Next Article in Journal
Factors Affecting Species Identifications of Blow Fly Pupae Based upon Chemical Profiles and Multivariate Statistics
Previous Article in Journal
Post-Colonization Interval Estimates Using Multi-Species Calliphoridae Larval Masses and Spatially Distinct Temperature Data Sets: A Case Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Efficacy of Ozone against Phosphine Susceptible and Resistant Strains of Four Stored-Product Insect Species

Department of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2017, 8(2), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects8020042
Submission received: 28 March 2017 / Revised: 3 April 2017 / Accepted: 5 April 2017 / Published: 11 April 2017

Abstract

:
The efficacy of ozone was evaluated against four economically-important stored-product insect species at 27.2 °C and 20.4% r.h. Adults of phosphine-susceptible laboratory strains and phosphine-resistant field strains of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst), saw-toothed grain beetle, Oryzaephilus surinamensis (Linnaeus), maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky, and rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (Linnaeus), were exposed in vials to an ozone concentration of 0.42 g/m3 (200 ppm) for 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h with 0 and 10 g of wheat. Initial and final mortalities were assessed 1 and 5 d after exposure to ozone, respectively. After an 8–12-h exposure to ozone, initial mortality of Sitophilus spp. and O. surinamensis was 100%, whereas the highest initial mortality of T. castaneum was 90%. A 3–4-h exposure to ozone resulted in 100% final mortality of Sitophilus spp., whereas O. surinamensis required a 6- to 10-h exposure to ozone. Adults of T. castaneum were least susceptible to ozone, and after a 10-h exposure, mortality ranged between 82 and 95%. Time for the 5 d 99% mortality (LT99) for adults of laboratory and field strains of Sitophilus spp., O. surinamensis and T. castaneum were 2.00–5.56, 4.33–11.18 and 14.35–29.89 h, respectively. The LT99 values for adults of T. castaneum and O. surinamensis were not significantly different between bioassays conducted with 0 and 10 g of wheat. The LT99 values for the laboratory strains of Sitophilus spp. in the absence of wheat were significantly lower than those obtained in the presence of wheat. Both phosphine-susceptible and -resistant strains were equally susceptible to ozone. Ozone effectively suppressed adult progeny production of all four species. Ozone is a viable alternative fumigant to control phosphine-resistant strains of these four species.

1. Introduction

Ozone is a highly reactive gas and has been used as a disinfectant in water treatment plants, as well as in the food-processing industry [1,2]. The decomposition of ozone leads to the formation of free radicals, including O3, O2, O, OH, HO3 and HO2, which can oxidize sulfhydryl groups found in amino acids, peptides, proteins and unsaturated fatty acids of organisms [1,3,4]. The oxidation of amino acids by ozone is believed to be responsible for the alteration of protein structure and function [3,4]. The half-life of ozone is affected by temperature and relative humidity [5]. At 50% relative humidity (r.h.), the half-life of ozone at 4, 24, 28 and 40 °C is 1850, 850, 650 and 0 min, respectively. In addition to temperature, the moisture content of grain or ambient relative humidity has an impact on the efficacy of ozone against insects and microorganisms [5].
Ozone has been reported to deactivate microflora and degrade mycotoxins and to effectively kill coleopterous and lepidopterous stored-product insect pests [2,6,7,8,9,10]. Due to its highly reactive nature, the rate of ozone penetration through the grain mass is related to the surface characteristics of grain kernels [2,10]. The reaction of ozone within a grain mass has been categorized into two phases: phase I and phase II. During phase I, ozone reacts with the active sites on the kernel surface, and once all sites are saturated, the ozone concentration gradually increases (phase II) to levels lethal for the target insect pests [11,12]. The length of these two phases is affected by the quantity of grain, ozone flow rate, concentration of inlet ozone, grain temperature, and grain moisture content [11,12].
Insects have the ability to evolve resistance to insecticides [13]. Using simulations of population genetic models, researchers found that resistance is more likely to occur if the major genes for resistance to an insecticide are present prior to insecticide exposure [13]. Sousa et al. [14] studied ozone toxicity to the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky, under selection pressure for two generations and did not find any evidence of resistance development to ozone. Typically, selection pressure should be applied for at least 10 generations to observe any discernable evidence of resistance development.
Widespread resistance in insects associated with stored grain to phosphine [15,16], a commonly-used grain fumigant, necessitates finding alternatives to control phosphine-resistant insects. Ozone is a potential alternative to phosphine; however, its efficacy against phosphine-resistant insects has not been well studied [6]. In this study, both phosphine-susceptible laboratory and -resistant field strains of four economically-important stored-product insect species were exposed to ozone for evaluating its efficacy in controlling phosphine-resistant insects. In addition, the ability of ozone in suppressing adult progeny production of these four species was evaluated.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Insect Cultures

Cultures of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst), were reared on organic wheat flour (Heartland Mills, Marienthal, KS, USA) fortified with 5% (by wt) brewer’s yeast. The rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (Linnaeus), was reared on organic hard red winter wheat (Heartland Mills). Cultures of S. zeamais were reared on organic yellow corn (Heartland Mills) and that of saw-toothed grain beetle, Oryzaephilus surinamensis (Linnaeus), on organic rolled oats (Heartland Mills) plus 5% (by wt) brewer’s yeast diet. All cultures were held at 28 °C and 65% r.h. in an environmental growth chamber (Model I-36 VL; Percival Scientific, Perry, IA, USA). Unsexed adults of T. castaneum and O. surinamensis of mixed ages (1–4 weeks old) were collected directly from culture jars after sifting the culture through an 841-µm opening square-holed sieve. For Sitophilus spp., the culture was sifted through a 1.68-mm opening square-holed sieve. Field strains of T. castaneum and O. surinamensis were collected from farm-stored grain in Kansas, USA, whereas field strains of S. zeamais and S. oryzae were collected from farm-stored grain in Texas, USA. Phosphine resistance of all species and strains was verified following a discriminating dose test [17], where 50 unsexed mixed-age (1–4 weeks old) adults were exposed to phosphine in triplicate. Phosphine concentrations used during the test for T. castaneum, O. surinamensis and Sitophilus spp. strains were 0.042, 0.052 and 0.042 g/m3, respectively (30, 37.5 and 30 ppm; 1 g/m3 = 719 ppm at 25 °C). Fumigation lasted for 20 h, and mortality was assessed 14 day after fumigation (Table 1).

2.2. Bioassays

Bioassays were carried out in snap cap vials (23 mm in diameter and 55 mm in height) that had mesh bottoms (250 µm opening) and mesh caps with the same size openings to facilitate penetration of ozone through the vials and also to prevent insects from escaping. The ozone exposure was conducted in an air-tight polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) chamber (0.50 m × 0.35 m × 0.35 m). Ozone was generated by a custom-built corona discharge ozone generator (O3Co, Idaho Falls, ID, USA) with a capacity of 2.5 g/h and monitored by a gas analyzer (IN2000-L2-LC, IN USA, Norwood, MA, USA). The ozone concentration in the testing chamber was recorded every minute and acquired by a program written in LABVIEW (National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA). The ozone generator was housed inside a trailer that was parked outside on the North campus of Department of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA. The temperature and relative humidity of the chamber were monitored by HOBO® temperature and humidity sensors (Model: U10-003, Onset Computer Corp, MA, USA). The mean ± standard error (SE) (n = 266) temperature during tests was 27.2 ± 0.08 °C with the minimum and maximum being 22.9 and 32.5 °C, respectively. The mean ± SE relative humidity during tests was 20.4% ± 0.9%, with the minimum and maximum being 15.0% and 30.6%, respectively. Each vial held 20 adults of a specific species and strain with either 0 or 10 g of wheat. The feeding air flow rate was 0.02 m3/minute. Samples were exposed to 0.42 g/m3 (200 ppm, 1 g/m3 = 476 ppm at 25 °C) of ozone for 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 h. An additional 12-h exposure was included in bioassays with O. surinamensis strains. After the intended exposure to ozone, vials were brought back to the laboratory and kept in the environmental growth chamber at 28 °C and 65% r.h. Prior to incubating in the growth chamber, vials without wheat received 10 g of wheat as food for insects. Mortality was checked 1 and 5 d after ozone exposure. Control vials were kept in the trailer where the ozone exposure was conducted throughout the tests and were handled similarly as the treatment vials. After mortality assessment, dead and live adults were placed back into the vials and held in the growth chamber for 42 d to determine adult progeny production. Vials with T. castaneum and O. surinamensis received 2 g of organic whole wheat flour and rolled oats, respectively, to provide food for larvae emerging from eggs and to allow normal development to adulthood, because in previous tests, these two species held in vials with only wheat kernels failed to develop to adulthood [18]. Each treatment combination was replicated five times. All bioassays with ozone were conducted between August and October 2015.

2.3. Data Analysis

Mortality was expressed as a percentage based on the number of dead insects out of the total exposed. Mortality of exposed insects was corrected for control mortality [19]. The corrected 5 d mortality data were subjected to probit analysis [20] to determine exposure time resulting in 50% (LT50) and 99% (LT99) mortality of insects. LT99 values were compared using ratio tests [21]. If the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the ratio included 1, the difference between the pair being compared was not significant [21]. The number of adult progeny produced was counted, and the initial number of added insects (20) was subtracted from this number. Progeny production by species and strain were transformed to log10(x + 1), and subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine the effect of exposure time on progeny production for each strain. Means were separated by Bonferroni t-tests at α = 0.05 [19]. Both the corrected 1- and 5-d mortality were plotted against exposure durations using Sigma Plot® (12.5, SYSTAT 2013, San Jose, CA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

The 5-d mortality of O. surinamensis and Sitophilus spp. adults after 6–10 and 3–10 h of exposure to ozone was 100%. The 5-d mortality of T. castaneum adults was 83%–100% after 8–10 h of exposure to ozone (Table 2). Sitophilus spp. generally were more susceptible to ozone than O. surinamensis and T. castaneum. Other studies also reported Sitophilus spp. to be more susceptible to ozone exposure than T. castaneum. Kells et al. [11] exposed adults of T. castaneum and S. zeamais to an ozone concentration of 0.10 g/m3 (50 ppm) for 3 d, and the mortality of these two species was 92.2 and 100%, respectively. Hansen et al. [22] exposed adults of T. castaneum, O. surinamensis, S. oryzae and S. zeamais to low concentrations of ozone for several days, and complete mortality was observed at the following concentrations for each species: 0.074 g/m3 (35 ppm) for 6 d for T. castaneum, 0.042 g/m3 (20 ppm) for 5 d for O. surinamensis, 0.044 g/m3 (21 ppm) for 5 d for S. oryzae and 0.164 g/m3 (78 ppm) for 5 d for S. zeamais. S. zeamais adults were least susceptible to ozone followed by T. castaneum, O. surinamensis and S. oryzae. McDonough et al. [8] exposed adults of T. castaneum, S. oryzae and S. zeamais to an ozone concentration of 1800 ppm (3.84 g/m3), and complete mortality was obtained after 120, 60 and 120 h, respectively.
Ozone can cause oxidative damage to insects, and to deal with this oxidative stress, one of the strategies insects use is to lower the respiration rate by breathing discontinuously [23]. One hundred adults of S. oryzae and T. castaneum were exposed to 0.2 g/m3 ozone for 2 h, and the carbon dioxide production of was 6.0 and 2.6 µl/mg of insects, respectively. However, corresponding carbon dioxide production of these two species in the control was 6.5 and 3.6 µl/mg of insects, respectively [23]. Regardless whether ozone was present or not, adults of S. oryzae generated close to one-fold more carbon dioxide than adults of T. castaneum, indicating that S. oryzae has a higher respiration rate than T. castaneum [23]. These differences in respiration rates may have contributed to Sitophilus spp. being more susceptible to ozone than T. castaneum that we observed in our study.
The probit estimates for lethal times (LT50 and LT99) are shown in Table 3 and Table 4. Based on 5-d mortality, in the presence of 10 g of wheat, LT50 and LT99 values for T. castaneum, O. surinamensis, S. zeamais and S. oryzae were 2.85–4.99 and 13.64–25.81, 1.16–2.28 and 7.07–11.18, 1.75–1.92 and 3.80–5.56 and 1.32–1.51 and 2.00–3.11 h, respectively. Sitophilus spp. tended to be more susceptible to ozone, and LT values were less than those of O. surinamensis and T. castaneum by 2–5-fold. Bonjour et al. [24] exposed adults of T. castaneum and S. oryzae to 0.10 g/m3 (50 ppm) of ozone for one day inside a steel grain bin, which contained 13,600 kg of hard red winter wheat. Adults of each species were confined in cotton muslin tea bags with 50 g of wheat kernels. The survival of T. castaneum and S. oryzae was 100 and 35%, respectively, indicating that T. castaneum is more tolerant to ozone than S. oryzae.
In our study, when insects were exposed to ozone without wheat, LT50 and LT99 values for T. castaneum, O. surinamensis, S. zeamais and S. oryzae were 3.76–4.78 and 10.65–29.89, 0.98–2.10 and 4.33–9.05, 0.80–1.32 and 3.14–4.20 and 0.92–1.10 and 2.32–2.91 h, respectively. As expected, Sitophilus spp. were more susceptible to ozone than the other species. Sousa et al. [6] exposed 20 unsexed adults of T. castaneum and O. surinamensis collected from 23 locations in Brazil to 0.32g/m3 (150 ppm) of ozone in the absence of food. The LT99 values based on 8-d mortality were 22.17–37.90 h for T. castaneum and 11.03–18.72 h for O. surinamensis, and these values are comparable to our results.
The effect of adding 10 g wheat on the efficacy of ozone at 0.42 g/m3 was not significant (Table 5). Ratio tests showed that there were no significant differences between the 5-d LT99 values of samples with 0 and 10 g of wheat, except for S. zeamais and S. oryzae laboratory strains, where LT99 values were higher when wheat was present during ozone exposure. As an oxidizing agent, ozone can react with the active sites on the surface of the wheat kernels prior to targeting insects [11]. However, when a small amount of wheat was present during the exposure, time for ozone to saturate the active sites can be marginal compared to the total exposure time. Insects were exposed to a similar concentration of ozone regardless of whether wheat was present or absent.
Based on the ratio test results, phosphine-susceptible and -resistant strains of the same species had a similar LT99 value regardless of the presence or absence of wheat (Table 6). However, for S. zeamais, in the absence of wheat, the phosphine-susceptible laboratory strain showed higher LT99 values than the corresponding phosphine-resistant field strain. The LT99 value of the S. oryzae Lab strain was lower than the TX strain in the absence of wheat. When wheat was not present during ozone exposure, the T. castaneum Lab strain had a significantly higher LT99 value than the PD strain; and O. surinamensis AB2 strains had a significantly higher LT99 value than the Lab strain.
Ozone oxidizes sulfhydryl groups (-SH) of proteins and double bonds of polyunsaturated fatty acids, and as ozone gets degraded to oxygen, reactive oxygen species are generated that could induce oxidative stress to organisms [1]. Destruction of these vital molecules can lead to cellular lesion and death in insects [25]. Holmstrup et al. [25] did not find up regulation of the focal genes they studied after exposing T. castaneum adults to ozone for 24 h, but reported down regulation of many genes. With a 24-h exposure to ozone, the adult survival rate slightly decreased after 3 d, but when exposed to ozone for 48 h, the adult survival rate greatly decreased after 3 d. They recommended that more gene expression studies are needed at several temporal scales to reveal when specific focal genes would show a response. Phosphine is known to inhibit aerobic respiration in several organisms [26,27,28,29,30]. Phosphine inhibits cytochrome c oxidase in the mitochondrial electron transport chain [26,31]. Other proposed modes of action for phosphine include chemical reaction with hydrogen peroxide to form the hydroxyl radical, which can cause oxidative damage [32]. This finding was supported by in vivo and in vitro studies using mammalian cell lines exposed to phosphine [32,33,34]. Phosphine was shown to inhibit the antioxidant enzymes catalase and peroxidase [35]. Liu et al. [36] using the larvae of the common fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster Meigen, have shown that phosphine reduced the aerobic respiration rate with an increase in hydrogen peroxide and lipid peroxidation. It seems phosphine and ozone target different components of the cells, which may explain the lack of cross-resistance between these two gases.
Progeny was observed in both control and most treatment vials, and results are shown in Table 7 and Table 8. In the presence of wheat, there was significant progeny reduction compared to the control (Table 7) for all tested strains except for the T. castaneum PD strain (F = 0.35, df = 7, 32, p = 0.9256). The T. castaneum CF strain showed a relatively low adult progeny in the control treatment (mean ± SE, 14.2 ± 1.0 adults per vial), and the highest progeny reduction was only 25.4% (after exposure to ozone for 6 h). For the rest of the strains and species, the highest progeny reduction ranged from 96.9%–100%. The lack of adult progeny reduction in T. castaneum is attributed to the low mortality of adults as a function of ozone exposure time (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The mean ± SE 1- and 5-d mortalities of the T. castaneum PD strain exposed to ozone after 10 h with 10 g of wheat were 51.9% ± 3.6% and 95.1% ± 1.5%, respectively. It is reasonable to believe that T. castaneum adults can still reproduce after the short exposure to ozone. In addition, ozone does not leave a residue [37,38]. Therefore, eggs and larval stages present after exposure were able to survive and develop into adults.
Greater progeny reduction was observed in O. surinamensis, S. zeamais and S. oryzae strains. In the presence of wheat, the mean control adult progeny production of laboratory and field strains of O. surinamensis was 260.6 and 355.8 adults per vial, respectively, and the mean adult progeny in the treated vials of these two strains was 2.4 and 3.8 adults per vial, respectively, after a 4-h ozone exposure (Table 7). The mean adult progeny production of Lab and TX strains of S. zeamais in the control treatment was 278.4 and 160.4 adults per vial, respectively. After a 4-h exposure to ozone, adult progeny production of these two strains was 4.8 and 3.8 adults per vial for the Lab and TX strains, respectively. Similarly, without exposure to ozone, the mean control adult progeny production of the Lab and TX strains of S. oryzae was 223.0 and 190.8 adults per vial, respectively, and after a 4-h ozone exposure in the presence of wheat, the mean adult progeny was 2.0 and 1.2 adults per vial, respectively. Adult progeny were generally produced by survivors after the ozone exposure. The 1-d mortality of O. surinamensis Lab and AB2 strains was 13.4% and 11.9%, respectively, after a 4-h exposure to an ozone concentration of 0.42 g/m3, and the mortality increased to 99.0% and 79.3%, respectively, when assessments were made on day 5 (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The increase in mortality over time after brief exposures to ozone suggested delayed toxic effects of ozone in adults of the four species. Delayed toxic effects with ozone have been reported in our earlier studies with adults of the lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) [39]. The 1-d mortality of the Lab and TX strains of S. zeamais was 31.6% and 57.9%, respectively, and that of S. oryzae was 40.7% and 27.6%, respectively. The 5-d mortality of both species and strains was 100% (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Although O. surinamensis, S. oryzae and S. zeamais strains showed low 1-d mortality at shorter exposure periods to ozone, the corresponding progeny reduction was significant. It is plausible that adults of these three species were able to reproduce less after ozone exposure compared to T. castaneum. The discrepancy of progeny reduction among species after ozone exposure was also observed in other studies. After exposure to 1 mg spinosad per kg of wheat, the progeny reduction of T. castaneum and O. surinamensis strains ranged from 89.8–100% and 68.3%–89.4%, respectively [40]. After exposure to 0.5 mg deltamethrin per kg of wheat, the progeny reduction of T. castaneum and O. surinamensis strains ranged from 63.3%–100% and 19.1%–100%, respectively [41]. Our previous study demonstrated that exposure of S. oryzae and S. zeamais in vials with 10 g of wheat to a chlorine dioxide concentration of 0.54 g/m3 (200 ppm) for 5 and 10 h, respectively, resulted in 100% progeny reduction. By comparison, to reach 99% progeny reduction, the laboratory and field strains of R. dominica in the presence of 10 g of wheat needed to be exposed to a chlorine dioxide concentration of 0.54 g/m3 for 14.71–15.36 h [18].
Samples without any wheat showed a very similar trend, where progeny reduction was observed after shorter ozone exposures compared to reduction in vials with wheat (Table 8). The T. castaneum PD strain again failed to show a significant progeny reduction compared to the control treatment even after a 10-h exposure. The mean ± SE 1- and 5-d mortalities of this strain after a 10-h ozone exposure were 46.7% ± 6.6% and 83.0% ± 4.6%, respectively. The mean ± SE progeny production was 49.4 ± 14.0 adults per vial, which was higher than the control treatment (39.8% ± 4.6% adults per vial). For the other two T. castaneum strains, significant adult progeny reduction (94.5%–94.7%) was observed after a 10-h exposure. The progeny reduction of O. surinamensis Lab and AB2 strains reached 99.7% after a 4-h ozone exposure. Progeny reduction was 100% for all strains of Sitophilus spp. after a two- or four-hour exposure to an ozone concentration of 0.42 g/m3.
The reduction in adult progeny production at increasing exposures to ozone can be attributed to an increase in adult mortality. It is also plausible that eggs laid by adults prior to ozone exposure or by adults that survived short exposures of ozone, survived fumigation and successfully developed into F1 adults. This appears to be reasonable, especially in the case of T. castaneum. The susceptibility of the eggs to a fumigant is directly related to the architecture of chorion [42]. For stored-product insects, a fumigant can directly enter eggs through respiratory openings (aeropyles) and sperm penetration openings (micropyles) or diffuse through the chorion layers [43,44,45]. However, the rates of gas exchange are expected to be different between these two mechanisms [43,45]. When aeropyles (pseudomicropyles) of the eggs of the hemipteran Rhodnius prolixus (Stahl) were sealed with shellac, the oxygen (O2) consumption rate was 0.012 mm3 O2 per egg per h compared to the untreated eggs, which had an O2 consumption rate of 0.108 mm3 O2 per egg per h, indicating that aeropyles facilitate the exchange of gases [43]. The amount and distribution of aeropyles and micropyles vary among eggs of different insect species. Eggs of T. castaneum and O. surinamensis have a smooth surface and do not have aeropyles or micropyles, suggesting that gas exchange is mainly through diffusion through the chorionic layers [46,47]. The absence of aeropyles and micropyles may have led to less than lethal up-take of ozone during exposures by T. castaneum and O. surinamensis eggs compared to other species. Therefore, it is possible for these eggs to survive to adulthood. The adults of T. castaneum and O. surinamensis that emerged from such eggs contributed to the high adult progeny production observed in ozone treatments. Enoplopactus lizeri (Hustache) and Naupactus rugosus (Hustache), species belonging to the Curculionidae family (weevils), have a few scattered aeropyles on the chorionic surface of the eggs [48]. It is reasonable to assume that the eggs of Sitophilus spp., which belong to the Curculionidae family, may have aeropyles like other members in the family. The presence of aeropyles can facilitate the up-take of ozone and result in higher egg mortality [47], resulting in fewer adults emerging in ozone treatments. The smaller number of F1 adult progeny produced by Sitophilus spp. exposed to ozone treatments could be due to fewer surviving adults available in these treatments. Examination of Figure 1 and Figure 2, which show increasing mortality of adults, and Table 7 and Table 8, which show a reduction in progeny production, as a function of ozone exposure time, supports this view.

4. Conclusions

An ozone concentration of 0.42 g/m3 effectively killed adults of phosphine-susceptible and -resistant strains of T. castaneum, O. surinamensis, S. oryzae and S. zeamais. In addition, phosphine-susceptible and -resistant strains of each species were equally susceptible to ozone. At this concentration, fumigation for 10 h can completely suppress adult progeny production of Sitophilus spp. and O. surinamensis, but not that of T. castaneum strains. The 10 g of wheat in vials did not significantly affect the efficacy of ozone against the four insect species when compared to those exposed to ozone without wheat. The laboratory findings should be confirmed by tests under practical field conditions, such as grain bins or in grain-processing facilities.

Acknowledgments

We thank the O3Co Company (Idaho Fall, ID, USA) for the donation of the ozone generator. The authors acknowledge the support of Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre (Project No.: PBCRC3038) established and supported under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centre Program. This paper is Contribution Number 17-305-J of the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station.

Author Contributions

Xinyi E and Bhadriraju Subramanyam conceived of and designed the experiments. Xinyi E and Beibei Li performed the experiments. Xinyi E and Bhadriraju Subramanyam analyzed the data. Xinyi E and Bhadriraju Subramanyam wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; nor in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Khadre, M.A.; Yousef, A.E.; Kim, J.G. Microbiological aspects of ozone applications in food: A review. J. Food Sci. 2001, 66, 1242–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tiwari, B.K.; Brennan, C.S.; Curran, T.; Gallagher, E.; Cullen, P.J.; O’ Donnell, C.P. Application of ozone in grain processing. J. Cereal Sci. 2010, 51, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sharma, V.K.; Graham, N.J.D. Oxidation of amino acids, peptides and proteins by ozone: A review. Ozone Sci. Eng. 2010, 32, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Choe, J.K.; Richards, D.H.; Wilson, C.J.; Mitch, W.A. Degradation of amino acids and structure in model proteins and bacteriophage MS2 by chlorine, bromine, and ozone. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2015, 49, 13331–13339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. McClurkin, J.D.; Maier, D.E.; Ileleji, K.E. Half-life time of ozone as a function of air movement and conditions in a sealed container. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2013, 55, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sousa, A.H.; Faroni, L.R.D.; Guedes, R.N.C.; Totola, M.R.; Urruchi, W.I. Ozone as a management alternative against phosphine-resistant insect pests of stored products. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2008, 44, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Isikber, A.A.; Oztekin, S. Comparison of susceptibility of two stored-product insects, Ephestia kuehniella Zeller and Tribolium confusum du Val to gaseous ozone. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2009, 45, 159–164. [Google Scholar]
  8. McDonough, M.X.; Mason, L.J.; Woloshuk, C.P. Susceptibility of stored product insects to high concentrations of ozone at different exposure intervals. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2011, 47, 306–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. White, S.D.; Murphy, P.T.; Leandro, L.F.; Bern, C.J.; Beattie, S.E.; Van Leeuwen, J.H. Mycoflora of high-moisture maize treated with ozone. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2013, 55, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Isikber, A.A.; Athanassiou, C.G. The use of ozone gas for the control of insects and micro-organisms in stored products. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2015, 64, 139–145. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kells, S.A.; Mason, L.J.; Maier, D.E.; Woloshuk, C.P. Efficacy and fumigation characteristics of ozone in stored maize. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2001, 37, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Campabadal, C.A.; Maier, D.E.; Mason, L.J. Efficacy of fixed bed ozonation treatment to control insects in stored bulk grain. Appl. Engg. Agric. 2013, 29, 693–704. [Google Scholar]
  13. Groeters, F.; Tabashnik, B.E. Roles of selection intensity, major genes, and minor genes in evolution of insecticide resistance. J. Econ. Entomol. 2000, 93, 1580–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sousa, A.H.; Faroni, L.R.D.; Pimentel, M.A.G.; Silva, G.N.; Guedes, R.N.C. Ozone toxicity to Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) populations under selection pressure from ozone. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2016, 65, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Opit, G.P.; Phillips, T.W.; Aikins, M.J.; Hassan, M.M. Phosphine resistance in Tribolium castaneum and Rhyzopertha dominica from stored wheat in Oklahoma. J. Econ. Entomol. 2012, 105, 1107–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mau, Y.S.; Collins, P.J.; Daglish, G.J.; Nayak, M.K.; Pavic, H.; Ebert, P.R. The rph1 gene is a common contributor to the evolution of phosphine resistance in independent field isolates of Rhyzopertha dominica. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Champ, B.R.; Dyte, C.E. Report of the FAO Global Survey of Pesticide Susceptibility of Stored Grain Pests; Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 1976; pp. 146–163. [Google Scholar]
  18. Xinyi, E.; Subramanyam, B.; Li, B. Responses of phosphine susceptible and resistant strains of five stored-product insect species to chlorine dioxide. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2017, 72, 21–27. [Google Scholar]
  19. Abbott, W.S. A method for computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol. 1925, 18, 265–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT 9.2 User’s Guide. SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  21. Robertson, J.L.; Preisler, H.K. Pesticide Bioassays with Arthropods; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hansen, L.S.; Hansen, P.; Jensen, K.M.V. Lethal doses of ozone for control of all stages of internal and external feeders in stored products. Pest Manag. Sci. 2012, 68, 1311–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lu, B.; Ren, Y.; Du, Y.Z.; Fu, Y.; Gu, J. Effect of ozone on respiration of adult Sitophilus oryzae (L.), Tribolium castaneum (Herbst), and Rhyzopertha dominica (F.). J. Insect Physiol. 2009, 54, 885–889. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bonjour, E.L.; Opit, G.P.; Hardin, J.; Jones, C.L.; Payton, M.E.; Beeby, R.L. Efficacy of ozone fumigation against the major grain pests in stored wheat. J. Econ. Entomol. 2011, 104, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Holmstrup, M.; Sorensen, J.G.; Heckmann, L.H.; Slotsbo, S.; Hansen, P.; Hansen, L.S. Effects of ozone on gene expression and lipid peroxidatbn ion in adults and larvae of the red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum). J. Stored Prod. Res. 2011, 47, 378–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chefurka, W.; Kashi, K.P.; Bond, E.J. The effect of phosphine on electron transport in mitochondria. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 1976, 6, 65–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dua, R.; Gill, K.D. Effect of aluminium phosphide exposure on kinetic properties of cytochrome oxidase and mitochondrial energy metabolism in rat brain. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1674, 4–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Jian, F.; Jayas, D.S.; White, N.D.G. Toxic action of phosphine on the adults of the copra mite Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Astigmata: Acaridae). Phytoprot. 2000, 81, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Singh, S.; Bhalla, A.; Verma, S.K.; Kaur, A.; Gill, K. Cytochrome-c oxidase inhibition in 26 aluminum phosphide poisoned patients. Clinical Toxicol. 2006, 44, 155–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zuryn, S.; Kuang, J.; Ebert, P. Mitochondrial modulation of phosphine toxicity and resistance in Caenorhabditis elegans. Toxicol. Sci. 2008, 102, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Nakakita, H. The inhibitory site of phosphine. J. Pestic. Sci. 1976, 1, 235–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Quistad, G.B.; Sparks, S.E.; Casida, J.E. Chemical model for phosphine-induced lipid peroxidation. Pest Manag. Sci. 2000, 56, 779–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hsu, C.H.; Chi, B.C.; Casida, J.E. Melatonin reduces phosphine-induced lipid and DNA oxidation in vitro and in vivo in rat brain. J. Pineal Res. 2002, 32, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hsu, C.H.; Chi, B.C.; Liu, M.Y.; Li, J.H.; Chen, C.J.; Chen, R.Y. Phosphine-induced oxidative damage in rats: role of glutathione. Toxicol. 2002, 179, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chaudhry, M.Q. A review of the mechanisms involved in the action of phosphine as an insecticide and phosphine resistance in stored-product insects. Pestic. Sci. 1997, 49, 213–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, T.; Li, L.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Y. Transcriptional inhibition of the Catalase gene in phosphine-induced oxidative stress in Drosophila melanogaster. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2015, 124, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Baba, S.; Satoh, S.; Yamabe, C. Development of measurement equipment of half life of ozone. Vacuum 2002, 65, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hardin, J.A.; Jones, C.L.; Bonjour, E.L.; Noyes, R.T.; Beeby, R.L.; Eltiste, D.A.; Decker, S. Ozone fumigation of stored grain: Closed-loop recirculation and the rate of ozone consumption. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2010, 46, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Subramanyam, B.; Xinyi, E.; Savoldelli, S.; Sehgal, B. Efficacy of ozone against Rhyzopertha dominica adults in wheat. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2017, 70, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sehgal, B.; Subramanyam, B.; Arthur, F.H.; Gill, B.S. Variation in susceptibility of field strains of three stored grain insect species to spinosad and chlorpyrifos-methyl plus deltamethrin on hard red winter wheat. J. Econ. Entomol. 2013, 106, 1911–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Sehgal, B.; Subramanyam, B. Efficacy of a new deltamethrin formulation on concrete and wheat against adults of laboratory and field strains of three stored-grain insect species. J. Econ. Entomol. 2014, 107, 2229–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Campbell, B.E.; Pereira, R.M.; Koehler, P.G. Complications with Controlling Insect Eggs. In Insecticide Resistance; Intech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2016; pp. 83–96. [Google Scholar]
  43. Tuft, P.H. The structure of the insect egg-shell in relation to the respiration of the embryo. J. Exp. Biol. 1950, 26, 327–334. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hinton, H.E. Respiratory systems of insect egg shells. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1969, 14, 343–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Omelina, E.S.; Baricheva, E.M.; Fedorova, E.V. Main types of respiratory system structure of egg shells in insects and genes participating in their development. Biol. Bull. Rev. 2012, 3, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kucerova, Z.; Stejskal, V. Comparative egg morphology of silvanid and laemophloeid beetles (Coleoptera) occurring in stored products. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2002, 38, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gautam, S.G.; Opit, G.P.; Margosan, D.; Tebbets, J.S.; Walse, S. Egg morphology of key stored-product insect pests of the United States. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2014, 107, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Marvaldi, A. Eggs and oviposition habits in Entimini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Coleopt. Bull. 1999, 53, 115–126. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Corrected 1-d mortality of four insect species after exposure to an ozone concentration of 0.42 g/m3 for different durations. a. Three strains of T. castaneum were exposed to ozone with 0 and 10 g of wheat; b. Two strains of O. surinamensis were exposed to ozone with 0 and 10 g of wheat; c. Two strains of S. oryzae were exposed to ozone with 0 and 10 g of wheat; d. Two strains of S. zeamais were exposed to ozone with 0 and 10 g of wheat. The 1-d mortality in the control treatments with 10 g of wheat for T. castaneum, O. surinamensis, S. zeamais and S. oryzae was 0–3%, 2.8%–3.7%, 4% and 0–1.8%, respectively; and the 1-d mortality in the control treatments with 0 g of wheat for T. castaneum, O. surinamensis, S. zeamais and S. oryzae was 0–2.9%, 7.0%–13.0%, 1.1%–3.0% and 2%, respectively.
Figure 1. Corrected 1-d mortality of four insect species after exposure to an ozone concentration of 0.42 g/m3 for different durations. a. Three strains of T. castaneum were exposed to ozone with 0 and 10 g of wheat; b. Two strains of O. surinamensis were exposed to ozone with 0 and 10 g of wheat; c. Two strains of S. oryzae were exposed to ozone with 0 and 10 g of wheat; d. Two strains of S. zeamais were exposed to ozone with 0 and 10 g of wheat. The 1-d mortality in the control treatments with 10 g of wheat for T. castaneum, O. surinamensis, S. zeamais and S. oryzae was 0–3%, 2.8%–3.7%, 4% and 0–1.8%, respectively; and the 1-d mortality in the control treatments with 0 g of wheat for T. castaneum, O. surinamensis, S. zeamais and S. oryzae was 0–2.9%, 7.0%–13.0%, 1.1%–3.0% and 2%, respectively.
Insects 08 00042 g001
Figure 2. Corrected 5-d mortality of four insect species after exposure to an ozone concentration of 0.42 g/m3 for different durations. a. Three strains of T. castaneum were exposed to ozone with 0 and 10 g of wheat; b. Two strains of O. surinamensis were exposed to ozone with 0 and 10 g of wheat; c. Two strains of S. oryzae were exposed to ozone with 0 and 10 g of wheat; d. Two strains of S. zeamais were exposed to ozone with 0 and 10 g of wheat. The 1-d mortality in the control treatments with 10 g of wheat for T. castaneum, O. surinamensis, S. zeamais and S. oryzae was 0–10.7%, 6.3%–15.2%, 6.0%–7.7% and 2.0%–3.9%, respectively; and the 5-d mortality in the control treatments with 0 g of wheat for T. castaneum, O. surinamensis, S. zeamais and S. oryzae was 0.9%–16.3%, 10.6%–12.5%, 3.1%–5.7% and 10.9%–20.5%, respectively.
Figure 2. Corrected 5-d mortality of four insect species after exposure to an ozone concentration of 0.42 g/m3 for different durations. a. Three strains of T. castaneum were exposed to ozone with 0 and 10 g of wheat; b. Two strains of O. surinamensis were exposed to ozone with 0 and 10 g of wheat; c. Two strains of S. oryzae were exposed to ozone with 0 and 10 g of wheat; d. Two strains of S. zeamais were exposed to ozone with 0 and 10 g of wheat. The 1-d mortality in the control treatments with 10 g of wheat for T. castaneum, O. surinamensis, S. zeamais and S. oryzae was 0–10.7%, 6.3%–15.2%, 6.0%–7.7% and 2.0%–3.9%, respectively; and the 5-d mortality in the control treatments with 0 g of wheat for T. castaneum, O. surinamensis, S. zeamais and S. oryzae was 0.9%–16.3%, 10.6%–12.5%, 3.1%–5.7% and 10.9%–20.5%, respectively.
Insects 08 00042 g002
Table 1. Sites and year of collection of field strains of four insect species and their susceptibility to discriminating doses of phosphine.
Table 1. Sites and year of collection of field strains of four insect species and their susceptibility to discriminating doses of phosphine.
SpeciesCounty, StateCommodityStrain aCollection YearSurvival (%) b
T. castaneumRussell, KansasWheatPD201145.0
Washington, KanasWheatCF201115.0
O. surinamensisDickinson, KansasWheatAB220111.3
S. zeamaisTexas cCornTX20116.7
S. oryzaeTexas cCornTX20119.3
a Strain refers to the location where insects were collected. PD, Paradise; CF, Clifton; AB2, Abilene; TX, Texas; b Phosphine resistance evaluations on these strains were conducted for the first time in July 2015; c County unknown.
Table 2. Exposure times required to achieve complete mortality (100%) after 5 d in adults of the four insect species exposed to an ozone concentration of 0.42 g/m3 in vials with 0 and 10 g of wheat.
Table 2. Exposure times required to achieve complete mortality (100%) after 5 d in adults of the four insect species exposed to an ozone concentration of 0.42 g/m3 in vials with 0 and 10 g of wheat.
SpeciesStrain a0 g Wheat (h)10 g Wheat (h)
T. castaneumLab b88
CF c810
PD d1010
O. surinamensisLab68
AB2108
S. zeamaisLab44
TX34
S. oryzaeLab43
TX33
a For strain, see footnote to Table 1; b The mean ± SE mortality of T. castaneum Lab strain with 0 and 10 g of wheat after 8 h of fumigation was 98.0% ± 2.0% and 96.0% ± 2.4%, respectively; c The mean ± SE mortality of T. castaneum CF strain with 0 and 10 g of wheat after 10 h of fumigation was 99.1% ± 0.9% and 97.0% ± 2.0%, respectively; d The mean ± SE mortality of T. castaneum PD strain with 0 and 10 g of wheat after 10 h of fumigation was 83.0% ± 4.6% and 95.1% ± 1.5%, respectively.
Table 3. Lethal time (LT50 and LT99) estimates for adults of four insect species based on 5-d mortality data after exposure to an ozone concentration of 0.42 g/m3 in vials with 10 g of wheat.
Table 3. Lethal time (LT50 and LT99) estimates for adults of four insect species based on 5-d mortality data after exposure to an ozone concentration of 0.42 g/m3 in vials with 10 g of wheat.
SpeciesStrain aN bMean ± SELethal Time (h, 95% CI)χ2 (df) c
InterceptSlopeLT50LT99
T. castaneumLab700−3.56 ± 1.225.18 ± 1.664.86 (3.17–6.98) 13.64 (8.64–92.79)4189.55 (33)
CF700−1.42 ± 0.203.11 ± 0.332.85 (2.42–3.29)15.91 (11.79–24.91)447.45 (33)
PD700−2.28 ± 0.403.26 ± 0.554.99 (4.05–6.23)25.81 (16.19–64.99)1019.84 (33)
O. surinamensisLab180−0.19 ± 0.162.97 ± 0.581.16 (0.83–1.43)7.07 (4.24–25.46)72.79 (9)
AB2760−1.21 ± 0.143.37 ± 0.252.28 (2.03–2.51)11.18 (9.33–14.16)195.84 (36)
S. zeamaisLab600−1.42 ± 0.205.03 ± 0.491.92 (1.72–2.11)5.56 (4.65–7.20)250.33 (28)
TX560−1.68 ± 0.226.91 ± 0.651.75 (1.61–1.88)3.80 (3.37–4.50)135.55 (26)
S. oryzaeLab580−1.34 ± 0.207.45 ± 0.691.51 (1.39–1.63)3.11 (2.76–3.65)149.12 (27)
TX580−1.55 ± 0.1012.85 ± 0.641.32 (1.28–1.36)2.00 (1.90–2.13)29.78 (27)
a For strain, see footnote to Table 1; b N = Total number of insects used in generating the probit regression estimates; c All χ2 values for the goodness-of-fit of the model to the data were significant (p < 0.0001), indicating the poor fit of the model to the data.
Table 4. Lethal time (LT50 and LT99) estimates for adults of four species based on 5-d mortality data after exposure to an ozone concentration of 0.42 g/m3 in vials with 0 g of wheat.
Table 4. Lethal time (LT50 and LT99) estimates for adults of four species based on 5-d mortality data after exposure to an ozone concentration of 0.42 g/m3 in vials with 0 g of wheat.
SpeciesStrain aN bMean ± SELethal Time (h, 95% CI)χ2 (df) c
InterceptSlopeLT50LT99
T. castaneumLab480−4.54 ± 1.156.69 ± 1.524.78 (3.77–5.59)10.65 (8.31–19.90)868.37 (22)
CF620−2.30 ± 0.294.00 ± 0.423.76 (3.31–4.21)14.35 (11.37–20.30)341.71 (29)
PD660−1.94 ± 0.202.89 ± 0.284.70 (4.18–5.27)29.89 (21.74–47.59)250.42 (31)
O. surinamensisLab8000.03 ± 0.133.61 ± 0.410.98 (0.80–1.14)4.33 (3.49–5.98)233.45 (38)
AB2800−1.18 ± 0.133.67 ± 0.252.10 (1.90–2.30)9.05 (7.64–11.25)208.33 (38)
S. zeamaisLab600−0.55 ± 0.134.62 ± 0.421.32 (1.18–1.44)4.20 (3.56–5.29)147.16 (28)
TX6000.38 ± 0.143.92 ± 0.570.80 (0.61–0.95)3.14 (2.52–4.59)162.42 (28)
S. oryzaeLab600−0.29 ± 0.127.14 ± 0.781.10 (1.02–1.17)2.32 (2.02–2.87)116.64 (28)
TX1600.16 ± 0.134.67 ± 0.990.92 (0.68–1.07)2.91 (2.07–8.17)32.13 (6)
a For strain, see footnote to Table 1; b N = Total number of insects used in generating the probit regression estimates; c All χ2 values for the goodness-of-fit of the model to the data were significant (p < 0.0001), indicating the poor fit of the model to the data.
Table 5. Comparison of LT99 values between 0 and 10 g of wheat based on 5-d mortality data.
Table 5. Comparison of LT99 values between 0 and 10 g of wheat based on 5-d mortality data.
SpeciesStrain aRatio (95% CI) b
T. castaneumLab1.26 (0.58–2.73)
CF1.11 (0.71–1.73)
PD1.16 (0.57–2.36)
O. surinamensisLab1.63 (0.82–3.25)
AB21.24 (0.94–1.63)
S. zeamaisLab1.32 (1.00–1.75) *
TX1.21 (0.89–1.64)
S. oryzaeLab1.34 (1.08–1.65) *
TX1.45 (0.96–2.20)
a For strain, see footnote to Table 1; b Vials with 10 g of wheat had higher LT99 values; * Significant (p < 0.05).
Table 6. Comparison of LT99 values between phosphine-susceptible and -resistant strains based on 5-d mortality data.
Table 6. Comparison of LT99 values between phosphine-susceptible and -resistant strains based on 5-d mortality data.
SpeciesStrains aRatio (95% CI)
0 g of Wheat10 g of Wheat
T. castaneumLab vs. CF1.18 (0.54–2.58)1.34 (0.87–2.05)
Lab vs. PD1.91 (0.76–4.83)2.79 (1.70–4.58) *
O. surinamensisAB2 vs. Lab1.58 (0.81–3.09)2.09 (1.53–2.87) *
S. zeamaisLab vs. TX1.46 (1.14–1.87) *1.34 (0.96–1.86)
S. oryzaeLab vs. TX b1.55 (1.34–1.79) *1.25 (0.80–1.95)
a For strain, see footnote to Table 1; Strain mentioned first had a higher LT99 value; b With 10 g of wheat, the Lab strain had a higher LT99 value than the TX strain, but with 0 g of wheat, the Lab strain had a lower LT99 value than the TX strain; * significant (p < 0.05).
Table 7. Adult progeny production (% reduction relative to control treatment) of laboratory and field strains of four insect species after exposure for various durations to an ozone concentration of 0.42 g/m3 in vials with 10 g of wheat a, b.
Table 7. Adult progeny production (% reduction relative to control treatment) of laboratory and field strains of four insect species after exposure for various durations to an ozone concentration of 0.42 g/m3 in vials with 10 g of wheat a, b.
HoursT. castaneumO. surinamensisS. zeamaisS. oryzae
LabCFPD cLabAB2LabTXLabTX
0115.8 ± 9.6a14.2 ± 1ab41 ± 7.9260.6 ± 32.2a355.8 ± 19.8a278.4 ± 16.1a160.4 ± 9.9a223 ± 30.1a190.8 ± 31.9a
170.8 ± 23.1a16.4 ± 2.9ab57 ± 20.8242.4 ± 48.4a229.4 ± 23.9ab215.4 ± 17.5a93.2 ± 10.9a102.4 ± 20.5a98.2 ± 36.7a
(38.9%)(−15.5%)(−39.0%)(7.0%)(35.5%)(22.6%)(41.9%)(54.1%)(48.5%)
258 ± 11.1a13.8 ± 3.2ab41.4 ± 6.949.4 ± 21.1c149.8 ± 7.5ab125.6 ± 24.9a56.6 ± 16.4a4.4 ± 3.1b1.8 ± 0.9b
(49.9%)(2.8%)(−1.0%)(81.0%)(57.9%)(54.9%)(64.7%)(98.0%)(99.1%)
345 ± 11.1a46.4 ± 6.5a35.8 ± 8.969.4 ± 20.5b92 ± 23.5b103 ± 12a4.0 ± 2.3b1.4 ± 0.5b0.6 ± 0.7b
(61.1%)(−226.8%)(12.7%)(73.4%)(74.1%)(63.0%)(97.5%)(99.4%)(99.7%)
4 (5) d65.2 ± 19.8a54.4 ± 10.1a66 ± 15.32.4 ± 1.4cd3.8 ± 1.2c4.8 ± 2.8b3.8 ± 2.1b2.0 ± 0.9b1.2 ± 0.6b
(43.7%)(−283.1%)(−61.0%)(99.1%)(98.9%)(98.3%)(97.6%)(99.1%)(99.4%)
65.6 ± 3.4b10.6 ± 6.7b60.6 ± 15.92.4 ± 1.2cd1.8 ± 0.6c0 ± 0.3c1.2 ± 0.5b1.4 ± 0.5b4.2 ± 5.0b
(95.2%)(25.4%)(−47.8%)(99.1%)(99.5%)(100%)(99.3%)(99.4%)(97.8%)
88.4 ± 8.4b29.2 ± 11.9ab46.4 ± 12.62.6 ± 0.9cd0.4 ± 0.5c1.0 ± 0.3bc0.2 ± 0.4b3.8 ± 1.2b0.4 ± 0.2b
(92.7%)(−105.6%)(−13.2%)(99.0%)(99.9%)(99.6%)(99.9%)(98.3%)(99.8%)
103.6 ± 3.6b19.8 ± 17.6ab40.6 ± 10.81.2 ± 0.9cd0 ± 0c2.4 ± 1.2b0.2 ± 0.2b0.8 ± 0.7b0 ± 0b
(96.9%)(−39.4%)(1.0%)(99.5%)(100%)(98.9%)(99.9%)(99.6%)(100.1%)
12- e- e- e0.4 ± 0.8d0.6 ± 0.4c- e- e- e- e
(99.8%)(99.8%)
F-value12.093.380.3517.2681.73123.2421.9338.9021.31
df7, 327, 327, 328, 368, 367, 327, 327, 327, 32
p-value<0.00010.00810.9256<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
a For strain, see footnote to Table 1; b Means by strains followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05, by the Bonferroni t-tests); c There was no significant difference in progeny produced in the control and ozone treatments (p > 0.05); d The exposure time for T. castaneum was 5 h and for the rest of the species was 4 h; e Samples were not exposed for 12 h.
Table 8. Adult progeny production (% reduction relative to control treatment) of laboratory and field strains of four insect species after exposure for various durations to an ozone concentration of 0.42 g/m3 in vials with 0 g of wheat a, b
Table 8. Adult progeny production (% reduction relative to control treatment) of laboratory and field strains of four insect species after exposure for various durations to an ozone concentration of 0.42 g/m3 in vials with 0 g of wheat a, b
HoursT. castaneum O. surinamensisS. zeamais S. oryzae
LabCFPD cLabAB2LabTXLabTX
047.6 ± 26.8abc11.4 ± 3.7abc39.8 ± 4.6339.6 ± 17.7a194.8 ± 23a285.8 ± 11a179.6 ± 29.3a162.8 ± 22.8a114.6 ± 12.8a
173.6 ± 17.2a16.2 ± 2.4abc65 ± 13.4282.2 ± 52a271.6 ± 18.1a47 ± 23.1b7.8 ± 3.6b65.4 ± 9.3b11.8 ± 6.7b
(−54.6%)(−42.1%)(−63.3%)(16.9%)(−39.4%)(83.6%)(95.7%)(59.8%)(89.7%)
246.6 ± 12.9ab24.4 ± 9.2abc89.2 ± 13.6138.2 ± 57.1ab129.6 ± 23.1a49.6 ± 28.4b0.8 ± 0.2bc0 ± 0c0 ± 0c
(2.1%)(−114%)(−124.1%)(59.3%)(33.5%)(82.6%)(99.6%)(100%)(100%)
346.2 ± 8.4a69.6 ± 6.7a92.4 ± 15.529 ± 25.8bc42.6 ± 16.3b15.4 ± 14.9b0 ± 0c0 ± 0c0 ± 0c
(2.9%)(–510.5%)(–132.2%)(91.5%)(78.1%)(94.6%)(100%)(100%)(100%)
4 (5) d45.8 ± 14.1a55.6 ± 19.8ab95.6 ± 11.31 ± 0.7c0.6 ± 0.7c0 ± 0b0.4 ± 0.2c0 ± 0c0 ± 0c
(3.8%)(–387.7%)(–140.2%)(99.7%)(99.7%)(100%)(99.8%)(100%)(100%)
611.2 ± 11.2bc46.8 ± 15.9ab90.8 ± 17.80.6 ± 0.7c0.8 ± 0.6c0.2 ± 0.4b0.4 ± 0.4c0 ± 0c0 ± 0c
(76.5%)(–310.5%)(–128.1%)(99.8%)(99.6%)(99.9%)(99.8%)(100%)(100%)
86 ± 6c12.6 ± 7.7bc86 ± 19.81.6 ± 0.9c0.4 ± 0.5c0 ± 0.3b0.4 ± 0.2c0 ± 0c0 ± 0c
(87.4%)(-10.5%)(–116.1%)(99.5%)(99.8%)(100%)(99.8%)(100%)(100%)
102.6 ± 2.6c0.6 ± 0.5c49.4 ± 140.4 ± 0.5c0.4 ± 0.5c0 ± 0c0 ± 0c0 ± 0c0 ± 0c
(94.5%)(94.7%)(–24.1%)(99.9%)(99.8%)(100%)(100%)(100%)(100%)
12- e- e- e0.6 ± 0.7c0.4 ± 0.5c- e- e- e- e
(99.8%)(99.8%)
F-value7.114.341.9225.2859.9612.3650.551034.9345.86
df7, 327, 327, 328, 368, 367, 327, 327, 327, 32
p-value<0.00010.00180.0987<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
a For strain, see footnote to Table 1; b Means by strains followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05, by the Bonferroni t-tests); c There was no significant difference in progeny produced in the control and ozone treatments (p > 0.05); d The exposure time for T. castaneum was 5 h and for the rest of the species was 4 h; e Samples were not exposed for 12 h.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

E, X.; Subramanyam, B.; Li, B. Efficacy of Ozone against Phosphine Susceptible and Resistant Strains of Four Stored-Product Insect Species. Insects 2017, 8, 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects8020042

AMA Style

E X, Subramanyam B, Li B. Efficacy of Ozone against Phosphine Susceptible and Resistant Strains of Four Stored-Product Insect Species. Insects. 2017; 8(2):42. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects8020042

Chicago/Turabian Style

E, Xinyi, Bhadriraju Subramanyam, and Beibei Li. 2017. "Efficacy of Ozone against Phosphine Susceptible and Resistant Strains of Four Stored-Product Insect Species" Insects 8, no. 2: 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects8020042

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop