Next Article in Journal
Spindle-E Acts Antivirally Against Alphaviruses in Mosquito Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Chondrocytes Contribute to Alphaviral Disease Pathogenesis as a Source of Virus Replication and Soluble Factor Production
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 10
Issue 2
10.3390/v10020087
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Survey on West Nile and Usutu Viruses in Horses and Birds in Poland

by
Barbara Bażanów
1,*,
Petrus Jansen van Vuren
2,3,
Piotr Szymański
4,
Dominika Stygar
5,
Agnieszka Frącka
1,
Jan Twardoń
6,
Roland Kozdrowski
6 and
Janusz T. Pawęska
2,3
1
Department of Pathology, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wroclaw, Poland
2
National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg 2131, South Africa
3
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa
4
The Wild Animal and Bird of Prey Breeding and Protection Center (ZYS Foundation), 54-530 Wroclaw, Poland
5
Department of Physiology, School of Medicine with Dentistry Division in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland
6
Department of Reproduction and Clinic of Farm Animals, University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wroclaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2018, 10(2), 87; https://doi.org/10.3390/v10020087
Submission received: 19 January 2018 / Revised: 9 February 2018 / Accepted: 13 February 2018 / Published: 17 February 2018
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
West Nile virus (WNV) and Usutu virus (USUV) are members of the family Flaviviridae which, natural life cycles involve mosquito–bird–mosquito transmission. Both represent emerging viruses in Europe with potential to cause neuroinvasive disease in humans. This study investigates the seroprevalence of serum neutralizing antibodies to WNV and to USUV in birds and in horses in Poland. Antibodies against WNV and USUV were detected in 5 (35.7%) and in 1 (7.14%) of 14 birds and in 62 (15.08%) and in 115 (27.98%) of 411 horses, respectively. Twenty-one WNV serologically positive horses (33.87%) and 67 USUV serologically positive horses (58.26%) did not travel outside Polish borders. Given the high abundance of potentially competent mosquito species in Poland, high populations of horses and different bird species, our findings highlight implementation of active control programs, including monitoring of geographic spread and dynamics of WNV and USUV transmission in both primary and accidental hosts. It is also important to improve public health awareness about the disease these viruses may cause.

1. Introduction

West Nile virus (WNV) and Usutu virus (USUV) are mosquito-borne zoonotic agents belonging to the genus Flavivirus, family Flaviviridae [1,2]. WNV was first isolated in 1937 in the West Nile region of Uganda from a patient suffering a mild febrile illness [3,4]. Over the past decades, the virus became endemic in Europe, Africa, Asia, the Middle East and Australia [5] and it is now well recognized as a human [1,4,5,6], equine [7,8], and avian neuropathogen [1,4,9,10]. In 1999 WNV, was introduced into the United States where it caused severe epidemic of meningoencephalitis in New York City. Subsequently, it spread throughout Canada, Central America and the Caribbean [11]. The occurrence of WNV was confirmed in 20 countries of the European Union, including close neighbors of Poland [1,12]. Previous serological surveys in Poland showed low seroprevalence of WNV antibodies in wild birds, horses and humans [3,12,13,14]. It is rather surprising then that results of recent study in humans indicate high exposure to WNV [14].
USUV was first isolated in 1959 in South Africa from Culex mosquitoes [2]. In Europe, it was first isolated in Austria, in 2001, after a significant die-off of Eurasian blackbirds. Subsequently, it has been isolated throughout Europe from countries such as Hungary, Switzerland, Spain, Italy, Germany and Belgium [2]. Serological evidence of USUV presence in birds was also found in England, Czech Republic, Spain, Switzerland, Germany, Italy and Greece. In countries neighboring Poland, such as Germany and Czech Republic, the recurrence of the virus suggests persistence of the transmission cycle in the affected areas, possibly through overwintering mosquitoes [15]. In Poland, antibodies to USUV were found in 2008 in a seagull (Larus ridibundus) representing the only evidence of the virus potential activity in the country [13].
The natural life cycles of WNV and USUV involve mosquito–bird–mosquito transmission with occasional spill-over to dead-end hosts such as humans, horses or rodents [2,9,16]. Infected birds develop viremia that allows transmission to competent mosquito vectors. In the world, over 300 bird species may potentially act as vertebrate hosts for WNV [4] and infected migratory birds are thought to spread the viruses to wild birds living in disease free areas [4,11]. Infected birds develop a high-titer viremia that allows transmission to feeding mosquitoes, particularly those belonging to the genus Culex, which are considered the principal vectors of WNV. Most infected birds usually survive WNV infection, but certain species have been shown to develop fatal disease [9,10]. Among clinically diagnosed humans and horses, mortality rates can be up to 10% and 25–45%, respectively [4,17]. Human infections due to USUV seem to be less common. The first reported human case was noted in 1981 in Central African Republic in a man with fever and rash [2]. The first human case in Europe was reported in 2009 from Italy and involved a woman with meningoencephalitis [18]. Subsequent studies in humans revealed low seroprevalence to USUV in Germany and Italy [15]. Seroconversion or USUV isolations were reported in birds in many European countries since 2001 [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Retrospective analysis of material from Italian wild birds found dead in 1996 indicate that the virus was already circulating in Europe at that time [30]. In countries bordering Poland, reports about the presence of USUV neutralizing antibodies in birds were reported from Germany [31,32,33] and the Czech Republic [34]. In 2011, the virus was isolated from a blackbird found dead in Brno, and, in 2012, from two other blackbirds in the same area [35].
We investigated the seroprevalence of serum neutralizing antibodies to WNV and USUV in birds and horses in Poland.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Ethics Statement

Clinical specimens from birds were sent to the laboratory for routine diagnosis of viral infections. Horse blood specimens submitted for routine testing for equine viral arteritis were used. Additionally, a part of horse specimens utilized in this investigation was taken during work on other project for which animal ethics clearance for collecting horse blood was obtained from the Wroclaw Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee (No. 43/2011).

2.2. Specimens

Tissue samples from birds and blood from horses and birds were collected during the period of October 2012 to April 2013. Tissue samples (brain, liver, lung, heart, spleen, and kidney) were taken from 30 birds representing 10 bird species (Table 1) which died at the Wild Animal and Bird of Prey Breeding and Protection Center in Wroclaw. They were delivered to the Center from different places throughout Poland. Seven birds developed central nervous system symptoms, e.g., abnormal behavior, tremor, head drop or abnormal body posture. Blood for serological testing was collected from 10 healthy goshawks trapped in the field and from four sick birds treated at the Center (three white-tailed eagles, and one common buzzard). The samples were harvested from animals from Lower Silesian, Greater Poland and Łódź voivodeships.
Horses (n = 411) were bled on different farms throughout Poland. They were aged 1–28 years old, and included mares (n = 251), stallions (n = 96) and geldings (n = 64) representing polish half-bred (n = 74), Arabian (n = 42), thoroughbred (n = 39), Hucul pony (n = 19) Anglo–Arabian (n = 15), Malopolski (n = 26), Wielkopolski (n = 32), Silesian (n = 22), polish coldblood (n = 37) and Fjord half-bred (n = 11) horses. In 94 cases, the breed was unknown. None of the horses were vaccinated against WNV. Although no clinical cases were reported in sampled horses, clinical disease in past is not excluded, because neurological symptoms in horses in Poland are usually diagnosed as equine herpesvirus type 1 (EHV-1) infection or Wobbler syndrome and WNV or USUV infection is not considered [36,37].

2.3. Virus Isolation and Identification

Individual tissue samples from birds were processed using a previously described procedure [38] and inoculated separately (50 µL per well, 8 replicates per sample) into different cell lines: rabbit kidney cells (RK-13, ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA, No CCL-37 TM) and green monkey kidney (Vero, ATCC, No CCL-81 TM) seeded in 96-well polystyrene plates the day before inoculation. Plates were incubated at 37 °C/5% CO2 and observed daily for the development of cytopathic effect up to 10 days for up to five blind passages. Simultaneously,s virus isolation was attempted in embryonated chicken eggs (ECE). Supernatant from cell cultures and allantoic liquid were harvested and tested by hemagglutination assay and a flavivirus generic RT-PCR, using primers FU1 and CFD2 [39].

2.4. Serology

Horse and bird sera were tested for the presence of virus neutralizing antibodies to WNV and USUV using microneutralization procedure as described before [40]. USUV reference isolate SA-AR1776 (South Africa, 1959), Vero passage 4, was used for the USUV neutralization test. The antibody titers were expressed as the reciprocal of the serum dilution inhibiting 100% of viral cytopathic effect. Serum samples with a virus neutralization titer of ≥1:10 were considered positive. IgM serology was performed using the ID Screen West Nile IgM Capture ELISA for equines (IDVet, Grabels, France).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analysis was conducted in PQStat version 1.6.1 (PQ Stat Software, Poznań, Poland), at a significance level of 5% using the following tests: chi-square and the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (Rs), which statistical significance was then tested by Student’s t-test.

3. Results

WNV or USUV Could Not Be Isolated from Any of the Bird Tissue Samples Tested

Virus neutralizing antibodies against WNV were detected in five of the 14 birds tested (35.7%) (Table 1). Of these, three were healthy goshawks: three years old (titer 1:160), one year old (1:80), and 3–4 years old (1:1280). A further two were sick white-tailed eagles: 10 years old (1:20), 4 years old (1:160). Virus neutralizing antibodies against USUV were found in one two years old clinically healthy goshawk (7.14%) (titer 1:10). In one case (one-year-old goshawk), the result could not be concluded since it had neutralizing antibodies against WNV and USUV at the same titer (both 1:10).
Virus neutralizing antibodies to WNV were detected in 62 horses of 411 tested (15.08%). Seropositive horses were found in different voivodeships of Poland (Figure 1, Table 2). Twenty-one of serologically positive horses (33.87%) did not travel outside Polish borders. The remaining horses traveled to Germany (23 horses), Hungary (9), the Netherlands (4), Lithuania (2), Austria (1), France (1), and Slovakia (1).
Antibodies titers in horses ranged from 1:10 to ≥1:1280: 1:10 (n = 2), 1:20 (1), 1:40 (43), 1:80 (1), 1:160 (1) 1:320 (5), 1:640 (4), and ≥1:1280 (5). No WNV IgM antibodies were detected in a subset of 44 horses with confirmed neutralizing antibodies.
Among 411 horse serum samples, 115 (27.98%) were positive for neutralizing antibodies to Usutu virus (Figure 1, Table 2). Sixty-seven of serologically positive horses (58.26%) did not travel outside Polish borders. The travelling horses were in Germany (25 horses), Hungary (6), France (4), Slovakia (4), Austria (3), Italy (3), and the Netherlands (3).
WNV neutralizing antibodies titers in horses ranged from 1:10 to 1:640: 1:10 (n = 12), 1:20 (33), 1:40 (29), 1:80 (25), 1:160 (10) 1:320 (4), and 1:640 (3).
In most WNV antibody-positive animals, the USUV titers were negative (virus neutralization titer < 1:10) or significantly lower (0n average two-fold lower) than the corresponding WNV neutralization titers.
In seven horses, the result was positive for both WNV and USUV. One of them (19-year-old mare, titer 1:40) did not travel outside Polish borders. The remaining horses (10-, 13-, 14- and 18-year-old four mares, one one-year-old stallion, and one three-year-old gelding) traveled to Germany (2 horses), Austria (2), Hungary (1) and France (1). The antibody titers reached between 1:10 and 1:40.
Due to the nominal nature of the data, the chi-square test was used to assess the relationship between gender and the WNV or USUV seropositivity, and then between the breed and the WNV or USUV seropositivity. The results showed no significant correlation between gender and the WNV (p = 0.212) or USUV (p = 0.127) seropositivity and no significant correlation between the breed and the WNV (p = 0.861) or USUV (p = 0.854) seropositivity.
The association between WNV and USUV seropositivity in individual voivodeships (Table 2) was analyzed using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (Rs). The results showed no significant correlation between these parameters (p = 0.931).
Due to the not normal distribution of data, to assess the association between the age and the WNV or USUV (Table 3) seropositivity, we also used the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (Rs), the statistical significance of which was then tested by Student’s t-test. The correlation coefficient was Rs = −0.520 for WNV (Figure 2) and Rs = −0.664 for USUV (Figure 3), which shows a moderate negative correlation between the age and seropositivity. The negative association between age and seropositivity was statistically significant (p = 0.005 and p < 0.001 respectively).

4. Discussion

Earlier studies conducted in Poland showed anti-WNV antibodies in 12.1% of house sparrows and in 2.8% of Eurasian tree sparrows [41], as well as in five out of 97 wild birds (three storks, one crow and one mute swan) [13]. Serosurveys in horses have so far yielded either negative results [13] or a very low level of seropositivity, below 1% [3,14]. In contrast to earlier findings, we demonstrate much higher anti-WNV seroprevalence in both horses (15.08%), and birds (35.7%). Forty-one (66.12%) of the 62 seropositive horses in this study have travelled outside Poland. Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that these animals were infected with WNV while travelling outside Polish borders. On the other hand, of 21 VNT seropositive horses without travel history, some animals from different geographic location had very high anti-WNV antibody titers, indicating wide spread local exposure to the virus. Compared to previously published results, the much higher seroprevalence in Polish horses detected in our study might be due to a wider collection of horse sera across the country or it might indicate that in recent years more local horses have been exposed to WNV.
Analysing the percentage of WNV seropositive horses in individual voivodeships, the highest results were observed in Podlaskie (100%) and Lubusz (33.33%), but, considering the strength of these groups (1 and 6, respectively), we cannot assume that virus is highly prevalent in these territories. On the other hand, the high ratio in Greater Poland (24.85%), where many horses were tested, may partially come from the fact that many animals from this group travelled abroad. In the case of USUV infection, the high rate was observed in Greater Poland (40.67%) and Lower Silesia (20.13%), where many horses do not move outside Poland. It may indicate that virus circulates in these regions.
A negative association was observed between the age and WNV seropositivity. In the seropositive group of animals that travelled abroad, horses aged 2–13 years old were most represented. Younger horses travel more often to participate in competitions or exhibitions, during which they might be exposed to WNV abroad. Considering the age of horses that did not travel outside Poland, a slightly higher percentage of seropositive individuals was observed in older horses, 16, 21 and 23-year olds (11.11–14.28%).
Considering only animals which did not traveled abroad, the obtained results indicate similar percentage of seropositive horses regardless of gender. In the case of breed, this proportion is also similar (4.55–7.69%) except for Wielkopolski breed, where it is higher (21.88%).
The WNV seroprevalence rate in horses reported in this study is similar or higher than in neighboring countries. For example, in Slovak Republic, the reported seropositivity was 8.3% in 2008–2011, 4.8% in 2012 and 0% in 2013 [42,43]. However, a higher proportion of seropositive horses (13.5%) was detected in 2010–2011 in Ukraine [44].
Antibodies to WNV in birds have been found for over 20 years in Poland [41]. In 2015, Niczyporuk et al. detected VNV antibodies in 13.29% of birds tested [14]. Although we tested relatively small number of birds, our results further confirm circulation of WNV in Polish bird population. Our study included mostly raptor birds and we detected WNV neutralizing antibodies in goshawks and white-tailed eagles. This result is in contrast to the recent study where all the birds with neutralizing antibodies were non-raptors (storks and chaffinches) while raptors were negative [14]. In the case of raptors species, only juveniles migrate whilst looking for a nest site. Adults are sedentary and the highest titers of antibodies against WNV were found in 3–4-year-old birds. In Belarus and Germany, the percentage of WNV-seropositive birds was 6.5–16.7% and 4.6%, respectively [45,46]. The seroprevalence rate in this study was higher and comparable to results obtained in Austria (38.7%) [47].
The high VNV seropositivity found in our study suggests active circulation of the virus in local horse and bird populations. This situation highlights a potential risk for WNV outbreak, including zoonotic transmission to humans. While seroepidemiological data on WNV infection in humans in Poland are limited [48], it is rather worrying that a study conducted in 2015 in Podlaskie voivodeship showed high percentage (33.33%) of patients with meningitis and lymphocytic meningitis to be positive for WNV antigen [14].
We detected anti-USUV neutralizing antibody in one out of 14 goshawks tested. However, his is a second confirmation of USUV seropositivity in birds in Poland. Our study included a very limited number of birds, thus the determination of the extend of USUV infection/transmission in birds in Poland requires further investigations. There is growing evidence for USUV circulation in many bird species throughout European countries [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,49].
There are very few reports on USUV infection in horses. In 2013, in Croatia, USUV neutralizing antibodies were detected in two of 69 WNV ELISA-reactive horse serum samples [50] and, in Serbia, in 2011, in one of 349 horses tested [51]. Of 172 horses sampled between 2011 and 2012 on the Island of Mallorca (Spain), 1.2% was seropositive for antibodies against USUV [52]. In Italy, the percentage of USUV seropositive horses was 89.2% in 2008 but only 7.8% in 2009 [53].
Our findings suggest a high seroprevalence of anti-USUV neutralizing antibodies in horses in Poland (27.98%) Admittedly, some of these horses (n = 48) travelled to countries in which USUV infection has been confirmed, but most of the seropositive animals (n = 67) did not travel outside Polish borders.
Since horses appear to be good sentinel animals to monitor USUV circulation [53], our results might indicate that this virus is actively circulating in Poland.
Given the high abundance of different mosquito species from the Culicidae family in Poland [54], relatively high population of horses [55], the presence of different bird species, including those migrating between WNV or USUV endemic regions [56] and the results of this study, it is necessary to implement control programs to monitor and prevent WNV and USUV spread and to improve public health awareness of these viruses transmission, and the potentially severe infection these viruses might cause in humans.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by The Wild Animal and Bird of Prey Breeding and Protection Center (ZYS Foundation).

Author Contributions

Barbara Bażanów and Janusz T. Pawęska conceived and designed the experiments; Barbara Bażanów, Janusz T. Pawęska and Petrus Jansen van Vuren performed the experiments; Barbara Bażanów, Janusz T. Pawęska, Petrus Jansen van Vuren, Dominika Stygar and Agnieszka Frącka analyzed the data and wrote the paper; Piotr Szymański, Jan Twardoń and Roland Kozdrowski contributed reagents/materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Di Sabatino, D.; Bruno, R.; Sauro, F.; Danzetta, M.L.; Cito, F.; Iannetti, S.; Narcisi, V.; De Massis, F.; Calistri, P. Epidemiology of West Nile Disease in Europe and in the Mediterranean Basin from 2009 to 2013. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ashraf, U.; Ye, J.; Ruan, X.; Wan, S.; Zhu, B.; Cao, S. Usutu Virus: An Emerging Flavivirus in Europe. Viruses 2015, 7, 219–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Golnik, W.; Bażanów, B.; Florek, M.; Pawęska, J. Prevalence of equine arteritis and West Nile virus—Specific antibodies in thoroughbred horses in Poland. Ann. UMCS Sect. DDD 2008, 26, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Greene, S.E.; Reid, A. West Nile Virus. (American Society for Microbiology 2013. FAQ). Available online: https://microbewiki.kenyon.edu/index.php/West_Nile_Virus_in_Birds (accessed on 16 April 2016).
  5. Rappole, J.H.; Hubálek, Z. Migratory birds and West Nile virus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 94, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ludolfs, D.; Niedrig, M.; Paweska, J.T.; Schmitz, H. Reverse ELISA for the detection of anti West Nile virus IgG antibodies in humans. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2007, 26, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Venter, M.; Burt, F.J.; Blumberg, L.; Fickl, H.; Paweska, J.; Swanepoel, R. Cytokine induction after laboratory acquired West Nile Virus infection. N. Eng. J. Med. 2009, 360, 1260–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Venter, M.; Human, S.; Zaayman, D.; Gerdes, G.H.; Williams, J.; Steyl, J.; Leman, P.A.; Paweska, J.T.; Setzkorn, H.; Rous, G.; et al. Lineage 2 West Nile virus as a cause of fatal neurological disease in horses, South Africa. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009, 15, 877–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Venter, M.; Steyl, J.; Human, S.; Weyer, J.; Zaayman, D.; Blumberg, L.; Leman, P.; Paweska, J.; Swanepoel, R. Transmission of West Nile virus during horse autopsy. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2010, 16, 573–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Campbell, G.L.; Marfin, A.A.; Lanciotti, R.S.; Gubler, D.J. West Nile virus. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2002, 2, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Komar, N.; Langevin, S.; Hinten, S.; Nemeth, N.; Edwards, E.; Hettler, D.; Davis, B.; Bowen, R.; Bunning, M. Experimental infection of North American birds with the New York 1999 strain of West Nile virus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2003, 9, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Niczyporuk, J.S.; Samorek-Salomonowicz, E.; Kozdruń, W.; Mizak, Z. The survey of wild birds for West Nile virus in Poland. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2011, 14, 573–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hubálek, Z.; Wegner, E.; Halouzka, J.; Tryjanowski, P.; Jerzak, L.; Sikutová, S.; Rudolf, I.; Kruszewicz, A.G.; Jaworski, Z.; Wlodarczyk, R. Serologic survey of potential vertebrate hosts for West Nile virus in Poland. Viral Immunol. 2008, 21, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Niczyporuk, J.S.; Samorek-Salamonowicz, E.; Lecollinet, S.; Pancewicz, S.A.; Kozdruń, W.; Czekaj, H. Occurrence of West Nile virus antibodies in wild birds, horses, and humans in Poland. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 234181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Vázquez, A.; Jiménez-Clavero, M.A.; Franco, L.; Donoso-Mantke, O.; Sambri, V.; Niedrig, M.; Zeller, H.; Tenorio, A. Usutu virus–potential risk of human disease in Europe. Eurosurveillance 2011, 16, e19935. [Google Scholar]
  16. Moniuszko-Malinowska, A.; Czupryna, P.; Dunaj, J.; Zajkowska, J.; Siemieniako, A.; Pancewicz, S. West Nile virus and Usutu—A threat to Poland. Przegl. Epidemiol. 2016, 70, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Epp, T.; Waldner, C.; West, K.; Townsend, H. Factors associated with West Nile virus disease fatalities in horses. Can. Vet. J. 2007, 48, 1137–1145. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Pecorari, M.; Longo, G.; Gennari, W.; Grottola, A.; Sabbatini, A.; Tagliazucchi, S.; Savini, G.; Monaco, F.; Simone, M.; Lelli, R.; et al. First human case of Usutu virus neuroinvasive infection, Italy, August–September 2009. Eurosurveillance 2009, 14, 19446. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Weissenböck, H.; Kolodziejek, J.; Url, A.; Lussy, H.; Rebel-Bauder, B.; Nowotny, N. Emergence of Usutu virus, an African mosquito-borne flavivirus of the Japanese encephalitis virus group, central Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2002, 8, 652–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Buckley, A.; Dawson, A.; Moss, S.R.; Hinsley, S.A.; Bellamy, P.E.; Gould, E.A. Serological evidence of West Nile virus, Usutu virus and Sindbis virus infection of birds in the UK. J. Gen. Virol. 2003, 84, 2807–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Buckley, A.; Dawson, A.; Gould, E.A. Detection of seroconversion to West Nile virus, Usutu virus and Sindbis virus in UK sentinel chickens. Virol. J. 2006, 3, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Rizzoli, A.; Rosa, R.; Rosso, F.; Buckley, A.; Gould, E. West Nile virus circulation detected in northern Italy in sentinel chickens. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2007, 7, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lelli, R.; Savini, G.; Teodori, L.; Filipponi, G.; Di Gennaro, A.; Leone, A.; Di Gialleonardo, L.; Venturi, L.; Caporale, V. Serological evidence of USUTU virus occurrence in north-eastern Italy. Zoonoses Public Health 2008, 55, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Llopis, I.V.; Rossi, L.; Di Gennaro, A.; Mosca, A.; Teodori, L.; Tomassone, L.; Grego, E.; Monaco, F.; Lorusso, A.; Savini, G. Further circulation of West Nile and Usutu viruses in wild birds in Italy. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2015, 32, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Vittecoq, M.; Lecollinet, S.; Jourdain, E.; Thomas, F.; Blanchon, T.; Arnal, A.; Lowenski, S.; Gauthier-Clerc, M. Recent circulation of West Nile virus and potentially other closely related flaviviruses in Southern France. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2013, 13, 610–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Petrović, T.; Blazquez, A.B.; Lupulović, D.; Lazić, G.; Escribano-Romero, E.; Fabijan, D.; Kapetanov, M.; Lazić, S.; Saiz, J. Monitoring West Nile virus (WNV) infection in wild birds in Serbia during 2012: First isolation and characterization of WNV strains from Serbia. Eurosurveillance 2013, 18, 20622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chaintoutis, S.C.; Dovas, C.I.; Papanastassopoulou, M.; Gewehr, S.; Danis, K.; Beck, C.; Lecollinet, S.; Antalis, V.; Kalaitzopoulou, S.; Panagiotopoulos, T.; et al. Evaluation of a West Nile virus suirvellance and early warning system in Greece, based on domestic pigeons. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014, 37, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Engel, D.; Jost, H.; Wink, M.; Börstler, J.; Bosch, S.; Garigliany, M.M.; Jöst, A.; Czajka, C.; Lühken, R.; Ziegler, U.; et al. Reconstruction of the Evolutionary History and Dispersal of Usutu Virus, a Neglected Emerging Arbovirus in Europe and Africa. MBio 2016, 7, e01938-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Meister, T.; Lussy, H.; Bakonyi, T.; Šikutová, S.; Rudolf, I.; Vogl, W.; Winkler, H.; Frey, H.; Hubálek, Z.; Nowotny, N.; et al. Serological evidence of continuing high Usutu virus (Flaviviridae) activity and establishment of herd immunity in wild birds in Austria. Vet. Microbiol. 2008, 127, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Weissenböck, H.; Bakonyi, T.; Rossi, G.; Mani, P.; Nowotny, N. Usutu virus, Italy, 1996. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 274–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Alsaleh, K.; Khou, C.; Frenkiel, M.P.; Lecollinet, S.; Vàzquez, A.; de Arellano, E.R.; Després, P.; Pardigon, N. The E glycoprotein plays an essential role in the high pathogenicity of European-Mediterranean IS98 strain of West Nile virus. Virology 2016, 492, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ziegler, U.; Jöst, H.; Müller, K.; Fischer, D.; Rinder, M.; Tietze, D.T.; Danner, K.J.; Becker, N.; Skuballa, J.; Hamann, H.P.; et al. Epidemic Spread of Usutu Virus in Southwest Germany in 2011 to 2013 and Monitoring of Wild Birds for Usutu and West Nile Viruses. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2015, 15, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Becker, N.; Jost, H.; Ziegler, U.; Eiden, M.; Höper, D.; Emmerich, P.; Fichet-Calvet, E.; Ehichioya, D.U.; Czajka, C.; Gabriel, M.; et al. Epizootic emergence of Usutu virus in wild and captive birds in Germany. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e32604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hubálek, Z.; Halouzka, J.; Juricová, Z.; Sikutová, S.; Rudolf, I.; Honza, M.; Janková, J.; Chytil, J.; Marec, F.; Sitko, J. Serologic survey of birds for West Nile flavivirus in southern Moravia (Czech Republic). Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008, 8, 659–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hubálek, Z.; Rudolf, I.; Čapek, M.; Bakonyi, T.; Betášová, L.; Nowotny, N. Usutu virus in blackbirds (Turdus merula), Czech Republic, 2011–2012. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2012, 61, 273–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bażanów, B.; Jackulak, N.; Florek, M.; Staroniewicz, Z. Equid Herpesvirus-Associated Abortion in Poland between 1977–2010. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2012, 32, 747–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Stasiak, K.; Rola, J.; Ploszay, G.; Socha, W.; Zmudzinski, J.F. Detection of the neuropathogenic variant of equine herpesvirus 1 associated with abortions in mares in Poland. BMC Vet. Res. 2015, 11, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Timoney, J.; Gillespie, J.H.; Scott, F.W.; Barlough, J.E. Laboratory Diagnosis of Viral Infection in Hagan and Bruner’s Microbiology and Infectious Diseases of Domestic Animals, 8th ed.; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1988; pp. 467–468. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kuno, G.; Chang, G.-J.J.; Tsuchiya, K.R.; Karabatsos, N.; Cropp, C.B. Phylogeny of the genus flavivirus. J. Virol. 1998, 72, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Pearce, M.C.; Venter, M.; Schouwstra, T.; Van Eeden, C.; Jansen van Vuren, P.; Paweska, J.T.; Liu, B.; du Plessis, A. Serum neutralizing antibody response of seronegative horses against lineage 1 and lineage 2 West Nile virus following vaccination with an inactivated lineage 1 West Nile virus vaccine. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 2013, 84, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Juricova, Z.; Pinowski, J.; Literak, I.; Hahm, K.H.; Romanowski, J. Antibodies to alphavirus, flavivirus, and bunyavirus arboviruses in house sparrows (Passer domesticus) and tree sparrows (Passermontanus) in Poland. Avian Dis. 1998, 42, 182–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hubalek, Z.; Ludvikova, E.; Jahn, P.; Treml, F.; Rudolf, I.; Svobodova, P.; Sikutova, S.; Betasova, L.; Bires, J.; Mojzis, M.; et al. West Nile virus equine serosurvey in the Czech and Slovak Republics. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2013, 13, 733–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Csank, T.; Bhide, K.; Bencurova, E.; Dolinska, S.; Drzewniokova, P.; Major, P.; Korytar, L.; Bockova, E.; Bhide, M.; Pistl, J. Detection of West Nile virus and tick-borne encephalitis virus in birds in Slovakia, using a universal primer set. Arch. Virol. 2016, 161, 1679–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ziegler, U.; Skrypnyk, A.; Keller, M.; Staubach, C.; Bezymennyi, M.; Damiani, A.M.; Osterrieder, N.; Groschup, M.H. West Nile Virus Antibody Prevalence in Horses of Ukraine. Viruses 2013, 5, 2469–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ziegler, U.; Seidowski, D.; Angenvoort, J.; Eiden, M.; Muller, K.; Nowotny, N.; Groschup, M.H. Monitoring of West Nile Virus Infections in Germany. Zoonoses Public Health 2012, 59, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Samoilova, T.I.; Votiakov, V.I.; Titov, L.P. Virologic and serologic investigations of West Nile virus circulation in Belarus. Cent. Eur. J. Public Health 2003, 11, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Wodak, E.; Richter, S.; Bago, Z.; Revilla-Fernandez, S.; Weissenbock, H.; Nowotny, N.; Winter, P. Detection and molecular analysis of West Nile virus infections in birds of prey in the eastern part of Austria in 2008 and 2009. Vet. Microbiol. 2011, 149, 358–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Hermanowska-Szpakowicz, T.; Grygorczuk, S.; Kondrusik, M.; Zajkowska, J.; Pancewicz, S. Infections caused by West Nile virus. Przegl. Epidemiol. 2006, 60, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Saiz, J.C.; Blazquez, A.B. Usutu virus: Current knowledge and future perspectives. Virus Adapt. Treat. 2017, 9, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Barbic, L.; Vilibic-Cavlek, T.; Listes, E.; Stevanovic, V.; Gjenero-Margan, I.; Ljubin-Sternak, S.; Pem-Novosel, I.; Listes, I.; Mlinaric-Galinovic, G.; di Gennaro, A.; et al. Demonstration of Usutu Virus Antibodies in Horses, Croatia. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2013, 13, 772–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Lupulovic, D.; Martín-Acebes, M.A.; Lazic, S.; Alonso-Padilla, J.; Blázquez, A.B.; Escribano-Romero, E.; Petrovic, T.; Saiz, J.C. First serological evidence of West Nile virus activity in horses in Serbia. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011, 11, 1303–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Simpson, D.I. The susceptibility of Arvicanthis abyssinicus (Ruppell) to infection with various arboviruses. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1966, 60, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Savini, G.; Monaco, F.; Terregino, C.; Di Gennaro, A.; Bano, L.; Pinoni, C.; De Nardi, R.; Bonilauri, P.; Pecorari, M.; Di Gialleonardo, L.; et al. Usutu virus in Italy: An emergence or a silent infection? Vet. Microbiol. 2011, 15, 264–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kubica-Biemat, B. Distribution of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Poland. Eur. Mosq. Bull. 1999, 5, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  55. CBDK, Centralna Baza Danych Koniowatych—Central Equine Database. Available online: http://cbdk.pl/liczba-koniowatych-2013/ (accessed on 10 January 2014).
  56. Avibase—The World Bird Database. Available online: http://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/checklist.jsp?region=PL (accessed on 24 June 2003).
Viruses 10 00087 g001 550
Figure 1. Geographic distribution of WNV and USUV seropositive horses. Viruses 10 00087 i001 Site and number of sera collected; Viruses 10 00087 i002 USUV positive serum samples; Viruses 10 00087 i003 WNV positive serum samples; Viruses 10 00087 i004 USUV/WNV positive serum samples.
Figure 1. Geographic distribution of WNV and USUV seropositive horses. Viruses 10 00087 i001 Site and number of sera collected; Viruses 10 00087 i002 USUV positive serum samples; Viruses 10 00087 i003 WNV positive serum samples; Viruses 10 00087 i004 USUV/WNV positive serum samples.
Viruses 10 00087 g001
Viruses 10 00087 g002 550
Figure 2. The association between the age and the WNV seropositivity.
Figure 2. The association between the age and the WNV seropositivity.
Viruses 10 00087 g002
Viruses 10 00087 g003 550
Figure 3. The association between the age and USUV seropositivity.
Figure 3. The association between the age and USUV seropositivity.
Viruses 10 00087 g003
Table
Table 1. Virological and serological results in birds.
Table 1. Virological and serological results in birds.
Common NameScientific NameVirus Isolation aSerology No. Tested/No. Positive
No. Tested/No. Positive WNV/No. Positive USUVWNVUSUVWNV/USUV
White-tailed eagleHaliaeetus albicilla10/0/03/23/03/0
Common buzzardButeo buteo6/0/01/01/01/0
GoshawkAccipiter gentilis1/0/010/310/110/1
Peregrine falconFalco peregrines1/0/0n.t.n.t.n.t.
CapercailliesTetrao urogallus4/0/0n.t.n.t.n.t.
Mute swanCygnus olor4/0/0n.t.n.t.n.t.
Saker falconFalco cherrug1/0/0n.t.n.t.n.t.
Crossbreed peregrine falcon/gyr falconFalco peregrinus/Falco rusticolus1/0/0n.t.n.t.n.t.
European herring gulLarus argentatus1/0/0n.t.n.t.n.t.
MallardAnas platyrhynchos1/0/0n.t.n.t.n.t.
a Virus isolation was attempted from brain, liver, lung, heart, spleen, and kidney tissues. n.t., not tested; WNV, West Nile virus; USUV, Usutu virus.
Table
Table 2. WNV and USUV seropositivity in individual voivodeships.
Table 2. WNV and USUV seropositivity in individual voivodeships.
VoivodeshipNo. TestedNo. Positive (% Positive)
Horses Which Do Not Move Outside PolandTravelling HorsesTotal
Masovian21WNV 5 (23.80)0 (0.00)5 (23.80)
USUV 2 (9.52)3 (14.28)5 (23.80)
Podlaskie1WNV0 (0.00)1 (100.00)1 (100.00)
USUV 0 (0.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)
Subcarpathian11WNV 0 (0.00)1 (9.09)1 (9.09)
USUV 1 (9.09)0 (0.00)1 (9.09)
Świętokrzyskie13WNV 0 (0.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)
USUV 2 (15.38)2 (15.38)4 (30.76)
Silesian9WNV 0 (0.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)
USUV 0 (0.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)
Łódź2WNV 0 (0.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)
USUV 0 (0.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)
Kuyavian-Pomeranian22WNV 4 (18.18)0 (0.00)4 (18.18)
USUV 3 (13.63)0 (0.00)3 (13.63)
Greater Poland177WNV 7 (3.95)37 (20.90)44 (24.85)
USUV 40 (22.59)32 (18.07)72 (40.67)
WNV/USUV1 (0.56)3 (1.69)4 (2.25)
Lower Silesian149WNV 3 (2.01)2 (1.34)5 (3.35)
USUV 19 (12.75)11 (7.38)30 (20.13)
WNV/USUV (0.00)3 (2.01)3 (2.01)
Lubusz6WNV 2 (33.33)0 (0.00)2 (33.33)
USUV 0 (0.00)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)
Table
Table 3. Age of horses tested for WNV and USUV neutralizing antibodies.
Table 3. Age of horses tested for WNV and USUV neutralizing antibodies.
Age (yrs)No. TestedNo. Positive (%)
Horses Which Do Not Move Outside PolandTravelling HorsesTotal
1–352WNV 6 (11.53) USUV 7 (13.46)6 (11.53)12 (23.07)
8 (15.38)15 (28.84)
4–643WNV 1 (2.32) USUV 9 (20.93)7 (16.27)8 (18.60)
8 (18.60)17 (39.53)
7–938WNV 1 (2.63) USUV 13 (34.21)5 (13.15)6 (15.78)
12 (31.57)25 (65.78)
10–1268WNV 4 (5.88) USUV 16 (23.52)9 (13.23)13 (19.11)
6 (8.82)22 (32.35)
13–1550WNV 4 (8.00) USUV 11 (22.00)6 (12.00)10 (20.00)
6 (12.00)17 (34.00)
>15160WNV 5 (3.12) USUV 11 (6.87)8 (5.00)13 (8.12)
8 (5.00)19 (11.87)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bażanów, B.; Jansen van Vuren, P.; Szymański, P.; Stygar, D.; Frącka, A.; Twardoń, J.; Kozdrowski, R.; Pawęska, J.T. A Survey on West Nile and Usutu Viruses in Horses and Birds in Poland. Viruses 2018, 10, 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/v10020087

AMA Style

Bażanów B, Jansen van Vuren P, Szymański P, Stygar D, Frącka A, Twardoń J, Kozdrowski R, Pawęska JT. A Survey on West Nile and Usutu Viruses in Horses and Birds in Poland. Viruses. 2018; 10(2):87. https://doi.org/10.3390/v10020087

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bażanów, Barbara, Petrus Jansen van Vuren, Piotr Szymański, Dominika Stygar, Agnieszka Frącka, Jan Twardoń, Roland Kozdrowski, and Janusz T. Pawęska. 2018. "A Survey on West Nile and Usutu Viruses in Horses and Birds in Poland" Viruses 10, no. 2: 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/v10020087

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop