Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Searching for Axion-Like Particles with X-ray Polarimeters
Previous Article in Journal
Applying MOG to Lensing: Einstein Rings, Abell 520 and the Bullet Cluster
Previous Article in Special Issue
Future X-ray Polarimetry of Relativistic Accelerators: Pulsar Wind Nebulae and Supernova Remnants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hot Coronae in Local AGN: Present Status and Future Perspectives

1
Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Università degli Studi Roma Tre, via della Vasca Navale 84, 00146 Rome, Italy
2
Astronomical Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-14100 Prague, Czech Republic
3
INAF/Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologie Spaziali, Via Fosso del Cavaliere, I-00133 Roma, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Galaxies 2018, 6(2), 44; https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies6020044
Submission received: 2 February 2018 / Revised: 19 March 2018 / Accepted: 19 March 2018 / Published: 4 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Bright Future of Astronomical X-ray Polarimetry)

Abstract

:
The nuclear X-ray emission in radio-quiet Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) is commonly believed to be due to inverse Compton scattering of soft UV photons in a hot corona. The radiation is expected to be polarized, the polarization degree depending mainly on the geometry and optical depth of the corona. Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR) observations are providing for the first time high quality measurements of the coronal physical parameters—temperature and optical depth. We hereby review the NuSTAR results on the coronal physical parameters (temperature and optical depth) and discuss their implications for future X-ray polarimetric studies.

1. Introduction

Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) represent the perfect astrophysical laboratory to study accretion processes. The great luminosities observed in these objects are due to the efficient conversion of gravitational energy into radiation in an accretion disk surrounding the central supermassive black hole (SMBH). The common paradigm for the geometry of the innermost regions around the central black hole postulates also the presence of a hot corona (the so called two phase model [1,2]). In this scenario, the UV radiation from the accretion disk (emitted as a multi-temperature black body spectrum) is Compton scattered by the hot electrons in the corona, up to X-ray wavelengths. In general, the primary emission of Seyfert galaxies sources can be well approximated as a cutoff power law with a photon index Γ = 1.7–2.0 and a high energy rollover at E c = 50–300 keV [3] which strongly depend on the physical properties of the scattering corona, i.e., the optical depth τ and the electron temperature kT e [4]. Nonetheless, the reprocessing of the nuclear radiation of the AGN from the circumnuclear environment makes the measurement of the slope of the continuum and of the cutoff energy degenerate with other physical parameters, like the amount of radiation reflected by circumnuclear matter, which produces a Compton hump at ∼30 keV [5,6]. A broad spectral coverage, from 0.5 up to ∼100 keV is therefore fundamental to discriminate between the different components of an X-ray spectrum, and to measure the parameters of the intrinsic nuclear emission. In this context, the Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR). has played a very important role, with its operating band up to 79 keV and an unprecedented sensitivity above 10 keV.
In the past, several works have shown that in the hot corona, assumed to be a slab above the disk, the high-energy cutoff is 2–3 times the electron temperature [7,8]. However, in the past few years, many theoretical efforts have been spent on proposing different geometries (patchy coronae, outflowing coronae [9,10]) and on investigating the general relativistic effects occurring in a lamp-post geometry (in which the X-ray source is assumed to be very compact and along the black hole axis [11,12]). Despite the growing number of models and codes for Comptonization available to the scientific community, no significant discrimination between geometrical models has been possible so far based solely on spectroscopy, even in the brightest, unobscured sources with very accurate high energy cutoff measurements: IC 4329A (E c = 186 ± 14 keV [13]), MCG-5-23-16 (E c = 116 5 + 6 keV [14]), SWIFT J2127.4+5654 (E c = 108 10 + 11 keV [15]), 3C 382 (E c = 214 63 + 147 keV [16]). Thanks to the recently approved IXPE satellite (expected to be launched in early 2021 [17,18]), X-ray polarimetry will be the new pair of eyes that will allow us to prefer one coronal geometry to another, at least in the brightest, unobscured AGN.
In the following, we will review the present status of the hot coronal measurements in local AGN, discuss some applications of a new model for Comptonization in astrophysics (MoCA [19]), and present future perspectives in the framework of X-ray polarimetry.

2. Recent Results

The high energy spectral curvature of AGN has been largely investigated since the launch of X-ray satellites operating above 10 keV, despite large degeneracy between the slope of the primary continuum, the cutoff energy and the amount of Compton scattered radiation by the circumnuclear material, mainly due to the fact that BeppoSAX, Suzaku, INTEGRAL and Swift cannot focus hard X-ray photons and they are therefore strongly background-dominated. BeppoSAX was the first satellite which had been used for this kind of studies [8,20] showing a relation between the photon index of the primary power law and the high energy curvature [21], likely due to the limited sensitivity of the instrument at high energies. With the advent of INTEGRAL many other works described the high energy behavior of type 1 and type 2 AGN, in particular when XMM-Newton, Suzaku or Chandra were used to cover the energy band below 10 keV [22,23,24,25]. Some of these works showed that there is a degeneracy between the cutoff energy and the Compton reflection fraction (commonly indicated as R) [25] while average values of Γ = 1.76 0.24 + 0.22 , E c = 106 61 + 186 keV, R = 1.5 1.0 + 1.5 are retrieved when only Type 1 AGN are taken into account [22]. A recent work with Swift-BAT on 838 AGN confirmed these results, with cutoff energies in the range 50–300 keV for the whole non-blazar AGN sample [26].
NuSTAR [27], launched in June 2012, is the first telescope focusing X-rays above 10 keV up to 79 keV. It has led to a number of results about the high energy emission of AGN. Recent papers [3,28] have collected and discussed the high energy cutoff measurements in the first years of NuSTAR, for about twenty unobscured nearby Seyfert galaxies (with a column density along the line of sight N H < 6 × 10 22 cm 2 ). The model used to fit the X-ray spectra of the sample is generally composed of a primary continuum (a cutoff power law) and Compton reflection from distant material and from the accretion disk. The reprocessed emission is generally modeled using xillver and relxill components [29,30]: while the former can be used to retrieve information about the Iron abundance, inclination angle and ionization state of the reflecting matter far from the nucleus, the latter includes relativistic effects due to reflection coming from the innermost regions of the accretion disk, in proximity of the central black hole. The range of photon indices and cutoffs previously found with BeppoSAX, INTEGRAL and Swift-BAT has been confirmed ( Γ = 1.7–2.0, E c = 50–300 keV) but the degeneracy between the two observables has been finally broken (Figure 2 in [3]). The lowest values for the high energy turnover are the ones found in Ark 564 (E c = 42 ± 3 keV [31]) and GRS 1734-292 (E c = 53 ± 10 keV [32]), and the highest in NGC 5506 (E c = 720 190 + 130 keV [33]). When more physical Comptonization models such as compTT, compPS, nthcomp [34,35,36,37] are taken into account (and the primary cutoff power law hence removed) values for the optical depth and electron temperature of the hot corona can be inferred with very good statistical accuracy. compTT is an analytic model that describes the Comptonization spectrum of seed optical/UV photons scattering off purely thermal electrons in the corona, while in compPS exact numerical solutions of the radiative transfer equation are taken into account, as well as Compton reflection from neutral material. At last, nthcomp allows to retrieve a photon index Γ of the Comptonized spectrum for a given pair of temperatures for the corona (kT e ) and for the accretion disk (kT b b ). These models assume a geometry in which the corona is extended above the accretion disk and distributed as a slab or a sphere (Figure 1, panels (a) and (b), respectively). In a slab configuration the range of optical depth values is τ = 0.01–2.5, with a kT e = 10–300 keV and these parameters do not correlate with physical quantities of the system such as the black hole mass, the luminosity or the accretion rate [3], as previously discussed in the past using INTEGRAL [22].
Taking into account both slab and spherical geometries the only statistically significant correlation is between the optical depth and the electron temperature, following the relations presented in [3]:
SLAB : log ( kT e ) = ( 0.7 ± 0.1 ) log ( τ ) + ( 1.60 ± 0.06 )
SPHERE : log ( kT e ) = ( 0.7 ± 0.2 ) log ( τ ) + ( 1.8 ± 0.1 ) .
A fixed disk-corona geometry in radiative balance cannot be invoked to explain the observed τ –kT e anti-correlation in a classical two-phase scenario, in which the bulk of energy is dissipated in the corona and the disk is mostly passive [1,2]. Different geometries for the accretion flow and a variation of the coronal heating/cooling ratio are therefore needed to explain the τ –kT e distribution in the whole sample [3,38]. Different works on the same sources have also shown that under the assumption that the corona is compact, only extended for a few gravitational radii, two interesting parameters such as the compactness parameter ( l L / R [39,40]) and the adimensional electron temperature ( Θ = kT e / m e c 2 ) can be introduced. The majority of the objects lie very close to the forbidden region of electron-positron pair production in the Θ l diagram, indicating that pair production and annihilation act as a sort of thermostat for AGN coronae [41]. The boundary curve depends from the geometry of the plasma but also from its composition. In presence of non-thermal particles the hybrid, Compton scattering plasma shows a wider range of allowed temperatures [42].

3. From X-Ray Spectroscopy to Polarimetry

In none of the objects observed with NuSTAR, simultaneously to XMM, Chandra, Suzaku, Swift, and included in the catalogs mentioned above [3,28,41,42], X-ray spectroscopy has led to a clear discrimination between different coronal geometries. On the other hand, Compton scattering, as any scattering mechanism, will produce a polarization signal which is strongly sensitive to the geometry of the scattering material. The IXPE and eXTP satellites [17,18,43] will be therefore crucial to the study of the coronae in the brightest, unobscured AGN. The Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE) has been selected by NASA as a SMall EXplorer Mission (SMEX) for a launch in early 2021. With a polarization sensitivity of 1.8% MDP (Minimum Detectable Polarization) in 300 ks, for a source with a flux F = 2 × 10 10 erg cm 2 s 1 and an angular resolution better than 30 arcsec, it will be the first X-ray imaging polarimeter on orbit. On the other hand, the enhanced X-ray Timing and Polarimetry mission (eXTP) has been proposed to the Chinese Academy of Sciences and selected in 2011 as one of 8 background missions. Its operating energy band is 2–10 keV and its sensitivity will be a factor 5 better in observing time than IXPE, with a comparable angular resolution. In this context, a Comptonization code which includes both general and special relativity effects as well as polarization has been recently released (MoCA, a Monte Carlo code for Comptonization in Astrophysics [19,44]). Compared to different codes in the literature, the energy-dependent Klein-Nishina cross section is taken into account [45] and different, multiple geometries are implemented [46]. We show in Figure 2 (left panel) the 2–400 keV spectrum simulated for a slab corona with kT e = 100 keV, τ = 1.0, covering the whole disk from 6 to 500 gravitational radii, with general relativistic effects switched off, for computational time purposes. The black hole mass and the accretion rate of the source are M bh = 1.5 × 10 8 M sun and 10% of the Eddington luminosity, respectively. The data are then fitted in red with a cutoff power law and clear residuals are present above ∼50 keV, indicating a large deviation from MoCA simulations, highlighting the importance of using proper Comptonization models instead of a purely phenomenological cutoff power law.
One of the brightest objects in the NuSTAR sample of unobscured sources is IC 4329A, with a 2–10 keV flux F 1 × 10 10 erg cm 2 s 1 [3,41,42]. A detailed fit to the simultaneous SuzakuNuSTAR spectra with compTT showed that a slab coronal geometry (with parameters kT e = 61 ± 1 keV, τ = 0.68 ± 0.02) and a spherical one (kT e = 50 3 + 6 keV, τ = 2.34 0.21 + 0.16 ) are statistically equivalent to reproduce the data set [13]. In Figure 2 (b panel) we show the expected polarization degree for the two physical scenarios simulated with MoCA, using 5 × 10 8 input photons initially unpolarized. The polarization degree, integrated between 2 and 8 keV (i.e., the IXPE operating energy band), is plotted against the cosine of the inclination angle. The polarization is always vertical, i.e., with the polarization vector parallel to the projection on the plan of the sky of the disk axis. When the system is observed face-on ( μ = 1) it is perfectly symmetric and the polarization degree approaches zero. When it is edge-on the polarization degree increases up to 15% for the slab and 5% for the sphere, being the latter a much more symmetrical geometry than the slab and therefore producing a much weaker polarization signal. These simulations show that for a source like IC 4329A, with an inclination angle of 60 degrees for its accretion disk [13], the coronal geometry can be clearly inferred. For this source, a Minimum Detectable Polarization (MDP) of 2% with IXPE can be obtained with an exposure time of approximately 450 ks.

4. Conclusions

We have reviewed the current status of the coronal parameters measurements in local AGN, after the launch of NuSTAR, highlighting commonalities and differences with previous analyses performed with background-dominated satellites. Unfortunately, X-ray spectroscopy has led to a clear discrimination between different coronal geometries in none of the objects observed. Thanks to the IXPE and eXTP satellites (expected to be launched in early 2021 and 2025), X-ray polarimetry will be the new pair of eyes that will allow us to prefer one coronal geometry to another. Taking advantage of the MoCA Comptonization code, we performed simulations in two coronal geometries, retrieving different polarization degrees (up to 15% for the slab and 5% for the sphere). In the very near future, we will therefore be able to distinguish between different coronal geometries responsible for the X-ray nuclear continuum, at least in the brightest, unobscured AGN.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge financial support the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant agreement n.312789. A.M., G.M. and A.T. acknowledge financial support from the Italian Space Agency under grant ASI/INAF I/037/12/0-011/13. A.M., S.B., G.M., R.M., A.T. acknowledge financial support from Italian Space Agency (ASI) under grants ASI/INAF 2015-034-R.0 and 2017-12-H.0.

Author Contributions

A.M. performed numerical simulations with MoCA and wrote the paper. F.T. developed the MoCA Comptonization code and R.M, A.T. directly contributed and worked on some of the catalogs discussed in the article. S.B., M.D., G.M. contributed to many works included in the paper and provided suggestions to improve the general shape of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Haardt, F.; Maraschi, L. A two-phase model for the X-ray emission from Seyfert galaxies. Astrophys. J. 1991, 380, L51–L54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Haardt, F.; Maraschi, L.; Ghisellini, G. A model for the X-ray and ultraviolet emission from Seyfert galaxies and galactic black holes. Astrophys. J. 1994, 432, L95–L99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tortosa, A.; Bianchi, S.; Marinucci, A.; Matt, G.; Petrucci, P.O. A NuSTAR census of coronal parameters in Seyfert galaxies. arXiv, 2018; arXiv:1801.04456. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rybicki, G.B.; Lightman, A.P. Radiative Processes in Astrophysics; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  5. Matt, G.; Perola, G.C.; Piro, L. The iron line and high energy bump as X-ray signatures of cold matter in Seyfert 1 galaxies. Astron. Astrophys. 1991, 247, 25–34. [Google Scholar]
  6. George, I.M.; Fabian, A.C. X-ray reflection from cold matter in active galactic nuclei and X-ray binaries. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1991, 249, 352–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Petrucci, P.O.; Haardt, F.; Maraschi, L.; Grandi, P.; Matt, G.; Nicastro, F.; Piro, L.; Perola, G.C.; De Rosa, A. Testing Comptonizing Coronae on a Long BeppoSAX Observation of the Seyfert 1 Galaxy NGC 5548. Astrophys. J. 2000, 540, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Petrucci, P.O.; Haardt, F.; Maraschi, L.; Grandi, P.; Malzac, J.; Matt, G.; Nicastro, F.; Piro, L.; Perola, G.C.; De Rosa, A. Testing Comptonization Models Using BeppoSAX Observations of Seyfert 1 Galaxies. Astrophys. J. 2001, 556, 716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wilkins, D.R.; Gallo, L.C. The Comptonization of accretion disc X-ray emission: Consequences for X-ray reflection and the geometry of AGN coronae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015, 448, 703–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wilkins, D.R.; Gallo, L.C.; Grupe, D.; Bonson, K.; Komossa, S.; Fabian, A.C. Flaring from the supermassive black hole in Mrk 335 studied with Swift and NuSTAR. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015, 454, 4440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tamborra, F.; Papadakis, I.; Dovčiak, M.; Svoboda, J. On the high energy cut-off of accreting sources: Is general relativity relevant? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 475, 2045–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dovčiak, M.; Done, C. Minimum X-ray source size for a lamppost corona in light-bending models for AGN. arXiv, 2015; arXiv:1507.05564. [Google Scholar]
  13. Brenneman, L.W.; Madejski, G.; Fuerst, F.; Matt, G.; Elvis, M.; Harrison, F.A.; Ballantyne, D.R.; Boggs, S.E.; Christensen, F.E.; Craig, W.W.; et al. The Broad-band X-Ray Spectrum of IC 4329A from a Joint NuSTAR/Suzaku Observation. Astrophys. J. 2014, 788, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Baloković, M.; Matt, G.; Harrison, F.A.; Zoghbi, A.; Ballantyne, D.R.; Boggs, S.E.; Christensen, F.E.; Craig, W.W.; Esmerian, C.J.; Fabian, A.C.; et al. Coronal Properties of the Seyfert 1.9 Galaxy MCG-05-23-016 Determined from Hard X-Ray Spectroscopy with NuSTAR. Astrophys. J. 2015, 800, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Marinucci, A.; Matt, G.; Kara, E.; Miniutti, G.; Elvis, M.; Arevalo, P.; Ballantyne, D.R.; Balokovic, M.; Bauer, F.; Brenneman, L.; et al. Simultaneous NuSTAR and XMM-Newton 0.5–80 keV spectroscopy of the narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxy SWIFT J2127.4+5654. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2014, 440, 2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ballantyne, D.R.; Bollenbacher, J.M.; Brenneman, L.W.; Madsen, K.K.; Balokovic, M.; Boggs, S.E.; Christensen, F.E.; Craig, W.W.; Gandhi, P.; Hailey, C.J.; et al. NuSTAR Reveals the Comptonizing Corona of the Broad-line Radio Galaxy 3C 382. Astrophys. J. 2014, 794, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Weisskopf, M.C.; Ramsey, B.; O’Dell, S.; Tennant, A.; Elsner, R.; Soffita, P.; Bellazzini, R.; Costa, E.; Kolodziejczak, J.; Kaspi, V.; et al. The Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE). Proc. SPIE 2016, 9905, 990517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Weisskopf, M.C.; Ramsey, B.; O’Dell, S.; Tennant, A.; Elsner, R.; Soffita, P.; Bellazzini, R.; Costa, E.; Kolodziejczak, J.; Kaspi, V.; et al. The Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE). Results Phys. 2016, 6, 1179–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tamborra, F.; et al. In preparation.
  20. Dadina, M. BeppoSAX observations in the 2–100 keV band of the nearby Seyfert galaxies: An atlas of spectra. Astron. Astrophys. 2007, 461, 1209–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Perola, G.C.; Matt, G.; Cappi, M.; Fiore, F.; Guainazzi, M.; Maraschi, L.; Petrucci, P.O.; Piro, L. Compton reflection and iron fluorescence in BeppoSAX observations of Seyfert type 1 galaxies. Astron. Astrophys. 2002, 389, 802–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Molina, M.; Bassani, L.; Malizia, A.; Stephen, J.B.; Bird, A.J.; Dean, A.J.; Panessa, F.; De Rosa, A.; Landi, R. The INTEGRAL complete sample of type 1 AGN. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2009, 399, 1293–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Panessa, F.; de Rosa, A.; Bassani, L.; Bazzano, A.; Bird, A.; Landi, R.; Malizia, A.; Miniutti, G.; Molina, M.; Ubertini, P. Narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies at hard X-rays. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2011, 417, 2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. De Rosa, A.; Panessa, F.; Bassani, L.; Bazzano, A.; Bird, A.; Landi, R.; Malizia, A.; Molina, M.; Ubertini, P. Broad-band study of hard X-ray-selected absorbed active galactic nuclei. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2012, 420, 2087–2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Molina, M.; Bassani, L.; Malizia, A.; Stephen, J.B.; Bird, A.J.; Bazzano, A.; Ubertini, P. Hard-X-ray spectra of active galactic nuclei in the INTEGRAL complete sample. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2013, 433, 1687–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ricci, C.; Trakhtenbrot, B.; Koss, M.J.; Ueda, Y.; Delvecchio, I.; Treister, E.; Schawinski, K.; Paltani, S.; Oh, K.; Lamperti, I.; et al. BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey. V. X-Ray Properties of the Swift/BAT 70-month AGN Catalog. Astrophys. J. 2017, 233, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Harrison, F.A.; Craig, W.W.; Christensen, F.E.; Hailey, C.J.; Zhang, W.W.; Boggs, S.E.; Stern, D.; Cook, W.R.; Forster, K.; Giommi, P.; et al. The Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR) High-energy X-Ray Mission. Astrophys. J. 2013, 770, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Marinucci, A.; Tortosa, A. The coronal parameters of local Seyfert galaxies. Astron. Nachrichten 2016, 337, 490–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Garcia, J.; Dauser, T.; Lohfink, A.; Kallman, T.R.; Steiner, J.F.; McClintock, J.E.; Brenneman, L.; Wilms, J.; Eikmann, W.; Reynolds, C.S.; et al. Improved Reflection Models of Black Hole Accretion Disks: Treating the Angular Distribution of X-Rays. Astrophys. J. 2014, 782, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dauser, T.; Garcia, J.; Parker, M.L.; Fabian, A.C.; Wilms, J. The role of the reflection fraction in constraining black hole spin. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2014, 444, L100–L104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kara, E.; Garcia, J.A.; Lohfink, A.; Fabian, A.C.; Reynolds, C.S.; Tombesi, F.; Wilkins, D.R. The high-Eddington NLS1 Ark 564 has the coolest corona. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2017, 468, 3489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tortosa, A.; Marinucci, A.; Matt, G.; Bianchi, S.; La Franca, F.; Ballantyne, D.R.; Boorman, P.G.; Fabian, A.C.; Farrah, D.; Fuerst, F.; et al. Broad-band X-ray spectral analysis of the Seyfert 1 galaxy GRS 1734-292. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2017, 466, 4193. [Google Scholar]
  33. Matt, G.; Balokovic, M.; Marinucci, A.; Ballantyne, D.R.; Boggs, S.E.; Christensen, F.E.; Comastri, A.; Craig, W.W.; Gandhi, P.; Hailey, C.J.; et al. The hard X-ray spectrum of NGC 5506 as seen by NuSTAR. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015, 447, 3029–3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Titarchuk, L. Generalized Comptonization models and application to the recent high-energy observations. Astrophys. J. 1994, 434, 570–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Poutanen, J.; Svensson, R. The Two-Phase Pair Corona Model for Active Galactic Nuclei and X-Ray Binaries: How to Obtain Exact Solutions. Astrophys. J. 1996, 470, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zdziarski, A.A.; Johnson, W.N.; Magdziarz, P. Broad-band ?-ray and X-ray spectra of NGC 4151 and their implications for physical processes and geometry. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1996, 283, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zycki, P.T.; Done, C.; Smith, D.A. The 1989 May outburst of the soft X-ray transient GS 2023+338 (V404 Cyg). Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1999, 309, 561–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Petrucci, P.O.; Ursini, F.; De Rosa, A.; Bianchi, S.; Cappi, M.; Matt, G.; Dadina, M.; Malzac, J. Testing warm Comptonization models for the origin of the soft X-ray excess in AGN. Astron. Astrophys. 2018, 611, A59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cavaliere, A.; Morrison, P. Extreme nonthermal radiation from active galactic nuclei. Astrophys. J. 1980, 238, L63–L66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guilbert, P.; Fabian, A.; Rees, M. Spectral and variability constraints on compact sources. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1983, 205, 593–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fabian, A.C.; Lohfink, A.; Kara, E.; Parker, M.L.; Vasudevan, R.; Reynolds, C.S. Properties of AGN coronae in the NuSTAR era. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015, 451, 4375–4383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fabian, A.C.; Lohfink, A.; Belmont, R.; Malzac, J.; Coppi, P. Properties of AGN coronae in the NuSTAR era- II. Hybrid plasma. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2017, 467, 2566–2570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, S.N.; Feroci, M.; Santangelo, A.; Dong, Y.W.; Feng, H.; Lu, F.J.; Nandra, K.; Wang, Z.S.; Zhang, S.; Bozzo, E.; et al. eXTP—Enhanced X-ray Timing and Polarimetry Mission. Proc. SPIE 2016, 9905, 20170006127. [Google Scholar]
  44. Middei, R.; et al. In preparation.
  45. Schnittman, J.D.; Krolik, J.H. X-ray Polarization from Accreting Black Holes: Coronal Emission. Astrophys. J. 2010, 712, 908–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Beheshtipour, B.; Krawczynski, H.; Malzac, J. The X-Ray Polarization of the Accretion Disk Coronae of Active Galactic Nuclei. Astrophys. J. 2017, 850, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Slab geometry for a hot corona distributed above an accretion disk surrounding the central black hole; (b) Spherical geometry for a hot corona.
Figure 1. (a) Slab geometry for a hot corona distributed above an accretion disk surrounding the central black hole; (b) Spherical geometry for a hot corona.
Galaxies 06 00044 g001
Figure 2. (a) The X-ray spectrum simulated for a slab corona with kT e = 100 keV, τ = 1.0 with Monte Carlo code for Comptonization in Astrophysics (MoCA) (in black), fitted with a power law model (in red) is shown. Residuals are reported in the bottom panel; (b) The polarization degree is plotted against the cosine of the inclination angle for two different geometries (see text for details).
Figure 2. (a) The X-ray spectrum simulated for a slab corona with kT e = 100 keV, τ = 1.0 with Monte Carlo code for Comptonization in Astrophysics (MoCA) (in black), fitted with a power law model (in red) is shown. Residuals are reported in the bottom panel; (b) The polarization degree is plotted against the cosine of the inclination angle for two different geometries (see text for details).
Galaxies 06 00044 g002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marinucci, A.; Tamborra, F.; Bianchi, S.; Dovčiak, M.; Matt, G.; Middei, R.; Tortosa, A. Hot Coronae in Local AGN: Present Status and Future Perspectives. Galaxies 2018, 6, 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies6020044

AMA Style

Marinucci A, Tamborra F, Bianchi S, Dovčiak M, Matt G, Middei R, Tortosa A. Hot Coronae in Local AGN: Present Status and Future Perspectives. Galaxies. 2018; 6(2):44. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies6020044

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marinucci, Andrea, Francesco Tamborra, Stefano Bianchi, Michal Dovčiak, Giorgio Matt, Riccardo Middei, and Alessia Tortosa. 2018. "Hot Coronae in Local AGN: Present Status and Future Perspectives" Galaxies 6, no. 2: 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies6020044

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop