 2016J01328).

Author Contributions

Yisheng Huang performed the experiments and wrote the paper; Feifei Yuan and Shijia Sun performed the experiments; Zhoubin Lin analyzed the data; Lizhen Zhang revised the content of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huber, G.; Kranke, C.; Petermann, K. Solid-state lasers: Status and future. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2010, 27, B93–B105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Krupke, W.F. Ytterbium solid-state lasers. The first decade. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2000, 6, 1287–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tolstik, N.A.; Kisel, V.E.; Kuleshov, N.V.; Maltsev, V.V.; Leonyuk, N.I. Er,Yb:YAl3(BO3)4-efficient 1.5 μm laser crystal. Appl. Phys. B 2009, 97, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bjurshagen, S.; Pasiskevicius, V.; Parreu, I.; Pujol, M.C.; Pena, A.; Aguilo, M.; Diaz, F. Crystal growth, spectroscopic characterization, and eye-safe laser operation of erbium- and ytterbium-codoped KLu(WO4)2. Appl. Opt. 2008, 47, 656–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tolstik, N.A.; Troshin, A.E.; Kurilchik, S.V.; Kisel, V.E.; Kuleshov, N.V.; Matrosov, V.N.; Matrosova, T.A.; Kupchenko, M.I. Spectroscopy, continuous-wave and Q-switched diode pumped laser operation of Er3+, Yb3+:YVO4 crystal. Appl. Phys. B 2007, 86, 275–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kuleshov, N.V.; Lagatasky, A.A.; Podlipensky, A.V.; Mikhailov, V.P.; Kornienko, A.A.; Dunina, E.B.; Hartung, S.; Huber, G. Fluorescence dynamics, excited-state absorption, and stimulated emission of Er3+ in KY(WO4)2. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1998, 15, 1205–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Schweizer, T.; Jensen, T.; Heumann, E.; Huber, G. Spectroscopic properties and diode pumped 1.6 μm laser performance in Yb-codoped Er:Y3A15O12 and Er:Y2SiO5. Opt. Commun. 1995, 118, 557–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hellström, J.E.; Pasiskevicius, V.; Laurell, F.; Denker, B.; Sverchkov, S.; Galagan, B.; Ivleva, L. Passive Q-switching at 1.54 μm of an Er-Yb:GdCa4O(BO3)3 laser with a Co2+:MgAl2O4 saturable absorber. Appl. Phys. B 2005, 81, 49–52. [Google Scholar]
  9. Huang, J.H.; Chen, Y.J.; Lin, Y.F.; Gong, X.H.; Luo, Z.D.; Huang, Y.D. High efficient 1.56 μm laser operation of Czochralski grown Er:Yb:Sr3Y2(BO3)4 crystal. Opt. Express 2008, 16, 17243–17248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gorbachenya, K.N.; Kisel, V.E.; Yasukevich, A.S.; Maltsev, V.V.; Leonyuk, N.I.; Kuleshov, N.V. Eye-safe 1.55 μm passively Q-switched Er,Yb:GdAl3(BO3)4 diode-pumped laser. Opt. Lett. 2016, 41, 918–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wang, P.; Dawes, J.; Burns, P.; Piper, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, L.; Meng, X. Diode-pumped cw tunable Er3+:Yb3+:YCOB laser at 1.5–1.6 μm. Opt. Mater. 2002, 19, 383–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Luo, J.; Fan, S.; Xie, H.; Xiao, K.; Qian, G.; Zhang, Z.; Qian, G.; Sun, R.; Xu, J. Thermal and Nonlinear Optical Properties of Ca4YO(BO3)3. Cryst. Res. Technol. 2001, 36, 1212–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pan, Z.; Gong, H.; Yu, H.; Zhang, H.; Wang, J.; Boughton, R. Growth, morphology and anisotropic thermal properties of Nd-doped Sr3Y2(BO3)4 crystal. J. Cryst. Growth 2013, 363, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huang, Y.; Sun, S.; Yuan, F.; Zhang, L.; Lin, Z. Spectroscopic properties and continuous-wave laser operation of Er3+:Yb3+:LaMgB5O10 crystal. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 395, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Huang, J.H.; Chen, Y.J.; Lin, Y.F.; Gong, X.H.; Luo, Z.D.; Huang, Y.D. Spectral and laser properties of Er:Yb:Sr3Lu2(BO3)4 crystal at 1.5–1.6 μm. Opt. Mater. Express 2013, 3, 1885–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shannon, R.D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. 1976, A32, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, Y.; Lou, F.; Sun, S.; Yuan, F.; Zhang, L.; Lin, Z.; You, Z. Spectroscopy and laser performance of Yb3+:GdMgB5O10 crystal. J. Lumin. 2017, 188, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fan, J.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, L.; Wang, G. Phase diagram, growth and spectral properties of Nd3+:GdMg(BO2)5 crystal. J. Alloy. Compd. 2007, 436, 252–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, B.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, X.; Sun, H.; Yin, S. Study on Thermal Conductivity of the Doped GSGG Laser Crystals. J. Synth. Cryst. 2006, 35, 912–916. [Google Scholar]
  20. Judd, B.R. Optical absorption intensities of rare-earth ions. Phys. Rev. 1962, 127, 750–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ofelt, G.S. Intensities of crystal spectra of rare-earth ions. J. Chem. Phys. 1962, 37, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, C.; Wyon, C.; Moncorge, R. Spectroscopic Properties and Fluorescence Dynamics of Er3+ and Yb3+ in Y2SiO5. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1992, 28, 1209–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, J.H.; Chen, Y.J.; Lin, Y.F.; Gong, X.H.; Luo, Z.D.; Huang, Y.D. Spectral properties of Er3+-doped CaGdAlO4 crystal for laser application around 1.55 μm. J. Alloy. Compd. 2014, 585, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Aull, B.F.; Jenssen, H.P. Vibronic Interactions in Nd:YAG Resulting in Nonreciprocity of Absorption and Stimulated-Emission Cross-Sections. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1982, 18, 925–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Burns, P.A.; Dawes, J.M.; Dekker, P.; Piper, J.A.; Jiang, H.D.; Wang, J.Y. Optimization of Er,Yb:YCOB for CW laser operation. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 2004, 40, 1575–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The Er:Yb:GMB crystal grown from the top seeded solution growth (TSSG) method.
Figure 1. The Er:Yb:GMB crystal grown from the top seeded solution growth (TSSG) method.
Materials 11 00025 g001
Figure 2. Experimental setup of LD-end-pumped Er:Yb:GMB laser.
Figure 2. Experimental setup of LD-end-pumped Er:Yb:GMB laser.
Materials 11 00025 g002
Figure 3. Specific heat and thermal diffusivity versus temperature curve of Er:Yb:GMB.
Figure 3. Specific heat and thermal diffusivity versus temperature curve of Er:Yb:GMB.
Materials 11 00025 g003
Figure 4. Thermal conductivity versus temperature curve of Er:Yb:GMB.
Figure 4. Thermal conductivity versus temperature curve of Er:Yb:GMB.
Materials 11 00025 g004
Figure 5. Polarized absorption spectra of Er:Yb:GMB crystal at room temperature.
Figure 5. Polarized absorption spectra of Er:Yb:GMB crystal at room temperature.
Materials 11 00025 g005
Figure 6. Polarized luminescence spectra of Er:Yb:GMB crystal at room temperature.
Figure 6. Polarized luminescence spectra of Er:Yb:GMB crystal at room temperature.
Materials 11 00025 g006
Figure 7. Gain spectra of the 4I13/24I15/2 transition of Er3+ ions in Er:Yb:GMB crystal for E//Z, E//Y and E//X.
Figure 7. Gain spectra of the 4I13/24I15/2 transition of Er3+ ions in Er:Yb:GMB crystal for E//Z, E//Y and E//X.
Materials 11 00025 g007
Figure 8. (a) Continuous-wave output power realized in the Er:Yb:GMB crystal for different transmissions T; (b) Laser spectra of Er:Yb:GMB when the absorbed pump power is 2.4 W.
Figure 8. (a) Continuous-wave output power realized in the Er:Yb:GMB crystal for different transmissions T; (b) Laser spectra of Er:Yb:GMB when the absorbed pump power is 2.4 W.
Materials 11 00025 g008
Table 1. Average wavelengths, measured and calculated oscillator strengths, the intensity parameters Ωt of the Er:Yb:GMB crystal.
Table 1. Average wavelengths, measured and calculated oscillator strengths, the intensity parameters Ωt of the Er:Yb:GMB crystal.
Transition (from 4I15/2) λ ¯ (nm)E//ZE//YE//X
fexp × 106fcal × 106fexp × 106fcal × 106fexp × 106fcal × 106
4I13/215151.981.99 (ed)2.422.51 (ed)1.851.82 (ed)
0.43 (md) 0.43 (md) 0.43 (md)
4I9/27980.310.360.360.410.270.31
4F9/26552.622.603.093.182.392.32
4S3/25390.740.790.881.010.680.72
2H11/25206.517.307.698.557.829.14
4F7/24882.962.934.433.682.362.65
4G11/237813.7712.9116.0415.1217.5716.17
RMS error (%) 10.0110.7813.53
Ωt (1020 cm2) Ω2 = 4.95
Ω4 = 1.77
Ω6 = 2.26
Ω2 = 5.77
Ω4 = 2.10
Ω6 = 2.86
Ω2 = 6.69
Ω4 = 1.56
Ω6 = 2.04
Ωeff = (Ωx + Ωy + Ωz)/3, Ω2 = 5.81, Ω4 = 1.62, Ω6 = 2.39
Table 2. Calculated radiative transition rates A, luminescence branching ratios β, and radiative lifetimes τr of the Er:Yb:GMB crystal.
Table 2. Calculated radiative transition rates A, luminescence branching ratios β, and radiative lifetimes τr of the Er:Yb:GMB crystal.
J’→Jλ (nm)E//ZE//YE//Xτr (ms)
A (s−1)β (%)A (s−1)β (%)A (s−1)β (%)
4I13/24I15/21542151.2100183.8100141.01006.30
4I11/24I13/2274527.314.532.713.925.814.25.03
4I15/2987160.985.5202.386.1155.785.8
4I9/24I11/244881.71.01.90.91.61.15.65
4I13/2170359.734.275.836.054.235.0
4I15/2809113.064.8133.163.198.963.9
4F9/24I9/234664.90.45.50.35.80.50.68
4I11/2195683.05.8103.46.079.46.2
4I13/2114258.84.170.84.154.94.3
4I15/26561137.289.71561.989.71137.289.1
4S3/24F9/231250.90.041.10.040.80.040.46
4I9/2166569.73.387.33.362.73.3
4I11/2121543.82.155.52.139.72.1
4I13/2842589.228.1749.328.2534.828.1
4I15/25451390.366.41767.966.41261.966.5

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, Y.; Yuan, F.; Sun, S.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, L. Thermal, Spectral and Laser Properties of Er3+:Yb3+:GdMgB5O10: A New Crystal for 1.5 μm Lasers. Materials 2018, 11, 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11010025

AMA Style

Huang Y, Yuan F, Sun S, Lin Z, Zhang L. Thermal, Spectral and Laser Properties of Er3+:Yb3+:GdMgB5O10: A New Crystal for 1.5 μm Lasers. Materials. 2018; 11(1):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11010025

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Yisheng, Feifei Yuan, Shijia Sun, Zhoubin Lin, and Lizhen Zhang. 2018. "Thermal, Spectral and Laser Properties of Er3+:Yb3+:GdMgB5O10: A New Crystal for 1.5 μm Lasers" Materials 11, no. 1: 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11010025

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop