Next Article in Journal
Efficacy of Chlorantraniliprole in Controlling Structural Infestations of the Eastern Subterranean Termite in the USA
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Efficiency of BG-Sentinel Traps Baited with Mice, Mouse-Litter, and CO2 Lures for Field Sampling of Male and Female Aedes albopictus Mosquitoes
Previous Article in Journal
Short-Range Responses of the Kissing Bug Triatoma rubida (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) to Carbon Dioxide, Moisture, and Artificial Light
Previous Article in Special Issue
Wavelength and Polarization Affect Phototaxis of the Asian Citrus Psyllid
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genitalic Differentiations in Neoleucinodes elegantalis (Gueneé) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) Associated with Solanaceae Crops in Ecuador

1
Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIAP), Programa Nacional de Fruticultura, Tumbaco, Quito 170184, Ecuador
2
Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (CORPOICA), Centro de Investigación Obonuco, Km 5, Vía Pasto, Pasto 520038, Colombia
3
Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Agropeuarias, Universidad de las Américas (UDLA), José Queri, Quito 170137, Ecuador
4
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Centro Internacional de Zoonosis. Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito 170521, Ecuador
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2017, 8(3), 91; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects8030091
Submission received: 12 July 2017 / Revised: 22 August 2017 / Accepted: 25 August 2017 / Published: 31 August 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrated Pest Management)

Abstract

:
Neoleucinodes elegantalis (Guenée) is an oligophagous species of plants in the Solanaceae family that has a broad geographical distribution in the tropical zones of South America. It is the most important insect pest of naranjilla (Solanum quitoense Lamarck), a crop grown in threatened areas of the tropical old-growth forest in Ecuador. In this study, two host-specific populations of N. elegantalis were collected from infested fruit of naranjilla and tree tomato (Solanum betaceum Cavanilles) in different locations. Sexually virgin adult insects (93 females and 103 males) were dissected to extract their genitalia to measure 12 morphological variables in females and six in males, resulting in six and four informative variables respectively. Using univariate and multivariate analysis of variance, it was found that the Solanaceous host was the main factor differentiating the area measurements of the seventh abdominal segment and ostium bursae in female genitalia, and cornuti length in male genitalia. Principal components generated with these measurements were employed in a logistic regression model for the classification of the Solanaceous host. Female genitalia of individuals from S. betaceum showed significantly larger ostium bursae relative to female genitalia from S. quitoense. For males, individuals collected from S. betaceum showed longer cornuti length than samples collected from S. quitoense. The results suggest genotypic differentiation according to the Solanaceous host or phenotypic plasticity in N. elegantalis. Further molecular and bio-geographical studies are needed to properly differentiate N. elegantalis populations that would help in the control of this pest.

1. Introduction

Recent studies on the biology of the fruit borer Neoleucinodes elegantalis (Guenée, 1984) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) carried out in Latin America, have found that this pest is an oligophagous species of plants in the Solanaceae family, and is distributed in almost all countries of South America infesting various crops of economic importance, such as S. lycopersicum (tomato), S. betaceum (tree tomato), S. capsicum (pepper), and S. quitoense (naranjilla) [1,2,3,4].
According to Capps (1948), this species has the following characters: a simple antenna; slightly annulate; labial palpus upturned; remarkably shorter maxillary palpus in males than in females; frons evenly rounded; a posterodorsal area of the head with white scales predominant; a dark fuscous brown thorax (dorsal view) that is white in ventral view; an abdomen with a conspicuous white band composed of all the first and variable portions of the second a third segments; white hyalinate wings with conspicuous squamous areas of cinnamon brown [5], as shown in Figure 1.
In Ecuador, this pest is present in all the regions where naranjilla (S. quitoense) is grown. The fruit borer directly affects the fruit pulp by boring and feeding on the fruit mesocarp, producing galleries inside the developing berries [4] resulting in significant losses in production and fruit quality.
N. elegantalis is endemic in tropical rainforest regions of Ecuador, specifically in the Andean foothills where fruit of native Solanaceae species such as naranjilla and tree tomato can be found. In fact, nearly 100% of naranjilla is grown in these areas. Therefore, farmers are obligated to apply insecticides on the fruit, and in many cases to look for new places in old-growth forest to relocate their orchards. As a result, serious damage to this ecosystem is created because of agricultural activities.
There is evidence that N. elegantalis has a dichotomous behavior with respect to the preference of host species; it can choose one or the other but not both [6]. Studies in Colombia have identified four biotypes of N. elegantalis, correlated with different Solanaceae hosts. Those biotypes were separated by the localization in the Eastern and the Western Colombian Andes [6]. Consequently, we hypothesize that different biotypes of N. elegantalis exist in Ecuador due to host specificity in different ecological areas, due to sympatric and/or allopatric separation of this species. Thus, the present study aims to evaluate the possibility of different biotypes of N. elegantalis in Ecuador, using genitalia morphometric measures of virgin adult specimens of N. elegantalis found in two Solanaceae fruit crops, S. quitoense and S. betaceum, collected from different areas of Ecuador.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Preparation

Infested fruits of S. quitoense from commercial orchards and S. betaceum from abandoned orchards that were close to S. quitoense orchards were collected with larvae inside and were sent to the Entomology laboratory in INIAP-Tumbaco. We analyzed 196 N. elegantalis (103 males, 93 females) collected from different S. quitoense and S. betaceum crop areas located in the Eastern and Western foothills of the Ecuadorian Andean rainforest and were analyzed to identify potential morphological intraspecific differences. Genitalia were used because such characters are much more conserved than external characters, and because they are insignificantly influenced by environmental factors [7,8].
Infected fruits were placed in growth chambers with controlled environmental conditions (temperature 22 ± 1 °C, 55% relative humidity and a photoperiod of 12 h of light and 12 h of darkness) to complete their larval, pupal and adult development.
N. elegantalis were collected from eight localities in five provinces of Ecuador (Table 1). Both S. quitoense and S. betaceum were found together only in Los Bancos, Pichincha, and in El Chaco, Napo; in all other localities, N. elegantalis was found only on S. quitoense (Table 1).

2.2. Slide Preparation and Measurement

The adult moths were sacrificed in a hermetic container with ethyl acetate gas for about 60 s. Later, genitalia were prepared using the protocol described by Hardwick in 1950 [9]. Genitalia slides were photographed using an Infinity 1 digital camera attached to an Olympus SZ stereomicroscope; the measures of the variables were recorded using the software infinity analyze, release 6.2.0.
In relation to male genitalia, the characters measured were the phallus length (PL), cornuti length (CL), valva length (VL), valva width (VW), and vinculum area (VA), plus the fibula–valva apex length (Figure 2). With the original measures of the structures of the genitalia, three descriptive variables were formed. The variable (RLAV) expresses the proportion of the length of the valva relative to its basal width, using the VL valva length/BVL basal valva length relationship. Fibula position in the valva (FPV) expresses the ratio of distance from the fibula to total valva length, using the RBFV/VL relationship. Ratio cornuti length (RCL) based on a relation with phallus length (PL) was obtained by determining the PL/CL relationship. Finally, vinculum area (VA) was determined by calculating the hexagonal area.
With respect to female genitalia, all variables were measured following the method proposed by Diaz et al. 2015 [6]. Ductus bursae length (DBL) was measured from the constriction of the ostium bursae to the beginning of the corpus bursae; apophysis posterioris length (APL) was estimated as the relation between apophysis posterioris and the right anterior wing length (LRAW) where RAPL = APL/LRAW; apophysis anterioris length (RAAL) was measured as the relation between apophysis anterioris (AAL) and the right anterior wing length (RWL) where RAAL = AAL/RWL. Ostium bursae area (OBAr) was calculated using the isosceles triangle area formula; the seventh abdominal segment area (SASA) was determined by calculating the trapezium area and finally the corpus bursae (CBA) area was determined by calculating the elliptical area (Figure 3). The areas of the last three variables were automatically calculated by the software using the formulas described above.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data analyses were performed using univariate ANOVA and multivariate MANOVA statistical analyses. Outlier detection was performed using Mahalanobis distance. Barlett’s test was applied for each variable to examine variance homogeneity. Likewise, ANOVA and MANOVA analysis was performed to find significant differences among host and zones considering the full set of variables for females and males. F-test from Pialli’s trace statistics was chosen to evaluate individual significant factors from the MANOVA. Classification of the specimens was done using Principal component logistic regression, using eight variables for females and five variables for males [10]. The size effect of orthogonal linear compose variables (component dimensions) was tested for each Solanaceous host (S. betaceum or S. quitoense) usin FactoMiner package [11]. The statistical significance of each regression parameter was set at p < 0.05. All analyses were done using R software 3.3.1 (https://www.r-project.org).

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of Variance for Solanaceae Plant and Zone

For male genitalia, significant differences were found for host plant factor in the cornuti length (RCL) in the ANOVA analysis (Table 2). Additionally, there were differences for the zone factor in the variable RCL where specimens collected in Eastern Andes lands presented a more reduced length for this variable (Figure 4).
MANOVA analysis of males of N. elegantalis found highly significant differences between host plant and zone variables, (Table 3). These findings are consistent with the study by Díaz et al. 2015 in Colombia [6], where the source of food was the main factor that discriminated the morphological differentiation among the female population of N. elegantalis, giving support to sympatric differentiation. In this study, zone was also found as an important factor for male differentiation. In both cases, sympatric differentiation seems to be the main force in the genetic dynamics of this species, as the source of food seems to determinate the size of the morphological structures. Food source represented the highest source of variation among the populations studied and differentiated four population groups of N. elegantalis in Ecuador.
ANOVA analysis of female genitalia (Table 4) variables found statistical differences (p < 0.05) for Solanaceous host for two out of six evaluated variables, OBAr and SASA (Figure 5). These results are consistent with the results obtained by Díaz et al. 2015, which mention that SASA shows the highest variability, suggesting that this variable might be useful as a morphological marker to differentiate from which host the individuals of this species come [5,12].
On the other hand, the CBA variable showed statistical differences (p < 0.05) for the interaction between host and zone effect. For the zone, there were no mean differences, which suggests that climatological similarities between zones do not cause differentiation among individuals.
MANOVA analysis found significant differences only for the Solanaceous host between female populations from S. betaceum and S. quitoense (Table 5), suggesting that sympatric differentiation may take place in contrast to allopatric differentiation. A possible explanation for this nonstructural geographical differentiation of N. elegantalis might be the relative facility and connectivity between Eastern and Western sides of the Andes in Ecuador. According to Díaz et al. 2013 [1], in Colombia, there were geographic differentiations of N. elegantalis likely due to deeper isolation of different biotypes in comparison with the mobility among different areas that exist in Ecuador.

3.2. Principal Component Host Classification

Principal component logistic regression for male genitalia of N. elegantalis used in the classification of specimens coming from the two Solanaceae hosts (Table 6), resulted in statistical significance for PC3.
Table 7 presents the loadings of this component, which shows the contrast between VA and RBFV. Figure 6 represents the dispersion of measures for this component of the individuals in both hosts and clearly shows that individuals from tree tomato have larger size than individuals from naranjilla.
The principal component logistic regression for female genitalia of N. elegantalis, in the two Solanaceous hosts (Table 8), identified two significant components, PC 3 and PC 6, with the results of each variable shown in Figure 7A. PC3 shows the contrast between CBA vs. OBAr, and DBL vs. SASA (Table 9). PC6 shows the contrast of RAAL between females on naranjilla with bigger RAAL in comparison to females on tree tomato. Figure 7B shows the position of females hosted in tree tomato (red dots) and females hosted in naranjilla (black dots); these components show that tree tomato females have a bigger SASA and OBAr and smaller CBA and RAPL. Figure 5 shows that the areas occupied by OBAr and SASA are bigger than other structures, showing that females on tree tomato have a larger capacity in the abdominal region.

4. Discussion

Most researchers identify species using operational methods, mainly based on phenotypic morphological evidence or on molecular phylogenetics [13,14]. This has generated a tendency for taxonomists to divide allopatric populations of the species into distinct species, based on minor morphological or karyotypic differences [8,13]. The genetic divergence and evolution of new species within the geographic range of a single population contrasts with the well-established doctrine that speciation occurs when populations become geographically isolated [15]. Although there is important theoretical support for sympatric speciation [16], this mode of diversification remains controversial, at least in part because there are few well-supported examples [17]. In those cases, evidence of changes in the morphometry of genitalia in both sexes of N. elegantalis was found according to the host, given that the reproduction in each one of both biotypes may be facilitated by partner discrimination and the avoidance of mating interference. Similar findings analyzing genitalia have been suggested in other species such as snails, in northern Okinawa Island, Japan [18].
Evidence of sympatric speciation of N. elegantalis using morphological characters related to host specificity was also found in this study. This information will help to understand the movement of this insect between fields, orchards and regions of Ecuador. Furthermore, our results can be used to distinguish invasive populations from Colombia, as all variables, except in ArOB Ecuadorian individuals, show smaller structures than Colombian specimens, taking the study of Díaz and collaborators in 2015 as a reference [6]. The results of this study will contribute to control strategies such as the use of pheromones according to the ethological behavior of this moth. In the future, molecular studies could be carried out to determine if morphometric differences are caused by genetic divergence or phenotypic plasticity because individuals belonging to the same species (genotype) can show different morphometric structures depending on environmental conditions.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the Solanaceous host was found to be a factor that may discriminate populations of N. elegantalis based on genital morphological differentiation. Among the Solanaceae fruit crops, S. quitoense is the main host for this species, however S. betaceum might be considered as an alternate host in Ecuador. The size of the genital structures represented the major source of variation among the studied populations infecting S. quitoense and S. betaceum; this made it possible to identify two population groups (biotypes) of N. elegantalis, both in males and females. This discrimination of biotypes is important for the control strategies that can be applied to moths of N. elegantalis in critical places such as the Andean foothills.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank “Fondo Regional de Tecnología Agropecuaria” (FONTAGRO) for funding this research through the Project “Fundamentos para el desarrollo de estrategias de control biológico del perforador del fruto Neoleucinodes elegantalis en fruta solanáceas andinas exóticas”. We thank Charlie Barnes from Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias for his suggestions for editing this manuscript. We thank project “Biocontrol for Sustainable Farming Systems, Ecuador-MFAT New Zeland” for funding the publication of this manuscript.

Author Contributions

Ana Díaz and Wilson Vásquez conceived and designed the experiment; Michelle Noboa performed the experiment; Lenin Ron analyzed the data; Michelle Noboa and William Viera wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Díaz, A.; Suárez, H.; Gallego, G.; Saldamando, C.; Tohme, J. Geographic differentiation of Colombian Neoleucinodes elegantalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) Haplotypes: Evidence for Solanaceae host plant association and holdridge life zones for genetic differentiation. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2013, 106, 586–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Díaz, A.E.; Solis, A.; Brochero, H. Distribución geográfica de Neoleucinodes elegantalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) en Colombia. Rev. Colomb. Entomol. 2011, 37, 71–74. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  3. Jaffé, K.; Mirás, B.; Cabrera, A. Mate selection in the moth Neoleucinodes elegantalis: Evidence for a supernormal chemical stimulus in sexual attraction. Anim. Behav. 2007, 73, 727–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Salas, J.; Alvarez, C.; Parra, A. Contribución al conocimiento de la ecología del perforador del fruto del tomate Neoleucinodes elegantalis Guenée (Lepidoptera: Pyraustidae). Agron. Trop. 1991, 41, 275–283. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  5. Capps, H.W. Status of the pyraustid moths of the genus Leucinodes in the New World, with descriptions of new genera and species. Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus. 1948, 98, 69–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Díaz, A.; González, R.; Solis, A.; Saldamando, C. Evidence of Sexual Selection in Neoleucinodes elegantalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae): Correlation of female moth genitalia and Solanaceae host fruit size. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2015, 108, 272–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cesaroni, D.; Lucarelli, M.; Allori, P.; Russo, F.; Sbordoni, V. Patterns of evolution and multidimensional systematics in graylings (Lepidoptera: Hipparchia). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1994, 52, 101–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dapporto, L. Geometric morphometrics reveal male genitalia differences in the Lasiommata megera/paramegaera complex (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) and the lack of a predicted hybridization area in the Tuscan Archipelago. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 2008, 46, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hardwick, D. Preparation of Slide Mounts of Lepidopterous Genitalia. Can. Entomol. 1950, 82, 231–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sokal, R.; Rohlf, J. Introduction to Biostatistics; Dover Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2000; p. 362. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lê, S.; Josse, J.; Husson, F. Factominer: An R Package For multivariate analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 2008, 25, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Eberhard, W. Evaluating Models of Sexual Selection: Genitalia as a test case. Am. Nat. 1993, 142, 564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mallet, J. A species definition for the modern synthesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1995, 10, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Agapow, P.M.; Bininda-Emonds, O.R.; Crandall, K.A.; Gittleman, J.L.; Mace, G.M.; Marshall, J.C.; Purvis, A. The impact of species concept on biodiversity studies. Q. Rev. Biol. 2004, 79, 161–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Munday, P.L.; Van Herwerden, L.; Dudgeon, C.L. Evidence for sympatric speciation by host shift in the sea. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14, 1498–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Via, S. Sympatric speciation in animals: The ugly duckling grows up. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16, 381–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schluter, D. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2000; pp. 191–200. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kameda, Y.; Kawakita, A.; Kato, M. Reproductive character displacement in genital morphology in Satsuma Land Snails. Am. Nat. 2009, 173, 689–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Adults of N. elegantalis; (A) male; (B) female; (C) labial palpus of male adult; and (D) labial palpus of female adult.
Figure 1. Adults of N. elegantalis; (A) male; (B) female; (C) labial palpus of male adult; and (D) labial palpus of female adult.
Insects 08 00091 g001
Figure 2. Male genitalia (A) Anatomic structures (B) Measures: PL = phallus length CL = cornuti length; VL = valva length; VA = Vinculum area; RBFV = ratio of the fibula position in the valve; BVL = basal valva length.
Figure 2. Male genitalia (A) Anatomic structures (B) Measures: PL = phallus length CL = cornuti length; VL = valva length; VA = Vinculum area; RBFV = ratio of the fibula position in the valve; BVL = basal valva length.
Insects 08 00091 g002
Figure 3. Female genitalia (A) Anatomic structures and (B) Measures: AAL = apophysis anterioris length; APL = apophysis posterioris length; SASA = seventh abdominal segment area; DBL = ductus bursae length; CBA = corpus bursae area; OBAr = ostium bursae area.
Figure 3. Female genitalia (A) Anatomic structures and (B) Measures: AAL = apophysis anterioris length; APL = apophysis posterioris length; SASA = seventh abdominal segment area; DBL = ductus bursae length; CBA = corpus bursae area; OBAr = ostium bursae area.
Insects 08 00091 g003
Figure 4. Morphometric differences in male genitalia of N. elegantalis from two Solanaceous hosts; (A) naranjilla (S. quitoense); and (B) tree tomato (S. betaceum).
Figure 4. Morphometric differences in male genitalia of N. elegantalis from two Solanaceous hosts; (A) naranjilla (S. quitoense); and (B) tree tomato (S. betaceum).
Insects 08 00091 g004
Figure 5. Morphometric differences in female genitalia of N. elegantalis from two Solanaceous hosts; (A) naranjilla (S. quitoense) and (B) tree tomato (S. betaceum).
Figure 5. Morphometric differences in female genitalia of N. elegantalis from two Solanaceous hosts; (A) naranjilla (S. quitoense) and (B) tree tomato (S. betaceum).
Insects 08 00091 g005
Figure 6. Biplot and boxplot of PC3 and PC1 components in the classification of N. elegantalis males hosted in two Solanaceae families (S. quitoense and S. betaceum).
Figure 6. Biplot and boxplot of PC3 and PC1 components in the classification of N. elegantalis males hosted in two Solanaceae families (S. quitoense and S. betaceum).
Insects 08 00091 g006
Figure 7. Principal component analysis; (A) Biplot of PC3 and PC6; (B) PCA plot components in the classification of N. elegantalis females hosted in two Solanaceae families (S. quitoense and S. betaceum).
Figure 7. Principal component analysis; (A) Biplot of PC3 and PC6; (B) PCA plot components in the classification of N. elegantalis females hosted in two Solanaceae families (S. quitoense and S. betaceum).
Insects 08 00091 g007
Table 1. Sampling areas of the study in Ecuador, South America.
Table 1. Sampling areas of the study in Ecuador, South America.
LocalityProvinceZoneAltitude (Masl)Host PlantNumber of Specimens
FemaleMale
Los BancosPichinchaWestern Andes681S. quitoense1110
S. betaceum816
Rio NegroTungurahuaEastern Andes1242S. quitoense46
El ChacoNapoEastern Andes1600S. quitoense87
S. betaceum66
Awayaku735S. quitoense911
Río verdeCarchiWestern Andes814S. quitoense89
PaloraMorona SantiagoEastern Andes1358S. quitoense99
Guagua SumacoNapo1053S. quitoense1311
CumandáNapo1123S. quitoense911
Table 2. ANOVA test for the descriptive variables of the male genitalia of N. elegantalis collected in two hosts (S. quitoense and S. betaceum) and two zones (Western Andes and Eastern Andes).
Table 2. ANOVA test for the descriptive variables of the male genitalia of N. elegantalis collected in two hosts (S. quitoense and S. betaceum) and two zones (Western Andes and Eastern Andes).
Variables
VARLAVFPVRCL
Source of variation F. calc.Pr (>F)F. calc.Pr (>F)F. calc.Pr (>F)F. calc.Pr (>F)
Zone11.260.261.510.151.330.222.070.04 **
Host plant12.410.120.280.591.020.3116.670.00 **
Host plant × zone10.050.822.250.130.330.561.580.21
Error98
Total101
Average (mm) 2.110.642.072.96
C.V. (%) 22.163.826.813.53
Note: F. calc. = F calculated value; Pr (>F) = p value; C.V. = coefficient of variation; ** = high statistical significance; VA = Vinculum area; RLAV = relation between valva length and basal valva length; FPV = ratio of the fibula position in the valve; RCL = relation between phallus length and cornuti length.
Table 3. Decision criteria for the multivariate variance analysis (MANOVA) in the metrics of male genitalia of N. elegantalis.
Table 3. Decision criteria for the multivariate variance analysis (MANOVA) in the metrics of male genitalia of N. elegantalis.
Source of VariationGLPillai CriteriaApprox FPr (>F)
Host plant10.17635.1370.0008 **
Zone10.09832.61880.0396 *
Host plant × zone10.01940.47710.7524
Error99
Note: GL = freedom degrees; Pr = value p greater than F; * statistical difference; ** = high statistical significance.
Table 4. ANOVA test for the descriptive variables of the female genitalia of N. elegantalis collected in two hosts (S. quitoense and tree S. betaceum) and two zones (Western Andes and Eastern Andes).
Table 4. ANOVA test for the descriptive variables of the female genitalia of N. elegantalis collected in two hosts (S. quitoense and tree S. betaceum) and two zones (Western Andes and Eastern Andes).
Variables
DBLRAPLRAALOBArSASACBA
Source of variationDfF. calc.Pr (>F)F. calc.Pr (>F)F. calc.Pr (>F)F. calc.Pr (>F)F. calc.Pr (>F)F. calc.Pr (>F)
Zone10.280.5973.8460.0533.7370.0560.030.8591.0570.3061.0760.302
Host plant10.0480.8260.0020.9570.3960.538.120.005 **4.5810.035 *1.7220.193
Host plant × zone11.7280.1920.890.3480.0440.8330.0140.9041.1120.2944.4870.037 *
Error88
Total92
Average 2.2840.0830.1150.0872.1710.237
C.V. (%) 19.43812.88515.14121.56114.71145.060
Note: F. calc. = F calculated value; Pr (>F) = p value; C.V. = coefficient of variation; * statistical difference; ** = high statistical significance; AAL = apophysis anterioris length; APL = apophysis posterioris length; SASA = seventh abdominal segment area; DBL = ductus bursae length; CBA = corpus bursae area; OBAr = ostium bursae area.
Table 5. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) in the metrics of female genitalia of N. elegantalis, collected in two hosts (S. quitoense and S. betaceum) and two Zones (Western Andes and Eastern Andes).
Table 5. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) in the metrics of female genitalia of N. elegantalis, collected in two hosts (S. quitoense and S. betaceum) and two Zones (Western Andes and Eastern Andes).
Source of VariationGLCriteria of PillaiApprox FPr (>F)
Host plant10.19042.97990.0114 *
Zone10.11581.65960.1425
Host plant × zone10.11991.72660.1262
Error81
Note: GL = freedom degrees; Pr (>F) = p value greater than F; * = statistical significance.
Table 6. Principal Components (PC3) and the anatomical structures of males of N. elegantalis.
Table 6. Principal Components (PC3) and the anatomical structures of males of N. elegantalis.
ComponentEstimateStd. Errorz Valuep Value
Intercept−1.470.29−4.940.001 **
PC 10.260.231.110.264
PC 2−0.030.28−0.110.908
PC 3−1.210.35−3.450.005 **
PC 40.110.310.360.716
Note: Std. Error = standard error; ** = high statistical significance.
Table 7. Principal Components (PC3) and the anatomical structures of males of N. elegantalis.
Table 7. Principal Components (PC3) and the anatomical structures of males of N. elegantalis.
VariablePC 3
VA−0.56
RCL0.71
RLAV0.41
FPV0.37
Note: VA = Vinculum area; RCL = relation between phallus length and cornuti length; RLAV = relation between VL valva length and BVL basal valva length; FPV = ratio of the fibula position in the valve.
Table 8. Logistic regression estimates between the classifications components of N. elegantalis females–host plant and the size of the Principal Component structures.
Table 8. Logistic regression estimates between the classifications components of N. elegantalis females–host plant and the size of the Principal Component structures.
ComponentEstimateStd. Errorz Valuep Value
Intercept−2.340.45−5.160.0001 **
PC 10.090.240.390.695
PC 2−0.270.29−0.920.352
PC 3−0.910.40−2.260.023 *
PC 40.600.361.650.098
PC 50.520.381.370.167
PC 6−1.140.49−2.300.021 *
Note: Std. Error = standard error; * statistical significance; ** = high statistical significance.
Table 9. Principal Components (PC3 and PC6) and the anatomical structures of females of N. elegantalis.
Table 9. Principal Components (PC3 and PC6) and the anatomical structures of females of N. elegantalis.
VariablesPC3PC6
DBL−0.290.00
RAAL0.000.74
RAPL0.29−0.50
OBAr−0.480.00
SASA−0.50−0.44
CBA0.520.00
Note: DBL = ductus bursae length; RAAL = apophysis anterioris length; RAPL = apophysis posterioris length; OBAr = ostium bursae area; SASA = seventh abdominal segment area; CBA = corpus bursae area.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Noboa, M.; Viera, W.; Díaz, A.; Vásquez, W.; Ron, L. Genitalic Differentiations in Neoleucinodes elegantalis (Gueneé) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) Associated with Solanaceae Crops in Ecuador. Insects 2017, 8, 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects8030091

AMA Style

Noboa M, Viera W, Díaz A, Vásquez W, Ron L. Genitalic Differentiations in Neoleucinodes elegantalis (Gueneé) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) Associated with Solanaceae Crops in Ecuador. Insects. 2017; 8(3):91. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects8030091

Chicago/Turabian Style

Noboa, Michelle, William Viera, Ana Díaz, Wilson Vásquez, and Lenin Ron. 2017. "Genitalic Differentiations in Neoleucinodes elegantalis (Gueneé) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) Associated with Solanaceae Crops in Ecuador" Insects 8, no. 3: 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects8030091

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop