Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Characterization of Superconducting Ca1xNaxFFeAs
Previous Article in Journal
In vitro and in vivo Biocompatibility of Alginate Dialdehyde/Gelatin Hydrogels with and without Nanoscaled Bioactive Glass for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

All-Carbon Electrode Consisting of Carbon Nanotubes on Graphite Foil for Flexible Electrochemical Applications

1
Department of Biomedical Engineering and Healthcare Industry Research Institute, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 130-701, Korea
2
Department of Information Display and Advanced Display Research Center, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 130-701, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2014, 7(3), 1975-1983; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7031975
Submission received: 27 January 2014 / Revised: 28 February 2014 / Accepted: 3 March 2014 / Published: 7 March 2014
(This article belongs to the Section Biomaterials)

Abstract

: We demonstrate the fabrication of an all-carbon electrode by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition for use in flexible electrochemical applications. The electrode is composed of vertically aligned carbon nanotubes that are grown directly on a flexible graphite foil. Being all-carbon, the simple fabrication process and the excellent electrochemical characteristics present an approach through which high-performance, highly-stable and cost-effective electrochemical applications can be achieved.

1. Introduction

Due to its ability to graphitize, and its presence in different types of powders, fibers, fabrics and other composites, carbon represents a very attractive material for electrochemical applications [1,2], especially biosensors and energy storage devices [3,4]. Carbon electrodes can offer various potential advantages compared to conventional electrodes such as platinum or gold. Being feasible to customized systems, they can be fabricated with great suppleness in various forms and dimensions [4].

Among carbon materials, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have outstanding properties such as excellent electrical and thermal conductivity, and large surface area. They are attractive candidates for not only electrodes in electrochemical devices but also other applications such as wiring [5], heat dissipation [6], and field electron emitters [7]. Another interesting carbon material, graphite, has useful characteristics such as a relatively simple fabrication process, cost effectiveness and mechanical flexibility due to the sheet-like hexagonal lattice arrangement of its carbon atoms [8].

For proper functionality, regular electrochemical devices rely on electrodes with high effective surface area [9]. The combination of CNTs and graphite produces hybrid electrodes with superior characteristics of both materials. Compared to other electrodes, such superior characteristics will include a larger surface area as well as mechanical flexibility, higher sensitivity and significantly lighter weight. To achieve the large surface area, an optimized growth of vertically aligned CNTs is a key parameter. The advantage of vertically aligned CNTs over random CNTs such as the spaghetti-like structured CNTs [10], is that the number of vertically aligned CNTs that can be packed per unit area of the substrate—with access to the conductive surface area of the CNTs—is substantially large. Hence, several chemical vapor deposition methods have been developed to grow aligned multi-walled CNT and single-walled CNT forests, but, it is very difficult to directly grow the vertically aligned CNT on a flexible carbon substrate [11,12].

In this work, we developed a new conducting and flexible, all-carbon electrode consisting of CNTs on graphite foil with nano-scaled carbon structures for use in highly sensitive electrochemical devices. The study provides information on the growth mechanisms of the CNTs on a graphite substrate, including their ensemble structures. It reveals the nanostructures of the CNTs and their measured electrochemical and mechanical properties.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Preparation of All-Carbon Electrode

The fabrication of the flexible all-carbon electrode is depicted in Figure 1 Initially, a nickel catalyst film with 60-nm thickness was deposited on a 0.125-mm-thick graphite foil (Good fellow Corp., Coraopolis, PA, USA) by radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering using a nickel target of purity 99.9999% and 4-inches in diameter (Figure 1a). The graphite sample was positioned 10 cm above the target during sputtering. The seeding process was then initiated by forming at 600 °C for 30 min. The forming process induces the agglomeration of the Ni catalysts (Figure 1b).

The sample was then transferred to a plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) system with a mesh grid placed 10 mm above the substrate holder for the growth of vertical CNTs [7]. The substrate electrode was maintained at −600 V with the top electrode grounded, and the spacing between the two electrodes was 20 mm in a triode-PECVD system. Acetylene (C2H2) and ammonia (NH3) gases were used for the CNT growth, with the C2H2:NH3 flow-rate ratio fixed at 40:60. The total gas pressure during growth was maintained at 2 Torr and the CNT growth time was 20 min. The growth temperature was maintained at 700 °C. The electric field direction during growth may provide the direction for the nanotube axes and the nanotube diameter can be controlled to a large extent by preparing catalyst particles of appropriate diameter (Figure 1c) [13]. The triode-PECVD system until now has been shown to produce aligned nanotubes, and can also be used to produce individual freestanding nanotubes, resulting in electrodes with a large surface area [14]. From the flexibility tests that were performed, the all-carbon electrode was found to be bendable (Figure 1d) and non-breakable. Three samples were processed in the triode-PECVD system for 3, 5 and 7 min in order to investigate the growth mechanism of the CNTs [15,16].

2.2. Electron Microscopy

Characterization of individual CNTs and catalysts at various growth stages, including high-resolution transmission electron microscope (TEM) imaging and scanning electron microscope imaging (SEM) was conducted using a FEI Tecnai F-30 (S) TEM with a field-emission electron gun operated at 300 keV and the Hitachi S-4700 high-resolution scanning electron microscope, respectively. For investigating microscopic interface between CNTs and graphite substrate, samples were prepared using a focused ion beam (FIB) (Quanta 3D FEG, FEI Company).

2.3. Electrochemical Measurements

Cyclic voltammetry (CV) experiments were performed using a PARSTAT 2263 advanced electrochemical analyzer (Princeton Applied Research, Oak Ridge, TN, USA) running Power CV software (Princeton Applied Research). All experiments were carried out by a three-electrode system with all-carbon electrodes as the working electrode, a platinum wire as the counter electrode, and an Ag/AgCl electrode as the reference electrode in DI water with the addition of 0.1 M potassium chloride (KCl) containing 1.0 mM potassium hexacyanoferrate(III) (K3Fe(CN)6, ACS reagent, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The CV measurement were recorded within a potential range from −0.1 to +0.5 V vs. Ag/AgCl.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Growth Mechanism of Carbon Electrode

A schematic illustration of the CNT growth on graphite foil is depicted in Figure 2. The surface of the graphite foil is not uniform but rather composed of stacked graphene layers (Figure 2a). The forming process at 600 °C for 30 min aggregates the Ni to form seed metals on the graphite foil (Figure 2b). The diameters of the seeds is 100~170 nm (average diameter: 140 nm). After 3 min into the growth process, burgeon-like structures of CNTs become visible (Figure 2c). The CNTs become further aligned with increasing growth time (Figure 2d). The CNTs took about 10 min to become vertically aligned (Figure 2e) [13].

3.2. Structural Properties of All-Carbon Electrode

The all-carbon electrode demonstrated outstanding structural suppleness during mechanical bending. It could be bent to a radius of 1.5 cm without any visible cracks (Figure S1). The CNTs exhibit a very uniform forest-morphology (Figure 3a), which is one of the requirements for device applications. After growth, the CNTs are vertically aligned and approximately 3 μm in length. The diameter of the CNTs is 100 nm (Figure 3b). We can grow various nanostructures with nanofiber to nanotube diameters by controlling the thickness of the catalyst layer [17]. In this research, despite the large thickness of the CNTs, we can see a multilayered and hole structures from TEM images (See supplementary materials Figure S2). Uniform alignment leads to small sized substrates with larger surface areas. The result is outstanding electron transfer supporting capacity when used as electrodes in electrochemical reactions.

The strong physical bond between the CNTs and the graphite substrate enables the structures to withstand mechanical stress during bending, making those applicable to flexible and non-breakable applications. The structure of the graphite foil is porous (Figure 4), which contributes to the flexibility of the graphite foil. As shown Figure 4b, the magnified substrate (Figure 4a) can see the crystalline graphite structure. The bond between the graphite substrate and CNTs is strong enough to withstand any mechanical stress. Although external force was used to detach the few CNTs from the sample for TEM analysis, the graphite is still firmly attached to the CNTs (Figure 4a) [18].

3.3. Flexibility Test

To quantitatively evaluate the influence of rolling on the electrical conductivity, the electrical resistances of the all-carbon electrode were measured under continuous rolling cycles, using a 6 × 6 cm2 flexible all-carbon substrate. The radius of curvature is 6 mm. Details of the rolling method can be found in the Figure S3 of supplementary materials.

To investigate the reliability of the substrate, the morphology of the all-carbon electrode was traced with increasing number of rolling cycles and the results are summarized in Figure 5a–c. Regardless of the increasing bending stress, there is no cracking or peeling off of the CNTs from the graphite foil.

3.4. Electrochemical Characterization

To characterize the electrochemical behavior of all-carbon electrode after bending stress, we performed the CV measurements using standard electroactive reagent such as K3Fe(CN)6.

Figure 6a,b represents the cyclic voltammograms of the graphite foil and all-carbon electrode after 250th rolling cycles in 1.0 mM K3Fe(CN)6 in DI water with addition of 0.1 M KCl at potential scan rates ranging from 10 to 200 mV/s. The corresponding peak current’s dependence on the square root of the scan rate is shown in Figure 6c,d. The anodic and the cathodic peak currents in both graphite foil and all-carbon electrode after 250th bending increased linearly with the square root of the scan rates (correlation coefficients of 0.9986 (anodic peak) and 0.9930 (cathodic peak) in graphite foil, and of 0.9980 (anodic peak) and 0.9971 (cathodic peak) in all-carbon electrode, respectively). The linear relationships indicate that the electrochemical kinetics reaction of both electrodes is diffusion-controlled [3]. However, the cyclic voltammograms of all-carbon electrode represented sharper and stronger peaks with a smaller peak separation than that of graphite foil. Potential separation of Fe(CN)63–/4– redox couple at a scan rate of 10 mV/s and the corresponding slopes of peak current vs. square root of scan rate are summarized in Table 1.

The potential separation (ΔEp) in all-carbon electrode between anodic peak potential (Epa) and cathodic peak potential (Epc) at 10 mV/s was 66.07 mV, which was more closer to the theoretical value of 57 mV for the reversible one-electron-transfer reaction at 25 °C than that of graphite foil (259.45 mV) [19]. Therefore, it suggests that the all-carbon electrode has better electrochemical reversibility than a graphite foil, indicating faster electron transfer capabilities at the electrode surface. Besides, the slope of the straight line of Ipa vs. v1/2 is 7.06 and 1.36 μA·mV–1/2·s1/2 in the all-carbon electrode and graphite foil, respectively. The slope of the Ipc vs. v1/2 is −8.10 and −2.67 μA·mV−1/2·s1/2 in the all-carbon electrode and graphite foil, respectively. Comparing the slopes of the curves, the kinetics of the electron transfer at the all-carbon electrode was improved, for both anodic and cathodic processes. It may be attributed to a larger surface area of the all-carbon electrode. Also, there is no influence of the all-carbon electrode with 250 and no rolling cycles (See supplementary materials Figure S4).

The calculated electroactive area of the all-carbon electrode was determined using the Randles-Sevcik equation for quasi-reversible electron transfer processes:

I p = ( 2.65 × 10 5 ) n 3 2 A C D 1 2 v 1 2

where n is the number of electrons participating in the redox process, A is the working electrode area (cm2), D is the diffusion coefficient (7.64 × 10−6 cm2·s−1 at 25 °C), C is the concentration of the probe molecule (1 × 10−6 mol·cm−3) and ν is the scan rate (V·s−1). From Equation (1), the electroactive area of the all-carbon electrode was 0.205 cm2, which was larger than that of graphite foil (0.067 cm2). Therefore, the excellent electrocatalytic performance of the all-carbon electrode can be attributed to the highly effective surface, which consists of large conducting regions.

4. Conclusions

An all-carbon electrode for use in electrochemical devices has been fabricated and investigated. The all-carbon electrode, consisting of CNTs grown directly on a flexible graphite foil, demonstrated a very large electrochemical active surface area and high electrocatalytic activity. Mechanical flexibility was confirmed, and the electrode exhibited reliable adhesion properties between the CNTs and graphite foil. The all-carbon electrode holds the promise of creating highly-stable, high performance, and cost-effective flexible electrochemical applications.

Supplementary Information

materials-07-01975-s001.pdf

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the industrial strategic technology development program funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (Grant No. 10037379).

Author Contributions

J. Ryu designed and conducted the core experiments and wrote the draft of the manuscript, G. Lee analysis electrochemical properties by W. Kim’s measured data, H. Lim characterized the samples by SEM, M. Mallory tested rolling characteristic and Park supervised the complete research. All authors contributed to the analysis for results and conclusions and revised the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Frackowiak, E.; Beguin, F. Carbon materials for the electrochemical storage of energy in capacitors. Carbon 2001, 39, 937–950. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lee, H.-M.; Lee, K.; Kim, C.-K. Electrodeposition of manganese-nickel oxide films on a graphite sheet for electrochemical capacitor applications. Materials 2014, 7, 265–274. [Google Scholar]
  3. Nie, H.; Yao, Z.; Zhou, X.; Yang, Z.; Huang, S. Nonenzymatic electrochemical detection of glucose using well-distributed nickel nanoparticles on straight multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Biosens. Bioelectron 2011, 30, 28–34. [Google Scholar]
  4. You, B.; Wang, L.; Yao, L.; Yang, J. Three dimensional N-doped graphene-CNT networks for supercapacitor. Chem. Commun 2013, 49, 5016–5018. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang, M. Multifunctional carbon nanotube yarns by downsizing an ancient technology. Science 2004, 306, 1358–1361. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kordás, K.; Tóth, G.; Moilanen, P.; Kumpumäki, M.; Vähäkangas, J.; Uusimäki, A.; Vajtai, R.; Ajayan, P.M. Chip cooling with integrated carbon nanotube microfin architectures. Appl. Phys. Lett 2007, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Park, K.; Ryu, J.; Kim, K.; Yu, Y.; Jang, J. Growth of carbon nanotubes with resist-assisted patterning process. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2007, 25, 1261–1264. [Google Scholar]
  8. Barsan, M.M.; Pinto, E.M.; Florescu, M.; Brett, C.M.A. Development and characterization of a new conducting carbon composite electrode. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 635, 71–78. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhu, Z.; Garcia-Gancedo, L.; Flewitt, A.J.; Xie, H.; Moussy, F.; Milne, W.I. A critical review of glucose biosensors based on carbon nanomaterials: Carbon nanotubes and graphene. Sensors 2012, 12, 5996–6022. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rao, R.; Chen, G.; Arava, L.M.R.; Kalaga, K.; Ishigami, M.; Heinz, T.F.; Ajayan, P.M.; Harutyunyan, A.R. Graphene as an atomically thin interface for growth of vertically aligned carbon nanotubes. Sci. Rep 2013, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. In, J.B.; Lee, D.; Fornasiero, F.; Noy, A.; Grigoropoulos, C.P. Laser-assisted simultaneous transfer and patterning of vertically aligned carbon nanotube arrays on polymer substrates for flexible Devices. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 7858–7866. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fan, Z.; Yan, J.; Zhi, L.; Zhang, Q.; Wei, T.; Feng, J.; Zhang, M.; Qian, W.; Wei, F. A three-dimensional carbon nanotube/graphene sandwich and its application as electrode in supercapacitors. Adv. Mater 2010, 22, 3723–3728. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ci, L.; Manikoth, S.M.; Li, X.; Vajtai, R.; Ajayan, P.M. Ultrathick freestanding aligned carbon nanotube films. Adv. Mater 2007, 19, 3300–3303. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ryu, J.; Kim, K.; Lee, C.S.; Jang, J.; Park, K. Effect of electrical aging on field emission from carbon nanotube field emitter arrays. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2008, 26, 856–859. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ryu, J.; Bae, N.; Oh, H.; Zhou, O.; Jang, J.; Park, K. Stabilized electron emission from silicon coated carbon nanotubes for a high-performance electron source. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2011, 29, 02B120:1–02B120:5. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ryu, J.; Kang, J.; Park, K. Carbon Nanotube Electron Emitter for X-ray Imaging. Materials 2012, 5, 2353–2359. [Google Scholar]
  17. Meyyappan, M.; Delzeit, L.; Cassell, A.; Hash, D. Carbon nanotube growth by PECVD: A review. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol 2003, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, Y.; Li, L.; Zhang, C.; Casillas, G.; Sun, Z.; Yan, Z.; Ruan, G.; Peng, Z.; Raji, A.-R.O.; Kittrell, C.; et al. A seamless three-dimensional carbon nanotube graphene hybrid material. Nat. Commun 2012, 3, 1225–1227. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yang, J.; Zhang, W.-D.; Gunasekaran, S. An amperometric non-enzymatic glucose sensor by electrodepositing copper nanocubes onto vertically well-aligned multi-walled carbon nanotube arrays. Biosens. Bioelectron 2010, 26, 279–284. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Fabrication and mechanical flexibility test of the all-carbon electrode: (a) Ni deposition on graphite foil; (b) annealing for seed formation; (c) carbon nanotube (CNT) growth and (d) flexibility test.
Figure 1. Fabrication and mechanical flexibility test of the all-carbon electrode: (a) Ni deposition on graphite foil; (b) annealing for seed formation; (c) carbon nanotube (CNT) growth and (d) flexibility test.
Materials 07 01975f1 1024
Figure 2. Schematic illustration and SEM images of growth mechanism of the all-carbon electrode. (a) bare graphite substrate; (b) aggregated Ni catalyst by forming process; (c) burgeon-like CNT at initial 3 min-CNT growth; (d) vertically shape of CNT after 5 min-growth; (e) vertically aligned CNT after 10 min.
Figure 2. Schematic illustration and SEM images of growth mechanism of the all-carbon electrode. (a) bare graphite substrate; (b) aggregated Ni catalyst by forming process; (c) burgeon-like CNT at initial 3 min-CNT growth; (d) vertically shape of CNT after 5 min-growth; (e) vertically aligned CNT after 10 min.
Materials 07 01975f2 1024
Figure 3. SEM image of (a) the morphology of all-carbon electrode; (b) cross-sectional SEM Image of the all-carbon electrode.
Figure 3. SEM image of (a) the morphology of all-carbon electrode; (b) cross-sectional SEM Image of the all-carbon electrode.
Materials 07 01975f3 1024
Figure 4. (a) Cross-sectional TEM image of the all carbon electrode consisting of CNTs and graphite substrate; (b) blow-up image of the area indicated by dashed rectangle.
Figure 4. (a) Cross-sectional TEM image of the all carbon electrode consisting of CNTs and graphite substrate; (b) blow-up image of the area indicated by dashed rectangle.
Materials 07 01975f4 1024
Figure 5. SEM images showing the surface morphology of the all-carbon electrode after the (a) 50th; (b) 150th; (c) 250th rolling cycle.
Figure 5. SEM images showing the surface morphology of the all-carbon electrode after the (a) 50th; (b) 150th; (c) 250th rolling cycle.
Materials 07 01975f5 1024
Figure 6. Cyclic voltammograms of (a) the graphite foil and (b) all-carbon electrode after 250th rolling cycles in 1.0 mM K3Fe(CN)6 in DI water with addition of 0.1 M KCl at potential scan rates ranging from 10 to 200 mV/s. The corresponding peak current dependence on the square root of scan rate in (c) the graphite foil and (d) all-carbon electrode after 250th rolling cycles.
Figure 6. Cyclic voltammograms of (a) the graphite foil and (b) all-carbon electrode after 250th rolling cycles in 1.0 mM K3Fe(CN)6 in DI water with addition of 0.1 M KCl at potential scan rates ranging from 10 to 200 mV/s. The corresponding peak current dependence on the square root of scan rate in (c) the graphite foil and (d) all-carbon electrode after 250th rolling cycles.
Materials 07 01975f6 1024
Table 1. Electrochemical characterizations of graphite foil and all-carbon electrode after 250th bending which are calculated from cyclic voltammograms in the scan rate range 10~200 mV·s−1 using 1mM Fe(CN)63−/4− redox couple.
Table 1. Electrochemical characterizations of graphite foil and all-carbon electrode after 250th bending which are calculated from cyclic voltammograms in the scan rate range 10~200 mV·s−1 using 1mM Fe(CN)63−/4− redox couple.
ParametersGraphite foilAll-carbon electrode
ΔEp (mV) *259.4566.07
Slope from Ipa vs. scan rate 1/2(μA·mV−1/2·s1/2)1.367.06
Slope from Ipc vs. scan rate 1/2(μA·mV−1/2·s1/2)−2.67−8.10
Electroactive area, Aea (cm2) **0.0670.205
Relative Roughness factor ***13.05

*at a scan rate 10 mV/s;**obtained value of slope from Ipa vs. scan rate 1/2;***Aea/Aea-graphite.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ryu, J.-H.; Lee, G.-J.; Kim, W.-S.; Lim, H.-E.; Mativenga, M.; Park, K.-C.; Park, H.-K. All-Carbon Electrode Consisting of Carbon Nanotubes on Graphite Foil for Flexible Electrochemical Applications. Materials 2014, 7, 1975-1983. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7031975

AMA Style

Ryu J-H, Lee G-J, Kim W-S, Lim H-E, Mativenga M, Park K-C, Park H-K. All-Carbon Electrode Consisting of Carbon Nanotubes on Graphite Foil for Flexible Electrochemical Applications. Materials. 2014; 7(3):1975-1983. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7031975

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ryu, Je-Hwang, Gi-Ja Lee, Wan-Sun Kim, Han-Eol Lim, Mallory Mativenga, Kyu-Chang Park, and Hun-Kuk Park. 2014. "All-Carbon Electrode Consisting of Carbon Nanotubes on Graphite Foil for Flexible Electrochemical Applications" Materials 7, no. 3: 1975-1983. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7031975

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop