Next Article in Journal
Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Agronomic Iodine Biofortification: A SWOT-AHP Analysis in Northern Uganda
Next Article in Special Issue
On Your Own: Older Adults’ Food Choice and Dietary Habits
Previous Article in Journal
Rationale for Dietary Antioxidant Treatment of ADHD
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dietary Fiber and Telomere Length in 5674 U.S. Adults: An NHANES Study of Biological Aging
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dietary Patterns and Their Relationship with Frailty in Functionally Independent Older Adults

1
Unidad de Investigación de Atención Primaria-OSIs Gipuzkoa, Osakidetza, 20014 San Sebastián, Spain
2
Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), 48902 Barakaldo, Spain
3
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Biodonostia, 20014 San Sebastián, Spain
4
Kronikgune- Centro de Investigación en Cronicidad, 48902 Barakaldo, Spain
5
Centro de salud de Beraun, Osakidetza, 20100 Rentería, Spain
6
Centro de salud de Alza, Osakidetza, 20017 San Sebastián, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2018, 10(4), 406; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10040406
Submission received: 30 January 2018 / Revised: 20 March 2018 / Accepted: 22 March 2018 / Published: 24 March 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutrition and Ageing)

Abstract

:
The impact of dietary patterns rather than single foods or nutrients on health outcomes is increasingly recognized. This cross-sectional study examines the dietary patterns of 527 non-institutionalized functionally independent older people aged ≥70 years from Gipuzkoa (Spain). Sociodemographic characteristics, health status, anthropometric measures and dietary data are collected. Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) and cluster analysis are performed to identify dietary patterns and groups of individuals. Frequency of selected food items and compliance with food recommendations are included in the MCA. A high proportion of the sample population are overweight or obese, whereas only 3.3% are at risk of malnutrition (determined with the Mini Nutritional Assessment). Frail individuals (n = 130), measured with the Timed-Up and Go test are older, have a lower educational level, are more obese, present a poorer health status (more depressive symptoms, polypharmacy and falls, among others) and worse compliance with food recommendations than robust individuals (n = 392). Three groups of individuals are identified: cluster one (n = 285), cluster two (n = 194) and cluster three (n = 48). A gradient of increasing frailty and poorer health status is observed from cluster one to cluster three. The latter also shows the poorest dietary pattern, regarding dietary recommendations. The use of an easy-to-use tool to assess diet allows detection of differences among the three clusters. There is a need to increase awareness on the implementation of nutritional screening and a subsequent dietary assessment in primary care settings to provide nutritional care to elder, and moreover, frail individuals.

1. Introduction

The aging of the population constitutes an important health challenge due to the increase in the life expectancy. Aging is a complex and multifactorial process accompanied by a series of physiological changes that lead to a progressive loss of adaptation to environmental demands and increasing vulnerability. One of the most severe expressions of aging is frailty [1]. Frailty is characterized by a progressive loss of functional capacity that can lead to dependence, institutionalization and death [2,3]. Unlike dependence, frailty may be reversible, and the effectiveness of interventions based on exercise, dietary improvement or control of polypharmacy is well known [4,5].
Diet is one of the pillars of health. Unhealthy diet constitutes an important risk factor for chronic pathologies, such as diabetes, cancer or cardiovascular diseases [6]. An inappropriate nutritional status increases the risk of frailty, in older people. More specifically, an insufficient consumption of protein and micronutrients like vitamin D, C and omega-3 fatty acids are associated with this condition [7,8,9]. Quite the reverse, the adherence to healthy dietary patterns, such as the Mediterranean diet, might be able to prevent it [8]. This dietary pattern is mainly characterized by an abundant consumption of plant food, with olive oil as a principal source of fat, high to moderate amounts of fish, moderate intake of eggs, poultry and dairy products and low consumption of red meat [10].
The assessment of dietary characteristics in older people constitutes a challenge. Aging is associated with short term memory loss that can alter their ability to remember all the food and drinks consumed and, consequently, underreporting of intake can be observed. Food frequency questionnaires, 24-hour dietary recall or 7-day food records [11] are some of the methods used for collecting food consumption data in such populations. However, to date, none of them have been incorporated into routine practice in primary care settings, mainly due to the amount of time required for their administration. The assessment of food intake, especially in the frail, is a key element in identifying which food groups are consumed inadequately. This knowledge is valuable to maintain an appropriate nutritional status [12] and to battle the condition of frailty itself.
The objective of this study is to examine the dietary patterns in a sample of non-institutionalized functionally independent older people living in the province of Gipuzkoa (Basque Country, Spain) and to explore potential associations between these patterns and frailty.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Design

This is a one-year follow-up cohort study; intending to explore, among others, the relationship between frailty status and adverse events at the end of the follow-up. The data reported here are exclusively based on the baseline assessment of the cohort.

2.2. Study Population

Non-institutionalized individuals aged 70 years or older, with a Barthel index score [13,14] higher than 90 points who agreed to participate are included in the study. Terminally ill subjects or those residing more than six months in a different area are excluded.

2.3. Data Collection

Individuals were first randomly selected from administrative databases of four primary care centers (PCC) of Gipuzkoa (i.e., Urnieta, Getaria, Zumaia and Zestoa). Those with a registered Barthel lower than 60 in their clinical health records, were excluded. All initially included individuals were invited to take part in the study. They were contacted first by letter and then by phone and their willingness to participate was recorded. Three trained nurses, one of whom also had a human nutrition university degree, oversaw the field work and performed the baseline assessment in the corresponding PCC. Given that the purpose of the current work was to study frail, not dependent individuals, only autonomous subjects (Barthel > 90 points) were considered.
All participants signed an informed consent. A blood sample was obtained from those who gave authorization to study biomarkers of frailty. The data collection was conducted between August 2016 and October 2017. The study received authorization from the Euskadi Ethics Committee (CEIC Euskadi 11/2015).

2.4. Variables

The following variables were obtained: sociodemographic characteristics, health status, anthropometric measurements and diet assessment.

2.5. Frailty and Health Status

Frailty was evaluated with the Timed Up and Go test (TUG). The TUG [15] measures the time that an adult needs to get up from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, come back to the chair and sit down. The person is considered to be frail if the time to perform the test is longer than 12 seconds. Self-perceived health was explored through a single item (“Overall, you would say that your health is…”) for which five response options were grouped in two categories: good (very good/good) and poor (fair/poor/very poor). Presence of depressive symptoms was considered if the score obtained in the Geriatric Depression Scale was 5 or more [16,17]. Polypharmacy was defined as the consumption of 4 or more prescription drugs per day [18]. Participants also reported sight and hearing difficulties and if they have had fractures or had fallen during the last 12 months.

2.6. Anthropometric Measures and Diet Assessment

Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight over height squared. The BMI was classified as: low normal weight (<23 kg/m2), normal weight (23–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2) and obese (≥30 kg/m2) [19]. The single underweight subject (BMI <18.5 kg/m2) was included in the low normal weight category. Waist-to-hip-ratio (WHR) was estimated by dividing waist circumference by hip circumference. Abdominal obesity was defined as WHR ≥ 0.90 for males and ≥0.85 for females [20]. Risk of malnutrition was studied with the Mini Nutritional Assessment scale (MNA) [21]. Participants were categorized as: normal nutrition (score 24–30), risk of malnutrition (score 17–23.5) and malnourished (score < 17). Frequency of food consumption was studied by using an extended version of a questionnaire included in the Basque Health survey [22]. Participants were asked how many times per week they ate: fresh fruit; natural juice; vegetables; legumes; pasta, rice and potatoes; bread and cereals; milk, cheese and yogurt; eggs; red meat; white meat; lean fish; fatty fish; cold cured meat; raw nuts; soft drinks; salty snacks; sweets; and fast food. Response options were: daily, ≥3 times/week, 1–2 times/week, <1 time/week, and never or almost never. For “daily” responses, the number of portions was recorded not only for fruit, juices and vegetables [22] but also for meat, fish, pasta-rice-potatoes, bread-cereals, legumes, milk-cheese-yogurt. Additionally, the number of meals, glasses of water and tablespoons of olive oil per day was registered. Different portion sizes were used (e.g., a handful for raw nuts, a tablespoon for olive oil, a unit for yogurt and eggs, one meat steak and one fish steak). The foods added by the current research group for creating the extended version of the consumption questionnaire were: raw nuts, olive oil, number of meals and glasses of water; the type of meat and fish, type of dairy products and type of bread-cereals consumed. The above information was also used to study if the participants complied with the food recommendations of the healthy eating pyramid of the Spanish Society of Community Nutrition (SENC) [23], based on the Mediterranean diet. The following SENC daily consumption recommendations have been considered: three or more servings or pieces of fruit; at least two servings of vegetables; at least two tablespoons of olive oil; 2–3 servings of milk and dairy products; three or more portions of cereals (bread is also included); four or more glasses of water; eating fish, white meat, eggs, nuts or legumes ≥ 1 time per day; and finally, red meat ≤ 1–2 times per week.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were described as frequencies and percentages (%), and continuous variables as mean with standard deviations (SD). A Chi-squared test and Student´s t-test or the non-parametric Wilcoxon test were used to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively.
A combination of multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) and cluster analysis were used to summarize the information recorded by several diet variables to obtain dietary patterns and then to differentiate groups of individuals with respect to those patterns. Both are multivariate techniques widely utilized in medical research [24,25]. First, an MCA was performed on all individuals to identify dietary patterns, including in the analysis the categorical variables related to diet, such as compliance with SENC recommendations and food intake. This approach allows to summarize the information of various categorical variables into a few dimensions, which explain the maximum amount of variability contained in the active variables included in the analysis [24]. The following active variables were introduced in the MCA in this case: frequency of natural juice, red and white meat, lean and fatty fish, pasta-rice-potatoes, eggs, legumes, cold cured meat, raw nuts, soft drinks, fast food, salty snacks and sweets. Compliance with the SENC food recommendations per variable (yes/no) was included for fresh fruit, vegetables, olive oil, milk-cheese-yogurt, bread-cereals and water, which are usually consumed on a daily basis. Categories for red and white meat, lean and fatty fish, soft drinks and fast food were grouped due to low frequency responses obtained (frequency < 10). This was done to avoid low frequency category values reaching high representativeness in the MCA results. Additionally, sex, TUG and MNA were considered as illustrative variables which were not included in the MCA analysis, but were added to the results to check their association with the active variables. MCA results can be graphically represented on a map, showing each category of the variables or each individual as a point, plotted in the dimensions constructed by the MCA. The closer the points the stronger the relationship between the categories/individuals. Second, a hierarchical cluster analysis was applied based on the dimensions provided by the MCA to organize all participants into groups of similar individuals regarding dietary patterns. The clusters obtained were displayed in the map constructed by the MCA dimensions. To describe and characterize the clusters, a comparison between groups was performed using several sociodemographic characteristics, health status, anthropometric and nutritional and diet variables, not only those included in the MCA analysis. Statistical analysis was carried out using the free statistical software R (version 3.4.0, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

3. Results

A total of 527 individuals were included in the study, 55% being women and with an overall mean age of 76.22 (SD 5.21) years (Table 1). Participants had a good perceived health (77.4%) even though the presence of polypharmacy was high (43.4%) as well as sight (75.8%) and hearing (40.2%) impairments. The prevalence of frailty, measured with the TUG, was 24.9%. Overweight and obesity were highly prevalent in the studied sample (45.5% and 31%, respectively). The proportion of individuals at risk of malnutrition was very low (3.3%). A high percentage of the sample complied with the recommendations related to olive oil, cereals, fish-white meat-eggs-nuts-legumes and red meat.
Relevant significant differences were observed among robust and frail individuals. Frail individuals were significantly older and had a lower educational level. They were also more likely to report poor health, depressive symptoms, polypharmacy and falls. Regarding nutritional status, frail participants showed more obesity and low normal weight, with higher values of waist and hip circumferences and were much more likely to present risk of malnutrition. When diet was assessed, certain significant differences were observed between these groups. Specifically, frail individuals consumed less raw nuts and drank more soft drinks (Figure 1). Differences were also observed in the compliance with the SENC food recommendations. Only vegetable consumption was statistically significant, lower in the frail group. Nonetheless, robust participants complied better in all remaining food recommendations, even though observed differences did not reach statistical significance.
The MCA results are shown in Figure 2. Two dimensions explained 21.7% and 8.0% of the variability in the data, respectively. The figure showed how the diet information is summarized in the two dimensions obtained with the MCA. The amount of food consumed is low on the left side and normal-high on the right side in the first dimension. The second dimension highlights the low frequency intake of certain foods (e.g., white and red meat, fatty fish or raw nuts) observed on the positive side of that dimension. The cluster analysis considering the two dimensions of the MCA identified three groups of individuals. Those pertaining to cluster 1 (n = 285) are located on the positive side of dimension 1. Cluster 2 (n = 194) and cluster 3 (n = 48) are situated on the negative side of dimension 1 and differentiated by dimension 2.
Table 2 and Figure 3 include a characterization of the three clusters and a comparison between them. Cluster 1 was constituted by patients with a mean age of 76.31 (SD 5.18) years and a frailty prevalence of 20.7%. Compared to the other two clusters, this group of individuals was more balanced by sex (48.8% were women), showed a lower frequency of depressive symptoms (10.7%), polypharmacy, sight problems and antecedents of falls (not statistically significant differences). They also ate less meals per day. Regarding the SENC indications, this group complied with cereals intake but less with fruit and red meat recommendations.
Individuals pertaining to cluster 2 were younger and 63.1% were women. The prevalence of frailty in this group was 28.1%, higher than cluster 1 but lower than cluster 3. These people were less likely to have hearing limitations (32.1%) compared to the other two clusters. This cluster was characterized by a high compliance for fruit and milk-dairy products, and moderate compliance of meat recommendations, while they also ate more meals per day.
The third cluster gathered the oldest individuals, with more women (66.7%) and the lowest educational level, while one of every three subjects of this group were living alone. It also had the highest prevalence of frailty (37.8%) and the worst health status, given that 25% of the respective individuals reported a poor self-perceived health. Simultaneously, cluster 3 individuals presented the highest prevalence of: depressive symptoms, polypharmacy, fractures and falls. Regarding nutritional status, this group had more obesity and low normal weight and the highest risk of malnutrition. Finally, this cluster showed the lowest level of compliance with the SENC recommendation for vegetables, cereal, milk-dairy products and fish-white meat-eggs-nuts-legumes intake, and the highest regarding red meat intake. Even though some of the above mentioned differences did not reach statistical significance on an individual level, as a whole, cluster 3 presented worse health and dietary patterns according to the SENC recommendations.

4. Discussion

Dietary patterns and their potential associations with frailty is examined in the present work. Although the studied sample presented certain health problems, reflected in polypharmacy, sight and hearing limitations, the majority perceived their health as being good. The prevalence of frailty observed in the data was similar to other studies included in the systematic review of Collard et al. [26]. A low proportion of the individuals had normal weight and were at risk of malnutrition. Moreover, a high compliance with the SENC food recommendations for olive oil, cereals, fish-white meat-eggs-nuts-legumes and read meat was observed. Similarly, in a Spanish study of older people [27], a high percentage of the sample complied with the Mediterranean Diet recommendations for cereals, olive oil and, fruit, milk and dairy products. Although, it is important to note that the recommendations used in that study were less demanding than those included in this work. The daily consumption of fruit, vegetables, pasta-rice-potatoes, bread and milk-cheese-yogurt was higher in this sample compared to the Basque Health Survey [22], lower for legumes and similar for eggs.
When comparing robust and frail individuals, several differences emerged. Frail individuals were older, had a lower educational level and a worse health status. These facts are already known and consistent with the literature [28,29]. They also showed more obesity and low normal weight and a worse compliance with the SENC recommendations. Previous evidence exists that diet is an important factor closely related to frailty [8] and these findings seem aligned with this association. Despite the fact that statistically significant differences were not seen in all food related variables, worse overall diet patterns corresponded to clusters with a higher prevalence of frailty. Additionally, it is relevant to mention the difficulty in comparing the current diet assessment results with other studies due to different applied methodologies [29,30,31].
Previous studies have explored dietary patterns in aged populations by using factor analysis [28,32], principal component analysis [33] or factor analysis combined with cluster methods [34]. Those studies featuring dietary patterns were assessed without a posterior differentiation of groups of individuals in relation to these patterns [28,33]. In another work, only the characteristics of the non-frail participants according to different dietary patterns [32] were presented. The combination of the two multivariate techniques that were applied in the current work constitutes a more comprehensive methodological approach.
Three groups of individuals emerged through the combined used of MCA and cluster analysis techniques. Beginning with cluster 1 through to cluster 3, a gradient of increasing frailty and worse health status (polypharmacy, depression and fractures) was observed, with the last cluster presenting the highest mean age and proportion of lower educated women, more frailty, poor self-perceived health and polypharmacy, among others.
Regarding nutritional assessment, cluster 3 also had the highest percentage of low normal weight and obese individuals and the highest risk of malnourishment. Interesting results were observed when exploring the dietary patterns of the three clusters. Cluster 1 had a low compliance with vegetable and fruit recommendations and the lowest with red meat indication. Conversely, this cluster had a medium compliance with dairy product recommendations and the highest with cereals, fish and white meat. The above reflects a pattern based on high meat and cereals intake, medium dairy products and low fruit and vegetables consumption. Regarding cluster 2, the most relevant characteristics of their dietary pattern is the high compliance with fruit, vegetables, olive oil, milk and dairy products, fish and meat, both white and red. This group presented an overall high adherence to the SENC recommendations. Finally, cluster 3 presented the lowest level of compliance with the SENC recommendations, except for red meat consumption.
Where dietary patterns are concerned, certain particularities of this study should be considered. The authors are aware that complex nutritional component assessment is the gold standard for describing dietary patterns and identifying nutritional deficits in the population of interest, but the authors are also aware that these kinds of tools have not been designed for clinical practice. The tools´ extension and administration time is an obstacle in their implementation in clinical setting, let alone during primary care consultations. Therefore, for the current work and considering its further transferability to primary care settings, the authors opted for a simple nutritional assessment tool. The Basque Health Survey questionnaire [22], which was subsequently expanded, allowed for the measurement of key diet components and more specific amounts. This approach far from being a limitation constitutes a strength of the current work. The tool, despite its constraints, managed to identify different dietary patterns in subjects of different frailty levels.
While this is a cross sectional study and no causal relationships can be established, an association seems to exist between a poor diet with bad health status and frailty. Individuals with a great disease load, bad health perception and a high risk of becoming dependent and institutionalized (cluster 3) also presented a very poor diet pattern that is known to increase the aforementioned risks. The causes of poor diet in aged and sick populations are well known and have been described—poor dentition, alteration of taste and smell, loss of appetite, swallowing disorders or functional difficulties, which complicate meal preparation [35,36]. However, the assessment of some of these problems, and the way the latter may affect dietary patterns, has not been systematically included in the care plans provided to elder populations in primary care settings.
Strengths of this study deserve to be highlighted. First, a big sample of functionally independent community dwelling individuals was studied. Another relevant aspect was exploring the data by applying MCA and cluster analysis. Thanks to the use of both techniques, it was possible to identify and characterize different groups of individuals according to their health status and dietary habits. Finally, the simple assessment tools used and the promising findings may serve as a basis for further investigative opportunities in primary care settings, and facilitate the implementation of future strategies.
Conversely, certain limitations also should be mentioned. Although the food consumption questionnaire included in the study was not as extensive compared to other works [28], some recall bias may have affected in the results. Previous studies also have described this situation [28,32,37]. Missing information observed in questions related to the frequency of food consumed was not substantial, in this sense. However, when the number of portions was asked of individuals consuming foods “daily”, the proportion of missing data increased, especially for olive oil, vegetables, fresh fruit and dairy products. It seemed that older people could not easily remember such information, or they found it difficult to quantify the amounts consumed.
The identification of different dietary patterns is a key element to characterize and tackle the health needs of aging populations. This is especially relevant in the case of frail patients. Further research and prospective studies are needed to better understand the impact of nutritional status and dietary patterns on the development of frailty. An appropriate dietary assessment adequate to be used in primary care settings is of major importance. It can help tackle problems stemming from inadequate dietary habits and promote healthy dietary patterns, such as the Mediterranean diet [10].

5. Conclusions

This study of functionally independent community dwelling older adults had three different groups of individuals derived according to food consumption. A gradient of increasing frailty, poorer health status and worse dietary pattern, regarding recommendations, was observed in the studied sample. The results obtained showed that even with the utilization of a simple tool to assess diet, differences between the dietary patterns of the three clusters were found. Therefore, it is necessary to raise awareness among primary health care professionals in relation to the importance of the implementation of nutrition screening tools, such as MNA, and a subsequent dietary assessment not only if risk of malnutrition or malnutrition is detected but also for further evaluation of frail patients´ dietary habits. Three key elements should be considered when deploying assessment procedures in primary care settings: adequate assessment tools, training for primary care teams and expert professionals for referrals.

Acknowledgments

This study has been supported by a grant from the Health Department of the Basque Country (Grant number: 2014111152). All authors want to thank Olatz Miranda, Irati Rodríguez, Bakarne Aguirre and the medical directors of Osakidetza for their help and support for the development of the field work. We also want to express our gratitude to all the participants for their generosity and willingness to participate.

Author Contributions

M.M., M.M.-A. and I.V. conceived and design the study. L.R., X.Z. and C.G. helped in the acquisition of the data. M.M.-A. analyzed the data. M.M., M.M.-A., K.V. and I.V. drafted the manuscript. All authors participated in the interpretation of the results, critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content and have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Clegg, A.; Young, J.; Iliffe, S.; Rikkert, M.O.; Rockwood, K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 2013, 381, 752–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rodríguez-Mañas, L.; Feart, C.; Mann, G.; Viña, J.; Chatterji, S.; Chodzko-Zajko, W.; Gonzalez-Colaco, H.M.; Bergman, H.; Carcaillon, L.; Nicholson, C.; et al. Searching for an operational definition of frailty: A Delphi method based consensus statement. The frailty operative definition-consensus conference project. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2012, 68, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fried, L.P.; Tangen, C.M.; Walston, J.; Newman, A.B.; Hirsch, C.; Gottdiener, J.; Seeman, T.; Tracy, R.; Kop, W.J.; Burke, G.; et al. Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2001, 56, M146–M157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Puts, M.T.E.; Toubasi, S.; Andrew, M.K.; Ashe, M.C.; Ploeg, J.; Atkinson, E.; Ayala, A.P.; Roy, A.; Rodriguez, M.M.; Bergman, H.; et al. Interventions to prevent or reduce the level of frailty in community-dwelling older adults: A scoping review of the literature and international policies. Age Ageing 2017, 46, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Daniels, R.; Metzelthin, S.; van Rossum, E.; de Witte, L.; van den Heuvel, W. Interventions to prevent disability in frail community-dwelling older persons: An overview. Eur. J. Ageing 2010, 7, 37–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Health Topics: Diet. Available online: http://www.who.int/topics/diet/en/ (accessed on 5 December 2017).
  7. Yannakoulia, M.; Ntanasi, E.; Anastasiou, C.A.; Scarmeas, N. Frailty and nutrition: From epidemiological and clinical evidence to potential mechanisms. Metabolism 2017, 68, 64–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bonnefoy, M.; Berrut, G.; Lesourd, B.; Ferry, M.; Gilbert, T.; Guerin, O.; Hanon, O.; Jeandel, C.; Paillaud, E.; Raynaud-Simon, A.; et al. Frailty and nutrition: Searching for evidence. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2015, 19, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lorenzo-López, L.; Maseda, A.; de Labra, C.; Regueiro-Folgueira, L.; Rodríguez-Villamil, J.L.; Millán-Calenti, J.C. Nutritional determinants of frailty in older adults: A systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2017, 17, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bach-Faig, A.; Berry, E.M.; Lairon, D.; Reguant, J.; Trichopoulou, A.; Dernini, S.; Medina, F.X.; Battino, M.; Belahsen, R.; Miranda, G.; et al. Mediterranean diet pyramid today. Science and cultural updates. Public Health Nutr. 2011, 14, 2274–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ahmed, T.; Haboubi, N. Assessment and management of nutrition in older people and its importance to health. Clin. Interv. Aging 2010, 5, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. White Book on Frailty. Available online: http://www.silvereco.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/White-book-on-Frailty-English-version.pdf (accessed on 22 March 2018).
  13. Mahoney, F.I.; Barthel, D.W. Functional Evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md. State Med. J. 1965, 14, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. González, N.; Bilbao, A.; Forjaz, M.J.; Ayala, A.; Orive, M.; Garcia-Gutierrez, S.; Hayas, C.L.; Quintana, J.M. Psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version of the Barthel Index. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Herman, T.; Giladi, N.; Hausdorff, J.M. Properties of the 'timed up and go' test: More than meets the eye. Gerontology 2011, 57, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sheikh, J.; Yesavage, J. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin. Gerontol. 1986, 5, 165–172. [Google Scholar]
  17. Martínez de la Iglesia, J.; Onís Vilches, M.C.; Dueñas, H.R.; Albert, C.C.; Aguado, T.C.; Luque, L.R. Versión española del cuestionario de Yesavage abreviado (GDS) para el despistaje de depresión en mayores de 65 años: Adaptación y validación. Medifam 2002, 12, 26–40. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fulton, M.M.; Allen, E.R. Polypharmacy in the elderly: A literature review. J. Am. Acad. Nurse Pract. 2005, 17, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Global Database on Body Mass Index: BMI Classification. Available online: http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?introPage=intro_3.html (accessed on 13 February 2018).
  20. World Health Organization. Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip Ratio: Report of a Who Expert Consultation; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mini Nutritional Assessment. Available online: http://www.mna-elderly.com/mna_forms.html (accessed on 5 December 2017).
  22. Encuesta de Salud del País Vasco. Available online: http://www.osakidetza.euskadi.eus/informacion/encuesta-de-salud-2013/r85-ckosag01/es/ (accessed on 18 December 2017). (In Spanish).
  23. Aranceta Bartrina, J.; Arija Val, V.; Maíz Aldalur, E.; Martínez de Victoria Muñoz, E.; Ortega Anta, R.M.; Pérez-Rodrigo, C.; Quiles Izquierdo, J.; Rodríguez Martín, A.; Román Viñas, B.; Salvador i Castell, G.; et al. Guías Alimentarias para la Población Española (Senc, Diciembre 2016); la Nueva Pirámide de la Alimentación Saludable. Nutr. Hosp. 2016, 33, 1–48. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Greenacre, M. Correspondence analysis in medical research. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 1992, 1, 97–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sourial, N.; Wolfson, C.; Bergman, H.; Zhu, B.; Karunananthan, S.; Quail, J.; Fletcher, J.; Weiss, D.; Bandeen-Roche, K.; Beland, F. A Correspondence analysis revealed frailty deficits aggregate and are multidimensional. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2010, 63, 647–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Collard, R.M.; Boter, H.; Schoevers, R.A.; Oude Voshaar, R.C. Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: A systematic review. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2012, 60, 1487–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hernández Galiot, A.; Goñi Cambrodón, I. Calidad de la dieta de la población española mayor de 80 años no institucionalizada. Nutr. Hosp. 2015, 31, 2571–2577. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Chan, R.; Leung, J.; Woo, J. Dietary patterns and risk of frailty in Chinese community-dwelling older people in Hong Kong: A prospective cohort study. Nutrients 2015, 7, 7070–7084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bollwein, J.; Diekmann, R.; Kaiser, M.J.; Bauer, J.M.; Uter, W.; Sieber, C.C.; Volkert, D. Dietary quality is related to frailty in community-dwelling older adults. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2013, 68, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kobayashi, S.; Asakura, K.; Suga, H.; Sasaki, S. High protein intake is associated with low prevalence of frailty among old Japanese women: A multicenter cross-sectional study. Nutr. J. 2013, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Smit, E.; Winters-Stone, K.M.; Loprinzi, P.D.; Tang, A.M.; Crespo, C.J. Lower nutritional status and higher food insufficiency in frail older US adults. Br. J. Nutr. 2013, 110, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. León-Muñoz, L.M.; García-Esquinas, E.; Lopez-Garcia, E.; Banegas, J.R.; Rodríguez-Artalejo, F. Major dietary patterns and risk of frailty in older adults: A prospective cohort study. BMC Med. 2015, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. De Haas, S.C.M.; de Jonge, E.A.L.; Voortman, T.; Graaff, J.S.; Franco, O.H.; Ikram, M.A.; Rivadeneira, F.; Kiefte-de Jong, J.C.; Schoufour, J.D. Dietary patterns and changes in frailty status: The Rotterdam study. Eur. J. Nutr. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sun, J.; Buys, N.J.; Hills, A.P. Dietary pattern and its association with the prevalence of obesity, hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors among Chinese older adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 3956–3971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pirlich, M.; Lochs, H. Nutrition in the elderly. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2001, 15, 869–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Inzitari, M.; Doets, E.; Bartali, B.; Benetou, V.; Di Bari, M.; Visser, M.; Volpato, S.; Gambassi, G.; Topinkova, E.; De Groot, L.; et al. Nutrition in the age-related disablement process. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2011, 15, 599–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. García-Esquinas, E.; Rahi, B.; Peres, K.; Colpo, M.; Dartigues, J.F.; Bandinelli, S.; Feart, C.; Rodríguez-Artalejo, F. Consumption of fruit and vegetables and risk of frailty: A dose-response analysis of 3 prospective cohorts of community-dwelling older adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 104, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Frequency of food intake in frail (F) and robust (R) individuals. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are labeled with a double asterisk. The numbers given on the right side of the graph correspond to missing values.
Figure 1. Frequency of food intake in frail (F) and robust (R) individuals. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are labeled with a double asterisk. The numbers given on the right side of the graph correspond to missing values.
Nutrients 10 00406 g001
Figure 2. Graphical display of the first two dimensions of the multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) (a) and cluster analysis of individuals (b). (a) has black dots in the plane representing the categories of the active diet variables included in the MCA, only the most representative ones were labeled. Blue dots show the relative position of illustrative variables (frailty status, Mini-Nutritional Assessment-MNA and sex). The closer the points are, the stronger the relationship between the categories. Abbreviations: f-fish, fatty fish; r-meat, red meat; cc-meat, cold cured meat; f-food, fast food; s-snacks, salty snacks; s-drinks, soft drinks; pw, per week; (b) has relative position of the individuals represented by different colors, depending on the subtype provided by the cluster analysis.
Figure 2. Graphical display of the first two dimensions of the multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) (a) and cluster analysis of individuals (b). (a) has black dots in the plane representing the categories of the active diet variables included in the MCA, only the most representative ones were labeled. Blue dots show the relative position of illustrative variables (frailty status, Mini-Nutritional Assessment-MNA and sex). The closer the points are, the stronger the relationship between the categories. Abbreviations: f-fish, fatty fish; r-meat, red meat; cc-meat, cold cured meat; f-food, fast food; s-snacks, salty snacks; s-drinks, soft drinks; pw, per week; (b) has relative position of the individuals represented by different colors, depending on the subtype provided by the cluster analysis.
Nutrients 10 00406 g002
Figure 3. Frequency of food intake in the three clusters of individuals identified. All p-values are statistically significant (p < 0.05) except for natural juice (p = 0.109), bread-cereals (p = 0.682) and milk-cheese-yogurt (p = 0.775). The number given on the right side of the graph corresponds to missing values.
Figure 3. Frequency of food intake in the three clusters of individuals identified. All p-values are statistically significant (p < 0.05) except for natural juice (p = 0.109), bread-cereals (p = 0.682) and milk-cheese-yogurt (p = 0.775). The number given on the right side of the graph corresponds to missing values.
Nutrients 10 00406 g003
Table 1. Characteristics of the sample according to frailty status, measured with Timed-Up-and-Go test.
Table 1. Characteristics of the sample according to frailty status, measured with Timed-Up-and-Go test.
VariablesTotal (n = 527)MissingFrail (n = 130)Robust (n = 392)p-Value
Age in years, mean (SD)76.22 (5.21)078.46 (5.52)75.43 (4.82)<0.001
Sex 0 0.262
  Men237 (45%) 53 (40.8%)184 (46.9%)
  Women290 (55%) 77 (59.2%)208 (53.1%)
Educational level 0 0.002
  Primary or lower415 (78.7%) 116 (89.2%)294 (75%)
  Secondary25 (4.7%) 2 (1.5%)23 (5.9%)
  Vocational training or university87 (16.5%) 12 (9.2%)75 (19.1%)
Living alone 121 (23%)025 (19.2%)93 (23.7%)0.347
Self-perceived health 1 0.005
  Good407 (77.4%) 88 (68.2%)316 (80.6%)
  Poor119 (22.6%) 41 (31.8%)76 (19.4%)
Geriatric Depression Scale 54 <0.001
  Depressive symptoms (≥5)66 (14%) 30 (27.8%)35 (9.6%)
  Not depressive symptoms (<5)407 (86%) 78 (72.2%)328 (90.4%)
Polypharmacy (≥4 drugs)226 (43.4%)677 (59.7%)146 (37.6%)<0.001
Sight impairments398 (75.8%)2102 (78.5%)291 (74.6%)0.444
Hearing limitations 211 (40.2%)260 (46.2%)148 (37.9%)0.121
Falls during the last year124 (23.8%)743 (33.1%)78 (20.3%)0.004
Fractures during the last year30 (5.8%)812 (9.3%)17 (4.4%)0.063
Height, mean (SD) (cm)161.11 (9.25)0159.08 (9.07)161.86 (9.23)0.003
Weight, mean (SD) (kg)73.35 (13.47)073.84 (14.41)73.2 (13.2)0.656
Body Mass Index 0 0.001
  Low normal weight (<23 kg/m2)50 (9.5%) 9 (6.9%)41 (10.5%)
  Normal weight (23–24.9 kg/m2)73 (13.9%) 17 (13.1%)56 (14.3%)
  Overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2)240 (45.5%) 46 (35.4%)191 (48.7%)
  Obesity (≥30 kg/m2)164 (48%) 58 (44.6%)104 (26.5%)
Waist circumference, mean (SD) (cm)95.04 (12.5)097.06 (13.06)94.31 (12.23)0.036
Hip circumference, mean (SD) (cm)104.04 (8.7)0105.57 (10.06)103.48 (8.14)0.033
Waist-to-hip-ratio 0 0.262
  Normal160 (30.4%) 34 (26.2%)125 (31.9%)
  High367 (69.6%) 96 (73.8%)267 (68.1%)
Mini Nutritional Assessment 17 <0.001
  Normal (24–30)493 (96.7%) 114 (90.5%)375 (98.7%)
  At risk of malnutrition (17–23.5)17 (3.3%) 12 (9.5%)5 (1.3%)
  Malnourished (<17)0 (0%) 0 (0%)0 (0%)
Daily consumption
  Number of meals, mean (SD)3.7 (0.73)83.7 (0.69)3.69 (0.73)0.954
  Number of glasses of water, mean (SD)3.75 (1.86)223.75 (1.72)3.74 (1.90)0.977
  Number of tablespoons of olive oil, mean (SD)2.6 (0.89)652.52 (0.84)2.62 (0.91)0.317
  Portions of fresh fruit, mean (SD) 2.84 (1.18)362.72 (1.06)2.89 (1.22)0.141
  Portions of vegetables, mean (SD) 1.22 (0.43)2371.1 (0.30)1.26 (0.46)0.001
  Portions of milk-cheese-yogurt, mean (SD) 2.35 (1.01)642.45 (1.07)2.32 (1.00)0.258
Meet daily recommendation
  Fresh fruit (≥3 portions)282 (53.5%)067 (51.5%)214 (54.6%)0.615
  Vegetable (≥2 portions)62 (11.9%)77 (5.5%)55 (14.2%)0.013
  Olive oil (≥2 tablespoon)420 (90.9%)6596 (89.7%)320 (91.2%)0.792
  Milk and dairy products recommendation (2–3 portions)309 (60%)1272 (56.7%)232 (60.6%)0.504
  Cereals recommendation (≥3 portions)387 (76.3%)2091 (71.7%)295 (78.5%)0.148
  Water recommendations (≥4 glasses)265 (52.5%)2265 (52.8%)197 (52.3%)0.992
  Fish-white meat-eggs-nuts-legumes (any ≥1 portions)465 (88.2%)0113 (86.9%)349 (89%)0.621
Meet weekly recommendation
  Red meat (≤1–2 portions)430 (87.7%)1101 (78.3%)324 (82.7%)0.329
Table 2. Characterization of the clusters of individuals and comparison between clusters.
Table 2. Characterization of the clusters of individuals and comparison between clusters.
VariablesCluster 1 (n = 285)Cluster 2 (n = 194)Cluster 3 (n = 48)p-Value
Age, mean (SD)76.31 (5.18)75.6 (4.84)78.19 (6.29)0.008
Sex 0.006
  Men146 (51.2%)75 (38.7%)16 (33.3%)
  Women139 (48.8%)119 (61.3%)32 (66.7%)
Educational level 0.098
  Primary or lower213 (74.7%)159 (82%)43 (89.6%)
  Secondary16 (5.6%)7 (3.6%)2 (4.2%)
  Vocational training or university56 (19.6%)28 (14.4%)3 (6.2%)
Living alone69 (24.2%)38 (19.6%)14 (29.2%)0.280
Timed up and go 0.021
  Frail (>12 s)59 (20.7%)54 (28.1%)17 (37.8%)
  Robust (≤12 s)226 (79.3%)138 (71.9%)28 (62.2%)
Self-perceived health 0.469
  Good216 (75.8%)155 (80.3%)36 (75%)
  Poor69 (24.2%)38 (19.7%)12 (25%)
Geriatric Depression Scale 0.001
  Depressive symptoms (≥5)29 (10.7%)24 (15%)13 (31.7%)
  Not depressive symptoms (<5)243 (89.3%)136 (85%)28 (68.3%)
Polypharmacy (≥4 drugs)115 (40.5%)84 (44.2%)27 (57.4%)0.091
Sight impairments213 (74.7%)143 (74.5%)42 (87.5%)0.139
Hearing limitations123 (43.3%)62 (32.1%)26 (54.2%)0.006
Falls during the last year66 (23.4%)40 (21.1%)18 (37.5%)0.056
Fractures during the last year11 (3.9%)11 (5.8%)8 (16.7%)0.002
Height, mean (SD) (cm)162.98 (9.46)159.05 (8.58)158.33 (8.24)<0.001
Weight, mean (SD) (kg)75.25 (14.27)71.33 (12.25)70.2 (11.59)0.002
Body Mass Index 0.998
  Low normal weight (<23 kg/m2)26 (9.1%)19 (9.8%)5 (10.4%)
  Normal weight (23–24.9 kg/m2)39 (13.7%)28 (14.4%)6 (12.5%)
  Overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2)130 (45.6%)89 (45.9%)21 (43.7%)
  Obesity (≥30 kg/m2)90 (31.6%)58 (29.9%)16 (33.3%)
Waist circumference, mean (SD) (cm)95.47 (12.53)95.07 (12.82)92.45 (10.77)0.302
Hip circumference, mean (SD) (cm)103.91 (8.48)104.23 (9.26)104 (7.68)0.925
Waist-to-hip-ratio 0.506
  Normal83 (29.1%)59 (30.4%)18 (37.5%)
  High202 (70.9%)135 (69.6%)30 (62.5%)
Mini Nutritional Assessment 0.327
  Normal (24–30)275 (97.5%)175 (96.2%)43 (93.5%)
  At risk of malnutrition (17–23.5)7 (2.5%)7 (3.8%)3 (6.5%)
  Malnourished (<17)000
Daily consumption
  Number of meals per day, mean (SD)3.58 (0.69)3.87 (0.75)3.7 (0.75)<0.001
  Number of glasses of water, mean (SD)3.61 (1.88)4.01 (1.74)3.54 (2.08)0.055
  Number of tablespoons of olive oil, mean (SD)2.51 (0.89)2.75 (0.90)2.55 (0.80)0.033
  Portions of fresh fruit, mean (SD)2.61 (1.19)3.14 (1.07)2.85 (1.28)<0.001
  Portions of vegetables, mean (SD)1.25 (0.45)1.21 (0.43)1.15 (0.37)0.558
  Portions of milk-cheese-yogurt, mean (SD)2.42 (1.12)2.23 (0.82)2.48 (1.04)0.124
Meet daily recommendation
  Fresh fruit recommendation (≥3 portions)116 (40.7%)138 (71.1%)28 (58.3%)<0.001
  Vegetable recommendation (≥2 portions)31 (11%)27 (14.1%)4 (8.5%)0.456
  Olive oil recommendation (≥2 tablespoon)238 (89.1%)147 (93.6%)35 (92.1%)0.289
  Milk and dairy product recommendation (2–3 portions)152 (54.5%)133 (70.4%)24 (51.1%)0.001
  Cereals recommendation (≥3 portions)244 (87.5%)117 (63.9%)26 (57.8%)<0.001
  Water recommendations (≥4 glasses)126 (45.7%)117 (63.9%)22 (47.8%)0.001
  Fish-white meat-eggs-nuts-legumes (any ≥1 portions)249 (87.4%)175 (90.2%)41 (85.4%)0.522
Meet weekly recommendation
  Red meat (≤1–2 portions)215 (75.4%)171 (88.1%)44 (93.6%)<0.001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Machón, M.; Mateo-Abad, M.; Vrotsou, K.; Zupiria, X.; Güell, C.; Rico, L.; Vergara, I. Dietary Patterns and Their Relationship with Frailty in Functionally Independent Older Adults. Nutrients 2018, 10, 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10040406

AMA Style

Machón M, Mateo-Abad M, Vrotsou K, Zupiria X, Güell C, Rico L, Vergara I. Dietary Patterns and Their Relationship with Frailty in Functionally Independent Older Adults. Nutrients. 2018; 10(4):406. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10040406

Chicago/Turabian Style

Machón, Mónica, Maider Mateo-Abad, Kalliopi Vrotsou, Xabier Zupiria, Carolina Güell, Leonor Rico, and Itziar Vergara. 2018. "Dietary Patterns and Their Relationship with Frailty in Functionally Independent Older Adults" Nutrients 10, no. 4: 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10040406

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop