Next Article in Journal
Tribocorrosion Failure Mechanism of TiN/SiOx Duplex Coating Deposited on AISI304 Stainless Steel
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Pre-Oxidation Treatment of Nano-SiC Particulates on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of SiC/Mg-8Al-1Sn Composites Fabricated by Powder Metallurgy Combined with Hot Extrusion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Acoustic Behavior of Hollow Blocks and Bricks Made of Concrete Doped with Waste-Tire Rubber

1
Engineering Data Mining And Numerical Simulations (EDMANS) Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of La Rioja, 26004 Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
2
Centro de Investigación en Tecnologías Gráficas, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 València, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2016, 9(12), 962; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9120962
Submission received: 6 October 2016 / Revised: 21 November 2016 / Accepted: 22 November 2016 / Published: 26 November 2016

Abstract

:
In this paper, we investigate the acoustic behaviour of building elements made of concrete doped with waste-tire rubber. Three different mixtures were created, with 0%, 10%, and 20% rubber in their composition. Bricks, lattice joists, and hollow blocks were manufactured with each mixture, and three different cells were built and tested against aerial and impact noise. The values of the global acoustic isolation and the reduction of the sound pressure level of impacts were measured. Results proved that highly doped elements are an excellent option to isolate low frequency sounds, whereas intermediate and standard elements constitute a most interesting option to block middle and high frequency sounds. In both cases, the considerable amount of waste-tire rubber recycled could justify the employment of the doped materials for the sake of the environment.

1. Introduction

Traditionally, waste has been managed towards its burial in landfills, with or without previous incineration and/or compression. Nevertheless, this is no longer a satisfactory practice, since it is well-known that natural resources are limited and pollution levels are threatening the current way of life. An interesting new approach to minimizing waste and reducing the consumption of resources consists of reincorporating industrial waste and by-products to the manufacturing processes of the same or other products. This is the base for achieving a so-called “circular economy” [1,2,3].
Examples of circular economy with regard to building materials are increasingly popular. For instance, ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) generated in the manufacturing of footwear is used to improve the thermal behaviour of non-structural concrete [4], and sawdust timber together with low-density poly-propylene is employed to produce masonry bricks with enhanced acoustic absorption rates [5].
Following the same philosophy, using waste-tire rubber as an aggregate in the manufacturing of building elements could both contribute to the preservation of the environment and meet the official requirements set for building elements [6,7,8]. In some specific cases, they could even improve the performance of traditional elements.
Commonly, building elements such as bricks, lattice joists, and hollow blocks are made of ceramics, plaster, or concrete. In the case of ceramic and plaster elements, previous studies have analysed the possibility of incorporating waste-tire rubber with success [9,10,11,12]. In the case of concrete elements, research has been focused on incorporating different materials (including end-of-life tires) to investigate selected features [13,14,15,16]. Rubberized concrete has shown a superior strain modulus compared to regular ceramic bricks, and therefore an improved behaviour towards seismic actions [17,18]. It has also been verified to be more noise-absorbent than regular concrete. Therefore, it is an excellent candidate for the construction of highway noise barriers [19,20] and asphalt pavement [21].
Further works have analysed of the durability and safety of the concrete–rubber mixtures. The analyses have proven the suitability of the concrete–rubber mixture as structural and non-structural material [22,23,24,25,26]. A suitable model is required to describe the behaviour of concrete doped with rubber in engineering applications. Evolutionary polynomial regression (ERP)—a new evolutionary technique of data mining—has been used to forecast the mechanical properties of concrete doped with rubber [27].
In this research, we investigate the acoustic behaviour of waste-tire rubber concrete bricks (wall elements), lattice joists, and hollow blocks (unidirectional slab elements) with different proportions of rubber in the mixture. Geometrically identical cells were built with the elements made of every mixture. Therefore, we assess the acoustic performance of bricks, lattice joists, and hollow blocks jointly, and not as separate components, since they work together in real buildings. The acoustic performance of building elements is influenced by several complex factors. Hence, it is necessary to validate any constructive new proposal with specific tests, such as the one previously described [28].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Raw materials were initially stored in different silos. Later, they were mixed homogeneously by means of an industrial kneader for 3 min. Three different mixtures were created. Namely, M1, M2, and M3. Each mixture had a different percentage of waste-tire rubber, and therefore a different density, as displayed by Table 1. As rubber is less dense than conventional concrete, the density of the mixture decreases as the rubber content increases.
These waste-tire rubber percentages were established as the most convenient by a previous study [6]. The doped particles of rubber are visible in Figure 1.
To manufacture the bricks and hollow blocks, the fresh mixture was poured into the corresponding mold and pressed by an automatic compacting unit (model PB-1200, Balbinot, Bellegarde-Sur-Valserine, France) at 69 KPa for 5 s. The mixture was vibrated simultaneously until the elements were removed from the mold. Then, the elements were brought to the curing chamber by means of a tray conveyor (see Figure 2 and Figure 3).
Lattice joists were originally made of conventional concrete (code HA-25-B-12-IIa). Scrap-tire rubber was incorporated as a top layer to obtain an elastic support for the hollow blocks (see Figure 4).

2.2. Cell Geometry and Composition

Commonly, the acoustic properties of a new material are assessed by testing individual samples according to the standards (ISO, ASTM, etc.). This kind of assessment is required, and reveals essential information about the performance of the material. However, the assessment of the material in real performance conditions should be considered in order to acquire a deep knowledge of the tangible potential of the material. Therefore, three cells (rooms) were built with the elements manufactured with every mixture—namely, cells C1, C2, and C3. This is an interesting new approach to the acoustic evaluation of new materials.
The three cells had equal external dimensions (2.00 m × 2.00 m × 2.60 m). Each one was made of two short support walls, a unidirectional slab floor, four perimeter walls at 90°, and a top slab. As shown in Figure 5, the support walls sat over the shop floor, the slab floor rested over the support walls, the perimeter walls were raised over the slab floor, and finally, the top slab was laid on top of the perimeter walls. An entrance in the shape of a rectangle was initially opened in one of the walls to allow for the introduction of the measuring equipment. The entrance was then closed for measurement with the same building elements. Results were collected by a computer outside of the closed cells.
The support walls were made of 20 cm-thick concrete blocks. The perimeter walls were made of 10 cm-thick prefabricated bricks. Both slabs were 30 cm thick. They were made of the prefabricated lattice joists and hollow blocks. Conventional (non-doped) concrete mortar was used to build every component of the cells. Table 2 summarizes the correlation between the cells and the mixtures.
Cells were built inside a large industrial warehouse (dimensions significantly higher than the dimensions of the cells).

2.3. Equipment

The following equipment was used in order to carry out the acoustical measurements:
  • Sound analyser BRÜEL & KJAER, model 2260.
  • Sound calibrator BRÜEL & KJAER Type 4231.
  • Noise generator BEHRINGER ULTRACURVE, model DSP-8000.
  • Tapping machine BRÜEL & KJAER, model 3207.
  • Standard microphone.
  • Measurement equipment were all properly certified.

2.4. Methodology

Airborne and impact sound insulation were considered to investigate the acoustic behaviour of the three cells. The pair of parameters DnT (Standardized Level Difference) and DnT,w (Weighted Standardized Level Difference); and Ln (Normalized Impact Sound Pressure Level) and Ln,w (Weighted Normalized Impact Sound Pressure Level) were measured to assess each type of sound isolation. As previously commented, these are “in-situ” measurements, ideally adapted to the geometry of the cells and the characteristics of the environment.
Measurements were taken in the frequency band interval from 50 to 5000 Hz. Nevertheless, only the results of the interval between 100 and 3015 Hz were assessed. Study frequencies were 100, 125, 160, 200, 250, 315, 400, 500, 630, 800, 1000, 1025, 1006, 2000, 2005, and 3015 (one-third octave bands). Thus the spectral adaptation coefficients could be considered. Comparisons were made in one-third octave bands, so that they could be conducted in more detail.
A minimum of six readings were considered to calculate the average of the different parameters. One position of the loudspeaker and three positions of the microphone with two readings each were carried out.
ISO standards 140-3 [29], 140-4 [30], 140-5 [31], 140-7 [32], 140-9 [33], 140-10 [34], 717-1 [35], and 717-2 [36] were taken as references for this acoustic evaluation. Nevertheless, the particular characteristics of the building elements and cells made the literal application of such standards impossible, and several modifications of the standard’s procedures were necessary. Therefore, conclusions were based on the comparison between the responses of the three different building elements of this particular research.
All measurements were taken in the daytime. Background noise was measured and compensated to avoid the interference of external sources. Temperature and moisture were measured to assure that their values were compatible with the specifications of the equipment.
Readings were taken by applying sampling methods of the sound pressure with intervals of 10 s, selected within the evaluation time span.
At the beginning and end of each reading, the sensitivity of the equipment was verified with the sound calibrator, according to standard IEC 60942:2003 [37]. A deviation no higher than 0.3 dB from the initial reference value was guaranteed.

2.4.1. Reverberation Time

For the measurement of the reverberation time, standard ISO-3382 [38] was used, employing the method of the integrated impulsive response because of its simplicity. The range of fall in use was always larger than 20 dB, but small enough to tend to a straight line. At the end of the range, the range of fall must be larger than 10 dB over the background noise. The pulse source must be able to generate a level of peak acoustic pressure so that the falling curve started at least 45 dB above the background noise of the corresponding frequency band.
The volume of the industrial warehouse (13,500 m3) was taken for the calculation of the absorbent surface. In the case of the airborne sound insulation, reverberation times were so large (due to the dimensions of the warehouse) that they were not considered. Figure 6 represents the geometry of the warehouse and the location of the three cells inside.

2.4.2. Airborne Sound Insulation

The assessment of the airborne sound isolation was done by means of parameters DnT and DnT,w. The method of the difference between the emitted level and the transmitted level employing dB(A) was used, since the possible absorption of the warehouse (receiver enclosure) had to be considered as a constitutive part of the isolation of the cell (transmitter enclosure).
The sound source was located inside the cell, so that a fuzzy acoustic field was created, with level differences no higher than 6 dB between third octave adjacent bands. Two speakers were used, located at two opposite corners of the experiment wall. Both speakers sat on elastic bases, to avoid solid transmission of sound. The sound created was stationary and had a continuous spectrum in the range on the considered frequencies, which provided a proper signal–noise correlation in the high frequencies of the warehouse. The power of the sound created was high enough so that the sound pressure in the warehouse was at least 10 dB higher than the background noise in any frequency band.
A microphone was located in the warehouse to capture the transmitted sound. Three different positions of this microphone were considered for readings (Figure 7):
  • Position A: at 1.50 m from the centre of perimeter wall A (wall parallel to the main direction of the lattice joists of the slabs).
  • Position B: at 1.50 m from the centre of perimeter wall B (wall perpendicular to the main direction of the lattice joists of the slabs).
  • Position C: at 1.50 m from the centre of the top slab.

2.4.3. Impact Sound Insulation

The assessment of the impact sound insulation within interior enclosures was done by means of parameters Ln and Ln,w.
The impact machine was located over the middle point of the top slab, at 45° to the main direction of the lattice joists. The transmitted impact sound was read using a microphone located in the geometrical centre of the inner volume of the cell (Figure 8).
The relative humidity and temperature of the warehouse were registered. They met the technical requirements indicated by the equipment manufacturer. Readings were taken only after the sound created by the impacts was stationary.

3. Results

The main objective of the research was to assess the acoustic behaviour of waste-tire rubber concrete as building material. The procedure described here does not follow any particular standard, but three cells were built and tested. Therefore, relative results are more relevant than absolute results. In other words, the results of cell C1 (0% rubber) were taken as the benchmark, and the performance of cells C2 and C3 were compared to them. According to this approach, two ratios were calculated:
  • Relative improvement of the Standardized Level Difference:
    RIDnTCi = (DnTCiDnTC1)/DnTC1
  • and Relative improvement of the Normalized Impact Sound Pressure Level:
    RILnTCi = (LnTCiLnC1)/LnC1
On the other hand, it is worth remarking that we observed that in all study cases and measurements, background and source noise were grouped into a band of ±1.5 dB. Therefore, the readings were very meaningful.

3.1. Airborne Sound Insulation

With regard to airborne sound insulation, cell C3 showed the best improvement for sound frequencies between 100 and 140 Hz approximately (Figure 9). Therefore, it is convenient to isolate very low frequency sounds, such as low frequency instruments (bass guitar, bass drum, etc.) or low frequency road traffic vehicles (heavy trucks, tractors, etc.).
Cell C1 presents the best results for frequencies between 150 and 500 Hz (Figure 9). Those are the frequencies of fundamental male and female voices.
Cell C2 is the best solution for frequencies higher than 500 up to 2500 Hz. Particularly, cell C2 has a remarkable performance at 630 Hz (Figure 10).
For frequencies higher than 2000 Hz, differences between C1 and C2 are too narrow to differentiate between them, whereas cell C3 presents a poor response (Figure 10).

3.2. Impact Sound Insulation

With regard to impact sound insulation, C2 and C3 have a similar response for frequencies approximately between 100 and 190 Hz, providing a better insulation than C1—up to 15% in the case of C3 (Figure 11).
From approximately 190 to 290 Hz, both cells had a worse response than the standard—up to 10% (Figure 11). From 290 Hz and on, C2 is essentially less insulant than C1. However, from approximately 1300 to 2250 Hz, the performance of C3 was up to 7% better (Figure 12).

4. Conclusions

Based on the research presented here, some remarkable conclusions could be drawn.
Based on previous works, building elements could be doped with waste-tire rubber up to 20%. Elements with the maximum percentage of rubber in their composition (20%) provide a better response than the standard (0%), and the intermediate doped elements (10%) for low frequencies up to 140 dB in the case of airborne insulation, and 190 dB in the case of impact sound insulation. In the first case, the improvement was up to 50%, whereas in the second case, this percentage was hardly 15%. Therefore, highly doped construction elements are convenient to isolate very low frequency sounds, such as low frequency instruments (bass guitar, bass drum, etc.), low frequency road traffic vehicles (heavy trucks, tractors, etc.), barking dogs, greencuts, and chainsaws.
For middle and high frequencies, highly doped materials are generally less insulant than traditional materials. Intermediate doped materials show a more satisfactory result, although very close to the standard. Therefore, the intermediate doped and standard solutions are better to insulate average tone human voices, baby crying, vacuum cleaners, phones, airplanes, and low frequency motorbikes.
An explanation for this behaviour can be found in the interface generated between mortar and rubber. In a previous work [6], electronic microscopy showed a lack of interconnection in the interface created between mortar and rubber when concrete doped with waste-tire rubber is manufactured. The microcracks generated in this interface were able to soften and even absorb the effect of low frequencies, whereas high frequencies were only slightly affected. The increase of the percentage of rubber increments the presence of microcracks, so the displacement of sound pressure is allowed. Actually, material mixtures with a 10% and 20% of waste-tire rubber are around a 5% and a 10% less dense than conventional concrete, respectively. The reduction in density is due to the emergence of these microcracks, which encapsulate air. So, it could be stated that air–rubber and rubber–concrete borders of the microcracks encapsulate low frequency sounds, but are mainly effectless for high frequency sounds. Another point of interest is the ratio of density reduction versus waste-tire rubber. A correlation of 1 to 2 could be observed in this research. Nevertheless, this value is probably dependent on the manufacturing process of the building elements. In this work, vibro-compaction and slow curing were used. Both processes facilitated the expansion of the rubber inside the mixtures. Nevertheless, it might be profitable to investigate the influence of the manufacturing process in the acoustic response of the building elements.
Considering these conclusions, highly doped materials could be especially profitable in the building of auditoriums and highway sound barriers. Together with the insulation, the amount of recycled rubber in such bricks could be very positive for the environment.
On the other hand, intermediate doped materials could be used to build domestic constructions. Their insulant properties equal standard materials, and still offer a good opportunity to recycle waste-tire rubber.

Acknowledgments

All the authors are greatly indebted to the company VIGAS MAZO S.L. for funding parts of this research through the project cod. OTEM140130. The authors would also like to express their gratitude for the support of the University of La Rioja and the Universitat Politècnica de València.

Author Contributions

Esteban Fraile-Garcia and Javier Ferreiro-Cabello conceived and designed the experiments; Esteban Fraile-Garcia and Javier Ferreiro-Cabello performed the experiments; Beatriz Defez and Guillermo Peris-Fajanes analysed the data; Esteban Fraile-Garcia and Javier Ferreiro-Cabello and Beatriz Defez and Guillermo Peris-Fajanes wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Duan, N. Cleaner Production, Eco-Industry and Circular Economy. Res. Environ. Sci. Available online: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HJKX200106000.htm (accessed on 24 November 2016).
  2. Andersen, M.S. An introductory note on the environmental economics of the circular economy. Sustain. Sci. 2007, 2, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. MacArthur, E. Towards a Circular Economy—Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition; Ellen MacArthur Foundation: Cowes, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. De Melo, A.B.; Silva, E.P. Bloques de hormigón ligero con áridos reciclados de EVA: Una contribución a la eficiencia térmica de paredes exteriores de edificios. Mater. Constr. 2013, 63, 479–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Munoz Guzman, A.D.; Trotta Munno, M.G. Design of a brick with sound absorption properties based on plastic waste & sawdust. IEEE Access 2015, 3, 1260–1271. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sodupe-Ortega, E.; Fraile-Garcia, E.; Ferreiro-Cabello, J.; Sanz-Garcia, A. Evaluation of crumb rubber as aggregate for automated manufacturing of rubberized long hollow blocks and bricks. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 106, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fraile-Garcia, E.; Ferreiro-cabello, J.; Martinez-camara, E.; Jimenez-macias, E. Adaptation of methodology to select structural alternatives of one-way slab in residential building to the guidelines of the European Committee for Standardization (CEN/TC 350). Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2015, 55, 144–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yu, C.J.; Kang, J. Environmental impact of acoustic materials in residential buildings. Build. Environ. 2009, 44, 2166–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Niroumand, H.; Kassim, K.A. Comparison of compressive strength in mud bricks with shred tires and concrete particles as sustainable materials. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 2010, 15, 1151–1158. [Google Scholar]
  10. Niroumand, H.; Millona, K. Mud bricks and shred geogrids as sustainable material. Geotech. News 2010, 28, 59–61. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheung, K.H.; Koshy, P.; Inglis, C.; Numata, T.; Sorrell, C.C. Preliminary analysis of gas emissions during firing of clay bricks containing end-of-life rubber tyres. J. Aust. Ceram Soc. 2015, 51, 9–17. [Google Scholar]
  12. Herrero, S.; Mayor, P.; Hernández-Olivares, F. Influence of proportion and particle size gradation of rubber from end-of-life tires on mechanical, thermal and acoustic properties of plaster–rubber mortars. Mater. Des. 2013, 47, 633–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ganjian, E.; Khorami, M.; Maghsoudi, A.A. Scrap-tyre-rubber replacement for aggregate and filler in concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23, 1828–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Segre, N.; Joekes, I. Use of tire rubber particles as addition to cement paste. Cem. Concr. Res. 2000, 30, 1421–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khaloo, A.R.; Dehestani, M.; Rahmatabadi, P. Mechanical properties of concrete containing a high volume of tire-rubber particles. Waste Manag. 2008, 28, 2472–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Panda, K.C.; Parhi, P.S.; Jena, T. Scrap-Tyre-Rubber replacement for aggregate in cement concrete: Experimental study. Int. J. Earth Sci. Eng. 2012, 5, 1692–1701. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, F.; Ding, J.; Liu, F.; Xu, Y. The experiment of basic mechanical properties of CRB masonry. Shenyang Jianzhu Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/J. Shenyang Jianzhu Univ. Nat. Sci. 2013, 29, 50–55. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang, F.; Kang, T.; Yang, Y.; Lu, S. Seismic behaviour of the wall-frame structure infilled with rubber concrete brick. Shenyang Jianzhu Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/J. Shenyang Jianzhu Univ. Nat. Sci. 2015, 31, 661–670. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhu, H.; Carlson, D.D. A spray based crumb rubber technology in highway noise reduction application. J. Solid Waste Technol. Manag. 2001, 27, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  20. Han, Z.; Chunsheng, L.; Kombe, T.; Thong-On, N. Crumb rubber blends in noise absorption study. Mater. Struct. 2008, 41, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, Y.; Bird, R.N.; Heidrich, O. A review of the use of recycled solid waste materials in asphalt pavements. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2007, 52, 58–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Demir, F.; Yesilata, B.; Turgut, P.; Bulut, H.; Isiker, Y. Investigation of the effects of pH, aging and scrap tire content on the dissolution behaviors of new scrap tire-concrete mixture structures. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 93, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Santos, R.M.; Ferreira, F.B.S.; Panzera, T.H.; Borges, P.H.R.; Scarpa, F. Cementitious composites with rubber particles from recycled tyres: Physical and mechanical properties. J. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 8, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ahmed, A. Environmental properties of waste and by-product materials used in constructions. J. Solid Waste Technol. Manag. 2014, 40, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pedro, D.; de Brito, J.; Veiga, R. Mortars made with fine granulate from shredded tires. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2013, 25, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nadal Gisbert, A.; Gadea Borrell, J.M.; Parres García, F.; Juliá Sanchis, E.; Crespo Amorós, J.E.; Segura Alcaraz, J.; Salas Vicente, F. Analysis behaviour of static and dynamic properties of Ethylene-Propylene-Diene-Methylene crumb rubber mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 50, 671–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ahangar-Asr, A.; Faramarzi, A.; Javadi, A.A.; Giustolisi, O. Modelling mechanical behaviour of rubber concrete using evolutionary polynomial regression. Eng. Comput. 2011, 28, 492–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dijckmans, A.; Vermeir, G. Development of a hybrid wave based-transfer matrix model for sound transmission analysis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2013, 133, 2157–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics—Measurement of Sound Insulation in Buildings and of Building Elements—Part 3: Laboratory Measurements of Airborne Sound Insulation of Building Elements—Amendment 1: Installation Guidelines for Lightweight Twin Leaf Partitions; ISO 140-3:1995/A1:2005; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  30. International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics—Measurement of Sound Insulation in Buildings and of Building Elements—Part 4: Field Measurements of Airborne Sound Insulation between Rooms; ISO 140-4:1999; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  31. International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics—Measurement of Sound Insulation in Buildings and of Building Elements—Part 5: Field Measurements of Airborne Sound Insulation of Façade Elements and Façades; ISO 140-5:1999; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  32. International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics—Measurement of Sound Insulation in Buildings and of Building Elements—Part 7: Field Measurements of Impact Sound Insulation of Floors; ISO 140-7:1999; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  33. International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics—Measurements of Sound Insulation in Buildings and of Building Elements—Part 9: Laboratory Measurement of Room-to-Room Airborne Sound Insulation of a Suspended Ceiling with a Plenum above It; ISO 140-9:1985; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  34. International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics—Measurement of Sound Insulation in Buildings and of Building Elements—Part 10: Laboratory Measurement of Airborne Sound Insulation of Small Building Elements; ISO 140-10:1991; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  35. International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics—Rating of Sound Insulation in Buildings and of Building Elements—Part 1: Airborne Sound Insulation; ISO 717-1:2013; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  36. International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics—Rating of Sound Insulation in Buildings and of Building Elements—Part 2: Impact Sound Insulation; ISO 717-2:2013; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  37. International Electrotechnical Commission. Electroacoustics—Sound Calibrators. Spanish Association for Standardization), AENOR; ICE 60942:2003; International Electrotechnical Commission: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  38. International Organization for Standardization. Acoustics—Measurements of the Reverberation Time of Rooms with Reference to Other Acoustical Parameters; ISO 3382:2001; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2001. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Mixtures: M1 (left); M2 (centre); M3 (right).
Figure 1. Mixtures: M1 (left); M2 (centre); M3 (right).
Materials 09 00962 g001
Figure 2. Brick manufacturing: compacting unit (left); and tray conveyor (right).
Figure 2. Brick manufacturing: compacting unit (left); and tray conveyor (right).
Materials 09 00962 g002
Figure 3. Hollow block manufacturing.
Figure 3. Hollow block manufacturing.
Materials 09 00962 g003
Figure 4. Lattice joist manufacturing: recently incorporated rubber layer (left); and after consolidating (right).
Figure 4. Lattice joist manufacturing: recently incorporated rubber layer (left); and after consolidating (right).
Materials 09 00962 g004
Figure 5. Geometry of the cells.
Figure 5. Geometry of the cells.
Materials 09 00962 g005
Figure 6. Geometry of the warehouse and location of cells inside.
Figure 6. Geometry of the warehouse and location of cells inside.
Materials 09 00962 g006
Figure 7. Location of the microphone with respect to the cells.
Figure 7. Location of the microphone with respect to the cells.
Materials 09 00962 g007
Figure 8. Measurement of the impact sound insulation.
Figure 8. Measurement of the impact sound insulation.
Materials 09 00962 g008
Figure 9. RIDnT (%) vs. frequency (Hz) for each cell type. Frequency range 100–500 Hz.
Figure 9. RIDnT (%) vs. frequency (Hz) for each cell type. Frequency range 100–500 Hz.
Materials 09 00962 g009
Figure 10. RIDnT (%) vs. frequency (Hz) for each cell type.
Figure 10. RIDnT (%) vs. frequency (Hz) for each cell type.
Materials 09 00962 g010
Figure 11. RILn (%) vs. frequency (Hz) for each cell type. Frequency range 100–500 Hz.
Figure 11. RILn (%) vs. frequency (Hz) for each cell type. Frequency range 100–500 Hz.
Materials 09 00962 g011
Figure 12. RILn (%) vs. frequency (Hz) for each cell type.
Figure 12. RILn (%) vs. frequency (Hz) for each cell type.
Materials 09 00962 g012
Table 1. Composition and density of mixtures.
Table 1. Composition and density of mixtures.
MaterialsM1M2M3
Waste-tire rubber (%)01020
Average dry
density (kg/m3)
2036.81930.31847.5
Table 2. Composition of the building elements.
Table 2. Composition of the building elements.
Cell TypeMixture
BricksHollow BlocksLattice JoistsSupport WallsConcrete Mortar
C1M1M1M1M1M1
C2M2M2M1 + rubber layerM1M1
C3M3M3M1 + rubber layerM1M1

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fraile-Garcia, E.; Ferreiro-Cabello, J.; Defez, B.; Peris-Fajanes, G. Acoustic Behavior of Hollow Blocks and Bricks Made of Concrete Doped with Waste-Tire Rubber. Materials 2016, 9, 962. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9120962

AMA Style

Fraile-Garcia E, Ferreiro-Cabello J, Defez B, Peris-Fajanes G. Acoustic Behavior of Hollow Blocks and Bricks Made of Concrete Doped with Waste-Tire Rubber. Materials. 2016; 9(12):962. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9120962

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fraile-Garcia, Esteban, Javier Ferreiro-Cabello, Beatriz Defez, and Guillermo Peris-Fajanes. 2016. "Acoustic Behavior of Hollow Blocks and Bricks Made of Concrete Doped with Waste-Tire Rubber" Materials 9, no. 12: 962. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9120962

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop