Next Article in Journal
Early Diagnosis to Improve the Poor Prognosis of Pancreatic Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Aptamer Therapeutics in Cancer: Current and Future
Previous Article in Journal
Liver Transplantation for Alcoholic Liver Disease and Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Previous Article in Special Issue
EpCAM Immunotherapy versus Specific Targeted Delivery of Drugs
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 10
Issue 2
10.3390/cancers10020047
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Bioapplications of Cell-SELEX-Generated Aptamers in Cancer Diagnostics, Therapeutics, Theranostics and Biomarker Discovery: A Comprehensive Review

by
Xuehui Pang
1,2,
Cheng Cui
2,
Shuo Wan
2,
Ying Jiang
2,3,
Liangliang Zhang
3,
Lian Xia
4,
Long Li
2,
Xiaowei Li
2 and
Weihong Tan
2,5,*
1
Key Laboratory of Interfacial Reaction & Sensing Analysis in Universities of Shandong, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China
2
Center for Research at the Bio/Nano Interface, Department of Chemistry and Department of Physiology and Functional Genomics, UF Genetics Institute and McKnight Brain Institute, Shands Cancer Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-7200, USA
3
State Key Laboratory for the Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of Medicinal Resources, School of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China
4
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Qufu Normal University, Qufu 273165, China
5
Molecular Science and Biomedicine Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics, College of Biology, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2018, 10(2), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers10020047
Submission received: 17 December 2017 / Revised: 24 January 2018 / Accepted: 25 January 2018 / Published: 9 February 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aptamers: Promising Tools for Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Currently, functional single-stranded oligonucleotide probes, termed aptamers, generated by an iterative technology, Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment (SELEX), are utilized to selectively target molecules or cells with high affinity. Aptamers hold considerable promise as multifunctional molecules or conjugates for challenging nanotechnologies or bioapplications now and in the future. In this review, we first describe recent endeavors to select aptamers towards live cancer cells via cell-SELEX. We then introduce several characteristic applications of selected aptamers, especially in imaging, drug delivery and therapy. In part, these advances have been made possible via synthesis of aptamer-based nanomaterials, which, by their sizes, shapes, and physicochemical properties, allow such aptamer-nanomaterial complexes to function as signal reporters or drug carriers. We also describe how these aptamer-based molecular tools contribute to cancer biomarker discovery through high-affinity recognition of membrane protein receptors.

1. Elucidation

Aptamers, sometimes called “chemical antibodies”, are single-stranded DNA or RNA oligonucleotides commonly containing 20~100 nucleotides. However, aptamer molecules and antibodies are very different in terms of properties and structure [1,2,3,4,5]: (1) antibodies are produced in vivo in a living organism, while aptamers may be developed in vitro by selection and chemical synthesis, allowing easy, fast, and economical reproducibility in different batches; (2) aptamers can be easily conjugated with a series of functional groups or functionalized with different substrates [6] to achieve various diagnostic and therapeutic objectives, with additional advantages of reversible denaturation ability [7,8] and long-term stability in solution or as dry powder; (3) aptamers can bind with their targets with remarkable affinity (Kd ≈ µM to pM range) by the ability to fold into secondary or tertiary structures. Aptamers can specifically recognize their targets, including, but not limited to, metal ions, nanomaterials, molecules, chemical linkers, fluorophores, as well as proteins and intact cells [9,10], with selectivity comparable to that of antibodies; (4) aptamers are, moreover, nontoxic and exhibit rapid tissue penetration, with little immunogenicity compared to antibodies. These desirable features make aptamers ideal and valuable tools in many fields, such as molecular medicine, especially cancer diagnostics, therapeutics and theranostics.

2. Generation of Aptamers by Cell-SELEX

Aptamers are generated by a process called Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment (SELEX), first reported in 1990 [11,12]. A variety of targets, including metal ions, small organic molecules, viruses, parasites, tissues and bacterial cells [2,3,4,5], can be utilized for aptamer selection [13]. More importantly, intact cells, especially diseased cells, can act as targets in SELEX [14,15]. In addition, other SELEX methods, such as in vivo SELEX [16], tissue SELEX [17], and 3D cell-SELEX [18], have also been developed. Many techniques, such as surface plasmon resonance [19], robotic SELEX [20], capillary electrophoresis [21] and microfluidics [22] have been used for aptamer selection.
The cell-SELEX process (Figure 1) commonly begins with a large random library of about 1 × 1013~1 × 1016 ssDNA or ssRNA molecules. These molecules are repeatedly incubated with two types of cells, including specific cancer cell types, as the targets, and normal cells, or other types of cancer cells, as counter controls. These molecules undergo repeated interaction with the target of interest, progressively winnowing out non-binders, thus making it possible to obtain aptamer probes which specifically bind only to the targeted cancer cells, while molecules with nonspecific binding to the counter control cells are removed. These enriched molecules are amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The survivors are sequenced and used as molecular probes [23].
However, some obstacles complicate this process. In particular, aptamers are known to have poor nuclease resistance, although such degradation can be avoided by introducing nucleotide substitution on the 5′-α-P-site or on the 2′-carbon of ribose or by using artificial riboses in the modified library to enhance nuclease resistance [24]. Moreover, natural oligonucleotides have low information density, which can limit functionality and binding affinity. This drawback can be addressed by adding functional groups [25,26,27] or artificially expanded nucleobases [28,29,30] to mimic amino acid side chains in DNA/RNA.
Based on the advantages and technical advances noted above, unprecedented opportunities for biomarker discovery lie ahead for aptamers, in particular for cancer theranostics based on specific recognition. In fact, using cell-SELEX, a number of aptamers for cancer cells have already been selected [31], including breast cancer cells [32], lung cancer cells [33], and leukemia cells [15,34].

3. Aptamer-Based Applications

3.1. Imaging

The use of aptamers as in vivo imaging probes was introduced in 1997 [35] with a better signal-to-noise ratio compared with the corresponding antibody counterparts. Aptamers have no inherent imaging capacity, thus necessitating conjugation with functional groups or agents with imaging properties, such as fluorophores, iron oxide nanoparticles or other nanoparticles [36]. Fortunately, aptamers can be easily chemically modified, and researchers have developed a wide array of functionalized aptamers for in vivo molecular imaging.
Fluorophores can be modified on the end of an aptamer through phosphoramidite chemistry. The aptamers will then emit fluorescence for in vivo imaging when the needed photons are provided. The signal for a single aptamer is low, but it will increase when the aptamers circulate and accumulate after reaching the desired target. Further, multiple dyes can be labeled on a given aptamer via chemical reactions or interactions, such as biotin and streptavidin pairing [37], to further amplify fluorescence signaling, enabling easy and rapid identification of the target cells for diagnosis. Hu et al. [38] reported DNA nanoflowers (NFs) conjugated with a fluorescent resonance energy transfer aptamer by rolling circle replication reaction (RCA) to realize cellular imaging and cancer-targeted treatment (Figure 2). NFs covalently modified with three dye molecules generated multifluorescence emissions by a single-wavelength excitation.
Aptamers can be conjugated to paramagnetic molecules, such as super-paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) and paramagnetic metal chelates [39], to realize magnetic resonance-based molecular imaging. Li et al. reported the use of aptamer-conjugated Au-coated Fe3O4 nanoroses for selective and efficient imaging, diagnosis and therapy (Figure 3) [40]. Fe3O4 nanoroses served as a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) agent, which could probe variable relaxation rates of protons or certain other nuclei. The relaxation rates vary with nanoparticle interactions, such as aggregation, and can be distinguished by MRI with endogenous contrast.
To make aptamers effective for in vivo imaging, nanoparticles, or DNA-based nanostructures, can be combined with aptamers to gain greater signal, as well as deeper tissue penetration. Kuai et al. [41] developed circular bivalent aptamers with imaging capability to selectively target cancer cells. Zhao et al. designed a dual-activatable fluorescence/MRI bimodal platform based on a redox-active manganese dioxide (MnO2) nanosheet aptamer nanoprobe for targeting cancer cells (Figure 4) [42]. The enhancement in fluorescence signals facilitated in vivo imaging through the reduction of MnO2 by GSH and resulting generation of large amounts of Mn2+ ions.

3.2. Targeted Drug Delivery

Aptamers conjugated with delivery vector systems, such as liposome vesicles, have attracted attention for targeted intracellular drug delivery [43,44]. Most existing aptamers cannot directly migrate through the cell membrane, which calls for the development of new aptamer probes able to penetrate cells for drug delivery. Up to now, the aptamer with most frequent clinical use has targeted prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) [43,45,46]. The Tan group also developed aptamers Sgc8 and TDO5 which act as recognition molecules to bind CCRF-CEM and Ramos cells, respectively. In particular, aptamer Sgc8 is strongly internalized by CEM cells [15] and accumulates in the endosomes. Furthermore, Sgc8 exhibits low cytotoxicity to CEM cells, suggesting that these aptamers can be functionalized for cell type-specific intracellular delivery. Different modes, such as covalent crosslinking, intercalation and self-assembly, can be used to load the drug.
For instance, covalent crosslinking can be used for aptamer-based drug delivery owing to the facile functionalization of aptamers [47]. Niu et al. presented an approach based on the covalent binding of a cytotoxic N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC)-Au complex to a DNA aptamer. The experimental results showed clear evidence that the NHC-Au1-aptamer conjugate was efficient and selective for delivery of doxorubicin (Dox) into CCRF-CEM leukemia cells (Figure 5) [48]. Wang et al. designed aptamer-drug conjugates (ApDCs) for targeted drug delivery with reduced toxicity (Figure 6) [49]. They realized automated and modular synthesis of ApDCs and efficiently incorporated multiple drugs into ApDCs at predesigned positions by a solid-phase therapeutic module for targeted drug delivery. Zhu et al. [50] coupled photosensitizer, single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) and ssDNA aptamer to form a molecular beacon structure for controllable generation of singlet oxygen (1O2). The produced 1O2 could selectively kill SK-BR-3 breast cancer cells, not normal cells. This method should gain wide acceptance as an alternative noninvasive treatment for cancer.
In addition to covalent crosslinking, intercalation is another efficient drug-loading method for cancer therapy. Double-stranded sequences rich in CG or GC base pairs can intercalate the anticancer drug Dox. With these CG or GC sequences present in the aptamer sequence, internalization can be achieved with decreased cytotoxicity of Dox drug in nontarget cells. Wang et al. combined two functional DNA groups to form a G-quadruplex-aptamer-drug platform by intercalation. One group can recognize the target cells and another can act as a drug delivery carrier for TMPyP4 (Figure 7) [51], which binds and stabilizes the G-quadruplex. Zhu et al. developed aptamer-based DNA nanotrains by hybridization chain reaction (HCR) and utilized them to carry anticancer drugs for cancer therapy [52]. Two molecular beacon-structured DNA sequences self-assembled into tandem “boxcars” were used as carriers to transport the drugs into target cells with no indication of selective cytotoxicity.
Other researchers [53,54,55,56,57] have combined aptamer-based mesoporous nanomaterials as nanotools to effectively enhance drug-carrying capacity. The transported drug could be released by the reduced size of the single-stranded neck region. The strategy is applicable to the transport of anticancer drugs, such as paclitaxel, DOX and camptothecin, with highly efficient delivery.

3.3. Therapy

The aim of molecular medicine is evidence-based therapy, i.e., the adoption of a treatment based on cognition of molecular change. Targeted therapy can enhance the curative effect at the molecular level owing to lower cytotoxicity, fewer side effects and higher efficacy. Up to now, some targeting components, such as peptide-, protein- or immunoconjugates, have been recruited to improve the efficiency for targeted cancer therapy [44,58]. Moreover, the Tan group has significantly improved the design of targeted therapy regimens, including targeted phototherapy, gene therapy and chemotherapy, by taking advantage of cell-SELEX to produce cell-specific aptamers having multiple chemical properties against different cancers.

3.3.1. Phototherapy

Recently, photodynamic therapy (PDT), which makes use of a photosensitizer to generate reactive oxygen species under irradiation, has attracted attention in cancer therapy [59,60]. You et al. developed a DNA-based device capable of performing autonomous logic-based analysis of two or three cancer cell-surface markers for cancer therapy (Figure 8) [61]. Multicellular marker-based cancer analysis was based on modular AND, OR and NOT Boolean logic gates using the specific target-recognition properties of DNA aptamers with toehold-mediated strand displacement reactions. A general method was developed for assembling these modular logic gates to execute programmable and higher-order profiling of multiple coexisting cell-surface markers with the capacity to report a diagnostic signal and/or deliver targeted PDT. Wu et al. designed a multifunctional aptamer-based DNA nanoassembly (AptNA) for potential targeted cancer phototherapy (Figure 9) [62].
Many DNA-based building units with 5′-modification of acrydite groups were further photocrosslinked into an aptamer-based nanoassembly structure to realize selective recognition and transport with high programmability, and excellent biostability and biocompatibility. The Tan group also developed other strategies for photothermal therapy based on nanomaterial-aptamer conjugates [63,64].

3.3.2. Gene Therapy

Genetic therapy has been introduced into somatic tissues to treat many diseases, including cancer, using antisense oligonucleotides, plasmid DNA, or RNA interference [65,66,67,68,69]. DNA fragments can hybridize with these complementary sequences, e.g., the loop portion of a molecular beacon structure [70,71], which greatly facilitates the improvement of gene therapy or disease diagnosis. Li et al. reported size-controllable and stimuli-responsive DNA nanohydrogels, incorporating aptamers as effective targeted gene therapy vectors (Figure 10) [72]. DNA was used for gene therapy vectors constructed through a self-assembly process using three kinds of building units. Through this facile modular assembly, these aptamer-based DNA nanohydrogels hold great promise for targeted gene therapy with superior biocompatibility and efficient cellular uptake. Chen et al. designed a sensitive and selective approach based on molecular beacon micelle flares (MBMF) for mRNA detection and gene therapy (Figure 11) [73]. MBMF hybridization can lead to apoptosis of cancer cells by inducing gene silencing.

3.3.3. Chemotherapy

Enhancement of chemotherapy efficacy and comprehensive toxicity reduction can be achieved through conjugation of anticancer agents to targeting antibodies and aptamers [74,75]. Wang et al. [49] utilized solid-phase synthesis technology to generate DNA from individual phosphoramidite building blocks, namely, A, T, C and G, which can be used for automated and sequence-predesigned DNA synthesis. Using this technique, next-generation aptamer-drug conjugates were designed for targeted chemotherapy.
Chen et al. reported a smart multifunctional nanostructure (SMN) constructed from a porous hollow magnetite nanoparticle (PHMNP), a heterobifunctional PEG ligand and an aptamer to achieve targeted chemotherapy and magnetic resonance imaging of cancer cells in vitro (Figure 12) [76]. The PHMNPs were synthesized by a three-step reaction, including functionalization with PEG ligands and modification with DOX. Targeting aptamers were then introduced by reaction with the PEG ligands. Huang et al. [77] linked DNA aptamer Sgc8c to the anticancer agent Dox via covalent bonding. Compared with other reported ineffective Dox-conjugates, strategies based on the Sgc8c-Dox conjugate endowed targeted chemotherapy with enhanced feasibility, multiple potency and broad implications for targeted chemotherapy [74].

4. Biomarker Discovery for Cancers

According to the definition from the National Institutes of Health [78], a biomarker is “a characteristic that is objectively measured and elevated as an indicator of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes or pharmacologic response to a therapeutic intervention”. For cancer, the definition narrows to “a biological molecule found in blood, other body fluids, or tissues that is a sign of a normal or an abnormal process, or of a condition or a disease such as cancer” [79]. Thus, a biomarker can be applied to prognosis or diagnosis in a clinical setting. It can also be applied to either monitor disease progression or identify possible biochemical origins, achieving both by an immortalized cell line related to cancers, essentially because a biomarker molecule can differentiate “normal” from “abnormal” cells. Although some molecular markers have been established, such as nucleic acids, serum proteins, peptides, antibodies, tissues, biological fluids or small molecules (sugars, steroids or any other molecule present in cells) [80], biomarker discovery remains an urgent challenge in the field of molecular medicine [81,82], especially for cancers, because early diagnosis and effective therapy are greatly impeded by the lack of discriminatory biomarkers.
What mainly limits the current progress of biomarker discovery is under-representation of membrane proteins in proteome analysis. In addition, membrane proteins account for 30% of the proteins in the body, but fewer than 5% of membrane proteins can be recognized using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis combined with mass spectrometry (2D-GE-MS) [83]. However, differential selection of aptamers based on cell-SELEX promotes discovery of membrane protein biomarkers [81], as described in the following sections.
In exploratory work to establish cell-SELEX, the Tan group found the biomarker protein for target CEM cells by using highly specific aptamer Sgc8 [84]. A library of 1015 random DNA sequences was incubated with T-ALL cells (CCRF-CEM) using Ramos cells for counter selection. After selecting Sgc8 as a promising aptamer candidate, the target membrane protein was then identified. First, a target cell lysate was prepared, and the membrane protein fraction was separated from the total soluble proteins by a membrane protein extraction kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Then biotinylated Sgc8 aptamer and streptavidin magnetic beads were used to capture and isolate the membrane proteins having high affinity to aptamer. It was observed by flow cytometry that anti-protein tyrosine kinase 7 (PTK7) antibody and Sgc8 co-bind, rather than competitively bind, with the transmembrane protein PTK7 (Figure 13). Subsequently, the target membrane protein was separated using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and sequenced by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). After confirmatory experiments, PTK7, a transmembrane receptor commonly found on cancer cells, was finally identified and verified as the target biomarker [84]. These results indicated a relationship between T-ALL cancer cells and overexpression of PTK7. Aptamer Sgc8 is now used as a molecular recognition probe with various nanomaterials in a wide range of bioapplications, including tumor imaging [42,85,86], cancer therapy [48,62,87,88], targeted delivery [49,52,89,90], and cancer detection [61,91].
The same biomarker elucidation process was used with aptamer TDO5 to identify the immunoglobulin heavy mu chain (IGHM) as a biomarker for B-cell Burkitt’s lymphoma cell line [92]. In that selection case, UV-induced group 5-iododeoxyuridine (5-dUI) was covalently linked with biotinylated aptamer TDO5 by replacing several deoxythymidines (dTs). The overexpressed immunoglobulin heavy mu chain (IGHM) on premature B-lymphocytes was determined to be the target of TDO5 aptamer with close correlation to Burkitt’s lymphoma research [93,94]. The target Ramos cells were lysed, and aptamer-conjugated proteins were isolated by streptavidin beads, followed by cleavage of the disulfide bonds in the captured aptamer-protein complex to release the target. The results of LC-MS and SDS-PAGE also demonstrated the target protein to be B-cell receptor IGHM [94]. Utilizing this covalent linkage process, the capture, enrichment and aptamer-based isolation of target protein receptors have been improved (Figure 14) [95].
According to Benner, et al. [96], if “the Watson-Crick model supported an enlarged molecular system and an enlarged molecular biology,” then an artificially expanded genetic information system, such as that described by Zhang, et al. [95], should bring “enlarged functional potential,” with concomitant implications for biomarker discovery. More specifically, in their expanded system for SELEX biomarker discovery, Zhang, et al. utilized an artificial base pair to select aptamers against living cells [28,29] and cell-surface target proteins [96] (Figure 15). In this research, a pool of six-nucleotide aptamers was used to target cells with specific overexpression of glypican 3 protein (GPC3) on the cell surface, along with counterselection by laboratory in vitro evolution (LIVE). The selection-counterselection strategy starts with a known biomarker protein, which means the aptamer recognition biology is already well established. Implantation of these two artificial bases improved the functionality of the DNA library pool and tremendously enhanced information feedback from the conjugated complex. Also, based on negative selection, this new SELEX technology with expanded artificial bases virtually guarantees the removal of off-target binding DNAs.
Very recently, Wang et al. exploited the bioorthogonal interaction between protein and aptamer for biomarker discovery. They selectively conjugated DNA aptamers with a protein via a protein-aptamer template (PAT)-directed reaction because interactions between protein and aptamer are bioorthogonal (Figure 16) [97]. A modified aptamer library reservoir was used in the PAT-directed reactions, and an α,α-gem-difluoromethyl carboxyl group (F-carboxyl) was found to be suitable for selective and site-specific combination and functionalization. This approach of conjugating the aptamer to ascertain the interaction location, i.e., the protein, on the cell surface is promising for oriented modification of functional molecules and groups in biomedical and biological research.
A superior strategy called “parallel mode” was introduced by Shangguan and Wang et al. using a formaldehyde crosslinking concept [98]. Two aptamers, Sgc3b and Sgc4e, were successfully utilized to identify the corresponding biomarker protein selectin L and integrin α4 of Jurkat cells. A fluorophore was linked with the aptamer to track and optimize the binding by flow cytometry analysis. The authors adopted a quantitative proteomic method by labeling a stable isotope on amino acids when culturing Jurkat cells, and they utilized crosslinked, aptamer-based affinity purification by a streptavidin agarose resin. Finally, the target proteins were identified via SDS-PAGE and LC-MS/MS after heating for 1 h at 95 °C. They recommended this method for elucidation of general protein targets.
In another example, Yang et al. reported an adhesion molecule biomarker, epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), on the surfaces of epithelial cells (circulating tumor cells (CTCs)) [99]. In the SELEX process, recombinant EpCAM was labeled by His-Tag, and this complex served as target. Random DNA aptamers were delivered to target EpCAM protein and EpCAM-expressing cell lines. Subsequently, aptamer SYL3C was verified and is now broadly applied for cell-related research [87,100,101].
Recently, Yarden et al. developed a 14-nt aptamer to target a biomarker for native human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein [102]. HER2 protein is a member of the rbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases overexpressed in many tumors that can be targeted to develop anticancer drugs. The results showed that the selected aptamer-based trimer could be effectively delivered to inhibit the growth of tumor cells and that the efficacy was better by almost two-fold compared to delivery by anti-HER2 mAb. The mechanism indicated that the conjugation of aptamer with HER2 receptor could induce cellular internalization, cytoplasmic translocation, and lysosomal degradation to suppress tumor growth.
Many other researchers have also devoted themselves to SELEX and biomarker discovery-related studies. Mayer et al. exploited a click-chemistry approach to functionalize the oligonucleotide library for further versatility [103]. Bertozzi et al. induced a proximity-increased bioorthogonal ligation strategy for crosslinkage between azidosugar-labeled glycoproteins and an aptamer conjugated with cyclooctyne [104]. Vinkenborg et al. developed a strategy for aptamer-based affinity labeling of protein using three aptamers with different structures and a phenylazide as photocrosslinker [105]. Kimoto et al. reported a method to enhance affinity for biomarker discovery by adding a fifth nucleotide with a hydrophilic functional group to the aptamer library [30].
The aforementioned works indicate that the cell-SELEX technique and its numerous iterations and variations will only accelerate the development of biomarker discovery. They also implicate that the selected aptamers have potential for alternative theranostic applications by specific recognition of target biomarkers. All these efforts continuously improve the progress in biomarker discovery by focusing on cell-surface proteins, and they will, as a result, significantly contribute to the broad development of personalized medicine.

5. Conclusions and Perspectives

SELEX technologies and aptamers have been studied for more than a quarter century since first reported, and applications have been developed to meet the needs of molecular-level personalized medicine. Many kinds of aptamers have been successfully selected and continuously applied in multiple biotechnical fields and clinical practice, such as imaging, drug delivery, therapies and biomarker discovery. However, some difficulties still remain, despite the great progress in aptamer and aptamer-based cancer biomarker discovery, and applications are still in an early stage. Moreover, the applications in commercial areas are limited, although aptamers are widely studied in many fields. First, for cell-SELEX, the aptamer selection process usually takes more than 30 days, while the results still display some degree of randomness, which blocks the improvement of aptamer-based biomarker discovery in some aspects. Successful aptamer selection will be evaluated by the elimination of phenotypic heterogeneity from different cell passages and shortened turn-around time, with ideally just one round needed to precisely select effective aptamers. Second, it is time-consuming to identify aptamers specific for different cancer-related samples, which are necessary for the discovery of more cancer biomarkers. Third, binding affinity enhancement between aptamers and their targets is still urgently needed to avoid off-target recognition and to improve protein extraction efficiency from complex samples (e.g., the cross-linking methods). The fourth concern is the natural self-disadvantages of DNA/RNA molecules as binding moieties. Very limited folding patterns can be produced, because, with only A-T and C-G building blocks, the possible information density is low. Moreover, the interactions by which the present bases establish DNA/RNA molecules include only hydrogen bonding between nucleobases, aromatic ring stacking among nucleobases and electrostatic interactions. Another current major obstacle for aptamer applications is the need for enhancement and optimization of therapeutic efficacy, stability and half-life within a patient, especially in complex microenvironments surrounding disease tissue. To solve this, “locked DNAs” may be one way to improve the stability. In addition, the Tan group has successfully synthesized artificial DNA bases to endow aptamers with additional innovative properties to provide even more innovative ways to discover new effective biomarkers, efficient therapeutic pathways, or approaches for cellular uptake. Continued research will lead to improved understanding of cancer at the molecular level. This improvement will further inspire exciting new technologies for imaging, drug delivery, cancer therapy and cancer biomarker discovery, leading to feasible and realizable personalized treatment methods.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by grants awarded from the National Institutes of Health (NIH: GM079359), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21521063,21575050), NSF (No. 1645215), Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province, China (No. 2015GGH301001), Technology Research Project of Shandong Provincial Education Department (No. J15LC07), and National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Project of China (No. 21627809).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Jiang, Y.; Zhu, C.; Ling, L.; Wan, L.; Fang, X.; Bai, C. Specific aptamer-protein interaction studied by atomic force microscopy. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 2112–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Famulok, M.; Hartig, J.S.; Mayer, G. Functional aptamers and aptazymes in biotechnology, diagnostics, and therapy. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 3715–3743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bunka, D.H.; Stockley, P.G. Aptamers come of age-at last. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 4, 588–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Navani, N.K.; Li, Y. Nucleic acid aptamers and enzymes as sensors. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2006, 10, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Osborne, S.E.; Matsumura, I.; Ellington, A.D. Aptamers as therapeutic and diagnostic reagents: Problems and prospects. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1997, 1, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lee, J.H.; Yigit, M.V.; Mazumdar, D.; Lu, Y. Molecular diagnostic and drug delivery agents based on aptamer-nanomaterial conjugates. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2010, 62, 592–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Shamah, S.M.; Healy, J.M.; Cload, S.T. Complex target SELEX. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Shi, H.; Cui, W.; He, X.; Guo, Q.; Wang, K.; Ye, X.; Tang, J. Whole cell-SELEX aptamers for highly specific fluorescence molecular imaging of carcinomas in vivo. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e70476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Shangguan, D.; Meng, L.; Cao, Z.C.; Xiao, Z.; Fang, X.; Li, Y.; Cardona, D.; Witek, R.P.; Liu, C.; Tan, W. Identification of liver cancer-specific aptamers using whole live cells. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 721–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ko, H.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Kang, H.; Ryu, S.H.; Song, I.C.; Lee, D.S.; Kim, S. A nucleolin-targeted multimodal nanoparticle imaging probe for tracking cancer cells using an aptamer. J. Nucl. Med. 2010, 51, 98–105. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ellington, A.D.; Szostak, J.W. In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands. Nature 1990, 346, 818–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tuerk, C.; Gold, L. Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: RNA ligands to bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. Science 1990, 249, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hermann, T.; Patel, D.J. Adaptive recognition by nucleic acid aptamers. Science 2000, 287, 820–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sefah, K.; Shangguan, D.; Xiong, X.; O’donoghue, M.B.; Tan, W. Development of DNA aptamers using Cell-SELEX. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Shangguan, D.; Li, Y.; Tang, Z.; Cao, Z.C.; Chen, H.W.; Mallikaratchy, P.; Sefah, K.; Yang, C.J.; Tan, W. Aptamers evolved from live cells as effective molecular probes for cancer study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 11838–11843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cheng, C.; Chen, Y.H.; Lennox, K.A.; Behlke, M.A.; Davidson, B.L. In vivo SELEX for identification of brain-penetrating aptamers. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2013, 2, e67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Li, S.; Xu, H.; Ding, H.; Huang, Y.; Cao, X.; Yang, G.; Li, J.; Xie, Z.; Meng, Y.; Li, X. Identification of an aptamer targeting hnRNP A1 by tissue slide-based SELEX. J. Pathol. 2009, 218, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Souza, A.G.; Marangoni, K.; Fujimura, P.T.; Alves, P.T.; Silva, M.J.; Bastos, V.A.F.; Goulart, L.R.; Goulart, V.A. 3D Cell-SELEX: Development of RNA aptamers as molecular probes for PC-3 tumor cell line. Exp. Cell Res. 2016, 341, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ngubane, N.A.; Gresh, L.; Pym, A.; Rubin, E.J.; Khati, M. Selection of RNA aptamers against the M. tuberculosis EsxG protein using surface plasmon resonance-based SELEX. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 449, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Glökler, J.; Schütze, T.; Konthur, Z. Automation in the high-throughput selection of random combinatorial libraries—Different approaches for select applications. Molecules 2010, 15, 2478–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Mosing, R.K.; Bowser, M.T. Isolating aptamers using capillary electrophoresis–SELEX (CE–SELEX). Nucleic Acid Pept. Aptamers. Methods Protoc. 2009, 535, 33–43. [Google Scholar]
  22. Xu, Y.; Yang, X.; Wang, E. Aptamers in microfluidic chips. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 683, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mackie, E.J.; Chiquet-Ehrismann, R.; Pearson, C.A.; Inaguma, Y.; Taya, K.; Kawarada, Y.; Sakakura, T. Tenascin is a stromal marker for epithelial malignancy in the mammary gland. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 4621–4625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tolle, F.; Mayer, G. Dressed for success—Applying chemistry to modulate aptamer functionality. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kim, Y.; Cao, Z.; Tan, W. Molecular assembly for high-performance bivalent nucleic acid inhibitor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 5664–5669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hasegawa, H.; Taira, K.-I.; Sode, K.; Ikebukuro, K. Improvement of aptamer affinity by dimerization. Sensors 2008, 8, 1090–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Müller, J.; Wulffen, B.; Pötzsch, B.; Mayer, G. Multidomain targeting generates a high-affinity thrombin-inhibiting bivalent aptamer. ChemBioChem 2007, 8, 2223–2226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhang, L.; Yang, Z.; Sefah, K.; Bradley, K.M.; Hoshika, S.; Kim, M.-J.; Kim, H.-J.; Zhu, G.; Jiménez, E.; Cansiz, S. Evolution of functional six-nucleotide DNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6734–6737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Sefah, K.; Yang, Z.; Bradley, K.M.; Hoshika, S.; Jiménez, E.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, G.; Shanker, S.; Yu, F.; Turek, D. In vitro selection with artificial expanded genetic information systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 1449–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kimoto, M.; Yamashige, R.; Matsunaga, K.-I.; Yokoyama, S.; Hirao, I. Generation of high-affinity DNA aptamers using an expanded genetic alphabet. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 453–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gedi, V.; Kim, Y.-P. Detection and characterization of cancer cells and pathogenic bacteria using aptamer-based nano-conjugates. Sensors 2014, 14, 18302–18327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kang, H.S.; Huh, Y.M.; Kim, S.; Lee, D.-K. Isolation of RNA aptamers targeting HER-2-overexpressing breast cancer cells using cell-SELEX. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2009, 30, 1827–1831. [Google Scholar]
  33. Chen, H.W.; Medley, C.D.; Sefah, K.; Shangguan, D.; Tang, Z.; Meng, L.; Smith, J.E.; Tan, W. Molecular recognition of small-cell lung cancer cells using aptamers. ChemMedChem 2008, 3, 991–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sefah, K.; Tang, Z.; Shangguan, D.; Chen, H.; Lopez-Colon, D.; Li, Y.; Parekh, P.; Martin, J.; Meng, L.; Tan, W. Molecular recognition of acute myeloid leukemia using aptamers. Leukemia 2009, 23, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Charlton, J.; Sennello, J.; Smith, D. In vivo imaging of inflammation using an aptamer inhibitor of human neutrophil elastase. Chem. Biol. 1997, 4, 809–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Babendure, J.R.; Adams, S.R.; Tsien, R.Y. Aptamers switch on fluorescence of triphenylmethane dyes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14716–14717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Li, N.; Ebright, J.N.; Stovall, G.M.; Chen, X.; Nguyen, H.H.; Singh, A.; Syrett, A.; Ellington, A.D. Technical and biological issues relevant to cell typing with aptamers. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 2438–2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hu, R.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Z.; Zhu, G.; Chen, T.; Fu, T.; Tan, W. DNA nanoflowers for multiplexed cellular imaging and traceable targeted drug delivery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 126, 5821–5826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wang, A.Z.; Bagalkot, V.; Vasilliou, C.C.; Gu, F.; Alexis, F.; Zhang, L.; Shaikh, M.; Yuet, K.; Cima, M.J.; Langer, R. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle—Aptamer bioconjugates for combined prostate cancer imaging and therapy. ChemMedChem 2008, 3, 1311–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Li, C.; Chen, T.; Ocsoy, I.; Zhu, G.; Yasun, E.; You, M.; Wu, C.; Zheng, J.; Song, E.; Huang, C.Z. Gold-coated Fe3O4 nanoroses with five unique functions for cancer cell targeting, imaging, and therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 1772–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kuai, H.; Zhao, Z.; Mo, L.; Liu, H.; Hu, X.; Fu, T.; Zhang, X.; Tan, W. Circular bivalent aptamers enable in vivo stability and recognition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 9128–9131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhao, Z.; Fan, H.; Zhou, G.; Bai, H.; Liang, H.; Wang, R.; Zhang, X.; Tan, W. Activatable fluorescence/MRI bimodal platform for tumor cell imaging via MnO2 nanosheet—Aptamer nanoprobe. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 11220–11223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Farokhzad, O.C.; Jon, S.; Khademhosseini, A.; Tran, T.-N.T.; LaVan, D.A.; Langer, R. Nanoparticle-aptamer bioconjugates. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 7668–7672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chaloin, L.; Lehmann, M.J.; Sczakiel, G.; Restle, T. Endogenous expression of a high-affinity pseudoknot RNA aptamer suppresses replication of HIV-1. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 4001–4008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gu, F.; Zhang, L.; Teply, B.A.; Mann, N.; Wang, A.; Radovic-Moreno, A.F.; Langer, R.; Farokhzad, O.C. Precise engineering of targeted nanoparticles by using self-assembled biointegrated block copolymers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 2586–2591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chu, T.C.; Twu, K.Y.; Ellington, A.D.; Levy, M. Aptamer mediated siRNA delivery. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, e73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kim, E.; Yang, J.; Park, J.; Kim, S.; Kim, N.H.; Yook, J.I.; Suh, J.-S.; Haam, S.; Huh, Y.-M. Consecutive targetable smart nanoprobe for molecular recognition of cytoplasmic microRNA in metastatic breast cancer. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 8525–8535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Niu, W.; Chen, X.; Tan, W.; Veige, A.S. N-heterocyclic carbene-gold (I) complexes conjugated to a leukemia-specific DNA aptamer for targeted drug delivery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 8889–8893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wang, R.; Zhu, G.; Mei, L.; Xie, Y.; Ma, H.; Ye, M.; Qing, F.-L.; Tan, W. Automated modular synthesis of aptamer-drug conjugates for targeted drug delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 2731–2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Zhu, Z.; Tang, Z.; Phillips, J.A.; Yang, R.; Wang, H.; Tan, W. Regulation of singlet oxygen generation using single-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 10856–10857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Wang, K.; You, M.; Chen, Y.; Han, D.; Zhu, Z.; Huang, J.; Williams, K.; Yang, C.J.; Tan, W. Self-assembly of a biofunctional DNA carrier for drug delivery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 6098–6101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zhu, G.; Zheng, J.; Song, E.; Donovan, M.; Zhang, K.; Liu, C.; Tan, W. Self-assembled, aptamer-tethered DNA nanotrains for targeted transport of molecular drugs in cancer theranostics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 7998–8003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zheng, J.; Zhu, G.; Li, Y.; Li, C.; You, M.; Chen, T.; Song, E.; Yang, R.; Tan, W. A spherical nucleic acid platform based on self-assembled DNA biopolymer for high-performance cancer therapy. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 6545–6554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, J.; Zhu, G.; You, M.; Song, E.; Shukoor, M.I.; Zhang, K.; Altman, M.B.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Huang, C.Z. Assembly of aptamer switch probes and photosensitizer on gold nanorods for targeted photothermal and photodynamic cancer therapy. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 5070–5077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Özalp, V.C.; Schäfer, T. Aptamer-Based Switchable Nanovalves for Stimuli-Responsive Drug Delivery. Chem. Asian J. 2011, 17, 9893–9896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Qiao, G.; Zhuo, L.; Gao, Y.; Yu, L.; Li, N.; Tang, B. A tumor mRNA-dependent gold nanoparticle—Molecular beacon carrier for controlled drug release and intracellular imaging. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 7458–7460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Fan, P.; Suri, A.K.; Fiala, R.; Live, D.; Patel, D.J. Molecular recognition in the FMN-RNA aptamer complex. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 258, 480–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Morishita, R.; Gibbons, G.H.; Horiuchi, M.; Ellison, K.E.; Nakama, M.; Zhang, L.; Kaneda, Y.; Ogihara, T.; Dzau, V.J. A gene therapy strategy using a transcription factor decoy of the E2F binding site inhibits smooth muscle proliferation in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 5855–5859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Oseroff, A.R.; Ohuoha, D.; Hasan, T.; Bommer, J.C.; Yarmush, M.L. Antibody-targeted photolysis: Selective photodestruction of human T-cell leukemia cells using monoclonal antibody-chlorin e6 conjugates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 8744–8748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Dolmans, D.E.; Fukumura, D.; Jain, R.K. Photodynamic therapy for cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. You, M.; Zhu, G.; Chen, T.; Donovan, M.J.; Tan, W. DNA “Nano-Claw”: Logic-Based Autonomous Cancer Targeting and Therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1256–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wu, C.; Han, D.; Chen, T.; Peng, L.; Zhu, G.; You, M.; Qiu, L.; Sefah, K.; Zhang, X.; Tan, W. Building a multifunctional aptamer-based DNA nanoassembly for targeted cancer therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 18644–18650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Mallikaratchy, P.; Tang, Z.; Tan, W. Cell specific aptamer-photosensitizer conjugates as a molecular tool in photodynamic therapy. ChemMedChem 2008, 3, 425–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Huang, Y.-F.; Sefah, K.; Bamrungsap, S.; Chang, H.-T.; Tan, W. Selective photothermal therapy for mixed cancer cells using aptamer-conjugated nanorods. Langmuir 2008, 24, 11860–11865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Hao, L.; Patel, P.C.; Alhasan, A.H.; Giljohann, D.A.; Mirkin, C.A. Nucleic acid-gold nanoparticle conjugates as mimics of microRNA. Small 2011, 7, 3158–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Seferos, D.S.; Giljohann, D.A.; Hill, H.D.; Prigodich, A.E.; Mirkin, C.A. Nano-flares: Probes for transfection and mRNA detection in living cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15477–15479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Giljohann, D.A.; Seferos, D.S.; Prigodich, A.E.; Patel, P.C.; Mirkin, C.A. Gene regulation with polyvalent siRNA−nanoparticle conjugates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 2072–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Horton, H.M.; Anderson, D.; Hernandez, P.; Barnhart, K.M.; Norman, J.A.; Parker, S.E. A gene therapy for cancer using intramuscular injection of plasmid DNA encoding interferon α. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 1553–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Paddison, P.J.; Caudy, A.A.; Bernstein, E.; Hannon, G.J.; Conklin, D.S. Short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) induce sequence-specific silencing in mammalian cells. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 948–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Okamoto, A.; Tanabe, K.; Inasaki, T.; Saito, I. Phototriggered drug release from functionalized oligonucleotides by a molecular beacon strategy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 115, 2606–2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, J.; Zhang, P.; Mao, H.; Leong, K. Enhanced gene expression in mouse muscle by sustained release of plasmid DNA using PPE-EA as a carrier. Gene Ther. 2002, 9, 1254–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Li, J.; Zheng, C.; Cansiz, S.; Wu, C.; Xu, J.; Cui, C.; Liu, Y.; Hou, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L. Self-assembly of DNA nanohydrogels with controllable size and stimuli-responsive property for targeted gene regulation therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1412–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Chen, T.; Wu, C.S.; Jimenez, E.; Zhu, Z.; Dajac, J.G.; You, M.X.; Han, D.; Zhang, X.B.; Tan, W.H. DNA micelle flares for intracellular mRNA imaging and gene therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 2012–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Farokhzad, O.C.; Cheng, J.; Teply, B.A.; Sherifi, I.; Jon, S.; Kantoff, P.W.; Richie, J.P.; Langer, R. Targeted nanoparticle-aptamer bioconjugates for cancer chemotherapy in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 6315–6320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Chu, T.C.; Marks, J.W.; Lavery, L.A.; Faulkner, S.; Rosenblum, M.G.; Ellington, A.D.; Levy, M. Aptamer: Toxin conjugates that specifically target prostate tumor cells. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 5989–5992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Chen, T.; Shukoor, M.I.; Wang, R.; Zhao, Z.; Yuan, Q.; Bamrungsap, S.; Xiong, X.; Tan, W. Smart multifunctional nanostructure for targeted cancer chemotherapy and magnetic resonance imaging. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 7866–7873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Huang, Y.F.; Shangguan, D.; Liu, H.; Phillips, J.A.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.; Tan, W. Molecular assembly of an aptamer-drug conjugate for targeted drug delivery to tumor cells. ChemBioChem 2009, 10, 862–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Strimbu, K.; Tavel, J.A. What are biomarkers? Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 2010, 5, 463–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Henry, N.L.; Hayes, D.F. Cancer biomarkers. Mol. Oncol. 2012, 6, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Frangogiannis, N.G. Biomarkers: Hopes and challenges in the path from discovery to clinical practice. Transl. Res. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 2012, 159, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Berezovski, M.V.; Lechmann, M.; Musheev, M.U.; Mak, T.W.; Krylov, S.N. Aptamer-facilitated biomarker discovery (AptaBiD). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9137–9143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Negm, R.S.; Verma, M.; Srivastava, S. The promise of biomarkers in cancer screening and detection. Trends Mol. Med. 2002, 8, 288–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wu, C.C.; Yates, J.R. The application of mass spectrometry to membrane proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 262–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Shangguan, D.; Cao, Z.; Meng, L.; Mallikaratchy, P.; Sefah, K.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Tan, W. Cell-specific aptamer probes for membrane protein elucidation in cancer cells. J.Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 2133–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Shi, H.; He, X.; Wang, K.; Wu, X.; Ye, X.; Guo, Q.; Tan, W.; Qing, Z.; Yang, X.; Zhou, B. Activatable aptamer probe for contrast-enhanced in vivo cancer imaging based on cell membrane protein-triggered conformation alteration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 3900–3905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Wang, L.; Jacobson, O.; Avdic, D.; Rotstein, B.H.; Weiss, I.D.; Collier, L.; Chen, X.; Vasdev, N.; Liang, S.H. Ortho-stabilized 18F-azido click agents and their application in PET imaging with single-stranded DNA aptamers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 12777–12781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Pu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Lu, Y.; Yuan, P.; Liu, J.; Yu, B.; Wang, G.; Yang, C.J.; Liu, H.; Tan, W. Using DNA aptamer probe for immunostaining of cancer frozen tissues. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 1919–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Xiong, X.; Liu, H.; Zhao, Z.; Altman, M.B.; Lopez-Colon, D.; Yang, C.J.; Chang, L.J.; Liu, C.; Tan, W. DNA aptamer-mediated cell targeting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 1472–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Douglas, S.M.; Bachelet, I.; Church, G.M. A logic-gated nanorobot for targeted transport of molecular payloads. Science 2012, 335, 831–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Zhu, G.; Hu, R.; Zhao, Z.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, X.; Tan, W. Noncanonical self-assembly of multifunctional DNA nanoflowers for biomedical applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 16438–16445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. You, M.; Peng, L.; Shao, N.; Zhang, L.; Qiu, L.; Cui, C.; Tan, W. DNA “nano-claw”: Logic-based autonomous cancer targeting and therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1256–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Mallikaratchy, P.; Tang, Z.; Kwame, S.; Meng, L.; Shangguan, D.; Tan, W. Aptamer directly evolved from live cells recognizes membrane bound immunoglobin heavy mu chain in Burkitt’s lymphoma cells. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2007, 6, 2230–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Thomas, M.D.; Srivastava, B.; Allman, D. Regulation of peripheral B cell maturation. Cell. Immunol. 2006, 239, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Fang, X.; Tan, W. Aptamers generated from cell-SELEX for molecular medicine: A chemical biology approach. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 43, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Zhang, L.; Wan, S.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Fu, T.; Liu, Q.; Cao, Z.; Qiu, L.; Tan, W. Molecular elucidation of disease biomarkers at the interface of chemistry and biology. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 2532–2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Zhang, L.; Yang, Z.; Le Trinh, T.; Teng, I.; Wang, S.; Bradley, K.M.; Hoshika, S.; Wu, Q.; Cansiz, S.; Rowold, D.J. Aptamers against cells overexpressing Glypican3 from expanded genetic systems combined with cell engineering and laboratory evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 12372–12375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Wang, R.; Lu, D.; Bai, H.; Jin, C.; Yan, G.; Ye, M.; Qiu, L.; Chang, R.; Cui, C.; Liang, H. Using modified aptamers for site specific protein-aptamer conjugations. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 2157–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Bing, T.; Shangguan, D.; Wang, Y. Facile discovery of cell-surface protein targets of cancer cell aptamers. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2015, 14, 2692–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Song, Y.; Zhu, Z.; An, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, H.; Liu, D.; Yu, C.; Duan, W.; Yang, C.J. Selection of DNA aptamers against epithelial cell adhesion molecule for cancer cell imaging and circulating tumor cell capture. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 4141–4149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Subramanian, N.; Sreemanthula, J.B.; Balaji, B.; Kanwar, J.R.; Biswas, J.; Krishnakumar, S. A strain-promoted alkyne—Azide cycloaddition (SPAAC) reaction of a novel EpCAM aptamer—Fluorescent conjugate for imaging of cancer cells. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 11810–11813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Liu, Z.; Lu, Y.; Pu, Y.; Liu, J.; Liu, B.; Yu, B.; Chen, K.; Fu, T.; Yang, C.J.; Liu, H. Using aptamers to elucidate esophageal cancer clinical samples. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 18516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Mahlknecht, G.; Maron, R.; Mancini, M.; Schechter, B.; Sela, M.; Yarden, Y. Aptamer to ErbB-2/HER2 enhances degradation of the target and inhibits tumorigenic growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 8170–8175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Tolle, F.; Brändle, G.M.; Matzner, D.; Mayer, G. A Versatile approach towards nucleobase-modified aptamers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 10971–10974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Robinson, P.V.; de Almeida-Escobedo, G.; de Groot, A.E.; McKechnie, J.L.; Bertozzi, C.R. Live-cell labeling of specific protein glycoforms by proximity-enhanced bioorthogonal ligation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 10452–10455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Vinkenborg, J.L.; Mayer, G.; Famulok, M. Aptamer-based affinity labeling of proteins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 9176–9180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cancers 10 00047 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematics of cell-based aptamer selection.
Figure 1. Schematics of cell-based aptamer selection.
Cancers 10 00047 g001
Cancers 10 00047 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of aptamer-conjugated DNA nanoflowers (NFs) by rolling circle replication reaction (RCA) to realize cellular imaging with fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET) for tracking DOX drug. Reprinted with permission from © (2014) WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA [38].
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of aptamer-conjugated DNA nanoflowers (NFs) by rolling circle replication reaction (RCA) to realize cellular imaging with fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET) for tracking DOX drug. Reprinted with permission from © (2014) WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA [38].
Cancers 10 00047 g002
Cancers 10 00047 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of Fe3O4@Au nanoroses for cancer cell targeting, MRI, and optical imaging, as well as photothermal and chemotherapy. Reprinted with permission from © (2014) WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA [40].
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of Fe3O4@Au nanoroses for cancer cell targeting, MRI, and optical imaging, as well as photothermal and chemotherapy. Reprinted with permission from © (2014) WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA [40].
Cancers 10 00047 g003
Cancers 10 00047 g004 550
Figure 4. Activation mechanism of the MnO2 nanosheet-aptamer nanoprobe for fluorescence/MRI bimodal tumor cell imaging. Reprinted with permission from © (2014) American Chemical Society [42].
Figure 4. Activation mechanism of the MnO2 nanosheet-aptamer nanoprobe for fluorescence/MRI bimodal tumor cell imaging. Reprinted with permission from © (2014) American Chemical Society [42].
Cancers 10 00047 g004
Cancers 10 00047 g005 550
Figure 5. Schematic illustration of aptamer-NHC-Au1 conjugate. Reprinted with permission from © (2016) WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA [48].
Figure 5. Schematic illustration of aptamer-NHC-Au1 conjugate. Reprinted with permission from © (2016) WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA [48].
Cancers 10 00047 g005
Cancers 10 00047 g006 550
Figure 6. Schematic illustration of automated and modular chemical synthesis of aptamer-drug conjugates (ApDCs) from phosphoramidites A, T, C, G and D. Reprinted with permission from © (2014) American Chemical Society [49].
Figure 6. Schematic illustration of automated and modular chemical synthesis of aptamer-drug conjugates (ApDCs) from phosphoramidites A, T, C, G and D. Reprinted with permission from © (2014) American Chemical Society [49].
Cancers 10 00047 g006
Cancers 10 00047 g007 550
Figure 7. Schematic illustration of a G-quadruplex-aptamer. TMPyP4 is delivered with the G-quadruplex as the drug carrier and the aptamer as the targeting molecule. The helical strand is the aptamer. Reprinted with permission from © (2011) WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA [51].
Figure 7. Schematic illustration of a G-quadruplex-aptamer. TMPyP4 is delivered with the G-quadruplex as the drug carrier and the aptamer as the targeting molecule. The helical strand is the aptamer. Reprinted with permission from © (2011) WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA [51].
Cancers 10 00047 g007
Cancers 10 00047 g008 550
Figure 8. Schematic illustration of modular logic gates assembly for targeted photodynamic therapy. (a) Two-input trivalent “Y”-shaped Nano-Claw and (b) Three-input tetravalent “X”-shaped Nano-Claw. (c,d) Flow cytometry experiments to determine the best cDNA sequences with high Cy5.5 fluorescence signal (from biotin-labeled TC01, Sgc4f or Sgc8c aptamer) and low FITC fluorescence signal (labeled on the candidate strands). Reprinted with permission from © (2014) American Chemical Society [61].
Figure 8. Schematic illustration of modular logic gates assembly for targeted photodynamic therapy. (a) Two-input trivalent “Y”-shaped Nano-Claw and (b) Three-input tetravalent “X”-shaped Nano-Claw. (c,d) Flow cytometry experiments to determine the best cDNA sequences with high Cy5.5 fluorescence signal (from biotin-labeled TC01, Sgc4f or Sgc8c aptamer) and low FITC fluorescence signal (labeled on the candidate strands). Reprinted with permission from © (2014) American Chemical Society [61].
Cancers 10 00047 g008
Cancers 10 00047 g009 550
Figure 9. Schematic illustration of multifunctional self-assembled building units and photocrosslinked nanoassembly structure for targeted cancer phototherapy. Multifunctional DNA sequences, including aptamers, acrydite-modified single-stranded DNA, and antisense oligonucleotides are self-assembled to form Y-shaped functional domains, which further link via X-shaped connectors to form building units through the complementary arm sequences. Reprinted with permission from © (2013) American Chemical Society [62].
Figure 9. Schematic illustration of multifunctional self-assembled building units and photocrosslinked nanoassembly structure for targeted cancer phototherapy. Multifunctional DNA sequences, including aptamers, acrydite-modified single-stranded DNA, and antisense oligonucleotides are self-assembled to form Y-shaped functional domains, which further link via X-shaped connectors to form building units through the complementary arm sequences. Reprinted with permission from © (2013) American Chemical Society [62].
Cancers 10 00047 g009
Cancers 10 00047 g010 550
Figure 10. Schematic illustration of DNA nanohydrogels incorporating aptamers for effective targeted gene therapy. Reprinted with permission from © (2015) American Chemical Society [72].
Figure 10. Schematic illustration of DNA nanohydrogels incorporating aptamers for effective targeted gene therapy. Reprinted with permission from © (2015) American Chemical Society [72].
Cancers 10 00047 g010
Cancers 10 00047 g011 550
Figure 11. Schematic illustration of molecular beacon micelle flares (MBMFs) for gene therapy. Diacyl-lipid-molecular-beacon conjugates (L-MBs) self-assemble into MBMFs and enter living cells. Before binding their target mRNA, the fluorophore and the quencher of the MBMFs are in close proximity (OFF state). Hybridization between the loop region and the target mRNA separates the fluorophore and the quencher, producing a fluorescence signal (ON state) and a DNA/RNA heteroduplex for RNase H action. Reprinted with permission from © (2013) WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA [73].
Figure 11. Schematic illustration of molecular beacon micelle flares (MBMFs) for gene therapy. Diacyl-lipid-molecular-beacon conjugates (L-MBs) self-assemble into MBMFs and enter living cells. Before binding their target mRNA, the fluorophore and the quencher of the MBMFs are in close proximity (OFF state). Hybridization between the loop region and the target mRNA separates the fluorophore and the quencher, producing a fluorescence signal (ON state) and a DNA/RNA heteroduplex for RNase H action. Reprinted with permission from © (2013) WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA [73].
Cancers 10 00047 g011
Cancers 10 00047 g012 550
Figure 12. Schematic illustration of SMNs for targeted cancer chemotherapy. Owing to surface coating of aptamers, DOX-SMNs specifically enter target cancer cells through receptor-mediated endocytosis and reside in acidic lysosomes. Reprinted with permission from Reference [76]. © (2011) American Chemical Society.
Figure 12. Schematic illustration of SMNs for targeted cancer chemotherapy. Owing to surface coating of aptamers, DOX-SMNs specifically enter target cancer cells through receptor-mediated endocytosis and reside in acidic lysosomes. Reprinted with permission from Reference [76]. © (2011) American Chemical Society.
Cancers 10 00047 g012
Cancers 10 00047 g013 550
Figure 13. Flow cytometry analysis of CEM cells targeted with anti-PTK7-PE or sgc8-FITC. Reprinted with permission from © (2009) American Chemical Society [94].
Figure 13. Flow cytometry analysis of CEM cells targeted with anti-PTK7-PE or sgc8-FITC. Reprinted with permission from © (2009) American Chemical Society [94].
Cancers 10 00047 g013
Cancers 10 00047 g014 550
Figure 14. Aptamer-based isolation of target protein biomarkers with crosslinking aptamers and target proteins for cancer cell surface biomarker discovery. (A) Cell-SELEX technology selects a panel of aptamers capable of distinguishing molecular differences between two types of cells. (B) Aptamer-assisted affinity purification without cross-linking aptamers and target proteins as targets proteomics strategy for cancer cell surface biomarker discovery. (C) Aptamer-assisted affinity purification with cross-linking aptamers and target proteins as targeted proteomics strategy for cancer cell surface biomarker discovery. Reprinted with permission from © (2017) American Chemical Society [95].
Figure 14. Aptamer-based isolation of target protein biomarkers with crosslinking aptamers and target proteins for cancer cell surface biomarker discovery. (A) Cell-SELEX technology selects a panel of aptamers capable of distinguishing molecular differences between two types of cells. (B) Aptamer-assisted affinity purification without cross-linking aptamers and target proteins as targets proteomics strategy for cancer cell surface biomarker discovery. (C) Aptamer-assisted affinity purification with cross-linking aptamers and target proteins as targeted proteomics strategy for cancer cell surface biomarker discovery. Reprinted with permission from © (2017) American Chemical Society [95].
Cancers 10 00047 g014
Cancers 10 00047 g015 550
Figure 15. Schematic illustration of hybridization of the six nucleotides for an artificially expanded genetic information system (AEGIS) in Laboratory In Vitro Evolution (LIVE). (a) Molecular structures and space-filling models of C:G, T:A, and Z:P pairs showing their similarity; (b) Application of the artificial aptamers in biomarker discovery based on the AEGIS-LIVE selection procedure. Reprinted with permission from © (2016) WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA [96].
Figure 15. Schematic illustration of hybridization of the six nucleotides for an artificially expanded genetic information system (AEGIS) in Laboratory In Vitro Evolution (LIVE). (a) Molecular structures and space-filling models of C:G, T:A, and Z:P pairs showing their similarity; (b) Application of the artificial aptamers in biomarker discovery based on the AEGIS-LIVE selection procedure. Reprinted with permission from © (2016) WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA [96].
Cancers 10 00047 g015
Cancers 10 00047 g016 550
Figure 16. Schematic illustration of (a) one-step bioorthogonal reaction for biomarker discovery; (b) PAT-directed reactions for the preparation of protein-aptamer conjugates (PAC, route I) or protein-oligonucleotide conjugates (POC, route II). Reprinted with permission from © (2016) Royal Society of Chemistry [97].
Figure 16. Schematic illustration of (a) one-step bioorthogonal reaction for biomarker discovery; (b) PAT-directed reactions for the preparation of protein-aptamer conjugates (PAC, route I) or protein-oligonucleotide conjugates (POC, route II). Reprinted with permission from © (2016) Royal Society of Chemistry [97].
Cancers 10 00047 g016

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pang, X.; Cui, C.; Wan, S.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Xia, L.; Li, L.; Li, X.; Tan, W. Bioapplications of Cell-SELEX-Generated Aptamers in Cancer Diagnostics, Therapeutics, Theranostics and Biomarker Discovery: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers 2018, 10, 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers10020047

AMA Style

Pang X, Cui C, Wan S, Jiang Y, Zhang L, Xia L, Li L, Li X, Tan W. Bioapplications of Cell-SELEX-Generated Aptamers in Cancer Diagnostics, Therapeutics, Theranostics and Biomarker Discovery: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers. 2018; 10(2):47. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers10020047

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pang, Xuehui, Cheng Cui, Shuo Wan, Ying Jiang, Liangliang Zhang, Lian Xia, Long Li, Xiaowei Li, and Weihong Tan. 2018. "Bioapplications of Cell-SELEX-Generated Aptamers in Cancer Diagnostics, Therapeutics, Theranostics and Biomarker Discovery: A Comprehensive Review" Cancers 10, no. 2: 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers10020047

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop