Next Article in Journal
Hantaviruses in the Americas and Their Role as Emerging Pathogens
Previous Article in Journal
Mind the Gap: How Some Viruses Infect Their Hosts
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inhibition of the Type I Interferon Antiviral Response During Arenavirus Infection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 2
Issue 11
10.3390/v2112541
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Buying Time—The Immune System Determinants of the Incubation Period to Respiratory Viruses

by
Tamar Hermesh
1,†,
Bruno Moltedo
1,†,
Carolina B. López
1,2 and
Thomas M. Moran
1,*
1
Department of Microbiology and Immunology Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA
2
Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Viruses 2010, 2(11), 2541-2558; https://doi.org/10.3390/v2112541
Submission received: 22 October 2010 / Revised: 1 November 2010 / Accepted: 2 November 2010 / Published: 18 November 2010
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interferon Antiviral Response and Viral Evasion)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Respiratory viruses cause disease in humans characterized by an abrupt onset of symptoms. Studies in humans and animal models have shown that symptoms are not immediate and appear days or even weeks after infection. Since the initial symptoms are a manifestation of virus recognition by elements of the innate immune response, early virus replication must go largely undetected. The interval between infection and the emergence of symptoms is called the incubation period and is widely used as a clinical score. While incubation periods have been described for many virus infections the underlying mechanism for this asymptomatic phase has not been comprehensively documented. Here we review studies of the interaction between human pathogenic respiratory RNA viruses and the host with a particular emphasis on the mechanisms used by viruses to inhibit immunity. We discuss the concept of the “stealth phase”, defined as the time between infection and the earliest detectable inflammatory response. We propose that the “stealth phase” phenomenon is primarily responsible for the suppression of symptoms during the incubation period and results from viral antagonism that inhibits major pathways of the innate immune system allowing an extended time of unhindered virus replication.

1. Introduction

The incubation period is a common feature of infection by pathogenic viruses. It is defined as the time between infection by a pathogen and the onset of symptoms. Determining the incubation periods of different pathogens assists health authorities control and track the progress of an infectious disease, thus limiting the spread of the pathogen and a possible epidemic. The length of the incubation period varies according to the infectious agent, the host immunological fitness, and previous immunological experience. In humans, it is difficult to determine the length of the incubation period since the exact time of infection is usually unknown. A thorough review of the literature by Lessler et al. [1] showed that the reported incubation periods for human respiratory viruses ranges from around two days for influenza and human rhinovirus (HRV) to 10 days or more for measles virus (MeV).

2. Termination of the Incubation Period—Onset of Symptoms is Mediated by the Immune Response

The abrupt onset of symptoms following infection with respiratory viruses marks the termination of the incubation period. Flu-like symptoms are varied and described by patients as fever and chills, malaise, myalgia, sneezing, cough, runny nose, sinus pain, congestion, headache and others [2,3]. These symptoms are associated with the secretion of type I interferons (IFNs), interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 8 (IL-8), interleukin 1 (IL-1), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), macrophage inflammatory protein-1β (MIP-1β), interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and other cytokines [4,5,6].
While some of the symptoms may be directly related to the virus’ cytopathic effect (shedding of damaged epithelium can lead to airway obstruction), most of the symptoms during influenza, MeV and HRV infections are the result of the immune response to the infection [7]. The cause of the symptoms following respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection is controversial and it appears that both direct virus infection and the immune response play a role [8,9].
Cytokines are usually observed prior to tissue damage generated by cytotoxic T cells or direct tissue damage caused by the virus infection. Patients treated with type I IFN, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-1α or IL-6 for various illnesses report many flu-like symptoms without actually presenting with a respiratory virus infection [10,11,12,13,14]. An example of the immune system’s contribution to the flu-like symptoms is the fact that administration of TNF-α or type I IFNs can cause headaches [10,11,13].
Fever is mediated by the cytokines mentioned above, mainly IL-1, and is one of the best-understood interactions between the immune system and the nervous system. Although some aspects of the relay signals are unknown, it is largely thought that these cytokines signal the hypothalamus via the peripheral nervous system to increase the thermal set point [15,16,17,18]. Other symptoms also result from the cross talk of the immune system with the nervous system. Sneezing is mediated by the trigeminal nerve. This signal is relayed to the brain stem in response to histamines secreted by leukocytes [19,20]. Coughing is mediated by the vagus nerves below the larynx and results from an inflammatory response in the lower respiratory tract [15,21,22].
Nasal discharge (rhinorrhoea) is a combination of goblet cell secretion, gland secretion, plasma exudate, and contains dead leukocytes such as monocytes and neutrophils. The observed color change (from yellow to green) is due to the granule content of these cells [23,24].
Many other cytokines, chemokines and growth factors are present at elevated levels in the virus-infected lung and in the serum, demonstrating similar kinetics to the above-mentioned cytokines. The cellular sources of these cytokines are still not completely known but both epithelial and hematopoietic cells are involved.

3. Cellular Sensors for Viral Recognition

Before an anti-viral response can take place in infected cells or cells that have been exposed to viral components, viral presence must be sensed. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), Retinoic acid inducible gene I (RIG-I) like receptors (RLRs) and the inflammasome complex take part in this process.

3.1. The TLR System

Specialized TLRs for viral sensing are TLR-3 that recognizes dsRNA and localizes to the plasma membrane or endosome [25,26]. The endosomal TLR-7 and TLR-8 recognize viral single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) [27,28]. TLR-9 recognizes unmethylated CpG DNA of bacteria and viruses [29,30]. Some evidence suggests that TLR-4, TLR-6 and TLR-2 play a role in recognition of RSV [31,32] while MeV hemagglutinin is recognized by TLR-2 [33] (Figure 1).

3.2. The RLR System

The cytosolic mediators of viral sensing, the RLRs, include the RIG-I and melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5). RIG-I is activated by ssRNA or 5'-triphosphate double stranded RNA (dsRNA) and MDA5 by dsRNA [34,35,36]. Both MDA5 and RIGI signal through the mitochondrial-associated protein known as interferon beta promoter stimulator-1 (IPS-1) [36,37,38,39,40] (Figure 1). The role of a third member of the RLR family, the RNA helicase Lgp2, is less understood. Lgp2 has been implicated both as a negative and positive regulator of MDA5 and RIG-I function [41,42,43].

3.3. Nod-like Receptor (NLRP3) Inflammasome

The inflammasome is a protein complex composed of a number of proteins, among them caspase-1 and different Nod-like receptors (NLR)s. The main inflammasome complex involved in the response to the RNA viruses discussed in this review is NLRP3.
The inflammasome complex is required to generate the active form of the cytokines IL-1β, IL-18 and IL-33. The production of these cytokines requires two signals. Signal one is given by recognition of viral RNA as described above. This leads to increased levels of cytokines mRNA. Signal two activates the inflammasome and is sensed by NLRP3. NLRP3 is activated after exposure to ATP, dsRNA, poly I:C and various crystals such as monosodium urate [44,45,46,47].In order to produce activated cytokines, pro-IL-1β, pro-IL-18 and pro-IL-33 must be cleaved by caspase-1. Caspase-1 is part of the inflammasome complex that contains NLRP3 and the adapter apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD (ASC) [48]. It has been shown that the NLRP3 inflammasome is required for the production of IL-1β and IL-18 during influenza infection in vivo [49]. It remains unclear whether the inflammasome physically senses these compounds. Recently it was suggested that influenza virus M2, an ion channel, causes changes in ionic concentration in cellular compartments which lead to NLRP3 activation [50].

4. Production and Signaling of Type I and III IFNs in Response to Virus Infection

The first indication of an immune response to virus infection is the secretion of type I IFNs. Type I IFNs belong to a family of cytokines consisting of one subtype of IFN-β, 13 subtypes of IFN-α and also IFN-ω, IFN-κ, IFN-ε and IFN-ν. Type III IFNs (IFN-λ) are also produced quickly after infection, and although their function and regulation is less studied than that of type I IFNs, they share similar functions. The existence of multiple IFN-α genes and the fact that virtually all viruses encode proteins that antagonize the production or response to type I IFNs emphasizes their importance during the anti-viral immune response. As we will discuss in more detail later in this review, type I IFNs secretion is delayed in vivo until a few days after infection and is coincident with the end of the incubation period.

4.1. Transcriptional Regulation of Type I IFNs

The transcriptional regulation of type I IFNs has been comprehensively reviewed [51]. In short, IFN-β is the first type I IFN to be induced following viral recognition. Transcription of IFN-β mRNA requires binding of three groups of transcription factors to the regulatory domain of the IFN promoter; NFκB, activating transcription factor 2 (ATF2)/c-Jun and interferon regulatory factors 3 and 7 (IRF-3 and IRF-7). The activation of all these factors in response to virus infection is induced by triggering either the RLR or TLR systems (Figure 1).

4.2. Type I IFNs Signaling

Type I IFNs signaling through its receptor leads to transcription of many interferon responsive genes (ISGs) that limit the virus replication and enhance the immune response. Secreted type I IFNs signal through the IFN-α/β receptor complex (IFNAR), composed of two transmembrane protein subunits, IFNAR1 and IFNAR2, which are present on the surface of every nucleated cell. Sensing of type I IFNs can enhance the production of type I IFNs and other inflammatory cytokines [52,53]. The dimerization of the two subunits of the IFNAR with IFN-α or IFN-β leads to activation of the intracellular kinases Jak1 and Tyk2, which phosphorylate the STAT transcription factors leading to the generation of STAT homodimers (STAT1) and heterodimers (STAT1 with STAT2). Phosphorylated STAT1 and STAT2, together with IRF-9, form a complex called interferon-stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3) that translocates to the nucleus and activates the transcription of ISGs [54] (Figure 1).

4.3. Type III IFNs

Similarly to type I IFNs, type III IFNs (IFN-λ), which in humans include IL-29, IL-28α and IL-28β, are expressed by many cell types after virus infection or TLR ligand stimulation and have similar effects to those observed with type I IFNs [55,56]. The receptor for IFN-λ (IFN-λR) is composed by one IFN-λR chain and one IL-10Rβ chain. IFN-λR also signals through the JAK-STAT pathway [57,58,59]. Expression of IFN-λR appears to be restricted to non-hematopoietic cells such as epithelial cells.

5. Inhibition of Innate Immunity by Viral Antagonists

Given that mammals have evolved a sophisticated detection and response system to viral infections, viruses have adapted to inhibit the initial recognition by the host’s immune system. Once the anti-viral response is initiated by type I IFNs signaling, it is rapidly amplified, and thus it is of great importance for the virus to delay this response as long as possible.

5.1. Inhibition of Interferon Induction

Viruses have evolved to inhibit IFN induction in a number of ways; the many functions of the influenza A non-structural protein 1 (NS1) have been recently reviewed [60]. Influenza NS1 inhibits RIG-I and IPS-1 signaling by forming a complex with RIG-I and ssRNA [34,61,62,63]. This explains the inhibition of IRF-3, NFκB, and c-Jun/ATF-2 activation observed upon infection with influenza viruses [64,65,66]. In addition, influenza A NS1 blocks virus detection by binding to dsRNA, thereby masking it from detection by RIG-I [67,68]. Influenza NS1 also inhibits the cellular response by interfering with the processing and export of cellular mRNA [69,70].
The paramyxoviruses’ ability to inhibit IFN has been reviewed elsewhere [71]. In brief, Sendai virus (SeV), MeV and Mumps virus (MuV) viruses V protein can block the activation of MDA5 [72,73,74,75]. Several V proteins of paramyxoviruses can inhibit IRF-3 activation [76], for example RSV NS1 and NS2 also block IRF3 activation [77]. RSV NS2 can block type I IFN induction by binding RIG-I and inhibiting downstream signaling [78].
TLR agonists are potent inducers of cytokine production. It is, therefore, surprising that very little evidence exists for inhibition of the TLR signaling pathway by the viruses discussed above. It has been suggested that certain RSV strains and MeV can inhibit type I IFN induction by TLR-7 and TLR-9 signaling. In the case of MeV, the V protein acts as a decoy substrate for the kinase IκB kinase α, competing with IRF7 [79,80,81]. No evidence exists for such inhibition by Influenza, HRV or human parainfluenza virus (hPIV) (Figure 1).

5.2. Inhibition of Type I IFN Signaling

Respiratory paramyxoviruses can inhibit the IFN signaling pathway. The C protein of hPIV1 inhibits the translocation of STAT-1 and STAT-2 to the nucleus and the activation of IRF-3 [82,83], while the C protein of hPIV3 inhibits the phosphorylation of STAT-1 [84]. Some evidence suggests the C protein of MeV acts to inhibit IFN signaling response [85]. The V protein of MeV appears to form complexes with different signaling proteins in the IFN response pathway preventing either nuclear translocation or their phosphorylation [86,87,88,89,90,91]. The NS1 and NS2 proteins of RSV can both block type I IFN and IFN-λ responses [92,93]. It is thought that STAT2 is actually degraded by NS1 and NS2 [94] (Figure 1).
Many of the proteins involved in viral recognition, type I and III IFN induction and type I IFN signaling, such as RIG-I, MDA-5, IRF7, STAT1, etc., are themselves type I IFN inducible genes. By blocking IFN induction and signaling the virus also limits the enhancement of the response to infection.

6. Control of the Length of the Incubation Period in vivo

As discussed above, influenza NS1 inhibits the detection of the virus by the host thereby preventing the production of type I IFNs and other cytokines [95]. The inhibition of type I IFN production is of particular importance, since the sensing of type I IFN by neighboring cells generates an anti-viral state in these cells that limits virus propagation. Studies describing the viral proteins required for respiratory virus antagonism are limited to in vitro experiments, in most cases due to poor replication of antagonist deficient viruses in vivo. While it is difficult to extrapolate these observations to the events taking place during a natural infection, studies of influenza NS1 antagonism in vivo provide a model for respiratory virus inhibition of innate immunity.

6.1. Influenza NS1 Antagonism in vivo

A close examination of an in vivo influenza virus infection in mice showed that the virus replicates in the lung for almost two days without inducing an innate immune response. We defined this period between early, undetected virus infection and the first signs of an immune response as the “stealth phase”. Our group showed that the NS1 protein of influenza is responsible for the “stealth phase” by hampering cytokine production in vivo. Infection with a virus lacking NS1 triggers an immediate vigorous lung inflammation [96]. Two days after infection with an NS1 competent virus, a robust and abrupt immune response is initiated in the infected lungs. This event demarcates the initiation of innate immunity. The lung innate response includes the production of cytokines (e.g., IL-6, TNF-a, type I IFNs, IFN-γ and IL1-α chemokines (e.g., CCL-2, CCL-20 and KC), the recruitment of diverse cells of the immune system, and the migration of dendritic cells (DCs) to the draining lymph nodes leading to the triggering of T cell responses. This abrupt rise of chemokine is responsible for the recruitment of mononuclear phagocytes, granulocytes and other leukocytes to the site of infection. These recruited cells will play a major role in the eventual clearance of the virus.

6.2. Overcoming Viral Antagonism in vivo

Based on several studies, there are a number of possible mechanisms by which the immune system can be stimulated to initiate inflammation.

6.2.1. Cell Death

In an inflamed tissue, the sensing of “danger signals” [97] in the form of factors released from infected necrotic or apoptotic cells may stimulate neighboring cells to produce cytokines and chemoattract other immune cells from the blood [98,99]. Viral RNA released from dying cells may stimulate TLR-7 or TLR-3 upon phagocytosis by plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs), macrophages and other cells culminating in type I IFNs production [100]. The TLR system avoids viral antagonism by rapidly sensing the virus inside endosomal compartments in uninfected phagocytes that culminates in type I IFNs and cytokine production [101,102]

6.2.2. Errors in Virus Replication

Intracellular purine metabolites are released from damaged cells and include uric acid and ATP, which can stimulate the inflammasome complex to cleave pro-IL-1β and intensify the innate response [47,103,104,105,106,107,108,109]. The inflammasome can also activate type I IFNs production [45] and type I IFNs itself can upregulate AIM2, a protein that contains a pyrin motif that is necessary for promoting IL-1β production. IFN-γ is also involved in this signaling cascade since it can upregulate components of the inflammasome complex [110,111].
The natural process by which viruses replicate may contribute to the culmination of the stealth phase. The viral polymerase of many of the viruses discussed here is error-prone. From an evolution or natural selection standpoint, this property has the advantage of promoting rapid mutations in the viral genome, avoiding recognition by the adaptive immune response. However, it is also possible that such a process promotes mistakes in viral replication, such as the generation of mutated, less efficient viral antagonists and defective interfering virus particles (DIs) that may lead to immune recognition. It has been shown in mice that stocks of SeV with high DI content enhance the immune response [112] and MeV vaccine strains induction of type I IFNs correlates with high DI content [113].

6.2.3. Priming by Type I IFNs

In vitro studies show that cells primed with type I IFNs are able to mount an innate response to an infecting virus, despite viral antagonism. Type I IFN signal transduction turns on transcriptional programs within cells that can decrease the inhibitory effects of the viral antagonists upon infection. Not only does the virus replicate poorly in cells primed with type I IFNs, but also primed cells can secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines more efficiently. It is known that pre-exposure of DCs to type I IFNs upregulates costimulatory molecules and major histocompatibility class I and II (MHCI and MHCII) molecules, improving their function as antigen presenting cells [114,115,116].
In vivo, lung secreted cytokines and chemokines also promote systemic awareness to the virus infection. Type I IFNs can signal to developing leukocytes and memory T cells in primary and secondary lymphoid organs such as the bone marrow and spleen to acquire an anti-viral state and enhance their function [117,118]. Such an anti-viral state is thought to functionally improve cells of the immune system before they infiltrate the lungs. Type III IFNs are also induced after respiratory virus infection and likely limit virus spread in epithelial cells [119]. Therefore, type III IFN might be induced at the end the of the stealth phase complementing the function of type I IFN. The speed at which this process occurs is controlled by the ability of the virus to suppress inflammation. This observation points out that immune modulation by the pathogen not only targets local lung immunity but also the external intervention of pre-programmed leukocytes with advantageous antiviral machinery.
Finally, the multifaceted inflammatory response can also affect non-hematopoietic cells such as uninfected epithelial cells, protecting them from infection and allowing a more vigorous response upon stimulation.

7. Viral Antagonism Delays the Initiation of Adaptive Immune Response

In close contact to the epithelial border is a tight network of lung DCs [120] that sense viruses and migrate along a CCR7-mediated chemokine gradient [121] to the lung draining mediastinal lymph nodes (MLNs). In the MLNs, the DCs trigger the proliferation and differentiation of virus-specific T cells [96,122,123,124]. Activated virus-specific effector T cells will eventually circulate back to the bloodstream and are then recruited to the respiratory tract to terminate the infection and clear the virus [125,126].
Studies tracking DC migration from the lung to the MLNs during influenza infection using fluorescent reagents that induce unspecific inflammation have shown that DCs migrate from the lung to the MLNs rapidly [127,128,129]. It is likely that the viral antagonist is unable to inhibit the inflammation triggered by these inflammation inducing fluorescent reagents. However, when no inflammatory agent is present in the tracking reagent, the kinetics of DC migration from the lung to the MLNs during influenza virus infection is quite slow and correlates with the termination of the “stealth phase”. DC migration begins around two days after infection when small numbers of DCs carrying viral antigens are first seen in the MLNs and reach a plateau around 3–4 days after infection [96,122,124,130]. Therefore, inhibiting inflammation for two days not only affects innate immunity but also delays the initiation of adaptive immunity.

8. Conclusions

The incubation period is a helpful definition that describes the time between virus infection and the onset of symptoms. Based on new findings, we propose a model that describes a mechanism of the delayed symptoms (innate immune response) that is likely common to almost all known respiratory virus infections (Figure 2). The delayed rise of the innate immune response to a respiratory virus is explained by the suppression of immunity by the viral antagonist in vivo. The “stealth phase” is terminated by an initiating event or breakthrough that triggers type I IFN and other cytokines that serve to stimulate cells before they are infected. Type I IFN primed cells are protected from viral antagonism allowing the innate immune response to proceed. Much work must still be done to determine the factors, the sequence of events, and cell types that are relevant to accomplish the end of the incubation period.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Karla Tapia for assistance with graphic design and to Sharon Czelusniak for reading the manuscript. This work was supported by NIH/NIAID grants AI041111 and AI082970 to T.M.M. and grants A1083481 and A1083284 to C.B.L.

References and Notes

  1. Lessler, J.; Reich, N.G.; Brookmeyer, R.; Perl, T.M.; Nelson, K.E.; Cummings, D.A. Incubation periods of acute respiratory viral infections: A systematic review. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2009, 9, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Monto, A.S.; Gravenstein, S.; Elliott, M.; Colopy, M.; Schweinle, J. Clinical signs and symptoms predicting influenza infection. Arch. Intern. Med. 2000, 160, 3243–3247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Couch, R.B. Medical Microbiology, 4th ed.; University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston: Galveston, Texas, TX, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hayden, F.G.; Fritz, R.; Lobo, M.C.; Alvord, W.; Strober, W.; Straus, S.E. Local and systemic cytokine responses during experimental human influenza A virus infection. Relation to symptom formation and host defense. J. Clin. Invest. 1998, 101, 643–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Noah, T.L.; Henderson, F.W.; Wortman, I.A.; Devlin, R.B.; Handy, J.; Koren, H.S.; Becker, S. Nasal cytokine production in viral acute upper respiratory infection of childhood. J. Infect. Dis. 1995, 171, 584–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Skoner, D.P.; Gentile, D.A.; Patel, A.; Doyle, W.J. Evidence for cytokine mediation of disease expression in adults experimentally infected with influenza A virus. J. Infect. Dis. 1999, 180, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Eccles, R. Understanding the symptoms of the common cold and influenza. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2005, 5, 718–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Collins, P.L.; Graham, B.S. Viral and host factors in human respiratory syncytial virus pathogenesis. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 2040–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Everard, M.L.; Swarbrick, A.; Wrightham, M.; McIntyre, J.; Dunkley, C.; James, P.D.; Sewell, H.F.; Milner, A.D. Analysis of cells obtained by bronchial lavage of infants with respiratory syncytial virus infection. Arch. Dis. Child. 1994, 71, 428–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Smith, R.S. The cytokine theory of headache. Med. Hypotheses 1992, 39, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gold, R.; Rieckmann, P.; Chang, P.; Abdalla, J. The long-term safety and tolerability of high-dose interferon beta-1a in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: 4-year data from the PRISMS study. Eur. J. Neurol. 2005, 12, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Schaefer, M.; Schmidt, F.; Neumer, R.; Scholler, G.; Schwarz, M. Interferon-alpha, cytokines and possible implications for mood disorders. Bipolar. Disord. 2002, 4 (Suppl. 1), 111–113. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Capuron, L.; Miller, A.H. Cytokines and psychopathology: Lessons from interferon-alpha. Biol. Psychiatry 2004, 56, 819–824. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dinarello, C.A. Biologic basis for interleukin-1 in disease. Blood 1996, 87, 2095–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Netea, M.G.; Kullberg, B.J.; Van der Meer, J.W. Circulating cytokines as mediators of fever. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000, 31 (Suppl. 5), S178–S184. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Leon, L.R. Molecular Biology of Thermoregulation: Invited review: Cytokine regulation of fever: Studies using gene knockout mice. J. Appl. Physiol. 2002, 92, 2648–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Baracos, V.; Rodemann, H.P.; Dinarello, C.A.; Goldberg, A.L. Stimulation of muscle protein degradation and prostaglandin E2 release by leukocytic pyrogen (interleukin-1). A mechanism for the increased degradation of muscle proteins during fever. N. Engl. J. Med. 1983, 308, 553–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Conti, B.; Tabarean, I.; Andrei, C.; Bartfai, T. Cytokines and fever. Front. Biosci. 2004, 9, 1433–1449. [Google Scholar]
  19. Leung, A.K.; Robson, W.L. Sneezing. J. Otolaryngol. 1994, 23, 125–129. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mygind, N.; Secher, C.; Kirkegaard, J. Role of histamine and antihistamines in the nose. Eur. J. Respir. Dis. Suppl. 1983, 128 (Pt. 1), 16–20. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jacoby, D.B. Pathophysiology of airway viral infections. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2004, 17, 333–336. [Google Scholar]
  22. Widdicombe, J.G. Neurophysiology of the cough reflex. Eur. Respir. J. 1995, 8, 1193–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Stockley, R.A.; Bayley, D.; Hill, S.L.; Hill, A.T.; Crooks, S.; Campbell, E.J. Assessment of airway neutrophils by sputum colour: Correlation with airways inflammation. Thorax 2001, 56, 366–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Akerlund, A.; Greiff, L.; Andersson, M.; Bende, M.; Alkner, U.; Persson, C.G. Mucosal exudation of fibrinogen in coronavirus-induced common colds. Acta Otolaryngol. 1993, 113, 642–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Alexopoulou, L.; Holt, A.C.; Medzhitov, R.; Flavell, R.A. Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF-kappaB by Toll-like receptor 3. Nature 2001, 413, 732–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Matsumoto, M.; Funami, K.; Tanabe, M.; Oshiumi, H.; Shingai, M.; Seto, Y.; Yamamoto, A.; Seya, T. Subcellular localization of Toll-like receptor 3 in human dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 3154–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Heil, F.; Hemmi, H.; Hochrein, H.; Ampenberger, F.; Kirschning, C.; Akira, S.; Lipford, G.; Wagner, H.; Bauer, S. Species-specific recognition of single-stranded RNA via toll-like receptor 7 and 8. Science 2004, 303, 1526–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Diebold, S.S.; Kaisho, T.; Hemmi, H.; Akira, S.; Reis e Sousa, C. Innate antiviral responses by means of TLR7-mediated recognition of single-stranded RNA. Science 2004, 303, 1529–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lund, J.; Sato, A.; Akira, S.; Medzhitov, R.; Iwasaki, A. Toll-like receptor 9-mediated recognition of Herpes simplex virus-2 by plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 198, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hemmi, H.; Takeuchi, O.; Kawai, T.; Kaisho, T.; Sato, S.; Sanjo, H.; Matsumoto, M.; Hoshino, K.; Wagner, H.; Takeda, K.; Akira, S. A Toll-like receptor recognizes bacterial DNA. Nature 2000, 408, 740–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Murawski, M.R.; Bowen, G.N.; Cerny, A.M.; Anderson, L.J.; Haynes, L.M.; Tripp, R.A.; Kurt-Jones, E.A.; Finberg, R.W. Respiratory syncytial virus activates innate immunity through toll-like receptor 2. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 1492–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tulic, M.K.; Hurrelbrink, R.J.; Prele, C.M.; Laing, I.A.; Upham, J.W.; Le Souef, P.; Sly, P.D.; Holt, P.G. TLR4 polymorphisms mediate impaired responses to respiratory syncytial virus and lipopolysaccharide. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bieback, K.; Lien, E.; Klagge, I.M.; Avota, E.; Schneider-Schaulies, J.; Duprex, W.P.; Wagner, H.; Kirschning, C.J.; ter Meulen, V.; Schneider-Schaulies, S. Hemagglutinin protein of wild-type measles virus activates toll-like receptor 2 signaling. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 8729–8736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pichlmair, A.; Schulz, O.; Tan, C.P.; Naslund, T.I.; Liljestrom, P.; Weber, F.; Reis e Sousa, C. RIG-I-Mediated antiviral responses to single-stranded RNA bearing 5'-Phosphates. Science 2006, 314, 997–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hornung, V.; Ellegast, J.; Kim, S.; Brzozka, K.; Jung, A.; Kato, H.; Poeck, H.; Akira, S.; Conzelmann, K.K.; Schlee, M.; Endres, S.; Hartmann, G. 5'-Triphosphate RNA is the ligand for RIG-I. Science 2006, 314, 994–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kato, H.; Takeuchi, O.; Sato, S.; Yoneyama, M.; Yamamoto, M.; Matsui, K.; Uematsu, S.; Jung, A.; Kawai, T.; Ishii, K.J.; et al. Differential roles of MDA5 and RIG-I helicases in the recognition of RNA viruses. Nature 2006, 441, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kato, H.; Takeuchi, O.; Mikamo-Satoh, E.; Hirai, R.; Kawai, T.; Matsushita, K.; Hiiragi, A.; Dermody, T.S.; Fujita, T.; Akira, S. Length-dependent recognition of double-stranded ribonucleic acids by retinoic acid-inducible gene-I and melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 205, 1601–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kawai, T.; Takahashi, K.; Sato, S.; Coban, C.; Kumar, H.; Kato, H.; Ishii, K.J.; Takeuchi, O.; Akira, S. IPS-1, an adaptor triggering RIG-I- and Mda5-mediated type I interferon induction. Nat. Immunol. 2005, 6, 981–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Seth, R.B.; Sun, L.; Ea, C.K.; Chen, Z.J. Identification and characterization of MAVS, a mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein that activates NF-kappaB and IRF 3. Cell 2005, 122, 669–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xu, L.G.; Wang, Y.Y.; Han, K.J.; Li, L.Y.; Zhai, Z.; Shu, H.B. VISA is an adapter protein required for virus-triggered IFN-beta signaling. Mol. Cell 2005, 19, 727–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Satoh, T.; Kato, H.; Kumagai, Y.; Yoneyama, M.; Sato, S.; Matsushita, K.; Tsujimura, T.; Fujita, T.; Akira, S.; Takeuchi, O. LGP2 is a positive regulator of RIG-I- and MDA5-mediated antiviral responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107, 1512–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yoneyama, M.; Kikuchi, M.; Matsumoto, K.; Imaizumi, T.; Miyagishi, M.; Taira, K.; Foy, E.; Loo, Y.-M.; Gale, M. Jr; Akira, S.; Yonehara, S.; Kato, A.; Fujita, T. Shared and Unique functions of the DExD/H-Box helicases RIG-I, MDA5, and LGP2 in antiviral innate immunity. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 2851–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Rothenfusser, S.; Goutagny, N.; DiPerna, G.; Gong, M.; Monks, B.G.; Schoenemeyer, A.; Yamamoto, M.; Akira, S.; Fitzgerald, K.A. The RNA helicase Lgp2 inhibits TLR-independent sensing of viral replication by retinoic acid-inducible gene-I. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 5260–5268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kanneganti, T.D.; Body-Malapel, M.; Amer, A.; Park, J.H.; Whitfield, J.; Franchi, L.; Taraporewala, Z.F.; Miller, D.; Patton, J.T.; Inohara, N.; Nunez, G. Critical role for Cryopyrin/Nalp3 in activation of caspase-1 in response to viral infection and double-stranded RNA. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 36560–36568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Poeck, H.; Bscheider, M.; Gross, O.; Finger, K.; Roth, S.; Rebsamen, M.; Hannesschlager, N.; Schlee, M.; Rothenfusser, S.; Barchet, W.; et al. Recognition of RNA virus by RIG-I results in activation of CARD9 and inflammasome signaling for interleukin 1 beta production. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mariathasan, S.; Weiss, D.S.; Newton, K.; McBride, J.; O’Rourke, K.; Roose-Girma, M.; Lee, W.P.; Weinrauch, Y.; Monack, D.M.; Dixit, V.M. Cryopyrin activates the inflammasome in response to toxins and ATP. Nature 2006, 440, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Martinon, F.; Petrilli, V.; Mayor, A.; Tardivel, A.; Tschopp, J. Gout-associated uric acid crystals activate the NALP3 inflammasome. Nature 2006, 440, 237–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Schroder, K.; Tschopp, J. The inflammasomes. Cell 2010, 140, 821–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Allen, I.C.; Scull, M.A.; Moore, C.B.; Holl, E.K.; McElvania-TeKippe, E.; Taxman, D.J.; Guthrie, E.H.; Pickles, R.J.; Ting, J.P. The NLRP3 inflammasome mediates in vivo innate immunity to influenza A virus through recognition of viral RNA. Immunity 2009, 30, 556–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ichinohe, T.; Pang, I.K.; Iwasaki, A. Influenza virus activates inflammasomes via its intracellular M2 ion channel. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 404–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Randall, R.E.; Goodbourn, S. Interferons and viruses: An interplay between induction, signalling, antiviral responses and virus countermeasures. J. Gen. Virol. 2008, 89, 1–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pestka, S.; Krause, C.D.; Walter, M.R. Interferons, interferon-like cytokines, and their receptors. Immunol. Rev. 2004, 202, 8–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Theofilopoulos, A.N.; Baccala, R.; Beutler, B.; Kono, D.H. Type I interferons (alpha/beta) in immunity and autoimmunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2005, 23, 307–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Stark, G.R.; Kerr, I.M.; Williams, B.R.; Silverman, R.H.; Schreiber, R.D. How cells respond to interferons. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1998, 67, 227–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ank, N.; Paludan, S.R. Type III IFNs: New layers of complexity in innate antiviral immunity. Biofactors 2009, 35, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ank, N.; West, H.; Bartholdy, C.; Eriksson, K.; Thomsen, A.R.; Paludan, S.R. Lambda interferon (IFN-lambda), a type III IFN, is induced by viruses and IFNs and displays potent antiviral activity against select virus infections in vivo. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 4501–4509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Sheppard, P.; Kindsvogel, W.; Xu, W.; Henderson, K.; Schlutsmeyer, S.; Whitmore, T.E.; Kuestner, R.; Garrigues, U.; Birks, C.; Roraback, J.; et al. IL-28, IL-29 and their class II cytokine receptor IL-28R. Nat. Immunol. 2003, 4, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kotenko, S.V.; Gallagher, G.; Baurin, V.V.; Lewis-Antes, A.; Shen, M.; Shah, N.K.; Langer, J.A.; Sheikh, F.; Dickensheets, H.; Donnelly, R.P. IFN-lambdas mediate antiviral protection through a distinct class II cytokine receptor complex. Nat. Immunol. 2003, 4, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Uze, G.; Monneron, D. IL-28 and IL-29: Newcomers to the interferon family. Biochimie 2007, 89, 729–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hale, B.G.; Randall, R.E.; Ortin, J.; Jackson, D. The multifunctional NS1 protein of influenza A viruses. J. Gen. Virol. 2008, 89, 2359–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mibayashi, M.; Martinez-Sobrido, L.; Loo, Y.-M.; Cardenas, W.B.; Gale, M. Jr.; Garcia-Sastre, A. Inhibition of Retinoic Acid-Inducible Gene I-Mediated Induction of Beta Interferon by the NS1 Protein of Influenza A Virus. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 514–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Opitz, B.; Rejaibi, A.; Dauber, B.; Eckhard, J.; Vinzing, M.; Schmeck, B.; Hippenstiel, S.; Suttorp, N.; Wolff, T. IFNβ induction by influenza A virus is mediated by RIG-I which is regulated by the viral NS1 protein. Cell. Microbiol. 2007, 9, 930–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Guo, Z.; Chen, L.-m.; Zeng, H.; Gomez, J.A.; Plowden, J.; Fujita, T.; Katz, J.M.; Donis, R.O.; Sambhara, S. NS1 protein of influenza A virus inhibits the function of intracytoplasmic pathogen sensor, RIG-I. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2007, 36, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ludwig, S.; Wang, X.; Ehrhardt, C.; Zheng, H.; Donelan, N.; Planz, O.; Pleschka, S.; Garcia-Sastre, A.; Heins, G.; Wolff, T. The influenza A virus NS1 protein inhibits activation of Jun N-terminal kinase and AP-1 transcription factors. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 11166–11171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Talon, J.; Horvath, C.M.; Polley, R.; Basler, C.F.; Muster, T.; Palese, P.; Garcia-Sastre, A. Activation of interferon regulatory factor 3 is inhibited by the influenza A virus NS1 protein. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 7989–7996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, X.; Li, M.; Zheng, H.; Muster, T.; Palese, P.; Beg, A.A.; Garcia-Sastre, A. Influenza A virus NS1 protein prevents activation of NF-kappa B and induction of Alpha/Beta interferon. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 11566–11573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lu, Y.; Wambach, M.; Katze, M.G.; Krug, R.M. Binding of the influenza virus NS1 protein to double-stranded RNA inhibits the activation of the protein kinase that phosphorylates the elF-2 translation initiation factor. Virology 1995, 214, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Talon, J.; Horvath, C.M.; Polley, R.; Basler, C.F.; Muster, T.; Palese, P.; Garcia-Sastre, A. Activation of interferon regulatory factor 3 is inhibited by the influenza A virus NS1 protein. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 7989–7996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Fortes, P.; Beloso, A.; Ortin, J. Influenza virus NS1 protein inhibits pre-mRNA splicing and blocks mRNA nucleocytoplasmic transport. EMBO J. 1994, 13, 704–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chen, Z.; Li, Y.; Krug, R.M. Influenza A virus NS1 protein targets poly(A)-binding protein II of the cellular 3'-end processing machinery. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 2273–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Fontana, J.M.; Bankamp, B.; Rota, P.A. Inhibition of interferon induction and signaling by paramyxoviruses. Immunol. Rev. 2008, 225, 46–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Childs, K.; Stock, N.; Ross, C.; Andrejeva, J.; Hilton, L.; Skinner, M.; Randall, R.; Goodbourn, S. mda-5, but not RIG-I, is a common target for paramyxovirus V proteins. Virology 2007, 359, 190–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Childs, K.S.; Andrejeva, J.; Randall, R.E.; Goodbourn, S. Mechanism of mda-5 Inhibition by Paramyxovirus V Proteins. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 1465–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Parisien, J.P.; Bamming, D.; Komuro, A.; Ramachandran, A.; Rodriguez, J.J.; Barber, G.; Wojahn, R.D.; Horvath, C.M. A shared interface mediates paramyxovirus interference with antiviral RNA helicases MDA5 and LGP2. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 7252–7260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Andrejeva, J.; Childs, K.S.; Young, D.F.; Carlos, T.S.; Stock, N.; Goodbourn, S.; Randall, R.E. The V proteins of paramyxoviruses bind the IFN-inducible RNA helicase, mda-5, and inhibit its activation of the IFN-beta promoter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101, 17264–17269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lu, L.L.; Puri, M.; Horvath, C.M.; Sen, G.C. Select paramyxoviral V proteins inhibit IRF3 activation by acting as alternative substrates for inhibitor of kappaB kinase epsilon (IKKe)/TBK1. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 14269–14276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Spann, K.M.; Tran, K.C.; Collins, P.L. Effects of nonstructural proteins NS1 and NS2 of human respiratory syncytial virus on interferon regulatory factor 3, NF-κB, and proinflammatory cytokines. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 5353–5362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ling, Z.; Tran, K.C.; Teng, M.N. Human respiratory syncytial virus nonstructural protein NS2 antagonizes the activation of beta interferon transcription by interacting with RIG-I. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 3734–3742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Schlender, J.; Hornung, V.; Finke, S.; Gunthner-Biller, M.; Marozin, S.; Brzozka, K.; Moghim, S.; Endres, S.; Hartmann, G.; Conzelmann, K.K. Inhibition of toll-like receptor 7- and 9-mediated alpha/beta interferon production in human plasmacytoid dendritic cells by respiratory syncytial virus and measles virus. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 5507–5515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pfaller, C.K.; Conzelmann, K.-K. Measles virus V protein is a decoy substrate for IκB kinase α and prevents Toll-like receptor 7/9-mediated interferon induction. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 12365–12373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yokota, S.-i.; Okabayashi, T.; Yokosawa, N.; Fujii, N. Measles virus P protein suppresses toll-like receptor signal through up-regulation of ubiquitin-modifying enzyme A20. FASEB J. 2008, 22, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Van Cleve, W.; Amaro-Carambot, E.; Surman, S.R.; Bekisz, J.; Collins, P.L.; Zoon, K.C.; Murphy, B.R.; Skiadopoulos, M.H.; Bartlett, E.J. Attenuating mutations in the P/C gene of human parainfluenza virus type 1 (HPIV1) vaccine candidates abrogate the inhibition of both induction and signaling of type I interferon (IFN) by wild-type HPIV1. Virology 2006, 352, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Bousse, T.; Chambers, R.L.; Scroggs, R.A.; Portner, A.; Takimoto, T. Human parainfluenza virus type 1 but not Sendai virus replicates in human respiratory cells despite IFN treatment. Virus Res. 2006, 121, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Malur, A.G.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Maitra, R.K.; Banerjee, A.K. Inhibition of STAT 1 phosphorylation by human parainfluenza virus type 3 C protein. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 7877–7882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Shaffer, J.A.; Bellini, W.J.; Rota, P.A. The C protein of measles virus inhibits the type I interferon response. Virology 2003, 315, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ramachandran, A.; Parisien, J.-P.; Horvath, C.M. STAT2 is a primary target for measles virus V protein-mediated alpha/beta interferon signaling inhibition. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 8330–8338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Fontana, J.M.; Bankamp, B.; Bellini, W.J.; Rota, P.A. Regulation of interferon signaling by the C and V proteins from attenuated and wild-type strains of measles virus. Virology 2008, 374, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Caignard, G.; Guerbois, M.; Labernardiere, J.L.; Jacob, Y.; Jones, L.M.; Wild, F.; Tangy, F.; Vidalain, P.O. Measles virus V protein blocks Jak1-mediated phosphorylation of STAT1 to escape IFN-alpha/beta signaling. Virology 2007, 368, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Palosaari, H.; Parisien, J.P.; Rodriguez, J.J.; Ulane, C.M.; Horvath, C.M. STAT protein interference and suppression of cytokine signal transduction by measles virus V protein. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 7635–7644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Takeuchi, K.; Kadota, S.I.; Takeda, M.; Miyajima, N.; Nagata, K. Measles virus V protein blocks interferon (IFN)-alpha/beta but not IFN-gamma signaling by inhibiting STAT1 and STAT2 phosphorylation. FEBS Lett. 2003, 545, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ohno, S.; Ono, N.; Takeda, M.; Takeuchi, K.; Yanagi, Y. Dissection of measles virus V protein in relation to its ability to block alpha/beta interferon signal transduction. J. Gen. Virol. 2004, 85, 2991–2999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lo, M.S.; Brazas, R.M.; Holtzman, M.J. Respiratory syncytial virus nonstructural proteins NS1 and NS2 mediate inhibition of Stat2 expression and alpha/beta interferon responsiveness. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 9315–9319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Spann, K.M.; Tran, K.C.; Chi, B.; Rabin, R.L.; Collins, P.L. Suppression of the induction of alpha, beta, and lambda interferons by the NS1 and NS2 proteins of human respiratory syncytial virus in human epithelial cells and macrophages [corrected]. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 4363–4369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Elliott, J.; Lynch, O.T.; Suessmuth, Y.; Qian, P.; Boyd, C.R.; Burrows, J.F.; Buick, R.; Stevenson, N.J.; Touzelet, O.; Gadina, M.; Power, U.F.; Johnston, J.A. Respiratory syncytial virus NS1 protein degrades STAT2 by using the Elongin-Cullin E3 ligase. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 3428–3436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Hale, B.G.; Albrecht, R.A.; Garcia-Sastre, A. Innate immune evasion strategies of influenza viruses. Future Microbiol. 2010, 5, 23–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Moltedo, B.; Lopez, C.B.; Pazos, M.; Becker, M.I.; Hermesh, T.; Moran, T.M. Cutting edge: Stealth influenza virus replication precedes the initiation of adaptive immunity. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 3569–3573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Matzinger, P. Tolerance, danger, and the extended family. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1994, 12, 991–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Chen, C.J.; Kono, H.; Golenbock, D.; Reed, G.; Akira, S.; Rock, K.L. Identification of a key pathway required for the sterile inflammatory response triggered by dying cells. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 851–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ichinohe, T.; Lee, H.K.; Ogura, Y.; Flavell, R.; Iwasaki, A. Inflammasome recognition of influenza virus is essential for adaptive immune responses. J. Exp. Med. 2009, 206, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kumagai, Y.; Takeuchi, O.; Kato, H.; Kumar, H.; Matsui, K.; Morii, E.; Aozasa, K.; Kawai, T.; Akira, S. Alveolar macrophages are the primary interferon-alpha producer in pulmonary infection with RNA viruses. Immunity 2007, 27, 240–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Diebold, S.S.; Kaisho, T.; Hemmi, H.; Akira, S.; Reis e Sousa, C. Innate antiviral responses by means of TLR7-mediated recognition of single-stranded RNA. Science 2004, 303, 1529–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Lee, H.K.; Lund, J.M.; Ramanathan, B.; Mizushima, N.; Iwasaki, A. Autophagy-dependent viral recognition by plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Science 2007, 315, 1398–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Tschopp, J.; Schroder, K. NLRP3 inflammasome activation: The convergence of multiple signalling pathways on ROS production? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 10, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Schroder, K.; Zhou, R.; Tschopp, J. The NLRP3 inflammasome: A sensor for metabolic danger? Science 2010, 327, 296–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Gasse, P.; Riteau, N.; Charron, S.; Girre, S.; Fick, L.; Petrilli, V.; Tschopp, J.; Lagente, V.; Quesniaux, V.F.; Ryffel, B.; Couillin, I. Uric acid is a danger signal activating NALP3 inflammasome in lung injury inflammation and fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2009, 179, 903–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Kool, M.; Petrilli, V.; De Smedt, T.; Rolaz, A.; Hammad, H.; van Nimwegen, M.; Bergen, I.M.; Castillo, R.; Lambrecht, B.N.; Tschopp, J. Cutting edge: Alum adjuvant stimulates inflammatory dendritic cells through activation of the NALP3 inflammasome. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 3755–3759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Petrilli, V.; Dostert, C.; Muruve, D.A.; Tschopp, J. The inflammasome: A danger sensing complex triggering innate immunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2007, 19, 615–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Agostini, L.; Martinon, F.; Burns, K.; McDermott, M.F.; Hawkins, P.N.; Tschopp, J. NALP3 forms an IL-1beta-processing inflammasome with increased activity in Muckle-Wells autoinflammatory disorder. Immunity 2004, 20, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Thomas, P.G.; Dash, P.; Aldridge, J.R. Jr.; Ellebedy, A.H.; Reynolds, C.; Funk, A.J.; Martin, W.J.; Lamkanfi, M.; Webby, R.J.; Boyd, K.L.; Doherty, P.C.; Kanneganti, T.D. The intracellular sensor NLRP3 mediates key innate and healing responses to influenza A virus via the regulation of caspase-1. Immunity 2009, 30, 566–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Fernandes-Alnemri, T.; Yu, J.W.; Datta, P.; Wu, J.; Alnemri, E.S. AIM2 activates the inflammasome and cell death in response to cytoplasmic DNA. Nature 2009, 458, 509–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kuenzel, S.; Till, A.; Winkler, M.; Hasler, R.; Lipinski, S.; Jung, S.; Grotzinger, J.; Fickenscher, H.; Schreiber, S.; Rosenstiel, P. The nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor NLRC5 is involved in IFN-dependent antiviral immune responses. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 1990–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Yount, J.S.; Kraus, T.A.; Horvath, C.M.; Moran, T.M.; Lopez, C.B. A novel role for viral-defective interfering particles in enhancing dendritic cell maturation. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 4503–4513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Shingai, M.; Ebihara, T.; Begum, N.A.; Kato, A.; Honma, T.; Matsumoto, K.; Saito, H.; Ogura, H.; Matsumoto, M.; Seya, T. Differential type I IFN-inducing abilities of wild-type versus vaccine strains of measles virus. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 6123–6133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Osterlund, P.; Veckman, V.; Siren, J.; Klucher, K.M.; Hiscott, J.; Matikainen, S.; Julkunen, I. Gene expression and antiviral activity of alpha/beta interferons and interleukin-29 in virus-infected human myeloid dendritic cells. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 9608–9617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Phipps-Yonas, H.; Seto, J.; Sealfon, S.C.; Moran, T.M.; Fernandez-Sesma, A. Interferon-beta pretreatment of conventional and plasmacytoid human dendritic cells enhances their activation by influenza virus. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Gallucci, S.; Lolkema, M.; Matzinger, P. Natural adjuvants: Endogenous activators of dendritic cells. Nat. Med. 1999, 5, 1249–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Kohlmeier, J.E.; Cookenham, T.; Roberts, A.D.; Miller, S.C.; Woodland, D.L. Type I Interferons Regulate Cytolytic Activity of Memory CD8+ T Cells in the Lung Airways during Respiratory Virus Challenge. Immunity 2010, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Hermesh, T.; Moltedo, B.; Moran, T.M.; Lopez, C.B. Antiviral Instruction of Bone Marrow Leukocytes during Respiratory Viral Infections. Cell Host Microbe 2010, 7, 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Mordstein, M.; Kochs, G.; Dumoutier, L.; Renauld, J.C.; Paludan, S.R.; Klucher, K.; Staeheli, P. Interferon-lambda contributes to innate immunity of mice against influenza A virus but not against hepatotropic viruses. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Banchereau, J.; Steinman, R.M. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 1998, 392, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Randolph, G.J.; Ochando, J.; Partida-Sanchez, S. Migration of dendritic cell subsets and their precursors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 26, 293–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Brimnes, M.K.; Bonifaz, L.; Steinman, R.M.; Moran, T.M. Influenza virus-induced dendritic cell maturation is associated with the induction of strong T cell immunity to a coadministered, normally nonimmunogenic protein. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 198, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Kim, T.S.; Braciale, T.J. Respiratory dendritic cell subsets differ in their capacity to support the induction of virus-specific cytotoxic CD8+ T cell responses. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e4204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. GeurtsvanKessel, C.H.; Willart, M.A.; van Rijt, L.S.; Muskens, F.; Kool, M.; Baas, C.; Thielemans, K.; Bennett, C.; Clausen, B.E.; Hoogsteden, H.C.; Osterhaus, A.D.; Rimmelzwaan, G.F.; Lambrecht, B.N. Clearance of influenza virus from the lung depends on migratory langerin+CD11b- but not plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 205, 1621–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Lawrence, C.W.; Ream, R.M.; Braciale, T.J. Frequency, specificity, and sites of expansion of CD8+ T cells during primary pulmonary influenza virus infection. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 5332–5340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Thomas, P.G.; Keating, R.; Hulse-Post, D.J.; Doherty, P.C. Cell-mediated protection in influenza infection. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Legge, K.L.; Braciale, T.J. Accelerated migration of respiratory dendritic cells to the regional lymph nodes is limited to the early phase of pulmonary infection. Immunity 2003, 18, 265–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Belz, G.T.; Smith, C.M.; Kleinert, L.; Reading, P.; Brooks, A.; Shortman, K.; Carbone, F.R.; Heath, W.R. Distinct migrating and nonmigrating dendritic cell populations are involved in MHC class I-restricted antigen presentation after lung infection with virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004, 101, 8670–8675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Jakubzick, C.; Helft, J.; Kaplan, T.J.; Randolph, G.J. Optimization of methods to study pulmonary dendritic cell migration reveals distinct capacities of DC subsets to acquire soluble versus particulate antigen. J. Immunol. Method. 2008, 337, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ballesteros-Tato, A.; Leon, B.; Lund, F.E.; Randall, T.D. Temporal changes in dendritic cell subsets, cross-priming and costimulation via CD70 control CD8(+) T cell responses to influenza. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 216–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Viruses 02 02541 g001
Figure 1. Viral antagonism to type I IFN induction and signaling. Many pathogenic viruses are able to inhibit the host cell ability to detect infection through the TLR and RLR pathways, thereby inhibiting the production of type I IFNs and other cytokines. Some viruses are also able to inhibit type I IFNs signaling.
Figure 1. Viral antagonism to type I IFN induction and signaling. Many pathogenic viruses are able to inhibit the host cell ability to detect infection through the TLR and RLR pathways, thereby inhibiting the production of type I IFNs and other cytokines. Some viruses are also able to inhibit type I IFNs signaling.
Viruses 02 02541 g001
Viruses 02 02541 g002
Figure 2. Relationship between the incubation period of influenza virus and the immune response. For the first two days after influenza virus infection, the immune response is inactive (“stealth phase”) due to viral antagonism and no symptoms are observed. The incubation period ends as symptoms abruptly appear about two days after infection when the innate immune response becomes active. The secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines is followed by a robust infiltration of leukocytes to the site of infection and DCs migration from the respiratory tract to the lung draining lymph nodes. The migrating DCs then present viral antigens and activate influenza specific T cells. About six days after infection, virus specific effector T cells infiltrate the lung to resolve the infection.
Figure 2. Relationship between the incubation period of influenza virus and the immune response. For the first two days after influenza virus infection, the immune response is inactive (“stealth phase”) due to viral antagonism and no symptoms are observed. The incubation period ends as symptoms abruptly appear about two days after infection when the innate immune response becomes active. The secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines is followed by a robust infiltration of leukocytes to the site of infection and DCs migration from the respiratory tract to the lung draining lymph nodes. The migrating DCs then present viral antigens and activate influenza specific T cells. About six days after infection, virus specific effector T cells infiltrate the lung to resolve the infection.
Viruses 02 02541 g002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hermesh, T.; Moltedo, B.; López, C.B.; Moran, T.M. Buying Time—The Immune System Determinants of the Incubation Period to Respiratory Viruses. Viruses 2010, 2, 2541-2558. https://doi.org/10.3390/v2112541

AMA Style

Hermesh T, Moltedo B, López CB, Moran TM. Buying Time—The Immune System Determinants of the Incubation Period to Respiratory Viruses. Viruses. 2010; 2(11):2541-2558. https://doi.org/10.3390/v2112541

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hermesh, Tamar, Bruno Moltedo, Carolina B. López, and Thomas M. Moran. 2010. "Buying Time—The Immune System Determinants of the Incubation Period to Respiratory Viruses" Viruses 2, no. 11: 2541-2558. https://doi.org/10.3390/v2112541

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop