Next Article in Journal
Spatiotemporal and Luminance Contrast Properties of Symmetry Perception
Next Article in Special Issue
Representing Sums of Finite Products of Chebyshev Polynomials of Third and Fourth Kinds by Chebyshev Polynomials
Previous Article in Journal
Gauss Map and Its Applications on Ruled Submanifolds in Minkowski Space
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Symmetric Identities for Fubini Polynomials

1
Department of Mathematics, College of Science, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300160, China
2
Department of Mathematics, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 139-701, Korea
3
Department of Mathematics, Sogang University, Seoul 121-742, Korea
4
Department of Mathematics Education and ERI, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Gyeongsangnamdo 52828, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2018, 10(6), 219; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10060219
Submission received: 20 April 2018 / Revised: 7 June 2018 / Accepted: 13 June 2018 / Published: 14 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends in Symmetric Polynomials with their Applications)

Abstract

:
We represent the generating function of w-torsion Fubini polynomials by means of a fermionic p-adic integral on Z p . Then we investigate a quotient of such p-adic integrals on Z p , representing generating functions of three w-torsion Fubini polynomials and derive some new symmetric identities for the w-torsion Fubini and two variable w-torsion Fubini polynomials.

1. Introduction and Preliminaries

In recent years, various p-adic integrals on Z p have been used in order to find many interesting symmetric identities related to some special polynomials and numbers. The relevant p-adic integrals are the Volkenborn, fermionic, q-Volkenborn, and q-fermionic integrals of which the last three were discovered by the first author T. Kim (see [1,2,3]). They have been used by a good number of researchers in various contexts and especially in unfolding new interesting symmetric identities. This verifies the usefulness of such p-adic integrals. Moreover, we can expect that people will find some further applications of these p-adic integrals in the years to come. The present paper is an effort in this direction. Assume that p is any fixed odd prime number. Throughout our discussion, we will use the standard notations Z p , Q p , and C p to denote the ring of p-adic integers, the field of p-adic rational numbers and the completion of the algebraic closure of Q p , respectively. The p-adic norm | · | p is normalized as | p | p = 1 p . Assume that f ( x ) is a continuous function on Z p . Then the fermionic p-adic integral of f ( x ) on Z p was introduced by Kim (see [2]) as
Z p f ( x ) d μ 1 ( x ) = lim N x = 0 p N 1 f ( x ) ( 1 ) x ,
where μ 1 ( x + p N Z p ) = ( 1 ) x .
We can easily deduce from (1) that (see [2,3])
Z p f ( x + 1 ) d μ 1 ( x ) + Z p f ( x ) d μ 1 ( x ) = 2 f ( 0 ) .
By invoking (2), we easily get (see [2,4])
Z p e ( x + y ) t d μ 1 ( y ) = 2 e t + 1 e x t = n = 0 E n ( x ) t n n ! ,
where E n ( x ) are the usual Euler polynomials.
As is known, the two variable Fubini polynomials are defined by means of the following (see [5,6])
n = 0 F n ( x , y ) t n n ! = 1 1 y ( e t 1 ) e x t .
When x = 0 , F n ( y ) = F n ( 0 , y ) , ( n 0 ), are called Fubini polynomials. Further, if y = 1 , then O b n = F n ( 0 , 1 ) are the ordered Bell numbers (also called Frobenius numbers). They first appeared in Cayley’s work on a combinatorial counting problem in 1859 and have many different combinatorial interpretations. For example, the ordered Bell numbers count the possible outcomes of a multi-candidate election. From (3) and (4), we note that F n ( x , 1 / 2 ) = E n ( x ) , ( n 0 ) . By (4), we easily get (see [6]),
F n ( y ) = k = 0 n S 2 ( n , k ) k ! y k , ( n 0 ) ,
where S 2 ( n , k ) are the Stirling numbers of the second kind.
For w N , we define the two variable w-torsion Fubini polynomials given by
1 1 y w ( e t 1 ) w e x t = n = 0 F n , w ( x , y ) t n n ! .
In particular, for x = 0 , F n , w ( y ) = F n , w ( 0 , y ) are called the w-torsion Fubini polynomials. It is obvious that F n , 1 ( x , y ) = F n ( x , y ) .
We represent the generating function of w-torsion Fubini polynomials by means of a fermionic p-adic integral on Z p . Then we investigate a quotient of such p-adic integrals on Z p , representing generating functions of three w-torsion Fubini polynomials and derive some new symmetric identities for the w-torsion Fubini and two variable w-torsion Fubini polynomials. Recently, a number of researchers have studied symmetric identities for some special polynomials. The reader may refer to [7,8,9,10,11] as an introduction to this active area of research. Some symmetric identities for q-special polynomials and numbers were treated in [12,13,14,15], including q-Bernoulli, q-Euler, and q-Genocchi numbers and polynomials. While some identities of symmetry for degenerate special polynomials were discussed in the more recent papers [6,16,17]. Finally, interested readers may want to have a glance at [18,19] as general references on polynomials.

2. Symmetric Identities for w -torsion Fubini and Two Variable w -torsion Fubini Polynomials

From (2), we note that
Z p ( 1 ) x ( y ( e t 1 ) ) x d μ 1 ( x ) = 2 1 y ( e t 1 ) = 2 n = 0 F n ( y ) t n n ! ,
and
e x t Z p ( 1 ) z ( y ( e t 1 ) ) z d μ 1 ( z ) = 2 1 y ( e t 1 ) e x t = 2 n = 0 F n ( x , y ) t n n ! .
From (7) and (8), we note that
l = 0 x l t l l ! m = 0 2 F m ( y ) t m m ! = e x t Z p ( 1 ) z ( y ( e t 1 ) ) z d μ 1 ( z ) = n = 0 2 F n ( x , y ) t n n ! .
Thus, by (9), we easily get
l = 0 n n l x l F n l ( y ) = F n ( x , y ) , ( n 0 ) .
Now, we observe that
1 y k ( e t 1 ) k 1 y ( e t 1 ) = i = 0 k 1 y i ( e t 1 ) i = i = 0 k 1 l = 0 i i l ( 1 ) i l y i e l t = n = 0 i = 0 k 1 l = 0 i i l ( 1 ) i l y i l n t n n ! = n = 0 i = 0 k 1 y i Δ i 0 n t n n ! ,
where Δ f ( x ) = f ( x + 1 ) f ( x ) .
For w N , the w-torsion Fubini polynomials are represented by means of the following fermionic p-adic integral on Z p :
Z p ( y w ( e t 1 ) w ) x d μ 1 ( x ) = 2 1 y w ( e t 1 ) w = n = 0 2 F n , w ( y ) t n n ! ,
From (7) and (12), we have
Z p ( y ( e t 1 ) ) x d μ 1 ( x ) Z p ( y w 1 ( e t 1 ) w 1 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) = 1 y w 1 ( e t 1 ) w 1 1 y ( e t 1 ) = i = 0 w 1 1 y i ( e t 1 ) i = n = 0 i = 0 w 1 1 y i Δ i 0 n t n n ! , ( w 1 N ) .
For w 1 , w 2 N , we let
I = Z p ( y w 1 ( e t 1 ) w 1 ) x 1 d μ 1 ( x 1 ) Z p ( y w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 2 ) x 2 d μ 1 ( x 2 ) Z p ( y w 1 w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 1 w 2 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) .
Here it is important to observe that (14) has the built-in symmetry. Namely, it is invariant under the interchange of w 1 and w 2 .
Then, by (14), we get
I = Z p ( y w 1 ( e t 1 ) w 1 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) × Z p ( y w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 2 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) Z p ( y w 1 w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 1 w 2 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) .
First, we observe that
Z p ( y w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 2 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) Z p ( y w 1 w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 1 w 2 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) = 1 y w 1 w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 1 w 2 1 y w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 2 = i = 0 w 1 1 y w 2 i ( e t 1 ) w 2 i = i = 0 w 1 1 y w 2 i l = 0 w 2 i w 2 i l ( 1 ) w 2 i l e l t = n = 0 i = 0 w 1 1 y w 2 i Δ w 2 i 0 n t n n ! .
From (15) and (16), we can derive the following equation.
I = Z p ( y w 1 ( e t 1 ) w 1 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) × Z p ( y w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 2 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) Z p ( y w 1 w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 1 w 2 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) = m = 0 2 F m , w 1 ( y ) t m m ! × k = 0 ( i = 0 w 1 1 y w 2 i Δ w 2 i 0 k t k k ! = n = 0 2 k = 0 n i = 0 w 1 1 y w 2 i Δ w 2 i 0 k F n k , w 1 ( y ) n k t n n ! .
Interchanging the roles of w 1 and w 2 , by (14), we get
I = Z p ( y w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 2 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) × Z p ( y w 1 ( e t 1 ) w 1 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) Z p ( y w 1 w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 1 w 2 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) .
We note that
Z p ( y w 1 ( e t 1 ) w 1 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) Z p ( y w 1 w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 1 w 2 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) = 1 y w 1 w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 1 w 2 1 y w 1 ( e t 1 ) w 1 = i = 0 w 2 1 y w 1 i ( e t 1 ) w 1 i = n = 0 i = 0 w 2 1 y w 1 i Δ w 1 i 0 n t n n ! .
Thus, by (18) and (19), we get
I = Z p ( y w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 2 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) × Z p ( y w 1 ( e t 1 ) w 1 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) Z p ( y w 1 w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 1 w 2 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) = m = 0 2 F m , w 2 ( y ) t m m ! × k = 0 ( i = 0 w 2 1 y w 1 i Δ w 1 i 0 k t k k ! = n = 0 2 k = 0 n i = 0 w 2 1 y w 1 i Δ w 1 i 0 k F n k , w 2 ( y ) n k t n n ! .
The following theorem is now obtained by Equations (17) and (20).
Theorem 1.
For w 1 , w 2 N with w 1 1 (mod 2), w 2 1 (mod 2), n 0 , we have
k = 0 n i = 0 w 1 1 n k F n k , w 1 ( y ) y w 2 i Δ w 2 i 0 k = k = 0 n i = 0 w 2 1 n k F n k , w 2 ( y ) y w 1 i Δ w 1 i 0 k .
Remark 1.
In particular, for w 1 = 1 , we have
F n ( y ) = k = 0 n i = 0 w 2 1 n k F n k , w 2 ( y ) y i Δ i 0 k .
By expressing I in a different way, we have
I = Z p ( y w 1 ( e t 1 ) w 1 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) × Z p ( y w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 2 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) Z p ( y w 1 w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 1 w 2 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) = Z p ( y w 1 ( e t 1 ) w 1 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) × 1 y w 1 w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 1 w 2 1 y w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 2 = i = 0 w 1 1 y w 2 i ( e t 1 ) w 2 i × 2 1 y w 1 ( e t 1 ) w 1 = i = 0 w 1 1 l = 0 w 2 i w 2 i l y w 2 i ( 1 ) l 2 1 y w 1 ( e t 1 ) w 1 e ( w 2 i l ) t = 2 n = 0 i = 0 w 1 1 l = 0 w 2 i w 2 i l y w 2 i ( 1 ) l F n , w 1 ( w 2 i l , y ) t n n ! .
Interchanging the roles of w 1 and w 2 , by (14), we get
I = Z p ( y w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 2 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) × Z p ( y w 1 ( e t 1 ) w 1 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) Z p ( y w 1 w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 1 w 2 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) = Z p ( y w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 2 ) x d μ 1 ( x ) × 1 y w 1 w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 1 w 2 1 y w 1 ( e t 1 ) w 1 = i = 0 w 2 1 y w 1 i ( e t 1 ) w 1 i × 2 1 y w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 2 = i = 0 w 2 1 l = 0 w 1 i y w 1 i w 1 i l ( 1 ) l 2 1 y w 2 ( e t 1 ) w 2 e ( w 1 i l ) t = 2 n = 0 i = 0 w 2 1 l = 0 w 1 i y w 1 i w 1 i l ( 1 ) l F n , w 2 ( w 1 i l , y ) t n n ! .
Hence, by Equations (23) and (24), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 2.
For w 1 , w 2 N with w 1 1 (mod 2), w 2 1 (mod 2), n 0 , we have
i = 0 w 1 1 l = 0 w 2 i y w 2 i w 2 i l ( 1 ) l F n , w 1 ( w 2 i l , y ) = i = 0 w 2 1 l = 0 w 1 i y w 1 i w 1 i l ( 1 ) l F n , w 2 ( w 1 i l , y ) .
Remark 2.
Especially, if we take w 1 = 1 , then by Theorem 2, we get
F n ( y ) = i = 0 w 2 1 l = 0 i i l y i ( 1 ) l F n , w 2 ( i l , y ) .

3. Conclusions

In this paper, we introduced w-torsion Fubini polynomials as a generalization of Fubini polynomials and expressed the generating function of w-torsion Fubini polynomials by means of a fermionic p-adic integral on Z p . Then we derived some new symmetric identities for the w-torsion Fubini and two variable w-torsion Fubini polynomials by investigating a quotient of such p-adic integrals on Z p , representing generating functions of three w-torsion Fubini polynomials. It seems that they are the first double symmetric identities on Fubini polynomials. As was done, for example in [4,20,21], we expect that this result can be extended to the case of triple symmetric identities. That is one of our next projects.

Author Contributions

T.K. and D.S.K. conceived the framework and structured the whole paper; T.K. wrote the paper; G.-W.J. and J.K. checked the results of the paper; D.S.K. and J.K. completed the revision of the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kim, T. q-Volkenborn integration. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 2002, 9, 288–299. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kim, T. Symmetry of power sum polynomials and multivariate fermionic p-adic invariant integral on Z p . Russ. J. Math. Phys. 2009, 16, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, T. A study on the q-Euler numbers and the fermionic q-integral of the product of several type q-Bernstein polynomials on Z p . Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. 2013, 23, 5–11. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kim, D.S.; Park, K.H. Identities of symmetry for Bernoulli polynomials arising from quotients of Volkenborn integrals invariant under S3. Appl. Math. Comput. 2013, 219, 5096–5104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kilar, N.; Simsek, Y. A new family of Fubini type numbers and polynomials associated with Apostol-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials. J. Korean Math. Soc. 2017, 54, 1605–1621. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Jang, G.-W. A note on degenerate Fubini polynomials. Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 2017, 20, 521–531. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kim, Y.-H.; Hwang, K.-H. Symmery of power sum and twisted Bernoulli polynomials. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2009, 18, 127–133. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lee, J.G.; Kwon, J.; Jang, G.-W.; Jang, L.-C. Some identities of λ-Daehee polynomials. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2017, 10, 4137–4142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rim, S.-H.; Jeong, J.-H.; Lee, S.-J.; Moon, E.-J.; Jin, J.-H. On the symmetric properties for the generalized twisted Genocchi polynomials. ARS Comb. 2012, 105, 267–272. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rim, S.-H.; Moon, E.-J.; Jin, J.-H.; Lee, S.-J. On the symmetric properties for the generalized Genocchi polynomials. J. Comput. Anal. Appl. 2011, 13, 1240–1245. [Google Scholar]
  11. Seo, J.J.; Kim, T. Some identities of symmetry for Daehee polynomials arising from p-adic invariant integral on Z p . Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 2016, 19, 285–292. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ağyüz, E.; Acikgoz, M.; Araci, S. A symmetric identity on the q-Genocchi polynomials of higher-order under third dihedral group D3. Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 2015, 18, 177–187. [Google Scholar]
  13. He, Y. Symmetric identities for Calitz’s q-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013, 2013, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Moon, E.-J.; Rim, S.-H.; Jin, J.-H.; Lee, S.-J. On the symmetric properties of higher-order twisted q-Euler numbers and polynoamials. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2010, 2010, 765259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ryoo, C.S. An identity of the symmetry for the second kind q-Euler polynomials. J. Comput. Anal. Appl. 2013, 15, 294–299. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S. An identity of symmetry for the degenerate Frobenius-Euler polynomials. Math. Slovaca 2018, 68, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S. Identities of symmetry for degenerate Euler polynomials and alternating generalized falling factorial sums. Iran J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A Sci. 2017, 41, 939–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Carlitz, L. Eulerian numbers and polynomials. Math. Mag. 1959, 32, 247–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Milovanović, G.V.; Mitrinović, D.S.; Rassias, T.M. Topics in Polynomials: Extremal Problems, Inequalities, Zeros; World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc.: River Edge, NJ, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T. Triple symmetric identities for w-Catalan polynomials. J. Korean Math. Soc. 2017, 54, 1243–1264. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim, D.S.; Lee, N.; Na, J.; Park, K.H. Identities of symmetry for higher-order Euler polynomials in the three varibles (I). Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2012, 22, 51–74. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Jang, G.-W.; Kwon, J. Symmetric Identities for Fubini Polynomials. Symmetry 2018, 10, 219. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10060219

AMA Style

Kim T, Kim DS, Jang G-W, Kwon J. Symmetric Identities for Fubini Polynomials. Symmetry. 2018; 10(6):219. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10060219

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Taekyun, Dae San Kim, Gwan-Woo Jang, and Jongkyum Kwon. 2018. "Symmetric Identities for Fubini Polynomials" Symmetry 10, no. 6: 219. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10060219

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop