Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Beijing Subway’s New Fare Policy on Riders’ Attitude, Travel Pattern and Demand
Previous Article in Journal
Neighborhood Walking and Social Capital: The Correlation between Walking Experience and Individual Perception of Social Capital
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of the Microbial Viability of Soil Samples from Maize Crops in Freeze-Storage under Different Management Conditions in a Semi-Arid Climate

1
Departamento de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Extremadura, Avda de Elvas, 06071 Badajoz, Spain
2
Área de Edafología y Química Agrícola, Facultad de Ciencias and IACYS, Universidad de Extremadura, Avda de Elvas s/n, 06071 Badajoz, Spain
3
Área de Producción Vegetal (Escuela de Ingenierías Agrarias) and IACYS, Universidad de Extremadura, Ctra. de Cáceres, 06071 Badajoz, Spain
4
Instituto Politécnico de Portalegre, Escola Superior Agrária de Elvas, Apartado 254, 7350 Elvas, Portugal
5
Universidade de Lisboa, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, LEAF, Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal
6
CIEO—Centre for Spatial and Organizational Dynamics, Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2017, 9(5), 690; https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050690
Submission received: 7 February 2017 / Revised: 19 April 2017 / Accepted: 21 April 2017 / Published: 27 April 2017

Abstract

:
The effect of freeze-storage on culturable soil microorganism viability was determined for soil samples from three agricultural maize crop systems (under conventional management, direct seeding, and direct seeding with a cover crop). Most culturable soil bacteria were unaffected by the freeze-thaw stress or the prolonged freeze-storage, but the viability of mold and Bacillus mycoides populations decreased drastically after eight months of freeze-storage, limiting the process sustainability to this period. However, these changes did not significantly affect either the total microorganism biodiversity index or the biodiversity differences between treatment. Based on the available results, freeze-storage seems to be a sustainable process for up to eight months that can be allowed in analyses of culturable microbial population biodiversity.

1. Introduction

When the immediate assay of soil samples is unfeasible, recommendations for soil handling often include refrigeration or freezing in the interim between collection and assay, even if the storage period is likely to be short, although this may perturb soil microbial community [1]. Whereas the ISO standard [2] explicitly warns against freezing as a soil storage method for the laboratory assessment of aerobic microbial processes, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) guideline [3] suggests that soils can be freeze-stored (−20 °C ± 2 °C) for one year. Some studies have shown that freeze-storage is a more sustainable process than cold storage for monitoring microbial biomass (i.e., Stenberg et al. [4]). In this case, it is important to determine the effect of freeze-storage on the survival of culturable soil microorganisms for later microbial population analysis. This effect has been studied indirectly by focusing on particular microbial activities such as methidathion degradation [5], nitrification and denitrification [6,7,8], and hydrocarbon biodegradation [9]. Also, the soil microbial biomass has been measured by the substrate-induced respiration (SIR) method [10] after frozen and cold storage. All these studies showed that freeze-thaw stress affects soil microbial populations, reducing or increasing some biological activities [8,11], and changing microbial diversity [5,12]. In addition, other studies have indicated preservation methods should be accurately evaluated for each soil before DNA extraction [13,14]. In this sense, Wang et al. found that while soil storage at −20 °C without reconditioning was the best for drained soils, storage at 4 °C with reconditioning was the best for flooded soils [15] and the study of Rubin et al., clearly states that the storage time and temperature affect the bacterial community composition and its structure, pointing to the importance of our own study [16].
It is generally believed that only a small proportion of the species within soil microbial communities can be cultured and isolated using standard laboratory media [17]. Several non-culturing procedures that depend on nucleic acid extraction and PCR gene amplification are being widely used to overcome that experimental limitation, and indeed molecular techniques have become the preferred approach to analyze soil microbial community structure and dynamics [18,19]. However, discrepancies have been found between culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Both techniques result in a certain bias, resolving different fractions of bacterial communities [20,21]. The results of the two strategies are complementary and can be highly useful to assess microbial community stability in soil [21,22,23]. Also, it has been proposed that culturable bacteria are very important to the soil ecosystem because they are alive and have high metabolic activity [18]. Moreover, it might be possible that the proportion of viable-but-non-culturable soil bacteria is less than it generally appears, and that most dominant non-culturable bacteria were actually non-viable forms of the culturable ones. These non-viable bacteria accumulate in the soil after vegetative growth, waiting for, or already involved in, an eventual degradation process. The accumulation of their ribosomal DNA (rDNA) in the soil leads to the false-positive identification of non-existing bacteria because of the synthesis of a high proportion of rDNA chimeras in the 16S rDNA gene amplification process [24]. Culturable bacteria may therefore be considered as responsive indicators of physical, chemical, and biological changes in the soil environment.
The culture-based approach to measuring microbial parameters is still used by soil microbiologists, including soil dilution and plate colony counts [25], rates of utilization of the carbon sources in plates [26], measurements of some functional groups such as ammonifying and nitrifying bacteria [27], and even the utilization of molecular techniques to measure culturable microorganisms [28]. Frequently, however, it is impossible to perform these analyses immediately after sampling, and freeze-storage is required for the process to be sustainable. In order to obtain a considerable quantity of these microorganisms for the optimum development of this study, we opt for a culture with a high Carbon/Nitrogen (C/N) ratio as, under these conditions, microorganisms with high energy available use nitrogen and other essential elements to develop and multiply, since microorganisms develop by mineralizing organic matter. According to Silva et al., the highest C/N ratio crops that incite an optimum microorganism development are monocultures of sorghum and maize [29] and, for cultural reasons, we opted for the latter. Dignam et al. stated that soil microorganisms must be thoroughly studied in order to develop plans of action that lead to the understanding of the functional potential and properties of soil microbiomes, as this affects pasture productivity [30]. Meanwhile, Bahadur et al.states that using microorganisms as a bio-inoculant is a good practice in agricultural biotechnology for sustainable crop production [31]. Also, Kumari et al. comment that microorganisms solubilize K, making it more available to plant life [32]. The study of Ciancio et al. demonstrated that, among other microbiological life, specific Bacillus subtilis strains interfere with fungi, Trichoderma sp., and the soil-borne Ralstonia solanacearum pathogen colonization, thus defending the installed culture [33]. Additionally, the latter study stated that bacterial metabolites may also protect plants by inhibiting herbivores. Agricultural activity is responsible for shaping the microbial communities in the agro-ecosystem, as the study performed by Embarcadero-Jiménez et al. [34] illustrates, and, as stated by Bender et al., agricultural ecosystem sustainability can be restored by stimulating soil life [35] (in that soil biodiversity supports several ecosystem functions simultaneously, underpinning its crucial role in ecosystems worldwide). We therefore conclude, along the same lines as Keesstra et al. [36] and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (Convention on Biological Diversity) [37], that the microorganisms present in soil contribute largely to the soil’s sustainability and that, thus, they should be thoroughly studied. Accordingly, we evaluated the effects of freeze-storage and thawing on the viability and biodiversity of the culturable microbial population of maize crop soils and the overall process sustainability under three different management conditions over a period of 44 months.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Site

The study was carried out on a stony district luvisol with 210 g·kg−1 clay, 300 g·kg−1 silt, 490 g·kg−1 sand, organic C 19 g·kg−1, total N 1.23 g·kg−1, aggregate stability 44.9%, soil penetration resistance 7.5 MPa, actual water content 0.30 cm3, and pH 5.3. Particle size distribution was determined by sedimentation using the pipette method after organic carbon destruction with H2O2 and chemical dispersion using Na4P2O7. The organic carbon was determined by dichromate oxidation. The pH was measured in 1:1 (w/v) soil/water using a combination electrode. Aggregate stability was determined in 1–2 mm air-dry aggregates using a single 0.250-mm sieve and an apparatus with a stroke length of 1.3 cm and frequency of 35 cycles min−1, and sodium hydroxide as a dispersant. The soil penetration resistance was measured using a hand penetrometer with a 1-cm2 conical tip. The experimental field was located in south-western Spain (39°06′N; 5°40′W), where the climate is Mediterranean with a mean annual precipitation of 480 mm, and very hot and dry summers, and an aridity index of 0.49 according to UNESCO [38]. Before beginning this research, the experimental area (3500 m2) was already cropped with maize (Zea mays L.) under irrigation using conventional tillage management (deep ploughing prior to planting). After harvesting the maize at the beginning of this study, the field was divided into twelve plots of approximately 200 m2 (20 × 10 m) each, that were subjected to three different management regimes: conventional tillage (CT), and two no-till management systems: direct seeding without a cover crop (DS) and direct seeding with a lopsided oat (Avena strigosa) cover crop (DSC). Each treatment was replicated four times in a completely randomized design. The soils from the three management regimes had low K (<0.5 cmolc·kg−1, extracted with 1 M NH4OAc at pH 7, and assayed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry) and low pH. They mainly differed at the end of the sampling period in total organic carbon content (10.9, 13.1, and 13.2 g·kg−1), volumetric soil water content (0.19, 0.23, and 0.25 cm3·cm−3), total N (1.23, 1.30, and 1.46 g·kg−1), and Olsen available P (37.2, 32.5, and 39.9 mg·kg−1 for the CT-, DS-, and DSC-soils, respectively). The differences were significant for all these parameters in the three soils, and positive correlations had previously been found between the amount of soil microorganisms and the organic carbon or water content [39].

2.2. Soil Sampling and Analysis

Three years after the initiation of each soil management, five soil sub-samples from each plot were taken randomly from a 10-cm depth with a sterile trowel, and placed into sterile bags. The sub-samples from each plot were composited (roughly 2 kg). A total of four composited samples were obtained from each soil management, thus giving a total of twelve composited samples (four replications for each soil management). Samples were taken in October, after harvest, when the microbial population was the greatest (unpublished previous results). Samples were returned to the lab under refrigeration, and passed through a 2-mm sterile sieve for four hours before sampling. A before-freeze-storage microbial population analysis was performed for each sample (see below). Then, 50-g aliquots were freeze-stored at −20 °C. The aliquots were thawed at room temperature every 2 months. Properly diluted (10−4–10−7) soil aliquots were inoculated onto two rich culture media, TSA (Triptone Soy Agar) and YEPD (Yeast Extract Peptone Dextrose), for the microbial population analysis. The highest soil sample dilution (10−6 and 10−7) facilitated the detection of slow-growth microorganisms by reducing the effect of overgrowth by fast-growing microorganisms. The plates were incubated at 25 °C for up to 10 days to detect slow-growth microorganisms. After colony counting, the data from the two culture media were combined prior to analysis.

2.3. DNA Extraction from Cultured Bacteria, PCR Amplification, Sequencing of 16S Ribosomal DNA, and Bacteria Identification

Bacteria were cultured in YEPD and TSA media, and five colonies of each bacterial morphological type were independently lysed by freeze-thawing [40]. The PCR was performed directly from lysed bacteria or purified soil DNA with the kit pReTaq Ready-To-Go PCR Beads (Amersham, Biosciences), with the 16S rDNA specific bacterial primers 27F (fD1) and 907R [41]. The thermocycler protocol was an initial denaturation step of 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturing at 95 °C for 15 s, annealing at 55 °C for 15 s, an extension at 72 °C for 2 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min [42]. As a preliminary step for the DNA sequencing, samples were purified with the “Jetquick PCR purification Spin Kit” (Genomed, Löhne, Germany) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. The purified rDNA PCR fragment from each isolated microorganism was sent to a sequencing service (Secugen S.L., Madrid, Spain) on a BigDye Terminator v3.1 sequencer. The partial 16S rDNA sequences were checked with the software Chromas v. 1.45 (http://www.technelysium.com.au/chromas.html) in order to correct sequencing mistakes, and were screened against those in GenBank/EMBL by using BLAST [43]. Sequences with >99% similarity to previously published data available at NCBI (http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) were clustered into the same operational taxonomic unit (OTU). Sequences with <99% similarity to previously published data were less than 10% and were not considered for further analysis.

2.4. Biodiversity and Statistical Analysis

Simpson’s reciprocal index of diversity [44] was used as a measure of the soil microbial diversity. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Duncan test (at p < 0.05) for equality of means were used to detect significant differences. Normality and homogeneity of variances were checked by using Levene’s test.

3. Results and Discussion

A total of 41 bacterial morphological types were identified de visu according to colony (form, margin, texture, opacity, color) and cell morphology (shape, sporulation capability, Gram staining). After 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing of five isolated colonies of each bacterial morphological type, they were regrouped into 25 bacterial OTUs (operational taxonomic units), in addition to one common group for all the unidentified filamentous fungi (molds) in the sum of all culture media plates inoculated with the soil samples (Table 1). To validate the morphological-type differentiation, ten new isolates of each OTU (a total of 250 newly isolated colonies) were identified by 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing, obtaining a fairly low total error of 4.02% in the assignment of each colony to one of the previously defined OTUs. The genera with the greatest number of different species were Streptomyces (five species), Pseudomonas (seven species), and Bacillus (five species). The most relatively abundant bacteria were Acinetobacter (9.3%), Arthrobacter (13.2%), and Stenotrophomonas (14.4%); and the least frequent were Staphylococcus, Microbacterium, and Janthinobacterium (less than 1%). The amount of cultured mold was almost 2% of the total cultured microorganisms.
Most bacterial populations were unaffected by the freezing time or the freeze-thaw stress. After 44 months of freeze-storage, the number of colonies remained the same for 24 out of the 25 bacterial OTUs analyzed (Figure 1a). The exception was the sporulating Bacillus mycoides, extensively present in the three studied soils, of which the colony number decreased after eight months of freeze-storage to 25% of the population compared to before freeze-storage (Figure 1b), and the molds, which decreased to become undetectable after 44 months (Figure 1c). The loss of viability of B. mycoides and mold populations may be because they have no time to sporulate before freezing, with the vegetative cells being more sensitive to freeze-storage than their spores or the rest of the cultured bacteria. The decreasing viability trend was similar for the B. mycoides and mold populations in the three soils, independently of their different total organic carbon content, which was lower in the conventional management (10.9 g·kg−1) than in the direct seeding and direct seeding with cover crop soils (13.1 and 13.2 g·kg−1, respectively). In agreement with our results, inactivation of vegetative B. subtilis cells upon −25 °C freezing has been reported previously [45,46]. This sensitivity might be reduced if soil samples were dehydrated before storage, allowing cells to live on a much reduced metabolism [47]. However, with this procedure sample handling would take longer, losing part of the advantage of rapid sample freeze-storage. Despite the fact that irreversible changes in microbiological soil characteristics can occur after freezing and thawing, and that freezing soil samples prior to analysis has not been recommended for the investigation of specific microbial communities such as Archaea [5], it seems that the overall situation in our soils is rather satisfactory after freeze-storage. This is, although a decrease was observed in the cell viability of culturable B. mycoides and filamentous fungi, they only represented <1% and <2%, respectively, of the total microbial populations of the three treatments. On the contrary, the viability of the rest of the culturable bacteria, which represented the great majority, did not change throughout the freeze-storage period. Consequently, the slight decrease in the Simpson’s diversity index of the total microbial populations after 44 months of freeze-storage was in no case statistically significant (p > 0.05), and the biodiversity remained significantly greater in the soil under direct seeding with a cover crop than in the soil under conventional management or the soil under direct seeding (Figure 2). As in most other soil microbial analyses, we might be missing a fraction of the soil culturable bacteria, i.e., those that grow extremely slow, are present at an extremely low frequency, or are not culturable in the media we used. This caveat notwithstanding, for a soil microbiologist it is very interesting to observe that the most frequent culturable bacteria could be freeze-stored for further analysis without any major loss of cell viability, and that this was unaffected by the regime of soil management applied. Due to its high C/N ratio, the chosen crop (corn) allowed microorganisms to develop in full. Other crops could have been used (i.e., sorghum or a gramineae/leguminosae consociation) but, because they have an equal or lower C/N ratio, according to Silva et al. [29], than that of the chosen crop, the number of obtained microorganisms would be expectantly lower than that obtained. Optimum microorganism development is crucial, as it contributes in a decisive way to improve soil quality and sustainability according to previous studies [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37] and, as we stated before, the freeze-thaw process did not affect most of the bacterial populations for a period of 44 months. However, one should keep in mind that, while one might expect the results to be very reproducible when working with similar soil microbial communities and environmental conditions, somehow different results could be obtained when studying very different soil microbial communities, principally because the effect of freeze-storage on the average cell viability of a given microbial community may well depend on its species composition.

4. Conclusions

Freeze-storage at −20 °C was suitable for the storage of the most abundant cultured bacteria of the three soils studied. However, it was inappropriate for preserving the filamentous fungi and B. mycoides populations for longer than eight months, which can be mitigated if the soil samples are dehydrated before storage. Therefore, freeze-storage for up to eight months seems to be a sustainable process allowable in analyses of microbial population biodiversity, and should be reasonably acceptable for comparisons of different treatments within the same soil, given that the diversity indices of the total microorganism populations in the present study were not significantly affected. Although other studies [5] have suggested that the freeze-thaw process of soil samples should be avoided, our study did not find evidence for such a claim and, as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (Convention on Biological Diversity) [37] and other studies [33,34,35,36] have stated, the microorganisms present in the soil contribute largely to the soil’s sustainability and, thus, more studies on the preservation of this biological life should be perpetrated.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support given by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology (project AGL 2000-0463-P4-05) and the Extremadura Regional Government (project 2P04B003), and also the support given to Ana Muñoz, who received a grant from the Extremadura Regional Government, Spain, and to Luis Loures as a Post-Doc fellow at GORSAS (Research Group on Soils, Water and Sediments Management, Conservation and Recovery)—Universidad de Extremadura.

Author Contributions

Manuel Ramírez, Ana Muñoz and Antonio López-Piñeiro designed the research and performed the analysis, Manuel Ramirez, António López-Piñeiro, Luis Loures, and José Nunes analyzed the data; Ana Muñoz, Ángel Albarrán, David Peña, José Gama and Luis Loures contributed with analysis tools and wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

CTconventional tillage
DSdirect seeding
DSCdirect seeding with a lopsided cover crop
OUToperational taxonomic unit
rDNARibosomal DNA
SIRSubstrate-Induced Respiration
TSATriptone Soy Agar

References

  1. Verchot, L.V. Cold storage of a tropical soil decreases nitrification potential. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1999, 63, 1942–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). Sampling Part 6: Guidance on collection, handling and storage of soil for assessment of aerobic microbial processes in the laboratory. In Soil Quality; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1993; pp. 10381–10386. [Google Scholar]
  3. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). Draft Report of the OECD Workshop on Selection of Soil/Sediments; OECD: Belgirate, Italy, 1995; pp. 29–35. [Google Scholar]
  4. Stenberg, B.; Johansson, M.; Pell, M.; Sjodahl-Svensson, K.; Stenstrom, J.; Torstensson, L. Microbial biomass and activities in soil as affected by frozen and cold storage. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1998, 30, 393–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pesaro, M.; Widmer, F.; Nicollier, G.; Zeyer, J. Effects of freeze-thaw stress during soil storage on microbial communities and methidathion degradation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2003, 35, 1049–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Christensen, S.; Tiedje, J.M. Brief and vigorous N2O production by soil at spring thaw. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 1990, 41, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ludwig, B.; Wolf, I.; Teepe, R. Contribution of nitrification and denitrification to the emission of N2O in a freeze-thaw event in an agricultural soil. J. Plant Nutr. 2004, 167, 678–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sharma, S.; Szele, Z.; Schilling, R.; Munch, J.C.; Schloter, M. Influence of freeze-thaw stress on the structure and function of microbial communities and denitrifying populations in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 2148–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Eriksson, M; Ka, J.O.; Mohn, W.W. Effects of low temperature and freeze-thaw cycles on hydrocarbon biodegradation in Arctic tundra soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 5107–5112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Anderson, J.P.E. Handling and storage of soils for pesticide experiments. In Pesticide Effects on Soil Microflora; Somerville, L., Greaves, M.P., Eds.; Taylor and Francis: London, UK, 1987; pp. 45–60. [Google Scholar]
  11. Trabue, S.L.; Palmquist, D.E.; Lydick, T.M.; Singles, S.K. Effects of soil storage on the microbial community and degradation of metsulfuron-methyl. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Morley, C.R.; Trofymow, J.A.; Coleman, C.; Cambardella, C. Effects of freeze-thaw stress on bacterial populations in soil microcosms. Microb. Ecol 1983, 9, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rissanen, A.J.; Kurhela, E.; Aho, T.; Oittinen, T.; Tiirola, M. Storage of environmental samples for guaranteeing nucleic acid yields for molecular microbiological studies. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 88, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tatangelo, V.; Franzetti, A.; Gandolfi, I.; Bestetti, G.; Ambrosini, R. Effect of preservation method on the assessment of bacterial community structure in soil and water samples. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2014, 356, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, J.; Chapman, S.J.; Yao, H. The effect of storage on microbial activity and bacterial community structure of drained and flooded paddy soil. J. Soil Sediments 2015, 15, 880–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rubin, B.E.; Gibbons, S.M.; Kennedy, S.; Hampton-Marcell, J.; Owens, S.; Gilbert, J.A. Investigating the impact of storage conditions on microbial community composition in soil samples. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e70460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Janssen, P.H.; Yates, P.S.; Grinton, B.E.; Taylor, P.M.; Sait, M. Improved culturability of soil bacteria and isolation in pure culture of novel members of the divisions Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 2391–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ellis, R.J.; Morgan, P.; Weightman, A.J.; Fry, J.C. Cultivation-dependent and -independent approaches for determining bacterial diversity in heavy-metal-contaminated soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 3223–3230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Rastogi, G.; Sani, R.K. Molecular techniques to assess microbial community structure, function, and dynamics in the environment. In Microbes and Microbial Technology; Ahmad, I., Ahmad, F., Pichtel, J., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 29–57. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hugenholtz, P.; Goebel, B.M.; Pace, N.R. Impact of culture-Independent studies on the emerging phylogenetic view of bacterial diversity. J. Bacteriol. 1998, 180, 4765–4774. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Edenborn, S.L.; Sexstone, A.J. DGGE fingerprinting of culturable soil bacterial communities complements culture-independent analyses. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2007, 39, 1570–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kisand, V.; Wikner, J. Combining culture-dependent and -independent methodologies for estimation of richness of estuarine bacterioplankton consuming riverine dissolved organic matter. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 3607–3616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Imfeld, G.; Vuilleumier, S. Measuring the effects of pesticides on bacterial communities in soil: A critical review. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2012, 49, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, G.C.Y.; Wang, Y. Frequency of formation of chimeric molecules as a consequence of PCR coamplification of 16S rRNA genes from mixed bacterial genomes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 4645–4650. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Chroni, C.; Kyriacou, A.; Manios, T.; Lasaridi, K.E. Investigation of the microbial community structure and activity as indicators of compost stability and composting process evolution. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 3745–3750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Pham, V.H.; Kim, J. Cultivation of unculturable soil bacteria. Trends Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 475–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Truu, M.; Juhanson, J.; Truu, J. Microbial biomass, activity and community composition in constructed wetlands. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 3958–3971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Fakruddin, M.; Mannan, K. Methods for analyzing diversity of microbial communities in natural environments. Ceylon J. Sci. 2013, 42, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Da Silva, P.C.G.; Foloni, J.S.S.; Fabris, L.B.; Tiritan, C.S. Fitomassa e relação C/N em consórcios de sorgo e milho com espécies de cobertura. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2009, 44, 1504–1512. (In Portuguese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dignam, B.E.; O’Callaghan, M.; Condron, L.M.; Raaijmakers, J.M.; Kowalchuk, G.A.; Wakelin, S.A. Challenges and opportunities in harnessing soil disease suppressiveness for sustainable pasture production. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016, 95, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bahadur, I.; Maurya, B.R.; Kumar, A.; Meena, V.S.; Raghuwanshi, R. Towards the soil sustainability and potassium-solubilizing microorganisms. In Potassium Solubilizing Microorganisms for Sustainable Agriculture; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2016; pp. 255–266. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kumari, S.; Varma, A.; Tuteja, N.; Choudhary, D.K. Bacterial ACC-deaminase: An Eco-friendly Strategy to Cope Abiotic Stresses for Sustainable Agriculture. In Plant-Microbe Interaction: An Approach to Sustainable Agriculture; Springer: Singapore, 2016; pp. 165–185. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ciancio, A.; Corné, M.J.P.; Jesús, M.-B. Editorial: Harnessing useful rhizosphere microorganisms for pathogen and pest biocontrol. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Embarcadero-Jiménez, S.; Flor, N.R.-O.; Wang, E.N. Bacterial communities estimated by pyrosequencing in the soils of chinampa, a traditional sustainable agro-ecosystem in Mexico. J. Soils Sediments 2016, 16, 1001–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bender, S.F.; Cameron, W.; Van der Marcel, G.A.H. An underground revolution: biodiversity and soil ecological engineering for agricultural sustainability. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2016, 31, 440–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Keesstra, S.D.; Quinton, J.N.; van der Putten, W.H.; Bardgett, R.D.; Fresco, L.O. The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Soil 2016, 2, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wolff, F.; Timo, K. The UN Convention on biological diversity and soils: Status and future options. In International Yearbook of Soil Law and Policy 2016; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 129–148. [Google Scholar]
  38. UNESCO (The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). Map of the World Distribution of Arid Regions; MAB Technical Notes 7; UNESCO: Paris, France, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  39. Muñoz, A.; López-Piñeiro, A.; Ramírez, M. Soil quality attributes as influenced by conservation management regimes in semi-arid regions, south-western Spain. Soil Tillage Res. 2007, 95, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ron, Z.; Kohler, R.E.; Davis, B.D. Polysomes extracted from Escherichia coli by freeze-thaw-lysozyme lysis. Science 1966, 153, 1119–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Lane, D.J. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics; Goodfellow, E.S.M., Stackebrant, E., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: London, UK, 1991; pp. 115–175. [Google Scholar]
  42. González, J.M.; Portillo, M.C.; Saiz-Jimenez, C. Multiple displacement amplification as a pre-polymerase chain reaction (pre-PCR) to process difficult to amplify samples and low copy number sequences from natural environments. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 7, 1024–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Altschul, S.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Camargo, F.A.O.; Okeke, B.C.; Bento, F.M.; Frankenberger, W.T. Diversity of chromium-resistant bacteria isolated from soils contaminated with dichromate. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2005, 29, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shen, T.; Urrutia Benet, G.; Brul, S.; Knorr, D. Influence of high-pressure–low-temperature treatment on the inactivation of Bacillus subtilis cells. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2005, 6, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shen, T.; Bos, A.P.; Brul, S. Assessing freeze–thaw and high pressure low temperature induced damage to Bacillus subtilis cells with flow cytometry. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2009, 10, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Seki, K.; Horikawa, D.D. Diversity of Tardigrada. In Biodiversity in Agricultural Production Systems; Benckiser, G., Schnell, S., Eds.; CRC/Taylor and Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA; London, UK, 2007; pp. 237–247. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Percentage of the original colony-forming units (cfu) remaining after freeze-storage. Bacterial populations excepting Bacillus mycoides (a); Bacillus mycoides (b); and filamentous fungi (molds) (c). Conventional soil management (CT-soil) (●), direct seeding (DS-soil) (▲), and direct seeding with a cover crop (DSC-soil) (■). Data are shown as mean ± standard error of four replicates for each soil management regime.
Figure 1. Percentage of the original colony-forming units (cfu) remaining after freeze-storage. Bacterial populations excepting Bacillus mycoides (a); Bacillus mycoides (b); and filamentous fungi (molds) (c). Conventional soil management (CT-soil) (●), direct seeding (DS-soil) (▲), and direct seeding with a cover crop (DSC-soil) (■). Data are shown as mean ± standard error of four replicates for each soil management regime.
Sustainability 09 00690 g001
Figure 2. Simpson’s diversity index of total microbial populations of the soil under the three management regimes: before freeze-storage ( Sustainability 09 00690 i001); after eight months of freeze-storage ( Sustainability 09 00690 i002); and after 44 months of freeze-storage ( Sustainability 09 00690 i003). Columns in the same treatment with the same lower case letter were not significantly different at the p < 0.05 level. Columns for the same freeze-storage time in different soils with the same capital letter were not significantly different at the p < 0.05 level.
Figure 2. Simpson’s diversity index of total microbial populations of the soil under the three management regimes: before freeze-storage ( Sustainability 09 00690 i001); after eight months of freeze-storage ( Sustainability 09 00690 i002); and after 44 months of freeze-storage ( Sustainability 09 00690 i003). Columns in the same treatment with the same lower case letter were not significantly different at the p < 0.05 level. Columns for the same freeze-storage time in different soils with the same capital letter were not significantly different at the p < 0.05 level.
Sustainability 09 00690 g002
Table 1. Identification of the bacterial morphological types isolated in the culture media plates inoculated with the soil samples.
Table 1. Identification of the bacterial morphological types isolated in the culture media plates inoculated with the soil samples.
Type Colony MorphologySporesCell ShapeGramMicroorganism (OTU)
FormMarginTextureOpacityColor
T1CircularEntireShinyOpaqueWhiteNoCocci-rods+Arthrobacter dextranolyticus
T2CircularEntireShinyOpaqueYellowNoCocci-rods+Arthrobacter nicotinovorans
T3RhizoidCurledWrinkledOpaqueBeigeYesRods+Bacillus mycoides
T4IrregularEntireGranularOpaqueWhiteYesRods+Bacillus megaterium
T5IrregularEntireMucoidOpaqueBeigeYesRods+Bacillus simplex
T6IrregularLobateMucoidTranslucentBeigeYesRods+Bacillus subtilis
T7IrregularLobateGranularTranslucentBeigeYesRods+Bacillus thuringiensis
T8CircularEntireRoughOpaqueBeigeYesRods+Bacillus weihenstephanensis
T9IrregularEntireSmoothOpaqueBeigeNoRods-Chryseobacterium indologenes
T10CircularCurledWrinkledOpaqueVioletNoRods-Janthinobacterium lividum
T11CircularEntireSmoothOpaqueWhiteYesRods+Paenibacillus polymyxa
T12CircularEntireShinyTranslucentWhiteNoRods-Pantoea agglomerans
T13IrregularEntireSmoothTransparentn.a.NoRods-Pseudomonas cedrella
T14CircularEntireShinyOpaqueWhiteNoRods-Pseudomonas filiscindens
T15IrregularEntireRoughOpaqueBeigeNoRods-Pseudomonas fluorecens
T16CircularEntireShinyOpaqueBrownNoRods-Pseudomonas jessenii
T17CircularEntireShinyTranslucentBrownNoRods-Pseudomonas mediterranea
T18CircularEntireShinyOpaqueWhiteNoRods-Pseudomonas mosselii
T19CircularEntireShinyOpaqueBeigeNoRods-Pseudomonas synxantha
T20CircularEntireDullOpaqueWhiteNoCocci+Staphylococcus epidermidis
T21IrregularUndulatedWrinkledOpaqueBeigeYesLarge rods+Streptomyces scabrisporus
T22CircularEntireDustyOpaqueBeigeYesLarge rods+Streptomyces flavovirens
T23CircularEntireDustyOpaqueGreyYesLarge rods+Streptomyces xanthophaeus
T24CircularEntireDustyOpaqueWhiteYesLarge rods+Streptomyces ciscaucasicus
T25CircularEntireDustyOpaqueBrownYesLarge rods+Streptomyces griseoaurantiacus
OTU = operational taxonomic unit.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ramírez, M.; Muñoz, A.; López-Piñeiro, A.; Albarrán, Á.; Peña, D.; Nunes, J.M.R.; Gama, J.; Loures, L. Evaluation of the Microbial Viability of Soil Samples from Maize Crops in Freeze-Storage under Different Management Conditions in a Semi-Arid Climate. Sustainability 2017, 9, 690. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050690

AMA Style

Ramírez M, Muñoz A, López-Piñeiro A, Albarrán Á, Peña D, Nunes JMR, Gama J, Loures L. Evaluation of the Microbial Viability of Soil Samples from Maize Crops in Freeze-Storage under Different Management Conditions in a Semi-Arid Climate. Sustainability. 2017; 9(5):690. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050690

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ramírez, Manuel, Ana Muñoz, Antonio López-Piñeiro, Ángel Albarrán, David Peña, José Manuel Rato Nunes, José Gama, and Luis Loures. 2017. "Evaluation of the Microbial Viability of Soil Samples from Maize Crops in Freeze-Storage under Different Management Conditions in a Semi-Arid Climate" Sustainability 9, no. 5: 690. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050690

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop