Next Article in Journal
Assessment of the Coordination Ability of Sustainable Social-Ecological Systems Development Based on a Set Pair Analysis: A Case Study in Yanchi County, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Stormwater Management: Examining the Role of Local Planning Capacity in Mitigating Peak Surface Runoff
Previous Article in Journal
Forested Land Use Efficiency in China: Spatiotemporal Patterns and Influencing Factors from 1999 to 2010
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Examining the Association between Physical Characteristics of Green Space and Land Surface Temperature: A Case Study of Ulsan, Korea

School of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, 50 UNIST-gil, Ulju-gun, Ulsan, 689-798, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2016, 8(8), 777; https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080777
Submission received: 9 May 2016 / Revised: 1 August 2016 / Accepted: 5 August 2016 / Published: 9 August 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nature-Based Solutions for Urban Challenges)

Abstract

:
The rapid increase of impervious surfaces and the dense development that accompanies urban growth has reduced the amount of green space in urban landscapes and increased urban surface temperatures. Accordingly, the greening of urban spaces has been proposed as one approach to mitigating urban heat island (UHI) effects. To find the most practical green space design for reducing land surface temperatures (LSTs), we explored the effects of the physical characteristics of green spaces on cooling intensity and distance. The physical characteristics of green spaces were defined as shape, size, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and the land-use type of their surroundings. LANDSAT 8 images were used to examine 30 green spaces in Ulsan, Korea. The analytical results showed that the cooling effect was mainly observed within 120 m of a green area and that the intensity of the cooling effects did not exceed 3.0 K. A belt-shaped green space had a greater cooling distance compared to a compact green space. We also found that the NDVI and size of a green space had a positive but non-linear association with cooling intensity.

1. Introduction

Rapid urban growth has resulted in an increase in the amount of impervious surfaces in cities, which are associated with changes in the local climate [1,2]. In particular, intense human activity/traffic and tall buildings that obstruct air movement contribute to the urban heat island (UHI) effect [3], and the intensity of the UHI effect is likely to increase in the context of global warming [1,4]. Previous studies have shown that the UHI effect significantly increases cooling energy in the summer [5,6,7], worsens air pollution [8,9,10], raises risks for early mortality [11], and deteriorates the living conditions of urban dwellers [12,13,14]. Accordingly, policy makers have attempted to mitigate the UHI effect with social, spatial, and environmental interventions. As one promising solution, the greening of urban spaces is held to be an effective method for reducing land surface temperatures (LSTs) and the UHI effect [1,15,16,17].
A considerable amount of literature has reported that the LST of parks and green spaces are lower than the LSTs of impervious land cover areas [18]. The range of reduced LST in green spaces is between approximately 1~3 K [18,19], occasionally exceeding 5 K [1]. Research has also found that reduced LSTs in green spaces are influenced by the size of those spaces [20], NDVI [21,22,23,24], wind speed [1], albedo [25], the proportion of available tree-shaded areas [26], configuration of the land cover [27,28], and the vegetation types planted in them [29]. These studies have primarily examined LST variations inside and outside green spaces caused by their physical characteristics or meteorological conditions [29].
Elsewhere in the literature, related studies have examined the spatial extent of Park Cooling Impact (PCI) effects. Conceptually, PCI intensity indicates the difference between the temperatures inside and outside of parks. Previous studies defined PCI intensity either with air [1,3,30] or land surface temperature [18,31]. While PCI depends on the characteristics of a green space, it also varies by distance from the green space to the built environment [31]. Oliveira et al. [1], for example, investigated the PCI effect of green areas on the surrounding air temperature and found that PCI effects were detected up to 260 m away from the center of a green space. Feyisa et al. [31], examining the cooling effects of 21 parks on LSTs in Ethiopia, found a maximum estimated effect distance of 240 m, with this distance varying according to the shape and size of the parks.
This study aims to investigate the cooling effect of green spaces on mitigating the UHI effect and reducing LSTs. Relative to earlier work on cooling effect of green spaces, our study is original in several respects. First, we explored both cooling intensity and distance as these are associated with the physical characteristics of green spaces. Previous literature has partially addressed this question, but few studies have attempted to detect both the intensity and distance of the cooling effect, primarily because of the relatively small sample sizes available [3,18] and the difficulty of controlling physical conditions outside of those green spaces studied. By selecting green spaces within relatively small geographical areas, this study extended the spatial scope of the cooling effect to areas adjacent to green spaces. Unlike previous studies, which aggregated land surface temperatures in a green space, the unit of analysis in this study is the land surface temperature of each grid. The total number of sample grids used in the analysis was 42,574. An increased number of observations in this study improved its analytical reliability. Second, we defined the context of green space based on land-use type and examined the associations between land-use type and the PCI effect. Several studies investigated LSTs on different land-use and land cover types [19,32]. However, to our knowledge, no study has explicitly hypothesized that land-use type surrounding green spaces would affect their cooling effect. This study defined the land-use type surrounding green spaces as one of the physical characteristics of green spaces and examined the variations of PCI according to that feature. Third, from a methodological standpoint, this study suggests a new approach to estimating the cooling effects of green spaces. The details of this approach are described in Section 2.4.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Selected Green Spaces

With an area of 1060.19 km2 and a population of 1.17 million, the study area, Ulsan, is the seventh largest metropolitan area in Korea and the largest industrial city in Korea. Ulsan is surrounded by mountains, and the Taehwa River runs through the city eastward into the sea. The climate in Ulsan is warm with marked seasonal changes. The annual average precipitation is 1277 mm and the annual average temperature is 14.1   ° C , with August averaging 25.9   ° C and January 2.0   ° C . On 8 August 2013, a temperature of 38.8   ° C was recorded, which is the highest recorded temperature in Ulsan. Land use is heterogeneous, with mixed residential-commercial-industrial areas.
To examine the cooling effects of green spaces on LSTs, green spaces in Ulsan were chosen by applying three criteria: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), location, and size. The NDVI is a simple graphical indicator that assesses the greenness of a target area in remote sensing data. The NDVI was calculated using the corrected reflectance of LANDSAT bands 3 and 4.
N D V I = ρ N I R ( B a n d 4 ) ρ R ( B a n d 3 ) ρ N I R ( B a n d 4 ) + ρ R ( B a n d 3 )
First, to address meteorological and seasonal variations of greenness in the remote sensing data, we tested the appropriate NDVI cut-off points for defining a green space, including 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, and 0.40. After crosschecking the vegetated ground surface data from Google Earth, we choose 0.25 as the most reliable value for defining an urban green space. At 0.20 NDVI, we could not distinguish the green roofs of buildings from green surfaces. If the lower cut-off value is higher than an NDVI of 0.25, the grids located at the boundaries of a green surface tend to be excluded. We then selected the green spaces located within urbanized areas as the main subject of our study. Finally, we excluded small sized areas for two reasons: first, the boundaries of small sized (less than 100 m × 100 m) green spaces were not well detected from the satellite images; second, we assumed that the cooling effect of spaces of that size on adjacent lands would be very limited. Cao et al. [18] showed that parks greater than 20,000 m2 had PCI larger than 1.5 K in all seasons. Thirty green spaces were selected, and their locations are shown in Figure 1. The median size of the selected green spaces was 1.12 km2.
The dominant vegetation types of the sampled green spaces were a mix of coniferous and broad-leaved trees, shrubs, and brush. Fifteen of the green spaces were parks that included various types of vegetation, such as grassland, trees, and shrubs. Two of the selected green spaces were farmlands with grassland and shrubs and three were “buffer” spaces with trees separating industrial and residential areas. At least one of the selected green spaces was identified as a roadside tree area. No bodies of water of substantial size were found within the selected green spaces, although ten of the spaces were located near bodies of water. Four of them have a belt-shape and run along streamlines and six have irregular or compact shapes.

2.2. Land Surface Temperature (LST)

LST was retrieved from Landsat 8 data acquired on 17 August 2013. The retrieved Landsat data was taken at 11 a.m. The cloud cover over the city was 2%. Every 16 days, Landsat 8 collects near-infrared, short wave infrared, and thermal infrared data. The resulting products consist of quantized and calibrated scaled Digital Numbers (DN) representing multispectral image data acquired by both an Operational Land Imager (OLI) and a Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS). These products deliver data in a 16-bit unsigned integer format. We converted the TIRS band data from spectral radiance to brightness temperature using the thermal constants provided in the metadata file of the results. Further details and the algorithm itself can be found on the U.S. Geological Survey website [33].
Figure 2 shows the LST of the study area and the locations of nine Automatic Weather Systems (AWSs). These are part of the meteorological observational network in the Korea Meteorological Administration. The design and operation of AWSs conform to the standards of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). These AWSs are located in diverse geographical locations. Two AWSs are located in each of the following area types: urban area (stations 1, 2), industrial area (stations 3, 6), and mountain area (stations 8, 9). Three AWSs are located at the seaside (stations 4, 5, 7). At 11 a.m. on the study date, the air temperature ranged from 24.7   ° C to 34.4   ° C . The highest air temperature was found at the urban area, and the AWSs at the seaside showed the lowest air temperature. The prevailing wind direction on the study date ranged from 191 ° to 253 ° . The average wind speed at seaside (5.7 m/s) was higher than the speed at urban area (3.8 m/s). The highest wind speed was recorded at the station 6 (7.8 m/s). The selected 30 green spaces were all located in either urban or industrial areas. On average, the level of humidity on the study date was 57.4% and the air speed was 4.5 m/s.

2.3. Physical Characteristics of Green Spaces

To examine variations in the cooling effects of green spaces, we defined four types of physical characteristics: NDVI, Land Shape Intensity (LSI), land-use type, and size. Since we were specifically interested in exploring associations between the physical characteristics of green spaces and cooling effects, we tried to remove other possible causes of the cooling effects in the sample selection phase. In measuring the cooling effect of green spaces, we excluded blue spaces, such as lakes and rivers, adjacent to green spaces since blue spaces may reduce LSTs [34]. The characteristics and context of the selected green spaces are listed in Table 1.

2.3.1. NDVI

We estimated the mean NDVI of the cells within each green space and classified the green spaces into three groups: low NDVI (ranging from 0.25 to 0.30), medium NDVI (ranging from 0.30 to 0.35), and high NDVI (above 0.35). The number of “low” green spaces was seven, “medium” was eight, and “high” was fifteen.

2.3.2. Shape of Green Space

The shape of a green space is one factor influencing its cooling effect [18]. In our study, the shapes of the green spaces were measured using Land Shape Intensity (LSI) [35,36], which is calculated by
L S I = P u 2 π × A
where Pu is the total perimeter around a green space and A is the area of the green space. Intuitively, LSI indicates the relative length of perimeter to area, with a small LSI value representing a concentrated or compact shape (Figure 3). The shapes of our green spaces were classified into three groups: compact (less than 2.0 of LSI), irregular (between 2.0 and 3.5), and belt-shaped (higher than 3.5). The numbers of compact, irregular, and belt-shaped green spaces were 9, 15, and 6, respectively.

2.3.3. Land-Use Type

The Environmental Geographic Information System (EGIS) of Korea classifies the land cover of urbanized areas according to the following six categories: residential, industrial, commercial, cultural, transportation, and public. Since cultural and public land-use usually represents a single parcel or facility, we defined whether our green spaces were located in residential, industrial, or commercial areas. In residential areas, the predominant types of buildings are mixed low and high-rise buildings and low-density retail business areas. Commercial areas are characterized by denser mid- and high-rise building development, while heavy industrial facilities and warehouses are notable types of buildings in industrial areas. We assumed that the density and height of buildings might influence the intensity and distance of green zone cooling effects. Jusuf et al. [19] showed that, during the daytime, industrial areas had a very high LST due to a large open concrete surface and the concrete roofs of buildings. Meanwhile, in commercial areas the shading from the high-rise buildings reduced LSTs. Figure 4 represents typical landscapes of residential, commercial and industrial areas in the study site. The numbers of green spaces located in residential, industrial, and commercial areas were 16, 8, and 6, respectively.

2.3.4. Size

The size of a green space is one of its fundamental physical characteristics. Our green spaces were classified into one of the following three sizes: small (less than 90,000 m2), medium (between 90,000 m2 and 300,000 m2), and large (larger than 300,000 m2). Green spaces smaller than 10,000 m2 were excluded from our analysis because we assumed that the cooling effect of these spaces on the surrounding areas would prove trivial [18]. The numbers of small, medium, and large green spaces we examined were 16, 10, and 4, respectively.

2.4. Definition of Cooling Effect

Cao et al. [18] defined the PCI as the difference between the LST inside a green space and the LST within a 500 m buffer zone outside that green space. This approach, however, presents a couple of methodological problems relevant to exploring the spatial extent of PCI within multiple buffer zones. First, if we define the PCI as the difference between the LST inside a green space and the LST within a specific buffer zone outside that green space, the PCI of a point tends to increase the further that point is located from a green space, which is counter-intuitive. Second, the cooling effect of a green space cannot be defined without prior knowledge of the cooling distance of the green space. Considering these issues, this study suggests a new approach to estimate the cooling effects of green space using the following method:
P C I r = p = 1 n i m P C I i r p n × m
P C I i r p = T max   _ P T i r p
T max   _ p = max ( T 0 p , T 1 p , , T 9 p T 10 p )
  • T 10 p is the mean LST at the 10th ring buffer zone (270–300 m) of p green space
  • T 0 p is the mean LST within green space p
  • T i r p is the LST of point i at rth ring buffer zone of green space p
  • P C I r is the cooling intensity of rth ring buffer zone; m is a number of points located within the rth buffer zone of green space p (in units of   ° C )
  • T max   _ P is a proxy measure representing LST where the cooling effect is absent (in units of   ° C )
  • n is the number of green spaces.
We assumed that the estimated P C I i r p (a thermal contract between T m a x   _ p and T i r p ) would decrease as any grid i was located further from the green space.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

We conducted a two-sample t-test to examine how the spatial extent and intensity of the PCI varied by physical characteristics. Feyisa et al. [31] used multiple linear regression models to examine the associations between cooling distance and the physical characteristics of parks. In contrast, we identified the distance thresholds of cooling effects through an examination of non-linear PCI patterns using a two-sample t-test since an ordinary least squares regression model that relies on the assumption of linearity was not an appropriate statistical method for our study.
To identify the spatial extent of the PCI, we repeatedly tested whether the LST in one buffer zone was significantly lower or higher than the LST in the next buffer zone. We hypothesized that (1) the points within a green space would have a maximum PCI that gradually decreased by distance, and (2) once the PCI exceeded a maximum distance cooling effect, the mean LST in one buffer zone would not be significantly different from the mean LST in the next buffer zone.
To examine variations in PCI, we classified four physical characteristics (NDVI, LSI, land-use, and size) into three groups each. Then we statistically tested whether the LST of one group was significantly different from the LST of the two other groups at each buffer zone.

3. Results

3.1. PCI Effect by Distance from the Green Spaces

The total number of sample grids located within 300 m of the thirty green spaces was 42,574. Figure 5 shows that the grids inside the green spaces had the highest PCI (1.94 K) and that the size of the PCI gradually decreased with distance from the green spaces. PCI at the 150–300 m buffer zones were higher than zero because the value of r in estimating the T m a x   _ p Equation (3) varied with the green spaces.
Table 2 shows that the spatial extent of PCI was limited to within 120 m of the green space. The PCI at the 150 m buffer zone (0.35 K) was not statistically different from that at the 120 m buffer zone (0.32 K). The table indicates that PCI at 270 m are higher than PCI at 240 m, which we supposed was caused by random factors associated with meteorological or physical characteristics other than distance from the green space or the overlapping effect of buffer zones from other green spaces.

3.2. Variations of PCI Effects by Physical Characteristics of Green Spaces

We examined variations of PCI effects by physical characteristics of green spaces up to 300 m from the green space. Because the cooling distance of green spaces did not exceed 180 m from the green spaces, the tables and figures in this section present the results up to 180 m from the green spaces for clarity.
Figure 6 shows that the detected cooling distances were within 120 m of a green space and that the distance was relatively consistent across the three levels of the NDVI groups. Table 3 shows the result of our t-test comparing the PCI of low (reference group), medium, and high NDVI green spaces at each buffer zone. NDVI is an important factor in determining the PCI inside green spaces. Middle and high NDVI areas had 1.42 K and 2.63 K PCI on the ground, and this value was statistically higher than the surface temperature of low NDVI areas (1.08 K). Outside the green spaces, however, we did not find that the medium level NDVI areas had higher PCI than that of the green spaces with low NDVI. Significantly greener spaces with high NDVI had higher PCI than that of low NDVI spaces. This effect was detected within 60 m of the green spaces.
Figure 7 indicates that, on the ground, the shape of a green space was not an important factor in determining PCI, but it might affect cooling distance. The PCI of a belt-shaped green space continuously decreased up to 240 m; however, in the PCI of a compact or irregular shaped green space, the cooling effect distance detected was within 120 m. The main reason for this is the difference in PCI decay over distance. A belt-shaped green space has a lower PCI decay with distance than a compact or irregularly shaped green space. Table 4 also shows that, up to 180 m, a belt-shaped green space has a generally higher PCI than a compact or irregularly shaped one.
Green spaces located in industrial areas had higher PCI than green spaces in residential or commercial areas, while green spaces in commercial land use areas had considerably lower PCI (Table 5). A typical green space located in an industrial, residential, or commercial area had a PCI of 2.41 K, 1.85 K, and 1.07 K on the ground, respectively, and cooling effects were found within 120 m of the green spaces (Figure 8).
It is not surprising that large green spaces have higher PCI than medium or small green spaces (Figure 9). On the ground, the PCI of large, medium, or small green spaces were 2.53 K, 1.49 K, and 1.35 K, respectively. Their PCI gradually decreased by distance. Nevertheless, the size factor itself did not affect cooling distance. Table 6 shows that the PCI of the medium green spaces were a little higher than the PCI of the small green spaces, but the difference was trivial. The PCI of large green spaces, however, were consistently higher than the PCI of the small or medium green spaces, which have effects for up to 120 m from their locations.

4. Discussion

This study classified four physical characteristics of green spaces and examined their PCI and the spatial extent of cooling variations among them.
Consistent with previous findings [3,18,24,31,35], our results showed that higher NDVI and a larger green space were associated with higher PCI. However, our findings also suggested that this association might not follow a linear pattern. Unlike green spaces with high NDVIs (over 0.35) and large sizes (larger than 300,000 m2), those with middle range NDVIs (0.30–0.35) and medium sizes (90,000 m2–300,000 m2) did not have a statistically higher PCI than those with low NDVIs (0.25–0.30) and sizes in the low range (below 90,000 m2). A non-linear relationship between size and PCI has been reported in previous studies [3,18], and our findings showed a non-linear relationship between NDVI and PCI.
With regard to shape (LSI), belt-shaped green areas were shown to have the longest cooling distance. While LSI did not affect the PCI of green spaces on the ground, the PCI of green spaces with a compact shape did decline more sharply over distance than the PCI of a belt-shaped green space. The maximum cooling distance of a belt-shaped green space was detected at over 200 m. Feyisa et al. [31] also found that elongated parks tended to have longer cooling distances and explained that a longer point of contact with the surroundings might maximize the distance over which parks influence the thermal environment. In other words, a belt-shaped green space has a larger cooling distance because, with a given size, the perimeters of those spaces are much longer than those of compact green spaces. Cao et al. [18] and Feyisa et al. [31] reported that a compact shape had a higher PCI, but we did not detect this pattern.
We also found that one notable dissimilarity between the cooling patterns of compact and belt-shape green spaces was the dimension of “cooling direction”. As the cooling distance increases, the cooled down area of belt-shaped green spaces showed one-dimensional growth, while the area of a compact space displayed two-dimensional growth (Figure 10).
The blue-hatched areas represent 50 m of cooling distance from the compact green space (Figure 10a) and the belt-shaped green space (Figure 10b); the sizes of these cooled down areas were identical (10,000 m2). For cooling down three times the amount of land size (30,000 m2), the cooling distance of a belt-shaped green space was identified as 150 m, which is three times the distance of the blue-hatched area, while the distance of a compact space was identified as 133 m. The distinction in cooling distances tended to increase when the size of the green space increased. Thus, given that the size of the cooled down area is the same, the cooling distance of a belt-shaped green space is longer than the cooling distance of a compact green space. This result, however, does not imply that a belt-shaped green space is more effective at cooling down urban land because this result could be interpreted to mean that a compact green space could cool down a larger area when the cooling distance is identical.
Green spaces located in commercial areas had smaller PCI than those located in residential or industrial areas. Two possible explanations can be suggested. First, all other things being equal, the most distinct feature of commercial areas is their high density. In the study area, the mean Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of commercial areas is 187.9% while the mean FAR of residential and industrial areas is 53.7% and 20.5%, respectively. Tall buildings and dense urban environments are causes of UHIs, as their density traps short-wave radiation and obstructs air movement [3]. In other words, the higher density and the larger building sizes in commercial areas may decrease PCI effects by blocking the circulation of cooled air into city blocks. Second, the LST of industrial areas is higher than the LST of residential or commercial areas. By nature, industrial areas are mainly covered by large open concrete surfaces [19] while the high-rise buildings in commercial areas generate shading on the surface. In any case, the density of the built-up environment surrounding a green space affects the size of the PCI of the green space.
Our study has several limitations. First, the resolution of the satellite images we acquired (100 m by 100 m) from Landsat 8 was too low to detect the micro thermal features of green spaces. Alongside these TIRS band data, surface emissivity, atmospheric transmissivity, upwelling radiance, and reflected radiance data might be used to arrive at an even more accurate estimation of LST. Our method for calculating PCI tended to over-estimate PCI by approximately 0.3 K due to variations in LST decay over distance. Second, the surrounding conditions of the selected green spaces were not all the same. Among our six belt-shaped green spaces, four were adjacent to watercourses. Six with irregular or compact shapes were located close to bodies of water, either watercourses or lakes. Two of our irregularly shaped green spaces were adjacent to mountain areas. In measuring cooling effects, we excluded bodies of water or mountain areas from lands adjacent to the green spaces examined. Although there is a possibility that the LST of urban land is affected by uneven characteristics of landscape composition and the configuration of the surrounding areas, we assumed that those features of the surrounding conditions would be a random factor, thus they might not cause systematic bias in estimating PCI. Third, we used Landsat 8 data from only one day in August 2013 because of higher cloud-cover rates on other dates during that summer. It is not uncommon to use one day of data from a typical summer day; Völker et al. [34] showed that, among the 19 studies they reviewed, eight studies used data gathered on a single day. However, analyzing data from multiple dates may improve the reliability of future results. Fourth, LST does not directly indicate the thermal comfort level of humans, although how the thermal sensations of people influence their behavior is important in the context of urban planning [37]. An existing study on remote sensing [38] found that land surface temperature is linearly associated with surface air temperature. Santamouris et al. [39] and Synnefa et al. [40] showed that a decrease in the surface temperature considerably improved thermal comfort. However, it is difficult to accurately quantify the degree of improvement in thermal conditions since the association between land surface temperature and outdoor thermal comfort varies according to meteorological factors as well as physiology [37]. A large number of research projects on outdoor thermal comfort have been conducted in various climates around the world. Most of them investigated the thermal comfort at a relatively limited number of locations in urban context since measurement of outdoor thermal comfort in an urban environment is a complex issue related to various factors. The use of LSTs had the advantage of collecting vast amounts of cell-based surface temperature data at one time. When we consider that the aim of this study is to investigate cooling effects of green spaces with various physical characteristics, the use of LSTs as an indicator for cooling effects seems more reasonable.

5. Conclusions

We hypothesized that different physical characteristics of green spaces might reduce the Land Surface Temperatures (LSTs) of their surroundings and mitigate Urban Heat Islands (UHIs). More specifically, this study aimed to investigate variations of cooling distance and cooling intensity of green spaces associated with their physical characteristics. To define the physical characteristics of urban built environments, we chose four dimensions: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Land Shape Intensity (LSI), size, and land use.
The analytical results showed that the size of the Park Cooling Impact (PCI) varied by physical characteristics. A higher NDVI and a larger green space were positively but non-linearly associated with PCI. The context of the green spaces was also influential in determining PCI. Green spaces located in industrial areas had the highest PCI, and those in commercial districts had the lowest PCI. The study area is the largest industrial city in Korea. Providing more green spaces in concrete covered industrial areas may significantly reduce the LSTs. The maximum size of PCI did not exceed 3 K. While PCI varied by NDVI, size of green space, and land-use type, the cooling distance was mainly found within 120 m of the green spaces. The only feature that might affect the cooling distance was LSI. The PCI of elongated green spaces can reach up to 180 m.
This finding suggests a couple of implications in urban planning. In terms of cooling intensity, construction of urban parks is not always an effective intervention to mitigate UHIs. A green space smaller than 300,000 m2 has a limited cooling intensity while many urban parks do not exceed the recommended size. However, with respect to cooling distance, our finding implies that construction of multiple green spaces in a dispersed pattern may be more effective than construction of a single large green space to reduce LSTs, because the cooling distance is not highly sensitive to the physical characteristics of the green space.
We have focused on a general assessment of the thermal effects that may be useful for urban planners [41]. Our results suggest that there are certain features of green spaces that can be recommended to reduce LSTs and mitigate UHIs in concrete locations. We hope that our findings offer a better understanding of the cooling effects of green spaces and, ultimately, provide practical guidelines for urban planners designing such spaces.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) and funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2015R1D1A1A01058983) and the Technology Advancement Research Program (15CTAP-C078783-02) funded by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of the Korean government.

Author Contributions

Jong-Hwa Park was responsible for data analysis and drafted the manuscript. Gi-Hyoug Cho supervised the overall research and critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript for submission.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
LSTLand Surface Temperature
PCIPark Cooling Impact
LSILand Shape Intensity
UHIUrban Heat Island
NDVINormalized Difference Vegetation Index

References

  1. Oliveira, S.; Andrade, H.; Vaz, T. The cooling effect of green spaces as a contribution to the mitigation of urban heat: A case study in Lisbon. Build. Environ. 2011, 46, 2186–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wong, J.K.W.; Lau, L.S.K. From the ‘urban heat island’ to the ‘green island’? A preliminary investigation into the potential of retrofitting green roofs in Mongkok district of Hong Kong. Habitat Int. 2013, 39, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chang, C.R.; Li, M.H.; Chang, S.D. A preliminary study on the local cool-island intensity of Taipei city parks. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007, 80, 386–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tan, M.; Li, X. Quantifying the effects of settlement size on urban heat islands in fairly uniform geographic areas. Habitat Int. 2015, 49, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Akbari, H.; Pomerantz, M.; Taha, H. Cool surfaces and shade trees to reduce energy use and improve air quality in urban areas. Sol. Energy 2001, 70, 295–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kolokotroni, M.; Zhang, Y.; Watkins, R. The London Heat Island and building cooling design. Sol. Energy 2007, 81, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shen, T.; Chow, D.H.C.; Darkwa, J. Simulating the influence of micro-climatic design on mitigating the Urban Heat Island effect in the Hangzhou Metropolitan Area of China. Int. J. Low Carbon Technol. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stone, B., Jr. Urban heat and air pollution: An emerging role for planners in the climate change debate. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2005, 71, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jacob, D.J.; Winner, D.A. Effect of climate change on air quality. Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Weaver, C.P.; Cooter, E.; Gilliam, R.; Gilliland, A.; Grambsch, A.; Grano, D.; Salathé, E. A preliminary synthesis of modeled climate change impacts on US regional ozone concentrations. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2009, 90, 1843–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Scott, P.A.; Stone, D.A.; Allen, M.R. Human contribution to the European heatwave of 2003. Nature 2004, 432, 610–614. [Google Scholar]
  12. Poumadere, M.; Mays, C.; le Mer, S.; Blong, R. The 2003 heat wave in France: Dangerous climate change here and now. Risk Anal. 2005, 25, 1483–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dallimer, M.; Irvine, K.N.; Skinner, A.M.J.; Davies, Z.G.; Rouquette, J.R.; Maltby, L.L.; Warren, P.H.; Armsworth, P.R.; Gaston, K.J. Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: Understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. Bioscience 2012, 62, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Dallimer, M.; Rouquette, J.R.; Skinner, A.M.J.; Armsworth, P.R.; Maltby, L.M.; Warren, P.H.; Gaston, K.J. Contrasting patterns in species richness of birds, butter-flies and plants along riparian corridors in an urban landscape. Divers. Distrib. 2012, 18, 742–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wong, N.H.; Yu, C. Study of green areas and urban heat island in a tropical city. Habitat Int. 2005, 29, 547–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Georgi, N.J.; Zafiriadis, K. The impact of park trees on microclimate in urban areas. Urban Ecosyst. 2006, 9, 195–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Susca, T.; Gaffin, S.R.; Dell’Osso, G.R. Positive effects of vegetation: Urban heat island and green roofs. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 2119–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Cao, X.; Onishi, A.; Chen, J.; Imura, H. Quantifying the cool island intensity of urban parks using ASTER and IKONOS data. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2010, 96, 224–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jusuf, S.K.; Wong, N.H.; Hagen, E.; Anggoro, R.; Hong, Y. The influence of land use on the urban heat island in Singapore. Habitat Int. 2007, 31, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, X.; Zhong, T.; Feng, X.; Wang, K. Estimation of the relationship between vegetation patches and urban land surface temperature with remote sensing. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2009, 30, 2105–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Weng, Q.; Lu, D.; Schubring, J. Estimation of land surface temperature-vegetation abundance relationship for urban heat island studies. Remote Sens. Environ. 2004, 89, 467–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Weng, Q. Thermal infrared remote sensing for urban climate and environmental studies: Methods, applications, and trends. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2009, 64, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Buyantuyev, A.; Wu, J. Urban heat islands and landscape heterogeneity: Linking spatiotemporal variations in surface temperatures to land-cover and socioeconomic patterns. Landsc. Ecol. 2010, 25, 17–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, C.; Ye, X. Spatial modeling of urban vegetation and land surface temperature: A case study of Beijing. Sustainability 2015, 7, 9478–9504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mackey, C.W.; Lee, X.; Smith, R.B. Remotely sensing the cooling effects of city scale efforts to reduce urban heat island. Build. Environ. 2012, 49, 348–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shashua-Bar, L.; Hoffman, M.E. Vegetation as climatic component in the design of an urban street—An empirical model for predicting the cooling effect of urban green areas with trees. Energy Build. 2000, 31, 221–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhou, W.; Huang, G.; Cadenasso, M.L. Does spatial configuration matter? Understanding the effects of land cover pattern on land surface temperature in urban landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2011, 102, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bowler, D.E.; Buyung-Ali, L.; Knight, T.M.; Pullin, A.S. Urban greening to cool towns and cities: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2010, 97, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Alavipanah, S.; Wegmann, M.; Qureshi, S.; Weng, Q.; Koellner, T. The role of vegetation in mitigating urban land surface temperatures: A case study of Munich, Germany during the warm season. Sustainability 2015, 7, 4689–4706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hamada, S.; Ohta, T. Seasonal variations in the cooling effect of urban green areas on surrounding urban areas. Urban For. Urban Green. 2010, 9, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Feyisa, G.L.; Dons, K.; Meilby, H. Efficiency of parks in mitigating urban heat island effect: An example from Addis Ababa. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 123, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rinner, C.; Hussain, M. Toronto’s urban heat island—Exploring the relationship between land use and surface temperature. Remote Sens. 2011, 3, 1251–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. USGS. Using the USGS Landsat 8 Product. Available online: http://landsat.usgs.gov/Landsat8_Using_Product.php (accessed on 15 April 2016).
  34. Völker, S.; Baumeister, H.; Claßen, T.; Hornberg, C.; Kistemann, T. Evidence for Temperature-Mitigating Capacity of Urban Blue Space: A health geographic perspective. Erdkunde 2013, 67, 355–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, J.; Song, C.; Cao, L.; Zhu, F.; Meng, X.; Wu, J. Impacts of landscape structure on surface urban heat islands: A case study of Shanghai, China. Remote Sens. Environ. 2011, 115, 3249–3263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Patton, D.R. A diversity index for quantifying habitat “edge”. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 1975, 3, 171–173. [Google Scholar]
  37. Chen, L.; Ng, E. Outdoor thermal comfort and outdoor activities: A review of research in the past decade. Cities 2012, 29, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vancutsem, C.; Ceccato, P.; Dinku, T.; Connor, S.J. Evaluation of MODIS land surface temperature data to estimate air temperature in different ecosystems over Africa. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114, 449–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Santamouris, M.; Gaitani, N.; Spanou, A.; Saliari, M.; Giannopoulou, K.; Vasilakopoulou, K.; Kardomateas, T. Using cool paving materials to improve microclimate of urban areas-design realization and results of the flisvos project. Build. Environ. 2012, 53, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Synnefa, A.; Karlessi, T.; Gaitani, N.; Santamouris, M.; Assimakopoulos, D.N.; Papakatsikas, C. Experimental testing of cool colored thin layer asphalt and estimation of its potential to improve the urban microclimate. Build. Environ. 2011, 46, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Echevarría Icaza, L.; van den Dobbelsteen, A.; van der Hoeven, F. Integrating urban heat assessment in urban plans. Sustainability 2016, 8, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Locations of green spaces in Ulsan selected from urbanized areas with green spaces smaller than 100 m by 100 m removed. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) cut-off point was 0.25.
Figure 1. Locations of green spaces in Ulsan selected from urbanized areas with green spaces smaller than 100 m by 100 m removed. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) cut-off point was 0.25.
Sustainability 08 00777 g001
Figure 2. Land surface temperature and the locations of Automatic Weather Systems in the study area.
Figure 2. Land surface temperature and the locations of Automatic Weather Systems in the study area.
Sustainability 08 00777 g002
Figure 3. The Land Shape Intensity (LSI) values of different park shapes (redrawn from Cao et al., 2010). A compact or near-circle shape has a low LSI value (N2) and an elongated or belt-shape has a higher LSI value (N3). The green space number indicates the identification number in Table 1.
Figure 3. The Land Shape Intensity (LSI) values of different park shapes (redrawn from Cao et al., 2010). A compact or near-circle shape has a low LSI value (N2) and an elongated or belt-shape has a higher LSI value (N3). The green space number indicates the identification number in Table 1.
Sustainability 08 00777 g003
Figure 4. Typical landscapes of residential, commercial and industrial areas. The green space number indicates the identification number in Table 1.
Figure 4. Typical landscapes of residential, commercial and industrial areas. The green space number indicates the identification number in Table 1.
Sustainability 08 00777 g004
Figure 5. The mean of PCI. The PCI of green spaces on the ground is approximately 2.0 K, and the cooling distance was identified as 120 m from the green space.
Figure 5. The mean of PCI. The PCI of green spaces on the ground is approximately 2.0 K, and the cooling distance was identified as 120 m from the green space.
Sustainability 08 00777 g005
Figure 6. Associations between cooling distance, PCI, and NDVI. Higher NDVI was associated with higher PCI while the level of NDVI does not affect cooling distance. The cooling distance was approximately 120 m.
Figure 6. Associations between cooling distance, PCI, and NDVI. Higher NDVI was associated with higher PCI while the level of NDVI does not affect cooling distance. The cooling distance was approximately 120 m.
Sustainability 08 00777 g006
Figure 7. Associations between cooling distance, PCI, and LSI. Substantial variations in PCI by the shape of the parks were not found, but the graph represents that a belt shape may have a longer cooling distance.
Figure 7. Associations between cooling distance, PCI, and LSI. Substantial variations in PCI by the shape of the parks were not found, but the graph represents that a belt shape may have a longer cooling distance.
Sustainability 08 00777 g007
Figure 8. Green spaces located in industrial areas had higher PCI (2.41 K) than green spaces in commercial districts (1.07 K). Land-use type may not have been associated with a cooling distance.
Figure 8. Green spaces located in industrial areas had higher PCI (2.41 K) than green spaces in commercial districts (1.07 K). Land-use type may not have been associated with a cooling distance.
Sustainability 08 00777 g008
Figure 9. The PCI of large green spaces (2.53 K) was substantially higher than those of medium or small green spaces. This finding suggests that the size of green spaces and their PCI may have non-linear associations.
Figure 9. The PCI of large green spaces (2.53 K) was substantially higher than those of medium or small green spaces. This finding suggests that the size of green spaces and their PCI may have non-linear associations.
Sustainability 08 00777 g009
Figure 10. Empirically observed dissimilarity of cooling patterns between a compact (a) and a belt-shape green space (b). Given that the size of the cooled down areas were identical (30,000 m2), the cooling distance of the belt-shaped green space was longer than the cooling distance of the compact shape because the size of the cool areas of a compact green space exponentially increases as the cooling distance increases.
Figure 10. Empirically observed dissimilarity of cooling patterns between a compact (a) and a belt-shape green space (b). Given that the size of the cooled down areas were identical (30,000 m2), the cooling distance of the belt-shaped green space was longer than the cooling distance of the compact shape because the size of the cool areas of a compact green space exponentially increases as the cooling distance increases.
Sustainability 08 00777 g010
Table 1. The physical characteristics of the selected green spaces.
Table 1. The physical characteristics of the selected green spaces.
Park IDSizeNDVIAve.LSTLSICharacteristicsPlant TypeLand-Use Type
km2- ° C -
11.296 0.38 30.11 0.70 Historical area Low plant densityResidential
20.049 0.35 31.28 0.49 Neighborhood parkDense treesCommercial
30.073 0.28 32.08 4.64 Waterfront green spaces Low plant densityResidential
40.142 0.29 31.57 8.06 Waterfront green spaces Low plant densityResidential
50.153 0.31 33.35 2.47 Waterfront green spaces with sports facilitiesLow plant densityCommercial
60.095 0.32 31.77 2.25 Hilly terrainDense treesCommercial
70.428 0.35 31.96 3.08 The largest waterfront park in study area Scattered treesResidential
80.046 0.30 33.79 2.92 Green surface near high schoolsScattered treesResidential
90.043 0.29 33.69 3.66 Waterfront green spacesLow plant densityResidential
100.059 0.31 32.13 2.52 Military campScattered treesResidential
110.035 0.29 33.42 2.62 Neighborhood parkScattered treesResidential
120.014 0.29 32.00 1.97 Neighborhood parkScattered treesResidential
130.035 0.29 34.02 3.43 Highway buffer zoneDense treesCommercial
140.027 0.29 34.69 1.96 Fallow landLow plantsResidential
150.092 0.32 33.37 0.70 Historical area Low plant densityResidential
160.050 0.33 28.91 1.96 Hilly terrainDense treesIndustrial
170.127 0.31 31.64 3.18 Buffer zone in industrial areaDense treesIndustrial
180.015 0.32 28.62 1.64 Neighborhood parkScattered treesResidential
190.044 0.32 30.93 2.01 Green area within residential complexScattered treesCommercial
200.039 0.30 31.54 1.89 Buffer zone in industrial areaLow plant densityIndustrial
210.676 0.35 31.45 3.81 Neighborhood parkWater, Dense treesIndustrial
220.041 0.32 34.22 3.91 Waterfront green spaces Low plant densityIndustrial
230.111 0.35 32.24 2.95 Buffer zone in industrial areaLow plant densityIndustrial
240.091 0.31 33.63 4.30 Green land in campusScattered treesResidential
250.056 0.36 30.68 1.29 Hilly terrainDense treesResidential
260.307 0.32 32.25 3.91 Waterfront green spaces Low plant densityResidential
270.064 0.31 29.36 2.48 Neighborhood parkScattered treesResidential
280.110 0.37 26.17 2.71 Hilly terrainDense treesIndustrial
290.105 0.33 33.95 2.15 Fallow landLow plant densityCommercial
300.093 0.33 33.09 2.67 Waterfront green spacesLow plant densityIndustrial
Table 2. Estimated Park Cooling Impact (PCI) at multiple distance intervals.
Table 2. Estimated Park Cooling Impact (PCI) at multiple distance intervals.
DistancenMeanStd. Dev.t95% CI
° C ° C
0 m37231.941.34 [1.90, 1.99]
30 m28771.201.3022.61 ***[1.15, 1.25]
60 m33630.761.2813.33 ***[0.72, 0.81]
90 m29290.481.228.98 ***[0.44, 0.52]
120 m39810.321.195.60 ***[0.28, 0.35]
150 m34430.351.28−1.33[0.31, 0.40]
180 m35990.331.260.76[0.29, 0.37]
210 m49230.291.391.35[0.25, 0.33]
240 m48100.291.480.00[0.25, 0.33]
270 m45310.401.42−3.60 ***[0.36, 0.44]
300 m43950.421.45−0.53[0.37, 0.46]
*** Significant at 1%.
Table 3. Association between PCI and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI).
Table 3. Association between PCI and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI).
DistanceNDVI
Low (0.25 < n ≤ 0.30) (Reference)Medium (0.30 < n < 0.35)High (0.35 ≤ n)
0 m1.08 1.42 ***2.63 ***
30 m0.90 1.00 1.76 ***
60 m0.76 0.64 1.01 ***
90 m0.64 0.39 0.49 **
120 m0.49 0.25 ***0.32 **
150 m0.48 0.32 ***0.30 ***
180 m0.51 0.26 ***0.30 **
*** Significant at 1%; ** significant at 5%.
Table 4. Association between PCI and LSI.
Table 4. Association between PCI and LSI.
DistanceLSI
Compact (Reference)IrregularBelt
0 m2.171.67 ***2.18
30 m1.121.171.28 **
60 m0.640.651.00 ***
90 m0.360.360.74 ***
120 m0.240.240.55 ***
150 m0.300.320.46 **
180 m0.250.330.40 **
*** Significant at 1%; ** significant at 5%.
Table 5. Association between PCI and Land Use.
Table 5. Association between PCI and Land Use.
DistanceLand Use
Commercial (Reference)ResidentialIndustrial
0 m1.071.85 ***2.41 ***
30 m0.641.22 ***1.42 ***
60 m0.420.80 ***0.88 ***
90 m0.150.55 ***0.54 ***
120 m0.070.35 ***0.39 ***
150 m0.300.360.37
180 m0.300.360.30
*** Significant at 1%.
Table 6. Association between PCI and size.
Table 6. Association between PCI and size.
DistanceSize
SmallMediumLarge
0 m1.351.49 **2.53 ***
30 m1.031.051.78 ***
60 m0.690.711.03 ***
90 m0.380.57 ***0.52 ***
120 m0.290.310.42 ***
150 m0.280.45 ***0.35
180 m0.260.41 ***0.35
*** Significant at 1%; ** significant at 5%.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, J.-H.; Cho, G.-H. Examining the Association between Physical Characteristics of Green Space and Land Surface Temperature: A Case Study of Ulsan, Korea. Sustainability 2016, 8, 777. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080777

AMA Style

Park J-H, Cho G-H. Examining the Association between Physical Characteristics of Green Space and Land Surface Temperature: A Case Study of Ulsan, Korea. Sustainability. 2016; 8(8):777. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080777

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Jong-Hwa, and Gi-Hyoug Cho. 2016. "Examining the Association between Physical Characteristics of Green Space and Land Surface Temperature: A Case Study of Ulsan, Korea" Sustainability 8, no. 8: 777. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080777

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop