Next Article in Journal
Ethical Challenges in Infant Feeding Research
Previous Article in Journal
A High Rate of Non-Compliance Confounds the Study of Whole Grains and Weight Maintenance in a Randomised Intervention Trial—The Case for Greater Use of Dietary Biomarkers in Nutrition Intervention Studies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 9
Issue 1
10.3390/nu9010058
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Correction to Nutrients 2015, 7(12), 10447-10468.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Jessri, M.; et al. Assessing the Nutritional Quality of Diets of Canadian Adults Using the 2014 Health Canada Surveillance Tool Tier System. Nutrients 2015, 7, 5543

by
Mahsa Jessri
1,
Stephanie K. Nishi
2,3 and
Mary R. L’Abbé
3,*
1
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 150 College St., Toronto, ON M5S 3E2, Canada
2
Clinical Nutrition & Risk Factor Modification Center, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON M5S 3E2, Canada
3
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 150 College St., Toronto, ON M5S 3E2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2017, 9(1), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9010058
Submission received: 12 December 2016 / Accepted: 12 December 2016 / Published: 12 January 2017
Browse Figure
Versions Notes
Due to a mistake in the publication process, “NS” symbols are missing from Figure 3 from this article [1]. The correct figure is shown below.
The change does not affect the scientific results. The manuscript will be updated and the original will remain online on the article webpage. We would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by this mistake.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Reference

  1. Jessri, M.; Nishi, S.K.; L’Abbé, M.R. Assessing the Nutritional Quality of Diets of Canadian Adults Using the 2014 Health Canada Surveillance Tool Tier System. Nutrients 2015, 7, 10447–10468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nutrients 09 00058 g003 550
Figure 3. Implementation of 2014 Health Canada Surveillance Tool Tier system to the dietary intakes of Canadian adults (≥19 years) in a weighted analysis to assess the number of servings from each of the ‘Eating Well with Canada’s Food Guide’ subgroups per 1000 kcal [25]. Dietary profiles of compliers (Quartile 1) *, intermediates (Quartiles 2 and 3) †, and non-compliers (Quartile 4) ‡ are compared §,‖ NS, Not significant; * The 25% of individuals with the lowest percentage of energy from Tier 4 and “other” foods and beverages; † The individuals in the interquartile range for energy intakes from Tier 4 and “other” foods and beverages; ‡ The 25% of individuals with the highest percentage of energy from Tier 4 and “other” foods and beverages; § Adjusted for age, sex, and misreporting status (under-reporters, plausible-, and over-reporters); ‖ Quartiles are based upon percentage of energy from all Tier 4 foods based on 2014 Health Canada’s Surveillance Tool Tier system plus “other” foods and beverages not recommended in the Eating Well with Canada’s Food Guide.
Figure 3. Implementation of 2014 Health Canada Surveillance Tool Tier system to the dietary intakes of Canadian adults (≥19 years) in a weighted analysis to assess the number of servings from each of the ‘Eating Well with Canada’s Food Guide’ subgroups per 1000 kcal [25]. Dietary profiles of compliers (Quartile 1) *, intermediates (Quartiles 2 and 3) †, and non-compliers (Quartile 4) ‡ are compared §,‖ NS, Not significant; * The 25% of individuals with the lowest percentage of energy from Tier 4 and “other” foods and beverages; † The individuals in the interquartile range for energy intakes from Tier 4 and “other” foods and beverages; ‡ The 25% of individuals with the highest percentage of energy from Tier 4 and “other” foods and beverages; § Adjusted for age, sex, and misreporting status (under-reporters, plausible-, and over-reporters); ‖ Quartiles are based upon percentage of energy from all Tier 4 foods based on 2014 Health Canada’s Surveillance Tool Tier system plus “other” foods and beverages not recommended in the Eating Well with Canada’s Food Guide.
Nutrients 09 00058 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jessri, M.; Nishi, S.K.; L’Abbé, M.R. Correction: Jessri, M.; et al. Assessing the Nutritional Quality of Diets of Canadian Adults Using the 2014 Health Canada Surveillance Tool Tier System. Nutrients 2015, 7, 5543. Nutrients 2017, 9, 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9010058

AMA Style

Jessri M, Nishi SK, L’Abbé MR. Correction: Jessri, M.; et al. Assessing the Nutritional Quality of Diets of Canadian Adults Using the 2014 Health Canada Surveillance Tool Tier System. Nutrients 2015, 7, 5543. Nutrients. 2017; 9(1):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9010058

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jessri, Mahsa, Stephanie K. Nishi, and Mary R. L’Abbé. 2017. "Correction: Jessri, M.; et al. Assessing the Nutritional Quality of Diets of Canadian Adults Using the 2014 Health Canada Surveillance Tool Tier System. Nutrients 2015, 7, 5543" Nutrients 9, no. 1: 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9010058

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop