Next Article in Journal
Galloping Reduction of Transmission Lines by Using Phononic Crystal
Next Article in Special Issue
Identification and Crystallographic Analysis of a New Carbohydrate Acetylesterase (SmAcE1) from Sinorhizobium meliloti
Previous Article in Journal
Dopant Concentration Induced Optical Changes in Ca,Eu-α-Sialon
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Use of Size Exclusion Chromatography to Monitor Protein Self-Assembly
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Expression, Purification, Crystallization, and X-ray Structural Analysis of CRISPR-Associated Protein Cas6 from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii

1
Department of Nephrology, Da Chien General Hospital, Miaoli 36052, Taiwan
2
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Kuang Tien General Hospital, Taichung 43303, Taiwan
3
School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
4
Chinese Medicine Research and Development Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
5
Department of Biotechnology, Hungkuang University, Taichung 43302, Taiwan
6
Department of Safety, Health and Environmental Engineering, Hungkuang University, Taichung 43302, Taiwan
7
Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Crystals 2017, 7(11), 344; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst7110344
Submission received: 20 September 2017 / Revised: 7 November 2017 / Accepted: 8 November 2017 / Published: 10 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Protein Crystallography)

Abstract

:
The CRISPR-associated protein 6, Cas6 protein, is an endoribonuclease that cleaves precursor CRISPR RNAs within the repeat sequence to release specific invader-targeting RNAs. Cas6 protein can recognize different sequences by their specific scaffold. To investigate its binding mode, we purified and crystallized a His-tagged Cas6 protein from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii (MjCas6) using the sitting-drop vapor-diffusion method. The crystals diffracted to a resolution of 1.85 Å and belonged to monoclinic space group C2, with unit-cell parameters a = 200.84 Å, b = 85.26 Å, c = 100.06 Å, β = 118.47°. The crystals of MjCas6 contain four molecules in the asymmetric unit. The protein fold is similar to the other Cas6 homologues, such as Pyrococcus furiosus Cas6, suggesting functional similarity. Moreover, in the C2 crystal the MjCas6 monomers formed a tandem array, which we hypothesize to possibly correlate with repetitive RNA precursors.

1. Introduction

Bacteria and archaea have developed defense and regulatory mechanisms to cope with various adventitious attacks, including viral infections. A novel adaptive defense system in bacteria and archaea has been discovered, which is of great interest to biologists. The CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)-Cas (CRISPR-associated proteins) system contains a multistep process to defend against viruses [1,2,3,4,5]. There are two major steps. First, the specific small fragments of foreign nucleic acids (virus or plasmid) are recognized as being non-self (exogenous) and are incorporated into the host genome between short DNA repeats such as CRISPRs [1,2]. Second, after the small foreign fragments are transcribed and precisely processed into small RNAs, they constitute a multifunctional protein complex with Cas proteins to recognize and cleave the incoming foreign genetic material. This adaptive immune system uses a library of small noncoding RNAs as a potent weapon against fast-evolving viruses [6].
The CRISPR-Cas loci in prokaryotic and archeal genomes comprise an array of direct, typically palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and unique spacers located between the CRSIPR repeats [7]. The CRISPR arrays are usually associated with cas genes. These genes encode proteins with a variety of predicted nucleic acid-manipulating activities such as nucleases, helicases, and polymerases [7]. The primary products of the CRISPR loci, pre-crRNA, consist of the invader-targeting sequence and flanking repeat fragments, which are processed enzymatically into ~60-nt mature crRNAs [8]. In association with Cas proteins, crRNAs target foreign genetic elements for destruction by interacting with the phage or plasmid nucleic acid in a sequence-specific manner [8].
CRISPR-Cas systems could be classified to two classes and six different types (I–ѴІ) [9]. Class 1 systems evolved with multi-subunit effector complexes, in contrast to the single-protein effector modules in Class 2 [9]. The wide variety of CRISPR-Cas systems (Types I–VI with 19 subtypes) carry out these processes by using distinct mechanisms, Cas proteins, and crRNA species [5,10,11]. In Type I and III systems, a Cas6 protein family with endonuclease activity generates the functional crRNAs by site-specific cleavage of repeat sequences in the precursor transcripts (pre-crRNA transcripts). By RNA analysis, it was found that CRISPR locus transcripts are cleaved within the repeat sequences to release ~60- to 70-nt RNA intermediates [12]. Subsequently, these ~60- to 70-nt RNA fragments are cleaved into smaller ~35- to 45-nt mature crRNAs.
Previous structural studies have shown that Cas6 proteins share a common ferredoxin or RNA recognition motif fold [13,14]. Those Cas6 proteins have divergent amino acid sequences, which are responsible for the ability to recognize different kinds of RNA substrates. To investigate the relationship of Cas6 protein from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii (MjCas6) with its specific RNA substrate, we expressed a His-tagged MjCas6 protein, which was then purified and crystalized to determine the three-dimensional structure by X-ray diffraction. The MjCas6 structure can be a starting point to study the evolutionary relationship between Cas6 proteins and their specific substrate recognition capabilities, as well as how the protein scaffold evolves with the substrate binding modes.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Purification and Characterizaction of MjCas6

The MjCas6 protein was constructed with a His6-tag at its C-terminus to facilitate purification. The recombinant MjCas6 protein was overexpressed in Escherichia coli in a soluble form, then purified and crystallized for structure studies. About 20 mg purified protein per liter of E. coli culture was produced. The purity of protein was investigated using SDS-PAGE analysis. The result showed that high-purity MjCas6 protein was obtained and suitable for crystallization (Figure 1a). The elution profile of MjCas6 on a Superdex-200 size-exclusion column exhibited a large single peak at 86.5 mL elution volume (Figure 1b). The molecular weight of MjCas6 was about ~31.2 kDa as estimated by molecular weight standard on the gel filtration chromatogram.

2.2. Crystallization of the MjCas6 Protein

The purified MjCas6 protein with a His6-tag at its C-terminus was tested in various crystallization conditions, but most of them were not suitable for growing crystals or produced crystals that were not proper for X-ray data collection due to the poor diffraction quality. A reservoir solution consisting of 100 mM HEPES sodium salt pH 7.5, 800 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate, and 800 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate (Kit: JCSG++2) was eventually found and optimized to produce MjCas6 crystals with good diffraction quality. The best crystals were obtained using a reservoir containing 100 mM HEPES sodium salt pH 7.5, 600 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate, and 600 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate. The crystals employed in the X-ray diffraction experiments grew to maximum dimensions of approximately 0.4 × 0.3 × 0.1 mm3 within four weeks (Figure 2).

2.3. X-ray Analysis of the MjCas6 Crystal

Although some diffraction patterns with smeared spots were observed in the best crystals, the diffraction data collection turned to be feasible. The diffraction data were then collected to 1.85 Å resolution where the signal-to-noise ratio was about 2 (Figure 3). The native crystals belonged to space group C2, with unit-cell parameters a = 200.84 Å, b = 85.26 Å, c = 100.06 Å, and β = 118.47°. The presence of four molecules in the asymmetric unit was assumed by calculating the Mathews coefficient (VM) as 3.02 Å3∙Da−1. The corresponding solvent content was 59.31% [15]. Some data collection statistics are shown in Table 1. The local symmetry connecting the protein molecules in the asymmetric unit was investigated using MOLREP [16] from the CCP4 package. It is compatible with the presence of four monomers in an asymmetric unit of the crystal.
The initial model of MjCas6 protein was obtained by the molecular-replacement method using the program Phaser [17]. The coordinate of a Cas6 monomer from Pyrococcus furiosus (PfCas6, PDB code: 3I4H) was used as the search model. All four molecules in the asymmetric were successfully located. Refinement of the model structure employed COOT [18,19] and PHENIX [20], which yielded R and Rfree of 0.167 and 0.194. Local non-crystallographic symmetry (NCS) restraints were used and the resulting RMSD between the MjCas6 monomers ranged from 0.080 to 0.212 Å for 194–216 pairs of Cα atoms.

2.4. Functional Implications of the MjCas6 Structure

The ferredoxin-like fold consists of two sets of β-α-β super-secondary structure motifs that are arranged into a four-stranded, antiparallel β-sheet covered on one side by two α-helices. This fold is the most abundant protein domain known and is observed in a superfamily of RNA Recognition Motif (RMM) proteins consisting of several mRNA splicing factors [21]. Unlike RRM, however, MjCas6 comprises a tandem ferredoxin-like fold with two antiparallel β sheets on one side, which are packed against five α-helices on the other side (Figure 4). On the “back” side, a dense, positively charged groove is formed along the junction of the two β sheets. On the “front” side, the catalytic residue His47 is found near the end of helix α2. When compared with the PfCas6 structures (PDB 3I4H, 3PKM, and 3UFC) [22,23,24], the RMSD is in the range of 1.33–1.78 Å for 167–198 Cα pairs. The largest deviations are found in helices α1/α2 and strands β10/β11.
Judging by its structural similarity to PfCas6, MjCas6 is likely to interact with the RNA substrate via the same positively charged binding surface and conserved catalytic residues such as Tyr32, His47, and Lys53. These are close to the G-rich loop that contains the Cas6 signature motif [25]. Presumably MjCas6, like PfCas6, does not require divalent metals for activity but cleaves RNA by the 2′,3′-cyclic phosphate pathway. Because the protein was crystallized from a solution that contained significant amounts of phosphate and glycerol, both ligands were found on the protein surface. Twenty-six phosphate ions were identified in various positively charged pockets, as well as the monomer-monomer contact regions. Glycerol molecules were not observed as clearly, and only four were included in the model.
Interestingly, MjCas6 forms an array with alternating orientations in the asymmetric unit (Figure 5). Specifically, the last and outermost strand β8 in the N-terminal β sheet of one monomer is associated with its counterpart of a second monomer. Backbone hydrogen bonds are formed between the two β strands across the NCS dyad. On the other hand, the protruding β10–β11 hairpin is also associated with the counterpart of a third monomer. When the PfCas6-bound RNA from PDB 3PKM is placed in MjCas6, the RNA-protein interactions appear to be unobstructed by the above intermolecular contacts. Thus, the tandem array of MjCas6 observed in the crystal might represent a possible assembly for processing CRISPR RNA, which by definition contains palindromic repeats.
The monomer-monomer interfaces bury 620 Å2 (around β8) and 540 Å2 (β10–β11) on each protein, accounting for 9% of the total surface area (12,800 Å2). The corresponding free energy changes (ΔG), as estimated by PISA server [26] (www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/prot_int/pistart.html), are −2.5 and −5.0 kcal/mol, which indicate preferred intermolecular association. In comparison, the inter-array contacts in the crystal bury less than 200 Å2 on each monomer, with ΔG ranging from −2.0 to +2.5 kcal/mol. Besides, each bound phosphate ion buries about 100 Å2 surface areas and contributes ΔG of −3 to −7 kcal/mol to the interface. The analyses suggest that the tandem array is a favored oligomer formation, and it could be enhanced by the presence of nucleic acids, which contain phosphate. Nevertheless, further experiments such as a electrophoretic mobility shift assay with a cross-linking reagent and/or nucleic acids are necessary to validate this hypothetical model.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Protein Production

The Cas6 gene of 762-bp (encoding 254 amino acid residues) from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii DSM 2661 genomic DNA was amplified by using the polymerase chain reaction and inserted into a T7 promoter-driven expression system (modified pET21b vector, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). The resulting recombinant Cas6 protein contains a His6-tag at its C-terminus for purification (Table 2). The recombinant Cas6 protein was overexpressed in Escherichia coli strain BL21(DE3) cells. The transformed cells were cultured at 310 K in 1 L Luria-Bertani medium, containing 25 μg mL−1 ampicillin. When the cells had reached an optical density (OD600) of 1.0, the expression of the recombinant Cas6 protein was induced with 1.0 mM isopropyl β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 293 K for 20 h. The cells were then harvested by centrifugation at 1590 g for 30 min at 277 K. The cell pellet was resuspended in a lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 500 mM NaCl, and 5 mM imidazole. To remove cell debris and insoluble proteins, the lysed cells by sonication were centrifuged at 20,000× g for 90 min at 277 K. The supernatant was loaded to a Ni-NTA His-bind resin (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) pre-equilibrated with the lysis buffer. It was subsequently washed with a washing buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM NaCl, and 10 mM imidazole (pH 8.0)). The Cas6 protein was eluted with a 0–200 mM linear gradient of imidazole. The fraction was concentrated by an Amicon Ultra-15 3 K Centrifugal Filter Device (3-kDa cutoff, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The final purification of Cas6 protein was achieved by a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex-200 size-exclusion column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated in gel filtration buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 100 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, and 2 mM TCEP). The purified Cas6 protein was spin concentrated using a vivaspin centrifugal filter (GE Healthcare, MW cut-off 10 kDa) to 5 mg mL−1 for crystallization screening. Homogeneity of the purified protein was determined by scanning densitometry of Coomassie Blue-stained protein on a 12% (v/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel. The protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method [27] with a standard curve of bovine serum albumin.

3.2. Crystallization

The initial crystallization screening were performed with commercially available kits from Hampton Research (Index, PEG/Ion, PEGR, PEGRX, Crystal Screen, and Crystal Screen 2), Emerald BioSystems (Wizard I–IV, PACT 1–2), Jena Bioscience (JCSG++1, JCSG++2), and Molecular Dimensions (PGA Screen, Clear Strategy Screen I and II) by using the sitting-drop vapor-diffusion method in 24-well Cryschem plates (Hampton Research, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA). Some preliminary crystals were found in the A5 well of the kit JCSG++2. The optimized condition comprising 100 mM HEPES sodium salt (pH 7.5), 600 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate, and 600 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate was used to produce the best crystals. The crystals were mounted separately using a nylon loop for X-ray diffraction data collection. The crystal growth parameters are summarized in Table 3.

3.3. Data Collection

Several cryoprotectants were used for data collection under cryogenic conditions, including glycerol, ethylene glycol, polyethylene glycol 400, and 2-methyl-2,4-pentane-diol. The best cryoprotectant was 25% (v/v) glycerol. The crystals of Cas6 protein were transferred into the reservoir solution with 25% (v/v) glycerol before being flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen. X-ray diffraction data were collected at 100 K on the BL13C1 beamline at the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (NSRRC), Taiwan. The crystal was rotated through a total angle of 360° with 1.0° oscillation per frame. The exposure time was set to 30 s. The crystal-to-detector distance was maintained at 200 mm. A total of 360 images were recorded using an ADSC Quantum 315R CCD detector. The diffraction data were indexed and integrated using the processing software HKL2000 [28]. Crystal parameters and data collection statistics are summarized in Table 1; MjCas6 PDB:5YI6.

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (NSRRC, Taiwan) for assistance during data collection. This work was supported by grants from the National Science Council (NSC99-2313-B-241-001 and NSC100-2313-B-241-006 to Yeh Chen) and by the Taiwan Protein Project (MOST105-0210-01-12-01 and MOST106-0210-01-15-04).

Author Contributions

Ming-Chang Lee and Shih-Ting Tseng designed experiments. Juan-Cheng Yang, Shu-Min Kuan, Ming-Chang Lee, Hsiu-Lin Chen, Guor-Cheng Fang, Chun-Chiu Wang, and Ming-Chiu Chang performed the experiments. Shang-Chuen Wu and Ming-Jen Chen analyzed the dataset. Tung-Ju Hsieh, established and refined the structue. Winn-Jung Hung, Tzu-Ping Ko, and Yeh Chen designed, supervised the project and interpreted data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Terns, M.P.; Terns, R.M. CRISPR-based adaptive immune systems. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2011, 14, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sorek, R.; Lawrence, C.M.; Wiedenheft, B. CRISPR-mediated adaptive immune systems in bacteria and archaea. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2013, 82, 237–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jiang, F.; Doudna, J.A. The structural biology of CRISPR-Cas systems. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2015, 30, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jackson, R.N.; Wiedenheft, B. A conserved structural chassis for mounting versatile CRISPR RNA-guided immune responses. Mol. Cell 2015, 58, 722–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Makarova, K.S.; Wolf, Y.I.; Alkhnbashi, O.S.; Costa, F.; Shah, S.A.; Saunders, S.J.; Barrangou, R.; Brouns, S.J.J.; Charpentier, E.; Haft, D.H.; et al. An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR–Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 13, 722–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bhaya, D.; Davison, M.; Barrangou, R. CRISPR-cas systems in bacteria and archaea: Versatile small RNAs for adaptive defense and regulation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2011, 45, 273–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jansen, R.; van Embden, J.D.A.; Gaastra, W.; Schouls, L.M. Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 43, 1565–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Brouns, S.J.J.; Jore, M.M.; Lundgren, M.; Westra, E.R.; Slijkhuis, R.J.H.; Snijders, A.P.L.; Dickman, M.J.; Makarova, K.S.; Koonin, E.V.; van der Oost, J. Small CRISPR RNAs guide antiviral defense in prokaryotes. Science 2008, 321, 960–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Koonin, E.V.; Makarova, K.S.; Zhang, F. Diversity, classification and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2017, 37, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Haft, D.H.; Selengut, J.; Mongodin, E.F.; Nelson, K.E. A guild of 45 CRISPR-Associated (Cas) protein families and multiple CRISPR/Cas subtypes exist in prokaryotic genomes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2005, 1, e60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Vestergaard, G.; Garrett, R.A.; Shah, S.A. CRISPR adaptive immune systems of Archaea. RNA Biol. 2014, 11, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hale, C.; Kleppe, K.; Terns, R.M.; Terns, M.P. Prokaryotic silencing (psi)RNAs in Pyrococcus furiosus. RNA 2008, 14, 2572–2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Niewoehner, O.; Jinek, M.; Doudna, J.A. Evolution of CRISPR RNA recognition and processing by Cas6 endonucleases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 1341–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sefcikova, J.; Roth, M.; Yu, G.; Li, H. Cas6 processes tight and relaxed repeat RNA via multiple mechanisms: A hypothesis. BioEssays 2017, 39, 1700019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Matthews, B.W. Solvent content of protein crystals. J. Mol. Biol. 1968, 33, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vagin, A.; Teplyakov, A. Molecular replacement with MOLREP. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 2010, 66, 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. McCoy, A.J.; Grosse-Kunstleve, R.W.; Storoni, L.C.; Read, R.J. Likelihood-enhanced fast translation functions. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2005, 61, 458–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Emsley, P.; Lohkamp, B.; Scott, W.G.; Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010, 66, 486–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Emsley, P.; Cowtan, K. Coot: Model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004, 60, 2126–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Adams, P.D.; Afonine, P.V.; Bunkóczi, G.; Chen, V.B.; Davis, I.W.; Echols, N.; Headd, J.J.; Hung, L.-W.; Kapral, G.J.; Grosse-Kunstleve, R.W.; et al. PHENIX: A comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010, 66, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kielkopf, C.L.; Lücke, S.; Green, M.R. U2AF homology motifs: Protein recognition in the RRM world. Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 1513–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, R.; Preamplume, G.; Terns, M.P.; Terns, R.M.; Li, H. Interaction of the Cas6 riboendonuclease with CRISPR RNAs: Recognition and cleavage. Structure 2011, 19, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Park, H.-M.; Shin, M.; Sun, J.; Kim, G.S.; Lee, Y.C.; Park, J.-H.; Kim, B.Y.; Kim, J.-S. Crystal structure of a Cas6 paralogous protein from pyrococcus furiosus. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 2012, 80, 1895–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Carte, J.; Wang, R.; Li, H.; Terns, R.M.; Terns, M.P. Cas6 is an endoribonuclease that generates guide RNAs for invader defense in prokaryotes. Genes Dev. 2008, 22, 3489–3496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Calvin, K.; Li, H. RNA-splicing endonuclease structure and function. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2008, 65, 1176–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Krissinel, E.; Henrick, K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 372, 774–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Otwinowski, Z.; Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 1997, 276, 307–326. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) SDS-PAGE analysis of purified MjCas6 protein. The left lane contains molecular weight markers (labeled in kDa). Lane 1 contains the MjCas6 protein after Ni-NTA column purification; Lane 2 contains MjCas6 after SEC. (b) SEC elution profile of Cas6 protein.
Figure 1. (a) SDS-PAGE analysis of purified MjCas6 protein. The left lane contains molecular weight markers (labeled in kDa). Lane 1 contains the MjCas6 protein after Ni-NTA column purification; Lane 2 contains MjCas6 after SEC. (b) SEC elution profile of Cas6 protein.
Crystals 07 00344 g001
Figure 2. Crystals of MjCas6 protein (a) before and (b) after condition optimization. The crystal dimensions were approximately 0.4 × 0.3 × 0.1 mm3.
Figure 2. Crystals of MjCas6 protein (a) before and (b) after condition optimization. The crystal dimensions were approximately 0.4 × 0.3 × 0.1 mm3.
Crystals 07 00344 g002
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction pattern of MjCas6 protein crystal. The image was recorded at the NSRRC 13C1 beamline from a flash-cooled crystal in 25% glycerol.
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction pattern of MjCas6 protein crystal. The image was recorded at the NSRRC 13C1 beamline from a flash-cooled crystal in 25% glycerol.
Crystals 07 00344 g003
Figure 4. Structure of MjCas6 monomer. The protein is shown as a ribbon model on the top left, spectrum colored from N- (blue) to C-terminus (red). At the top right is a surface model colored blue for positive and red for negative electrostatic potentials. It is viewed from the “back” side of the ribbon model. In the middle is a schematic topology diagram of this protein (left) and some representative 2Fo-Fc electron densities (right, level = 1.0σ). At the bottom is a stereo view of MjCas6 (rainbow) superimposed on the models from PDB 3I4H (gray), 3PKM (black), and 3UFC (purple).
Figure 4. Structure of MjCas6 monomer. The protein is shown as a ribbon model on the top left, spectrum colored from N- (blue) to C-terminus (red). At the top right is a surface model colored blue for positive and red for negative electrostatic potentials. It is viewed from the “back” side of the ribbon model. In the middle is a schematic topology diagram of this protein (left) and some representative 2Fo-Fc electron densities (right, level = 1.0σ). At the bottom is a stereo view of MjCas6 (rainbow) superimposed on the models from PDB 3I4H (gray), 3PKM (black), and 3UFC (purple).
Crystals 07 00344 g004
Figure 5. Association of MjCas6 monomers. At the top, an array of protein molecules are colored green, cyan, magenta, and yellow for the four independent monomers in an asymmetric unit. Two types of contacts are shown in close-up views. At the bottom, a model with bound RNA (orange, taken from PDB 3PKM) is viewed approximately 90° from the top.
Figure 5. Association of MjCas6 monomers. At the top, an array of protein molecules are colored green, cyan, magenta, and yellow for the four independent monomers in an asymmetric unit. Two types of contacts are shown in close-up views. At the bottom, a model with bound RNA (orange, taken from PDB 3PKM) is viewed approximately 90° from the top.
Crystals 07 00344 g005
Table 1. Data collection and refinement statistics of Cas6 (values in parentheses are for the outermost shell).
Table 1. Data collection and refinement statistics of Cas6 (values in parentheses are for the outermost shell).
Data Collection
Space groupC2
Cell dimensions
a, b, c (Å)200.84, 85.26, 100.06
α, β, γ (°)90.00, 118.47, 90.00
Resolution (Å)30.0–1.85 (1.92–1.85)
Rmeas (%)8.4 (58.6)
I/σ (I)17.3 (2.0)
Completeness (%)99.7 (99.7)
Redundancy3.7 (3.7)
Refinement
Resolution (Å)29.1–1.85 (1.92–1.85)
No. reflections125,321 (12,110)
Rwork/Rfree0.167/0.194
B2)/No. atoms
Protein29.8/8038
Ligand + ion67.9/154
Water43.3/1098
R.m.s. deviations
Bond lengths (Å)0.011
Bond angles (°)1.02
Table 2. MjCas6 protein production information.
Table 2. MjCas6 protein production information.
Source OrganismMethanocaldococcus jannaschii DSM 2661
DNA sourceATCC: The Global Bioresource center
Forward primer 5′-GGGAATTCCATATGATGAGGGAGAGTATGAGAA-3′
Reverse primer 5′-CCGCTCGAGAATTTTTGTTTTGAGTTTTTTATT-3′
Expression vectorModified pET21b
Expression hostE. coli BL21(DE3)
Complete amino-acid sequence of the construct producedMRESMRIELELQTDNFTVIPYNHQYYLASAIYNKIHSANPAYAKRLHNYQKFKFFTFSLLQIRKRVIRKEGIETIDGKAYLYISSPNNEFIENFVAGLLEDGKLRVGNVEFFVRKAKILPIPKKFNILKTISPIYLKTMIETEDGLKTYDLLPNNSKFYENLKNNLKKKYEAFYNEKCDMNFEFEVLKFRPKRMRIKNDIYCRCSEMVFKVWGDYDLIKFGYECGFGEKNSMGFGMVVNVEDKNQKNKKLKTKILEHHHHHH
The NdeІ site is underlined; The XhoІ site is underlined.
Table 3. Crystallization of MjCas6.
Table 3. Crystallization of MjCas6.
MethodSitting-Drop Vapor Diffusion
Plate typeIntelli-plate 48-3
Temperature (K)277.15
Protein concentration (mg mL−1)14.3
Buffer composition of protein solution50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 100 Mm NaCl, 5% Glycerol, 2 mM TCEP
Composition of reservoir solution100 mM HEPES Sodium Salt pH 7.5, 600 mM Sodium dihydrogen Phosphate, 600 mM Potassium dihydrogen Phosphate
Volume (μL) and ratio of drop2 (1:1 ratio of protein and reservoir)
Volume of reservoir (μL)180

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, M.-C.; Tseng, S.-T.; Yang, J.-C.; Hsieh, T.-J.; Wu, S.-C.; Kuan, S.-M.; Chen, M.-J.; Chang, M.-C.; Wang, C.-C.; Chen, H.-L.; et al. Expression, Purification, Crystallization, and X-ray Structural Analysis of CRISPR-Associated Protein Cas6 from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii. Crystals 2017, 7, 344. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst7110344

AMA Style

Lee M-C, Tseng S-T, Yang J-C, Hsieh T-J, Wu S-C, Kuan S-M, Chen M-J, Chang M-C, Wang C-C, Chen H-L, et al. Expression, Purification, Crystallization, and X-ray Structural Analysis of CRISPR-Associated Protein Cas6 from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii. Crystals. 2017; 7(11):344. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst7110344

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Ming-Chang, Shih-Ting Tseng, Juan-Cheng Yang, Tung-Ju Hsieh, Shang-Chuen Wu, Shu-Min Kuan, Ming-Jen Chen, Ming-Chiu Chang, Chun-Chiu Wang, Hsiu-Lin Chen, and et al. 2017. "Expression, Purification, Crystallization, and X-ray Structural Analysis of CRISPR-Associated Protein Cas6 from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii" Crystals 7, no. 11: 344. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst7110344

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop