Next Article in Journal
New Development in the Preparation of Micro/Nano-Wires of Molecular (Magnetic) Conductors
Next Article in Special Issue
Injectable, Biodegradable Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Fabrication Methods of Filler/Polymer Nanocomposites: With Focus on Simple Melt-Compounding-Based Approach without Surface Modification of Nanofillers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Toward High-Performance Coatings for Biomedical Devices: Study on Plasma-Deposited Fluorocarbon Films and Ageing in PBS
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biophysical Cueing and Vascular Endothelial Cell Behavior

1
Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
2
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
3
Department of Opthalmology and Vision Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2010, 3(3), 1620-1639; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3031620
Submission received: 1 February 2010 / Revised: 25 February 2010 / Accepted: 4 March 2010 / Published: 5 March 2010
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Biomaterials)

Abstract

:
Human vascular endothelial cells (VEC) line the vessels of the body and are critical for the maintenance of vessel integrity and trafficking of biochemical cues. They are fundamental structural elements and are central to the signaling environment. Alterations in the normal functioning of the VEC population are associated with a number of vascular disorders among which are some of the leading causes of death in both the United States and abroad. VECs attach to their underlying stromal elements through a specialization of the extracellular matrix, the basement membrane. The basement membrane provides signaling cues to the VEC through its chemical constituents, by serving as a reservoir for cytoactive factors and through its intrinsic biophysical properties. This specialized matrix is composed of a topographically rich 3D felt-like network of fibers and pores on the nano (1–100 nm) and submicron (100–1,000 nm) size scale. The basement membrane provides biophysical cues to the overlying VECs through its intrinsic topography as well as through its local compliance (relative stiffness). These biophysical cues modulate VEC adhesion, migration, proliferation, differentiation, and the cytoskeletal signaling network of the individual cells. This review focuses on the impact of biophysical cues on VEC behaviors and demonstrates the need for their consideration in future vascular studies and the design of improved prosthetics.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Vascular diseases are the leading cause of death in developed countries [1,2]. Coronary heart disease alone is the cause of 1 in every 7 deaths worldwide [3,4]. In addition, more than 12 million people in the United States are treated for peripheral artery disease, and endothelial cell dysfunction is a known contributor to the progression of this disorder [2,5]. Pulmonary hypertension, another major vascular disease, is characterized by vessel wall distension which results in thickening of the wall and leads to decreased vessel compliance, narrowing, and occlusion [6]. There is a great need for an improved understanding of endothelial function. Elucidation of the interactions between vascular endothelial cells and the extracellular microenvironment will lead to improved strategies for the treatment of vascular disease.
Currently available treatments for vascular diseases depend on the severity of the diagnosis. In less severe cases, drug therapy in the form of vasodilators, diuretics, beta-blockers, statins [7], and a menu of other pharmaceutical therapies are used. In more severe disease states, surgical grafts are often necessary [3,4,8,9]. In cases where vessel grafting is required, autologous tissues are preferred. However, 7% of patients do not have suitable tissue for harvest due to widely distributed disease progression [10,11,12,13]. In cases where autologous transplants are not available, several alternative options including heterogenic donation or synthetic vascular implants are employed [14]. However, heterologous grafts have limitations with potential immunologic response in the patient and insufficient donor availability. There is a demonstrable need for synthetic vascular replacements with optimal biointegration and performance parameters.
Currently, there are a variety of synthetic vascular implants available for high flow large vessels developed from Dacron and other synthetic polymers. The failure rate for small vessels (less than 5 mm in size) remains high due to thrombosis and resulting occlusion of the graft [15,16,17]. The direct involvement of vascular endothelial cells (VECs) in vascular disease has been demonstrated and the establishment of a functional endothelium in prosthetics is critical to their success [3,7]. Graft failure is primarily due to a lack of endothelium and differences in stretch, local compliance, and vascular resistance (the change in diameter of a vessel under pressure) between the native vessel and the graft. Graft failure can lead to progression of atherosclerotic disease, thrombosis, or hyperplasia [14,18,19]. To improve clinical success rates of vascular grafts, strategies that make the graft more “biomimetic” in terms of surface chemistry and mechanical attributes are being explored. One approach is to mimic the native biophysical features which directly impact endothelial cell function and homeostasis.
The importance of the mechanical properties of vessels and their direct impact on disease has been known for decades [20]. Alterations in the biophysical microenvironment of endothelial cells, which include the underlying basement membrane, have been implicated in the homeostatic state of the vascular tissue leading to various vascular pathologies [21,22,23,24,25]. Vascular scaffolds for guided tissue regeneration have been developed but the biophysical features including topography and compliance of the native vessel have not yet been fully incorporated into prosthetic design and their absence may be a contributing factor to prosthetic vessel failure [14,26]. Topographic features of the vascular basement membrane from several different anatomic sites have been characterized and been found to range in size from the nano to submicron scale [27]. In addition, the thickness of the basement membrane of different vascular tissues can vary significantly. This observation suggests that the variations in thickness have an impact on another biophysical feature, compliance [28]. The effect of compliance on endothelial behavior has been observed in vascular angiogenesis as well as in endothelial cell migration, adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation [29,30,31,32,33,34]. These biophysical cues affect the endothelial cells at the molecular level. Ongoing work from our laboratory have shown that 4,000 genes in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVEC) were found to exhibit a greater than 2 fold change in expression (up or downregulated) when cultured on sub-micron to nano-topographically patterned surfaces as compared to flat surfaces [35]. The combined effects of these extracellular cues suggest that incorporating these attributes into prosthetic design may favorably impact endothelial cell function and graft performance. The focus of this review is to demonstrate the need for the consideration biophysical cues, such as topography and compliance, in future vascular studies and the design of improved prosthetics based on the evidence that these cues have a critical impact on VEC behaviors.

2. Vascular Endothelial Cells

The proper functioning of the vascular network within the human body is essential for every cell, tissue and organ. Blood vessels are involved in the distribution of oxygen and diffusion constraints limit the distance of nearly every cell to be within 100–200 µm from a blood vessel [36]. In capillary beds the circumference of the vessel can contain as little as one endothelial cell [37]. Intrinsic to vessel structure are vascular endothelial cells and their associated basement membrane as well as the stromal elements of the vessel wall including smooth muscle cells [36,38]. This simple squamous epithelium was historically thought to be little more than a barrier; studies have since demonstrated the complex functionality and heterogeneity of these cells [39]. The rich diversity of endothelial cells is due to a complex network of endothelial progenitor cells that give rise to the various endothelial cell types including a circulating population [40,41]. VECs line the vessels of the body and are responsible for the correct trafficking of chemical signals and immune cells [42]. Additionally, VECs provide structural support to the vessel [24,43]. Chemical “communication” between VECs is done through intercellular junctions including caveolae [39]. Vasculogenesis, the process of new blood vessel formation, is the result of migrating and subsequently proliferating endothelial cells induced by physical and chemotactic signals [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]. The formation of new blood vessels is critical for development, and normal adult processes such as wound healing. New blood vessel formation also characterizes many pathologic states including cancer metastasis [52,53,54]. Recent studies have shown that the contractile forces generated by the VEC cytoskeleton in conjunction with matrix stiffness and biochemical cues regulate vasculogenesis [55].
In addition to regulating vasculogenesis, biophysical cues also regulate resistance to physical stresses. VECs undergo a great deal of mechanical stress when subjected to shear flow or pulsate stress [56,57,58,59,60]. To resist these stresses, biophysical and biochemical signals initiate remodeling of the VEC cytoskeleton to form actin stress fibers [6,56,57,58,61]. VEC cytoskeletal structure and organization largely determines their intrinsic biophysical properties. The endothelial cell cortex contains a cytoskeletal meshwork of two different size scales. The larger meshwork is composed principally of actin fibers forming pores ranging from 0.5–1.0 µm2. Intertwined within the larger network is a smaller meshwork (<0.5 µm2) that is less rigid than the larger meshwork [62]. The combined rigidity of these two meshworks are thought to be responsible for the local compliance (Young’s modulus) of the individual endothelial cells. Thus, the two meshworks are thought to be responsible for the Young’s modulus of the cell; that is, the resistance to deformation or the rigidity of the cells in response to external forces such as blood pressure. The unit of measure of Young’s modulus is the Pascal. The local compliance of endothelial cells also varies depending on the spatial location along the cell from which the measurement is obtained. Values for Young’s modulus (compliance) from different areas of the endothelial cell have been obtained and are reported to be approximately 5–7 kiloPascals (kPa) in the region of the nucleus and 0.32–3 kPa in the cytosolic region [42,43,59,63,64,65]. Endothelial cells are exposed to shear stress from fluid flow in vivo and measurements of the local compliance of endothelial cells under these conditions demonstrate a 2-fold decrease in compliance (becomes stiffer) [56]. The aforementioned results support the idea that the mechanical properties of endothelial cells play an important role in the vascular permeability between the tight junctions of the cells and resistance to shear stress from fluid flow [43,61]. These endothelial cell properties are essential for the strength and integrity of the vessel and their regulation by biophysical cues demonstrate the importance of extracellular biophysical cues in both native vessels and prosthetic design.
Biophysical cues also play an important role in disease states, VEC failure in the form of aberrant permeability, rigidity, or receptor expression is related to several diseases including ischemic heart disease and atherosclerosis [5,66]. Collapse of the endothelial cell cytoskeleton can lead to vessel collapse [24]. In response to hypertension, VECs are capable of remodeling the vascular wall [25]. Onset of atherosclerosis is a consequence of interactions among the smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, and monocytes (which have been shown to decrease the compliance and adhesiveness of endothelial cells) contributing to an increase in deformability [67,68]. Furthermore, response by the endothelium following injury (or disease states) can lead to increased secretion of basement membrane proteins and basal lamina hyperplasia [66]. In aberrant conditions, inappropriate cues due to deformation of the basement membrane are associated with several vascular disorders including muscular dystrophy, skin disorders, and kidney defects [21,22,69]. In aggregate, these data lead us to the hypothesis that the local compliance of the stromal elements of the vessel (possibly including the basement membrane) is decreased in certain disease states and that this change in local compliance directly participates in disease progression (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Basement membrane topography and compliance.
Figure 1. Basement membrane topography and compliance.
Materials 03 01620 g001
The basement membrane is a rich felt-like meshwork containing pores and fibers arranged in an isotropic manner with feature sizes ranging from the submicron level (100–1000 nm) to the nanoscale (1–100 nm). The impact of simulating biomimetically relevant topographic features has been shown to change over 4,000 genes more than 2-fold up or down compared to flat surfaces. Substratum topography has been shown to modulate cell adhesion, migration, proliferation, and differentiation. Additionally, the presence of topographic cues can modulate the response of cells to cytoactive molecules present in the soluble signaling environment. The local compliance of the basement membrane has been reported to be between 8–35 kPa. Changes in compliance have been demonstrated to impact cell morphology, differentiation, migration, and compliance. In disease states such as atherosclerosis the basement membrane has been shown have increased thickness in some vessels. Additionally, endothelial cells have been shown to secrete basement membrane components and the overall vessel is less compliant (and thus stiffer and more rigid and resistant to external forces such as blood pressure) in some disease states. The combination of this evidence leads us to the hypothesis that the compliance of the stromal elements of the vessel (possibly including the basement membrane) is decreasing in certain disease states and this change in compliance directly participates in disease progression. Furthermore, the use of pathomimetic substrates which appropriately simulate the increased rigidity observed in some disease states will lead to a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind basement membrane remodeling in changes in endothelial cell morphology (Scale bar = 600 nm).
The biophysical properties of endothelial cells can be altered by disease as well as by therapeutic agents. One example is evident in atherosclerosis where secretion of oxidized low-density lipoproteins lead to increased VEC stiffness and dysfunction [65]. In addition, the secreted lipoproteins deposit within the underlying basement membrane which we hypothesize alters the biophysical properties of the matrix initiating further changes in the overlying endothelial cells in a feedback loop mechanism [39]. This evidence suggests that a complex feedback loop between the endothelial cells and the biophysical attributes of the basement membrane may be occurring resulting in either maintenance of homeostasis or disease progression. New developments in the treatment of heart disease utilize mineralocorticoids or glucocorticoids which have been shown to cause enlarged, stiffened cells or strengthened cell-cell contacts, respectively [64]. Therapeutic interventions with hormones such as 17β-estradiol has been shown to increase endothelial cell volume, surface area, and elasticity through inhibition of Na+/H+ exchange thus providing protective effects against the onset of atherosclerosis [70]. Both the presence of disease and many therapeutic interventions impact the biophysical properties of endothelial cells. A better understanding of the regulation of these properties would lead to novel insights into both disease progression and improved treatments.
In contrast to the aberrant response of endothelial cell in disease states, providing biomimetic biophysical cues will likely promote normal endothelial cell behavior and the migration of endothelial progenitor cells into a transplanted vessel [71]. Once the graft is populated, endothelial progenitor cells can provide a native endothelial cell lining in addition to secreting basement membrane and signaling molecules for the subsequent trafficking of cytoactive factors [7,71,72,73]. Overall, endothelial cells “sense” both the topography and local compliance of their extracellular microenvironment, represented primarily by the basement membrane and actively respond to changes therein [29,30,74].

3. Basmenet Membrane

The basement membrane is a specialization of the ECM secreted by the endothelial cells themselves [75,76]. Found basolaterally to all endothelial cell monolayers [77], the native basement membrane of VECs is a complex, heterogenic mixture of collagen IV and V, laminin, enactin/nidogen, fibronectin, the heparin-sulfate proteoglycans perlacan, and an assortment of other proteins present at lower levels [22,28,74,76,78,79,80,81,82,83,84]. The vascular basement membrane is found on the periphery of the tunica intima next to the tunica media which contains the smooth muscle cells [85]. The combination of the chemical and physical cues, provided by the self assembled layer of proteins that compose the basement membrane and supporting cells (such as smooth muscle cells), are major elements of the VEC microenvironment [86,87,88].
The composition of all basement membranes includes the basal lamina, which includes the lamina lucida (15–65 nm thick) and lamina densa (15–125 nm thick). There is one report suggesting that the lamina lucida may be a dehydration artifact from fixation but a consensus has not been reached thus far [89]. In some tissues a lamina fibrorecticularis (2–15 µm) is also described [78,82,90,91,92] The basement membrane self assembles to provide support for the overlying endothelial cells as well as providing the VECs a variety of biochemical cues [22,28,76,79,82]. The VECs are located over a thin basal lamina which in small vessels or capillaries encloses the pericytes [38,84]. In larger vessels this thin layer separates the VECs from the smooth muscle cells [84]. VECs anchor to, and interact with, the basement membrane and ECM through focal adhesions which are composed of integrin, talin, vinculin, α-actinin, and other proteins [28,76]. While several mechanisms may be involved, the formation and maintenance of the focal adhesions is regulated by Rho and the corresponding signaling cascade [76,93]. Basement membranes also serve as a reservoir of cytoactive factors including growth hormones and other signaling molecules [76,94].
In addition to soluble and surface associated biochemical cues, the basement membrane provides a variety of biophysical cues [28,78,82,95]. Topographically, the endothelial basement membrane is comprised of nano and submicron scale features arranged in a felt-like meshwork [28,96]. The local compliance (Young’s modulus) of the native basement membrane of vasculature is between 8–70 kPa, though some researchers have reported values greater than 100 kPa and one report is in the MPa range, though this tissue was frozen prior to analysis and the reported modulus is not consistent with the other literature [23,97,98,99,100]. These discrepancies may be the result of vascular stiffening or the differences in the acquisition and analysis of atomic force microscopic data. Reported values for the compliance of the human corneal basement membranes range from 2–80 kPa suggesting that the compliance for basement membranes is generally 100 kPa or lower [75].
Biophysical cues also participate in the initiation and cessation of angiogenesis. During angiogenesis the basement membrane is degraded by matrix metalloproteinases limiting the presence of collagen type IV [101,102]. The ECM, containing a high laminin content [101], stretches out and its increased compliance promotes migration and proliferation [30]. Additionally, this scaffold provides critical biophysical and organizational cues to endothelial cells during migration into vessel tips [95,101].

4. Biomaterials

Several attempts have been made to replicate the biophysical features of basement membranes. Matrigel is a commercially available product that is commonly used as a basement membrane replacement. While it has yet to be fully defined, it is derived from a mouse tumor model and is considered basement membrane-like [77,103]. Our laboratories have documented Matrigel to posses topographic features and intrinsic compliance very similar to those found for native basement membranes. The reported modulus of Matrigel ranges from 120–450 Pa depending on whether the value was measured at or below 37 °C with the softer values in overall compliance measured at lower temperatures where Matrigel begins to loose its gel characteristics [103]. The topographic features of Matrigel have been defined and quantitated using SEM and are similar to those of native basement membranes [27,103]. Matrigel has also been combined with silk based electrospun fibers to simulate biomimetic mechanical properties and topography [104].
Decellularized, sterilized, explants have also been used as vascular scaffolds in mice. No immune response was detected and the grafts appear to remain patent, however, the explants were not tested long term [1]. Other efforts to incorporate topographic cues from biological sources have employed donor derived amniotic basement membranes from heterogenic sources [105]. Substantive research has also been performed on collagen gels to serve as mimics of ECM [106]. Synthetic surfaces such as polyvinyl alcohol gels have also been engineered with organic protein coated surfaces to serve as prosthetic membranes and these mimic some of the elastic characteristics of vessels [107]. To date, an optimal biomaterial for use as a vascular graft has not been identified. The cause of failure of previous efforts is multifaceted including the lack of integrating biomimetic topographic and compliance cues.

5. Topography

Basement membranes possess a rich topography consisting of holes, fibers, and bumps arranged in a felt-like structure [27,28,76,77,96,108,109] The effects of micron scale topographic cues on endothelial cell proliferation, adhesion, and migration under shear stress and non-stress conditions have been previously reported [110,111,112,113]. Individual topographic features of native basement membranes, however, are much smaller, residing in the nano-submicron range. While micron scale topography does impact cell behavior, these size scales are too large to be biomimetically relevant and submicron to nanometer scale features have demonstrated a greater impact on cell behavior. The effects of nanotopographic cues have been shown to be critically involved in cell migration, proliferation, adhesion, and protein and gene expression [78,114,115,116,117,118,119]. The influence of topography has even been shown to regulate differentiation [120,121,122]. Efforts to study nanotopographic cues in order to replicate native basement membrane and eventually improve vascular prosthetics have only recently been reported [3,78,105,123,124,125,126,127,128]. In addition, most prosthetics have included topographic features which are much larger (greater than 1 um) than that found in the native VEC basement membrane.
As stated earlier, endothelial cells have been shown to react to biophysical cues with changes in cell behavior. Human endothelial progenitor cells studied on anisotropically ordered ridge and groove patterned substrates were found to exhibit changes in orientation, migration, alignment, and reduced proliferation [129]. Similar studies performed by our laboratory and others on cell types other than VEC have found that cell culture on nanotopographically patterned silicon wafers impacts cell adhesion [128], migration [130], proliferation [131], orientation, alignment [132], and differentiation [116,122,127]. In aggregate, these studies have demonstrated that topographically patterned surfaces containing features in the nano-submicron range profoundly influence a broad menu of cell behaviors and these features are critical in the design of improved vascular prosthetics.
Metal-based and other synthetic surfaces including nickel-titanium and titanium oxide alloys have been used in a number of studies to produce vascular stents with the incorporation of topographic features [3,124,125,133,134,135]. Furthermore, studies using nickel-titanium surfaces with isotropically ordered submicron to nanometer features have demonstrated that endothelial cells align in a similar pattern to natural endothelium [3]. Studies using calcium phosphate ceramic particles found that varying the micron level size of the particles and the particle shape controlled the differentiation of endothelial progenitor cells [136]. Polyethylene glycol chains have also been employed to create nanometer scale roughness on smooth surfaces and it was found that surface features on the scale of 10–100 nm improved both cell adhesion and proliferation [126]. Electrospinning of polyurethane and other polymers have successfully simulated ECM topography’s submicron scale but have not successfully incorporated biomimetic values of local compliance to date [137]. A number of these studies have concluded that sub-micron to nanoscale topographic features promote endothelial cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation [3,124,125,129,133,134].
Our group has employed reactive ion etching and electron beam lithography to simulate the various topographic features of the basement membrane and tested a variety of cell types on these surfaces including endothelial cells [27,75,76,78,131,138,139]. Additionally, we have shown that the impacts of topographic cues are augmented by the presence of the soluble chemical cues found in serum [139]. Cells on anisotropically ordered ridge and groove patterned surfaces exhibited contact guidance, and cellular alignment which was not observed on isotropically ordered surfaces with holes [76,115,128,139]. Cell shape has been shown to be controlled by topographically patterned surfaces and control of cell shape has been shown to regulate cell fate [76,114]. Surface feature depth was also shown to induce greater alignment response on feature depths ≥300 nm [76,78,114]. The shape of the feature, independent of feature size, has also been shown to impact cell alignment, migration, and focal adhesion formation and size [27,115,128,131,138,139].

6. Compliance

The local compliance of the basement membrane is quantified by Young’s modulus, which describes the resistance to deformation of the substrate that the endothelial cells are in contact with [75,97,98,99,140,141]. Local compliance is distinguished from the term vascular resistance which refers to the change in diameter of a vessel under pressure [18,25]. Burst pressure resistance has also been engineered into current vascular prosthetics, and is referred to as compliance by some authors [142]. While resistance to both types of stress is important, few prosthetics include local compliance as a critical design parameter. The local compliance of the basement membrane is an important biophysical cue that modulates the migration, proliferation, differentiation, adhesion, and membrane organization of endothelial cells [32,33,74,75,119,143,144,145,146,147]. The majority of in vitro compliance studies have employed polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), polyacrylamide, alginate, or agarose [143]. Recent reports have demonstrated that aortic smooth muscle cells spread and organize their cytoskeleton to a greater degree on stiff gels (modulus of 66 kPa or greater) compared to softer gels (modulus of 22 kPa or less [32,146]. Endothelial cells have been shown to change their cellular functions in response to matrix stiffness [148,149]. Increasing matrix stiffness has also been shown to decrease vascular network formation [148].
The behavior of endothelial and endothelial progenitor cells on compliant surfaces has yet to be fully explored. However, in the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to repair infracted heart tissue it was found that myosin/actin striations form on gels with a normal muscle Young’s modulus (~12 kPa) but not on softer or stiffer gels simulating dystrophic muscle [33]. Further studies using MSCs found that even softer gel environments (elastic modulus ~1 kPa) lead to differentiation of MSCs into neurogenic lineages, moderately stiff gels lead to myogenic lineages (elastic modulus ~10 kPa), and stiff gels (elastic modulus ~ 100 kPa) lead to osteogenic lineages [147,150]. Studies combining MSCs and endothelial cells found that mechanically straining the MSCs increased endothelial cell proliferation [151]. Other studies have found that combining MSCs with endothelial cells in stiff fibrin matrices results in vessel formation with increased compressive stiffness [152]. Studies have also employed nano-particles to decrease the compliance of simulated basement membrane [153]. The accumulated evidence suggest that the biophysical cues provided by different compliant environments have a powerful impact on the differentiation potential of endothelial progenitor cells contribute to the heterogeneous nature of the vascular endothelial cell populations in different vessels sizes and types.

7. Conclusions

Local basement membrane compliance and topography are important intrinsic biophysical attributes of the microenvironment of vascular endothelial cells (VECs). These properties participate in the maintenance of homeostasis and likely contribute to the pathogenesis of disease states. A growing body of evidence documents VEC behaviors to be profoundly modulated by these biophysical cues. The use of synthetic matrices with biophysical attributes that mimic the normal native (homeomimetic) and disease (pathomimetic) states of vessels will contribute to our understanding of VEC biology in health and disease. The integration of topographic cues and local compliance has been shown to dramatically influence nearly every aspect of endothelial cell behavior. The combined findings that topography and local compliance play such a central role in VEC behavior (i.e., differentiation, adhesion, proliferation, migration, and cytoskeletal organization) suggests that incorporating both of these biophysical attributes into vascular prosthetic design and fabrication will lead to improved performance.

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by grants from the National Institute of Health, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute 1R01HL079012-01A1 and the National Eye Institute 1R01EY017367-01A.

References and Notes

  1. Derham, C.; Yow, H.; Ingram, J.; Fisher, J.; Ingham, E.; Korrosis, S.A.; Homer-Vanniasinkam, S. Tissue engineering small-diameter vascular grafts: Preparation of a biocompatible porcine ureteric scaffold. Tissue Eng. A 2008, 14, 1871–1882. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sun, G.; Gerecht, S. Vascular regeneration: Engineering the stem cell microenvironment. Regen. Med. 2009, 4, 435–447. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lu, J.; Rao, M.P.; MacDonald, N.C.; Khang, D.; Webster, T.J. Improved endothelial cell adhesion and proliferation on patterned titanium surfaces with rationally designed, micrometer to nanometer features. Acta Biomater. 2008, 4, 192–201. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mackay, J.; Mensah, G.A. The Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  5. Shaw, L.J.; Bugiardini, R.; Merz, C.N.B. Women and ischemic heart disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009, 54, 1561–1575. [Google Scholar]
  6. Muthurangu, V.; Atkinson, D.; Sermesant, M.; Miquel, M.E.; Hegde, S.; Johnson, R.; Andriantsimiavona, R.; Taylor, A.M.; Baker, E.; Tulloh, R.; Hill, D.; Razavi, R.S. Measurement of total pulmonary arterial compliance using invasive pressure monitoring and MR flow quantification during MR-guided cardiac catheterization. Am. J. Physiol. Heart. Circ. Physiol. 2005, 289, H1301–H1306. [Google Scholar]
  7. Libby, P.; Ridker, P.M.; Maseri, A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation 2002, 105, 1135–1143. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hlatky, M.A.; Boothroyd, D.B.; Bravata, D.M.; Boersma, E.; Booth, J.; Brooks, M.M.; Carrie, D.; CLayton, T.C.; Danchin, N.; Flather, M.; Hamm, C.W.; Hueb, W.A.; Kahler, J.; Kelsey, S.F.; King, S.B.; Kosinski, A.S.; Lopes, N.; McDonald, K.M.; Rodriguez, A.; Serruys, P.; Sigwart, U.; Stables, R.H.; Owens, D.K.; Pocock, S.J. Coronary bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel disease: A collaborative analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials. Lancet 2009, 373, 1190–1197. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rosamond, W.; Flegal, K.; Friday, G.; Furie, K.; Go, A.; Greenlund, K.; Haase, N.; Ho, M.; Howard, V.; Kissela, B.; Kittner, S.; Lloyd-Jones, D.; McDermott, M.; Meigs, J.; Moy, C.; Nichol, G.; O'Donnell, C.J.; Roger, V.; Rumsfeld, J.; Sorlie, P.; Steinberger, J.; Thom, T.; Wasserthiel-Smoller, S.; Hong, Y.; Committee, f.t.A.H.A.S. Stroke statistics subcommittee, heart disease and stroke statistics−2007 update: A report from the american heart association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. Circulation 2007, 115, e69–e171. [Google Scholar]
  10. Campbell, G.R.; Campbell, J.H. Development of tissue engineered vascular grafts. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2007, 8, 43–50. [Google Scholar]
  11. Piccone, V. Modern Vascular Grafts; McGraw Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  12. Darling, R.C.; Linton, R.R. Durability of femoropopliteal reconstructions. Endarterectomy versus vein bypass grafts. Am. J. Surg. 1972, 123, 472. [Google Scholar]
  13. Michaels, A.D.; Chatteriee, K. Cardiology patient pages. Angioplasty versus bypass surgery for coronary artery disease. Circulation 2002, 106, e187. [Google Scholar]
  14. L'Heureux, N.; Dusserre, N.; Konig, G.; Victor, B.; Keire, P.; Wight, T.N.; Chronos, N.A.F.; Kyles, A.E.; Gregory, C.R.; Hoyt, G.; Robbins, R.C.; McAllister, T.N. Human tissue-engineered blood vessels for adult arterial revascularization. Nat. Med. 2006, 12, 361–365. [Google Scholar]
  15. Faries, P.L.; LoGerfo, F.W.; Arora, S.; Hook, S.; Pulling, M.C.; Akbari, C.M.; Campbell, D.R.; Pomposelli, F.B. A comparative study of alternative conduits for lower extremity revascularization: All-autogenous conduit versus prosthetic grafts. J. Vasc. Surg. 2000, 32, 1080–1090. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kirklin, J.W.; Barratt-Bowers, B.G. Ventricular septal defect and pulmonary stenosis or atresia. In Cardiac Surgery; Churchill Livingstone: New York, NY, USA, 1993; pp. 861–1612. [Google Scholar]
  17. Pomposelli, J.F.B.; Arora, S.; Gibbons, G.W.; Frykberg, R.; Smakowski, P.; Campbell, D.R.; Freeman, D.V.; LoGerfo, F.W. Lower extremity arterial reconstruction in the very elderly: Successful outcome preserves not only the limb but also residential status and ambulatory function. J. Vasc. Surg. 1998, 28, 215–225. [Google Scholar]
  18. Yang, J.; Motlagh, D.; Webb, A.R.; Ameer, G.A. Novel biphasic elastomeric scaffold for small-diameter blood vessel tissue engineering. Tiss. Eng. 2005, 11, 1876–1886. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kapadia, M.R.; Popowich, D.A.; Kibbe, M.R. Modified prosthetic vascular conduits. Circulation 2008, 117, 1873–1882. [Google Scholar]
  20. Peterson, L.H.; Jensen, R.E.; Parnell, J. Mechanical properties of arteries in vivo. Circ. Res. 1960, 8, 622–639. [Google Scholar]
  21. Alvarado, J.; Murphy, C.; Juster, R. Age-related-changes in the basement-membrane of the human corneal epithelium. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1983, 24, 1015–1028. [Google Scholar]
  22. Candiello, J.; Balasubramani, M.; Schreiber, E.M.; Cole, G.J.; Mayer, U.; Halfter, W.; Lin, H. Biomechanical properties of native basement membranes. FEBS. J. 2007, 274, 2897–2908. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jacot, J.G.; Dianis, S.; Schnall, J.; Wong, J.Y. A simple microindentation technique for mapping the microscale compliance of soft hydrated materials and tissues. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2006, 79A, 485–494. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bayless, K.J.; Davis, G.E. Microtubule depolymerization rapidly collapses capillary tube networks in vitro and angiogenic vessels in vivo through the small GTPase rho. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 11686–11695. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hayashi, K.; Naiki, T. Adaptation and remodeling of the vascular wall; Biochemical response to hypertension. J. Mech. Beh. Biomed. Mater. 2008, 2, 3–19. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kasaj, A.; Reichert, C.; Gotz, H.; Rohrig, B.; Smeets, R.; Willerhausen, B. In vitro evaluation of various bioasbsorbable and nonresorbable barrier membranes for guided tissue regeneration. Head Face Med. 2008, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Abrams, G.A.; Goodman, S.L.; Nealey, P.F.; Franco, M.; Murphy, C.J. Nanoscale topography of the basement membrane underlying the corneal epithelium of the rhesus macaque. Cell Tissue Res. 2000, 299, 39–46. [Google Scholar]
  28. Liliensiek, S.J.; Nealey, P.; Murphy, C.J. Characterization of endothelial basement membrane nanotopography in rhesus macaque as a guide for vessel tissue engineering. Tiss. Eng. A 2009, 15, 2643–2651. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ausprunk, D.; Folkman, J. Migration and proliferation of endothelial cells in preformed and newly formed blood vessels during angiogenesis. Microvasc. Res. 1977, 14, 53–65. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ingber, D.E. Mechanical signaling and the cellular response to extracellular matrix in angiogenesis and cardiovascular physiology. Circ. Res. 2002, 91, 877–887. [Google Scholar]
  31. Deroanne, C.F.; Lapiere, C.M.; Nusgens, B.V. In vitro tubulogenesis of endothelial cells by relaxation of the coupling extracellular matrix-cytoskeleton. Cardiovasc. Res. 2001, 49, 647–658. [Google Scholar]
  32. Engler, A.; Bacakova, L.; Newman, C.; Hategan, A.; Griffin, M.; Discher, D. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys. J. 2004, 86, 617–628. [Google Scholar]
  33. Engler, A.J.; Griffin, M.A.; Sen, S.; Bonnemann, C.G.; Sweeney, H.L.; Discher, D.E. Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: Pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments. J. Cell Biol. 2004, 166, 877–887. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wong, G.A.; Tang, V.; El-Sabeawy, F.; Weiss, R.H. BMP-2 inhibits proliferation of human aortic smooth muscle cells via p21Cip1/Waf1. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003, 284, E972–E979. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gasiorowski, J.Z.; Russell, P.; Liliensiek, S.J.; Stephan, D.A.; Nealey, P.F.; Murphy, C.J. Comparison of Gene Expression Differences Between Endothelial Cells Grown on Flat and Nanopatterned Surfaces; In The American Society for Cell Biology's 47th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA, December 2007.
  36. Ferreira, L.S.; Gerecht, S.; Shieh, H.F.; Watson, N.; Rupnick, M.A.; Dallabrida, S.M.; Vunjak-Novakovic, G.; Langer, R. Vascular progenitor cells isolated from human embryonic stem cells give rise to endothelial and smooth muscle like cells and form vascular networks in vivo. Circ. Res. 2007, 101, 286–294. [Google Scholar]
  37. Cliff, W.J. Blood Vessels; Cambridge: New York, NY, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rhodin, J.A.G. Blood Vessel. In An Atlas of Ultrastructure; W B Suanders Co: Philedelphia, PA, USA, 1963; pp. 50–53. [Google Scholar]
  39. Simionescu, M. Implications of early structural-functional changes in the endothelium for vascular disease. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2007, 27, 266–274. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ingram, D.A.; Mead, L.E.; Tanaka, H.; Meade, V.; Fenoglio, A.; Mortell, K.; Pollok, K.; Ferkowicz, M.J.; Gilley, D.; Yoder, M.C. Identification of a novel hierarchy of endothelial progenitor cells using human peripheral and umbilical cord blood. Blood 2004, 104, 2752–2760. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yoder, M.C. Hemangioblasts: Of mice and men. Blood 2007, 109, 2667–2668. [Google Scholar]
  42. Mathur, A.B.; Collinsworth, A.M.; Reichert, W.M.; Kraus, W.E.; Truskey, G.A. Endothelial, cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle exhibit different viscous and elastic properties as determined by atomic force microscopy. J. Biomech. 2001, 34, 1545–1553. [Google Scholar]
  43. Cuerrier, C.M.; Gagner, A.; Lebel, R.; Gobeil, F., Jr.; Grandbois, M. Effect of thrombin and bradykinin on endothelial cell mechanical properties monitored through membrane deformation. J. Mol. Recognit. 2009, 22, 389–396. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hoang, M.V.; Whelan, M.C.; Senger, D.R. Rho activity critically and selectively regulates endothelial cell organization during angiogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 1874–1879. [Google Scholar]
  45. Silva, C.C.D.; Lamerant-Fayel, N.; Paprocka, M.; Mitterrand, M.; Gosset, D.; Dus, D.; Kieda, C. Selective human endothelial cell activation by chemikines as a guide to cell homing. Immunology 2008, 126, 394–404. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ribatti, D. The discovery of endothelial progenitor cells: An historical review. Leuk. Res. 2007, 31, 439–444. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kozulin, P.; Natoli, R.; O'Brian, K.M.B.; Madigan, M.C.; Provis, J.M. Differential expression of anti-angiogenic factors and guidance genes in teh developing macula. Mol. Vis. 2009, 15, 45–59. [Google Scholar]
  48. Chung, E.-S.; Saban, D.R.; Chauhan, S.K.; Dana, R. Regulation of blood vessel versus lymphatic vessel growth in the cornea. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009, 50, 1613–1618. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ling, S.; Qi, C.; Li, W.; Xu, J.; Kuang, W. The expression of vascular endothelial growth factor c in transplanted corneas. Curr. Eye Res. 2009, 34, 553–561. [Google Scholar]
  50. Fan, Y.; Gong, Y.; Ghosh, P.K.; Graham, L.M.; Fox, P.L. Spatial coordination of actin polymerization and ILK-Akt2 activity during endothelial cell migration. Dev. Cell 2009, 16, 661–674. [Google Scholar]
  51. Skarie, J.M.; Link, B.A. FoxC1 is essential for vascular basement membrane integrity and hyaloid vessel morphogenesis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hida, K.; Hida, Y.; Shindoh, M. Understanding tumor endothelial cell abnormalities to develop ideal anti-angiogenic therapies. Cancer Sci. 2008, 99, 459–466. [Google Scholar]
  53. Mendonça, R.J.; Maurício, V.B.; Teixeira, L.d.B.; Lachat, J.J.; Coutinho-Netto, J. Increased vascular permeability, angiogenesis and wound healing induced by the serum of natural latex of the rubber tree Hevea brasiliensis. Phytother. Res. 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rae, M.; Mohamad, A.; Price, D.; Hadoke, P.W.F.; Walker, B.R.; Mason, J.I.; Hillier, S.G.; Critchley, H.O.D. Cortisol inactivation by 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-2 may enhance endometrial angiogenesis via reduced thrombospondin-1 in heavy menstruation. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 94, 1443–1450. [Google Scholar]
  55. Kniazeva, E.; Putnam, A.J. Endothelial cell traction and ECM density influence both capillary morphogenesis and maintenance in 3-D. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2009, 297, C179–C187. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ohashi, T.; Ishii, Y.; Ishikawa, Y.; Matsumoto, T.; Sato, M. Experimental and numerical analyses of local mechanical properties measured by atomic force microscopy for sheared endothelial cells. Biomed. Mat. Eng. 2002, 12, 319–327. [Google Scholar]
  57. Lu, L.; Oswald, S.J.; Ngu, H.; Yin, F.C.P. Mechanical properties of actin stress fibers in living cells. Biophys. J. 2008, 95, 6060–6071. [Google Scholar]
  58. Satcher, R.; Jr, C.F.D.; Hartwig, J.H. Mechanical remodeling of the endothelial surface and actin cytoskeleton induced by fluid flow. Microcirculation 1997, 4, 439–453. [Google Scholar]
  59. Hochmuth, R.M. Micropipette aspiration of living cells. J. Biomech. 2000, 33, 15–22. [Google Scholar]
  60. Hanjaya-Putra, D.; Gerecht, S. Vascular engineering using human embryonic stem cells. Biotechnol. Prog. 2009, 25, 2–9. [Google Scholar]
  61. Alamo, J.C.d.; Norwich, G.N.; Li, Y.-s.J.; Lasheras, J.C.; Chien, S. Anisotropic rheology and directional mechanotransduction in vascular endotheilial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 15411–15416. [Google Scholar]
  62. Pesen, D.; Hoh, J.H. Micromechanical architecture of the endothelial cell cortex. Biophys. J. 2005, 88, 670–679. [Google Scholar]
  63. Mathur, A.B.; Truskey, G.A.; Reichert, W.M. Atomic force and total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy for the study of force transmission in endothelial cells. Biophys. J. 2000, 78, 1725–1735. [Google Scholar]
  64. Oberleithner, H.; Riethmuller, C.; Ludwig, T.; Shahin, V.; Stock, C.; Schwab, A.; Hausberg, M.; Kusche, K.; Schillers, H. Differential action of steroid hormones on human endothelium. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119, 1926–1932. [Google Scholar]
  65. Chouinard, J.A.; Grenier, G.; Khalil, A.; Vermette, P. Oxidized-LDL induce morphological changes and increas stiffness of endothelial cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2008, 314, 3007–3016. [Google Scholar]
  66. Sinionescu, M.; Antohe, F. Functional Unstructure of the Vascular Endothelium: Changes in Various Pathologies. In Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology; Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; Volume 176, pp. 41–69. [Google Scholar]
  67. Campbell, G.R.; Chamleycampbell, J.H. Smooth-muscle phenotypic modulation—Role in atherogenesis. Med. Hypotheses 1981, 7, 729–735. [Google Scholar]
  68. Kataoka, N.; Iwaki, K.; Hashimoto, K.; Mochizuki, S.; Ogasawara, Y.; Sato, M.; Tsujioka, K.; Kajiya, F. Measurements of endothelial cell-to-cell and cell-to-substrate gaps and micromechanical propeties of endothelial cells during moncyte adhesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 15638–15643. [Google Scholar]
  69. Hayashi, K. Experimental approaches on measuring the mechanical properties and constitutive laws of arterial walls. J. Biomed. Eng. 1993, 115, 481–488. [Google Scholar]
  70. Hillebrand, U.; Hausber, M.; Stock, C.; Shahin, V.; Nikova, D.; Riethmuller, C.; Kliche, K.; Ludwig, T.; Schillers, H.; Schneider, S.W.; Oberleithmer, H. 17B-estradiol increases volume, apical surface and elasticity of human endothelium mediated by Na+/H+ exchange. Cardiovasc. Res. 2006, 69, 916–924. [Google Scholar]
  71. Hirschi, K.K.; Ingram, D.A.; Yoder, M.C. Assessing identity, phenotype, and fate of endothelial progenitor cells. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2008, 28, 1584–1595. [Google Scholar]
  72. Xu, Q. Stem cell and transplant arteriosclerosis. Circ. Res. 2008, 102, 1011–1024. [Google Scholar]
  73. Dunn, P.F.; Newman, K.D.; Jones, M.; Yamada, I.; Shayani, V.; Virmani, R.; Dichek, D.A. Seeding of vascular grafts with genetically modified endothelial cells : Secretion of recombinant TPA results in decreased seeded cell retention in vitro and in vivo. Circulation 1996, 93, 1439–1446. [Google Scholar]
  74. Discher, D.E.; Janmey, P.; Wang, Y.L. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 2005, 310, 1139–1143. [Google Scholar]
  75. Last, J.A.; Liliensiek, S.J.; Nealey, P.F.; Murphy, C.J. Determining the mechanical properties of human corneal basement membranes with atomic force microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 2009, 167, 19–24. [Google Scholar]
  76. Abrams, G.A.; Teixeira, A.I.; Nealey, P.F.; Murphy, C.J. Effects of Substratum Topography on Cell Behavior. In Biomimetic Materials and Design: Biointerfacial Strategies, Tissue Engineering and Targeted Drug Delivery; Dillow, A.K., Lowman, A.M., Eds.; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 91–137. [Google Scholar]
  77. LeBleu, V.S.; MacDonald, B.; Kalluri, R. Structure and function of basement membranes. Exp. Biol. Med. 2007, 232, 1121–1129. [Google Scholar]
  78. Brody, S.; Anilkumar, T.; Liliensiek, S.; Last, J.A.; Murphy, C.J.; Pandit, A. Characterizing nanoscale topography of the aortic heart valve basement membrane for tissue engineering heart valve scaffold design. Tissue Eng. 2006, 12, 413–421. [Google Scholar]
  79. Timpl, R. Macromolecular organization of basement membranes. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1996, 8, 618–624. [Google Scholar]
  80. Kolega, J.; Manabe, M.; Sun, T.-T. Basement membrane heterogeneity and variation in corneal epithelial differentiation. Differentiation 1989, 42, 54–63. [Google Scholar]
  81. Ekblom, P.; Timpl, R. Cell-to-cell contact and extracellular matrix A multifaceted approach emerging. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1996, 8, 599–601. [Google Scholar]
  82. Merker, H.-J. Morphology of the basement membrane. Microsc. Res. Tech. 1994, 28, 95–124. [Google Scholar]
  83. Yurchenco, P.D.; O'Rear, J. Supramolecular organization of basment membranes. In Molecular and Cellular Aspects of Basment Membranes; Rohrbach, D.H., Timpl, R., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1993; pp. 19–47. [Google Scholar]
  84. Simionescu, M.; Antohe, F. Functional Unstructure of the Vascular Endothelium: Changes in Various Pathologies. In Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology; Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; Volume 176, pp. 41–69. [Google Scholar]
  85. Rhodin, J.A.G. Cardiovascular System. In Histology: A Text and Atlas; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1977; pp. 331–370. [Google Scholar]
  86. Saux, O.L.; Teeters, K.; Miyasato, S.; Choi, J.; Nakamatsu, G.; Richardson, J.A.; Starcher, B.; Davis, E.C.; Tam, E.K.; Saux, C.J.-L. The role of caveolin-1 in pulmonary matrix remodeling and mechanical properties. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2008, 295, L1007–L1017. [Google Scholar]
  87. Godier, A.F.; Marolt, D.; Gerecht, S.; Tajnsek, U.; Martens, T.P.; Vunjak-Novakovic, G. Engineered microenvironments for human stem cells. Birth Defects Res. C, Embryo Today 2008, 84, 335–347. [Google Scholar]
  88. Figallo, E.; Cannizzaro, C.; Gerecht, S.; Burdick, J.A.; Langer, R.; Elvassore, N.; Vunjak-Novakovic, G. Micro-bioreactor array for controlling cellular microenvironments. Lab Chip 2007, 7, 710–719. [Google Scholar]
  89. Chan, F.L.; Inoue, S. Lamina lucida of basement membrane: An artefact. Microsc. Res. Tech. 1994, 28, 48–59. [Google Scholar]
  90. Ghadially, F.N. Cell Membrane and Coat. In Ultrastructural Pathology of the Cell and Matrix; Butterworth-Heinemann: Boston, MA, USA, 1997; Volume 2, pp. 1124–1158. [Google Scholar]
  91. Tanner, G.A.; Evan, A.P.; Williams, J.C. Reply to miner. Am. J. Renal Physiol. 2009, 297, F551. [Google Scholar]
  92. Mobjerg, N.; Jespersen, A.; Wilkinson, M. Morphology of the kidney in the west african caecilian, geotrypetes seraphini (Amphibia, Gymnophiona, Caeciliidae). J. Morphol. 2004, 262, 583–607. [Google Scholar]
  93. Ridley, A.J.; Hall, A. The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors. Cell 1992, 70, 389–399. [Google Scholar]
  94. Bentley, E.; Murphy, C.J. Topical therapeutic agents that modulate corneal wound healing. Vet Clin. North Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2004, 34, 623–638. [Google Scholar]
  95. Davis, G.E.; Senger, D.R. Endothelial extracellular matrix: Biosynthesis, remodeling, and functions during vascular morphogenesis and neovessel stabilization. Circ. Res. 2005, 97, 1093–1107. [Google Scholar]
  96. Abrams, G.A.; Schaus, S.S.; Goodman, S.L.; Nealey, P.F.; Murphy, C.J. Nanoscale topography of the corneal epithelial basment membrane and descemet's membrane of the human. Cornea 2000, 19, 57–64. [Google Scholar]
  97. Ebenstein, D.M.; Pruitt, L.A. Nanoindentation of soft hydrated materials of application to vascular tissues. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2004, 69A, 222–232. [Google Scholar]
  98. Oie, T.; Murayama, Y.; Fukuda, T.; Nagai, C.; Omata, S.; Kanda, K.; Yaku, H.; Nakayama, Y. Local elasticity imaging of vascular tissues using a tactile mapping system. J. Artif. Organs 2009, 12, 40–46. [Google Scholar]
  99. Lundkvist, A.; Lilleodden, E.; Siekhaus, W.; Kinney, J.; Pruitt, L.; Balooch, M. Viscoelastic Proerties of Healthy Human Artery Measured in Saline Solution by Afm-Based Indentation Technique. In Thin Films: Stresses and Mechnical Properties VI; Gerberich, W.W., Gao, H., Sundgren, J.E., Baker, S.P., Eds.; Materials Research Society: Pittsburg, PA, USA, 1997; Volume 436, pp. 353–357. [Google Scholar]
  100. Engler, A.J.; Richert, L.; Wong, J.Y.; Picart, C.; Discher, D.E. Surface probe measurements of the elasticity of sectioned tissue, thin gels and polyelectrolyte multilayer films: Correlations between substrate stiffness and cell adhesion. Surf. Sci. 2004, 570, 142–154. [Google Scholar]
  101. Form, D.M.; Pratt, B.M.; Madri, J.A. Endothelial cell proliferation duirng angiogenesis. Lab Invest. 1986, 55, 521–530. [Google Scholar]
  102. Iivanainen, E.; Kähäri, V.-M.; Heino, J.; Elenius, K. Endothelial cell-Matrix interactions. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2003, 60, 13–22. [Google Scholar]
  103. Soofi, S.S.; Last, J.A.; Liliensiek, S.J.; Nealey, P.F.; Murphy, C.J. The elastic modulus of Matrigel(TM) as determined by atomic force microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 2009, 167, 216–219. [Google Scholar]
  104. Zhang, X.; Wang, X.; Keshav, V.; Wang, X.; Johanas, J.T.; Leisk, G.G.; Kaplan, D.L. Dynamic culture conditions to generate silk-based tissue-engineered vascular grafts. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 3213–3223. [Google Scholar]
  105. Tsai, S.-H.; Liu, Y.-W.; Tang, W.-C.; Zhou, Z.-W.; Hwang, C.-Y.; Hwang, G.-Y.; Ou, B.-R.; Hu, C.-P.; Yang, V.C.; Chen, J.-K. Characterization of porcine arterial endothelial cells cultured on amniotic membrane, a potential matrix for vascular tissue engineering. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 357, 984–990. [Google Scholar]
  106. Plant, A.L.; Bhadriraju, K.; Spurlin, T.A.; Elliot, J.T. Cell response to matix mechanics: Focus on collagen. Bioch. Biophy. Acta 2009, 1793, 893–902. [Google Scholar]
  107. Liu, Y.; Vrana, N.E.; Cahill, P.A.; McGuinness, G.B. Physically crosslinked composite hydrogels of PVA with natural macromolecules: Structure, mechanical properties, and endothelial cell compatability. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B 2009, 90, 492–502. [Google Scholar]
  108. Abrams, G.A.; Bentley, E.; Nealey, P.F.; Murphy, C.J. Electron microscopy of the canine corneal basement membranes. Cells Tissues Organs 2002, 170, 251–257. [Google Scholar]
  109. Abrams, G.A.; Murphy, C.J.; Wang, Z.Y.; Nealey, P.F.; Bjorling, D.E. Ultrastructural basement membrane topography of the bladder epithelium. Urol. Res. 2003, 31, 341–346. [Google Scholar]
  110. Biela, S.A.; Su, Y.; Spatz, J.P.; Kemkemer, R. Different sensitivity of human endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts to topography in the nano-micro range. Acta Biomater. 2009, 5, 2460–2466. [Google Scholar]
  111. Uttayarat, P.; Chen, M.; Li, M.; Allen, F.D.; Composto, R.J.; Lelkes, P.I. Microtopography and flow modulate the direction of endothelial cell migration. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2008, 294, H1027–H1035. [Google Scholar]
  112. Barbucci, R.; Lamponi, S.; Magnani, A.; Pasqui, D. Micropatterned surfaces for the control of endothelial cell behaviour. Biomol. Eng. 2002, 19, 161–170. [Google Scholar]
  113. Lin, X.; Helmke, B.P. Micropatterned structural control suppresses mechanotaxis of endothelial cells. Biphys. J. 2008, 95, 3066–3078. [Google Scholar]
  114. Flemming, R.G.; Murphy, C.J.; Abrams, G.A.; Goodman, S.L.; Nealey, P.F. Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. Biomaterials 1999, 20, 573–588. [Google Scholar]
  115. Karuri, N.W.; Porri, T.J.; Albrecht, R.M.; Murphy, C.J.; Nealey, P.F. Nano- and microscale holes modulate cell-substrate adhesion, cytoskeletal organization, and -beta1 integrin localization in SV40 human corneal epithelial cells. IEEE Trans. Nanobioscience. 2006, 5, 273–280. [Google Scholar]
  116. Teixeira, A.I.; Nealey, P.F.; Murphy, C.J. Responses of human keratocytes to micro- and nanostructured substrates. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2004, 71, 369–376. [Google Scholar]
  117. Haydarkhan-Hagvall, S.; Choi, C.-H.; Dunn, H.; Heydarkhan, S.; Schenke-Layland, K.; Maclellan, W.R.; Beygui, R.E. Influence of systemically varied nano-scale topography on cell morphology and adhesion. Cell Commun. Adhes. 2007, 14, 181–194. [Google Scholar]
  118. Bettinger, C.J.; Langer, R.; Borenstein, J.T. Engineering substrate topography at the micro- and nanoscale to control cell function. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5406–5415. [Google Scholar]
  119. Cavalcanti-Adam, E.A.; Aydin, D.; Hischfield-Warneken, V.C.; Spatz, J.P. Cell adhesion and response to synthetic nanopatterned environments by steering receptor clustering and spatial location. HFSP J. 2008, 2, 276–295. [Google Scholar]
  120. Chai, C.; Leong, K.W. Biomaterials approach to expang and direct differentiation of stem cells. Mol. Ther. 2007, 15, 467–480. [Google Scholar]
  121. Yim, E.K.; Pang, S.W.; Leong, K.W. Synthetic nanostructures inducing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cell into neuronal lineage. Exp. Cell Res. 2007, 313, 1820–1829. [Google Scholar]
  122. Foley, J.D.; Grunwald, E.W.; Nealey, P.F.; Murphy, C.J. Cooperative modulation of neuritogenesis by PC12 cells by topography and nerve growth factor. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 3639–3644. [Google Scholar]
  123. Tajima, S.; Chu, J.S.F.; Li, S.; Komvopoulos, K. Differential regulation of endothelial cell adhesion, spreading, and cytoskeleton on low-density polyethylene by nanotopography and surface chemistry modification induced by argon plasma treatment. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2008, 84A, 828–836. [Google Scholar]
  124. Samaroo, H.D.; Lu, J.; Webster, T.J. Enhanced endothelial cell density on NiTi surfaces with sub-micron to nanometer roughness. Int. J. Nanomed. 2008, 3, 75–82. [Google Scholar]
  125. Khang, D.; Lu, J.; Yao, C.; Haberstroh, K.M.; Webster, T.J. The role of nanometer and sub-micron surface features on vascular and bone cell adhesion on titanium. Biomaterials 2008, 29, 970–983. [Google Scholar]
  126. Chung, T.-W.; Liu, D.-Z.; Wang, S.-Y.; Wang, S.-S. Enhancement of the growth of human endothelial cells by surface roughness at nanometer scale. Biomaterials 2003, 24, 4655–4661. [Google Scholar]
  127. Foley, J.D.; Grunwald, E.W.; Nealey, P.F.; Murphy, C.J. Cooperative modulation of neuritogenesis by PC12 cells by topography and nerve growth factor. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 3639–3644. [Google Scholar]
  128. Karuri, N.W.; Liliensiek, S.; Teixeira, A.I.; Abrams, G.; Campbell, S.; Nealey, P.F.; Murphy, C.J. Biological length scale topography enhances cell-substratum adhesion of human corneal epithelial cells. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117, 3153–3164. [Google Scholar]
  129. Bettinger, C.J.; Zhang, Z.; Gerecht, S.; Borenstein, J.T.; Langer, R. Enhancement of in vitro capillary tube formation by substrate nanotopography. Adv. Mater. Deerfield 2008, 20, 99–103. [Google Scholar]
  130. Diehl, K.A.; Foley, J.D.; Nealey, P.F.; Murphy, C.J. Nanoscale topography modulates corneal epithelial cell migration. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2005, 75, 603–611. [Google Scholar]
  131. Liliensiek, S.J.; Campbell, S.; Nealey, P.F.; Murphy, C.J. The scale of substratum topographic features modulates proliferation of corneal epithelial cells and corneal fibroblasts. J Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2006, 79, 185–192. [Google Scholar]
  132. Teixeira, A.I.; McKie, G.A.; Foley, J.D.; Bertics, P.J.; Nealey, P.F.; Murphy, C.J. The effect of environmental factors on the response of human corneal epithelial cells to nanoscale substrate topography. Biomaterials 2006, 27, 3945–3954. [Google Scholar]
  133. Silva, T.S.N.; Machado, D.C.; Viezzer, C.; Jr, A.N.S.; Oliveira, M.G.d. Effect of titanium surface roughness on human bone marrow cell proliferation and differentiation. An experimental study. Acta Cir. Bra. 2009, 24, 200–205. [Google Scholar]
  134. Brammer, K.; Oh, S.; Gallagher, J.; Jin, S. Enhanced cellular mobility guided by TiO2 nantube surfaces. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 786–793. [Google Scholar]
  135. Park, J.; Bauer, S.; Schlegel, K.A.; Neukam, F.W.; Mark, K.v.d.; Schmuki, P. TiO2 Nanotube surfaces: 15nm—An optima length scale of surface topography for cell adhesion and differentiation. Small 2009, 5, 666–671. [Google Scholar]
  136. Szivek, J.A.; Margolis, D.S.; Schnepp, A.B.; Grana, W.A.; William, S.K. Selective cell proliferation can be controlled with CPC paritcle coatings. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2007, 81, 939–947. [Google Scholar]
  137. Stankus, J.J.; Soletti, L.; Fujimoto, K.; Hong, Y.; Vorp, D.A.; Wagner, W.R. Fabrication of cell microintegrated blood vessel constructs through electrohydrodynamic atomization. Biomaterials 2007, 28, 2738–2746. [Google Scholar]
  138. Teixeira, A.I.; Abrams, G.A.; Murphy, C.J.; Nealey, P.F. Cell behavior on lithographically defined nanostructured substrates. J.Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2003, 21, 683–687. [Google Scholar]
  139. Teixeira, A.I.; Abrams, G.A.; Bertics, P.J.; Murphy, C.J.; Nealey, P.F. Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates. J. Cell Sci. 2003, 116, 1881–1892. [Google Scholar]
  140. Ebenstein, D.M.; Pruitz, L.A. Nonoindentation fo biological materials. Nanotoday 2006, 1, 26–33. [Google Scholar]
  141. Cao, Y.; Ma, D.; Raabe, D. The use of flat punch indentation to determine the viscoelastic properties in the time and frequency domains of soft layer bonded to a rigid substrate. Acta Biomater. 2009, 5, 240–248. [Google Scholar]
  142. Dahl, S.L.M.; Rhim, C.; Song, Y.C.; Niklason, L.E. Mechanical properties and compositions of tissue engineered and native arteries. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2007, 35, 348–355. [Google Scholar]
  143. Brown, X.Q.; Ookawa, K.; Wong, J.Y. Evaluation of polydimethylsiloxane scaffolds with physiologically-relevant elastic moduli: interplay of substrate mechanics and surface chemistry effects on vascular smooth muscle cell response. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 3123–3129. [Google Scholar]
  144. Lee, J.C.; Discher, D.E. Deformation-enhanced fluctuations in the red cell skeleton with theoretical relations to elasticity, connectivity, and spectrin unfolding. Biophys. J. 2001, 81, 3178–3192. [Google Scholar]
  145. Ra, H.J.; Picart, C.; Feng, H.; Sweeney, H.L.; Discher, D.E. Muscle cell peeling from micropatterned collagen: Direct probing of focal and molecular properties of matrix adhesion. J. Cell Sci. 1999, 112, 1425–1436. [Google Scholar]
  146. Engler, A.; Bacakova, L.; Newman, C.; Sheehan, M.; Discher, D. Mechanical role of cytoskeletal components in vascular smoothmuscle cell adhesion in vitro. In Proceedings of the IEEE 28th Annual Northeast, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 20–21 April 2002; pp. 23–24.
  147. Engler, A.J.; Sen, S.; Sweeney, H.L.; Discher, D.E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126, 677–689. [Google Scholar]
  148. Ghajar, C.M.; Chen, X.; Harris, J.W.; Suresh, V.; Hughes, C.C.W.; Jeon, N.L.; Putnam, A.J.; George, S.C. The effect of matrix density on the regulation of 3-D capillary morphogenesis. Biophys. J. 2008, 94, 1930–1941. [Google Scholar]
  149. Griffith, L.G.; Swartz, M.A. Capturing complex 3D tissue physiology in vitry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7, 211–223. [Google Scholar]
  150. Shin, H.; Zygourakis, K.; Farach-Carson, M.C.; Yaszemski, M.J.; Mikos, A.G. Modulation of differentiation and mineralization of marrow stromal cells cultured on biomimetic hydrogels modified with Arg-Gly-Asp containing peptides. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2004, 69, 535–543. [Google Scholar]
  151. Kasper, G.; Dankert, N.; Tuischer, J.; Hoeft, M.; Gaber, T.; Glaeser, J.D.; Zander, D.; Tschirschmann, M.; Thompson, M.; Matziolis, G.; Duda, G.N. Mesenchymal stem cells regulate angiogenesis according to their mechanical environment. Stem Cells 2007, 25, 903–910. [Google Scholar]
  152. Ghajar, C.M.; Blevins, K.S.; Hughes, C.C.W.; George, S.C.; Putnam, A.J. Mesenchymal stem cells enhance angiogenesis in mechanically viable prevascularized tissues via early matrix metalloproteinase upregulation. Tissue Eng. 2006, 12, 2875–2888. [Google Scholar]
  153. Peetla, C.; Labhasetwar, V. Biophysical characterization of nanoparticles-endothelial model of cell membrane interactions. Mol. Pharm. 2008, 5, 418–429. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wood, J.A.; Liliensiek, S.J.; Russell, P.; Nealey, P.F.; Murphy, C.J. Biophysical Cueing and Vascular Endothelial Cell Behavior. Materials 2010, 3, 1620-1639. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3031620

AMA Style

Wood JA, Liliensiek SJ, Russell P, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. Biophysical Cueing and Vascular Endothelial Cell Behavior. Materials. 2010; 3(3):1620-1639. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3031620

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wood, Joshua A., Sara J. Liliensiek, Paul Russell, Paul F. Nealey, and Christopher J. Murphy. 2010. "Biophysical Cueing and Vascular Endothelial Cell Behavior" Materials 3, no. 3: 1620-1639. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3031620

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop