Next Article in Journal
Triple Recycling Channel Strategies for Remanufacturing of Construction Machinery in a Retailer-Dominated Closed-Loop Supply Chain
Next Article in Special Issue
Transformation Planning of Ecotourism Systems to Invigorate Responsible Tourism
Previous Article in Journal
Delimiting Urban Growth Boundary through Combining Land Suitability Evaluation and Cellular Automata
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Vulnerability of Coastal Tourism Destinations to Climate Change: The Usefulness of Policy Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fostering Nautical Tourism in the Balearic Islands

by
María J. Moreno
1,2 and
F. Javier Otamendi
3,*
1
Escuela Internacional de Doctorado, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid 28933, Spain
2
Escuela Universitaria de Turismo Felipe Moreno, Universitat Illes Baleares, Illes Balears 07122, Spain
3
Economía Aplicada I, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid 28933, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2017, 9(12), 2215; https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122215
Submission received: 30 October 2017 / Revised: 20 November 2017 / Accepted: 27 November 2017 / Published: 30 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tourism Planning and Sustainable Development)

Abstract

:
The aim of this paper is to determine pillars for fostering nautical tourism based on the beliefs and attitudes that professionals in the sector have towards the particularities and difficulties that the market is going through. To achieve these goals, in-depth interviews structured around 37 questions were carried out with agents of associations and nautical firms, public institutions, and the Chamber of Commerce. The qualitative analysis program NVIVO 11 was used to analyze the content of the gathered data. The findings reveal that the main difficulties are related to normative issues and taxation, illegal supply, and a lack of definition of the nautical tourist profile. This absence of definition causes a vagueness when estimating the total number of nautical tourists that visit a destination. Thus, this affects evaluation of the economic, social, and environmental impact of nautical tourism.

1. Introduction

Nautical tourism in the Mediterranean Sea is an attractive means of developing communities at the local, regional and national levels. The Balearic Islands in Spain possess the geographical and climatic conditions and have the natural resources and infrastructure to act as one of the leading destinations in the Mediterranean for nautical tourism, both for navigation and for the practice of water sports [1]. This archipelago has a long and fruitful relationship with nautical tourism [2], which accounts for 1.8% of its GDP [3]. The islands receive massive inflows of European tourists, who are also now even residents, during the spring and summer months, most of whom are potential customers in the nautical sector. In fact, tourism is the most important sector in terms of its contribution to the GDP of the Balearic Islands; it amounted to 45.5% of the €28,461 million in 2016. In addition, in 2016, the Balearic Islands registered the highest year-on-year GDP growth, of 3.8% [4,5].
According to the 2015 annual report of the Spanish Federation of Associations of Touristic Marinas [6], nautical tourism and, above all, the yacht industry and the companies that provide them with services are experiencing tremendous development, that is, an economic dynamization of the local communities that translates into job creation, both direct and indirect [7,8]. Over the years, both public institutions and private companies have relied on this type of tourism as a seasonal factor that will enable them to extend the season and reduce the region’s dependence on the “sun and beach” tourist mono-product.
However, recent competition from other regions in the Mediterranean has threatened the established market. New countries like Montenegro and Croatia are clearly betting on this elite touristic sector and developing policies that could foster sustainable businesses and economies. Nautical tourism has recorded one of the highest development rates in their economies and has shaped the landscape of the Adriatic Sea with the construction of ports [9]. The new scenario has provoked a need for the administration and the government of the different regions to embark upon reformulating their business plan and thinking about determining new policies that could foster nautical tourism and convert it in a strategically sustainable market.
This research focuses, therefore, on setting the strategic lines that would help develop and implement a sustainable plan for nautical tourism in general, and in the Balearic Islands in particular. The specific objective is to discover the main factors that underlie tourism development, in this case, in a mature destination, based on stakeholders’ perceptions and attitudes [10]. Through qualitative interviews with different stakeholders, the views of the administration, port authorities and other actors like the Chamber of Commerce were gathered. Using NVIVO, software that extracts and relates the main word contents of the answers, the main pillars necessary to develop a strategic plan were enumerated based on factors that address the main challenges detected using the interviews’ content analysis.
The remainder of this work is structured as follows. The second section aims at defining nautical tourism and exposing the difficulties inherent in its measurement, as well as addressing the current situation in the sector, including its regulatory and tax framework. The third section details the methodology, which is composed of a structured interview and content analysis of it. In Section 4, the results of the analysis are presented, and finally, in the conclusions, the limitations of the study are examined, and suggestions are made for possible directions for future research.

2. Nautical Tourism

First, it is necessary to clarify what is meant by nautical tourism in general and outline the nautical activities and actors that it comprises. The possibilities of measuring the sector are also addressed. Regulation and taxation as well as the view of the local community are then related to nautical tourism.

2.1. Definitions

There is a lack of a clear definition of nautical tourism and difficulty in measuring it [11]. The fact that there is no internationally adopted definition of nautical tourism results in it being confused with terms such as coastal tourism, maritime tourism or yachting tourism [12].
Whereas some authors consider that the terms nautical tourism and maritime tourism are synonymous and refer to the place where they are practised [13,14], others relate it to performing activities in contact with water by sharing these nautical activities with the enjoyment of nature and the use of tourism services in different regions [15].
To date, there is no official definition of nautical tourism published by the European Union (EU) or the United Nations’ World Tourism Organization (UNWTO). Most of the studies on nautical tourism were conducted in Croatia [16], Greece [17] or Turkey [18], Mediterranean destinations that have opted for nautical tourism as a competitive strategy in coming years. In this regard, we highlight the study conducted by Lukovic [19] and its definition as the most cited in studies conducted by the EU [11,20]. Nautical tourism is “the sum of multifunctional activities and relations caused by the stays of tourist sailors, inside and outside the ports, and by the use of boats and other objects related to nautical recreation, entertainment, sport or other needs.” (This author leaves the term “marine” for the industry and “nautical” for tourism) [19].
There is a debate regarding whether nautical tourism involves navigation in all cases, and in this regard, Lukovic [19] is in favour of considering that the fact that a boat is moored in port implies the use of nautical infrastructure and consequently should be treated as nautical tourism. At the same time, certain authors [20] argue that cruise ships, because of their strategic importance, are not included in nautical tourism and believe that it would be more appropriate to include them in maritime tourism.
Other authors in Spain [21,22,23] agree regarding the definition of the nautical tourist as one who is going to perform nautical activities of a recreational or sporting nature. This definition would include not only the activity of yachting but also those sports activities with or without watercraft (both coastal and inland) and cruise tourism. This conception of nautical tourism coincides with the nautical product that is promoted both nationally and internationally by both the Agency for Tourism of the Balearic Islands (ATB) [24] and by the Palma 365 Foundation (Ajuntament de Palma de Mallorca) [25].
Unlike the previous studies, Garau, in studies conducted in the years 2001 and 2008 [26,27], identifies the nautical tourist and the yachting tourist when considering as nautical tourists only (1) non-residents who travel by boat to the Balearic Islands and reside overnight on their boats; (2) residents sailing outside their home port; and (3) non-residents who have boats to practise nautical activities, even if they do not stay overnight on them. From the above, it is clear that the element that characterizes this type of tourism is the use of a boat not only as a means of transport but rather as the essence of the nautical experience. Likewise, it would not take into consideration nautical activities that are performed without a boat.
In these circumstances, it is necessary to identify what activities would be included in nautical tourism, and for this, we take as a basis the classification made by several authors [8,19,23,24] (Table 1).

2.2. Measurement

The contradictions in the definition of nautical tourist mean that the collected data are incomplete and inconsistent, consequently affecting the creation of policies and laws that drive the sector towards sustainable development and that translate into economic growth, greater employment and protection of the environment.
Although there are numerous studies that measure tourism in general, and governments provide official statistics at the country or regional levels, there are very little data regarding the nautical tourist.
For the Balearic Islands, annual reports (for example [3,28]) are published to provide a measurement of tourism via the movement of tourists, accommodation and other activities of the service sector. Concerning nautical tourism, the nautical product report is prepared by the ATB [24], in which the data are obtained from tourists whose main motivations for their trips were not necessarily nautical. However, 49% out of a total of 367,000 nautical tourists had sailed at some point during their stay.
As an example of the inconsistency of the data, we can compare the previous report with the study performed by Garau [27] regarding nautical tourism in the Balearic Islands. In view of his studies, Garau [26,27] only considers nautical tourists as navigators, resident passers-by or non-residents, and refers to the difficulty of calculating the actual number of nautical tourists and their economic impact. Garau estimates that there were 315,000 nautical tourists (navigators) in 2007, and even indicates that these are conservative estimates and that a correction factor of 20% could be applied when using data provided by the sporting ports of the Balearic Islands and when we find that, especially in summer, many yachts spend the night outside ports.
Other systems to quantify nautical tourism used by researchers have had two main goals: first, to measure demand i.e., the number of recreational boats and number of boat licenses; and second, to estimate supply, i.e., the number of moorings [29].
We must also note that the General Directorate of the Merchant Marine (GDMM) in Spain has a database that includes all vessels registered or flagged in Spain. Each new or imported vessel is registered in the database and is discharged the moment it switches to another flag, sinks or is destroyed. However, there are two factors that affect the reliability of these data. The first is incomplete registration of vessels less than 6 m in length registered before the digitization of the database; if their certificates have not expired, they have not been included in the registry. The second factor is abandoned, sunk or destroyed vessels that have not been discharged from the register. Consequently, this first system of measurement cannot be considered adequate because there are differences between the fleet of census vessels and the real fleet, aggravated by the fact that external demand is not taken into account.
On the other hand, basing the measurements on an analysis of supply could bring us closer to the actual data, even though we encounter difficulty in calculating the percentage of occupation of nautical facilities that actually correspond to nautical tourism. Although it is relatively easy to calculate the occupation of passer-by spaces, it is a common practice in the high season to allow boats in ports to join to each other or to tie at the ends of docks, where there are no marked spaces for mooring. This situation would give us estimates of occupations greater than 100%, overcrowding that is not usually declared or that is camouflaged by the obligation of the ports to shelter vessels that request it in adverse weather conditions. Even so, this system would only be reliable if any boat owner were considered a nautical tourist regardless of whether they were a resident.
In terms of tourists, Frontur surveys [30] try to identify the type of tourist according to the main motivation for their trip, but this measurement is not reliable for two reasons: (1) in response to the question of the motivation for the trip, the majority of the respondents mark the leisure option without specifying whether the main activity is nautical; and (2) the data collection is performed at airports or passenger ports, not in marinas, so it does not take into account tourists who arrive via their own boats.

2.3. Influencing Pillars

2.3.1. Current Status of the Tax and Regulatory Regime Applied to Nautical Tourism

Tax incentives [31] are a factor that has proven successful in developing the tourism market. However, the EU included tourism within its competences only recently and, as a result, there is as yet no common regulatory framework for nautical tourism. In spite of this, work is being performed in the areas of commercial navigation, cruises and the environmental protection of coastal areas.
Concerning Spain, and the Balearic Islands, the acquisition, possession and enjoyment of a recreational craft, in addition to the rental of boats, is taxed at different rates [32,33,34] compared to those in neighboring countries. Spain is one of the European countries with the greatest tax burden on the ownership and use of recreational craft and the most bureaucratic procedures. What follows is a list of taxes that currently hold in Spain:
  • Value added tax (VAT). The purchase of new recreational craft is taxed with a VAT equal to 21% of the purchase price.
  • Special Tax on Certain Means of Transport. This tax is levied upon the first registration of recreational boats or water sports. Spain is the only EU country that applies this state tax, whose collection is the responsibility of the autonomous regions of Spain.
  • Nautical tax T-0 for navigation assistance. This tax affects motorboats of the Spanish flag more than 9 m in length and sailing boats longer than 12 m.
  • Rate for recreational and sports boats T-5. This tax applies to access to and stays within the port area, the mooring post, the use of docks and pontoons and the availability of services. The rate depends on the length of the hull, the width and the number of days. It affects moorings in publicly owned and concession-owned marinas.
  • Tax on capital transfers. The tax applies to the purchase and sale of second-hand vessels when the transferor is a private individual. The tax rate is fixed at 4%, and the taxable amount corresponds to the value declared in the contract for the boat that is transferred.
In addition, the legal submission of the vessels to initial surveys and the issuance of the first certificates by the Maritime Captaincies generate fees to the Ministry of Development that the owners must pay in order to obtain such certificates.
Moreover, the rental of boats is a product emerging as an alternative in navigation and gaining adherents every year. Renting is also taxed at a 21% VAT rate. Compared with neighboring countries, we are at a disadvantage since, in France, a lower VAT of 10% is applied, and in Italy, a VAT of 6.6% is applied to the rental of boats. Although charter companies complain that in some destinations, such as Montenegro, there is a 0% VAT when embarking from the country and tax-free fuel, the activity is supported by tax measures that favor this type of tourism. One of the features most demanded by the sector has been achieved: exemption from the charter registration tax. Above all, this measure benefits large yachts and all the companies that offer them services and maintenance, since they can count on a quota of boats that previously chose other destinations owing to tax problems. The Balearic Islands are the only Spanish region to charter vessels with non-European flags, most of which are large-scale vessels ceded in management to charter companies and with a high expenditure on fuel, moorings, drinks and leisure.
Despite the effort, nautical charter businessmen have denounced the discriminatory treatment of domestic companies by the tax agency. Spanish businessmen encounter restrictions on the use of local ships, while foreign businessmen are allowed to freely operate in Spanish waters. This discrepancy is causing the disembarkation of foreign companies and emigration of Balearic companies, which are beginning to establish headquarters in other Mediterranean countries.
The growing illegal supply from owners who directly rent their boats to tourists, offering them at reduced prices through the Internet, also challenges the sector. The Balearic Register of Landlords, Vessels and Recreational Vessels has been created for the purpose of controlling illegal charters, especially for small boats.

2.3.2. View of Local Community and Practitioners

One last important pillar relates to the view of local community, which is usually classified into supporters, the cautious, and sceptics [35]. The concept of sustainability is based on the premise that the inhabitants of a destination are those that should be involved in the way this destination is being managed and promoted [36]. As with the measurement of nautical tourism, most studies on residents’ attitudes analyze tourism in general and do not focus on specific touristic products [37,38,39].
One major factor affecting the opinion of local community is employment: the more that residents depend on tourism-based jobs, the more positive their attitude [40]. In this regard, even if the nautical sector is growing in the Balearic Islands, most qualified workplaces are occupied by non-residents.
Nautical tourists usually have a positive impact in society since they bring high purchasing power and do not usually generate social or cultural problems with residents. On the other hand, most of the negative impacts are related to the environment. However, a study conducted in the island of Ibiza (Balearic Islands) concluded that the perceived benefits of nautical tourism among residents far outweighed negative impacts [41]. The perception of this high economic status and the propensity to socialization help improve local support, for example in World Heritage Sites [42].
The opinions of the public and practitioners could be incorporated into the strategic plan by means of surveys [43,44]. The practitioners’ view is usually incorporated in order to determine communication strategies [45]. An analysis of the potential demand of nautical tourism and consumer preferences should not be forgotten, nor should the behavior of the tourists [46]. In this regard, there is an extensive review of the literature [47] that explains in detail consumer behavior in tourism. We highlight the possible use of new sources of information like the internet and Google to provide accurate predictions of potential tourists across Europe [48] as well as to measure their satisfaction with a given destination.

3. Methodology

A qualitative investigation has been performed through the use of in-depth structured interviews with representatives of nautical associations of the Balearic Islands, public and private institutions, and the Chamber of Commerce [49], as well as several experts related to the nautical sector from different fields. The qualitative content analysis has been performed using NVIVO (11.0, QSR International Pty Ltd., Doncaster, Victoria, Australia).

3.1. The Structured Interview

Gathering information about strategy and business plans is usually undertaken using interviews or questionnaires [50] to be followed by content analysis (in tourism [51,52]).
The selected data-collection instrument was the structured interviews consisting of a list of open questions, in the same order and with the same words for all subjects interviewed, offering open answers and the possibility of dialogue. With this, we obtained holistic, contextualized and personalized information, offering the interviewer the possibility of clarifying the concepts with the informants.
The interview questions are included in Appendix A, with 37 total questions grouped in seven blocks. The major areas correspond, besides the necessary socio-demographic information, to the major topics that have been addresses in the previous section:
1—
Sociodemographic data.
2—
Terminological definitions: nautical tourism and strategic plan.
3—
Measurement of nautical activity.
4—
Regulation and taxation applicable to the sector.
5—
Considerations about the illegal offer and intrusiveness.
6—
Analysis of behavior and estimation of perceived tourist expenditure.
7—
View of local community about the product.

3.2. The Sample

To select the sample (N = 20), a key informant who had broad knowledge of the whole sector and 19 general informants who had knowledge about different areas that affect the nautical sector were used [53] The sample size is admittedly not large, but the list of informants covers all key experts involved in the development of the sector [54]. It is also similar to sample sizes in regional studies of this sort (for example, 12 and 15 experts in two phases [55], 25 interviewees [36]). The sample was expanded using the “snowball” sampling system. The first interview with the key informant allowed identifying a set of possible general informants with partial views of the phenomenon. For the selection of the group of respondents, we took into account the fundamental variables that distinguish our research object. At the same time, previous research regarding nautical tourism was consulted. All of this allowed us to construct a profile and collect the desired knowledge of each of the participants (see Table 2).
The interview questions were piloted with three informants, who detected several problems, mainly related with returning the questionnaire via mail, since this system did not allow deepening those questions for which the informant did not have a clear opinion or was not very sure of the answer. With such questionnaires, the time invested by the informant was greater when she had to write the answer and think more about what was asked, unlike for spontaneous answers. To avoid this feeling among the informants and to be able to obtain a sufficiently high number of answers, the decision was made to perform face-to-face interviews in each informant’s normal setting in order to facilitate a feeling of comfort.
The interviews were conducted between September 2016 and January 2017, with an approximate duration for each of between 25 min and 45 min, and the data were recorded using a voice recorder.

3.3. Content Analysis

We used NVIVO, a content-analysis software, to code the recorded interviews and analyze their content through word counts and most representative sentences.
The 20 interviews were divided into 491 references or fragments of text that were significantly different to the coder based on the opinions of the interviewees (Table 3). These references, also called meaning units, were then assigned to one of the 8 nodes and their corresponding sub-nodes that had previously been defined by the coder as separate entities of analysis within the software. The 8 nodes corresponded to the main areas and pillars of the interview and included a similar number of total words.
The relative importance of each node (Figure 1) was calculated after dividing the number of references assigned to the node by the total number of references. Measurement is viewed as the key theme of analysis for starting to redirect the nautical sector towards sustainable growth.
Each node (and sub-node) was analyzed by depicting the three words that were most cited within the references that had been assigned to the given node, named as key words. The coding scheme of key words in each node or category serves as a tool to analyse the narratives. As an indicator, the key word depth was calculated after dividing the absolute frequency or word count of the given word by the total number of words in the node. The core sentences of each node are also selected as those that specifically include the key word and are critical for the description of the node and its implications in determining the pillars in order to understand the current situation of nautical tourism.

4. Results

What follows is a detailed analysis of the results obtained, considering the importance given in the interviews to each node or category (Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7, Table 8, Table 9, Table 10 and Table 11).

4.1. Definition and Terminology

There was no consensus definition among all the interviewees regarding the term nautical tourism (Table 4). Most of the interviewees (N = 18) consider resident owners of boats as nautical tourists in all cases, whereas others (N = 2) do not consider them as such in any case. The mention (N = 2) of two new types of nautical tourist is noteworthy: the crews of the yachts that receive maintenance in the shipyards and the crews of regattas. Most do not consider cruises as nautical tourism.

4.2. Strategy

All but two interviewees agree that there is no coordination between public and private agents. The general opinion is that there is excessive competition in the sector and a dispersion of efforts among the various local, regional and national associations and federations.
Although there have been attempts to create a strategic plan (Table 5) and several sectorial meetings have been held, the majority opinion (N = 15) is that they have not achieved positive results for the sector. It has been proposed to create a public–private cluster that will bring together associations, companies, industry, entities and research centres following the model of Barcelona or France and become a consulting body and an engine of initiatives and policies.
Regarding efforts to promote the destination, respondents from private companies (N = 16) consider that only a few initiatives have been performed by the Chamber of Commerce and some private organizations, but nothing comparable to the efforts made by competing domestic destinations (such as Cataluña and Valencia) and international destinations in the Mediterranean (such as France, Italy, Croatia, Greece and Turkey).

4.3. Measurement

The general opinion (Table 6) is that many data are missing when measuring nautical activity and that institutions do not share data about nautical tourists. Although all respondents (N = 20) agree that there are methods for accounting for Spanish vessels in circulation through records of registrations, each yacht club or marina uses its own system to control the rental of moorings and does not share information with other ports or clubs. Regarding vessels abandoned at ports, some interviewees (N = 8) recognize that they are included in the database of registrations, which causes distortion of the data.
Although it is true that the Regulations for the Execution of the Customs Code require the police and Civil Guard to provide data about transiting vessels that request mooring, regardless of whether they fly foreign flags, there is a lack of data to enable more accurate measurement of the number of tourists. As an example, only data about ship owners, not data about crews, are requested (N = 7).
In the case of resident nautical tourists, movements are not counted. A separate question is the situation of boats that are rented under the sharing economy (peer-to-peer, P2P) or foreign flag vessels leased by companies operating from other countries whose users are not considered when counting the number of tourists (N = 6).

4.4. Regulations

Interviewees (Table 7) belonging to charter companies (N = 4) accuse the tax agency of granting privileges to foreign charters by allowing the use of boats ceded in management to the partners of these foreign companies, which is prohibited for Spanish citizens. In contrast, respondents working with large yachts (N = 3) consider this measure to be successful since most of the owners are from outside the EU and have exhibited a growing interest in leasing their yachts in the Balearic Islands.

4.5. Taxation

All participants (Table 8) agree that Spanish regulations and taxation seriously damage the sector compared to other European countries. Specifically, the interviewees cite the 21% VAT for nautical charter, whereas in other countries, companies are exempt or taxed as a tourist product at 10%.
At the same time, Spain is the only European country with a registration fee of 12% for boats. Although the pressure on charter companies has been relaxed slightly since the tax no longer applies to the acquisition of boats, the last attempts to remove it definitively from all the operations of buying and selling have not yielded positive results. Regarding the purchase of large yachts (>24 m), taxing the purchase price at 33% puts the nautical industry at a distinct disadvantage.

4.6. Illegal Supply

There is a consensus regarding the existence of illegal charters (Table 9) by both foreign companies that have their boats moored in marinas and rent their boats via the Internet without any control, and the increasing number of individuals who rent boats through online platforms. In both cases, the users of this type of boat do not appear in the measurements.
The only solution that has been proposed in some cases is inspection, as is performed for illegal tourist houses, and control, through online distribution systems, but some interviewees (N = 3) complain of excessive control of legal companies and “leniency toward pirates”.

4.7. Behaviour of Tourists

There is no general consensus about this aspect, but in some cases (N = 13), it is noted that in recent years, the profile of the tourists who sail on boats (Table 10) consists of persons who have less experience, are less wealthy, and have increasingly high demands for services from the ports and clubs at which they dock compared with previous years. In the case of rentals of boats up to 15 m in length, the typical rental duration has decreased, and the frequency of last-minute reservations has increased.
On the other hand, there has been an increase in rentals of large boats with crews that carry up to 12 passengers by customers with high purchasing power who are concerned about the environment and who spend significant amounts of money at the destination due to the demand for luxury products. Maintenance companies (N = 2) state that “the maintenance of mega-yachts has meant a 121% increase for repair companies between staff and companies in just six years.”

4.8. View of Local Community

All the interviewees except one (N = 19) believe that Balearic society depends upon the nautical sector and is not aware of its strategic importance (Table 11). This alters when it comes to public information that represents the nautical ports and the boats as responsible for the retreat of the Posidonia meadows and the discharge of waste to the sea. Posidonia is an endemic marine plant of the Mediterranean Sea. It is responsible for the water’s transparency and the quality and optimal oxygenation of the marine ecosystem. In recent years, public opinion has linked the Posidonia meadows’ regression to vessel anchors scraping the seabed, but the nautical sector argues that every yacht must have maps and nautical charts indicating the proper areas for anchoring. All the interviewees agree that the pollution is caused mainly by leaks to the sea from exhaust tubes (around which there is no Posidonia) and that sailors are those who least want a dirty sea.
They propose that there should be greater links among marinas, sailing schools and local community in their municipalities. In some cases, the marina is perceived as an elitist facility completely disconnected from the socio-economic reality of the population. There is a lack of nautical culture in Balearic society compared to neighbouring countries, such as France.
To bring the nautical product closer to society, the associations integrated in the ANEN Federation (National Association of Nautical Companies) have launched a campaign with the hashtag #embarcate (in English, “embark in boats”, “navigate, use boats”).

5. Conclusions

Tourism development plans [56] should be based on addressing the local needs of an individual destination within the three aspects of sustainable tourism: economy, society and environment [57]. Sustainable tourism and its underlying development should focus on productivity, so it is sustained over the long term for future generations [58]. In that regard, any form of tourism should be construed as an “adaptive paradigm” [59], or as “adaptive management” of a complex adaptive tourism system (CATS) [60].
The content analysis carried out in this article corroborates the ideas included in the literature about sustainable tourism (for comprehensive reviews [61,62]) and shed new light on how nautical tourism might be fostered in one of the main destinations of the Mediterranean Sea: the Balearic Islands. This region of Spain is a good test-bed to analyse the nautical sector in order to look for pillars that foster a sustainable product and market development.
Table 12 summarizes the qualitative analysis in word counts and depth of the 3 main key words per node. The total depth is calculated as the weighted average of the node depth, using the words as weights. The highlighted key words will be used in the discussion that follows about future strategic plans.
The topics that have been addressed in the interviews with the nautical tourism stakeholders were based on definitions, measurements, taxes and legislation, consumer perceptions and behaviour as well as on environmental issues, The aim was to record and analyse the interviewees’ beliefs about the current situation of the sector.
To foster nautical tourism, it is critical to define and measure all the activities involved in providing a pleasant experience to the tourist. Defining exactly the profile of this type of tourism is necessary to provide accurate data about the number of tourists, boats and ports, and their real economic impact. Therefore, a commitment to monitoring is essential to decide whether one is moving towards sustainable tourism or away from it [63].
Moreover, deficient measurement and insufficient public–private coordination derives from a lack of concern about the growth of nautical tourism and its possible sustainable development [64]. At the same time, there is no control on vessels not docking in nautical ports [65]. This can result in exceeding the carrying capacity and saturation of marine and coastal space, which represents the antithesis of a sustainable form of tourism [14].
In the era of Big Data and the Internet of Things, it should not be too complicated to develop databases that keep track of the boats and their movements in open waters and in-and-out of ports. The control of the fleet follows, allowing for the fight against illegal competition, especially in the charters’ activities. There are only a few references relative to quantifying recreational boating uses and practices [66,67]. Large vessels over 15 m are currently being monitored using the AIS (automatic identification system) (https://www.marinetraffic.com/es/ais/home).
The difficulty of measuring nautical tourists, especially those anchoring outside ports or those from illegal charters, should lead to the necessity of using indirect indicators. These indicators such as consumption of fuel, water or garbage-collection at ports, could be the starting point for estimating the human pressure and measuring the sustainability of nautical tourism [68]. Anyhow, information technologies and Big Data are the tools of the era and should be used for measuring fleets, in this case yachts, in order to provide integrated reporting [69]. In relation to the economic impact, we propose to measure expenditures in nautical activity in the gross domestic product (GDP) via a new Tourism Satellite Account (TSA) [17,70,71] to be included in the National Classification of Economic Activities (Clasificación Nacional de Actividades Económicas—CNAE, in Spain).
With the data available, a more precise strategic plan could be established for this attractive sector, focusing on the different pillars that have been identified. First, and from the demand side, the touristic product has to be attractive and competitive, with the destinations being sold as distinct and unique through dissemination activities as well as by branding the destination [53].
Greater local support from the residents should be strived for, especially addressing environmental issues. On islands, due to the limited space, residents are more aware of overpopulation and environmental deterioration that, in some cases, are associated with tourism. In these cases, they perceive the impact of tourism as the opposite of economic growth [37]. From the supply side, the main actors ask for measures to augment the size of the players through associations. Once again, in our technological and ever-changing society, the call is for mergers to be established since bigger SMEs are more likely to survive in such a competitive world via economies of scale [72,73].
Taxes and legislation must be adapted to provide a less restrictive framework and more homogeneity across the Mediterranean countries and even across Europe. Spanish legislation in that regard does not favour the economic development of the yacht industry and discriminates against Spanish charter companies compared to companies from other countries. The taxation of nautical charter companies places the Balearic Islands in a less competitive position relative to other European destinations, such as France, Greece, Croatia and Montenegro.
In that regard, the new Balearic Ports Law (Law 6/2014, of 18th of July, amending Law 10/2005, of 21st of June, of Balearic Ports. Boletín Oficial de les Illes Balears. 26th of July 2014. N. 101), which represents a consensus among the main associations and nautical entrepreneurs, increased the length of concessions of the ports to 35 years. More importantly, and considering the occupation of the ports, the law has tried to provide a solution to the problems of delinquency and abandoned boats that occupy moorings. Nautical tourism is, therefore, a sector that has been undergoing changes in the last decades in the Mediterranean Sea. Some countries in the Adriatic Sea are starting to see it as an immense opportunity for development [74] whereas others that are more mature, like the Balearic Islands in Spain, are trying to adapt to the new situation and competition in the market. In any country, there is a need to set interdisciplinary strategic lines based on a precise definition and a correct measurement of activities in order to develop and implement a sustainable business plan for nautical tourism. This plan should help the countries raise their GDP and increase the economic benefits within local communities without damaging the environment, that is, it should implement an adaptive tourism system. Including the underlying pillars that have been identified and analysed in this research in such a strategic plan is a challenging task that will surely foster an important sector in the Mediterranean countries.

Author Contributions

M.J. Moreno and F.J. Otamendi conceived the study; M.J. Moreno designed and performed the interviews and coded the data; M.J. Moreno and F.J. Otamendi analyzed the results and wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A. In-Depth Interview Questionnaire

This questionnaire is structured in seven sections. The first section gathers information on the socio-economic profile of the informants. The following sections delve into several lines of study, listed below:
1—
Socio-demographic data
2—
Terminological definitions: nautical tourism and strategic plan
3—
Measurement of nautical activity
4—
Regulation and taxation applicable to the sector
5—
Considerations about the illegal offer and intrusiveness
6—
Analysis of behavior and estimation of perceived tourist expenditure
7—
View of the local community about the product

Appendix A.1. Socio-demographic Data

  • Age
  • Gender
  • Activity:
    • Marina/nautical club/port
    • Charter
    • Association
    • Nautical organisation
    • Manteinance
    • Public institution
    • Others
  • Employment status
  • Years of experience
  • Previous experience

Appendix A.2. Terminological Definitions: Nautical Tourism and Strategic Plan

  • How would you define nautical tourism and what activities would you include in it?
  • When can we consider a tourist as nautical?
  • Related to the previous question, would you consider a resident boat skipper a nautical tourist?
  • If yes, in what circumstances?
  • Do you think that there is currently coordination between different public administrations, associations and private companies?
  • Is there a strategic plan to promote the sector that brings together all the agents involved?
  • In your opinion, are efforts being made to promote the Islands as a nautical tourism destination?

Appendix A.3. Measurement of Nautical Activity

  • Do you know the existence of any method that counts the number of boats in movement in Spain?
  • And a record of registrations and de-registrations?
  • In relation to moorings, what is the system or tool that ports use for their control?
  • Are the moorings occupied by residents’ boats different from those occupied by boats in transit?
  • Continuing with the boats in transit, do you know what data is requested from a passerby who reserves mooring?
  • Is there overbooking in moorings? Is it recorded?
  • Is information shared with other marinas? And with the police or customs?
  • What measures are being taken to address the problem of abandoned vessels at marinas and ports?
  • In your opinion, is the measurement of nautical tourists correct?

Appendix A.4. Regulation and Taxation Applicable to the Sector

  • Are there contradictions between the local, autonomous, state and European regulations affecting the nautical sector?
  • Based on your experience/knowledge, what standards affect the sector to a greater extent?
  • Do you consider that the taxation applicable in Spain favors or undermines the development of the sector? In what sense?
  • Is there inequality at the tax level with other competing destinations? What taxes do the nautical companies declare here that are not being applied in other destinations?
  • What measures could be taken to make the nautical sector more competitive against other countries?

Appendix A.5. Considerations about the Illegal Offer and Intrusiveness

  • In your opinion, is there illegal charter on the islands?
  • If so, what is the reason for this proliferation of illegally operating vessels? Do you have any idea how they operate?
  • How does the intrusiveness of these companies that operate without a home port undermine the industry?
  • What measures are being taken or should be taken to avoid this?
  • Do these users of illegal yacht charter appear in measurements of nautical tourists?

Appendix A.6. Analysis of Behavior and Estimation of Perceived Tourist Expenditure

1. What differences have you noticed between the behavior of a nautical charter tourist and that of one who is traveling with his own boat?
- …
navigation?
- …
anchoring and mooring?
- …
days of stay?
- …
spending on destiny?
- …
services demanded?
- …
satisfaction?

Appendix A.7. View of the Local Community about the Product

  • What is the opinion of society in general about nautical tourism? Is there awareness of the importance to the destination?
  • Does this opinion favor the development of the industry?
  • Is there any plan to bring the nautical product closer to the local community that will improve its perception?
  • According to your opinion, what do residents think of the transformation of the territory by the expansion of marinas and ports and the conversion of small ports into luxury marinas for large yachts?
Finally, is there any comment or suggestion you would like to make about the actions evaluated

References

  1. Garau, J. El Turismo Náutico de Chárter de Recreo en Baleares; Cambra de Comerç, Indústria i Navegació de Mallorca, Eivissa i Formentera: Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alcover, A.; Alemany, M.; Jacob, M.; Payeras, M.; Garcia, A.; Martinez-Ribes, L. The economic impact of yacht charter tourism on the Balearic economy. Tour. Econ. 2011, 17, 625–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Agencia de Turismo de Baleares (ATB). El Turisme a les Illes Balears. Anuari 2016; Govern de les Illes Balears, Conselleria d’Innovació, Recerca I Turisme: Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 2017.
  4. Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). Producto Interior Bruto Regional. Año 2016; Instituto Nacional de Estadística: Madrid, Spain, 2017.
  5. Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). España en Cifras 2017; Instituto Nacional de Estadística: Madrid, Spain, 2017.
  6. Federación Española de Asociaciones de Puertos Deportivos Turísticos (FEAPDT). Informe Anual de los Puertos Deportivos en España 2015; Federación Española de Asociaciones de Puertos Deportivos Turísticos: Barcelona, Spain, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jugovic, A.; Kovacic, M.; Hadzic, A. Sustainable Development Model for Nautical Tourism Ports. Tour. Hosp. Manag. 2011, 17, 175–186. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gómez, E. The management of nautical and recreational installations their relationship with nautical tourism in the Costa Blanca region. Investig. Tur. 2012, 1, 119–131. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kovacic, M.; Favro, S.; Mezak, V. Construction of Nautical Tourism Ports as an Incentive to Local Development. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2016, 15, 395–403. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ali, F.; Hussain, K.; Nair, V.; Nair, P.K. Stakeholders’ perceptions & attitudes towards tourism development in a mature destination. Tourism 2017, 65, 173–186. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ecorys. Study in Support of Policy Measures for Maritime and Coastal Tourism at EU Level; DG Maritime Affairs & Fisheries: Brussels, Belgium, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  12. Marusic, Z.; Ivandic, N.; Horak, S. Nautical Tourism within TSA Framework: Case of Croatia. In Proceedings of the 13th Global Forum on Tourism Statistics, Nara, Japan, 17–18 November 2014. [Google Scholar]
  13. Orams, M. Marine Tourism, Development, Impact and Management; Routledge: London, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lück, M. (Ed.) Nautical Tourism: Concepts and Issues; Cognizant Communication Corp.: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  15. G.M.M. Consultores Turísticos. El Turismo Náutico en España. Proceedings of 7° Symposium Sobre Puertos Deportivos, Gijón, Spain, 1998; Turespaña, Instituto de Turismo de España: Gijón, Spain, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  16. Favro, S.; Grzetic, Z.; Kovacic, M. Towards Sustainable Yachting in Croatian Traditional Island Ports. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2010, 9, 787–794. [Google Scholar]
  17. Diakomihalis, M. Estimation of the economic impacts of yachting in Greece via the tourism satellite account. Tour. Econ. 2008, 14, 871–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sariisik, M.; Turkay, O.; Akova, O. How to manage yacht tourism in Turkey: A swot analysis and related strategies. Procedia Soc. Behv. Sci. 2011, 24, 1014–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Luković, T. Nautical Tourism and Its Function in the Economic Development of Europe. In Visions for Global Tourism Industry—Creating and Sustaining Competitive Strategies; Kasimoglu, M., Ed.; InTech: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  20. European Commission. Assessment of the Impact of Business Development Improvements around Nautical Tourism; Final Report; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  21. Esteban Chapapría, V. El planteamiento de infraestructuras para el turismo náutico. Cuadernos de Turismo 2000, 6, 29–44. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ferradás Carrasco, C. La relevancia del Turismo Náutico en la Oferta Turística. Cuadernos de Turismo 2001, 7, 67–80. [Google Scholar]
  23. Peláez Verdet, A. La Repercusión de la Administración y Gestión de Los Puertos Deportivos en el Desarrollo del Turismo Náutico: Estrategias Para el Caso de la Costa del Sol. Doctor’s Thesis, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  24. Agencia de Turismo de Baleares (ATB). Producto Náutica. Información Básica Sobre el Producto. Datos 2011–2013; Agencia de Turismo de Baleares, Govern de les Illes Balears: Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 2013.
  25. Ajuntament de Palma: Observatorio Turístico de Palma. In Turismo Náutico 2011; Palma de Mallorca 365; Ajuntament de Palma: Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 2012.
  26. Garau, J. El Turismo Náutico como elemento de diversificación turística. Análisis del consumidor e impacto económico: El caso de Baleares. Revista de Investigación y Marketing 2001, 88, 62–74. [Google Scholar]
  27. Garau, J. El turisme nàutic a Balears 2007; Collecció Estudis Turístics No. 9; Govern de les Illes Balears, Conselleria de Turisme: Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 2008.
  28. Agencia de Turismo de Baleares (ATB). El Turisme a les Illes Balears. Anuari 2015; Govern de les Illes Balears, Conselleria d’Innovació, Recerca I Turisme: Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 2016.
  29. Benevolo, C. Problematiche di sostenibilità nell’ambito del turismo nautico in Italia. Impresa Progett.-Electron. J. Manag. 2011, 2, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  30. Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). Estadística de Movimientos Turísticos en Frontera y Encuesta del Gasto Turístico (FRONTUR-EGATUR). Metodología; INE: Madrid, Spain, 2015; pp. 33–38.
  31. Garsous, G.; Corderi, D.; Velasco, M.; Colombo, A. Tax Incentives and Job Creation in the Tourism Sector of Brazil’s SUDENE Area. World Dev. 2017, 96, 87–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cambra de Comerç; Indústria i Navegació de Mallorca; Eivissa i Formentera. Informe Sobre la Fiscalidad del Chárter Náutico; Servicio de Estudios y Publicaciones: Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  33. Payeras, M.; Alcover, A.; Alemany, M.; García, M.A.; Jacob, M.; Martínez, L. Turismo de Chárter Náutico en Baleares; Cambra de Comerç, Indústria i Navegació de Mallorca, Eivissa i Formentera: Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  34. Garau, J. El Turismo de Chárter Náutico. Illes Balears; Cambra de Comerç, Indústria i Navegació de Mallorca, Eivissa i Formentera, Colección debate empresarial: Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gon, M.; Osti, L.; Pechlaner, H. Leisure boat tourism: Residents’ attitudes towards nautical tourism development. Tour. Rev. 2016, 71, 180–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zouganeli, S.; Trihas, N.; Antonaki, M.; Kladou, S. Aspects of sustainability in the destination branding process: A bottom-up approach. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2012, 21, 739–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Díaz, R.; Gutierrez, D.; Garau, J. Actitud del residente en destinos turísticos insulares: Un análisis comparativo. In Proceedings of the XIX Encuentro de Profesores Universitarios de Marketing, ESIC, Vigo, Spain, 19–21 September 2007. [Google Scholar]
  38. Bujosa, A.; Rosselló, J. Attitudes toward tourism and tourism congestion. Région et Développement 2007, 25, 193–207. [Google Scholar]
  39. Gutiérrez, D.; Díaz, R. Las actitudes de los residentes hacia el turismo en un destino Maduro. In Destinos Turísticos Maduros Ante el Cambio. Reflexiones Desde Canarias; Hernández, R., Santana, A., Eds.; Instituto Universitario de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, Universidad de la Laguna: Canary Islands, Spain, 2010; pp. 255–280. ISBN 978-84-614-3386-5. [Google Scholar]
  40. Almeida, F.; Balbuena, A.; Cortés, R. Resident’s attitudes towards the impacts of Tourism. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2015, 13, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cardona, J.R. Tipos de oferta turística y actitudes de los residents: El caso de Ibiza. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo 2014, 8, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chi, C.; Cai, R.; Li, Y. Factors influencing residents’ subjective well-being at World Heritage Sites. Tour. Manag. 2017, 63, 209–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. MacKenzie, C.; Salerno, J.; Hartter, J.; Chapman, C.A.; Reyna, R.; Tumusiime, D.M.; Drake, M. Changing perceptions of protected area benefits and problems around Kibale National Park, Uganda. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 200, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lin, D.; Simmons, D. Structured inter-network collaboration: Public participation in tourism planning in Southern China. Tour. Manag. 2017, 63, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fernandez-Cavia, J.; Marchiori, E.; Haven-Tang, C.; Cantoni, L. Online communication in Spanish destination marketing organizations: The view of practitioners. J. Vacat. Mark. 2017, 23, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cho, W. Analyses of Consumer Preferences and Perceptions Regarding Activation of Yacht Tourism Industry. J. Korean Navig. Port Res. 2012, 36, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cohen, S.; Prayag, G.; Moital, M. Consumer behaviour in tourism: Concepts, influences and opportunities. Curr. Issues Tour. 2014, 17, 872–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Oender, I. Forecasting tourism demand with Google trends: Accuracy comparison of countries versus cities. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2017, 19, 648–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Woodside, A. Case Study Research: Theory, Methods, Practice; Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2010; pp. 263–289. [Google Scholar]
  50. Paletto, A.; Giacovelli, G.; Pastorella, F. Stakeholders’ opinions and expectations for the forest-based sector: A regional case study in Italy. Int. For. Rev. 2017, 19, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Albrecht, J. Challenges in National-level Tourism Strategy Implementation—A Long-term Perspective on the New Zealand Tourism Strategy 2015. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2017, 19, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Penco, L.; Profumo, G.; Scarsi, R. The Quality of Cruise Companies’ Mission Statements: A Content Analysis. Int. J. Transp. Econ. 2017, 44, 295–314. [Google Scholar]
  53. Taylor, S.; Bogdan, R. Introducción a Los Métodos Cualitativos de Investigación; Ediciones Paidós Ibérica: Barcelona, Spain, 1987; pp. 31–131. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kotler, P.; Gertner, D. Country as brand, product, and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective. J. Brand Manag. 2002, 9, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, S.; Lee, M.; Château, P.; Chang, Y. Performance Indicator Framework for Evaluation of Sustainable Tourism in the Taiwan Coastal Zone. Sustainability 2016, 8, 652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sharpley, R. Tourism, Development and the Environment: Beyond Sustainability; Earthscan: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  57. Niedziółka, I. Sustainable Tourism Development. Reg. Form. Dev. Stud. 2012, 8, 157–166. [Google Scholar]
  58. World Commission on Environment and Development. The Brundtland Report; OUP: Oxford, UK, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  59. Hunter, C. Sustainable tourism as an adaptive paradigm. Ann. Tour. Res. 1997, 24, 850–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Farrell, B.; Twining-Ward, L. Reconceptualizing tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 2004, 31, 274–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Butler, R. Sustainable tourism: A state-of-the-art review. Tour. Geogr. 1999, 1, 7–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lu, J.; Nepal, S. Sustainable tourism research: An analysis of papers published in the Journal of Sustainable Tourism. J. Sustain. Tour. 2009, 17, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Countryside Commission. Sustaining Rural Tourism; Countryside Commission (CCP 483): Cheltenham, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  64. Barke, M.; Towner, J. Learning from experience? Progress towards a sustainable future for tourism in the central and eastern Andalusian littoral. In Coastal Mass Tourism: Diversification and Sustainable Development in Southern Europe; Bramwell, B., Ed.; Channel View Publications: Clevedon, UK, 2004; Volume 12, pp. 157–175. ISBN 1-873150-69-5. [Google Scholar]
  65. Kovacic, M.; Gracan, D.; Jugovic, A. The scenario method of nautical tourism development—A case study of Croatia. Sci. J. Marit. Res. 2015, 29, 125–132. [Google Scholar]
  66. Balaguer, P.; Diedrich, A.; Sarda, R.; Fuster, M.; Canellas, B.; Tintore, J. Spatial analysis of recreational boating as a first key step for marine spatial planning in Mallorca (Balearic Islands, Spain). Ocean Coast. Manag. 2011, 54, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Virk, A.; Pikora, T. Developing a tool to measure safe recreational boating practice. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2011, 43, 447–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Vera, F.; Ivars, J. Measuring sustainability in a mass tourism destination: Pressure perceptions and policy responses in Torrevieja, Spain. In Coastal Mass Tourism: Diversification and Sustainable Development in Southern Europe; Bramwell, B., Ed.; Channel View Publications: Clevedon, UK, 2004; Volume 12, pp. 176–199. ISBN 1-873150-69-5. [Google Scholar]
  69. Cucari, N.; Mugova, S. Corporate Sustainability in the Tourism Sector: Is “Integrated Reporting” an Appropriate Strategy? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Management Leadership and Governance, University Witwatersrand, Wits Business School, Johannesburg, South Africa, 16–17 March 2017; Ndaba, Z., Mokoteli, T., Eds.; pp. 85–92. [Google Scholar]
  70. Eurostat. Tourism Satellite Account: Recommended Methodological Framework (2008–2009); European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  71. Eurostat. Tourism Satellite Accounts in Europe, 2016 ed.; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  72. Gocen, S.; Albeni, M.; Yirik, S.; Yildiz, H.; Akdere, M. Competition, market structure and market power within the hotel-supplier sector in Antalya, Turkey: The case for technology integration. Tour. Econ. 2017, 23, 647–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kalnins, A.; Froeb, L.; Tschantz, S. Can mergers increase output? Evidence from the lodging industry. RAND J. Econ. 2017, 48, 178–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kovacic, M.; Grzetic, Z.; Boskovic, D. Nautical tourism in fostering the sustainable development: A case study of Croatia’s coast and island. Tour. Int. Multidiscip. J. Tour. 2011, 6, 221–232. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Relative importance of each node.
Figure 1. Relative importance of each node.
Sustainability 09 02215 g001
Table 1. Activities included in nautical tourism.
Table 1. Activities included in nautical tourism.
Main ActivitiesSecondary ActivitiesAdditional Activities
  • Moorings in nautical tourism ports
  • Fishing
  • Water sports
  • Shipyards
  • Yacht charter
  • Cruises
  • Scuba diving
  • Vessel maintenance
  • Service providers
Table 2. Sociodemographic profile of the informants.
Table 2. Sociodemographic profile of the informants.
Informant CodeActivityEmployment StatusYears of Experience in Nautical SectorAgeGender
IF1CharterBroker>25 56–65F
IF2Chamber of CommerceTechnician5–15 36–45F
IF3CharterManager>25 56–65F
IF4MaintenanceManager15–2556–65M
IF5PortDirector5–1536–45F
IF6Public InstitutionPresident<5 56–65M
IF7Other expertsJournalist5–1536–45M
IF8AssociationPresident5–1546–55M
IF9Service ProviderOwner15–2546–55F
IF10Public InstitutionTechnician5–1536–45M
IF11Public InstitutionManager5–1536–45F
IF12MaintenanceManager5–1546–55M
IF13PortDirector>2556–65M
IF14AssociationGeneral Secretary5–1536–45M
IF15PortDirector5–1546–55F
IF16CharterOperations Manager5–1536–45F
IF17Other expertsLawyer15–2546–55M
IF18PortDirector15–2546–55M
IF19Other expertsInsurance broker5–1536–45M
IF20Other expertsConsultant5–1536–45M
Table 3. Coding summary.
Table 3. Coding summary.
Name of Node and Sub-NodesRespondentsReferencesTotal Words
1. Definition and terminology 882972
 1.1. Nautical tourism2029
 1.2. Nautical tourist2059
2. Strategy 592212
 2.1. Strategic planning existence1833
 2.2. Public–private coordination1926
3. Measurement 1223765
 3.1. Accounting for nautical tourists2061
 3.2. Mooring control1950
 3.3. Abandoned vessels1011
4. Regulations 25734
 4.1. Discrepancy between regional, national and European regulation1725
5. Taxation 491568
 5.1. How it affects the sector1424
 5.2. Inequality with respect to competitive destinations1225
6. Illegal charter supply 541175
 6.1. Existence of illegal charter supply1632
 6.2. Measures adopted to combat illegal charter supply911
 6.3. Measurement of illegal charter supply911
7. Behaviour of the nautical tourist 201116
8. View of local community regarding nautical tourism 743178
 8.1. Opinions regarding nautical tourism development1944
 8.2. Awareness campaign1730
TOTAL2049116,720
Table 4. Key words, frequencies and core phrases for node 0.
Table 4. Key words, frequencies and core phrases for node 0.
Category (Node)Key WordsWord CountDepthCore Phrases
Definition and terminologyNautical993.33%“Nautical tourism is all that tourist activity developed by a navigator, either in its own boat or in a rental boat.” (IF7) “Nautical is all that has to do with the sea, diving, fishing, renting, sailing ... I would not include the cruises.” (IF8) “Nautical tourism is not defined internationally, there are even people who include fishing boats ...” (IF2)
Tourist762.56%“A nautical tourist can arrange a hotel and boat, but most of the time stays on board.” (IF3) “I do not consider that cruise tourists are nautical tourists in any case.” (IF15) “A nautical tourist is anyone who uses a boat for their vacation that can be rented or owned and could be a foreigner or a person who lives here.” (IF5) “To carry out the research we have not considered the resident as a nautical tourist.” (IF2)
Activity481.61%“It doesn’t mean remaining in a single port but a movement regardless of whether it is going to another port or another cove or anchorage. It involves activity.” (IF3) “The problem is that when you talk about nautical tourism you see a very wide range of activities and it is so varied that it covers everything.” (IF13) “Nautical tourism is a transversal activity that affects a lot of sectors. Internationally the satellite account of tourism has solved it defining the main activities that includes tourism and then each country or region defines the secondary activities. The day we have to face that, the first thing that we are going to do is define the border of what is nautical tourism.” (IF11)
Table 5. Key words, frequencies and core phrases for node 1.
Table 5. Key words, frequencies and core phrases for node 1.
Category (Node)Key WordsWord CountDepthCore Phrases
StrategySector441.99%“The sector is very atomized, there has been a lot of unfair competition. (IF3) “Lately we see that the Administration is more aware of the importance of the sector, especially the repair sector. Vessel maintenance is the most important industry in the Balearic Islands” (IF12) “That is the great challenge that the sector has to solve, there is a lot of watertight compartments, there are many regulations, many ministries ... everyone has competences.” (IF13)
Destination210.95%“The current Administration is doing its utmost to make nautical tourists choose other destinations.” (IF7) “The ATB makes a promotional effort to sell the destination but does not sell a particular port.” (IF10) “The big problem is that there is no strategic plan in the image of other destinations like France. We are much worse.” (IF1)
Association200.90%“A federation of nautical associations was created but it did not work, each one has its own interests. It is important to join.” (IF5) “Increasingly, the associations speak with each other and with the Conselleria.” (IF1, IF6) “The only major effort to promote the destination has gone hand in hand with private initiatives, chamber of commerce, associations and companies. There is no public–private coordination.” (IF17)
Table 6. Key words, frequencies and core phrases for node 2.
Table 6. Key words, frequencies and core phrases for node 2.
Category (Node)Key WordsWord CountDepth Core Phrases
MeasurementBoat601.50%“The only way to have data is through companies because they declare their business activities but private boats are not controllable. Tourists do not go to hotels, they sleep on the boat and are out of any control.” (IF4) “Abandoned vessels have been a real problem during the crisis. A cabined boat abandoned in a mooring is considered a dwelling and cannot be smoothed or moved without a warrant. This can pose an environmental hazard and at the same time the ports stop making money by not being able to rent the mooring to another boat.” (IF20) “In small boats overbooking of moorings is usual because there is always a hole to put it. As far as I know the overcrowding of moorings is not recorded. (IF18)
Port441.16%“In Maritime Capitania they have controlled all the registrations. In the nautical ports and clubs before you had to give all the names, but now only ask for documentation of the boat and skipper, the truth is that I do not know how the number of tourists is estimated.” (IF6) “The ideal way to measure them is to go port by port and to make a good satellite account of nautical tourism that contemplates supply and demand and not only measures the direct but also the indirect effects” (IF17) “In all ports there is an entry sheet used for police and tax control purposes, but it is not used statistically. It would be enough if the Conselleria had a copy of these sheets” (IF13)
Data340.90%“We have not been asked for data at any moment, I do not know where they get them.” (IF5, IF15) “We here carry the main statistics of tourism and we rely on the data of Frontur that evaluates the number of tourists and the expense. If the tourists come on their yacht or private plane is out of our reach. To measure it well it would have to do the survey in ports and nautical clubs and, as far as I know, in this community that has never been done.” (IF10) “The register of vessel registrations and de-registrations would give us data of the current fleet but once that fleet is in motion ... I can only think that they could cross that data with a computerized record of all the entrances and exits of all the ports.” (IF2)
Table 7. Key words, frequencies and core phrases for node 3.
Table 7. Key words, frequencies and core phrases for node 3.
Category (Node)Key WordsWord CountDepth Core Phrases
RegulationLegislation111.50%“That is the great problem of the nautical sector, that there is no homogenous nor normalized legislation.” (IF4) “All the associations of European superyachts are trying to make Brussels contemplate the normalization of all the legislation that affects us.” (IF14)
Homogeneous70.95%“When I went to Brussels we were supported by political parties and tended towards homogeneity of the legislation, but, on the other hand, the EU could not force state members to do so” (IF6)
Restrictive60.82%“The cause why some vessels have not come to Spain yet is due to overly restrictive legislation. Now they are starting to come, but they have more complications to charter here than in France or Italy” (IF17) “European regulation is a little more generic, ... here it always seems that we do it in the most restrictive and harmful way for us” (IF5)
Table 8. Key words, frequencies and core phrases for node 4.
Table 8. Key words, frequencies and core phrases for node 4.
Category (Node)Key WordsWord CountDepthCore Phrases
TaxationTax261.65%“We have the registration tax that in the rest of Europe does not exist.” (IF9) “Excessive taxes, useless taxes and exaggerated security controls are what most affect the sector.” (IF7) “A high VAT tax of 21% favors the appearance of illegal offer.” (IF16)
Countries161.02%“There are charter companies located in other countries to pay less taxes but they embark nautical tourists here.” (IF14) “Spain was one of the countries with most shipyards, but taxation, and the prejudices of against luxury sector, jeopardized this sector.” (IF16)
Competitive90.57%“In order for the nautical sector to be more competitive, it is necessary to bring the regulations into line with those of other countries.” (IF1) “We have a sector affected by a competitive situation at a clear disadvantage” (IF4)
Table 9. Key words, frequencies and core phrases for node 5.
Table 9. Key words, frequencies and core phrases for node 5.
Category (Node)Key WordsWord CountDepthCore Phrases
Illegal supplyCharter292.47%“Even though they have to appear on a register, there is a lot of charter companies that are not authorized. We have a serious piracy problem.” (IF8) “Yacht charter is in the same heading of the rent of other means of transport and taxed with its same VAT.” (IF2)
Illegal221.87%“Illegal means that the boats are not registered in the sixth list, usually individuals who rent and do not meet safety requirements.” (IF16) “Capitania only controls the legal boats. In the illegal, there is no control.” (IF6)
Competition60.51%“The truth is that this sector is very atomized. There has been a lot of unfair competition and zero support.” (IF3) “There are whole fleets of other countries that declare taxes in their countries but the service is provided here, it is totally unfair competition.” (IF1)
Table 10. Key words, frequencies and core phrases for node 6.
Table 10. Key words, frequencies and core phrases for node 6.
Category (Node)Key WordsWord CountDepthCore Phrases
Behavior of touristsCustomer302.69%“Thanks to the Internet we have started to have customers from all over the world. Those from eastern countries have been added to the traditional markets.” (IF3) “The tendency is hiring fewer days, spending more money but sailing less, and customers with less experience.” (IF8)
Crisis80.71%“Crisis has increased demand for last-minute offers and there are more rentals for a day or a week.” (IF16) “Because of the crisis, there is more sale of boats for charter than for individual consumption” (IF13)
Expenditure70.63%“We usually rent yachts of large length with an expense between €10,000 and €20,000 per week.” (IF1) “When we calculated the impact on the expenditure from the demand side, in the case of the residents it was very difficult to locate them and only the supply was taken into account.” (IF2)
Table 11. Key words, frequencies and core phrases for node 7.
Table 11. Key words, frequencies and core phrases for node 7.
Category (Node)Key WordsWord CountDepthCore Phrases
View of local commuinityResident571.79%“Residents have no idea that in this company there are over 3000 workers carrying out boat maintenance. It is the largest industry on the island.” (IF8) “Demagogic discourses that do not correspond to reality have been built up. The majority of ports, clubs and marinas are considered as urban spaces that residents can also enjoy and, despite that, we have a bad public image.” (IF13)
Knowledge321.00%“There is lack of knowledge of the benefits of the sector. People just see that it is something that belongs to rich people and it bothers them.” (IF9) “When I was in the Chamber of Commerce I tried to publicize nautical activity for students, but I didn’t receive any support. The local community lives with its back turned to the sea.”(IF6)
Posidonia160.51%“The environmental impact is much less than people think. The boats do not like to anchor on the Posidonia seabed, they prefer sandy sea floors.” (IF1) “Forty years ago the ports were built without any environmental study but today much care is taken. What is destroying the Posidonia meadows are the outfall pipes and nobody talks about it.” (IF14)
Table 12. Summary.
Table 12. Summary.
NodesKey WordsDepthWords
Definition and terminologyNautical–Tourist–Activity7.50%2972
StrategySector–Destination–Association3.84%2212
MeasurementBoat–Port–Data3.65%3765
RegulationLegislation–Homogeneous–Restrictive3.27%734
TaxationTax–Countries–Competitive3.24%1568
Illegal supplyCharter–Illegal–Competition4.85%1175
Behaviour of touristsCustomer–Crisis–Expenditure4.03%1116
View of local communityResident–Knowledge–Posidonia3.30%3178
TOTALS 4.35%16,720

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moreno, M.J.; Otamendi, F.J. Fostering Nautical Tourism in the Balearic Islands. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2215. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122215

AMA Style

Moreno MJ, Otamendi FJ. Fostering Nautical Tourism in the Balearic Islands. Sustainability. 2017; 9(12):2215. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122215

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moreno, María J., and F. Javier Otamendi. 2017. "Fostering Nautical Tourism in the Balearic Islands" Sustainability 9, no. 12: 2215. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122215

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop