Next Article in Journal
A Study on Interaction of Gaze Pointer-Based User Interface in Mobile Virtual Reality Environment
Next Article in Special Issue
Chiral Analysis of Pesticides and Drugs of Environmental Concern: Biodegradation and Enantiomeric Fraction
Previous Article in Journal
On the Form and Growth of Complex Crystals: The Case of Tsai-Type Clusters
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enantiomeric Separation of Tramadol and Its Metabolites: Method Validation and Application to Environmental Samples
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Chiral Stationary Phases for Liquid Chromatography Based on Chitin- and Chitosan-Derived Marine Polysaccharides

1
Laboratório de Química Orgânica e Farmacêutica, Departamento de Ciências Químicas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
2
Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR), Edifício do Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Av. General Norton de Matos s/n, 4050-208 Matosinhos, Portugal
3
CESPU, Instituto de Investigação e Formação Avançada em Ciências e Tecnologias da Saúde (IINFACTS), Rua Central de Gandra, 1317, 4585-116 Gandra PRD, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2017, 9(9), 190; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9090190
Submission received: 1 August 2017 / Revised: 6 September 2017 / Accepted: 6 September 2017 / Published: 11 September 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chiral Separations)

Abstract

:
The development of chiral stationary phases (CSPs) for liquid chromatography (LC) revolutionized the enantioseparation and, nowadays, different types of CSPs are commercially available. Polysaccharide-based CSPs are one of the most versatile and widely used for both analytical and preparative applications and they are able to resolve several classes of racemates. Phenylcarbamates of amylose and cellulose derivatives are the most successful; however, polysaccharide-based CSPs comprising marine-derived polysaccharides are also described revealing high chiral recognition abilities and wider range of mobile phases. A literature survey covering the report on chitin and chitosan based CSPs is presented. The chemical structure of the chiral selectors, their development and applications in chiral LC are emphasized.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, there are several types of chiral stationary phases (CSPs), including Pirkle-type, ligand-exchange-type, crown ether-based, cyclodextrin-based, macrocyclic antibiotics-based, ion-exchange-type, polysaccharide-based, molecular imprinted, synthetic polymer-based, protein-based, among others [1,2,3,4].
Polysaccharides are polymers comprising several units of monosaccharides linked to each other by a glycosidic bond [5]. There are several types of polysaccharides, and some of them have been studied as possible chiral selectors for LC (Figure 1).
The first study reporting the use of polysaccharide derivatives as a practical chiral packing material for LC columns was described by Hesse and Hagel in 1973 [6]. Therefore, several polysaccharides were derivatized, and coated on macroporous aminopropyl silica. Cellulose and amylose-based CSPs showed the best chiral recognition for all the tested analytes [7]. Phenylcarbamates, esters, alkylcarbamates and benzylcarbamates derivatives of cellulose and amylose derivatives were developed as selectors for CSPs. Since then, other research groups have demonstrated interest in the development of amylose [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15] and cellulose [10,14,16,17,18,19,20,21] derivatives as CSPs, including coating onto microporous silica [9,22,23]. Several reviews focusing the preparation and evaluation of this type of CSPs can be found [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. Phenylcarbamates are the derivatives most studied due to their high chiral ability recognition and the possibility to explore different aryl substituents [35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. The tris-phenylcarbamate CSPs generally have high enantioseparation abilities however, the chiral recognition is greatly influenced by the substituents present on the phenyl moiety of the phenylcarbamates [7,8,9,13,42]. Among the developed amylose and cellulose tris-phenylcarbamates, the 3,5-dimethylphenyl derivatives proved to have the best enantiorecognition performance [8,9,43,44] being, nowadays, the most widely used CSPs (Figure 2).
The carbamate derivatives of amylose and cellulose can be synthesized by reaction of the polysaccharide with the corresponding isocyanate comprising the moiety of the desired derivative for the CSP [7,8,43]. The phenylcarbamates of amylose and cellulose can be coated [7,8,11] or be immobilized [25,26,27,45] on a chromatographic support, mainly aminopropyl silica.
Although the coated CSPs show high chiral recognition abilities for a wide variety of racemates, the range of mobile phases that can be used is very limited. Mobile phases containing organic solvents such as tetrahydrofuran, dichloromethane or ethyl acetate, among others, are not suitable for the coated CSPs. The immobilization of phenylcarbamates of amylose and cellulose was carried out to solve this problem [31,32]. However, the immobilized CSPs have also some drawbacks. Their lower chiral recognition ability is the main disadvantage, which can be explained by the fact that the immobilization of the polysaccharide derivative on the chromatographic support is done through the hydroxyl groups, causing a disturbance in the high-ordered structures of the polysaccharide [27].

2. Marine Polysaccharide-Derived CSPs

Marine-derived polysaccharides have also been exploited as chiral selectors, and some of them proved to be good alternatives to amylose and cellulose derivatives.
Braconnot discovered chitin, a marine polysaccharide obtained by isolation from shells of crustaceans and mollusks, in the early 19th century [46]. Chitin is one of the most abundant polysaccharides comprising N-acetyl-d-glucosamine units linked by β-(1,4).
Chitosan is a 2-deoxy-2-glucosamine polysaccharide, discovered in 1859 by Rouget after deacetylation of chitin by boiling in concentrated potassium hydroxide solution [47]. Both marine-derived polysaccharides have diverse applications whether in medicine as wound healing agents [48], as drug carriers [49,50], in bone tissue regeneration [51] as well as in the food industry as clarification agents [52], among others. Another important application is their use as suitable chiral selectors for LC [26]. In fact, they have been used as CSPs, since Okamoto et al., in 1984, introduced the first phenylcarbamate of chitosan. Considering chitin, the first reported study was published by Cass et al., in 1996, describing the chiral discrimination ability of two arylcarbamates of chitin [53].
A literature survey covering the report on chitin and chitosan based CSPs is the main objective of this review. Different CSPs were developed allowing the enantioresolution of several different analytes (α > 1.00) (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6).
The structures of the separated analytes (A1A73) are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4.

2.1. Chitin-Based CSPs

The bis-phenylcarbamate (1) and bis-3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate (2) (Table 1), coated on microporous aminopropyl silica, were the first described chitin-based CSPs [53]. Two distinct sources of chitin (commercial and noncommercial) were used for the preparation of both polysaccharide derivatives. Interestingly, the results obtained demonstrated that the chiral discrimination of both aryl carbamate derivatives was significantly affected by the source of chitin used. For example, from the series of racemates tested, only (E)-1-chloro-1,2-diphenylethane oxide was resolved on the CSPs prepared using a commercial chitin, with α values of 1.5 and 2.0 in CSPs 1 and 2, respectively. The similar bis-aryl carbamate derivatives of a noncommercial chitin presented higher resolution power compared with commercial chitin. These results are due to the differences related to the resource and method used for isolation and purification of chitin, which can influence its quality and, consequently, the length of its molecular chain, number of acetyl groups as well as the 3D structure [53]. Yamamoto et al., developed a chiral selector from chitin, the bis-3,5-dichlorophenylcarbamate (3) (Table 1) as well as both derivatives previously described (1 and 2) to study the influence of the aryl groups as substituents on chiral discrimination performance [54]. Among the three, the bis-3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate (2) and bis-3,5-dichlorophenylcarbamate (3) exhibited, in general, higher chiral recognition than bis-phenylcarbamate (1). Moreover, some chiral 2-arylpropionic acids such as ketoprofen and ibuprofen were efficiently resolved on bis-3,5-dichlorophenylcarbamate (3) with α values of 1.72 and 1.39, respectively [54]. In a continuous interest in developing new chitin-based CSPs, the same group developed 3,5-disubstituted (25) and several 4-substituted phenylcarbamate (613) chitin derivatives in an extensive study that also included three cycloalkylcarbamates (1416) and both configurations of one optically active arylalkylcarbamate (17) (Table 1) [54]. All CSPs were obtained by coating the chitin derivatives on macroporous silica gel. The nature of the substituents as well as their position on the phenyl moiety of the carbamate demonstrated to have a significant role on chiral recognition. It was proposed that the polar carbamates and acetamide residues of the chitin phenylcarbamates were the most important interaction sites for chiral recognition, with the substituents of the phenyl group having influence on the polarities of these sites [55]. Regarding the chitin 3,5-disubstituted phenylcarbamates, the 3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate (2) showed the highest chiral recognition although the remaining three 3,5-disubstituted phenylcarbamates (35) also presented good chromatographic results. Additionally, the 3,5-dimethyl- (2) and 3,5-dichlorophenylcarbamates (3) demonstrated some complementary in terms of enantiorecognition. Considering the 4-substituted phenylcarbamates of chitin (613), some interesting results were obtained. The 4-methylphenyl- (8), 4-chlorophenyl- (11) and 4-trifluoromethylphenyl- (12) carbamates showed the highest enantiorecognition while 4-tert-butyl- (6) and 4-isopropylphenyl- (7) carbamates presented lower retention and enantioselectivity for the tested racemates. The CSPs comprising the cycloalkylcarbamates 15 and 16 revealed relatively low enantiorecognition, both resolving only two of the ten analyzed racemates, the 2,2’-dihydroxy-6,6’-dimethylbiphenyl (α = 1.09 and α = 1.03, respectively) and 2-phenylcyclohexanone (α = 1.29 and α = 1.24, respectively) [54]. For both enantiomers of chitin 1-phenylethylcarbamate (17), low chiral recognition ability was observed which was depended on their configuration. For example, (S)-1-phenylethylcarbamate of chitin showed enantioselectivity for benzoin, 2-phenylcyclohexanone and 1-(9-anthryl)-2,2,2-trifluoroethanol, whereas no separation was observed for these analytes with its antipode CSP, which separated other racemates (Table 1).
Considering that the chitin derivatives have a very low solubility, the possibility to perform enantioseparations under reversed phase as well as using different solvents in normal phase, such as chloroform and ethyl acetate, was also studied (Table 1). Both chromatographic elution conditions were tested for 3,5-dimethyl- (2) and 3,5-dichlorophenylcarbamates (3) and, in some cases, the racemates were more efficiently resolved under reversed phase mode [55].
Following the same strategy, and aiming the enantioseparation of tadalafil and its intermediates, Zhang et al., synthesized new chitin bis-arylcarbamates, specifically chitin 3-chloro-4-methyl- (18), 4-trifluoromethoxy- (19) and 4-chloro-3-trifluoromethyl- (20) phenylcarbamates (Table 1) [56]. The three chitin derivatives were coated on macroporous 3-aminopropyl silica and the obtained CSPs were successful in the enatioresolution of all tested analytes [56].
Recently, the same group developed a new strategy to enhance the chromatographic performance of chitin-based CSPs [57,58]. The aim was combining amylose or cellulose with chitin derivatives and coated on silica gel to improve the chiral recognition as well as their stability and solvent resistance. The first report of this type of biselector as CSPs comprised amylose tris-3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate and chitin bis-3-chloro-4-methylphenlcarbamate (18) blended at different molar ratios [58]. Although the chiral recognition of the blended CSPs did not improve significantly, comparing to the single selector CSPs, there was a great improvement in the solvent tolerance and stability. Interestingly, the biselector CSPs prepared by blending chitin bis-3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate (3) with cellulose bis-4-methylbenzoate and cellulose bis-3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate sowed better chiral recognition capabilities compared to the corresponding single selectors [57]. They can also work in a wider range of mobile phases.
All the described chitin-based CSPs were prepared by coating method and, to the best of our knowledge, there is no studies reporting immobilized chitin derivatives as well as commercially available chitin-based CSPs.

2.2. Chitosan-Based CSPs

Several studies regarding chitosan-based CSPs are found in literature. The first studies were focused mainly on tris-phenylcarbamates of chitosan. In the last decades, an increasingly number of bis-phenylcarbamates of chitosan have been described. Furthermore, besides the traditional coating method, same chitosan-based CSPs were prepared by immobilization of the chitosan-derivatives on the chromatographic support.

2.2.1. Chitosan Tris-Carbamate CSPs

As previously mentioned, the first study of a chitosan derivative as a CSP was published by Okamoto et al., in 1984 [7]. In this study, they compared the chiral discrimination ability of various polysaccharide phenylcarbamates as CSPs. Chitosan tris-phenylcarbamate derivative (21) coated on macroporous aminopropyl silica was found to resolve the enantiomers of 1-(9-anthryl)-2,2,2-trifluoroethanol with a α value of 2.25 (Table 2) [7].
In 1998, the same group compared the chiral recognition performance of 3,5-dichloro- and 3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate derivatives of several polysaccharides, including chitosan (22, 23) (Table 2) [60]. These two chitosan derivatives presented a relatively high chiral recognition for the tested racemates, setting their potential use as CSPs [60]. In the same year, Franco et al., described another strategy to obtain new chitosan-based CSPs by bonding the chitin-carbamate derivatives on chromatographic support [44]. The obtained bonded CSPs allowed the use of a larger panel of solvents in the mobile phases compared to coated ones. Accordingly, the 3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate derivative of chitosan (23i) was mixed with 10-undecenoyl and covalently immobilized on allyl silica gel, which demonstrate to be very useful in the separation of several racemates, such as lormetazepam and temazepam with a α value of 1.80 (Table 2). The mobile phases comprising either different proportions of heptane/2-propanol and heptane/chloroform mixtures allowed the best enantioresolutions [44].
Other mixed 10-undecenoyl/phenylcarbamate (22i) or benzoyl derivatives of chitosan (24i25i), comprising different substituents in the aromatic ring, were prepared and immobilized on allyl silica gel (Table 2) [61]. Among the chitosan derivatives, the 3,5-dichlorophenylcarbamate derivative (22i) was found to have the most significant chiral discrimination ability.
In another study, the synthesis and chromatographic evaluation of the chitosan derivatives 22 and 23 as well as four new chitosan derivatives (2528) were described (Table 2) [62]. All derivatives were coated on macroporous silica gel and evaluated as CSPs. Among them, the 3,5-dichloro- (22), 3,5-dimethyl- (23), and 3,4-dichlorophenylcarbamate (27) derivatives showed the best enantioseparation results for the tested racemates. The chiral recognition of the CSP based on the latter chitosan derivative (27) was investigated using chloroform as a component of the mobile phase, and some racemates were better resolved, including trans-stilbene oxide, trans-cyclopropanedicarboxylic acid and 1,2,2,2-tetraphenylethanol, with α values of 1.43, 1.38 and 1.31, respectively.
Another group described a study focused on the enantioresolution ability of the tris-3-chlorophenylcarbamate of chitosan (26) using various mobile phases [64]. They demonstrated that, in general, the alcohol used as organic modifier in the mobile phase greatly influenced the enantioseparation performance of the CSP. Baseline separations or near-baseline separations were achieved for benzoin (α = 1.42), penconazole (α = 1.52), hexaconazole (α = 1.39) and epoxiconazole (α = 1.36), whereas the other racemates were partially separated (Table 2) [64].
Zhang et al., also evaluated the enantioresolution of fourteen derivatives (2126, 2835) (Table 2) and concluded that like chitin phenylcarbamates [55], the nature of substituents and their position in the phenyl moiety, played a great role in the enantiorecognition of the derivative [59]. In fact, the 3,5-disubstituted phenylcarbamates of chitosan (2223) CSPs have the highest chiral recognition abilities while 2-substituted phenylcarbamate (2426, 2835) CSPs showed the lowest enantiorecognition. Additionally, mobile phases containing ethyl acetate and chloroform were studied and, once again, revealed to improve the enantiorecognition performance of the CSPs [59].
To our knowledge, the most recent study with chitosan tris-phenylcarbamates was published by Guntari et al., in 2014 [63]. In this study, they developed and evaluated a new way of immobilization of chitosan tris-3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate (23) using continuous assembly of polymers techniques. These techniques employed a catalyst immobilized on silica particles to produce stable CSPs suitable to be used in a wide range of mobile phases. The obtained CSP proved to be effective in separating the enantiomers of Trögers base and trans-stilbene oxide [63].

2.2.2. Chitosan Bis-Carbamate CSPs

The first study related to bis-carbamate derivatives as chiral selectors for LC was described by Son et al., in 2006, which reported the development of a CSP based on chitosan bis-3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate in which the amine group of the chitosan was modified with N-nicotinoyl-l-phenylalanine (36) (Table 3) [65]. The bis-phenylcarbamate derivative 36 demonstrated a high solubility in several organic solvents and, consequently, was easily coated on aminopropyl silica. The LC performance of the obtained CSP was evaluated using different mobile phases and all the tested racemates were enantioseparated. The best chromatographic result was achieved for flavanone with α and Rs values of 4.70 and 4.33, respectively, using a mixture of hexane/2-propanol 80:20 as mobile phase [65].
In 2008, Yamamoto et al., prepared several bis-carbamate derivatives with the amino group of chitosan replaced by an imide moiety (3745) (Table 4) [62]. This study showed interesting results of enantioresolution for all the CSPs based on imide-chitosan derivatives. Examples include the resolution of trans-cyclopropanedicarboxylic acid dianilide in CSPs 42 and 45 with α values of 1.78 and 1.63 respectively, and the resolution of cobalt(III) tris (acetylacetonate) in CSP 41 with a α value of 1.84.
In recent studies (2016), Tang et al., prepared several bis-phenylcarbamate derivatives in which the amine moiety of chitosan was modified by an isobutyrylamide moiety (4657) [66,67]. The synthesized chitosan derivatives were coated on aminopropyl silica resulting in a series of new CSPs for LC. Considering their poor solubility, they were able to withstand operations with other mobile phases than the typical hexane/2-propanol (Table 5). They demonstrated high solvent tolerance and could still work after being flushed with chloroform (100%), ethyl acetate (100%) or tetrahydrofuran/n-hexane (70:30 v/v) without significant loss of enantioseparation. Furthermore, the CSPs presented chiral recognition performance for some of the tested racemates, including Troger’s base in CSPs 47, 49, 50, 55 and 57, with α values of 1.40, 1.46, 1.54, 1.53 and 1.30 respectively, using n-hexane/2-propanol (90/10 v/v) as mobile phase (Table 5) [66,67].
In the same year, some bis-phenylcarbamate derivatives with different substituents in both phenylcarbamate and amine moieties (5861) were obtained by the same group (Table 5) [69]. The synthesized chitosan derivatives were coated on aminopropyl silica, and showed chiral recognition for the majority of the tested racemates. These new CSPs also proved to be stable when used with other mobile phases than the typical hexane/2-propanol [69].
Other CSPs based on the substitution of the amine of chitosan with an alkyl moiety, prior to the derivatization of the hydroxyl groups with different isocyanates were described [68,70]. Actually, Feng et al., prepared several bis-4-methylphenylcarbamates with different alkyl moieties linked in the amine group of chitosan (6264) (Table 5) [68]. These derivatives were coated on aminopropyl silica and showed good chiral recognition abilities, being equivalent to the CSP comprising 3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate of amylose.
Furthermore, Zhang et al., developed several CSPs based on N-cyclobutylformilated chitosan derivatives (6571) (Table 5) [70]. These CSPs showed good chiral recognition abilities, specially the CSPs comprising the chitosan-derivatives 66, 67 and 68, being able to recognize most of the tested racemates. Additional analysis were performed to evaluate the tolerability to other organic solvents, which showed no significant changes in the enantiorecognition abilities of the tested CSPs after being flushed with ethyl acetate (100%), chloroform (100%) and hexane/tetrahydrofuran (50/50, 40/60, 30/70 v/v) [70].
Recently, Feng et al., developed several new CSPs containing a n-pentyl-amide moiety (7276b) (Table 5) [71]. The LC performance of these CSPs was evaluated, and proved to have high chiral recognition abilities. The influence of the molecular weight of the chitosan on the chiral recognition capability of the developed CSPs (76a and 76b) was also evaluated, showing that a lower molecular weight allowed better chiral recognition abilities, resolving N-(1-phenylethyl)benzamide (α = 1.30) and 3-(dimethylamino)-1-thiophen-2-yl)propan-1-ol (α = 1.10) whilst CSP 76b was not able to resolve these racemates. Once again, this type of CSPs (chitosan-based) showed high tolerability for other organic solvents than the typically used for coated-type CSPs.
Wang et al., developed several new chitosan bis-phenylcarbamates with the amine moiety being derivatized with a N-octyl urea (7782) (Table 6) [72]. The obtained CSPs showed good chiral recognition abilities, being equivalent to those comprising 3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamates of amylose and cellulose. For instance, these CSPs were capable of resolving several racemates such as voriconazole with α values higher than 1.95.
Other chitosan bis-3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamates with different moieties linked to the chitosan amine group (8387) were developed by Wang et al., (Table 6) [73]. The obtained CSPs showed good chiral recognition abilities, especially the CSP comprising the chitosan-derivative 87, which was able to recognize all the tested racemates, such as Troger’s base (α = 1.33), benzoin (α = 1.47) and voriconazole (α = 2.89).
To our knowledge, the most recent study on chitosan bis-phenylcarbamate derivatives was published by Liang et al., [74]. In this study, several CSPs based on chitosan N-isobutylurea (88a91b) were prepared (Table 6). Two types of chitosan with different molecular weights were used. In this study, the CSPs developed with higher molecular weight chitosan (88a, 89a, 91a) showed lower chiral recognition ability than their low molecular weight chitosan counterparts (88b, 89b, 91b), with the exception of derivative 90a that showed higher chiral recognition ability than derivative 90b. These CSPs were also able to withstand organic solvents such as ethyl acetate (100%) and chloroform (100%) [74].

2.2.3. Chitosan Amine-Carbamate CSPs

Liu et al., in 2006, postulated that the development of a chitosan CSP would be an excellent tool to be used in chiral ligand-exchange chromatography (CLEC), considering the high binding capacity of chitosan to heavy metals [75]. Consequently, they described the immobilization of chitosan into silica gel and the application of the obtained CSP (Figure 5) in CLEC to achieve enantioresolution of a variety of α-hydroxycarboxylic acids and α-aminoacids using CuSO4 100% or CuSO4/MeOH (80:20 v/v) as mobile phases [75]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only report related to the application of chitosan-derived CSPs for this type of study.

3. Conclusions

Polysaccharide-based CSPs are of great value and are being recognized as highly successful for both analytical and preparative separations. Among them, amylose and cellulose carbamate derivatives are the most widely used CSPs for the efficient resolution of several racemates revealing very high chiral recognition abilities.
Although several efficient polysaccharide-based CSPs are described in the literature and many of them are commercially available, studies on new and improved polysaccharide-based CSPs are still being conducted. The research is mainly focused on the immobilization of the chiral selectors on chromatographic support, allowing the use of a wider range of mobile phases and, consequently, increasing the range of their applications. Polysaccharide-based CSPs comprising other natural polymers and derivatives such as tris-phenylcarbamates of chitin and chitosan as well as bis-phenylcarbamates of chitosan also showed high chiral recognition abilities being able to resolve diverse types of racemates. Most of these CSPs were obtained by the traditional coating method; however, regarding their poor solubility they were able to perform enantioseparations under reversed phase as well as using different solvents as components of the mobile phases in normal phase, such as chloroform and ethyl acetate. Some chitosan-based CSPs were also prepared by immobilization of the chiral selector on the chromatographic support.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported through national funds provided by FCT/MCTES—Foundation for Science and Technology from the Minister of Science, Technology and Higher Education (PIDDAC) and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the COMPETE—Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade (POFC) programme, under the Strategic Funding UID/Multi/04423/2013, the project PTDC/MAR-BIO/4694/2014 (reference POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016790; Project 3599—Promover a Produção Científica e Desenvolvimento Tecnológico e a Constituição de Redes Temáticas (3599-PPCDT)) in the framework of the programme PT2020 as well as by the project INNOVMAR—Innovation and Sustainability in the Management and Exploitation of Marine Resources (reference NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000035, within Research Line NOVELMAR), supported by North Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and Chiral_Drugs_CESPU_2017.

Author Contributions

João Ribeiro with the supervision of Carla Fernandes analyzed the references, evaluated the information relevant to the topic and wrote the paper Maria Elizabeth Tiritan helped in bibliographic research, evaluated the information relevant to the topic and reviewed the final version of the manuscript. Madalena M. M. Pinto contributed with discussion during the preparation of the manuscript and reviewed the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cavazzini, A.; Pasti, L.; Massi, A.; Marchetti, N.; Dondi, F. Recent applications in chiral high performance liquid chromatography: A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2011, 706, 205–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fernandes, C.; Phyo, Y.; Silva, A.S.; Tiritan, M.E.; Kijjoa, A.; Pinto, M.M.M. Chiral stationary phases based on small molecules: An update of the last seventeen years. Sep. Purif. Rev. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fernandes, C.; Tiritan, M.E.; Pinto, M. Small molecules as chromatographic tools for HPLC enantiomeric resolution: Pirkle-type chiral stationary phases evolution. Chromatographia 2013, 76, 871–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lämmerhofer, M. Chiral recognition by enantioselective liquid chromatography: Mechanisms and modern chiral stationary phases. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217, 814–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Morrison, R.T.; Boyd, R.N. Organic Chemistry, 6th ed.; Prentice-Hall International: London, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hesse, G.; Hagel, R. A complete separation of a racemic mixture by elution chromatography on cellulose triacetate. Chromatographia 1973, 6, 277–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Okamoto, Y.; Kawashima, M.; Hatada, K. Useful chiral packing materials for high-performance liquid chromatographic resolution of enantiomers: Phenylcarbamates of polysaccharides coated on silica gel. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 5357–5359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Witte, D.T.; Bruggeman, F.J.; Franke, J.P.; Copinga, S.; Jansen, J.M.; De Zeeuw, R.A. Comparison between cellulose and amylose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) chiral stationary phases for enantiomeric separation of 17 amidotetralins. Chirality 1993, 5, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Matlin, S.A.; Tiritan, M.E.; Crawford, A.J.; Cass, Q.B.; Boyd, D.R. HPLC with carbohydrate carbamate chiral phases: Influence of chiral phase structure on enantioselectivity. Chirality 1994, 6, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chankvetadze, B.; Yashima, E.; Okamoto, Y. Dimethyl-, dichloro- and chloromethylphenylcarbamates of amylose as chiral stationary phases for high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1995, 694, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Park, J.H.; Whang, Y.C.; Jung, Y.J.; Okamoto, Y.; Yamamoto, C.; Carr, P.W.; McNeff, C.V. Separation of racemic compounds on amylose and cellulose dimethylphenylcarbamate-coated zirconia in HPLC. J. Sep. Sci. 2003, 26, 1331–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shen, J.; Zhao, Y.; Inagaki, S.; Yamamoto, C.; Shen, Y.; Liu, S.; Okamoto, Y. Enantioseparation using ortho- or meta-substituted phenylcarbamates of amylose as chiral stationary phases for high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1286, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chankvetadze, B.; Yashima, E.; Okamoto, Y. Chloromethylphenylcarbamate derivatives of cellulose as chiral stationary phases for high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1994, 670, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kaida, Y.; Okamoto, Y. Optical resolution by high-performance liquid chromatography on benzylcarbamates of cellulose and amylose. J. Chromatogr. A 1993, 641, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cass, Q.B.; Tiritan, M.E.; Calafatti, S.A.; Matlin, S.A. Enantioseparation on amylose triso,5-dimethoxyphenyl carbamate): Application to commercial pharmaceutical chiral drugs. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 1999, 22, 3091–3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ichida, A.; Shibata, T.; Okamoto, I.; Yuki, Y.; Namikoshi, H.; Toga, Y. Resolution of enantiomers by HPLC on cellulose derivatives. Chromatographia 1984, 19, 280–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Castells, C.B.; Carr, P.W. Cellulose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate)-coated zirconia as a chiral stationary phase for HPLC. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 3013–3021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Castells, C.B.; Carr, P.W. Fast enantioseparations of basic analytes by high-performance liquid chromatography using cellulose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate)-coated zirconia stationary phases. J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 904, 17–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kasuya, N.; Kusaka, Y.; Habu, N.; Ohnishi, A. Development of chiral stationary phases consisting of low-molecular-weight cellulose derivatives covalently bonded to silica gel. Cellulose 2002, 9, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, X.; Zou, H.; Ni, J.; Feng, S. Synthesis and characteristics of composite chiral stationary phases based on cellulose derivatives. J. Sep. Sci. 2003, 26, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, Y.; Zou, H. High-performance liquid chromatographic evaluation of a coated cellulose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) chiral stationary phase having a small-pore silica support. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1178, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cass, Q.B.; Bassi, A.L.; Calafatti, S.A.; Matlin, S.A.; Tiritan, M.E.; de Campos, L.M.M. Carbohydrate carbamate coated onto microporous silica: Application to chiral analysis of commercial pharmaceutical drugs. Chirality 1996, 8, 143–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Matlin, S.A.; Tiritan, M.E.; Cass, Q.B.; Boyd, D.R. Enantiomeric resolution of chiral sulfoxides on polysaccharide phases by HPLC. Chirality 1996, 8, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yashima, E. Polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phases for high-performance liquid chromatographic enantioseparation. J. Chromatogr. A 2001, 906, 105–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ali, I.; Aboul-Enein, H.Y. Immobilized polysaccharide CSPs: An advancement in enantiomeric separations. Curr. Pharm. Anal. 2007, 3, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ikai, T.; Okamoto, Y. Structure control of polysaccharide derivatives for efficient separation of enantiomers by chromatography. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 6077–6101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Al-Othman, Z.A.; Ali, I.; Asim, M.; Khan, T.A. Recent trends in chiral separations on immobilized polysaccharides CSPs. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2012, 15, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chankvetadze, B. Recent developments on polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phases for liquid-phase separation of enantiomers. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1269, 26–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Chen, X.; Yamamoto, C.; Okamoto, Y. Polysaccharide derivatives as useful chiral stationary phases in high-performance liquid chromatography. Pure Appl. Chem. 2007, 79, 1561–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ali, I.; Saleem, K.; Hussain, I.; Gaitonde, V.D.; Aboul-Enein, H.Y. Polysaccharides chiral stationary phases in liquid chromatography. Sep. Purif. Rev. 2009, 38, 97–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Maier, N.M.; Franco, P.; Lindner, W. Separation of enantiomers: needs, challenges, perspectives. J. Chromatogr. A 2001, 906, 3–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ikai, T.; Yamamoto, C.; Kamigaito, M.; Okamoto, Y. Immobilized-type chiral packing materials for HPLC based on polysaccharide derivatives. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2008, 875, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Okamoto, Y.; Ikai, T. Chiral HPLC for efficient resolution of enantiomers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 2593–2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Shen, J.; Okamoto, Y. Efficient separation of enantiomers using stereoregular chiral polymers. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 1094–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Fanali, C.; Fanali, S.; Chankvetadze, B. HPLC separation of enantiomers of some flavanone derivatives using polysaccharide-based chiral selectors covalently immobilized on silica. Chromatographia 2016, 79, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Belboukhari, N.; Lahmar, N.; Sekkoum, K.; Cheriti, A.; Aboul-Enein, H.Y. Chiral separation of several flavanones by liquid chromatography. Curr. Pharm. Anal. 2015, 11, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. López-Ram-de-Víu, P.; Gálvez, J.A.; Díaz-de-Villegas, M.D. High-performance liquid chromatographic enantioseparation of unusual amino acid derivatives with axial chirality on polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phases. J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1390, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Albals, D.; Heyden, Y.V.; Schmid, M.G.; Chankvetadze, B.; Mangelings, D. Chiral separations of cathinone and amphetamine-derivatives: Comparative study between capillary electrochromatography, supercritical fluid chromatography and three liquid chromatographic modes. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2016, 121, 232–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ghanem, A.; Hoenen, H.; Müller, P.; Aboul-Enein, H.Y. Enantiomeric separation of cyclopropane derivatives on a polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phase. Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 538, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lipka, E.; Yous, S.; Furman, C.; Carato, P.; Deghaye, C.; Bonte, J.P.; Vaccher, C. Analytical and preparative chiral separation of β-carboline derivatives, LDL oxidation inhibitors, using HPLC and CE methodologies: Determination of enantiomeric purity. Chromatographia 2012, 75, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gallinella, B.; Ferretti, R.; Zanitti, L.; Sestili, I.; Mosca, A.; Cirilli, R. Comparison of reversed-phase enantioselective HPLC methods for determining the enantiomeric purity of (S)-omeprazole in the presence of its related substances. J. Pharm. Anal. 2016, 6, 132–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Okamoto, Y.; Kawashima, M.; Hatada, K. Chromatographic resolution: XI. Controlled chiral recognition of cellulose triphenylcarbamate derivatives supported on silica gel. J. Chromatogr. A 1986, 363, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Okamoto, Y.; Aburatani, R.; Miura, S.I.; Hatada, K. Chiral stationary phases for HPLC: Cellulose tris(3,5-dimethylphenyl-carbamate) and tris(3,5-dichlorophenylcarbamate) chemically bonded to silica gel. J. Liq. Chromatogr. 1987, 10, 1613–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Franco, P.; Senso, A.; Minguillón, C.; Oliveros, L. 3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamates of amylose, chitosan and cellulose bonded on silica gel comparison of their chiral recognition abilities as high-performance liquid chromatography chiral stationary phases. J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 796, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Francotte, E.; Huynh, D. Immobilized halogenophenylcarbamate derivatives of cellulose as novel stationary phases for enantioselective drug analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2002, 27, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jeuniaux, C. A brief survey of the early contribution of European scientists to chitin knowledge. In Advances in Chitin Sciences; Domard, A.J.C., Muzzarelli, R.A.A., Roberts, G., Eds.; Jacques André Publishers: Lyon, France, 1996; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  47. Khor, E. Chapter 1—The relevance of chitin. In Chitin; Elsevier Science Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  48. Rinaudo, M. Chitin and chitosan: Properties and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2006, 31, 603–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hou, J.; Yu, X.; Shen, Y.; Shi, Y.; Su, C.; Zhao, L. Triphenyl phosphine-functionalized chitosan nanoparticles enhanced antitumor efficiency through targeted delivery of doxorubicin to mitochondria. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kato, Y.; Onishi, H.; Machida, Y. Application of chitin and chitosan derivatives in the pharmaceutical field. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2003, 4, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Venkatesan, J.; Vinodhini, P.A.; Sudha, P.N.; Kim, S.K. Chitin and chitosan composites for bone tissue regeneration. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2014, 73, 59–81. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Krajewska, B. Application of chitin- and chitosan-based materials for enzyme immobilizations: A review. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2004, 35, 126–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cass, Q.B.; Bassi, A.L.; Matlin, S.A. Chiral discrimination by HPLC on aryl carbamate derivatives of chitin coated onto microporous aminopropyl silica. Chirality 1996, 8, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yamamoto, C.; Hayashi, T.; Okamoto, Y. High-performance liquid chromatographic enantioseparation using chitin carbamate derivatives as chiral stationary phases. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 1021, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yamamoto, C.; Hayashi, T.; Okamoto, Y.; Kobayashi, S. Enantioseparation by using chitin phenylcarbamates as chiral stationary phases for high-performance liquid chromatography. Chem. Lett. 2000, 29, 12–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, J.; Wang, Z.Q.; Wang, X.C.; Zhang, J.J.; Bai, Z.W.; Chen, W. Enantioseparation characteristics of tadalafil and its intermediate on chitin derived chiral stationary phases. Analyst 2015, 140, 5593–5600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Wang, X.C.; Zhang, J.; Xu, X.Q.; Chen, W.; Yang, Y.G.; Bai, Z.W. Enantioseparation characteristics of chiral stationary phases based on the derivatives of cellulose and chitin. Anal. Methods 2015, 7, 2786–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, J.; Wang, Z.Q.; Chen, W.; Bai, Z.W. Preparation and enantioseparation of biselector chiral stationary phases based on amylose and chitin derivatives. Anal. Sci. 2015, 31, 1091–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Zhang, L.; Shen, J.; Zuo, W.; Okamoto, Y. Synthesis of chitosan 3,6-diphenylcarbamate-2-urea derivatives and their applications as chiral stationary phases for high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1365, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Okamoto, Y.; Noguchi, J.; Yashima, E. Enantioseparation on 3,5-dichloro- and 3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamates of polysaccharides as chiral stationary phases for high-performance liquid chromatography. Reac. Func. Polym. 1998, 37, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Senso, A.; Oliveros, L.; Minguillón, C. Chitosan derivatives as chiral selectors bonded on allyl silica gel: Preparation, characterisation and study of the resulting high-performance liquid chromatography chiral stationary phases. J. Chromatogr. A 1999, 839, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yamamoto, C.; Fujisawa, M.; Kamigaito, M.; Okamoto, Y. Enantioseparation using urea- and imide-bearing chitosan phenylcarbamate derivatives as chiral stationary phases for high-performance liquid chromatography. Chirality 2008, 20, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Guntari, S.N.; Nam, E.; Pranata, N.N.; Chia, K.; Wong, E.H.H.; Blencowe, A.; Goh, T.K.; Caruso, F.; Qiao, G.G. Fabrication of chiral stationary phases via continuous assembly of polymers for resolution of enantiomers by liquid chromatography. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2014, 299, 1285–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Han, X.; An, L.; Cui, H.; Li, H.; Liu, W. Enantioseparation using chitosan tris(3-chlorophenylcarbamate) as a chiral stationary phase for HPLC. Chromatographia 2011, 73, 1043–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Son, S.H.; Jegal, J. Synthesis and characterization of the chiral stationary phase based on Chitosan. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 106, 2989–2996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tang, S.; Bin, Q.; Chen, W.; Bai, Z.W.; Huang, S.H. Chiral stationary phases based on chitosan bis(methylphenylcarbamate)-(isobutyrylamide) for high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1440, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Tang, S.; Bin, Q.; Feng, Z.-W.; Chen, W.; Huang, S.-H.; Bai, Z.-W. Chitosan bis(halophenylcarbamate)-(isobutyrylamide) based chiral stationary phases for enantiomeric separation. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 9657–9665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Feng, Z.W.; Chen, W.; Bai, Z.W. Chiral stationary phases based on chitosan bis(4-methylphenylcarbamate)-(alkoxyformamide). J. Sep. Sci. 2016, 39, 3728–3735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Tang, S.; Liu, J.D.; Bin, Q.; Fu, K.Q.; Wang, X.C.; Luo, Y.B.; Huang, S.H.; Bai, Z.W. N-Acylated chitosan bis(arylcarbamate)s: A class of promising chiral separation materials with powerful enantioseparation capability and high eluents tolerability. J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1476, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Zhang, J.; Wang, X.-C.; Chen, W.; Bai, Z.-W. Synthesis of substituted phenylcarbamates of N-cyclobutylformylated chitosan and their application as chiral selectors in enantioseparation. Analyst 2016, 141, 4470–4480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Feng, Z.W.; Qiu, G.S.; Mei, X.M.; Liang, S.; Yang, F.; Huang, S.H.; Chen, W.; Bai, Z.W. Structural dependence on the property of chiral stationary phases derived from chitosan bis(arylcarbamate)-(amide)s. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 168, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wang, J.; Huang, S.H.; Chen, W.; Bai, Z.W. Eluent tolerance and enantioseparation recovery of chiral packing materials based on chitosan Bis(Phenylcarbamate)-(n-Octyl Urea)s for high performance liquid chromatography. Molecules 2016, 21, 1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Wang, J.; Xi, J.-B.; Chen, W.; Huang, S.-H.; Bai, Z.-W. High performance chiral separation materials based on chitosan bis(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate)-(alkyl urea)s. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 156, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Liang, S.; Huang, S.-H.; Chen, W.; Bai, Z.-W. High-performance chiral stationary phases based on chitosan derivatives with a branched-chain alkyl urea. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Liu, Y.; Zou, H.; Haginaka, J. Preparation and evaluation of a novel chiral stationary phase based on covalently bonded chitosan for ligand-exchange chromatography. J. Sep. Sci. 2006, 29, 1440–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Structures of different types of polysaccharides studied as selectors for liquid chromatography (LC).
Figure 1. Structures of different types of polysaccharides studied as selectors for liquid chromatography (LC).
Symmetry 09 00190 g001
Figure 2. Structures of amylose 3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate (ADMPC) and cellulose 3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate (CDMPC).
Figure 2. Structures of amylose 3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate (ADMPC) and cellulose 3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate (CDMPC).
Symmetry 09 00190 g002
Figure 3. Chemical structures of the analytes A1A40 separated in chitin and chitosan based CSPs.
Figure 3. Chemical structures of the analytes A1A40 separated in chitin and chitosan based CSPs.
Symmetry 09 00190 g003
Figure 4. Chemical structures of the analytes A41A73 separated in chitin and chitosan based CSPs.
Figure 4. Chemical structures of the analytes A41A73 separated in chitin and chitosan based CSPs.
Symmetry 09 00190 g004
Figure 5. Structure of chitosan amine-derived CSP.
Figure 5. Structure of chitosan amine-derived CSP.
Symmetry 09 00190 g005
Table 1. Chitin-based chiral stationary phases (CSPs).
Table 1. Chitin-based chiral stationary phases (CSPs).
Symmetry 09 00190 i001
RSeparated AnalytesαSeparated AnalytesαREF.
Symmetry 09 00190 i002
1
A21.80 AA161.17 A[53,54,55]
A101.20 AA321.50 A
A111.18 AA331.20 A
A151.24 AA521.23 B
Symmetry 09 00190 i003
2
A11.62 DA231.20 A[53,54,55,57]
A22.04 DA271.25 A
A41.08 AA283.50 A
A71.40 FA311.30 A
A91.17 DA322.00 A
A101.15 EA331.30 A
A111.27 DA341.07 A
A121.24 EA371.30 A
A151.36 CA381.25 A
A161.25 AA391.70 A
A171.30 AA401.04 A
A221.19 AA521.41 B
Symmetry 09 00190 i004
3
A11.68 EA121.24 E[54,55]
A21.39 AA151.17 A
A71.35 FA161.10 C
A91.19 CA171.34 A
A101.33 AA521.72 B
A111.86 E
Symmetry 09 00190 i005
4
A21.07 AA151.25 A[55]
A101.12 AA161.13 A
A121.34 AA171.26 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i006
5
A21.12 AA151.28 A
A91.39 AA161.22 A
A101.19 AA171.15 A
A111.13 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i007
6
A21.73 AA151.21 A
A121.38 AA171.06 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i008
7
A151.11 AA171.68 A
A101.05 AA121.36 A
A21.10 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i009
8
A21.35 AA111.33 A
A91.13 AA151.35 A
A101.10 AA161.24 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i010
9
A21.39 AA111.24 A
A91.18 AA151.29 A
A101.02 AA161.08 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i011
10
A21.53 AA151.13 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i012
11
A11.28 AA111.14 A
A21.22 AA121.55 A
A71.09 AA151.15 A
A91.13 AA171.03 A
A101.24 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i013
12
A11.22 AA101.20 A[55]
A21.23 AA111.07 A
A71.13 AA121.62 A
A91.44 AA171.19 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i014
13
No Separation[55]
Symmetry 09 00190 i015
14
Symmetry 09 00190 i016
15
A151.09 AA171.29 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i017
16
A151.03 AA171.24 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i018
17 (S)
A101.14 AA171.16 A
A161.44 A--
Symmetry 09 00190 i019
17 (R)
A91.25 AA151.20 A
A121.29 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i020
18
A11.35 AA411.68 G[56,58]
A21.34 GA422.58 G
A41.29 GA431.36 G
A71.17 AA441.18 E
A101.05 AA462.08 E
A182.92 GA471.13 E
A191.38 GA485.88 G
A271.36 EA491.01 A
A341.98 GA561.13 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i021
19
A483.40 G- [56]
Symmetry 09 00190 i022
20
A483.97 G
A—Hex/2-PrOH (90:10 v/v); B—Hex/2-PrOH/CF3COOH (95:5:1 v/v/v); C—Hex/CHCl3/2-PrOH (90:10:1 v/v/v); D—Hex/CHCl3 (90:10 v/v); E—Hex/AcOEt/2-PrOH (90:10:1 v/v/v); F—MeOH/H2O (75:25 v/v); G—Hex/EtOH (90:10 v/v). Hex—n-Hexane; 2-PrOH—2-Propanol; EtOH—Ethanol; MeOH—Methanol; AcOEt—Ethyl acetate.
Table 2. Chitosan tris-carbamate CSPs.
Table 2. Chitosan tris-carbamate CSPs.
Symmetry 09 00190 i023
RSeparated AnalytesαSeparated AnalytesαREF.
Symmetry 09 00190 i024
21
A21.29 AA162.25 A[7,59]
A71.42 AA451.15 A
A101.16 AA511.10 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i025
22
A11.08 AA121.14 A[59,60,61,62]
A21.23 AA161.29 A
A71.05 AA171.20 A
A91.20 AA452.73 A
A101.90 AA471.08 A
A111.06 AA511.11 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i026
22i
A71.20 DA571.12 A[61]
A101.10 AA581.22 A
A131.22 AA591.09 A
A321.23 DA601.27 A
A441.06 DA611.07 A
A471.03 DA621.15 D
A501.25 AA631.19 D
Symmetry 09 00190 i027
23
A11.51 AA121.80 A[59,60,62]
A21.60 AA151.14 A
A71.54 AA161.78 A
A91.51 AA171.24 A
A101.59 AA471.13 A
A111.25 AA511.34 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i028
23i
A11.10 HA591.80 H[44,63]
A71.14 HA601.33 H
A101.19 HA611.80 H
A131.33 HA621.57 H
A161.51 HA631.25 H
A321.12 HA651.10 H
A471.23 HA681.41 H
A571.14 HA701.30 H
A581.06 H
Symmetry 09 00190 i029
24
A21.37 AA451.50 A[59]
A101.37 AA511.11 A
A161.20 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i030
24i
A71.18 EA581.12 G[61]
A321.27 EA591.19 E
A471.11 EA611.32 E
A501.22 EA621.09 F
Symmetry 09 00190 i031
25
A11.22 AA161.28 A[59,61]
A21.22 AA171.09 A
A71.34 AA451.75 A
A101.42 AA471.13 A
A111.30 AA511.10 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i032
25i
A71.25 EA501.31 E[61]
A101.29 FA591.13 E
A132.26 EA611.19 E
A321.27 EA631.15 E
A441.31 E
Symmetry 09 00190 i033
26
A11.37 AA171.13 A[59,62,64]
A21.21 AA511.12 A
A71.33 AA661.13 A
A91.23 AA671.52 A
A101.42 AA691.08 A
A111.19 AA711.39 A
A151.09 AA721.17 A
A161.15 AA731.08 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i034
27
A11.12 AA111.14 A[62]
A21.12 AA121.26 A
A71.43 AA161.27 A
A91.31 AA171.05 A
A101.13 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i035
28
A11.09 AA161.26 A[59,62]
A21.32 AA171.14 A
A71.38 AA451.46 A
A91.30 AA471.12 A
A101.36 AA511.08 A
A111.28 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i036
29
A11.39 AA111.21 A[59]
A21.15 AA161.25 A
A101.08 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i037
30
A11.59 AA111.19 A
A21.50 AA451.29 A
A71.29 AA511.09 A
A101.35 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i038
31 *
A101.20 AA171.18 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i039
32 *
No separation
Symmetry 09 00190 i040
33
Symmetry 09 00190 i041
34
A71.27 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i042
35
A21.36 AA161.35 A
A71.33 AA451.40 A
A101.37 AA511.20 A
A—Hex/2-PrOH (90:10 v/v); B—Hex/2-PrOH/CF3COOH (95:5:1 v/v/v); C—Hex/CHCl3/2-PrOH (90:10:1 v/v/v); D—Hep/CHCl3 (75:25 v/v); E—Hex/AcOEt/2-PrOH (90:10:1 v/v/v); F—MeOH/H2O (75:25 v/v); G—Hex/EtOH (90:10 v/v); H—Hep/2-PrOH (90:10 or 80:20 v/v). All chitosan tris-carbamate derivatives were coated with THF on APS, except * (coated with DMSO), and 22i–25i (immobilized on allyl silica gel). APS—Aminopropyl silica; THF—Tetrahydrofuran; DMSO—Dimethylsulfoxide; Hex—n-Hexane; Hep—Heptane; 2-PrOH—2-Propanol; EtOH—Ethanol; EtOAc—Ethyl Acetate.
Table 3. Chitosan bis-carbamate CSP with the amine group of the chitosan modified by N-nicotinoyl-l-phenylalanine.
Table 3. Chitosan bis-carbamate CSP with the amine group of the chitosan modified by N-nicotinoyl-l-phenylalanine.
Symmetry 09 00190 i043
StructureSeparated AnalytesαSeparated AnalytesαRef.
Symmetry 09 00190 i044
36
A11.54 BA102.05 D[65]
A24.70 CA112.19 A
A74.28 AA122.76 E
A81.21 AA131.95 E
A91.72 DA142.02 E
A—Hex/2-PrOH (60:40 v/v); B—Hex/2-PrOH (75:25 v/v); C—Hex/2-PrOH (80:20 v/v); D—Hex/2-PrOH/TFA (95:5:0.2 v/v/v); E—Hex/CHCl3 (25:75 v/v). Coated with THF on APS. APS—Aminopropyl silica; THF—Tetrahydrofuran; DMSO—Dimethylsulfoxide; Hex—n-Hexane; 2-PrOH—2-Propanol; TFA—Trifluoroacetic acid.
Table 4. Chitosan bis-carbamate CSPs with the amine group of the chitosan replaced by an imide moiety.
Table 4. Chitosan bis-carbamate CSPs with the amine group of the chitosan replaced by an imide moiety.
Symmetry 09 00190 i045
StructureSeparated AnalytesαSeparated AnalytesαRef.
Symmetry 09 00190 i046
R1 = H
37
A11.23A111.12[62]
A21.27A151.27
A91.19A161.12
Symmetry 09 00190 i047
R1 = CH3
38
A21.30A171.07[62]
A151.37
Symmetry 09 00190 i048
R1 = Cl
39
A11.15A101.07
A21.25A111.25
A91.08A151.13
Symmetry 09 00190 i049
R1 = H
40 *
A11.22A111.44
A21.11A121.78
A101.26A171.11
Symmetry 09 00190 i050
R1 = CH3
41 *
A11.28A101.17
A21.20A111.84
A71.20A121.38
A91.12A171.09
Symmetry 09 00190 i051
R1 = Cl
42 *
A11.23A101.57
A21.11A111.42
A71.10A121.53
A91.26A151.14
Symmetry 09 00190 i052
R1 = H
43
A11.09A111.54
A21.05A121.71
A71.15A151.18
A101.08
Symmetry 09 00190 i053
R1 = CH3

44 **
A11.18A111.45
A21.05A121.78
A73.26A151.07
A101.14
Symmetry 09 00190 i054
R1 = Cl
45 **
A11.17A111.42
A21.10A121.63
A101.12A151.09
Coated with THF on APS, except * (DMSO), and ** (DMF). Hex/2-PrOH (90:10 v/v), 0.5 mL/min. APS—Aminopropyl silica; THF—Tetrahydrofuran; DMSO—Dimethylsulfoxide; DMF—Dimethylformamide; Hex—n-Hexane; 2-PrOH—2-Propanol.
Table 5. Chitosan bis-carbamate CSPs with the amine moiety of chitosan modified by an alkylamide moiety.
Table 5. Chitosan bis-carbamate CSPs with the amine moiety of chitosan modified by an alkylamide moiety.
Symmetry 09 00190 i055
StructureSeparated AnalytesαSeparated AnalytesαREF.
Symmetry 09 00190 i056
R1 = CH(CH3)2
46
A11.36 BA201.16 A[66,68]
A21.29 BA211.28 A
A31.07 BA221.17 A
A41.22 BA231.12 C
A51.12 AA241.10 A
A61.31 BA251.11 A
A101.08 AA261.26 A
A181.30 BA271.05 A
A191.26 BA282.64 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i057
R1 = CH(CH3)2
47
A11.40 AA211.42 A[66]
A21.36 AA221.21 A
A31.06 BA231.20 B
A41.15 AA241.23 A
A51.08 AA251.17 A
A61.44 AA261.52 A
A101.11 CA271.19 A
A181.34 AA361.05 A
A191.53 AA283.28 A
A201.15 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i058
R1 = CH(CH3)2
48
A11.24 BA211.59 A
A21.47 AA221.08 A
A31.09 CA231.05 A
A41.31 CA241.16 A
A51.18 CA251.13 A
A61.22 CA261.09 A
A101.05 CA271.29 C
A181.90 AA284.32 A
A191.73 AA361.22 A
A201.20 AA201.25 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i059
R1 = CH(CH3)2
49
A11.46 A
A21.26 CA211.36 B
A31.06 BA221.14 C
A41.23 CA231.13 C
A51.12 AA251.05 A
A101.08 CA261.16 B
A181.54 AA271.14 B
A191.24 AA281.59 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i060
R1 = CH(CH3)2
50
A11.54 AA211.45 A[66,69]
A21.35 CA221.19 C
A31.03 BA231.19 C
A41.23 CA241.15 A
A51.12 AA251.15 A
A61.20 AA261.20 B
A101.10 CA271.16 B
A181.57 AA282.12 A
A191.35 AA361.15 B
A201.20 B
Symmetry 09 00190 i061
R1 = CH(CH3)2
51
A11.14 BA251.09 C[66]
A21.08 BA261.24 B
A51.05 AA271.10 C
A61.32 AA283.57 A
A101.14 B
Symmetry 09 00190 i062
R1 = CH(CH3)2
52
A11.15 BA211.45 A[67]
A21.25 AA221.45 B
A31.14 CA231.45 B
A41.14 AA241.38 A
A51.11 CA251.04 A
A61.25 BA261.20 C
A101.06 AA271.14 B
A181.74 AA282.17 A
A191.22 AA361.11 A
A201.07 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i063
R1 = CH(CH3)2
53
A11.12 BA201.45 A[67]
A21.24 AA211.42 A
A41.24 AA251.14 B
A61.09 BA271.16 B
A101.39 AA282.40 A
A181.39 AA361.14 A
A191.56 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i064
R1 = CH(CH3)2
54
A11.53 AA201.31 A
A21.36 AA211.56 A
A31.05 AA221.11 B
A41.44 AA231.12 B
A51.18 AA241.05 A
A61.22 BA271.14 C
A101.14 CA281.81 B
A181.74 AA361.27 A
A191.53 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i065
R1 = CH(CH3)2
55
A11.53 AA201.56 A
A21.17 AA211.25 A
A41.29 BA221.10 C
A61.29 AA231.10 C
A101.15 AA271.11 B
A181.50 AA281.61 A
A191.12 BA361.26 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i066
R1 = CH(CH3)2
56
A11.21 AA201.20 A
A21.28 AA211.17 A
A41.34 AA221.15 A
A61.14 CA231.15 A
A101.24 BA271.55 B
A181.15 AA282.26 A
A191.21 B
Symmetry 09 00190 i067
R1 = CH(CH3)2
57
A11.30 CA211.34 A
A21.50 BA221.13 C
A41.83 BA231.13 C
A61.11 AA251.15 A
A101.27 CA261.17 A
A181.19 AA271.19 A
A191.36 BA282.94 A
A201.07 AA361.07 C
Symmetry 09 00190 i068
R1 = C3H5
58
A11.30 BA231.11 B[69]
A21.71 BA241.06 A
A41.14 AA251.48 A
A51.05 AA261.09 B
A61.32 CA271.11 B
A101.16 BA283.15 A
A182.09 AA361.14 A
A191.55 AA491.06 A
A201.27 AA541.07 A
A212.02 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i069
R1 = C5H9
59
A11.69 CA231.15 B
A21.45 BA241.08 A
A41.34 CA251.10 C
A61.53 BA261.07 C
A101.26 AA281.63 B
A182.43 AA361.27 A
A191.47 BA491.07 A
A201.35 AA541.06 A
A212.28 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i070
R1 = (CH2)2CH3
60
A11.90 AA212.11 B
A21.67 AA231.10 C
A41.35 BA241.28 A
A61.54 AA251.14 A
A101.08 BA261.15 B
A182.24 AA271.25 C
A191.66 AA283.03 C
A201.46 AA491.34 B
Symmetry 09 00190 i071
R1 = (CH2)4CH3
61
A11.54 BA213.47 A
A21.45 AA241.11 C
A41.19 CA251.14 A
A61.28 AA261.16 B
A101.04 CA271.44 B
A182.42 AA283.57 B
A191.10 CA361.13 C
A201.47 AA491.34 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i072
R1 = CH2CH3
62
A11.09 AA271.16 C[68]
A21.29 BA281.24 C
A41.14 CA291.11 A
A101.12 BA381.58 B
A191.48 AA471.13 A
A211.04 CA551.18 A
A251.58 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i073
R1 = CH2(CH2)3CH3
63
A21.21 AA211.32 A
A41.14 AA251.12 A
A181.52 AA281.91 A
A191.10 AA301.21 A
A201.14 AA471.07 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i074
R1 = CH2C6H5
64
A21.15 AA201.17 A
A41.05 AA211.18 A
A61.07 AA271.09 A
A101.09 AA281.36 A
A181.31 AA291.06 A
A191.20 BA301.20 B
Symmetry 09 00190 i075
R1 = C4H7
65
A11.25 BA201.16 A[70]
A21.36 BA211.37 A
A31.09 BA221.15 C
A41.29 AA251.13 A
A61.99 AA261.18 C
A101.10 AA271.02 C
A181.37 AA283.91 B
A191.47 AA491.12 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i076
R1 = C4H7
66
A11.56 BA212.03 A
A21.41 AA221.13 C
A31.11 AA241.14 A
A41.45 BA251.07 C
A61.35 BA261.22 C
A101.16 CA271.11 C
A181.77 AA284.51 B
A191.84 AA361.19 A
A201.28 AA491.28 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i077
R1 = C4H7
67
A11.53 BA211.90 A
A21.53 CA221.12 C
A31.09 AA251.22 A
A41.66 AA261.08 C
A61.37 BA271.08 C
A101.10 AA283.46 B
A181.62 AA361.18 A
A191.61 AA491.21 A
A201.13 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i078
R1 = C4H7
68
A21.57 AA241.27 A
A41.11 BA251.09 A
A61.41 BA261.18 B
A101.26 BA271.12 C
A181.21 AA288.64 B
A191.76 AA361.17 A
A211.37 AA491.42 C
A221.21 B
Symmetry 09 00190 i079
R1 = C4H7
69
A11.44 BA221.24 C
A21.41 AA241.17 A
A41.33 AA251.11 A
A61.74 AA261.13 B
A101.05 AA271.24 A
A181.45 AA283.78 B
A191.60 AA361.07 B
A201.26 BA491.28 A
A211.85 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i080
R1 = C4H7
70
A11.31 BA211.46 A
A21.31 BA221.21 B
A41.32 AA261.04 B
A61.48 AA271.09 B
A181.42 AA282.68 B
A191.35 AA361.11 C
A201.23 AA491.20 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i081
R1 = C4H7
71
A11.22 BA241.08 A
A21.18 BA261.03 A
A41.13 AA271.18 A
A61.29 BA283.16 A
A181.26 AA361.05 A
A191.29 AA491.07 A
A211.25 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i082
R1 = (CH2)3CH3
72
A11.64 CA241.33 A[71]
A21.71 CA251.08 A
A41.11 CA271.52 B
A61.50 BA284.53 C
A101.12 AA291.07 B
A181.23 AA301.20 B
A191.58 AA472.70 B
A201.09 BA541.04 A
A211.74 B
Symmetry 09 00190 i083
R1 = (CH2)3CH3
73
A12.15 CA211.18 C
A21.66 AA251.18 C
A41.21 CA271.40 B
A61.08 BA284.12 A
A101.25 AA292.01 A
A183.14 AA301.19 B
A191.66 AA471.84 B
A201.35 B
Symmetry 09 00190 i084
R1 = (CH2)3CH3
74
A11.44 CA211.97 A
A21.68 AA241.20 A
A41.37 AA251.13 A
A51.06 AA271.24 B
A101.15 AA284.31 B
A181.80 AA291.15 B
A191.81 AA301.13 B
A201.22 AA471.37 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i085
R1 = (CH2)3CH3
75
A12.07 CA212.09 A
A21.41 AA241.06 A
A41.16 BA251.52 C
A61.36 AA271.28 B
A101.67 AA283.52 B
A181.89 AA291.08 B
A191.57 AA301.24 B
A201.09 AA473.28 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i086
R1 = (CH2)3CH3
76a
A11.51 CA211.68 A
A21.61 BA241.34 A
A41.09 CA251.10 A
A61.50 BA271.40 B
A101.07 BA284.10 C
A181.26 AA301.17 A
A191.54 AA471.87 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i087
R1 = (CH2)3CH3
76b
A11.49 CA241.53 A
A21.47 AA253.55 C
A41.21 CA271.68 A
A61.23 BA281.99 A
A101.07 CA291.30 A
A181.96 BA306.71 C
A192.23 CA471.30 A
A201.31 AA551.10 A
A211.10 A
A—Hex/2-PrOH (90:10 v/v); B—Hex/EtOH (90:10 v/v); C—Hex/2-EtOH/MeOH (90:5:5 v/v/v), 1.0 mL/min. Coated with DMF on APS. APS—Aminopropyl silica; DMF—Dimethylformamide; Hex—n-Hexane; 2-PrOH—2-Propanol; EtOH—Ethanol; MeOH—Methanol; a—CSPs prepared with higher molecular weight chitosan; b—CSPs prepared with lower molecular weight chitosan.
Table 6. Chitosan bis-carbamate CSPs with the amine moiety of chitosan modified by an N-alkyl urea.
Table 6. Chitosan bis-carbamate CSPs with the amine moiety of chitosan modified by an N-alkyl urea.
Symmetry 09 00190 i088
StructureSeparated AnalytesαSeparated AnalytesαREF.
Symmetry 09 00190 i089
R1 = (CH2)7CH3
77
A11.39 CA211.11 A[72]
A21.72 BA241.90 A
A41.27 AA251.12 C
A62.24 BA271.16 A
A101.26 CA283.25 B
A181.11 AA291.34 B
A191.26 AA471.39 A
A201.35 AA531.15 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i090
R1 = (CH2)7CH3
78
A11.77 AA212.61 B
A21.36 AA241.24 A
A41.19 AA251.22 C
A61.28 BA271.39 A
A101.08 AA283.15 A
A182.38 BA292.16 A
A191.17 AA471.61 B
A202.42 AA531.16 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i091
R1 = (CH2)7CH3
79
A11.75 AA241.06 A
A21.42 AA251.07 C
A41.20 AA271.30 B
A61.15 AA282.54 A
A101.14 AA291.54 A
A182.94 AA471.40 B
A191.08 AA531.03 A
A201.52 AA551.26 A
A213.09 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i092
R1 = (CH2)7CH3
80
A11.53 AA241.07 A
A21.28 AA251.40 B
A41.11 AA271.32 B
A61.23 AA283.83 A
A101.04 AA291.25 A
A182.60 AA301.56 A
A191.20 CA472.00 B
A201.19 AA551.05 C
A212.90 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i093
R1 = (CH2)7CH3
81
A11.37 BA213.58 A
A21.29 AA241.15 A
A41.20 AA251.98 B
A61.15 AA271.48 B
A101.31 AA285.83 B
A182.89 AA291.46 A
A191.43 AA301.16 C
A201.34 AA472.16 B
Symmetry 09 00190 i094
R1 = (CH2)7CH3
82
A11.60 AA213.79 A
A21.48 AA241.16 A
A41.29 AA271.42 B
A61.23 AA281.95 A
A101.31 CA292.08 A
A183.72 AA471.46 B
A201.76 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i095
R1 = (CH2)7CH3
83
A12.42 BA211.97 A[73]
A21.48 AA231.30 C
A41.12 BA241.30 A
A61.75 BA251.10 A
A101.19 BA261.17 C
A181.73 AA271.35 A
A191.32 AA286.98 B
A201.05 AA361.20 B
Symmetry 09 00190 i096
R1 = CH2C6H5
84
A11.38 BA211.44 A
A21.50 AA231.08 B
A41.04 BA241.31 A
A69.61 BA251.18 A
A101.13 BA261.28 C
A181.17 AA271.28 A
A191.18 BA283.30 A
A201.18 AA361.19 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i097
R1 = (CH2)3CH3
85
A11.26 CA211.16 A
A21.12 BA231.34 B
A41.48 AA241.09 B
A61.06 BA251.30 A
A101.05 AA264.27 A
A181.48 AA271.71 B
A191.21 AA281.40 A
A201.19 AA361.19 B
Symmetry 09 00190 i098
R1 = (CH2)11CH3
86
A11.32 BA231.19 A
A21.41 AA241.34 A
A51.05 CA251.21 A
A61.54 BA261.28 C
A101.14 BA271.30 A
A181.52 AA283.38 A
A191.16 BA361.26 A
A211.93 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i099
R1 = C6H11
87
A11.33 AA211.28 A
A21.47 AA231.22 A
A41.05 AA241.16 B
A51.05 BA251.32 A
A61.47 BA261.11 C
A101.22 AA271.17 A
A181.25 BA282.89 B
A191.22 BA361.15 A
A201.12 AA541.11 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i100
R1 = CH2CH(CH3)2
88a
A12.47 BA241.22 A[74]
A21.49 BA251.15 A
A41.08 BA271.36 A
A61.34 BA283.30 A
A101.06 BA301.19 B
A181.53 BA471.50 B
A191.17 AA531.06 A
A211.76 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i101
R1 = CH2CH(CH3)2
88b
A11.21 BA241.99 A
A21.63 AA251.33 C
A41.09 BA271.29 A
A61.37 CA287.45 B
A101.12 AA291.30 A
A181.10 BA471.37 B
A191.28 AA531.22 A
A201.16 AA541.09 A
A211.37 AA551.15 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i102
R1 = CH2CH(CH3)2
89a
A11.53 AA241.47 A
A21.66 BA251.08 C
A41.23 BA271.12 A
A61.63 BA283.61 B
A181.78 AA471.37 A
A191.32 AA531.13 A
A101.19 CA291.09 A
A211.78 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i103
R1 = CH2CH(CH3)2
89b
A11.79 AA241.27 A
A21.58 AA251.10 A
A41.19 AA271.16 A
A61.45 BA283.31 A
A101.13 AA291.07 B
A182.24 AA301.05 B
A191.21 AA471.15 A
A201.17 AA531.07 A
A212.04 AA541.04 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i104
R1 = CH2CH(CH3)2
90a
A11.40 BA244.09 C
A21.58 BA251.18 C
A41.19 BA271.38 A
A51.02 AA286.17 B
A61.31 BA291.47 A
A101.19 CA471.60 B
A181.57 AA531.21 A
A191.26 AA541.03 A
A201.15 AA551.04 A
A212.00 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i105
R1 = CH2CH(CH3)2
90b
A11.53 AA211.59 B
A21.68 AA241.63 A
A41.24 BA251.09 C
A51.27 AA271.12 B
A61.59 BA283.83 B
A101.31 BA291.16 A
A181.54 AA471.24 A
A191.27 AA531.10 A
A201.03 AA541.03 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i106
R1 = CH2CH(CH3)2
91a
A12.16 AA213.37 A
A21.41 AA241.38 A
A41.25 AA251.32 C
A51.27 AA271.40 B
A61.18 CA283.63 B
A101.30 CA291.62 A
A182.91 AA301.10 A
A191.38 AA471.54 B
A201.64 AA531.10 A
Symmetry 09 00190 i107
R1 = CH2CH(CH3)2
91b
A12.19 BA241.36 A
A21.50 AA251.35 C
A41.21 AA271.36 B
A51.81 AA283.71 A
A61.17 BA291.33 A
A101.24 CA301.09 A
A183.12 AA471.70 B
A191.32 AA531.08 A
A201.45 AA541.02 A
A213.24 AA551.05 C
A—Hex/2-PrOH (90:10 v/v); B—Hex/EtOH (90:10 v/v); C—Hex/2-EtOH/MeOH (90:5:5 v/v/v), 1.0 mL/min. Coated with DMF on APS. APS—Aminopropyl silica; DMF—Dimethylformamide; Hex—n-Hexane; 2-PrOH—2-Propanol; EtOH—Ethanol; MeOH—Methanol; a—CSPs developed with higher Molecular weight chitosan; b—CSPs developed with lower Molecular weight chitosan.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ribeiro, J.; Tiritan, M.E.; Pinto, M.M.M.; Fernandes, C. Chiral Stationary Phases for Liquid Chromatography Based on Chitin- and Chitosan-Derived Marine Polysaccharides. Symmetry 2017, 9, 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9090190

AMA Style

Ribeiro J, Tiritan ME, Pinto MMM, Fernandes C. Chiral Stationary Phases for Liquid Chromatography Based on Chitin- and Chitosan-Derived Marine Polysaccharides. Symmetry. 2017; 9(9):190. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9090190

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ribeiro, João, Maria Elizabeth Tiritan, Madalena M.M. Pinto, and Carla Fernandes. 2017. "Chiral Stationary Phases for Liquid Chromatography Based on Chitin- and Chitosan-Derived Marine Polysaccharides" Symmetry 9, no. 9: 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9090190

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop