Next Article in Journal
Micromechanical Properties of a New Polymeric Microcapsule for Self-Healing Cementitious Materials
Next Article in Special Issue
Optically Clear and Resilient Free-Form µ-Optics 3D-Printed via Ultrafast Laser Lithography
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis, Characterization, Tautomeric Structure and Solvatochromic Behavior of Novel 4-(5-Arylazo-2-Hydroxystyryl)-1-Methylpyridinium Iodide as Potential Molecular Photoprobe
Previous Article in Special Issue
Numerical Approach to Modeling and Characterization of Refractive Index Changes for a Long-Period Fiber Grating Fabricated by Femtosecond Laser
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Repetition Rate on Femtosecond Laser-Induced Homogenous Microstructures

Department of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, 3610 University Street, Montreal, QC H3A 0C5, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2016, 9(12), 1023; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9121023
Submission received: 1 November 2016 / Revised: 7 December 2016 / Accepted: 13 December 2016 / Published: 19 December 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ultrafast Laser-Based Manufacturing)

Abstract

:
We report on the effect of repetition rate on the formation and surface texture of the laser induced homogenous microstructures. Different microstructures were micromachined on copper (Cu) and titanium (Ti) using femtosecond pulses at 1 and 10 kHz. We studied the effect of the repetition rate on structure formation by comparing the threshold accumulated pulse ( F Σ p u l s e ) values and the effect on the surface texture through lacunarity analysis. Machining both metals at low F Σ p u l s e resulted in microstructures with higher lacunarity at 10 kHz compared to 1 kHz. On increasing F Σ p u l s e , the microstructures showed higher lacunarity at 1 kHz. The effect of the repetition rate on the threshold F Σ p u l s e values were, however, considerably different on the two metals. With an increase in repetition rate, we observed a decrease in the threshold F Σ p u l s e on Cu, while on Ti we observed an increase. These differences were successfully allied to the respective material characteristics and the resulting melt dynamics. While machining Ti at 10 kHz, the melt layer induced by one laser pulse persists until the next pulse arrives, acting as a dielectric for the subsequent pulse, thereby increasing F Σ p u l s e . However, on Cu, the melt layer quickly resolidifies and no such dielectric like phase is observed. Our study contributes to the current knowledge on the effect of the repetition rate as an irradiation parameter.

1. Introduction

Modification of the surface topography can substantially alter the properties of a surface. Over the years, direct laser micromachining, particularly with femtosecond (fs) lasers, has emerged as a novel and versatile surface modification technique due to certain advantages, such as its ability to micromachine all types of materials under any ambient condition without requiring clean room facilities or high vacuum equipment, and its ability to impart a large variety of hierarchical microstructures in a single processing step [1,2,3,4,5].
Microstructures are formed as a product of the various ablation mechanisms resulting from complex photo-physical processes triggered by the laser-material interaction. A number of factors such as electron-phonon (e-ph) coupling constant and thermal conductivity of the material, wavelength and polarization of the incident light, machining environment and other micromachining parameters, such as the fluence, determine the laser-material interaction and the following ablation mechanism. Since the nature of the micromachining outcome is strongly dependent on several factors, it is desirable to understand how these factors or parameters influence the microstructure formation. Consequently, considerable research effort has been made to study the effects of these micromachining parameters. While the effects of some parameters, such as the laser fluence, scanning velocity, number of scans, and polarization of the light are studied exhaustively [6,7,8,9,10,11,12], few reports exist that study the effect of the laser repetition rate as a machining parameter [10,13,14,15]. Yet again, most of these studies are on single spot experiments, reporting either the variation of ablation depth, ablation rate, or the threshold fluence with repetition rate. However, fabrication of the different microstructures, such as the bumpy or pillow-like structures, conical, and undulated groove-like structures, requires some sort of partial pulse overlapping [16] and to the best of our knowledge, no studies have been reported so far that provide any insights on the effect of repetition rate on laser induced microstructures formed as a result of partially overlapping pulses. For instance, a well-defined correlation between the threshold fluence required for the formation of the microstructures or the structural evolution of the microstructures with the repetition rate does not exist within the Hz and kHz range [14,17,18], which happens to be the range where most microstructures on metals were reported (see Table 1). Thus, it is worthwhile to investigate the effect of the repetition rate on the micromachining outcome to predict microstructure formation.
In this work, we report the effect of repetition rate on the micromachining outcome. Our group had previously reported on the machining of a number of microstructures on copper (Cu) and titanium (Ti) at 10 kHz and on the use of the accumulated fluence profile (AFP) irradiation model in mapping the evolution of the microstructures [23]. Following the same procedure and analysis, we micromachined Cu and Ti at 1 kHz and plotted the evolution of our fabricated microstructures. These evolution plots, generated at 1 kHz and 10 kHz, were then compared. This allowed us to directly analyze the effect of repetition rate on microstructure evolution. Additionally, we analyzed the lacunarity (surface texture) of the microstructures at the two repetition rates to identify any topological changes caused due to change in the repetition rate.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Cu (99.9% purity, McMaster-Carr) and Ti (Grade 2, 98.9% purity, McMaster-Carr, Elmhurst, IL, USA) were used in this study. Prior to laser micromachining, all samples were polished with 600 and 1200 grit sandpaper and ultrasonicated in acetone for 5 min.

2.2. Laser Micromachining

Samples were attached to a linear xz translation stage (Newport Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA) controlled by the GOL3D software (GBC&S, Brie Comte Robert, France). A Ti:Sapphire laser (Coherent Libra, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with wavelength 800 nm, pulse duration <100 fs, and repetition rate (f) of 1 kHz was used for micromachining area patches. A 100-mm focusing lens was used to focus the horizontally polarized Gaussian laser beam onto the sample. The maximum output power of 4 W was reduced to the desired processing power with a variable attenuator composed of a half-wave plate and a polarizing beam splitter. At first, the effective line width ( ω e f f ) was determined from the line scans obtained at a respective power (P), scanning velocity (v), and position of the sample from the focus (Δy). Thereafter, the area patches (1 mm by 1 mm) were micromachined in a raster scan pattern. To achieve that, a single line was machined at first by overlapping the pulses in the horizontal (x-) direction in displacements of Δx (=v/f). Thereafter, these horizontal lines were overlapped (overlap percentage, φ l i n e ) in the vertical (z-) direction to machine an area patch. The machining parameters (P, v, Δy, φ l i n e ) were varied over a wide range and a number of raster scans were carried out at several possible combinations of these parameters to yield various microstructures. All samples were raster scanned once, and were ultrasonicated after micromachining in acetone for 5 min to remove the nanoparticle debris.

2.3. Structure Analysis

2.3.1. SEM and Optical Microscopy

The ω e f f was measured by an optical microscope (Leica EZ4 D, Wetzlar, Germany). The resulting mico- and nano-structures were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (FEI Inspect F50, Hillsboro, OR, USA) and categorized into different types based on their structures.

2.3.2. Lacunarity (λ)

The spatial heterogeneity of hierarchical microstructures can be conveniently studied by lacunarity analysis. The lacunarity plots can be utilized to highlight structural changes, mainly in terms of their coarseness or texture, caused by the changes in the machining parameters. In our experiments, any structural differences between the microstructures brought about by the change in repetition rate were identified from their lacunarity analysis, which was carried out using their SEM images.
Typically the lacunarity is calculated using the sliding-box counting algorithm [24], where a box of dimension r × r slides across a binary image of size M × N and the number of foreground (white) and background (black) pixels in that box is measured at each position along the image generating a distribution. The lacunarity λ of the image is then calculated from the distribution:
λ ( r ) = ( s k ( r ) k ¯ ( r ) ) 2 + 1
where s k and k ¯ represent the standard deviation and mean of the foreground pixel distribution respectively at a given box size r. Equation (1) shows that λ ( r ) is a measure of the ratio of the standard deviation of the foreground pixels to their mean at a given r. As the image becomes more spatially heterogenous (greater variance), the λ ( r ) increases, alternatively suggesting that an image with a higher lacunarity value is spatially coarse or clumped, while an image with a lower lacunarity value corresponds to fine texture. The highest value of λ ( r ) is obtained at r = 1, where the lacunarity depends only on the proportion of the foreground pixels relative to the entire image and is equal to 1/P, where P is the total number of foreground pixels divided by the total number of pixels. When r approaches the image size M, the normalized standard deviation of the foreground pixels approaches zero and λ ( r ) tends to unity. However, for structure comparison, looking at lacunarity values at a single r does not reflect the overall texture, since λ ( r ) is dependent on the box size r. One way of generating a single lacunarity parameter is by calculating the area under the ln(λ) vs. ln(r) curve
θ = 0 ln M ln ( λ ) d l n ( r )
where M is the smaller dimension of the image being analyzed and θ is known as the spatial heterogeneity index. A detailed formulation of λ ( r ) , its limiting cases, and the use of θ in analyzing the structural hierarchy can be found in the recent study by Ling et al. [25]. The lacunarity analysis presented in this study was carried out following the same procedure.
For each structure, three SEM images at 1000× magnification (1024 pixels × 842 pixels) were captured from surfaces of the same structure type but micromachined at different settings. At this magnification, 1 pixel represents ~0.29 µm. During image acquisition, the brightness and contrast of the SEM images were adjusted to ensure maximum consistency. The grayscale SEM images were converted to binary images by first equalizing their histograms and then applying a threshold of 0.5 to maintain constant foreground and background pixels. Thereafter, using the software plugin FracLac in ImageJ and the sliding-box counting method, the analysis was carried out for each microstructure. This resulted in plots of ln(λ) as a function of ln(r). The effect of changing repetition rate on the microstructures’ lacunarity was studied by comparing their θ values calculated from each lacunarity plot.

2.4. Accumulated Pulse Fluence (AFP) Model

Partial pulse overlapping is necessary to extend microstructure formation over an area [16]. Consequently, it is not justified to use the pulse fluence to analyze the microstructures. The accumulated fluence resulting from partially overlapping Gaussian pulses can be calculated using the AFP irradiation model [16,26]. The fluence distribution of individual pulses is given by:
F p ( x , y , z ) =   ( 8 P π ω t h e o 2 f ) exp ( 8 ( x 2 + z 2 ) ω t h e o 2 )
where ω t h e o is the theoretical beam diameter. Summing up individual successive pulses in the horizontal displacement of Δx gives the measure of the accumulated pulse fluence, F Σ p u l s e , which results in a single line scan. Summing successive line scans in the vertical displacements of Δz (= (1 − φ l i n e ) ω e f f ) gives the measure of the accumulated line fluence, F Σ l i n e , which is equivalent to the resulting fluence deposited over the reference area. Use of the AFP model is advantageous not only because it gives a measure of the total fluence distribution over a reference area, but it also converges all the micromachining parameters like P, v, Δy, and φ l i n e into two parameters, the pulse—( F Σ p u l s e ), and the line—( F Σ l i n e ) accumulated fluence. During comparison, it is straight forward to work with just these two parameters in contrast to considering all four micromachining parameters individually.

2.5. Repetition Rate Comparison

The effect of repetition rate on microstructure formation was studied by comparing the evolution plots of the microstructures machined at 1 kHz and 10 kHz generated using the AFP irradiation model. Only the homogenous microstructures were considered for comparison. At first, we identified the different types of homogenous microstructures from their SEM images and calculated their F Σ p u l s e and F Σ l i n e values from their respective machining parameters. Thereafter, we plotted the microstructures as a function of F Σ p u l s e and F Σ l i n e . The threshold F Σ p u l s e values, at which a specific microstructure started to appear, were identified for each homogenous microstructure and the effect of the repetition rate was studied by comparing these threshold F Σ p u l s e values obtained at 1 and 10 kHz. It is worth mentioning that the fabricated microstructures are the result of pulse overlapping in displacements of both Δx and φ l i n e . To assess the effect of changing repetition rate, F Σ pulse values were considered which incorporate the repetition rate through Δx directly into the accumulated fluence model. Thus, the comparison was based on the F Σ p u l s e values.

3. Results

3.1. Microstructures Fabricated at 1 kHz

3.1.1. Copper (Cu)

Micromachining Cu at 1 kHz yielded eight different types of microstructures. SEM images of the representative microstructures are shown in Figure 1a–h.
Out of these, the nanoforest like structures (Figure 1a), the deep and well defined trenches (Figure 1b), the narrow trenches (Figure 1c), and the chaotic microstructures (Figure 1d) were also reported on Cu micromachined at 10 kHz (Figure S1 in Supplemental Information) [23]. Since these four structures were reproducible on Cu at both 1 kHz and 10 kHz, they will be referred to as the common microstructures in later sections. Ripples were also produced at both 1 and 10 kHz, however, we will restrict our discussion purely to the microstructure formation as our interest lies primarily in studying the effect of repetition rate on more complex structures. Our experiments at 1 kHz yielded four additional microstructures; the tree bark structure (Figure 1e), the stalagmites (Figure 1f), the fish scales (Figure 1g), and the aggregate structures (Figure 1h). To the best of our knowledge, all four of these structures are reported for the first time. A comprehensive list of the micromachined structures is provided in Table 2.
While the tree bark structures consisted of interwoven long streaks of about 10 µm diameter running parallel to each other along the horizontal scan direction, the stalagmite structures consisted of saw-tooth like features of about 10 µm diameter directed towards the vertical scan direction. The fish scale structures were considerably larger than the rest of the microstructures having a diameter of about 25 µm and seemingly several layers stacked on top of one another. Interestingly, in the case of the aggregate microstructures, some regions were deeper than others (Figure 1h); such behavior was not observed for the rest of the microstructures. At first, this led us to believe that the top surface was just the nanoparticle debris that had partially broken off at the top layer. However, even with an increase in the sample cleaning time, we did not achieve complete removal of the top surface. Furthermore, the underlying structure did not resemble any other types of microstructures shown here. We recognized the observed morphology as another different class of microstructure, which we described as aggregate microstructures.

3.1.2. Titanium (Ti)

Micromachining Ti at 1 kHz yielded six different types of microstructures. SEM images of the representative microstructures are shown in Figure 2a–f and are listed in Table 2.
Out of these, the undulating grooves (Figure 2a), the bumpy structures (Figure 2b), the holes (Figure 2c), and the chaotic structures (Figure 2d) were reproducible on Ti at both 1 and 10 kHz [23] (Figure S2 in Supplemental Information), and they will be referred to as the common microstructures on Ti. Additionally, micromachining Ti at 1 kHz, yielded two new structures; the stalagmite and the aggregate like structures. Again, to the best of our knowledge, here they are reported on Ti for the first time. Interestingly, the trench-like structures that were micromachined on Ti at 10 kHz [23] were not reproducible at 1 kHz. The stalagmite structures machined on Ti were noticeably different to the ones machined on Cu. Not only did they look smaller, they were less prominent on Ti as compared to Cu, where well-defined saw-tooth-like features existed. The aggregate structures on Ti, however, showed the same behavior of partial breaking at certain places, as seen on the Cu aggregate structures.

3.2. Effect of Repetition Rate

3.2.1. Copper (Cu)

The evolution of the microstructures on Cu machined at 1 and 10 kHz is shown in the F Σ l i n e vs. F Σ p u l s e plots (Figure 3).
At both 1 kHz and 10 kHz, the common microstructure on Cu evolved from nanoforest like structures to form narrow trenches, which further gave way to form deep trenches with increasing F Σ p u l s e . At 1 kHz, the nanoforest like structures required a threshold F Σ p u l s e of 120 J/cm2. Micromachining parameters that resulted in F Σ p u l s e values below this threshold generated ripples.
On increasing F Σ p u l s e above 400 J/cm2, the nanoforest like structures gave way to form narrow trenches. On further increasing F Σ p u l s e above 2101 J/cm2, the narrow trenches gave way to form deep trenches. Interestingly, when these threshold F Σ p u l s e values were compared to their counterparts obtained at 10 kHz, the threshold F Σ p u l s e were observed to have reduced for all the common microstructures (see Table 3).
For instance, the nanoforest structures that required a threshold F Σ p u l s e of 120 J/cm2 at 1 kHz required a threshold of 88 J/cm2 at 10 kHz. Similarly, for the narrow trenches that required a threshold of 400 J/cm2 at 1 kHz the threshold F Σ p u l s e decreased to 282 J/cm2 at 10 kHz. The deep trenches having a threshold of 2101 J/cm2 at 1 kHz, were fabricated at a much lower threshold F Σ p u l s e of 353 J/cm2 at 10 kHz. The persistent trend observed in all the common microstructures suggested a decrease in the threshold F Σ p u l s e values of the microstructures with an increase in the repetition rate.

3.2.2. Titanium (Ti)

The F Σ l i n e vs. F Σ p u l s e plots for the common microstructures on Ti machined at 1 kHz and 10 kHz are shown in Figure 4 and their respective threshold F Σ p u l s e values are listed in Table 3.
With increasing F Σ p u l s e , the microstructures evolved from the undulating grooves at lower F Σ p u l s e values, to bumpy structures, which further gave way to form the holes and the chaotic structures. At 1 kHz, the undulating grooves required a threshold F Σ p u l s e of 80 J/cm2. On increasing the F Σ p u l s e above 112 J/cm2, the bumpy structures started to appear, which with further increase in F Σ p u l s e gave way to form the holes and finally the chaotic microstructures. The holes required a threshold of 233 J/cm2 and the chaotic structures required a threshold of 400 J/cm2. However, at 10 kHz the threshold F Σ p u l s e values of the common microstructures were observed to have increased. For instance, the threshold F Σ p u l s e values of the undulating grooves increased to 90 J/cm2 at 10 kHz. Similarly, the threshold values of the other common microstructures, i.e., the bumpy structures, the holes, and the chaotic structures, increased to 165 J/cm2, 275 J/cm2, and 565 J/cm2, respectively, at 10 kHz, suggesting that an overall increase in the threshold F Σ p u l s e values is required for the microstructures to be reproducible at 10 kHz. This is unlike the case of Cu, where the threshold F Σ p u l s e values for the microstructures were observed to have decreased with an increase in the repetition rate.

3.3. Lacunarity Analysis

3.3.1. Copper (Cu)

For the purpose of comparison, only the lacunarity of the common microstructures were plotted. Figure 5 shows the lacunarity plots obtained from analyzing one SEM image per microstructure at 1 kHz and 10 kHz.
At 1 kHz, the spatial heterogeneity index, θ, was observed to increase as the microstructures evolved from nanoforest to the narrow trenches and finally to the deep trenches, having θ = 0.72, 1.45, and 1.86, respectively. Generally, an increase in the θ value indicates an increase in the structure coarseness. Consecutively, this indicates that the microstructures on Cu become more clumped or heterogeneous, i.e., lacked texture, as they evolved from nanoforest like structures to deep trenches. The coarseness of the deep trenches is higher than that for the narrow trenches, probably due to the thicker sections present in between the deep trenches as compared to the narrow trenches which adds to the spatial variation, and thus, makes them highly morphologically heterogeneous. At 10 kHz, similar trends in lacunarity were observed among the structures. Nanoforest structures are the least coarse, i.e., highly textured, having θ = 0.98, followed by the narrow trenches, having θ = 1.69, and finally followed by the deep trenches, which showed the maximum coarseness, i.e., least texture, with θ = 1.71.
The effect of repetition rate can be assessed by comparing the microstructures individually at the two repetition rates. As seen from the θ value, the nanoforest and the narrow trench-like structures appeared coarser when they were fabricated at 10 kHz rather than at 1 kHz. It is interesting to note the switchover in the coarseness of the microstructures as they evolve. The microstructures fabricated at lower F Σ p u l s e values, such as the nanoforest and the narrow trench-like structures (see Table 3), are coarser when micromachined at 10 kHz than at 1 kHz. As F Σ p u l s e is increased and the high F Σ p u l s e regime is reached, for instance where deep trenches were fabricated, the microstructures show higher coarseness when machined at 1 kHz in comparison to 10 kHz. Likewise, the results suggest that with an increase in the F Σ p u l s e values, the lacunarity of the microstructures at 10 kHz tends to reduce in comparison to their counterparts fabricated at 1 kHz. Although the exact reason behind such behavior observed in the microstructures at 10 kHz is still unclear, this behavior is further confirmed from the cross over seen in the lacunarity of the 10 kHz microstructures (Figure 5b). For instance, at 10 kHz, the deep trenches showed θ = 1.71 whereas the narrow trenches showed θ = 1.69 indicating that the deep trenches are coarser than the narrow trenches, yet we see the cross over indicating that the lacunarity of any structure machined at F Σ p u l s e values much higher than the deep trenches would show complete cross over.

3.3.2. Titanium (Ti)

The lacunarity plots of the common microstructures machined on Ti are shown in Figure 6. The spatial heterogeneity index, θ, of the microstructures at 1 kHz was observed to increase as they evolved with increasing F Σ p u l s e . The undulating grooves that were fabricated at lower F Σ p u l s e were the least coarse structure with θ = 0.82, followed by the bumpy structures with θ = 1.42, followed by the holes with θ = 1.93. Interestingly, however, with further increase in the F Σ p u l s e , which lead to the formation of the chaotic microstructures, the coarseness of the structures dropped. For instance, the chaotic structures showed θ = 1.78. The spatial heterogeneity of the chaotic structures was lower than the holes, probably because in chaotic structures the agglomerates that formed in the ridges in between tended to cover up the holes underneath, homogenizing the overall topology. Whereas, in the case of holes, the absence of the agglomerate structures adds on to the structural heterogeneity. Similar trends were observed in the lacunarity of the microstructures machined at 10 kHz.
As the microstructures evolved with increasing F Σ p u l s e , their spatial heterogeneity increased, with undulating grooves being the least coarse, showing θ = 1.14, followed by the bumpy structures, showing θ = 1.58, and the holes, showing θ = 1.62. On further increasing F Σ p u l s e , the coarseness of the microstructure reduced, as observed in the chaotic structures, showing θ = 1.59.
Comparison of the θ value for individual structures at the two repetition rates showed that the microstructures fabricated at lower F Σ p u l s e values are coarser when micromachined at 10 kHz. For instance, the undulating grooves and the bumpy microstructures that are machined at lower F Σ p u l s e values (see Table 3) appear coarser at 10 kHz.
As F Σ p u l s e is increased and the high F Σ p u l s e regime is reached, where for instance the holes and the chaotic microstructures were fabricated, the microstructures appear coarser when fabricated at 1 kHz. Alternatively, with an increase in the F Σ p u l s e values, the lacunarity of the microstructures at 10 kHz was observed to reduce in comparison to their counterparts fabricated at 1 kHz. Overall, the behavior in the lacunarity of the microstructures on Ti was very similar to what we observed on Cu; with increasing F Σ p u l s e , the lacunarity of the microstructures at 10 kHz reduces and becomes lower than their counterparts at 1 kHz.

4. Discussion

It is interesting to see the different effects that pulse repetition rate has on the machining outcome. On Cu, the increase in repetition rate resulted in the lowering of the threshold F Σ p u l s e values of the microstructures, whereas for Ti, it resulted in an increase in the threshold F Σ p u l s e values. Ahmmed et al. [23], utilizing the material properties (e-ph coupling constant and thermal conductivity), provided a perception as to why different materials produce different microstructures under exactly alike machining conditions. Material properties along with laser-material interaction are the primary factors that govern the micromachining outcome. Additionally, secondary factors, such as melt dynamics or plasma formation [22], also play significant roles. To account for the differences observed on the machining outcome on the two materials with the change in repetition rate, we have considered the material properties and the prevailing material dynamics in between consecutive pulses.
It was suggested that the changes that occur in the material after the first pulse strikes largely decides the course of the consecutive pulse-material interaction [27]. In our experiment, the time interval between consecutive pulses at 1 kHz and 10 kHz is around 999 µs and 99 µs, respectively. During multiple femtosecond pulse ablation, a significant amount of thermal energy is deposited in metal samples causing localized heating which results in the formation of a melt layer [28,29,30,31]. If we consider the material properties, such as Cu that has a weak e-ph coupling constant (~0.48 × 1017 W/m3/K) [32] and high thermal conductivity (401 W/m/K), this combination of the material properties ensures quick dissipation of the thermal energy into the bulk, due to which the generated melt layer persists for only a short time. Ren et al. [33] modelled the lattice temperature variation of Cu and found that the melt layer induced by a single pulse of fluence 0.5 J/cm2 can persist roughly 200 ps, after which the resolidification process starts. During machining of Cu with overlapping pulses, as executed in our experiments, the pulse intervals at both 1 and 10 kHz are considerably long. The melt generated by one pulse resolidifies before the onset of the next pulse, leaving only structural defects on the material. Consequently, the consecutive laser pulses ablate on the resolidified surface. The structural defects on the material, resulting from the interaction of the material with the first pulse, and the resolidification process further enhance the absorption of the next incoming pulses [14,34,35]. At higher repetition rates, the number of defects generated in the material increases significantly due to a higher number of pulses per spot (PPS). This results in an increase in the energy absorption of the consecutive pulses, overall leading to the reduction in the ablation threshold. This is observed on Cu, where with an increase in repetition rate from 1 to 10 kHz, the ablation threshold reduces which is reflected in the reduction of the threshold F Σ p u l s e values of the microstructures (nanoforest: 120 J/cm2 (1 kHz), 88 J/cm2 (10 kHz); narrow trenches: 400 J/cm2 (1 kHz), 282 J/cm2 (10 kHz); deep trenches: 2101 J/cm2 (1 kHz), 353 J/cm2 (10 kHz)).
On the contrary, Ti has a strong e-ph coupling constant (~18.5 × 1017 W/m3/K) [32] and low thermal conductivity (~21.9 W/m/K), which ensures rapid energy transport from the electrons to the lattice but slow dissipation of the heat into the bulk, resulting in large amount of heat accumulation on the surface. Consequently, the melt layer persists for a longer time, approximately 300 µs [36]. If we consider the repetition rate, at 1 kHz the pulses are 999 µs apart. Therefore, while machining at 1 kHz, after the material has interacted with the first pulse, complete resolidification of the melt occurs before the arrival of the next pulse. Whereas at 10 kHz, the melt layer created by the first pulse persists when the next pulse hits, and it interacts with the melt rather than the resolidified material. Rapid irradiation of the melt causes the melt to proceed into a metastable state. As the temperature of the melt increases and reaches approximately 0.8 times the critical temperature (Tc), fluctuations observed in local density of the melt can lead to thermodynamic instability [37,38,39]. The onset of these fluctuations can cause rapid changes in the material properties, such as a loss of electrical conductivity due to many isolated regions of limited free electrons. It was shown that under these conditions, the optical transmission of the melt increases, its reflectivity decreases, and it acts as a dielectric. Likely this dielectric behavior of the melt is responsible for the increase in the ablation threshold at 10 kHz. For material ablation, free charge carriers are required that can oscillate in the electromagnetic field of the laser. Dielectrics, unlike metals, lack free charge carriers and therefore require additional energy, equivalent to the ionization potential, to generate the free charge carriers. Thus, in general, dielectrics have a higher ablation threshold than metals [40]. This higher ablation threshold is reflected in the higher threshold F Σ p u l s e values of the microstructures at 10 kHz (undulating grooves: 80 J/cm2 (1 kHz), 90 J/cm2 (10 kHz); bumps: 112 J/cm2 (1 kHz), 165 J/cm2 (10 kHz); holes: 233 J/cm2 (1 kHz), 275 J/cm2 (10 kHz); Chaotic: 400 J/cm2 (1 kHz), 565 J/cm2 (10 kHz)).
Additionally, with the change in repetition rate, we observed the appearance or disappearance of certain microstructures. For instance, the tree bark, stalagmite, fish scales, and aggregate structures on Cu and the aggregate and stalagmite structures on Ti were fabricated at 1 kHz but were not reported at 10 kHz. Although the precise reason behind such observation is still unclear, we believe that a preliminary explanation can be provided based on the melt dynamics. The formation mechanism of these microstructures depends on the competitive process between the nucleation and the melt dynamics, which is vastly decided by the experimental parameters. If noted carefully, the new microstructures on both Cu and Ti at 1 kHz (see Figure 3a and Figure 4a) appear over a narrow range of the F Σ p u l s e values, implying that a narrow range of experimental conditions is favorable for the production of these new microstructures. Tuning of the experimental parameters at the other repetition rate might not have led to the experimental conditions favorable for the production of these structures at that repetition rate.
Interestingly, in comparison to the opposing behavior observed in the effect of repetition rate on the threshold F Σ p u l s e values, the similar trends observed in the lacunarity of the microstructures on both the metals with changing repetition rate indicate that the changes in the surface texture with repetition rate is independent of the material properties. In general, with increasing F Σ p u l s e   we observed an increase in the spatial heterogeneity of the microstructures at both repetition rates. Nayak and Gupta [7] observed a decrease in the microstructure density with increasing fluence on Ti. The increase in spatial heterogeneity with increasing F Σ p u l s e in our microstructures could be attributed to the reduction in the microstructure density, resulting from more clumped structures at higher F Σ p u l s e . However, the most important observation on the effect of the repetition rate on surface texture is the switch over in the microstructure lacunarity observed at higher F Σ p u l s e , i.e., microstructures fabricated at lower F Σ p u l s e show higher lacunarity at 10 kHz, while at higher F Σ p u l s e the microstructures show higher lacunarity at 1 kHz. In this regard, it is important to note that for the structures where the switch over occurs, all have hierarchical structures; for instance, the holes and chaotic structures on Ti have agglomerates deposited on them, and they show higher spatial heterogeneity when micromachined at 1 kHz. Thus, the higher lacunarity seen in these structures at 1 kHz, compared to 10 kHz, is likely related to the presence of these agglomerates. The size of the agglomerates, formed due to vapor condensation [41], depends on the amount of vapor plume supersaturation, which in turn is determined by the plume temperature. Factors determining the plume temperature could be both the laser fluence as well as the heat accumulation resulting from the decrease in the pulse interval [42]. At higher F Σ p u l s e and at a higher repetition rate (10 kHz), the increase in the plume temperature decreases the plume supersaturation. It was suggested that the agglomerate size increases with the decrease in the supersaturation [43,44,45]. Most likely, the increase in the agglomerate size is responsible for the observed reduction in the spatial heterogeneity of the microstructures at 10 kHz. However, the trend observed in the lacunarity of the microstructures at lower F Σ p u l s e still remains unclear and needs to be considered in future studies.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study shows the effect of repetition rate on the micromachining outcome on metals. Cu and Ti were micromachined with <100 fs pulses at 1 kHz and 10 kHz repetition rates. Several homogenous microstructures were machined. While most of these microstructures were reproducible at both the repetition rates, certain microstructures were observed only at a specific repetition rate. The effect of repetition rate on structure formation was studied by comparing the threshold F Σ p u l s e values of the common microstructures at 1 kHz and 10 kHz and the effect of the repetition rate on surface texture was studied through lacunarity analysis. The microstructures on both metals showed similar trends in their lacunarity with changing repetition rate, i.e., microstructures fabricated at lower F Σ p u l s e values showed higher spatial heterogeneity at 10 kHz, whereas those fabricated at higher F Σ p u l s e values showed a higher spatial heterogeneity index at 1 kHz. However, the effect of changing the repetition rate on the threshold F Σ p u l s e were considerably different on both metals. On Cu, with the increase in repetition rate from 1 to 10 kHz, the threshold F Σ p u l s e values of the microstructures were observed to decrease, whereas on Ti, the threshold F Σ p u l s e values were observed to increase. These differences in the micromachining outcome were successfully addressed considering two important material properties (e-ph coupling constant and thermal conductivity). Alongside, our results show that the melt dynamics (such as the resolidification time) further contribute significantly to the micromachining outcome. Our study suggests that the micromachining outcome in any material at a particular repetition rate within the Hz–kHz range can be anticipated if these three material properties (e-ph coupling constant, thermal conductivity, and the resolidification time) are known.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/9/12/1023/s1. Figure S1: Representative images of the microstructures on Cu machined at 10 kHz, Figure S2: Representative images of the microstructures on Ti machined at 10 kHz.

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported by the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Nature et technologies (FRQNT).

Author Contributions

Sanchari Biswas and Adya Karthikeyan designed the experiments, performed the SEM characterization and analyzed the data. Sanchari Biswas performed the lacunarity analysis and wrote the manuscript. Anne-Marie Kietzig supervised the work and edited the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zorba, V.; Stratakis, E.; Barberoglou, M.; Spanakis, E.; Tzanetakis, P.; Fotakis, C. Tailoring the wetting response of silicon surfaces via fs laser structuring. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 2008, 93, 819–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, Y.; Lowe, R.M.; Harvey, E.; Hannaford, P.; Endo, A. High aspect-ratio micromachining of polymers with an ultrafast laser. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2002, 186, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kietzig, A.-M.; Hatzikiriakos, S.G.; Englezos, P. Patterned superhydrophobic metallic surfaces. Langmuir 2009, 25, 4821–4827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Yang, X.; Li, W. Effects of laser repetition rate and fluence on micromachining of TiC ceramic. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2016, 31, 832–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tanvir Ahmmed, K.M.; Grambow, C.; Kietzig, A.M. Fabrication of micro/nano structures on metals by femtosecond laser micromachining. Micromachines 2014, 5, 1219–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, B.; Zhou, M.; Li, J.; Ye, X.; Li, G.; Cai, L. Superhydrophobic surfaces fabricated by microstructuring of stainless steel using a femtosecond laser. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 256, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nayak, B.K.; Gupta, M.C. Self-organized micro/nano structures in metal surfaces by ultrafast laser irradiation. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2010, 48, 940–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ling, E.J.Y.; Saïd, J.; Brodusch, N.; Gauvin, R.; Servio, P.; Kietzig, A.-M. Investigating and understanding the effects of multiple femtosecond laser scans on the surface topography of stainless steel 304 and titanium. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 353, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kam, D.H.; Bhattacharya, S.; Mazumder, J. Control of the wetting properties of an aisi 316l stainless steel surface by femtosecond laser-induced surface modification. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2012, 22, 105019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lopez, J.; Faucon, M.; Devillard, R.; Zaouter, Y.; Honninger, C.; Mottay, E.; Kling, R. Parameters of influence in surface ablation and texturing of metals using high-power ultrafast laser. J. Laser Micro Nanoeng. 2015, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yong Hwang, T.; Guo, C. Polarization and angular effects of femtosecond laser-induced conical microstructures on Ni. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 111, 083518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tsukamoto, M.; Asuka, K.; Nakano, H.; Hashida, M.; Katto, M.; Abe, N.; Fujita, M. Periodic microstructures produced by femtosecond laser irradiation on titanium plate. Vacuum 2006, 80, 1346–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ancona, A.; Döring, S.; Jauregui, C.; Röser, F.; Limpert, J.; Noite, S.; Tünnermann, A. Femtosecond and picosecond laser drilling of metals at high repetition rates and average powers. Opt. Lett. 2009, 34, 3304–3306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Di Niso, F.; Gaudiuso, C.; Sibillano, T.; Mezzapesa, F.P.; Ancona, A.; Lugarà, P.M. Influence of the repetition rate and pulse duration on the incubation effect in multiple-shots ultrafast laser ablation of steel. Phys. Proced. 2013, 41, 698–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Finger, J.; Reininghaus, M. Effect of pulse to pulse interactions on ultra-short pulse laser drilling of steel with repetition rates up to 10 mhz. Opt. Express 2014, 22, 18790–18799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Eichstädt, J.; Römer, G.R.B.E.; Huis in‘t Veld, A.J. Determination of irradiation parameters for laser-induced periodic surface structures. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 264, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lopez, J.; Torres, R.; Zaouter, Y.; Georges, P.; Hanna, M.; Mottay, E.; Kling, R. Study on the influence of repetition rate and pulse duration on ablation efficiency using a new generation of high power ytterbium doped fiber ultrafast laser. Proc. SPIE 2013, 8611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bruneel, D.; Matras, G.; Le Harzic, R.; Huot, N.; König, K.; Audouard, E. Micromachining of metals with ultra-short Ti-Sapphire lasers: Prediction and optimization of the processing time. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2010, 48, 268–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zuhlke, C.A.; Anderson, T.P.; Alexander, D.R. Fundamentals of layered nanoparticle covered pyramidal structures formed on nickel during femtosecond laser surface interactions. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 283, 648–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vorobyev, A.Y.; Guo, C. Colorizing metals with femtosecond laser pulses. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vorobyev, A.Y.; Makin, V.S.; Guo, C. Periodic ordering of random surface nanostructures induced by femtosecond laser pulses on metals. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 101, 034903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zuhlke, C.A.; Anderson, T.P.; Alexander, D.R. Formation of multiscale surface structures on nickel via above surface growth and below surface growth mechanisms using femtosecond laser pulses. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 8460–8473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ahmmed, K.M.T.; Ling, E.J.Y.; Servio, P.; Kietzig, A.-M. Introducing a new optimization tool for femtosecond laser-induced surface texturing on titanium, stainless steel, aluminum and copper. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2015, 66, 258–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Allain, C.; Cloitre, M. Characterizing the lacunarity of random and deterministic fractal sets. Phys. Rev. A 1991, 44, 3552–3558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ling, E.J.Y.; Servio, P.; Kietzig, A.-M. Fractal and lacunarity analyses: Quantitative characterization of hierarchical surface topographies. Microsc. Microanal. 2016, 22, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lehr, J.; Kietzig, A.M. Production of homogenous micro-structures by femtosecond laser micro-machining. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2014, 57, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guk, I.; Shandybina, G.; Yakovlev, E. Influence of accumulation effects on heating of silicon surface by femtosecond laser pulses. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 353, 851–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cheng, J.; Liu, C.S.; Shang, S.; Liu, D.; Perrie, W.; Dearden, G.; Watkins, K. A review of ultrafast laser materials micromachining. Opt. Laser Technol. 2013, 46, 88–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vorobyev, A.Y.; Guo, C. Direct femtosecond laser surface nano/microstructuring and its applications. Laser Photonics Rev. 2013, 7, 385–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Von der Linde, D. Laser-solid interaction in the femtosecond time regime. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1997, 109–110, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vorobyev, A.Y.; Guo, C. Enhanced absorptance of gold following multipulse femtosecond laser ablation. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72, 195422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Brorson, S.D.; Kazeroonian, A.; Moodera, J.S.; Face, D.W.; Cheng, T.K.; Ippen, E.P.; Dresselhaus, M.S.; Dresselhaus, G. Femtosecond room-temperature measurement of the electron-phonon coupling constant γ in metallic superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1990, 64, 2172–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ren, Y.; Cheng, C.W.; Chen, J.K.; Zhang, Y.; Tzou, D.Y. Thermal ablation of metal films by femtosecond laser bursts. Int. J. Ther. Sci. 2013, 70, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mannion, P.T.; Magee, J.; Coyne, E.; O’Connor, G.M.; Glynn, T.J. The effect of damage accumulation behaviour on ablation thresholds and damage morphology in ultrafast laser micro-machining of common metals in air. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2004, 233, 275–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ni, X.; Wang, C.-Y.; Yang, L.; Li, J.; Chai, L.; Jia, W.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, Z. Parametric study on femtosecond laser pulse ablation of au films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006, 253, 1616–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Semmar, N.; Tebib, M.; Tesar, J.; Puscas, N.N.; Amin-Chalhoub, E. Direct observation of phase transitions by time-resolved pyro/reflectometry of krf laser-irradiated metal oxides and metals. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 5549–5552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xu, X.; Willis, D.A. Non-equilibrium phase change in metal induced by nanosecond pulsed laser irradiation. J. Heat Transf. 2001, 124, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Martynyuk, M.M. Phase explosion of a metastable fluid. Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 1977, 13, 178–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Song, K.H.; Xu, X. Explosive phase transformation in excimer laser ablation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1998, 127, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gamaly, E.G.; Rode, A.V.; Luther-Davies, B.; Tikhonchuk, V.T. Ablation of solids by femtosecond lasers: Ablation mechanism and ablation thresholds for metals and dielectrics. Phys. Plasmas 2002, 9, 949–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Koch, J.; von Bohlen, A.; Hergenroder, R.; Niemax, K. Particle size distributions and compositions of aerosols produced by near-ir femto- and nanosecond laser ablation of brass. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 2004, 19, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tillack, M.S.; Blair, D.W.; Harilal, S.S. The effect of ionization on cluster formation in laser ablation plumes. Nanotechnology 2004, 15, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sivayoganathan, M.; Tan, B.; Venkatakrishnan, K. Effect of mega-hertz repetition rate on the agglomerated particle size of femtosecond synthesized nanostructures. Opt. Mater. Express 2012, 2, 987–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Eaton, S.M.; Zhang, H.; Herman, P.R.; Yoshino, F.; Shah, L.; Bovatsek, J.; Arai, A.Y. Heat accumulation effects in femtosecond laser-written waveguides with variable repetition rate. Opt. Express 2005, 13, 4708–4716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Piñon, V.; Anglos, D. Optical emission studies of plasma induced by single and double femtosecond laser pulses. Spectrochim. Acta Part B Atom. Spectrosc. 2009, 64, 950–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Representative images of the microstructures on Cu machined at 1 kHz (a) Nanoforest; (b) Deep and well defined trenches; (c) Narrow trenches; (d) Rough and rugged chaotic structures; (e) Tree bark; (f) Stalagmite structures; (g) Fish scales and (h) Aggregate structures showing the partial breaking (solid circle) of the top layer and the underlying structure (dashed circle). All scale bars represent 50 µm.
Figure 1. Representative images of the microstructures on Cu machined at 1 kHz (a) Nanoforest; (b) Deep and well defined trenches; (c) Narrow trenches; (d) Rough and rugged chaotic structures; (e) Tree bark; (f) Stalagmite structures; (g) Fish scales and (h) Aggregate structures showing the partial breaking (solid circle) of the top layer and the underlying structure (dashed circle). All scale bars represent 50 µm.
Materials 09 01023 g001
Figure 2. Representative images of the microstructures on Ti machined at 1 kHz. (a) Undulating grooves; (b) Bumpy structures; (c) Holes; (d) Chaotic structures; (e) Stalagmites and (f) Aggregate structures. All scale bars represent 50 µm.
Figure 2. Representative images of the microstructures on Ti machined at 1 kHz. (a) Undulating grooves; (b) Bumpy structures; (c) Holes; (d) Chaotic structures; (e) Stalagmites and (f) Aggregate structures. All scale bars represent 50 µm.
Materials 09 01023 g002
Figure 3. F Σ l i n e vs. F Σ p u l s e plots on Cu at (a) 1 kHz and (b) 10 kHz [23]. (Reprinted from Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 66, K.M. Tanvir Ahmmed, Edwin Jee Yang Ling, Phillip Servio, Anne-Marie Kietzig, Introducing a new optimization tool for femtosecond laser-induced surface texturing on titanium, stainless steel, aluminum and copper, 258-268, 2014, with permission from Elsevier.)
Figure 3. F Σ l i n e vs. F Σ p u l s e plots on Cu at (a) 1 kHz and (b) 10 kHz [23]. (Reprinted from Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 66, K.M. Tanvir Ahmmed, Edwin Jee Yang Ling, Phillip Servio, Anne-Marie Kietzig, Introducing a new optimization tool for femtosecond laser-induced surface texturing on titanium, stainless steel, aluminum and copper, 258-268, 2014, with permission from Elsevier.)
Materials 09 01023 g003
Figure 4. F Σ l i n e vs. F Σ p u l s e plots on Ti at (a) 1 kHz and (b) 10 kHz [23].
Figure 4. F Σ l i n e vs. F Σ p u l s e plots on Ti at (a) 1 kHz and (b) 10 kHz [23].
Materials 09 01023 g004
Figure 5. Lacunarity plots for the common microstructures on Cu at (a) 1 kHz and (b) 10 kHz.
Figure 5. Lacunarity plots for the common microstructures on Cu at (a) 1 kHz and (b) 10 kHz.
Materials 09 01023 g005
Figure 6. Lacunarity plots for the common microstructures on Ti at (a) 1 kHz and (b) 10 kHz.
Figure 6. Lacunarity plots for the common microstructures on Ti at (a) 1 kHz and (b) 10 kHz.
Materials 09 01023 g006
Table 1. Experimental conditions of various microstructures on metals.
Table 1. Experimental conditions of various microstructures on metals.
Microstructures in MetalsMicromachining Parameters (Wavelength, Repetition Rate, Pulse Duration, Fluence)Reference
Periodic nanostructures (LIPSS)
Ni800 nm, 1 kHz, 500 fs, 2.04 J/ cm 2 Zuhlke et al. 2013 [19]
Al800 nm, 100 Hz, 65 fs, 0.05 J/ cm 2 Vorobyev and Guo 2008 [20]
Au800 nm, 1 kHz, 65 fs, 0.16 J/ cm 2 Vorobyev et al. 2007 [21]
Undulated groove microstructures
Ti800 nm, 1 kHz, 100 fs, 0.75 J/ cm 2 Tsukamoto et al. 2006 [12]
Ninot reported, 1 kHz, 50 fs, 1.392 J/ cm 2 Zuhlke et al. 2013 [22]
Columnar microstructures
Ti800 nm, 1 kHz, 130 fs, 0.75 J/ cm 2 Nayak and Gupta 2010 [7]
Ninot reported, 1 kHz, 50 fs, 1.392–3.08 J/ cm 2 Zuhlke et al. 2013 [22]
Al800 nm, 1 kHz, 130 fs, <0.16 J/ cm 2 Nayak and Gupta 2010 [7]
Bumpy microstructures
Al800 nm, 10 kHz, <100 fs, 0.4–1 J/ cm 2 Ahmmed et al. 2015 [23]
Ti800 nm, 10 kHz, <100 fs, 1.5–3 J/ cm 2 Ahmmed et al. 2015 [23]
Conical microstructures
Ti800 nm, 1 kHz, 130 fs, 0.5–1.2 J/ cm 2 Nayak and Gupta 2010 [7]
Ni800 nm, 1 kHz, 50 fs, 0.12 J/ cm 2 Zuhlke et al. 2013 [19]
Table 2. Microstructures fabricated at the two repetition rates.
Table 2. Microstructures fabricated at the two repetition rates.
MicrostructuresLabels as in Figure 1 and Figure 21 kHz10 kHzComment
Cu
NanoforestFigure 1aCommon microstructures
Trench: narrowFigure 1c
TrenchFigure 1b
Tree barkFigure 1e×
StalagmiteFigure 1f×
Fish scaleFigure 1g×
AggregateFigure 1h×
Ti
Undulating groovesFigure 2aCommon microstructures
BumpsFigure 2b
HolesFigure 2c
ChaoticFigure 2d
Trench×
StalagmiteFigure 2e×
AggregateFigure 2f×
Table 3. The threshold F Σ p u l s e values of the common microstructures at 1 and 10 kHz [23] (in J/cm2).
Table 3. The threshold F Σ p u l s e values of the common microstructures at 1 and 10 kHz [23] (in J/cm2).
Common MicrostructuresLabels as in Figure 1 and Figure 21 kHz10 kHz
Cu
NanoforestFigure 1a12088
Trench:narrowFigure 1c400282
TrenchFigure 1b2101353
Ti
Undulating groovesFigure 2a8090
BumpsFigure 2b112165
HolesFigure 2c233275
ChaoticFigure 2d400565

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Biswas, S.; Karthikeyan, A.; Kietzig, A.-M. Effect of Repetition Rate on Femtosecond Laser-Induced Homogenous Microstructures. Materials 2016, 9, 1023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9121023

AMA Style

Biswas S, Karthikeyan A, Kietzig A-M. Effect of Repetition Rate on Femtosecond Laser-Induced Homogenous Microstructures. Materials. 2016; 9(12):1023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9121023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Biswas, Sanchari, Adya Karthikeyan, and Anne-Marie Kietzig. 2016. "Effect of Repetition Rate on Femtosecond Laser-Induced Homogenous Microstructures" Materials 9, no. 12: 1023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9121023

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop