Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Aggregation-Induced Emission-Active Conjugated Polymers Composed of Group 13 Diiminate Complexes with Tunable Energy Levels via Alteration of Central Element
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of Responsive Hydrogel Nanoparticles upon Polyelectrolyte Complexation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Degradation of Polyester Polyurethane by Bacterial Polyester Hydrolases

1
Department of Microbiology and Bioprocess Technology, Institute of Biochemistry, Leipzig University, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
2
Leibniz Institute of Surface Modification, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2017, 9(2), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9020065
Submission received: 1 November 2016 / Revised: 1 February 2017 / Accepted: 10 February 2017 / Published: 16 February 2017

Abstract

:
Polyurethanes (PU) are widely used synthetic polymers. The growing amount of PU used industrially has resulted in a worldwide increase of plastic wastes. The related environmental pollution as well as the limited availability of the raw materials based on petrochemicals requires novel solutions for their efficient degradation and recycling. The degradation of the polyester PU Impranil DLN by the polyester hydrolases LC cutinase (LCC), TfCut2, Tcur1278 and Tcur0390 was analyzed using a turbidimetric assay. The highest hydrolysis rates were obtained with TfCut2 and Tcur0390. TfCut2 also showed a significantly higher substrate affinity for Impranil DLN than the other three enzymes, indicated by a higher adsorption constant K. Significant weight losses of the solid thermoplastic polyester PU (TPU) Elastollan B85A-10 and C85A-10 were detected as a result of the enzymatic degradation by all four polyester hydrolases. Within a reaction time of 200 h at 70 °C, LCC caused weight losses of up to 4.9% and 4.1% of Elastollan B85A-10 and C85A-10, respectively. Gel permeation chromatography confirmed a preferential degradation of the larger polymer chains. Scanning electron microscopy revealed cracks at the surface of the TPU cubes as a result of enzymatic surface erosion. Analysis by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy indicated that the observed weight losses were a result of the cleavage of ester bonds of the polyester TPU.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Polyurethanes (PU) are synthetic polymers present in many aspects of our daily life. Otto Bayer was the first to produce PU in 1937 by a polymerization reaction of di- or polyisocyanates and polyols [1]. By varying the nature of the components as well as the degree of cross-linking, PU materials with almost any desired properties can be synthesized [1]. For example, polyester or polyether polyurethanes can be synthesized by using polyester or polyether resins that contain hydroxyl groups [2]. PU is used in many industrial applications to produce foams, elastomers, coatings, adhesives and sealants applied in automotive, furniture, bedding, textiles, and other industrial areas [3]. The demand for PU in Europe amounted to 3.4 million tons in 2013 [4]. The large amounts of synthetic polymers produced has resulted in a massive increase of plastic waste requiring novel recycling strategies.
Both fungi [5,6,7,8] and bacteria [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17] have been reported to degrade PU materials. Darby and Kaplan were the first to test the susceptibility of different PU materials against fungal attack [7]. All polyester PU were found to be highly susceptible to degradation by Aspergillus, Penicillium, Pullularia, Trichoderma and Chaetomium species whereas polyether PU showed a higher resistance. The fungal strain PURDK2 has been reported to degrade urethane and urea bonds also in polyether PU [18]. Recently, eight further fungal strains isolated from environmental samples have been shown to degrade both polyester and polyether PU [19].
Among bacteria, Corynebacterium species, Enterobacter agglomerans and Bacillus subtilis species can efficiently degrade PU samples [12,16]. An esterase from Comamonas acidovorans TB-35 was reported as the responsible enzyme for the hydrolysis of the ester bonds in a polyester PU [20]. A polyamidase from Nocardia farcinica fused to a polymer binding module of a polyhydroxyalkanoate depolymerase from Alcaligenes faecalis has been reported to cleave the urethane bond in PU polyesters with different degrees of crystallinity [21].
Enzymes capable of hydrolyzing synthetic polyesters are produced by various moderate thermophilic actinomycetes, including Thermobifida alba AHK119 [22,23], Thermobifida fusca [24,25,26,27,28], Thermomonospora curvata DSM43183 [29] and Saccharomonospora viridis AHK 190 [30,31]. Recently, the polyester hydrolase LC cutinase (LCC) was identified using a metagenomic library derived from plant compost [32,33]. Polyester hydrolases from actinomycetes belong to the α/β hydrolase fold superfamily [25,34,35] and have catalytic properties between lipases and esterases [36]. The polyester hydrolases TfCut2, Tcur0390 and Tcur1278 isolated from Thermobifida fusca KW3 and Thermomonospora curvata DSM43183, respectively [35], as well as LCC have previously been shown to hydrolyze the synthetic aromatic polyester polyethylene terephthalate (PET) [26,29,32].
In this study we show that polyester hydrolases from actinomycetes are able to degrade both the anionic aliphatic polyester PU dispersion Impranil DLN and the thermoplastic polyester PU (TPU) Elastollan B85A-10 and C85A-10.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Genes, Enzymes and Chemicals

The synthetic gene constructs for LCC, Tcur0390 and Tcur1278 with adapted codon usage for Escherichia coli were synthesized by GeneArt Gene Synthesis (Life Technologies GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany). Impranil DLN, an aqueous polyester PU dispersion with a solids content of approx. 40% was kindly supplied by Bayer MaterialScience AG (Leverkusen, Germany). The highly pure TPU Elastollan B85A-10 and Elastollan C85A-10 without additives were kindly supplied by BASF Polyurethanes GmbH (Lemfoerde, Germany). All other chemicals were obtained from Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany) at highest purity available.

2.2. Cloning, Expression and Agar Plate Screening of the Polyester Hydrolase Genes

The synthetic gene constructs encoding Tcur0390 and Tcur1278 without the secretion signal peptides were amplified using the primers Tcur0390-FW (5′-TTTT GGA TCC G GCA AAT CCG TAT CAG CGT GG-3′), Tcur0390-RV (5′-TTTT GAA TTC CC CAT CGG ACA GGT AAA ACG TGC-3′), Tcur1278-FW (5′-TTTT GGA TCC G GCA AAT CCG TAT CAG CGT GG-3′) and Tcur1278-RV (5′-TTTT GAA TTC CC GGT ATG CGG ACA GGT ATC AC-3′) (the restriction sites for BamHI and EcoRI are underlined). The amplification of the genes encoding for TfCut2 and LCC as well as the cloning of all recombinant genes was performed as described before [37]. Transformants expressing active hydrolases were identified on turbid lysogeny broth (LB) agar plates containing 100 µg/mL ampicillin, 0.4 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and 0.5% Impranil DLN. The expression and purification of the recombinant enzymes was done as described before [38]. Amicon Ultra Centrifugal Filter Units (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) were used to concentrate the purified enzymes and change the buffer to 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0).

2.3. Turbidimetric Assay Using Impranil DLN Dispersion

Enzymatic hydrolysis of Impranil DLN dispersion (40%) was investigated by a turbidimetric assay. The samples with a final volume of 250 µL were prepared in 96 well plates containing 0.3 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0) and different amounts of the purified hydrolases. The reaction was started by adding Impranil DLN at a final concentration of 0.1%. The decrease of the turbidity of the samples was monitored by measuring the optical density at 400 nm (OD400) at constant time intervals of 7 s at room temperature. The hydrolysis rates were determined from the linear part of the graphs of the decreasing OD400 over time. All determinations were performed at least in duplicate. The rate constant of the surface reaction ks as well as the adsorption equilibrium constant K were determined by a kinetic model proposed by Mukai et al. [39]:
R = k s K [ E ] ( 1 + K [ E ] ) 2
where [E] is the enzyme concentration and R is the hydrolysis rate. This equation is converted to its linear form:
( [ E ] R ) 1 2 = K [ E ] α + 1 α
α = ( k s K ) 1 2

2.4. Degradation of Solid Polyester TPU Cubes

For the determination of the weight loss of TPU Elastollan B85A-10 and Elastollan C85A-10 following enzymatic degradation, TPU cubes (0.5 cm × 0.5 cm × 0.2 cm, about 80 mg) were added to reaction vials containing 50 µg of purified enzyme and 1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0) in a total volume of 1 mL. The vials were incubated at 60–70 °C on a thermo shaker (1000 rpm) for 100–200 h. The TPU degradation was quantified by measuring the weight loss of the TPU cubes. All measurements were made at least in triplicate.

2.5. Scanning Electron Microscopy

The Elastollan surface was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Ultra 55, Carl Zeiss SMT, Jena, Germany). The samples were preliminarily coated with a 50 nm layer of chrome to improve the conductivity.

2.6. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) measurements were performed in ATR (attenuated total reflection) mode with the FTIR spectrometer Vector 22 (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) and a diamond crystal (Specac, Kent, UK). With ATR-IR, only the outer surface of the samples is investigated. Changes in the IR spectra indicate a surface erosion process caused by the enzymes. The spectra were obtained in the wavenumber range of 550–4000 cm−1 using a spectral resolution of 2 cm−1.

2.7. Gel Permeation Chromatography

Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) of the TPU Elastollan B85A-10 and Elastollan C85A-10 were conducted using dimethylformamide (DMF) as eluent on a Waters GPC system (Waters Co., Milford, CT, USA) consisting of a Waters 1515 isocratic HPLC pump, a Waters 2414 refractive index detector, and Waters 717 autosampler. The system was equipped with three columns containing polyester copolymer particles (10 µm particle size, 1000 Å/100 Å/30 Å, 4.6 mm × 250 mm, PSS Polymer Standards Service GmbH, Mainz, Germany). The flow rate was set to 0.33 mL/min. The resulting data was evaluated using the Breeze software (Dallas, TX, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Hydrolysis of Impranil DLN by the Polyester Hydrolases

Cultures of E. coli expressing TfCut2, LCC, Tcur0390 and Tcur1278 formed halos on agar plates containing 0.5% Impranil DLN, indicating PU-degrading activity.
The kinetics of enzymatic degradation of a 0.1% Impranil DLN was analyzed using a turbidimetric assay. The OD400 of the substrate dispersion revealed a linear decrease in the initial reaction phase and then leveled off to 30%–40% of its initial value during degradation with all enzymes (data not shown). The initial hydrolysis rates were determined from the linear part of the decreasing OD400 values over the reaction time and were used to calculate the kinetic parameter as shown in Figure 1.
TfCut2 and Tcur0390 showed the highest hydrolysis rate constants of 0.026 s−1 for Impranil DLN (Table 1). The lowest enzyme concentration required to reach the maximum initial hydrolysis rate was obtained with TfCut2. The highest adsorption constant K was obtained with TfCut2, indicating its strong affinity to Impranil DLN.

3.2. Degradation of Solid Polyester TPU Cubes

Table 2 shows the weight loss of Elastollan B85A-10 and C85A-10 determined after enzymatic degradation at 60–70 °C for 100 h. Due to their lower thermal stability [29], Tcur0390 and Tcur1278 were not used for TPU degradation experiments at 70 °C. No significant weight loss was detected with negative control samples in the absence of enzymes. At 60 °C, a weight loss of about 1% was obtained with TfCut2 and LCC, whereas Tcur0390 and Tcur1278 caused only a minor weight reduction of the TPU cubes. At 70 °C, LCC caused weight losses of up to 3.2% which were significantly higher than those obtained with TfCut2. The better performance of LCC at 70 °C was likely the result of its higher thermostability compared to TfCut2 [35]. Elastollan B85A-10 appeared also to be more easily degradable by enzymes than C85A-10. Extending the reaction time to 200 h, LCC caused weight losses of 4.9% and 4.1% for Elastollan B85A-10 and C85A-10 at 70 °C, respectively. An analysis by SEM revealed large cracks at the surface of both solid TPU samples after a reaction time of 200 h with LCC (Figure 2). The Elastollan B85A-10 and C85A-10 samples were also analyzed by FTIR spectroscopy before and after hydrolysis by TfCut2 (Figure 3). The shift of the absorption peak at around 1726 to 1703 cm−1 indicated a change of the carbonyl group in the polyester components of TPU and thus the cleavage of ester bonds [40,41]. A reduction of the peaks at about 1170 and 1140 cm−1 which represent a C–O stretching also confirmed the change of the ester components of TPU [16]. Spectra obtained by FTIR spectroscopy following hydrolysis by LCC at 70 °C did not differ significantly from those obtained with TPU samples treated at 60 °C, indicating that the observed weight losses were in all cases a result of the cleavage of ester bonds, independent of the reaction temperature and the enzyme used.
GPC analysis revealed a significant decrease of up to 19% of the weight-averaged molecular weights (Mw) and of up to 21% of the peak molecular weights (Mp) of Elastollan B85A-10 and C85A-10 hydrolyzed by LCC compared to the negative control samples without enzyme (Table 3). The number-averaged molecular weight (Mn) of both Elsatollans did not change following incubations with the enzymes since the large proportion of bulk polymer inside the TPU cubes was not exposed to an enzymatic hydrolysis. The changes in Mw of the solid TPU samples indicated a preferential degradation of the longer polymer chains by the polyester hydrolase at the polymer surface.

4. Discussion

In this study, the polyester hydrolases TfCut2, Tcur0390, Tcur1278 and LCC were shown to degrade both dispersed and solid polyester PU materials. Impranil DLN is an aqueous aliphatic polyester PU dispersion made from a poly hexane/neopentyl adipate polyester and hexamethylene diisocyanate. It has been widely used as a substrate to detect PU-hydrolyzing activity of microbial strains. The recombinant E. coli colonies expressing the four polyester hydrolases produced clearing zones in agar media containing Impranil DLN. This PU substrate can also be used to detect enzymatic PU-degrading activity [9,10,42]. The PU degradation by fungal strains has been previously quantified by monitoring the change of the optical density of Impranil DLN dispersions at 600 nm following an incubation with the strains [19]. In this study, we developed a turbidimetric assay based on Impranil DLN to analyze the kinetics of enzymatic PU hydrolysis. Rapid PU degradation was observed with all four hydrolases as indicated by the decrease of OD400 in the first minutes of the reaction. In contrast to a similar assay developed for monitoring the enzymatic degradation of PET nanoparticle suspensions [43], Impranil DLN did not agglutinate in the presence of buffered enzyme solutions. It was therefore not necessary to immobilize the dispersed PU particles during the enzymatic reaction which enabled a high-throughput determination of the PU-hydrolyzing activity in microplate format.
For the hydrolysis of Impranil DLN, TfCut2 and Tcur0390 revealed the highest rate constants (Table 1). In contrast, Tcur0390 caused a significantly lower degradation performance of the Elastollan TPU cubes (Table 2). Increasing the amount of Tcur0390 did not result in a further degradation of the TPU cubes, suggesting that the enzymatic hydrolysis of Impranil DLN and Elastollan followed distinct kinetics due to their different composition. The dispersed PU Impranil DLN provided a larger specific surface area resulting in a better accessibility for the enzymes than the solid TPU materials. Indeed, the enzymatic hydrolysis of Impranil DLN was dependent on the enzyme concentration applied, especially Tcur0390, which showed a significantly lower substrate affinity than TfCut2 (Table 1).
Several publications have reported weight losses of PU materials after incubation with fungal or bacterial strains. A weight loss of a polyester PU foam was observed after incubation with Gliocladium roseum for 21 days [44] and weight losses of up to 17.7% were detected after incubation of this material with 16 bacterial strains for 12 weeks [12]. The fungal strain Cladosporium tenuissimum A2.PP.5 caused a weight loss of 65.3% from a polyether PU foam after incubation for 21 days at 25–30 °C [19]. In these studies, microorganisms were incubated for several weeks with the PU foams which provided a large surface area compared to the solid cubes of Elastollan used here, explaining the higher weight losses observed from the former PU material. In contrast, the enzymatic hydrolysis of the Elastollan cubes occurred solely at the surface of the material, as indicated by the cracks detected by SEM (Figure 2).
C. acidovorans TB-35 completely degraded polyester PU cubes of about 50 mg within seven days of incubation in a liquid medium supplemented with PU as the sole carbon source [45]. A cell-surface bound and a secreted esterase were isolated from this strain. The crude enzyme solution caused a weight loss of polyester PU cubes of 13% after a reaction time of 48 h at 30 °C [46]. Similar absolute weight losses of the Elastollan cubes were obtained with TfCut2 and LCC at 60 °C. Hydrolysis by LCC for 200 h at 70 °C resulted in the weight loss of 4.9% and 4.1% for Elastollan B85A-10 and C85A-10, respectively. TfCut2 caused only slightly higher weight losses at a reaction temperature of 70 °C (Table 2). This may be due to the lower thermal stability of TfCut2 compared to LCC [33,35]. GPC analysis of the Elastollan samples hydrolyzed by LCC showed a preferred degradation of the longer polymer chains indicated by a significant decrease of their Mw of about 20%.
The FTIR analysis of the enzymatically treated polyester TPU cubes indicated a cleavage of ester bonds in both Elastollan samples while the urethane bonds resisted the enzymatic hydrolysis (Figure 3). This result confirms previous reports which claimed that the esterase-catalyzed hydrolysis of polyester PU was mainly a result of the cleavage of ester bonds in the polyester polyol but not of the urethane bonds [16,20]. A turbidity of 30%–40% of the Impranil DLN dispersions remaining after enzymatic hydrolysis also indicated that the PU was only partially degraded by the polyester hydrolases.
In conclusion, we demonstrated the hydrolysis of both polyester PU dispersions and thermoplastic polyester PU cubes by the polyester hydrolases TfCut2, LCC, Tcur0390 and Tcur1278. A turbidimetric assay was validated for the kinetic analysis of the enzymatic degradation of Impranil DLN. While most studies have reported reaction temperatures for the enzymatic hydrolysis of PU of less than 40 °C [19,45,46], reaction temperatures of up to 70 °C were shown to significantly increase the enzymatic degradation of solid TPU materials. Hence, thermostable polyester hydrolases proved to be promising catalysts for the hydrolysis of solid polyester PU with potential applications in PU recycling processes.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Bayer MaterialScience AG and BASF Polyurethanes GmbH for supplying the PU materials Impranil DLN and Elastollan. The authors are indebted to Andrea Prager, Nadja Schönherr, and Gabriele Mirschel for conducting SEM, FTIR, and GPC measurements, respectively. This project was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (project 031A227E) and the Ciencia sem Fronteiras scholarship.

Author Contributions

Juliane Schmidt, Ren Wei, Thorsten Oeser and Wolfgang Zimmermann conceived the project and wrote the paper. Juliane Schmidt, Ren Wei, Lukas Andre Dedavid e Silva, Daniel Breite and Agnes Schulze performed the experiments and analyzed the data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bayer, O. Das Di-Isocyanat-Polyadditionsverfahren (Polyurethane). Angew. Chem. 1947, 59, 257–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Urbański, J. Handbook of Analysis of Synthetic Polymers and Plastics; Ellis Horwood: Chichester, UK, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  3. CIEC Promoting Science at the University of York. Polyurethanes. Available online: http://www.essentialchemicalindustry.org/polymers/polyurethane.html (accessed on 7 September 2015).
  4. Plastics Europe. Plastics—The Facts 2014/2015. An Analysis of European Plastics Production, Demand and Waste Data. Available online: http://www.plasticseurope.de/Document/plastics-the-facts-2014.aspx?Page=DOCUMENT&FolID=2 (accessed on 7 August 2016).
  5. Cosgrove, L.; McGeechan, P.L.; Robson, G.D.; Handley, P.S. Fungal Communities Associated with Degradation of Polyester Polyurethane in Soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 5817–5824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Crabbe, J.R.; Campbell, J.R.; Thompson, L.; Walz, S.L.; Schultz, W.W. Biodegradation of a Colloidal Ester-Based Polyurethane by Soil Fungi. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 1994, 33, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Darby, R.T.; Kaplan, A.M. Fungal Susceptibility of Polyurethanes. Appl. Microbiol. 1968, 16, 900–905. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Russell, J.R.; Huang, J.; Anand, P.; Kucera, K.; Sandoval, A.G.; Dantzler, K.W.; Hickman, D.; Jee, J.; Kimovec, F.M.; Koppstein, D.; et al. Biodegradation of Polyester Polyurethane by Endophytic Fungi. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 6076–6084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Howard, G.T.; Blake, R.C. Growth of Pseudomonas fluorescens on a Polyester–Polyurethane and the Purification and Characterization of a Polyurethanase–Protease Enzyme. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 1998, 42, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Howard, G.T.; Hilliard, N.P. Use of Coomassie Blue-Polyurethane Interaction in Screening of Polyurethanase Proteins and Polyurethanolytic Bacteria. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 1999, 43, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Howard, G.T.; Vicknair, J.; Mackie, R.I. Sensitive Plate Assay for Screening and Detection of Bacterial Polyurethanase Activity. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2001, 32, 211–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kay, M.J.; Morton, L.H.; Prince, E.L. Bacterial Degradation of Polyester Polyurethane. Int. Biodeterior. 1991, 27, 205–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nakajima-Kambe, T.; Shigeno-Akutsu, Y.; Nomura, N.; Onuma, F.; Nakahara, T. Microbial Degradation of Polyurethane, Polyester Polyurethanes and Polyether Polyurethanes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999, 51, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Oceguera-Cervantes, A.; Carrillo-García, A.; López, N.; Bolaños-Nuñez, S.; Cruz-Gómez, M.J.; Wacher, C.; Loza-Tavera, H. Characterization of the Polyurethanolytic Activity of Two Alicycliphilus. sp. Strains Able to Degrade Polyurethane and N-Methylpyrrolidone. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 6214–6223. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Rowe, L.; Howard, G.T. Growth of Bacillus subtilis on Polyurethane and the Purification and Characterization of a Polyurethanase-Lipase Enzyme. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2002, 50, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shah, Z.; Krumholz, L.; Aktas, D.F.; Hasan, F.; Khattak, M.; Shah, A.A. Degradation of Polyester Polyurethane by a Newly Isolated Soil Bacterium, Bacillus subtilis strain MZA-75. Biodegradation 2013, 24, 865–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hung, C.-S.; Zingarelli, S.; Nadeau, L.J.; Biffinger, J.C.; Drake, C.A.; Crouch, A.L.; Barlow, D.; Russell, J.N.; Crookes-Goodson, W.J. Carbon Catabolite Repression and Impranil Polyurethane Degradation in Pseudomonas protegens Strain Pf-5. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 6080–6090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Matsumiya, Y.; Murata, N.; Tanabe, E.; Kubota, K.; Kubo, M. Isolation and Characterization of an Ether-Type Polyurethane-Degrading Micro-Organism and Analysis of Degradation Mechanism by Alternaria. sp. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 108, 1946–1953. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Álvarez-Barragán, J.; Domínguez-Malfavón, L.; Vargas-Suárez, M.; González-Hernández, R.; Aguilar-Osorio, G.; Loza-Tavera, H. Biodegradative Activities of Selected Environmental Fungi on a Polyester Polyurethane Varnish and Polyether Polyurethane Foams. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 5225–5235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Akutsu, Y.; Nakajima-Kambe, T.; Nomura, N.; Nakahara, T. Purification and Properties of a Polyester Polyurethane-Degrading Enzyme from Comamonas acidovorans TB-35. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Gamerith, C.; Herrero Acero, E.; Pellis, A.; Ortner, A.; Vielnascher, R.; Luschnig, D.; Zartl, B.; Haernvall, K.; Zitzenbacher, S.; Strohmeier, G.; et al. Improving Enzymatic Polyurethane Hydrolysis by Tuning Enzyme Sorption. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2016, 132, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hu, X.; Osaki, S.; Hayashi, M.; Kaku, M.; Katuen, S.; Kobayashi, H.; Kawai, F. Degradation of a Terephthalate-Containing Polyester by Thermophilic Actinomycetes and Bacillus Species Derived from Composts. J. Polym. Environ. 2008, 16, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hu, X.; Thumarat, U.; Zhang, X.; Tang, M.; Kawai, F. Diversity of Polyester-Degrading Bacteria in Compost and Molecular Analysis of a Thermoactive Esterase from Thermobifida alba AHK119. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87, 771–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Billig, S.; Oeser, T.; Birkemeyer, C.; Zimmermann, W. Hydrolysis of Cyclic Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate) Trimers by a Carboxylesterase from Thermobifida fusca KW3. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87, 1753–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, S.; Tong, X.; Woodard, R.W.; Du, G.; Wu, J.; Chen, J. Identification and Characterization of Bacterial Cutinase. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 25854–25862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wei, R.; Oeser, T.; Schmidt, J.; Meier, R.; Barth, M.; Then, J.; Zimmermann, W. Engineered bacterial polyester hydrolases efficiently degrade polyethylene terephthalate due to relieved product inhibition. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016, 113, 1658–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Müller, R.-J.; Schrader, H.; Profe, J.; Dresler, K.; Deckwer, W.-D. Enzymatic Degradation of Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate): Rapid Hydrolyse Using a Hydrolase from T. fusca. Macromol. Rapid. Commun. 2005, 26, 1400–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Oeser, T.; Wei, R.; Baumgarten, T.; Billig, S.; Föllner, C.; Zimmermann, W. High Level Expression of a Hydrophobic Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate)-Hydrolyzing Carboxylesterase from Thermobifida fusca KW3 in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3). J. Biotechnol. 2010, 146, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Wei, R.; Oeser, T.; Then, J.; Kühn, N.; Barth, M.; Schmidt, J.; Zimmermann, W. Functional Characterization and Structural Modeling of Synthetic Polyester-Degrading Hydrolases from Thermomonospora curvata. AMB Express 2014, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kawai, F.; Oda, M.; Tamashiro, T.; Waku, T.; Tanaka, N.; Yamamoto, M.; Mizushima, H.; Miyakawa, T.; Tanokura, M. A Novel Ca2+-Activated, Thermostabilized Polyesterase Capable of Hydrolyzing Polyethylene Terephthalate from Saccharomonospora viridis AHK190. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 10053–10064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Miyakawa, T.; Mizushima, H.; Ohtsuka, J.; Oda, M.; Kawai, F.; Tanokura, M. Structural Basis for the Ca2+-Enhanced Thermostability and Activity of PET-Degrading Cutinase-Like Enzyme from Saccharomonospora viridis AHK190. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 4297–4307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sulaiman, S.; Yamato, S.; Kanaya, E.; Kim, J.-J.; Koga, Y.; Takano, K.; Kanaya, S. Isolation of a Novel Cutinase Homolog with Polyethylene Terephthalate-Degrading Activity from Leaf-Branch Compost by Using a Metagenomic Approach. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 1556–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sulaiman, S.; You, D.-J.; Kanaya, E.; Koga, Y.; Kanaya, S. Crystal Structure and Thermodynamic and Kinetic Stability of Metagenome-Derived LC-Cutinase. Biochemistry 2014, 53, 1858–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Longhi, S.; Cambillau, C. Structure-Activity of Cutinase, a Small Lipolytic Enzyme. Biochim Biophys Acta 1999, 1441, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wei, R.; Oeser, T.; Zimmermann, W. Synthetic Polyester-Hydrolyzing Enzymes from Thermophilic Actinomycetes. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 89, 267–305. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Martinez, C.; Geus, P.D.; Lauwereys, M.; Matthyssens, G.; Cambillau, C. Fusarium solani Cutinase is a Lipolytic Enzyme with a Catalytic Serine Accessible to Solvent. Nature 1992, 356, 615–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Schmidt, J.; Wei, R.; Oeser, T.; Belisário-Ferrari, M.R.; Barth, M.; Then, J.; Zimmermann, W. Effect of Tris, MOPS and Phosphate Buffers on the Hydrolysis of Polyethylene Terephthalate Films by Polyester Hydrolases. FEBS Open Bio 2016, 6, 919–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wei, R.; Oeser, T.; Billig, S.; Zimmermann, W. A High-Throughput Assay for Enzymatic Polyester Hydrolysis Activity by Fluorimetric Detection. Biotechnol. J. 2012, 7, 1517–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mukai, K.; Yamada, K.; Doi, Y. Kinetics and Mechanism of Heterogeneous Hydrolysis of Poly[(R)-3-Hydroxybutyrate] Film by PHA Depolymerases. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1993, 15, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jiao, L.; Xiao, H.; Wang, Q.; Sun, J. Thermal Degradation Characteristics of Rigid Polyurethane Foam and the Volatile Products Analysis with TG-FTIR-MS. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2013, 98, 2687–2696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Badri, K.B.; Sien, W.C.; Shahrom, M.S.; Hao, L.C.; Baderuliksan, N.Y.; Norzali, N.R. FTIR Spectroscopy Analysis of the Prepolymerization of Palm-Based Polyurethane. J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2010, 18, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  42. Stern, R.V.; Howard, G.T. The Polyester Polyurethanase Gene (pueA) from Pseudomonas chlororaphis encodes a Lipase. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2000, 185, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wei, R.; Oeser, T.; Barth, M.; Weigl, N.; Lübs, A.; Schulz-Siegmund, M.; Hacker, M.C.; Zimmermann, W. Turbidimetric Analysis of the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Polyethylene Terephthalate Nanoparticles. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2014, 103, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bentham, R.H.; Morton, L.H.G.; Allen, N.G. Rapid Assessment of the Microbial Deterioration of Polyurethanes. Int. Biodeterior. 1987, 23, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nakajima-Kambe, T.; Onuma, F.; Kimpara, N.; Nakahara, T. Isolation and Characterization of a Bacterium Which Utilizes Polyester Polyurethane as a Sole Carbon and Nitrogen Source. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1995, 129, 39–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Nakajima-Kambe, T.; Onuma, F.; Akutsu, Y.; Nakahara, T. Determination of the Polyester Polyurethane Breakdown Products and Distribution of the Polyurethane Degrading Enzyme of Comamonas acidovorans Strain TB-35. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1997, 83, 456–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Linear plots of ( [ E ] R ) 1 2 (circles) of Impranil DLN hydrolysis as a function of the concentration of (a) LCC; (b) TfCut2; (c) Tcur0390; and (d) Tcur1278. The fitting data (solid lines) are based on the kinetic model proposed by Mukai et al. [39] (Equation (2)). Error bars indicate the standard deviation of duplicate determinations.
Figure 1. Linear plots of ( [ E ] R ) 1 2 (circles) of Impranil DLN hydrolysis as a function of the concentration of (a) LCC; (b) TfCut2; (c) Tcur0390; and (d) Tcur1278. The fitting data (solid lines) are based on the kinetic model proposed by Mukai et al. [39] (Equation (2)). Error bars indicate the standard deviation of duplicate determinations.
Polymers 09 00065 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of TPU cube surfaces: (ac) Elastollan B85A-10; and (df) Elastollan C85A-10; (a,d) negative control samples without enzyme; and (b,c,e,f) following hydrolysis by LCC at 70 °C for 200 h.
Figure 2. SEM images of TPU cube surfaces: (ac) Elastollan B85A-10; and (df) Elastollan C85A-10; (a,d) negative control samples without enzyme; and (b,c,e,f) following hydrolysis by LCC at 70 °C for 200 h.
Polymers 09 00065 g002aPolymers 09 00065 g002b
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of (a,b) Elastollan B85A-10 and (c,d) Elastollan C85A-10: (a,c) negative control samples without enzyme and (b,d) following hydrolysis by TfCut2 at 60 °C for 100 h.
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of (a,b) Elastollan B85A-10 and (c,d) Elastollan C85A-10: (a,c) negative control samples without enzyme and (b,d) following hydrolysis by TfCut2 at 60 °C for 100 h.
Polymers 09 00065 g003
Table 1. Kinetic parameters of the enzymatic hydrolysis of Impranil DLN determined by the kinetic model proposed by Mukai et al. [39] (Equation (2)).
Table 1. Kinetic parameters of the enzymatic hydrolysis of Impranil DLN determined by the kinetic model proposed by Mukai et al. [39] (Equation (2)).
EnzymeK (µg−1)ks (s−1)R2
TfCut20.188 ± 0.0240.026 ± 0.0010.972
LCC0.038 ± 0.0090.022 ± 0.0020.955
Tcur03900.023 ± 0.0070.026 ± 0.0030.954
Tcur12780.004 ± 0.0010.020 ± 0.0020.938
Table 2. Weight loss of TPU Elastollan B85A-10 and C85A-10 cubes with an initial weight of approximately 80 mg after hydrolysis by LCC, TfCut2, Tcur0390 and Tcur1278 for 100 h at 60–70 °C. All values were determined at least in triplicate.
Table 2. Weight loss of TPU Elastollan B85A-10 and C85A-10 cubes with an initial weight of approximately 80 mg after hydrolysis by LCC, TfCut2, Tcur0390 and Tcur1278 for 100 h at 60–70 °C. All values were determined at least in triplicate.
EnzymeTemperature (°C)Weight loss (%)
B85A-10C85A-10
LCC601.2 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.2
703.2 ± 0.52.5 ± 0.4
TfCut2601.0 ± 0.11.1 ± 0.2
701.9 ± 0.31.5 ± 0.2
Tcur0390600.3 ± 0.10.4 ± 0.0
Tcur1278600.6 ± 0.10.8 ± 0.1
Table 3. Molecular weights of Elastollan B85A-10 and C85A-10 determined by GPC following hydrolysis by LCC at 70 °C for 200 h and of negative control samples without enzyme. The polydispersity index (PDI) is the quotient of Mw and Mn.
Table 3. Molecular weights of Elastollan B85A-10 and C85A-10 determined by GPC following hydrolysis by LCC at 70 °C for 200 h and of negative control samples without enzyme. The polydispersity index (PDI) is the quotient of Mw and Mn.
ElastollanWeight loss (%)MnMwMpPDI
B85A-100 (negative control)57,355 ± 1284132,425 ± 194897,559 ± 10112.31
4.957,635 ± 891108,873 ± 268877,501 ± 31761.89
C85A-100 (negative control)49,061 ± 1514109,264 ± 102473,335 ± 34262.23
4.149,009 ± 161388,956 ± 153066,288 ± 28461.82

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schmidt, J.; Wei, R.; Oeser, T.; Dedavid e Silva, L.A.; Breite, D.; Schulze, A.; Zimmermann, W. Degradation of Polyester Polyurethane by Bacterial Polyester Hydrolases. Polymers 2017, 9, 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9020065

AMA Style

Schmidt J, Wei R, Oeser T, Dedavid e Silva LA, Breite D, Schulze A, Zimmermann W. Degradation of Polyester Polyurethane by Bacterial Polyester Hydrolases. Polymers. 2017; 9(2):65. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9020065

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schmidt, Juliane, Ren Wei, Thorsten Oeser, Lukas Andre Dedavid e Silva, Daniel Breite, Agnes Schulze, and Wolfgang Zimmermann. 2017. "Degradation of Polyester Polyurethane by Bacterial Polyester Hydrolases" Polymers 9, no. 2: 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9020065

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop