Next Article in Journal
Role of Polycomb Group Protein Cbx2/M33 in Meiosis Onset and Maintenance of Chromosome Stability in the Mammalian Germline
Next Article in Special Issue
Gene Duplication and Ectopic Gene Conversion in Drosophila
Previous Article in Journal
An Exceptional Gene: Evolution of the TSPY Gene Family in Humans and Other Great Apes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gene Conversion in Angiosperm Genomes with an Emphasis on Genes Duplicated by Polyploidization
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 2
Issue 1
10.3390/genes2010048
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Genetic Diversification by Somatic Gene Conversion

by
Kohei Kurosawa
and
Kunihiro Ohta
*
Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Komaba 3-8-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2011, 2(1), 48-58; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes2010048
Submission received: 21 October 2010 / Revised: 14 December 2010 / Accepted: 15 December 2010 / Published: 10 January 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gene Conversion in Duplicated Genes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

: Gene conversion is a type of homologous recombination that leads to transfer of genetic information among homologous DNA sequences. It can be categorized into two classes: homogenizing and diversifying gene conversions. The former class results in neutralization and homogenization of any sequence variation among repetitive DNA sequences, and thus is important for concerted evolution. On the other hand, the latter functions to increase genetic diversity at the recombination-recipient loci. Thus, these two types of gene conversion play opposite roles in genome dynamics. Diversifying gene conversion is observed in the immunoglobulin (Ig) loci of chicken, rabbit, and other animals, and directs the diversification of Ig variable segments and acquisition of functional Ig repertoires. This type of gene conversion is initiated by the biased occurrence of recombination initiation events (e.g., DNA single- or double-strand breaks) on the recipient DNA site followed by unidirectional homologous recombination from multiple template sequences. Transcription and DNA accessibility is also important in the regulation of biased recombination initiation. In this review, we will discuss the biological significance and possible mechanisms of diversifying gene conversion in somatic cells of eukaryotes.

1. What Is “Gene Conversion”?

Genetic rearrangements play pivotal roles not only in promoting genetic diversity, but also in maintaining genetic integrity. When lesions are introduced into the genomic DNA of somatic cells, DNA breaks must be repaired promptly to prevent chromosomal aberrations or cell death. DNA homologous recombination is an essential process involved in DNA repair, particularly of DNA-double strand breaks (DSBs).

There are two major types of homologous recombination: gene conversion (non-crossover) and crossover recombination. The former type results in “copy and paste” type non-reciprocal transfer of genetic information, whereas the latter leads to reciprocal exchange between two homologous chromosomes. Gene conversion is mainly triggered by DSB formation, followed by the generation of single-stranded DNA tails with free 3′ ends. These 3′-end DNA tails then invade an intact homologous DNA duplex (Figure 1). The invading single-strand end forms a heteroduplex with a sequence of homologous DNA within the duplex, and further primes DNA replication using unbroken DNA as a template. The newly synthesized DNA end eventually rehybridizes with the original broken DNA molecule by Watson-Crick base pair interaction. This process is called “synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA)” mechanism [1–3] (Figure 1). On the other hand, crossover products, often found in meiotic homologous recombination, are generated via relatively stable and differentiated intermediates displaying double Holliday junctions (DSB repair mechanism) [4].

In somatic cells, gene conversion is assumed to occupy a position in the major homologous recombination pathway, since the induction of a targeted DSB in Chinese hamster ovary cells by the I-SceI endonuclease mainly enhances localized gene conversion events (97%) but not reciprocal recombination [5]. Gene conversion often accompanies unidirectional “copy and paste” type transfer of genetic information between two homologous DNA sequences, which can either be on different chromosomes or on the same chromatid. Because of this, interlocus gene conversion is thought to have the potential to cause genetic diseases [6]. In addition, interallelic gene conversion may sometimes accompany “loss of heterozygosity”, which is one of the major causes of cancer development. Furthermore, gene conversion is pivotal in the “concerted evolution” of duplicated genes, a case in which the sequence variation between duplicated DNA sequences remains low [7–14].

As seen in Figure 1, gene conversion is basically initiated by the DSB formation at the recombination-recipient sites. The DSB ends are processed to have single stranded DNA tails, one of which eventually invades into the duplex of unbroken DNA. The invaded single strand DNA tail then forms a heteroduplex with the homologous DNA stretch in the unbroken template strand. The free DNA end of this heteroduplex primes a repair DNA synthesis. After a strand extension, the newly synthesized strand dissociates form the unbroken template DNA and anneals with the original broken DNA. Finally, the single strand DNA gap is filled followed by a ligation of DNA nicks. In this process, the DNA sequence on the unbroken DNA strand is converted to the broken strand, thereby accompanying a unidirectional transfer of genetic information.

Genes 02 00048f1 1024
Figure 1. Gene conversion by the Synthesis-Dependent Strand Annealing (SDSA) mechanism.
Figure 1. Gene conversion by the Synthesis-Dependent Strand Annealing (SDSA) mechanism.
Genes 02 00048f1 1024

2. Diversifying Gene Conversion in Chicken B Cells

Gene conversion tends to negate sequence variation among duplicated genes or DNA sequences; hence, it is important for the concerted evolution of duplicated genes. However, a class of gene conversion functions to increase genetic diversity at regions of frequent recombination. Such gene conversion is observed in the immunoglobulin (Ig) loci of chicken, rabbit, and other large farm animals [15–18] (Figure 2). The differentiated B cells in those organisms essentially rely on somatic gene conversion to generate Ig diversity, especially in the hyper-variable region [19,20]. The resulting sequence divergence ensures the generation of a wide range of functional Ig repertoires.

In the chicken pre-B cell line DT40 [21], Ig light chain (IgL) and heavy chain (IgH) contain only a single functional V-J segment in one allele. Successive rounds of templated and unidirectional transfer of short DNA stretches are introduced from the upstream pseudo-V segment clusters to the functional V region, leading to an increase in the sequence divergence of Ig V segments [21]. Therefore, the upstream pseudogene cluster functions only as a “template” for gene conversion, and the original copy remains unaltered [22]. Interestingly, in the absence of pseudogene templates, gene conversion can no longer take place. Elimination of the IgL upstream pseudogene array hampered gene conversion at the IgL V region, but enhanced somatic hypermutation [23]. Therefore, the presence of multiple and different template sequences is critical for the diversifying gene conversion.

Some pathogenic microorganisms, such as the spirochete Borrelin hermsii and African trypanosomes, have similar types of gene conversion-based diversification for genes encoding outer membrane proteins. The Borrelin variable major protein and the Trypanosoma variant surface glycoprotein genes are generated by gene conversion processes from donor pseudogenes [24,25]. Genetic alterations based on gene conversion allow such organisms to evade the immune system of their hosts.

Genes 02 00048f2 1024
Figure 2. Organization of the chicken immunoglobulin light chain (IgL) locus. The germ line chicken IgL locus consists of a tandem array of pseudo V segments (ψV1–25), Vλ, an intervening sequence with joining signals (open triangles) and a transcription silencer, J and C elements. After V(D)J recombination, a unique functional VλJ segment is generated. The V region in this segment functions as a recipient of successive templated gene conversions from the upstream pseudo V segments, thereby the DNA sequence in the V region is diversified.
Figure 2. Organization of the chicken immunoglobulin light chain (IgL) locus. The germ line chicken IgL locus consists of a tandem array of pseudo V segments (ψV1–25), Vλ, an intervening sequence with joining signals (open triangles) and a transcription silencer, J and C elements. After V(D)J recombination, a unique functional VλJ segment is generated. The V region in this segment functions as a recipient of successive templated gene conversions from the upstream pseudo V segments, thereby the DNA sequence in the V region is diversified.
Genes 02 00048f2 1024

3. DNA Modifying and Recombination Enzymes Involved in Ig Gene Conversion

The Ig gene conversion process involves functions of various DNA-related enzymes including activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) [26,27] and Rad51 paralogs (Rad51B, Rad51C, Rad51D, XRCC2, XRCC3) [28], as described below.

AID was identified as an RNA-editing enzyme, based on its similarity to the RNA-editing enzyme APOBEC-1 [29]. AID was first shown to be essential for class-switch recombination and somatic hypermutation (mutations specifically introduced in hypervariable regions of Ig loci) in mice and human [29,30]. Thus, AID is responsible for no less than three different types of DNA diversifying events in Ig loci. Indeed, deletion of the AID gene in B cells conferred loss of gene conversion, class-switch recombination, and somatic hypermutation.

AID is a cytidine deaminase that converts cytidines to uracils [31,32]. Such uracils are supposed to be eliminated by uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG), thereby causing DNA lesions that may initiate homologous recombination. In fact, introduction of the UNG inhibitor (UGI) coding sequence into DT40 cells led to a reduction of gene conversion frequency [33]. The same group later confirmed that DNA single- or double-strand breaks induced at AID-dependant uracils are involved in gene conversion [34]. These observations were supported by the fact that deletion of the UNG gene in DT40 markedly reduced gene conversion rates [35]. Interestingly, transgenic mice constitutively expressing AID tend to generate cancers in various tissues [36]. In addition, the infection of Helicobacter pylori affects genome integrity of gastric cells due to an increased expression of AID, which leads to the accumulation of mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene [37]. Upregulation of AID was observed in gastritis with H. pylori infection and gastric cancer tissues [37].

Rad51 paralogs are important for DNA homology search and the formation of heteroduplexes, which are essential intermediates for gene conversion between the donor and recipient DNA molecules [38]. Somatic hypermutation is relatively rare at Ig loci in DT40, as compared to gene conversion. However, in the absence of Rad51 paralogs, Ig gene conversion is abolished in chicken DT40 cells [28] and somatic hypermutation is, in turn, highly enhanced. As mentioned previously, a similar shift from gene conversion to hypermutation was observed at the IgL V region in DT40 where the IgL upstream pseudogene templates were eliminated [23]. In the absence of the template pseudogenes, gene conversion can no longer take place, and in turn, hypermutation becomes activated. This is because AID is involved in the initiation steps of both gene conversion and hypermutation. These two diversification pathways may differentiate in the subsequent DNA damage repair steps.

4. Possible Mechanisms for Donor/Recipient Choice of Gene Conversion

Targeting of AID to the Ig variable segments should be critical for establishment of the recipient choice for Ig gene conversion. Precisely how AID is targeted to Ig loci remains an open question, but we would like to speculate based on present observations.

Firstly, sequence-specific DNA binding proteins may be responsible for the specific recruitment of AID to the variable regions. Indeed, E2A and NF-kappaB family transcription factors are notably involved in Ig gene conversion [39–43]. Though transcription factors may be mainly involved in chromatin modifications, this raises the possibility that cis-acting elements for gene conversion and hypermutation may be present at Ig loci or in their close proximity. In fact, deleting the genomic DNA sequence including the flanking region of IgL locus in DT40 abolished both gene conversion and hypermutation of the IgL gene [44]. Step-wise deletions of the IgL locus revealed that a 9.8 kilobase flanking DNA sequence located downstream of the IgL transcription start site is necessary for the hypermutation activity [45]. This sequence, called “cis-acting diversification activator” (DIVAC), is sufficient for AID-mediated hypermutation, since its insertion to non-Ig loci predispose neighboring transcription units to hypermutation.

Secondly, transcriptional activity in the Ig allele is involved in the loading of AID. Each of the IgL and IgH alleles in chicken B cells has two homologous (paternal and maternal) copies. Only one of them is recombined by V(D)J recombination, which leads to the elimination of the transcriptional silencer sequence. These transcription-active alleles, unlike non-transcribed alleles, can function as the recipients of gene conversion. This suggests a link between transcription and gene conversion mediated by AID. Recent in vitro experiments revealed that AID is efficiently targeted to relaxed or single-stranded DNA regions in nucleosomes only during transcription [46]. Thus, transcription along the active V regions may facilitate the recruitment of AID. However, transcription per se is a genome-wide event and not restricted to the active V regions. Therefore, the site of AID loading may be determined by the combination of transcription, DNA accessibility, and other factors.

5. Chromatin and Epigenetic Control of Gene Conversion

It has been suggested that local chromatin structure and epigenetic marks play pivotal roles in the regulation of the Ig gene conversion. Histone acetylation, in particular, has been demonstrated to regulate somatic recombination of Ig and T-cell receptor loci such as V(D)J recombination [47–49] and class-switch recombination [50,51] in the immune system of vertebrates. Importantly, the Ig V regions in the recombination-active allele exhibited higher histone acetylation levels, when compared to the recombination in inactive alleles [52]. Additionally, gene conversion frequency increased when chicken DT40 cell lines were treated with trichostatin A (TSA), an inhibitor for one of the histone deacetylases (HDACs) [52]. Similar results were obtained by knocking out the native HDAC1 and HDAC2 genes in DT40 [53,54]. It should be noted that the HDAC2 knockout cells exhibit a rather broader distribution of gene conversion with relatively shorter tracts. Thus, histone modification may regulate the length and position of DNA sequence alterations.

The Ig pseudogene array in DT40 is also characterized by higher levels of histone modifications associated with active chromatin. Artificial tethering of a heterochromatin protein HP1-lactose repressor to lactose operators integrated in the pseudo-V array diminished histone acetylation within the pseudo-V region, leading to repression of gene conversion but enhancement of hypermutation [55]. These results suggest that unidirectional Ig gene conversion requires an open chromatin state in both donor pseudogenes and recipient V regions.

6. Control of DNA Sequence Diversity by Gene Conversion

Convergent gene conversion from multiple different template sequences to a single recipient locus contributes to genetic divergence at the recipient allele (Figure 3). On the other hand, gene conversion from a single template to multiple (or single) recipient loci tends to diminish sequence variation among homologous DNA sequences. Hence, regulation of the donor/recipient choice may be critical for the function of gene conversion in diversification and neutralization of homologous DNA sequences. As observed in chicken Ig loci, targeted delivery of the proteins responsible for DNA lesions locally triggers homologous recombination at the recipient loci. On the one hand, introduction of artificial DNA breaks by tethering the I-SceI endonuclease to a chromosomal LINE repetitive element resulted in DSB repair by gene conversion with various endogenous L1 elements, especially with some of the most active retrotransposable elements [56]. In these cases, gene conversion works towards the diversification of genome sequences. On the other hand, in the budding yeast mating type switching, HO-endonuclease introduces a DSB at the recipient MAT locus, leading to “copy and paste” type transfer of genetic information from the template alleles HML or HMR. In this case, gene conversion functions to neutralize the sequence difference between the recipient and donor loci. Thus, the number of donor sequences and selection of the recipient loci govern the functions of gene conversion in genome dynamics.

Genes 02 00048f3 1024
Figure 3. Regulation of genome alteration and integrity by gene conversion. The donor/recipient choice for gene conversion among homologous DNA sequences is determined by the localization of recombination-initiating DNA lesions, which are introduced under the influence of epigenetic marks such as histone acetylation, local chromatin structure, and transcriptional activity (shown as broken wavy lines). Gene conversion with a single template sequence neutralizes the divergence of the homologous DNA sequences. Adversely, the convergent gene conversion from multiple different DNA sequences results in diversification of the recipient locus.
Figure 3. Regulation of genome alteration and integrity by gene conversion. The donor/recipient choice for gene conversion among homologous DNA sequences is determined by the localization of recombination-initiating DNA lesions, which are introduced under the influence of epigenetic marks such as histone acetylation, local chromatin structure, and transcriptional activity (shown as broken wavy lines). Gene conversion with a single template sequence neutralizes the divergence of the homologous DNA sequences. Adversely, the convergent gene conversion from multiple different DNA sequences results in diversification of the recipient locus.
Genes 02 00048f3 1024

What are the major determinants for the donor/recipient choice? In eukaryotes, homologous recombination control depends on the local chromatin structure. Therefore, chromatin is supposed to be a primary determinant in the donor/recipient choice of gene conversion. Importantly, epigenetic marks on chromatin, which are known to regulate local DNA accessibility, are established during differentiation, or under the influence of extracellular signals. Therefore, it is speculated that eukaryotic cells may utilize chromatin structure as an intrinsic modulator for genome maintenance and rearrangement, in response to a given environment. Moreover, transcriptional activity is often coupled with high DNA accessibility. Differences in transcriptional activities between duplicated or repetitive genes may influence the donor/recipient choice of gene conversion: increased transcription can result in a higher likelihood for a sequence to become a recipient of gene conversion. If so, duplicated genes with high levels of expression can undergo persistent diversification or neutralization by gene conversion, whereas transcriptionally silent loci would lose their ability to diversify DNA sequences at least as recipients of gene conversion. The relationship between chromatin structure and gene conversion requires further investigation, and may provide important clues to understand the regulation of genome evolution.

Acknowledgments

We thank H. Seo and S. Hashimoto of Chiome Bioscience Inc. and all the members of Ohta laboratory, especially Jopsephine Galipon and Lin Waka, for their helpful support. This work was supported by grants from REDS (Rational Evolutionary Design of Biomolecules, Saitama), the Novartis Research Fund, the Sekisui Chemical Research Fund, and the Uehara Memorial Foundation Research Grant.

References

  1. Paques, F.; Haber, J.E. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1999, 63, 349–404. [Google Scholar]
  2. Allers, T.; Lichten, M. Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell 2001, 106, 47–57. [Google Scholar]
  3. Allers, T.; Lichten, M. Intermediates of yeast meiotic recombination contain heteroduplex DNA. Mol. Cell 2001, 8, 225–231. [Google Scholar]
  4. Szostak, J.W.; Orr-Weaver, T.L.; Rothstein, R.J.; Stahl, F.W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell 1983, 33, 25–35. [Google Scholar]
  5. Taghian, D.G.; Nickoloff, J.A. Chromosomal double-strand breaks induce gene conversion at high frequency in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997, 17, 6386–6393. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, J.M.; Cooper, D.N.; Chuzhanova, N.; Ferec, C.; Patrinos, G.P. Gene conversion: mechanisms, evolution and human disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8, 762–775. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ohta, T. Evolution and Variation of Multigene Families; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 1980; pp. 122–129. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zimmer, E.A.; Martin, S.L.; Beverley, S.M.; Kan, Y.W.; Wilson, A.C. Rapid duplication and loss of genes coding for the alpha chains of hemoglobin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1980, 77, 2158–2162. [Google Scholar]
  9. Li, W.H. Rate of gene silencing at duplicate loci: a theoretical study and interpretation of data from tetraploid fishes. Genetics 1980, 95, 237–258. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dover, G. Molecular drive: a cohesive mode of species evolution. Nature 1982, 299, 111–117. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nagylaki, T.; Petes, T.D. Intrachromosomal gene conversion and the maintenance of sequence homogeneity among repeated genes. Genetics 1982, 100, 315–37. [Google Scholar]
  12. Nagylaki, T. Evolution of a finite population under gene conversion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1983, 80, 6278–6281. [Google Scholar]
  13. Innan, H. A method for estimating the mutation, gene conversion and recombination parameters in small multigene families. Genetics 2002, 161, 865–872. [Google Scholar]
  14. Takuno, S.; Nishio, T.; Satta, Y.; Innan, H. Preservation of a pseudogene by gene conversion and diversifying selection. Genetics 2008, 180, 517–531. [Google Scholar]
  15. Reynaud, C.A.; Bertocci, B.; Dahan, A.; Weill, J.C. Formation of the chicken B-cell repertoire: ontogenesis, regulation of Ig gene rearrangement, and diversification by gene conversion. Adv. Immunol. 1994, 57, 353–378. [Google Scholar]
  16. Knight, K.L.; Crane, M.A. Generating the antibody repertoire in rabbit. Adv. Immunol. 1994, 56, 179–218. [Google Scholar]
  17. Butler, J.E.; Sun, J.; Kacskovics, I.; Brown, W.R.; Navarro, P. The VH and CH immunoglobulin genes of swine: implications for repertoire development. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1996, 54, 7–17. [Google Scholar]
  18. Butler, J.E. Immunoglobulin diversity, B-cell and antibody repertoire development in large farm animals. Rev. Sci. Tech. 1998, 17, 43–70. [Google Scholar]
  19. Weill, J.C.; Reynaud, C.A. Rearrangement/hypermutation/gene conversion: when, where and why? Immunol. Today 1996, 17, 92–97. [Google Scholar]
  20. Buerstedde, J.M.; Arakawa, H. Immunoglobulin gene conversion or hypermutation: That's the question. Subcell. Biochem. 2006, 40, 11–24. [Google Scholar]
  21. Buerstedde, J.M.; Reynaud, C.A.; Humphries, E.H.; Olson, W.; Ewert, D.L.; Weill, J.C. Light chain gene conversion continues at high rate in an ALV-induced cell line. EMBO J. 1990, 9, 921–927. [Google Scholar]
  22. Thompson, C.B.; Neiman, P.E. Somatic diversification of the chicken immunoglobulin light chain gene is limited to the rearranged variable gene segment. Cell 1987, 48, 369–378. [Google Scholar]
  23. Arakawa, H.; Saribasak, H.; Buerstedde, J.M. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase initiates immunoglobulin gene conversion and hypermutation by a common intermediate. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2, E179. [Google Scholar]
  24. Restrepo, B.I.; Barbour, A.G. Antigen diversity in the bacterium B. hermsii through “somatic” mutations in rearranged vmp genes. Cell 1994, 78, 867–876. [Google Scholar]
  25. Morrison, L.J.; Marcello, L.; McCulloch, R. Antigenic variation in the African trypanosome: molecular mechanisms and phenotypic complexity. Cell Microbiol. 2009, 11, 1724–1734. [Google Scholar]
  26. Arakawa, H.; Hauschild, J.; Buerstedde, J.M. Requirement of the activation-induced deaminase (AID) gene for immunoglobulin gene conversion. Science 2002, 295, 1301–1306. [Google Scholar]
  27. Harris, R.S.; Sale, J.E.; Petersen-Mahrt, S.K.; Neuberger, M.S. AID is essential for immunoglobulin V gene conversion in a cultured B cell line. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12, 435–438. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sale, J.E.; Calandrini, D.M.; Takata, M.; Takeda, S.; Neuberger, M.S. Ablation of XRCC2/3 transforms immunoglobulin V gene conversion into somatic hypermutation. Nature 2001, 412, 921–926. [Google Scholar]
  29. Muramatsu, M.; Kinoshita, K.; Fagarasan, S.; Yamada, S.; Shinkai, Y.; Honjo, T. Class switch recombination and hypermutation require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell 2000, 102, 553–563. [Google Scholar]
  30. Revy, P.; Muto, T.; Levy, Y.; Geissmann, F.; Plebani, A.; Sanal, O.; Catalan, N.; Forveille, M.; Dufourcq-Labelouse, R.; Gennery, A.; Tezcan, I.; Ersoy, F.; Kayserili, H.; Ugazio, A.G.; Brousse, N.; Muramatsu, M.; Notarangelo, L.D.; Kinoshita, K.; Honjo, T.; Fischer, A.; Durandy, A. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) deficiency causes the autosomal recessive form of the Hyper-IgM syndrome (HIGM2). Cell 2000, 102, 565–575. [Google Scholar]
  31. Petersen-Mahrt, S.K.; Harris, R.S.; Neuberger, M.S. AID mutates E. coli suggesting a DNA deamination mechanism for antibody diversification. Nature 2002, 418, 99–103. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bransteitter, R.; Pham, P.; Scharff, M.D.; Goodman, M.F. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase deaminates deoxycytidine on single-stranded DNA but requires the action of RNase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 4102–4107. [Google Scholar]
  33. Di Noia, J.; Neuberger, M.S. Altering the pathway of immunoglobulin hypermutation by inhibiting uracil-DNA glycosylase. Nature 2002, 419, 43–48. [Google Scholar]
  34. Di Noia, J.M.; Neuberger, M.S. Immunoglobulin gene conversion in chicken DT40 cells largely proceeds through an abasic site intermediate generated by excision of the uracil produced by AID-mediated deoxycytidine deamination. Eur. J. Immunol. 2004, 34, 504–508. [Google Scholar]
  35. Saribasak, H.; Saribasak, N.N.; Ipek, F.M.; Ellwart, J.W.; Arakawa, H.; Buerstedde, J.M. Uracil DNA glycosylase disruption blocks Ig gene conversion and induces transition mutations. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 365–371. [Google Scholar]
  36. Okazaki, I.M.; Hiai, H.; Kakazu, N.; Yamada, S.; Muramatsu, M.; Kinoshita, K.; Honjo, T. Constitutive expression of AID leads to tumorigenesis. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 197, 1173–1181. [Google Scholar]
  37. Matsumoto, Y.; Marusawa, H.; Kinoshita, K.; Endo, Y.; Kou, T.; Morisawa, T.; Azuma, T.; Okazaki, I.M.; Honjo, T.; Chiba, T. Helicobacter pylori infection triggers aberrant expression of activation-induced cytidine deaminase in gastric epithelium. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 470–476. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ordinario, E.C.; Yabuki, M.; Handa, P.; Cummings, W.J.; Maizels, N. RAD51 paralogs promote homology-directed repair at diversifying immunoglobulin V regions. BMC Mol. Biol. 2009, 10, 98. [Google Scholar]
  39. Conlon, T.M.; Meyer, K.B. The chicken Ig light chain 3′-enhancer is essential for gene expression and regulates gene conversion via the transcription factor E2A. Eur. J. Immunol. 2006, 36, 139–148. [Google Scholar]
  40. Schoetz, U.; Cervelli, M.; Wang, Y.D.; Fiedler, P.; Buerstedde, J.M. E2A expression stimulates Ig hypermutation. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 395–400. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kitao, H.; Kimura, M.; Yamamoto, K.; Seo, H.; Namikoshi, K.; Agata, Y.; Ohta, K.; Takata, M. Regulation of histone H4 acetylation by transcription factor E2A in Ig gene conversion. Int. Immunol. 2008, 20, 277–284. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kim, Y.; Tian, M. NF-kappaB family of transcription factor facilitates gene conversion in chicken B cells. Mol. Immunol. 2009, 46, 3283–3291. [Google Scholar]
  43. Yabuki, M.; Ordinario, E.C.; Cummings, W.J.; Fujii, M.M.; Maizels, N. E2A acts in cis in G1 phase of cell cycle to promote Ig gene diversification. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 408–415. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kothapalli, N.; Norton, D.D.; Fugmann, S.D. Cutting edge: a cis-acting DNA element targets AID-mediated sequence diversification to the chicken Ig light chain gene locus. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 2019–2023. [Google Scholar]
  45. Blagodatski, A.; Batrak, V.; Schmidl, S.; Schoetz, U.; Caldwell, R.B.; Arakawa, H.; Buerstedde, J.M. A cis-acting diversification activator both necessary and sufficient for AID-mediated hypermutation. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5, e1000332. [Google Scholar]
  46. Shen, H.M.; Poirier, M.G.; Allen, M.J.; North, J.; Lal, R.; Widom, J.; Storb, U. The activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) efficiently targets DNA in nucleosomes but only during transcription. J. Exp. Med. 2009, 206, 1057–1071. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kwon, J.; Morshead, K.B.; Guyon, J.R.; Kingston, R.E.; Oettinger, M.A. Histone acetylation and hSWI/SNF remodeling act in concert to stimulate V(D)J cleavage of nucleosomal DNA. Mol. Cell 2000, 6, 1037–1048. [Google Scholar]
  48. McMurry, M.T.; Krangel, M.S. A role for histone acetylation in the developmental regulation of VDJ recombination. Science 2000, 287, 495–498. [Google Scholar]
  49. McBlane, F.; Boyes, J. Stimulation of V(D)J recombination by histone acetylation. Curr. Biol. 2000, 10, 483–486. [Google Scholar]
  50. Li, Z.; Luo, Z.; Scharff, M.D. Differential regulation of histone acetylation and generation of mutations in switch regions is associated with Ig class switching. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 15428–15433. [Google Scholar]
  51. Nambu, Y.; Sugai, M.; Gonda, H.; Lee, C.G.; Katakai, T.; Agata, Y.; Yokota, Y.; Shimizu, A. Transcription-coupled events associating with immunoglobulin switch region chromatin. Science 2003, 302, 2137–2140. [Google Scholar]
  52. Seo, H.; Masuoka, M.; Murofushi, H.; Takeda, S.; Shibata, T.; Ohta, K. Rapid generation of specific antibodies by enhanced homologous recombination. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 731–735. [Google Scholar]
  53. Lin, W.; Hashimoto, S.; Seo, H.; Shibata, T.; Ohta, K. Modulation of immunoglobulin gene conversion frequency and distribution by the histone deacetylase HDAC2 in chicken DT40. Genes Cells 2008, 13, 255–268. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kurosawa, K.; Lin, W.; Ohta, K. Distinct roles of HDAC1 and HDAC2 in transcription and recombination at the immunoglobulin loci in the chicken B cell line DT40. J. Biochem. 2010, 148, 201–207. [Google Scholar]
  55. Cummings, W.J.; Yabuki, M.; Ordinario, E.C.; Bednarski, D.W.; Quay, S.; Maizels, N. Chromatin structure regulates gene conversion. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5, e246. [Google Scholar]
  56. Tremblay, A.; Jasin, M.; Chartrand, P. A double-strand break in a chromosomal LINE element can be repaired by gene conversion with various endogenous LINE elements in mouse cells. Mol. Cell Biol. 2000, 20, 54–60. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kurosawa, K.; Ohta, K. Genetic Diversification by Somatic Gene Conversion. Genes 2011, 2, 48-58. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes2010048

AMA Style

Kurosawa K, Ohta K. Genetic Diversification by Somatic Gene Conversion. Genes. 2011; 2(1):48-58. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes2010048

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kurosawa, Kohei, and Kunihiro Ohta. 2011. "Genetic Diversification by Somatic Gene Conversion" Genes 2, no. 1: 48-58. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes2010048

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop