- freely available
Cells 2012, 1(3), 617-630; doi:10.3390/cells1030617
Abstract: Viruses commandeer regulatory pathways of their hosts to optimize their success as cellular parasites. The human tumor viruses, Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), Kaposi’s Sarcoma Herpesvirus (KSHV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) all affect autophagy for their own ends. EBV and KSHV regulate it during latent infections, a phase when no progeny virus is produced, while HBV and HCV use autophagy to promote their productive infections. Here we shall compare and contrast how these human tumor viruses regulate autophagy and what they gain by the appropriation of this cellular pathway.
Autophagy is a cellular program that can be initiated by several stimuli, is carried out by multiple regulatory molecules and enzymes, and culminates in the formation of double-membrane bound vesicles, termed autophagosomes, containing macromolecules which are catabolized in autophagolysosomes upon fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes [1,2]. To initiate autophagy, the phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate kinase, Vps34 (abbreviations can be found in Table 1), must be activated and generate phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate for the growing phagophore, a precursor structure to the autophagosome. The stimuli for autophagy range from nutrient starvation to acute exercise . The autophagic program is controlled by regulators as diverse as mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia/lymphoma 2 (Bcl2)  and the participants in it include kinases, ubiquitin-like conjugating molecules, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases, and transmembrane proteins .
|6TM||6-transmembrane-spanning domain of LMP1|
|AIDS||acute immunodeficiency syndrome|
|ATF||activated transcription factor|
|BALF1||BamHI A leftward fragment 1|
|Bcl2||B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia/lymphoma 2|
|BHRF1||BamHI H rightward fragment 1|
|CD||cluster of differentiation|
|CRE||cAMP responsive element|
|EBNA1||Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1|
|eIF2α||eukaryotic initiation factor 2 alpha|
|HBs||Hepatitis B small surface protein|
|HBV||Hepatitis B Virus|
|HBx||Hepatitis B X protein|
|HCV||Hepatitis C Virus|
|HFFs||human foreskin fibroblasts|
|IRGM||immunity related GTPase M|
|ISG56||interferon-stimulated gene 56|
|KSHV||Kaposi's Sarcoma Herpesvirus|
|LC3||light chain 3|
|LMP1||latent membrane protein 1|
|MAVS||mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein|
|MHC||major histocompatibility complex|
|mTOR||mammalian target of rapamycin|
|NAF1||nutrient-deprivation autophagy factor 1|
|NFkB||nuclear factor kappa B|
|NS4B||non-structural protein 4B|
|PEL||primary effusion lymphoma|
|PERK||protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase|
|RIG-I||retinoic acid inducible gene I protein|
|RTA||replication and transcription activator|
|siRNA||small interfering RNA|
|TNFα||tumor necrosis factor alpha|
|UPR||Unfolded Protein Response|
|v-FLIP||FADD-like interleukin-1 beta-converting enzyme inhibitory protein|
|Vps34||vesicle-mediated vacuolar protein sorting 34|
Viruses are obligate cellular parasites and human tumor viruses, in particular, are obligate cellular parasites that can affect their host cells oncogenically. Viruses need to amplify their numbers to survive and spread. They use the synthetic machinery of their host cells to make more of themselves and these productive cycles often end in cell death and pathology. Human tumor viruses must produce more of themselves, too, but can drive the infected cells both to survive and proliferate aberrantly. Several human tumor viruses make use of autophagy either during their productive cycles, or during non-productive infections, or both (Table 2). Here we review how four human tumor viruses involve autophagy in their life-cycles to foster their own parasitic ends and to induce their pathologies.
|Virus||Role of Autophagy in Viral Life-cycle||References|
|EBV||Autophagy contributes to the generation of epitopes of EBNA1, a pivotal viral protein, presented on MHC II||[5,6]|
|Along with the UPR, autophagy regulates expression of LMP1, a viral oncogene||[7,8]|
|KSHV||Autophagy inhibits survival and proliferation of latently-infected cells Supports viral replication and productive life-cycle||[9,10]|
|HCV||Autophagy blocks an interferon response during the early stages of infection allowing HCV to establish its infection|||
|HBV||Autophagy supports infection and may provide a scaffold for reverse transcription or viral envelopment during the productive life-cycle||[13,14]|
2. Epstein-Barr Virus
Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) is a Herpesvirus, and as with other members of this family, its viral particle is enveloped and contains a double-stranded DNA genome of 165 kbp. EBV infects the vast majority of people in the world without causing disease, but does cause a variety of cancers in a minority of infected people including Burkitt’s lymphoma, Hodgkin’s lymphomas, B-cell post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, Nasopharygeal carcinoma, and gastric carcinoma . Once people are infected, the virus is latently maintained in memory B-cells for the life of the person . There are at least two apparently unrelated ways in which EBV has evolved to use autophagy in its host cell. EBV DNA is maintained as an extrachromosomal plasmid in latently infected cells, including all tumor cells. The virus contributes only one protein, Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1), to the synthesis and maintenance of its plasmid; all other trans-acting factors are provided by the host cell . EBNA1, though, is essential for EBV to be maintained in proliferating cells [18,19].
Surprisingly, the expression of EBNA1 in infected cells does not lead to those cells being recognized efficiently by cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8)-positive cytotoxic T-cells. A stretch of glycine-alanine repeats in this viral protein limits its presentation as an antigen on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules . Rather, EBNA1 stimulates CD4-positive T-cells when presented on infected B-cells by MHC class II molecules [5,21,22]. Some of these epitopes are generated via autophagy, and EBNA1 can be found in double membrane vesicles, consistent with its localization to autophagosomes (Table 2) [6,23,24]. Stimulation of CD4-positive T-cells after their exposure to EBV-positive cells is inhibited when autophagy is suppressed with small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) that target mediators of autophagy, ATG12 or ATG7 (ATG refers to “autophagy related”) [6,23]. Similarly, CD4-positive T-cells remain unstimulated when the acidification of autophagolysosomes in infected cells is inhibited . Despite its immunogenicity, EBNA1 is poorly presented on MHC II molecules, perhaps because it spends little time in the cytoplasm [5,6,25,26]. By disrupting its nuclear localization signal and rendering it cytosolic, Leung and colleagues were able to enhance EBNA1’s degradation in autophagolysosomes and increase the stimulation of CD4-positive T-cell clones by 15-fold . How the presentation of EBNA1 to CD4-positive T-cells contributes to EBV’s life-cycle is unclear. However, its poor presentation by MHC class II molecules surely contributes to some EBV-positive tumors, such as canonical Burkitt’s lymphomas, in which EBNA1 is the only viral protein expressed, escaping the hosts’ immune response.
There is potentially a mechanism by which EBV regulates autophagy to affect the host’s immune response. EBV encodes two proteins, BamHI rightward fragment 1 (BHRF1) and BamHI A leftward fragment 1 (BALF1), which are orthologs of the cellular antiapoptotic protein, Bcl2. These proteins can each inhibit apoptosis and at least one or the other needs to be expressed in newly infected B-lymphocytes for EBV to infect the cells successfully . BHRF1 is expressed in a subset of Burkitt’s lymphomas and helps to block apoptosis in these latently infected tumor cells, too . Bcl2 and its ortholog encoded by KSHV bind Beclin1 and thereby inhibit autophagy . If the EBV-encoded orthologs of Bcl2, BHRF1 and BALF1, bind Beclin1 too, which appears likely, then these EBV proteins will also inhibit autophagy. Their potential inhibition of autophagy would limit further the presentation of EBNA1-derived peptides by MHC class II molecules and simultaneously limit any other contributions to innate immunity mediated through autophagy.
EBV uses autophagy to regulate expression of one of its oncogenes, the latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1), which drives proliferation of infected B-cells (Table 1). LMP1 is expressed in a subset of latent infections and contains two domains that perform independent functions . Its carboxy-terminal domain is a viral mimic of the human CD40 receptor, and activates signaling pathways, such as nuclear factor kappa B (NFkB), to drive cellular proliferation and inhibit apoptosis [7,30,31,32]. This carboxy-terminal signaling requires LMP1 to self-oligomerize, which is accomplished by a second domain, its six-transmembrane spanning domains (6TM) . Recently, it has been shown that a single amino acid within transmembrane domain 5 is necessary for LMP1’s oligomerization . The 6TM of LMP1 dose-dependently induces autophagy via the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) (Table 3) [34,35]. This induction is mediated at least in part by LMP1’s activating protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), a kinase that can phosphorylate eukaryotic initiation factor 2 alpha (eIF2α). These cellular mechanisms are used to regulate LMP1’s own synthesis and degradation, thereby modulating its expression and signaling during infection (Table 2). When levels of LMP1 within B-cells are low, LMP1 promotes its own transcription by activating PERK to phosphorylate eIF2α [34,36]. An activated transcription factor/ cAMP responsive element (ATF/CRE) element in LMP1’s promoter is activated during the UPR, likely via ATF4 whose translation is enhanced by phospho-eIF2α . Translation of LMP1 is mediated by unphosphorylated eIF2α, which makes up the majority of the total eIF2α in these cells . However, as the levels of LMP1 increase, the fraction of eIF2α phosphorylated increases and translation of LMP1 is limited .
|Virus||Viral Protein||Autophagic Protein||Effect of Viral Proteins on Autophagy||References|
|EBV||LMP1||Unknown||Activates autophagy via the UPR||[7,8]|
|KSHV||v-FLIP||ATG3||Competes with LC3 for binding to ATG3, thereby inhibits the conjugation of LC3 to PE|||
|v-Bcl2||Beclin 1||Binds Beclin 1 and inhibits its activation of autophagy||[29,37,38]|
|HCV||NS4B||Vps34||Induces autophagy by stimulating the enzymatic activity of Vps34|||
|NS5B||ATG5||Stimulates conjugation of LC3 to PE|||
|HBV||HBs||Unknown||Activates autophagy via UPR|||
|HBx||Vps34||Initiates autophagy, possibly by the generation of phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate by Vps34|||
To induce its degradation, LMP1 stimulates autophagy via the UPR . LMP1’s activation of PERK likely contributes to the activation of autophagy via PERK’s phosphorylation of eIF2α. The transcription factor, ATF4, which is translated by phospho-eIF2α, can stimulate transcription of genes encoding the autophagic proteins, light chain 3 (LC3) and autophagy-related 5 homolog (ATG5) . LC3 is an ubiquitin-like protein that is conjugated to phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) . LC3 is translated as an inactive protein (Pro-LC3), which is cleaved by the protease, ATG4, to generate cytosolic LC3-I. LC3-I is conjugated to PE (LC3-II) in a reaction requiring the E2-like enzyme, ATG3, and the E3-like complex, ATG16L complex . The lipid-conjugation of LC3 allows LC3’s insertion into the phagophore. Inhibiting autophagy or the acidification of lysosomes blocks LMP1’s degradation, thus increasing its expression in EBV-positive cells [10,34]. Disrupting this complex regulation of expression is deleterious to the cell and inhibits cellular survival and/or proliferation. The levels of LMP1 vary in otherwise genetically identical cells; those expressing intermediate levels of LMP1 proliferate optimally, while those with low or high levels grow more slowly and likely will avoid immune detection [9,36]. A weak immune response will be elicited if too little antigen is expressed. When expressed at high levels, LMP1’s 6TM inhibits proliferation, thereby rendering B-cells resistant to external apoptotic stimuli, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) . This complex regulation of the LMP1 oncogene contributes to EBV’s driving proliferation of both normal and some tumor cells.
3. Kaposi’s Sarcoma Herpesvirus
Kaposi’s Sarcoma Herpes Virus (KSHV) is also a Herpesvirus having an enveloped virus particle encapsidating a double-stranded DNA genome. The prevalence of infection by KSHV varies dramatically in different populations. Between 5%–10% of adult North Americans are infected on average, while up to 65% of isolated groups of indigenous people in Brazil are infected . KSHV causes Kaposi’s Sarcoma, an endothelial cancer associated often with acute immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), and primary effusion lymphomas (PELs), a lymphoma of B-cell origin . Most PEL cells are infected both with KSHV and EBV . PEL cells do not usually express LMP1, and therefore autophagy does not affect expression of this viral oncogene.
KSHV appears to have a love/hate relationship with autophagy. It blocks autophagy during the latent phase of its life-cycle and depends on it during the productive phase of its life-cycle. KSHV encodes FADD-like interleukin-1 beta-converting enzyme inhibitory protein (v-FLIP), which inhibits autophagy . v-FLIP does so by competing with LC3 for binding to ATG3, thereby inhibiting LC3’s conjugation to PE and its insertion into phagophores (Table 3) [4,44]. The effect of v-FLIP on autophagy is at least two-fold (Table 2). First, v-FLIP inhibits autophagic cellular death . Lee and colleagues examined how inhibiting v-FLIP’s binding to ATG3 would affect tumor development by PEL cells grown as xenografts. They developed peptide mimics of the α-2 and α-4 domains of v-FLIP, which compete specifically for v-FLIP’s binding to ATG3, and injected them into mice receiving KSHV-positive xenografts. By competing with v-FLIP, but not LC3, for binding to ATG3, the peptide mimics effectively reduced the size of the tumors . Secondly, v-FLIP’s suppression of autophagy inhibits v-cyclin-induced cellular senescence during viral infection . KSHV’s v-cyclin protein is an oncogenic mimic of the human cyclins that drives the proliferation of infected endothelial cells. When expressed alone in human foreskin fibroblasts (HFFs), v-cyclin induces senescence, but senescence is rarely observed during infection with KSHV . Autophagy appears to contribute to cellular senescence in human fibroblasts, and its inhibition delays senescence in fibroblasts following the induction of the oncogene, Ras . v-FLIP’s suppression of autophagy is both necessary and sufficient to inhibit senescence of KSHV-infected HFFs . Thus, it appears that KSHV inhibits autophagy via v-FLIP and this inhibition contributes to the infected cells’ survival and potentially to its oncogenic progression.
Another means by which KSHV can inhibit autophagy is through its ortholog of Bcl2 which binds Beclin 1 [29,37]. Bcl2 itself binds Beclin 1 only at the endoplasmic reticulum where the nutrient-deprivation autophagy factor 1 (NAF1) is localized [29,46]. NAF1 is a member of the inositol-1,4,5 triphosphate receptor complex and is required for Bcl2 to bind Beclin 1 . In comparison to the human Bcl2, KSHV’s v-Bcl2 binds more strongly to Beclin 1, likely indicating a selection for this interaction in the life-cycle of KSHV . KSHV’s v-Bcl2 is expressed during the productive phase of the viral life cycle and it is not clear what advantage this inhibition provides the virus. Inhibiting autophagy could limit the presentation of antigens on MHC class II molecules and thereby protect infected cells from their immune recognition [21,22]. It is all reasonable to speculate that KSHV’s v-Bcl2 is expressed soon after infection of B-cells or endothelial cells and blocks apoptosis as do the v-Bcl2 orthologs of EBV . All of these viral orthologs may contribute to successful infections by their respective viruses by binding Beclin 1 to regulate autophagy, too.
One reason the role of KSHV’s v-Bcl2 in inhibiting autophagy is uncertain is because the immediate-early transcription factor of KSHV, replication and transcription activator (RTA) stimulates autophagy, which in turn supports the productive phase of viral infection (Table 2, Table 3). The expression of RTA is necessary to induce the productive cycle of KSHV. For example, sodium butyrate stimulates the expression of RTA in latently infected cells and activates a transcriptional cascade of viral genes required for producing infectious virions [38,47]. Independently of KSHV, RTA can induce autophagy in endothelial cells and B-cells by an unknown mechanism . Treating PEL cells with 3-methyl adenine (3-MA), an inhibitor of autophagy, represses expression of viral genes needed for viral replication . KSHV’s productive cycle therefore benefits from autophagy. It is possible, given its inhibition of autophagy, that v-FLIP maintains viral latency, that is, blocks the transition from latent to productive infection via its inhibiting autophagy. KSHV uses autophagy to promote its productive cycle and inhibits it probably to foster its latent infections. Both activities would potentially contribute to the pathogenesis by KSHV.
4. Hepatitis C Virus
Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) causes a large fraction of cases of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the world today with about 200 million people currently being infected . The virus is a member of the Flavivirus family with its particle containing a single, positive-sense RNA genome of close to 10 kb in length . The RNA is translated during infection into a single polypeptide that is subsequently cleaved by cellular and viral proteases into four structural and six non-structural proteins . By “structural” proteins is meant those that make up the virus particle; non-structural proteins are usually enzymes that regulate the viral life-cycle.
HCV infection initiated either by treatment of cells with infectious particles or transfection of viral RNAs into them induces autophagy (Table 2) [48,49]. It has also been found that HCV’s non-structural protein 4B, NS4B, when expressed alone in cells induces autophagy (Table 3) . Multiple studies indicate that the inhibition of this induced autophagy inhibits HCV infection. The inhibition of Beclin 1 and ATG4B with siRNAs in infected Huh7 cells decreases the levels of synthesized viral RNA by 100-fold . Beclin 1 is a major regulator of autophagy and ATG4B cleaves pro-LC3, generating the cytosolic LC3-I protein prior to its conjugation to PE [1,13]. NS5B has been found to bind ATG5 in yeast two-hybrid assays; inhibition of ATG5 with siRNAs in infected Huh7 cells inhibits viral RNA synthesis 10-fold (Table 3) . ATG5 forms a complex with ATG12 and then with ATG16L, which together determine where in phagophores LC3 is conjugated to PE [4,51]. ATG5 interacts with immunity related GTPase M (IRGM) and the inhibition of IRGM with siRNA inhibits HCV infection, too .
The mechanism by which inhibiting autophagy inhibits HCV infection is being elucidated in order to understand what this virus gains by its inducing autophagy. Inhibiting the induction of autophagy prior to infection inhibits viral RNA synthesis, but it does not do so after HCV replication has been initiated . This timing of the importance of autophagy in the HCV life-cycle is consistent with observations indicating that autophagy inhibits an innate immune response to HCV early in the viral life-cycle . These authors found that the inhibition of ATG5 (or of participants in the UPR which foster autophagy) with siRNAs enhanced both transcription of the interferon beta (IFNβ) promoter and of downstream response elements, such as interferon-stimulated gene 56 (ISG56). Their findings are consistent with HCV-induced autophagy limiting the innate immune response of retinoic acid inducible gene I protein (RIG-I) recognizing sequences in HCV’s RNA genome . This inhibition would be required by the virus only early during the course of infection because later in infection a viral protease, NS3/4A, cleaves the cellular protein, mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS), which is required downstream of RIG-I to induce IFNα and β . It now appears that HCV induces autophagy to block an interferon response and allow the early stages of its infection. HCV uses an independent mechanism to block this innate immune response later in its life-cycle. Inhibiting autophagy late in HCV’s life-cycle when it has established a persistent infection is detrimental to the virus because it induces death . It therefore appears that even in persistently infected cells, HCV’s induction of autophagy is advantageous to the virus.
5. Hepatitis B Virus
Three hundred and fifty million people worldwide are infected with Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) despite the availability of a vaccine that prevents infection. HBV causes a large fraction of cases of HCC, as does HCV. HBV is a member of the Hepadnavirus family and its linear, partially double-stranded DNA molecule of 3.2 kb is found in a protein core, which itself is enveloped . The DNA is transcribed into a 3.4 kb pregenomic mRNA during infection, which is encapsidated by the viral core protein and serves as a template for reverse transcription . This large mRNA, as well as smaller ones with the same poly-adenylation site, encodes three envelope surface proteins, a core protein, reverse transcriptase, and the X protein (HBx) . The surface proteins have an identical, four-spanning transmembrane domain and the small surface protein, HBs can self-oligomerize.
Two groups have found that HBV induces autophagy in cells transfected in vitro and in mice transgenic for HBV (Table 2) [55,56,57]. Their combined data support this induction by HBV persuasively [55,56,57]. For example, transfection of cells derived from human liver tumors with HBV DNA induces increased levels of PE-conjugated LC3  and the formation of autophagosomes . These combined studies also show that autophagy fosters HBV’s life-cycle. Inhibiting autophagy with siRNAs to ATG7 inhibits formation of the products of HBV’s reverse transcription  and siRNAs to Beclin 1 inhibit the appearance of viral DNA in extracellular medium . These findings are also supported by an analysis in mice engineered to be null for ATG5 in their livers . The null mice when transgenic for HBV have greatly reduced levels of viral DNA in their sera when compared to their ATG5-positive counterparts . These studies support the ability of HBV to induce autophagy and for the viral life-cycle to be fostered by autophagy. Where they differ is in their notions of the mechanisms of induction and the benefits that subsequently accrue to HBV. One set of experiments indicates that the viral HBx gene is essential for the induction of autophagy (Table 2) ; the other indicates that the HBs gene is sufficient for this induction (Table 2) . One finds that the inhibition of autophagy inhibits reverse transcription within the viral core ; the other that the inhibition of autophagy inhibits viral envelopment . These varied findings cannot be straightforwardly reconciled. It is apparent that expression of HBs in cells does induce the UPR and that the UPR leads to autophagy in these cells . Inhibiting key mediators of the UPR such as PERK or ATF6 with siRNAs does block autophagy in cells transfected with HBs, for example . Perhaps some of the differences noted in the studies reflect differences in the authors’ emphasis more than in their science. HBV likely induces and benefits from autophagy; the specifics of how it does so need elaboration.
Some viruses that interact with the autophagic machinery repress it, thus ensuring their success in infected cells. The four human tumor viruses reviewed here all use—and even stimulate—autophagy for their own benefits (Figure 1). Each virus encodes one or more proteins that regulate the autophagic machinery either directly or indirectly.
All four human tumor viruses induce autophagy, and KSHV also inhibits it. Two of these viruses, HBV and EBV, encode transmembrane proteins—HBs and LMP1, respectively—that localize to the endoplasmic reticulum and induce autophagy via the UPR [35,57]. In its induction of autophagy in EBV-positive B-cells, the viral protein LMP1 autocatalyzes its degradation, thereby likely avoiding immune detection and relieving the cytostasis it causes . How LMP1 and HBs activate the UPR is not known. It is possible that their complex membrane structures are easily misfolded. It is also possible that via their self-oligomerization they are recognized as protein aggregates that require degradation. Evidence consistent with the latter idea comes from models of Parkinson’s disease .
Whereas LMP1’s induction of autophagy may contribute to EBV’s avoidance of immune detection, the EBNA1 protein encoded by EBV can be presented on MHC class II molecules in part by autophagy [6,23]. HCV also uses autophagy to avoid immune detection. During the early stages of infection, NS5B of HCV interacts with ATG5 and stimulates the conjugation of LC3 to PE . Autophagy inhibits the IFN response stimulated by RIG-I when liver cells are infected with HCV [49,53]. Though autophagy’s inhibition of innate immunity is required only for early infection, autophagy appears also to inhibit cellular death during the late stages of HCV’s infection.
Autophagy fosters the productive life-cycles of KSHV, HBV, and HCV; more virions are produced when autophagy is induced by viral proteins [40,48,55,56,57,59]. KSHV can also inhibit autophagy. Its v-FLIP, which is expressed during viral latency, competes with LC3 for binding to ATG3, thereby inhibiting LC3’s lipid-conjugation . In doing so, v-FLIP inhibits cellular death of KSHV-infected PEL cells and HFFs . KSHV’s v-Bcl2 can also inhibit autophagy by binding Beclin1 but the role this inhibition plays in the viral life-cycle is now unknown.
Given its role in the life-cycle of HCV, HBV, KSHV, and EBV, autophagy could be a potential target for anti-viral or tumor therapy. For example, suppressing autophagy would block the production of HBV and HCV virions; it could cause cellular death in EBV- and HCV-positive cells. In contrast, cellular death of KSHV-positive PELs and Kaposi’s Sarcomas could occur when autophagy is induced. Elucidating the roles of autophagy in the life-cycles of human tumor viruses may lead to the identification of targets for new treatments of the many cancers these viruses cause.
This work was supported by grants from the United States National Institutes of Health (NIH, CA70723, CA133027, and CA22443) awarded to B.S. B.S. is an American Cancer Society Research Professor.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Kroemer, G.; Marino, G.; Levine, B. Autophagy and the integrated stress response. Mol. Cell 2010, 40, 280–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, C.; Klionsky, D.J. Regulation mechanisms and signaling pathways of autophagy. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2009, 43, 67–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, C.; Bassik, M.C.; Moresi, V.; Sun, K.; Wei, Y.; Zou, Z.; An, Z.; Loh, J.; Fisher, J.; Sun, Q.; et al. Exercise-induced BCL2-regulated autophagy is required for muscle glucose homeostasis. Nature 2012, 481, 511–515. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Z.; Klionsky, D.J. Mammalian autophagy: Core molecular machinery and signaling regulation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2010, 22, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, H.M.; Haigh, T.A.; Gudgeon, N.H.; Leen, A.M.; Tsang, C.W.; Brooks, J.; Landais, E.; Houssaint, E.; Lee, S.P.; Rickinson, A.B.; et al. CD4+ T-Cell responses to Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) latent-cycle antigens and the recognition of EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 4896–4907. [Google Scholar]
- Leung, C.S.; Haigh, T.A.; Mackay, L.K.; Rickinson, A.B.; Taylor, G.S. Nuclear location of an endogenously expressed antigen, EBNA1, restricts access to macroautophagy and the range of CD4 Epitope display. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 2165–2170. [Google Scholar]
- Dirmeier, U.; Hoffmann, R.; Kilger, E.; Schultheiss, U.; Briseno, C.; Gires, O.; Kieser, A.; Eick, D.; Sugden, B.; Hammerschmidt, W. Latent Membrane Protein 1 of Epstein-Barr Virus coordinately regulates proliferation with control of apoptosis. Oncogene 2005, 24, 1711–1717. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.; Sugden, B. A membrane leucine heptad contributes to trafficking, signaling, and transformation by Latent Membrane Protein 1. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 9121–9130. [Google Scholar]
- Kaykas, A.; Sugden, B. The amino-terminus and membrane-spanning domains of LMP-1 inhibit cell proliferation. Oncogene 2000, 19, 1400–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, D.Y.; Lee, J.; Sugden, B. The unfolded protein response and autophagy: Herpesviruses rule! J. Virol. 2009, 83, 1168–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Young, A.R.; Narita, M.; Ferreira, M.; Kirschner, K.; Sadaie, M.; Darot, J.F.; Tavare, S.; Arakawa, S.; Shimizu, S.; Watt, F.M.; et al. Autophagy mediates the mitotic senescence transition. Genes Dev. 2009, 23, 798–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinha, S.; Colbert, C.L.; Becker, N.; Wei, Y.; Levine, B. Molecular basis of the regulation of Beclin 1-Dependent autophagy by the Gamma-Herpesvirus 68 Bcl-2 homolog M11. Autophagy 2008, 4, 989–997. [Google Scholar]
- Kabeya, Y.; Mizushima, N.; Yamamoto, A.; Oshitani-Okamoto, S.; Ohsumi, Y.; Yoshimori, T. LC3, GABARAP and GATE16 localize to autophagosomal membrane depending on form-II formation. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117, 2805–2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gregoire, I.P.; Richetta, C.; Meyniel-Schicklin, L.; Borel, S.; Pradezynski, F.; Diaz, O.; Deloire, A.; Azocar, O.; Baguet, J.; Le Breton, M.; et al. IRGM is a common target of RNA viruses that subvert the autophagy network. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002422. [Google Scholar]
- Dar, W.A.; Sugden, B. Epstein-Barr Virus as a Pathogen. In Viral Oncology: Basic Science and Clinical Applications; Khalili, K., Jeang, K.T., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. 425–451. [Google Scholar]
- Babcock, G.J.; Decker, L.L.; Volk, M.; Thorley-Lawson, D.A. EBV persistence in memory B cells in vivo. Immunity 1998, 9, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nanbo, A.; Sugden, A.; Sugden, B. The Coupling of Synthesis and partitioning of EBV’s plasmid replicon is revealed in live cells. EMBO J. 2007, 26, 4252–4262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vereide, D.; Sugden, B. Proof for EBV’s sustaining role in Burkitt’s lymphomas. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2009, 19, 389–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vereide, D.; Sugden, B. Lymphomas depend on EBV in proportion to their expression of viral genes. Blood 2011, 117, 1977–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levitskaya, J.; Coram, M.; Levitsky, V.; Imreh, S.; Steigerwald-Mullen, P.M.; Klein, G.; Kurilla, M.G.; Masucci, M.G. Inhibition of antigen processing by the internal repeat region of the Epstein-Barr Virus nuclear Antigen-1. Nature 1995, 375, 685–688. [Google Scholar]
- Leen, A.; Meij, P.; Redchenko, I.; Middeldorp, J.; Bloemena, E.; Rickinson, A.; Blake, N. Differential immunogenicity of Epstein-Barr Virus latent-cycle proteins for human CD4(+) T-Helper 1 responses. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 8649–8659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munz, C.; Bickham, K.L.; Subklewe, M.; Tsang, M.L.; Chahroudi, A.; Kurilla, M.G.; Zhang, D.; O’Donnell, M.; Steinman, R.M. Human CD4(+) T lymphocytes consistently respond to the latent Epstein-Barr Virus nuclear Antigen EBNA1. J. Exp. Med. 2000, 191, 1649–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paludan, C.; Schmid, D.; Landthaler, M.; Vockerodt, M.; Kube, D.; Tuschl, T.; Munz, C. Endogenous MHC class II processing of a viral nuclear antigen after autophagy. Science 2005, 307, 593–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nimmerjahn, F.; Milosevic, S.; Behrends, U.; Jaffee, E.M.; Pardoll, D.M.; Bornkamm, G.W.; Mautner, J. Major histocompatibility complex class II-restricted presentation of a cytosolic antigen by autophagy. Eur. J. Immunol. 2003, 33, 1250–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mautner, J.; Pich, D.; Nimmerjahn, F.; Milosevic, S.; Adhikary, D.; Christoph, H.; Witter, K.; Bornkamm, G.W.; Hammerschmidt, W.; Behrends, U. Epstein-Barr Virus nuclear Antigen 1 evades direct immune recognition by CD4+ T helper cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2004, 34, 2500–2509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paludan, C.; Bickham, K.; Nikiforow, S.; Tsang, M.L.; Goodman, K.; Hanekom, W.A.; Fonteneau, J.F.; Stevanovic, S.; Munz, C. Epstein-Barr nuclear Antigen 1-Specific CD4(+) Th1 cells kill Burkitt’s lymphoma cells. J. Immunol. 2002, 169, 1593–1603. [Google Scholar]
- Altmann, M.; Hammerschmidt, W. Epstein-Barr Virus provides a new paradigm: A requirement for the immediate inhibition of apoptosis. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3, e404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelly, G.L.; Long, H.M.; Stylianou, J.; Thomas, W.A.; Leese, A.; Bell, A.I.; Bornkamm, G.W.; Mautner, J.; Rickinson, A.B.; Rowe, M. An Epstein-Barr Virus anti-apoptotic protein constitutively expressed in transformed cells and implicated in burkitt lymphomagenesis: The Wp/BHRF1 link. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5, e1000341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pattingre, S.; Tassa, A.; Qu, X.; Garuti, R.; Liang, X.H.; Mizushima, N.; Packer, M.; Schneider, M.D.; Levine, B. Bcl-2 antiapoptotic proteins inhibit beclin 1-Dependent autophagy. Cell 2005, 122, 927–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graham, J.P.; Arcipowski, K.M.; Bishop, G.A. Differential B-Lymphocyte regulation by CD40 and its viral mimic, Latent Membrane Protein 1. Immunol. Rev. 2010, 237, 226–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zimber-Strobl, U.; Kempkes, B.; Marschall, G.; Zeidler, R.; van Kooten, C.; Banchereau, J.; Bornkamm, G.W.; Hammerschmidt, W. Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein (LMP1) is not sufficient to maintain proliferation of B cells but both it and activated CD40 can prolong their survival. EMBO J. 1996, 15, 7070–7078. [Google Scholar]
- Rastelli, J.; Homig-Holzel, C.; Seagal, J.; Muller, W.; Hermann, A.C.; Rajewsky, K.; Zimber-Strobl, U. LMP1 signaling can replace CD40 signaling in B cells in vivo and has unique features of inducing class-switch recombination to IgG1. Blood 2008, 111, 1448–1455. [Google Scholar]
- Sammond, D.W.; Joce, C.; Takeshita, R.; McQuate, S.E.; Ghosh, N.; Martin, J.M.; Yin, H. Transmembrane peptides used to investigate the homo-oligomeric interface and binding hotspot of Latent Membrane Protein 1. Biopolymers 2011, 95, 772–784. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, D.Y.; Sugden, B. The Latent Membrane Protein 1 oncogene modifies B-Cell physiology by regulating autophagy. Oncogene 2008, 27, 2833–2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, D.Y.; Sugden, B. The LMP1 oncogene of EBV activates PERK and the unfolded protein response to drive its own synthesis. Blood 2008, 111, 2280–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lam, N.; Sandberg, M.L.; Sugden, B. High physiological levels of LMP1 result in phosphorylation of eIF2 Alpha in Epstein-Barr Virus-infected cells. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 1657–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, C.Y.; E, X.F.; Jung, J.U. Downregulation of autophagy by herpesvirus Bcl-2 homologs. Autophagy 2008, 4, 268–272. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, R.; Lin, S.F.; Gradoville, L.; Yuan, Y.; Zhu, F.; Miller, G. A viral gene that activates lytic cycle expression of Kaposi’s Sarcoma-associated herpesvirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 10866–10871. [Google Scholar]
- Su, W.C.; Chao, T.C.; Huang, Y.L.; Weng, S.C.; Jeng, K.S.; Lai, M.M. Rab5 and class III phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Vps34 are involved in Hepatitis C Virus NS4B-induced autophagy. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 10561–10571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, H.J.; Yang, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Wood, C. Enhancement of autophagy during lytic replication by the Kaposi’s Sarcoma-associated herpesvirus replication and transcription activator. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 7448–7458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saito, T.; Owen, D.M.; Jiang, F.; Marcotrigiano, J.; Gale, M., Jr. Innate immunity induced by composition-dependent RIG-I recognition of Hepatitis C Virus RNA. Nature 2008, 454, 523–527. [Google Scholar]
- Rouschop, K.M.; van den Beucken, T.; Dubois, L.; Niessen, H.; Bussink, J.; Savelkouls, K.; Keulers, T.; Mujcic, H.; Landuyt, W.; Voncken, J.W.; et al. The unfolded protein response protects human tumor cells during hypoxia through regulation of the autophagy genes MAP1LC3B and ATG5. J. Clin. Invest. 2010, 120, 127–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, J.N. The Epidemiology of KSHV and its Association with Malignant Disease. In Human Herpesviruses: Biology, Therapy, and Immunoprophylaxis; Arvin, A., Campadelli-Fiume, G., Mocarski, E., Moore, P.S., Roizman, B., Whitley, R., Yamanishi, K., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.S.; Li, Q.; Lee, J.Y.; Lee, S.H.; Jeong, J.H.; Lee, H.R.; Chang, H.; Zhou, F.C.; Gao, S.J.; Liang, C.; et al. FLIP-mediated autophagy regulation in cell death control. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11, 1355–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leidal, A.M.; Cyr, D.P.; Hill, R.J.; Lee, P.W.; McCormick, C. Subversion of autophagy by kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus impairs oncogene-induced senescence. Cell. Host Microbe 2012, 11, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, N.C.; Nguyen, M.; Germain, M.; Shore, G.C. Antagonism of Beclin 1-dependent autophagy by BCL-2 at the endoplasmic reticulum requires NAF-1. EMBO J. 2010, 29, 606–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guito, J.; Lukac, D.M. KSHV Rta promoter specification and viral reactivation. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 30. [Google Scholar]
- Dreux, M.; Gastaminza, P.; Wieland, S.F.; Chisari, F.V. The autophagy machinery is required to initiate Hepatitis C virus replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 14046–14051. [Google Scholar]
- Ke, P.Y.; Chen, S.S. Activation of the unfolded protein response and autophagy after Hepatitis C virus infection suppresses innate antiviral immunity in vitro. J. Clin. Invest. 2011, 121, 37–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guevin, C.; Manna, D.; Belanger, C.; Konan, K.V.; Mak, P.; Labonte, P. Autophagy protein ATG5 interacts transiently with the Hepatitis C Virus RNA Polymerase (NS5B) early during infection. Virology 2010, 405, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fujita, N.; Itoh, T.; Omori, H.; Fukuda, M.; Noda, T.; Yoshimori, T. The Atg16L complex specifies the site of LC3 lipidation for membrane biogenesis in autophagy. Mol. Biol. Cell 2008, 19, 2092–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.D.; Chiu, Y.H.; Ismail, A.S.; Behrendt, C.L.; Wight-Carter, M.; Hooper, L.V.; Chen, Z.J. Mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS) monitors commensal bacteria and induces an immune response that prevents experimental colitis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 17390–17395. [Google Scholar]
- Taguwa, S.; Kambara, H.; Fujita, N.; Noda, T.; Yoshimori, T.; Koike, K.; Moriishi, K.; Matsuura, Y. Dysfunction of autophagy participates in vacuole formation and cell death in cells replicating Hepatitis C Virus. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 13185–13194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schadler, S.; Hildt, E. HBV life cycle: Entry and morphogenesis. Viruses 2009, 1, 185–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sir, D.; Tian, Y.; Chen, W.L.; Ann, D.K.; Yen, T.S.; Ou, J.H. The early autophagic pathway is activated by Hepatitis B Virus and required for viral DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 4383–4388. [Google Scholar]
- Tian, Y.; Sir, D.; Kuo, C.F.; Ann, D.K.; Ou, J.H. Autophagy required for Hepatitis B Virus replication in transgenic mice. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 13453–13456. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Liu, K.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Ding, H.; Yuan, Z. Subversion of cellular autophagy machinery by Hepatitis B Virus for viral envelopment. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 6319–6333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doyle, K.M.; Kennedy, D.; Gorman, A.M.; Gupta, S.; Healy, S.J.; Samali, A. Unfolded proteins and endoplasmic reticulum stress in neurodegenerative disorders. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2011, 15, 2025–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dreux, M.; Chisari, F.V. Impact of the autophagy machinery on Hepatitis C Virus infection. Viruses 2011, 3, 1342–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).