Next Article in Journal
Borates—Crystal Structures of Prospective Nonlinear Optical Materials: High Anisotropy of the Thermal Expansion Caused by Anharmonic Atomic Vibrations
Previous Article in Journal
Growth and Physical Properties of SrxCa1−xCrO3 Single Crystals
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Crystals
Volume 7
Issue 3
10.3390/cryst7030092
crystals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Two Organic Cation Salts Containing Tetra(isothiocyanate)cobaltate(II): Synthesis, Crystal Structures, Spectroscopic, Optical and Magnetic Properties

by
Zheng Zhang
1,
Junwei Xu
2,
Sisi Yan
2,
Yangli Chen
2,
Yan Wang
1,
Zhuo Chen
1,* and
Chunlin Ni
2,*
1
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Central South University, Changsha 410012, China
2
College of Materials and Energy, Institute of Biomaterial, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2017, 7(3), 92; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst7030092
Submission received: 13 January 2017 / Revised: 17 March 2017 / Accepted: 17 March 2017 / Published: 22 March 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Crystal Engineering)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Single crystals of two hybrid organic-inorganic molecular solids, benzyl pyridinium tetra(isothiocyanate)cobalt ([BzPy]2[Co(NCS)4]) (1) and benzyl quinolinium tetra(isothiocyanate)cobalt ([BzQl]2[Co(NCS)4]) (2), were grown using a slow evaporation growth technique at room temperature and their IR, UV-Vis, X-ray crystal structures, luminescence, and magnetism were reported. The crystal structural analysis revealed that two molecular solids crystallize in the monoclinic space group P21/c of 1 and P21/n of 2. The cations form a dimer through weak C–H···π/π···π interactions in 1 and 2, and the adjacent cation (containing N(6) atom) in 2 forms a columnar structure through π···π weak interactions between the quinoline and benzene rings, while the anions in 1 form a layer structure via short S···Co interactions. The anions (A) and cations (C) are arranged alternatively into a column in the sequence of ···A–CC–A–CC–A··· for 1, while the two anions and cationic dimer in 2 form an alliance by the C–H···π, C–H···S and C–H···N hydrogen bonds. A weak S···π interaction was found in 1 and 2. The two molecular solids show a broad fluorescence emission around 400 nm in the solid state at room temperature, and weak antiferromagnetic coupling behavior when the temperature is lowered.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

During the last two decades, hybrid organic-inorganic molecular materials based on organic cations and inorganic complex anions have played a major role in the development of advanced functional materials. They have attracted the interest of scientists due to their special structural features and physical properties, which include novel catalytic, non-linear optical, conductive, fluorescent and magnetic properties [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Among these compounds, the transition metal complexes anion (based on the thiocyanate or isothiocyanate ligand) attracts much interest as these ions may coordinate either through the N or S atom as a monodentate ligand, or though N and S atoms as a bridging ligand, forming some complexes with one-, two- or three-dimensional networks [4,8,9,10]. In particular, the inherent coordination angle of the isothiocyanate species leads to a wide range of various molecular solids containing [M(NCS)4]2− (M = Mn2+, Co2+, Zn2+), which may exhibit interesting magnetic behaviors, electronic, and optical properties [11,12,13,14,15]. The selection of the counter organic cation is of key importance as it controls the stacking of the whole molecule, and the non-covalent interactions (such as weak p···π/π···π stacking interactions and hydrogen bonds) also play an important role in the arrangement of the structural units of molecular solids [16,17,18]. Our previously published studies have been devoted to the syntheses, X-ray single crystal structures, spectroscopic studies, magnetic or fluorescent properties of hybrid materials based on the tetra(isothiocyanate)cobalt/zinc anion and substituted benzyl triphenylphosphonium cations. The examples of [4RBzTPP]2[Co(NCS)4] (R = H, F, Br, NO2) [19,20], [3BrBzTPP]2[Co(NCS)4] (R = Br, CN) [21], [2ClBzTPP]2[Co(NCS)4] and [4ClBzTPP]2[Co(NCS)4] [22] and [4RBzTPP]2[Zn(NCS)4] (R = H, NO2) [23] illustrate the importance of the size of the counterion. In our recent report on [4NO2BzPy]2[Co(NCS)4] [24], the [Co(NCS)4]2− anions formed an unusual layer structure through S···N and S···Co interactions, and the [4NO2BzPy]+ cations were stacked into a 1D column by the weak p···π interactions. These observations have sparked our continuing research interest, and therefore, in this work, we introduced benzyl pyridinium ([BzPy]+) and benzyl quinolinium ([BzQl]+) into the system containing [Co(NCS)4]2− anions and obtained two new hybrid materials, [BzPy]2[Co(NCS)4] 1 and [BzQl]2[Co(NCS)4] 2, whose crystal structures, spectroscopic, optical and magnetic properties have been investigated. It is of much interest that two solids exhibit dual functionalities such as antiferromagnetic behavior and luminescent activity.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Single Crystal XRD and Powder XRD

The structural analysis of 1 and 2 were carried out on grown crystals using a Bruker SMART APEX (Göttingen, Germany) X-ray diffractometer at 291 K. [BzPy]2[Co(NCS)4] (1) crystallizes in monoclinic system with P21/c space group, whose asymmetric cell unit consisted of one [Co(NCS)4]2− anion and two [BzPy]+ cations (Figure 1a). The [Co(NCS)4]2− anion exhibits a distorted tetrahedral coordination geometry with an average Co-N bond distance of 1.952(3) Å and an average N–Co–N bond angle of 107.20(12)°. Some important bond lengths and bond angles are listed in Table 1, and these values agree with reported molecular solids comprised of [Co(NCS)4]2− anions [18,24]. Two [BzPy]+ cations adopt a formation in which one pyridine ring and one phenyl ring are twisted with respect to a C–C–N reference plane. In the [BzPy]+ cation moiety containing the N(5) atom, the dihedral angles subtended by the phenyl ring and pyridine ring make with the reference plane (defined by C(10)−C(11)−N(5)) are 31.4(2)° (θ1) and 68.5°(2) (θ2), respectively, while the phenyl and pyridine rings make a dihedral angle of 83.3(2)° (θ3). For the [BzPy]+ cation moiety containing the N(6) atom, the θ1, θ2 and θ3 are 52.7(2)°, 66.9(2)° and 84.2(2)°, respectively.
As seen in Figure 1b, the [Co(NCS)4]2− anions formed a layer structure through S···Co short interactions (the S(4)···Co(1A) and S(3B)···Co(1) distances of 4.205(2) and 4.032(2) Å) along the ac-direction [25,26]. The nearest Co···Co distance was 8.749 Å. It was found that the neighboring cations containing the N(5) atom formed a dimer through C−H···π weak interactions (Figure 2a), and the H(16) to the centroid of the C(5)–C(10) ring distance (d1) was 2.923(2) Å. As seen in Figure 2b, π···π interactions were present between the phenyl (molecule with N6) and the pyridyl (molecule with N5) rings in the crystals, with a distance 3.550(2) Å. Figure 2c shows the [Co(NCS)4]2− anions with the cationic dimers (containing a N(5) atom, denoted as C1C1) in alternate stacks forming an alternating columnar structure in a ···A–C1C1–A–C1C1··· sequence through C(7)–H(7)···N(4) (d2 = 2.810(2) Å) and C(11)–H(11A)···N(2) (d3 = 2.953(2) Å) hydrogen bonds. Amid the anions and cations (C2) containing the N(6) atom (Figure 2d), there existed a S···π interaction(d4) (S(1) to the centroid of the C(17B)–C(22B) ring distance of 3.714(2) Å) and C(20)–H(20)···N(4) hydrogen bond (Table 2). The regular stacks between anions and cations resulted in the formation of the 3D network of 1 (Figure S1).
Every unit cell of 2 contains one [Co(NCS)4]2− anion and two [BzQl]+ cations. In the [Co(NCS)4]2− anion, the average distance of Co–N bonds was 1.963(3), and the average N–Co–N bit angle was 108.86(15)°. These values are slightly bigger than those in 1. The dihedral angles θ1, θ2, and θ3 of the [BzQl]+ cation are 166.7(1)°, 82.7(1)°, 85.3(1)° for the cations containing the N(5) atom, and 132.2(1)°, 78.9(1)°, 78.2(1)° for the cations containing the N(6) atom. These values are obviously different from those in 1. In the [Co(NCS)4]2− anions of 2, the nearest Co···Co distance was 8.503(2) Å. The [BzQl]+ cations show an orderly stacking structure, for example, the cations containing the N(5) atom (C1) formed a dimer (Figure 3a) through π···π weak interactions between the quinoline rings in which the centroid of two quinoline rings distance was 3.787(2) Å (d1); while the cations containing the N(6) atom (C2) formed a chain (Figure 3b) through π···π weak interactions between the quinoline and benzene rings with a distance of 3.518(2) Å (d2). These ordered arrangements between the cations in 2 may be attributed to the bigger delocalized π conjugated system of the quinoline ring which can easily form π···π weak interactions when the pyridine ring of 1 changed to the quinoline ring of 2 in the cation. An interesting structure was found where a cationic dimer was surrounded by two [Co(NCS)4]2− anions, and formed an alliance via the C–H···N and C–H···S hydrogen bond (Figure 4a and Table 2). In addition, the S···π interactions [21], (the S(1) to centroid of C(5)–C(10) ring distance of 3.708(2) Å (d3)) and C(33)–H(33)···S(1) hydrogen bonds with a C(33)℘?℘S(1) distance of 3.701(2) Å were found between the anions and the cations (Figure 4b). These weak interactions (the bond parameters of hydrogen bonds listed in Table 2) improved the stabilization of the unit cell of 2 (Figure S2).
By comparing the packing structures of (1), (2) and [4NO2BzPy]2[Co(SCN)4] [24], it was found that when the anion was identical, the aromatic rings of the cation changed from pyridine to a quinoline ring, or a para-substituted group in the benzyl ring changed from H to NO2 groups, the anion stacking mode, the dihedral angles (θ1, θ2, and θ3), the cations stacking mode and the weak interactions of the cations and anions were significantly different.
The grown crystals of 1 and 2 were finely powered and subjected to powder XRD analysis by employing a Bruker D8 advance power X-ray diffractometer. The powdered samples were scanned over a range of 2θ values 10°–50° in steps of 0.02° at room temperature. As seen in Figure 5, the sharp nature of the peaks in the XRD patterns and the consistency of most of the peak positions in powder XRD and simulated XRD patterns from single crystal XRD using Mercury software from the Cambridge Structural Database System indicates the purity and excellent crystallinity of the grown crystals of 1 and 2.

2.2. UV-Vis Spectra

The UV-Vis absorption spectra (Figure 6) of 1 and 2 in MeCN (1.0 × 10−6 mol L−1) in the region of 220–800 nm are attributed to the anionic portions of these solids. The characteristic bands at 626, 319, 254 nm for 1 (Figure 6a) and 625, 318, 237 nm for 2 (Figure 6b), are assigned as d→d, L→L* and L(π)→M, respectively, and are basically similar to those observations in [4NO2BzPy]2[Co(NCS)4] [24].

2.3. Luminescent Properties

The luminescent properties of the two solids and the intermediate were all investigated in a solid state at room temperature (the intermediates [BzPy]Br (Benzyl pyridinium bromide) of 1 do not obtain solid fluorescence as it is semi-solid state at room temperature). As seen in Figure 7a, upon excitation at 241 nm, compound 1 showed two main luminescent emission peaks at 395 nm and 290 nm, while the main emission bands of both 2 and intermediate [BzQl]Br were found at 289 nm and 394 nm (Figure 7b), which may be attributed to the π*→π or n→π transition [27]. In addition, compounds 1 and 2 exhibited a strong emission band at 408 nm and a relatively weak emission band at 448 nm, which may be tentatively assigned to the metal-to-ligand charge transfer band between the Co(II) and the unoccupied π* orbitals of the isothiocyanate groups [28]. It is noteworthy that the luminescence intensity of λmax in 2 (186.9 a.u) is much stronger than the intermediate [BzQl]Br (benzyl quinolinium bromide) (28.23 a.u), which may be primarily attributed to the C–H···S, and C–H···N hydrogen bond interactions between the [Co(NCS)4]2− anions and [BzQl]+ cations [29].

2.4. Magnetic Properties

The crushed crystals of 1 and 2 were used to collect the variable-temperature (2–300 K) magnetic susceptibility data under a field of 2000 Oe. Plots of χm and χm − 1 versus T are shown in Figure 8a for 1 and Figure 8b for 2, while the plots of χmT versus T are shown in Figure S3a for 1 and Figure S3b for 2. The χMT value of 1 at 300 K was 2.457 emu K mol−1, which was slightly larger than the spin-only value of high-spin Co(II) (S = 3/2) at 1.875 emu K mol−1, indicating a contribution of the orbital momentum typical for the 4T1g ground state [30,31]. As the temperature was lowered, first, the χMT product smoothly decreased to 2.255 emu K mol−1 around 34 K, then sharply decreased to a low value (1.132 emu K mol−1) at 2.0 K (Figure S3a), indicative of an antiferromagnetic exchange. The data in χM−1 versus T plot is well fitted by the Curie–Weiss law (the solid line in Figure 8a) with the fitting parameters of C = 2.459 emu K mol−1 and θ = −3.641 K. The magnetic behavior of 2 also exhibited a very weak antiferromagnetic exchange interaction, and the best fit (the red solid line in Figure 8b) for the data in χM−1 versus T plot in the temperature range 2–300 K using the Curie–Weiss law was C = 2.410 emu K mol−1, and θ = −1.295 K. The magnetic behaviors of 1 and 2 are in accordance with their crystal structures, and similar to that in [4NO2BzPy][Co(NCS)4] [24]. Due to the large Co–Co distances between the neighboring centers, the magnetic behavior was due to single ion anisotropy with some contribution of antiferromagnetic exchange between the Co(II) centers. The magnetic coupling can be mediated through super-exchange interaction across the isothiocyanate orbitals, as well as the C–H···S, and C–H···N hydrogen bonds between the anion and the cation [31,32].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Benzyl bromide, pyridine, quinoline, CoCl2·6H2O, KSCN and other reagents were purchased from commercial sources and used without further purification. Benzyl pyridinium bromide ([BzPy]Br) and benzyl quinolinium bromide ([BzQl]Br) were prepared using the published methods in Reference [33].

3.2. Syntheses and Crystal Growth Method

Compound 1: [BzPy]2[Co(NCS)4] (the synthetic route is shown in Figure 9). A methanol solution (10 mL) of KSCN (0.20 g, 2 mmol) was added to a methanol solution (10 mL) of CoCl2·6H2O (0.12 g, 0.5 mmol), stirred and the mixture was stirred again for 45 min at room temperature. Next, then 20 mL methanol solution of [BzPy]Br (0.25 g, 1 mmol) was dropped into the mixture, cooled down for a further 1.5 h when all of the [BzPy]Br was added. The product was collected via filtration, wasted with cool methanol and diethyl ether, and air-dried. Yield: 82%. Anal. Calc. for C28H24N6CoS4: C, 53.24; H, 3.83; N, 13.30%; Found: C, 53.29; H, 3.95; N, 13.22%. IR spectrum (cm−1): 3057m (νa-H), 2920m (νasCH2), 2855m (νsCH2), 2069s (νC≡N), 1631m (νC=C), 1581s (νC=C), 1486m (νC=C), 1454m (νC=C), 1164s (ρCH2), 739m (δC–H), and 678m (δC–H). UV-Vis spectrum (nm): 254, 319, 626.
A similar procedure used to make Compound 1 was used to prepare Compound 2. Yield: 79%. Anal. Calc. for C36H28N6CoS4: C, 59.09; H, 3.86; N, 11.48%; Found: C, 59.15; H, 4.01; N, 11.56%. IR spectrum (cm−1): 3087m (νasC–H), 2923m (νas(CH2)), 2848m (νsCH2), 2065s (νC≡N), 1626m (νC=C), 1589s (νC=C), 1521m (νC=C), 1452m (νC=C), 1157s, 768m (δC–H), 719m (δC–H). UV-Vis spectrum (nm): 237, 318, 625.
The blue crystals suitable for X-ray structural analysis were obtained by evaporating the MeOH solution of 1 and 2 for around two weeks at room temperature.

3.3. Characterization Technique

Elemental analyses (carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen) were performed using a Perkin-Elmer (Massachusetts, MA, USA) Model 240C elemental analyzer. IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet (Wisconsin, WI, USA) FT-IR spectrophotometer in 4000–400 cm−1 regions with a KBr pellet. UV-Vis spectra were recorded (in acetonitrile) on a Shimadzu (Tokyo, Japan) UV-2500 spectrophotometer in the region of 250–800 nm. The power XRD pattern was analyzed by a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer (λ = 1.5406 Å). Single crystal XRD data were collected at room temperature using a Bruker SMART APEX instrument (Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å) for 1 and 2. Cell parameters were retrieved using SMART software [34] and refined using SAINTPlus (Göttingen, Germany) software [35] on all observed reflections. Data reductions were also performed using the SAINTPlus software. The structure was solved by direct method and refined by the least-squares methods on F2 using the SHELXTL (Göttingen, Germany) program package [36]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. Hydrogen atoms were located in the Fourier map and their positions refined with fixed isotropic thermal parameters. Details of the data collection, refinement and crystallographic data are summarized in Table 3.

3.4. Fluorescence Emission Spectra Measurements

Solid-state emission spectra upon excitation at 241 nm were recorded for the solid samples loaded into a sample cell (1 cm diameter) which was then fixed on a bracket at room temperature with a Hitachi F-7000 (Tokyo, Japan) fluorescence spectrophotometer. The excitation and emission slits used for the measurement of the solid state of the crystals were 2.5 and 5.0 nm wide, the scan speed was 240 nm/min−1, and the scan voltage was 400 V.

3.5. Magnetic Properties Measurements

Variable-temperature magnetic susceptibility measurements were carried out for 1 and 2 in the 2–300 K temperature range at a magnetic field of 0.2 T on ground polycrystalline samples with a Quantum Design MPMS-XL-7 (San Diego, CA, USA) super-conducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer. Samples were prepared by finely grinding single crystals into a powder and packing the powder into a gelatin capsule with weights of 34.36 mg and 60.40 mg for 1 and 2, respectively. The susceptibility data were corrected for the diamagnetic contributions deduced by the use of Pascal’s constant tables.

4. Conclusions

In summary, two new hybrid organic-inorganic molecular solids: (1) [BzPy]2[Co(NCS)4] and (2) [BzQl]2[Co(NCS)4] ([BzPy]+ = Benzyl pyridinium, [BzQl]+ = Benzyl quinolinium) were obtained and characterized. The crystal structural analysis revealed that two molecular metals crystallized in the monoclinic space group P21/c of 1 and P21/n of 2. The cations formed a dimer through weak C–H···π/π···π interactions in 1 and 2, and the adjacent cation (containing the N(6) atom) in 2 formed a columnar structure through π···π weak interactions between the quinoline and benzene rings. The anions of 1 formed a layer structure via short S···Co interactions. The anion (A) and cation (C1) were arranged alternatively into a column in the sequence of ···A−C1C1−A−C1C1−A··· for 1, while in 2, the two anions with a cationic dimer formed an alliance through the C–H···π, C–H···S and C–H···N hydrogen bonds. The S···π weak interaction was found in 1 and 2. So weak p···π/π···π stacking interactions and hydrogen bonds play an important role in the arrangement of the structural units of molecular solids. Two molecular solids showed a broad fluorescence emission around 400 nm and weak antiferromagnetic coupling behavior.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/7/3/92/s1, Figure S1: The packing diagram of 1 as viewed along a-axis, Figure S2: The packing diagram of 2 as viewed along a-axis, Figure S3: Plots of χmT versus T for 1 (a) and 2 (b).

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51301204), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFB0700304), and the Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Science and Technology Department (No. 2014A010105037).

Author Contributions

Zheng Zhang conceived and designed the experiments, undertook structural analyses and wrote the manuscript. Junwei Xu determined the crystal structures. Sisi Yan conducted XRD study. Yangli Chen conducted spectral study. Zhuo Chen and Yan Wang contributed conceptual details and supported this study. Chunlin Ni was the advisor on this research and checked the analysis of the results and revised the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, K.; Stiefel, E.I. Toward separation and purification of olefins using dithiolene complexes: An electrochemical approach. Science 2001, 291, 106–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tomoyuki, A.; Takayoshi, N. Control of assembly and magnetism of metal-dmit complexes by supramolecular cations. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 226, 3–9. [Google Scholar]
  3. Robertson, N.; Cronin, L. Metal bis-1,2-dithiolene complexes in conducting or magnetic crystalline assemblies. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2002, 227, 93–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Desiraju, G.R. Crystal engineering: From molecule to crystal. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 9952–9967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shapiro, A.; Landee, C.P.; Turnbull, M.M.; Jornet, J.; Deumal, M.; Novoa, J.J.; Robb, M.A.; Lewis, W. Synthesis, structure, and magnetic properties of an antiferromagnetic spin-ladder complex: Bis(2,3-dimethylpyridinium) tetrabromocuprate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 952–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, L.X.; Turnbull, M.M. Synthesis, structure, and magnetic behavior of bis(2-amino-5-fluoropyridinium) tetrachlorocuprate(II). Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 11254–11265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Vela, S.; Deumal, M.; Ribas-Arino, J.; Novoa, J.J. Tracing the sources of the different magnetic behavior in the two phases of the bistable (BDTA)2[Co(mnt)2] compound. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 8646–8648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Savard, D.; Leznoff, D.B. Synthesis, structure and light scattering properties of tetraalkylammonium metal isothiocyanate salts. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 14982–14991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Walker, I.M.; McCarthy, P.J. Charge-transfer spectra and photochemistry of the hexakis(isothiocyanato)ferrate(III) ion at cryogenic temperatures in diluent crystals. Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23, 1842–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kaye, S.S.; Long, J.R. Hydrogen storage in the dehydrated prussian blue analogues M3[Co(CN)6]2 (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6506–6507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Mrozinski, J.; Klak, J.; Kruszynski, R. Crystal structure and magnetic properties of the 1D bimetallic thiocyanate bridged compound: {(CuL1)[Co(NCS)(4)]}(L-1 = N-rac-5,12-Me-2-[14]-4,11-dieneN(4)). Polyhedron 2008, 27, 1401–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chattopadhyay, S.; Bhar, K.; Das, S.; Chantrapromma, S.; Fun, H.K.; Ghosh, B.K. Syntheses, structures and properties of homo- and heterobimetallic complexes of the type [Zn(tren)NCS](2)[M(NCS)(4)] [tren = tris(2-aminoethyl)amine; M = Zn, Cu]. J. Mol. Struct. 2010, 967, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Quan, Y.P.; Yin, P.; Han, N.N.; Yang, A.H.; Gao, H.L.; Cui, J.Z.; Shib, W.; Cheng, P. Novel hetero-polynuclear metal complexes (CuL)(3)[Mn(NCS)(5)](2) and (NiL)(3)[Mn(NCS)(5)](2) containing trigonal bipyramidal geometric [Mn(NCS)(5)](3-) as bridging ligand. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2009, 12, 469–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, L.L.; Yuan, R.X.; Liu, L.L.; Ren, Z.G.; Zheng, A.X.; Cheng, H.J.; Li, H.X.; Lang, J.P. Formation of [CuSCN](n)-Based topological structures via a family of flexible benzimidazolyl-based linkers with different spacer lengths. Cryst. Growth Des. 2010, 10, 1929–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, H.; Wang, X.M.; Zhang, K.C.; Teo, B.K. Molecular and crystal engineering of a new class of inorganic cadmium-thiocyanate polymers with host–guest complexes as organic spacers, controllers, and templates. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1999, 183, 157–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ghazzali, M.; Langer, V.; Oehrstroem, L. The role of intermolecular interactions in the assemblies of FeII and CoII tetrakis-isothiocyanatometalates with tris(1,10-phenanthroline)-RuII: Crystal structures of two dual-metal assemblies featuring octahedral cationic and tetrahedral anionic modules. J. Solid State Chem. 2008, 181, 2191–2198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ohba, M.; Okawa, H. Synthesis and magnetism of multi-dimensional cyanide-bridged bimetallic assemblies. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 198, 313–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, H.J.; Zhang, L.Z.; Cai, Z.G.; Yang, G.; Chen, X.M. Organic-inorganic hybrid materials assembled through weak intermolecular interactions: Synthesis, structures and non-linear optical properties of [4,4′-bipyH(2)][M(NCS)(4)] (M = Mn2+, Co2+ or Zn2+; 4,4′-bipy=4,4′-bipyridine). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2000, 14, 2463–2466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, X.; Chen, W.Q.; Han, S.; Liu, J.F.; Zhou, J.R.; Yu, L.L.; Yang, L.M.; Ni, C.L.; Hu, X.L. Two hybrid materials self-assembly from tetra(isothiocyanate)cobalt(II) dianion and substituted benzyl triphenylphosphinium. J. Mol. Struct. 2010, 984, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, X.; Dai, S.L.; Cheng, Z.P.; Liang, L.B.; Han, S.; Liu, J.F.; Zhou, J.R.; Yang, L.M.; Ni, C.L. Syntheses, crystal structures, and magnetic properties of two hybrid materials self-assembly from tetra(isothiocyanate)cobalt(II) anion and substituted benzyl triphenylphosphinium. Synth. React. Inorg. Met. Org. Nano Met. Chem. 2012, 42, 987–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, W.Q.; Su, L.J.; Cai, X.Q.; Yang, J.J.; Qian, Y.L.; Liu, X.P.; Yang, L.M.; Zhou, J.R.; Ni, C.L. Syntheses, crystal Structures, and magnetic properties of two meta-substituted benzyl triphenylphosphinium tetra(isothiocyanate)cobaltate(II) complexes. Synth. React. Inorg. Met. Org. Nano Met. Chem. 2014, 44, 980–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ye, H.Q.; Su, L.J.; Chen, X.X.; Liao, X.; Liu, Q.T.; Wu, X.Y.; Zhou, J.R.; Yang, L.M.; Ni, C.L. Syntheses, crystal structures, weak interaction, magnetic and luminescent properties of two new organic-inorganic molecular solids with substituted chlorobenzyl triphenylphosphinium and tetra (isothiocyanate)cobalt(II) anion. Synth. Met. 2015, 199, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ye, H.Q.; Xie, J.L.; Yu, J.Y.; Liu, Q.T.; Dai, S.L.; Huang, W.Q.; Zhou, J.R.; Yang, L.M.; Ni, C.L. Syntheses, crystal structures, luminescent properties of two new molecular solids with tetra(isothiocyanate)zinc(II) and substituted benzyl triphenylphosphonium cations. Synth. Met. 2014, 197, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ye, H.Q.; Li, Y.Y.; Huang, R.K.; Liu, X.-P.; Chen, W.Q.; Zhou, J.R.; Yang, L.M.; Ni, C.L. Unusual layer structure in an ion-paired compound containing tetra(isothiocyanate) cobalt(II) dianion and 4-Nitrobenzylpyridinium: Crystal structure and magnetic properties. J. Struct. Chem. 2014, 55, 691–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Allinger, N.L.; Zhou, X.F.; Bergsma, J. Molecular mechanics parameters. J. Mol. Struct. Theochem. 1994, 31, 269–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Batsanov, S.S. Van der Waals Radii of Elements. Inorg. Mater. 2001, 37, 871–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ma, L.F.; Wang, L.Y.; Hu, J.L.; Wang, Y.Y.; Yang, G.P. Syntheses, structures, and photoluminescence of a series of d(10) coordination polymers with R-Isophthalate (R = –OH, –CH3, and –C(CH3)(3)). Cryst. Growth Des. 2009, 9, 5334–5342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jiao, C.H.; He, C.H.; Geng, J.C.; Cui, G.H. Syntheses, structures, and photoluminescence of three cadmium(II) coordination polymers with flexible bis(benzimidazole) ligands. J. Coord. Chem. 2012, 65, 2852–2861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ashenhurst, J.; Wu, G.; Wang, S.N. Syntheses, Structures, Solution, and Solid-State 27Al NMR Studies of Blue Luminescent Mononuclear Aluminum Complexes: Al(7-azain)2(7-azain-H)(CH3), Al(7-azain)3(7-azain-H), and Al(7-azain)(7-azain-H)(OCH(CF3)2)2 (7-azain-H) 7-azaindole). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2541–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, B.L.; Wang, X.Y.; Zhu, X.; Gao, S.; Zhang, Y. Synthesis, crystal structure and magnetic behavior of two cobalt coordination polymers with 1,2-bis(1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)ethane and dicyanamide. Polyhedron 2007, 26, 5219–5224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wei, Y.Q.; Wu, K.C.; Broer, R.; Zhuang, B.T.; Yu, Y.F. A polymeric cobalt compound [Co(DCNT)(H2O)](n) with novel topology: Synthesis, structure, luminescence, and magnetic property. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2007, 10, 910–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Holman, K.T.; Hammud, H.H.; Isber, S.; Tabbal, M. One-dimensional coordination polymer [Co(H2O)4(pyz)](NO3)2·2H2O (pyz = pyrazine) with intra- and inter-chain H-bonds: Structure, electronic spectral studies and magnetic properties. Polyhedron 2005, 24, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bulgarevich, S.B.; Bren, D.V.; Movshovic, D.Y.; Finocchiaro, P.; Failla, S. Conformational investigation of N-aralkylpyridinium ions by cotton-mouten effect method. J. Mol. Struct. 1994, 317, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. SMART. Brucker Molecular Analysis Research Tool; Version 6.1; Bruker AXS: Madison, WI, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  35. SAINTPlus. Data Reduction and Correction Program; Version 6.01; Bruker AXS: Madison, WI, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  36. SHELXTL. Structure Determination Software Programs; Version 6.10; Shelddrick, G.M., Ed.; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
Crystals 07 00092 g001a 550Crystals 07 00092 g001b 550
Figure 1. (a) Oak Ridge Thermal Ellipsoid Plot (ORTEP) plot (30% probability ellipsoids) showing the molecule structure of 1. (b) The 2D layered structure of [Co(NCS)4]2− through S···Co interaction between anions for 1.
Figure 1. (a) Oak Ridge Thermal Ellipsoid Plot (ORTEP) plot (30% probability ellipsoids) showing the molecule structure of 1. (b) The 2D layered structure of [Co(NCS)4]2− through S···Co interaction between anions for 1.
Crystals 07 00092 g001aCrystals 07 00092 g001b
Crystals 07 00092 g002a 550Crystals 07 00092 g002b 550
Figure 2. (a) A dimer formed through C–H···π interactions between the cations (C1) of 1. (b) The π···π interactions between the cations (C1 and C2) of 1. (c) The 1D chain in ···A–C1C1–A–C1C1···sequence through C–H···N hydrogen bonds between the anions and cations (C1) of 1. (d) The S···π and C–H···N interactions between the anions and cations (C2) of 1.
Figure 2. (a) A dimer formed through C–H···π interactions between the cations (C1) of 1. (b) The π···π interactions between the cations (C1 and C2) of 1. (c) The 1D chain in ···A–C1C1–A–C1C1···sequence through C–H···N hydrogen bonds between the anions and cations (C1) of 1. (d) The S···π and C–H···N interactions between the anions and cations (C2) of 1.
Crystals 07 00092 g002aCrystals 07 00092 g002b
Crystals 07 00092 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) The cations (C1) form a dimer through π···π weak interactions between the quinoline rings of 2. (b) The cations (C2) form a chain structure via π···π weak interactions between the quinoline and benzyl rings of 2.
Figure 3. (a) The cations (C1) form a dimer through π···π weak interactions between the quinoline rings of 2. (b) The cations (C2) form a chain structure via π···π weak interactions between the quinoline and benzyl rings of 2.
Crystals 07 00092 g003
Crystals 07 00092 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) The cationic dimers with two [Co(NCS)4]2− anions formed an alliance through C–H···N and C–H···S hydrogen bonds of 2. (b) The S···π and C–H···S interactions between the anions and cations of 2.
Figure 4. (a) The cationic dimers with two [Co(NCS)4]2− anions formed an alliance through C–H···N and C–H···S hydrogen bonds of 2. (b) The S···π and C–H···S interactions between the anions and cations of 2.
Crystals 07 00092 g004
Crystals 07 00092 g005 550
Figure 5. Simulated and experimental powder XRD patterns of 1 (a) and 2 (b): (i) calculated from single crystal structural analysis (blue line) and (ii) experimental (red line).
Figure 5. Simulated and experimental powder XRD patterns of 1 (a) and 2 (b): (i) calculated from single crystal structural analysis (blue line) and (ii) experimental (red line).
Crystals 07 00092 g005
Crystals 07 00092 g006 550
Figure 6. UV-Vis spectra of 1 (a) and 2 (b) in MeCN.
Figure 6. UV-Vis spectra of 1 (a) and 2 (b) in MeCN.
Crystals 07 00092 g006
Crystals 07 00092 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Emission spectrum of 1 in a solid state at room temperature. (b) Emission spectra of 2 (black) and [BzQl]Br (red) in a solid state at room temperature.
Figure 7. (a) Emission spectrum of 1 in a solid state at room temperature. (b) Emission spectra of 2 (black) and [BzQl]Br (red) in a solid state at room temperature.
Crystals 07 00092 g007
Crystals 07 00092 g008a 550Crystals 07 00092 g008b 550
Figure 8. (a) Plots of χm and χm−1 versus T for 1. (b) Plots of χm and χm−1 versus T for 2. The solid lines are reproduced from the theoretical calculations and detailed fitting procedure described in the text.
Figure 8. (a) Plots of χm and χm−1 versus T for 1. (b) Plots of χm and χm−1 versus T for 2. The solid lines are reproduced from the theoretical calculations and detailed fitting procedure described in the text.
Crystals 07 00092 g008aCrystals 07 00092 g008b
Crystals 07 00092 g009 550
Figure 9. Synthetic route of the two complexes.
Figure 9. Synthetic route of the two complexes.
Crystals 07 00092 g009
Table
Table 1. Selected bond lengths and bond angles for 1 and 2.
Table 1. Selected bond lengths and bond angles for 1 and 2.
Compound12
Bond length (Å)
Co(1)–N(1)1.937(3) 1.958(3)
Co(1)–N(2)1.945(3)1.941(4)
Co(1)–N(3)1.968(3)1.966(3)
Co(1)–N(4)1.957(3)1.987(4)
N(1)–C(1)1.138(5)1.141(5)
N(2)–C(2)1.146(5)1.144(5)
N(3)–C(3)1.162(4)1.111(5)
N(4)–C(4)1.159(5)1.137(5)
S(1)–C(1)1.609(4)1.610(3)
S(2)–C(2)1.611(4)1.614(4)
S(3)–C(3)1.599(4)1.628(4)
S(4)–C(4)1.610(4)1.620(4)
Bond angles (°)
N(1)–Co(1)–N(2)115.60(12)109.48(14)
N(1)–Co(1)–N(3)106.98(12)110.66(15)
N(1)–Co(1)–N(4)110.11(12)105.50(15)
N(2)–Co(1)–N(3)110.20(12)109.80(14)
N(2)–Co(1)–N(4)105.08(12)117.37(16)
N(3)–Co(1)–N(4)108.75(12)103.81(14)
Co(1)–N(1)–C(1)173.2(3)177.0(3)
Co(1)–N(2)–C(2)171.5(3)172.6(4)
Co(1)–N(3)–C(3)172.2(3)168.8(3)
Co(1)–N(4)–C(4)173.2(3)161.0(3)
N(5)–C(11)–C(10)112.4(3)114.6(3)
Table
Table 2. The parameters (Å, °) of hydrogen bonds in 1 and 2.
Table 2. The parameters (Å, °) of hydrogen bonds in 1 and 2.
D−H···Ad (D−H)d (H···A)d (D···A)<(DHA)
Compound 1
C(7)–H(7)···N(4)#10.9702.9533.568(4)124.0
C(20)–H(20)···N(4)#20.9302.8713.668(3)144.0
Compound 2
C(9)–H(9)···N(5) 0.9302.5882.920(5)101.0
C(11)–H(11B)···S(3)#30.9702.7533.700(4)166.0
C(13)–H(13)···N(2)#40.9302.9263.648(4)130.0
C(14)–H(14)···N(3)#40.9302.9953.660(4)136.0
Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: #1 = −x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1; #2 = x − 1, −y + 1/2, z − 1/2; #3 = x, y − 1, z; #4 = −x, −y + 1, −z.
Table
Table 3. Crystal data and structure refinement for 1 and 2.
Table 3. Crystal data and structure refinement for 1 and 2.
Compounds12
Empirical formulaC28H24N6CoS4C36H28N6CoS4
Formula weight631.70731.81
Crystal systemMonoclinicMonoclinic
Space groupP21/cP21/n
a/Å8.749(1) 16.029(3)
b/Å20.062(3) 12.731(2)
c/Å17.527(2)19.010(3)
β/°96.28(1)111.29(1)
Volume, Å33058.0(7)3614.7(10)
Z44
Density (calculated), g/cm31.3721.345
Absorption coefficient, mm−10.8620.740
F(000)13001508
Crystal size/mm30.13 × 0.17 × 0.210.11 × 0.15 × 0.19
Reflections collected26,73625,478
Independent reflections5676 (Rint = 0.069)6353 (Rint = 0.037)
Data/restraints/parameters5676/0/3526353/0/424
Goodness of fit on F21.0001.067
Final R indices [I > 2σ (I)]R1 = 0.0480, wR2 = 0.0921R1 = 0.0462, wR2 = 0.1199
Final R indices (all data)R1 = 0.1034, wR2 = 0.1023R1 = 0.0726, wR2 = 0.1370
Largest Diff Peak and hole (e Å−3)0.232 and −0.3570.630 and −0.510

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Z.; Xu, J.; Yan, S.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Ni, C. Two Organic Cation Salts Containing Tetra(isothiocyanate)cobaltate(II): Synthesis, Crystal Structures, Spectroscopic, Optical and Magnetic Properties. Crystals 2017, 7, 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst7030092

AMA Style

Zhang Z, Xu J, Yan S, Chen Y, Wang Y, Chen Z, Ni C. Two Organic Cation Salts Containing Tetra(isothiocyanate)cobaltate(II): Synthesis, Crystal Structures, Spectroscopic, Optical and Magnetic Properties. Crystals. 2017; 7(3):92. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst7030092

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Zheng, Junwei Xu, Sisi Yan, Yangli Chen, Yan Wang, Zhuo Chen, and Chunlin Ni. 2017. "Two Organic Cation Salts Containing Tetra(isothiocyanate)cobaltate(II): Synthesis, Crystal Structures, Spectroscopic, Optical and Magnetic Properties" Crystals 7, no. 3: 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst7030092

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop