Next Article in Journal
Microstructure and Strengthening-Toughening Mechanism of Nitrogen-Alloyed 4Cr5Mo2V Hot-Working Die Steel
Next Article in Special Issue
Processing Map of NiTiNb Shape Memory Alloy Subjected to Plastic Deformation at High Temperatures
Previous Article in Journal
Surface Characterization and Corrosion Resistance of 36Cr-Ni-Mo4 Steel Coated by WC-Co Cermet Electrode Using Micro-Electro Welding
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deformation Behavior and Microstructure Evolution of NiTiCu Shape Memory Alloy Subjected to Plastic Deformation at High Temperatures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microstructure, Mechanical Property, and Phase Transformation of Quaternary NiTiFeNb and NiTiFeTa Shape Memory Alloys

1
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
2
College of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2017, 7(8), 309; https://doi.org/10.3390/met7080309
Submission received: 3 July 2017 / Revised: 31 July 2017 / Accepted: 9 August 2017 / Published: 12 August 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shape Memory Alloys 2017)

Abstract

:
Based on ternary Ni45Ti51.8Fe3.2 (at %) shape memory alloy (SMA), Nb and Ta elements are added to an NiTiFe SMA by replacing Ni element, and consequently quaternary Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1 and Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1 (at %) SMAs are fabricated. The microstructure, mechanical property, and phase transformation of NiTiFeNb and NiTiFeTa SMAs are further investigated. Ti2Ni and β-Nb phases can be observed in NiTiFeNb SMA, whereas Ti2Ni and Ni3Ti phases can be captured in NiTiFeTa SMA. As compared to NiTiFe SMA, quaternary NiTiFeNb and NiTiFeTa SMAs possess the higher strength, since solution strengthening plays a considerable role. NiTiFeNb and NiTiFeTa SMAs exhibit a one-step transformation from B2 austenite to B19’ martensite during cooling, but they experience a two-step transformation of B19’-R-B2 during heating.

1. Introduction

NiTi shape memory alloys (SMAs) have deserved increasing attention in the domain of engineering since they possess shape memory effect and superelasticity. In general, phase transformation temperature and mechanical property are the two critical factors influencing the application of NiTi SMA in engineering [1,2,3]. In particular, a third element can be added to the binary NiTi SMA so as to change its phase transformation temperature and mechanical property [4,5]. As a consequence, typical ternary NiTi-based SMAs, such as NiTiCu, NiTiNb, and NiTiFe, have gone toward the engineering application. For instance, NiTiCu SMA possesses a narrow transformation temperature hysteresis, so it can be used in actuators [6,7,8]. However, NiTiNb SMA possesses a broad transformation temperature hysteresis, so it is suitable for pipe coupling [9,10,11]. NiTiFe SMA is typically used for coupling pipe since it possesses a lower martensite transformation start temperature [12,13,14]. NiTiPt, NiTiPd, NiTiZr, and NiTiHf SMAs become candidates for high temperature SMAs since they possess a higher reverse transformation temperature [15,16,17,18]. So far, quaternary NiTi-based SMAs have deserved more attention. Some quaternary SMAs have also become potential candidates for high temperature SMAs, such as TiNiPdCu [19], NiTiHfCu [20], NiTiHfZr [21], and NiTiHfTa [22] SMAs. In addition, some new quaternary NiTi-based SMAs, which possess special properties, have been put forward as well. These new quaternary NiTi-based SMAs include NiTiHfPd SMA with high strength [23,24], TiNiCuPd SMA with near-zero hysteresis [25], and NiTiCuV SMA with high thermal stabilization [26]. However, only a few studies have reported the investigations of quaternary NiTi-based SMAs.
In the present study, Nb and Ta elements were added to NiTiFe SMA in order to prepare NiTiFeNb and NiTiFeTa SMAs. Furthermore, the microstructure, mechanical property, and phase transformation of NiTiFeNb and NiTiFeTa SMAs were investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

On the basis of ternary Ni45Ti51.8Fe3.2 (at %) SMA, Nb and Ta elements were added by replacing the Ni element, and consequently quaternary Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1 and Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1 (at %) SMAs were fabricated via the vacuum arc melting method. Then, three as-cast NiTi-based SMAs were heated to 1000 °C and maintained for 12 h. Subsequently, the three heat-treated NiTi-based SMA samples were quenched with ice water. NiTi-based SMA samples, whose height and diameter were 6 mm and 4 mm, respectively, were removed from the heat-treated NiTi-based SMA ingots using electro-discharge machining (EDM) for the purpose of compression tests. The compression tests were performed with INSTRON-5500R equipment (Instron Corporation, Norwood, MA, USA) at room temperature, where the compression strain rate was determined as 0.001 s−1.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to determine the phase transformation temperatures of the three heat-treated NiTi-based SMA specimens by using a Pyris Diamond type differential scanning calorimeter (Perkin Elmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Therein, DSC measurement temperature ranged from −150 °C to 150 °C, and the heating and cooling rates were determined as 10 °C/min.
Optical microscopy (OM) as well as transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was employed to characterize the microstructures of the three heat-treated NiTi-based SMA samples. The samples for the OM experiment were etched in a solution whose composition was determined as HF:HNO3:H2O = 1:2:10. Then, the OM experiment was performed using an OLYMPUS311 type optical microscope (Olympus Corporation Tokyo, Japan). The TEM experiment was carried out on an FEI TECNAI G2 F30 microscope (FEI Corporation, Hillsboro, OR, USA) with a side-entry and double-tilt specimen stage with an angular range of ± 40° at an accelerating voltage of 300 kV. Foils for TEM observation were mechanically ground to 70 μm and then thinned by twin-jet polishing in an electrolyte containing 90% C2H5OH and 10% HClO4 by volume fraction.
Employing a Philips X’Pert Pro diffractometer (Royal Dutch Philips Electronics Ltd. Amsterdam, Netherlands) with CuKα radiation at ambient temperature, X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was used to identify the phase composition of the three heat-treated NiTi-based SMA samples. The samples were scanned over 2θ, which ranges from 20° to 90° by continuous scanning based on a tube voltage of 40 kV and a tube current of 40 mA.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microstructure Analysis of NiTi-based SMAs

Figure 1 shows the microstructures of Ni45Ti51.8Fe3.2, Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1, and Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1 SMAs determined by OM. The microstructures of the three NiTi-based SMAs are dominated by equiaxed grains rather than dendrites. In addition, there are some precipitates in the grain interior as well as at the grain boundary.
To further determine the phase composition of the three NiTi-based SMAs, XRD maps of Ni45Ti51.8Fe3.2, Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1, and Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1 SMAs are illustrated in Figure 2. It is evident that the three NiTi-based SMAs are composed of B2 austenite and Ti2Ni precipitate.
In order to gain an in-depth insight into the microstructures of the three NiTi-based SMAs, TEM micrographs of Ni45Ti51.8Fe3.2, Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1, and Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1 SMAs are shown in Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively. It can be observed from Figure 3 that Ni45Ti51.8Fe3.2 SMA consists of B2 austenite matrix and Ti2Ni precipitate. It can be seen in Figure 4 that in terms of Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1 SMA, Ti2Ni and β-Nb precipitates occur in the matrix of B2 austenite. It can be seen in Figure 5 that the matrix of Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1 SMA belongs to B2 austenite, where both Ti2Ni and Ni3Ti precipitates can be observed.

3.2. Mechanical Property of NiTi-based SMAs

Figure 6 illustrates the stress-strain curves of Ni45Ti51.8Fe3.2, Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1, and Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1 SMAs under uniaxial compression. It is observed that the addition of Nb and Ta elements results in the increasing yield strength of NiTi-based SMAs, but also leads to the decreasing plasticity of NiTi-based SMAs. Furthermore, Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1 SMA possesses a higher yield strength than Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1 SMA. In other words, the Nb element plays a more substantial role in strengthening NiTi-based SMAs compared with the Ta element. According to the aforementioned microstructural analysis, no metallic compounds of Nb and Ta elements are observed in the case of Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1 and Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1 SMAs. Consequently, it can be concluded that Nb and Ta exist in the solid solution of B2 austenite as the solute atoms. In particular, compared to Ni45Ti51.8Fe3.2 and Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1 SMAs, Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1 SMA exhibits a steady strain hardening ability during plastic deformation. It is well known that the strain hardening ability of metal materials is related closely to the dislocation density. In general, the strain hardening ability increases with increasing dislocation denstiy. Therefore, as for Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1 SMA, plenty of dislocations need to be enhanced so as to guarantee the compatiblity of plastic deformation.

3.3. Phase Transformation of NiTi-based SMAs

Figure 7 shows the DSC curves of Ni45Ti51.8Fe3.2, Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1, and Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1 SMAs. All three NiTi-based SMAs exhibit a one-step phase transformation during cooling. The one-step phase transformation deals with the transformation from B2 austenite (A) to B19’ martensite (M). However, all three NiTi-based SMAs exhibit a two-step phase transformation during heating. First, they are converted from B19’ martensite to an R-phase. Subsequently, they are transformed from the R-phase into B2 austenite. It can be noted that the addition of Nb and Ta elements does not change the phase transformation path of NiTiFe SMA, but it does have a certain effect on the transformation temperatures of NiTiFe SMA. As a consequence, all of the transformation temperatures are diminished. In particular, as for Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1 SMA, the addition of the Nb element results in the severe diminishment of the martensite and austenite transformation temperatures.
Compared to Ni45Ti51.8Fe3.2 SMA, Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1 and Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1 SMAs possess a lower phase transformation temperature. In particular, in the case of Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1 SMA, the addition of the Nb element influences the phase transformation temperature considerably, and consequently all the phase transformation temperatures are lowered substantially compared with Ni45Ti51.8Fe3.2 SMA. In general, for the purpose of lowering the martensite transformation start temperature Ms, the transformation resistance should be enhanced when B2 austenite is transformed into B19’ martensite. Simultaneously, in order to enhance the austenite transformation start temperature As, the mechanical driving force should be diminished when B19’ martensite is transformed into B2 austenite.
It can be deduced that the addition of Nb and Ta elements contributes to the increase of the elastic strain energy of B2 austenite. Consequently, the elastic strain energy becomes the resistance, which prevents B2 austenite from being transformed into B19’ martensite, so that the martensite phase transformation temperature is lowered. Conversely, the elastic strain energy kept in the martensite interface becomes the mechanical driving force, which facilitates the transformation from B19’ martensite to B2 austenite, so that the austenite phase transformation temperature is enhanced.

4. Conclusions

Based on ternary Ni45Ti51.8Fe3.2 (at %) SMA, two new quaternary Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1 and Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1 (at %) SMAs were designed and fabricated by adding Nb and Ta elements to replace the Ni element. Furthermore, the microstructure, mechanical property, and phase transformation of NiTiFeNb and NiTiFeTa SMAs were investigated. The following conclusions are drawn:
(1)
The microstructures of three NiTi-based SMAs are dominated by equiaxed grains rather than dendrites. Ni45Ti51.8Fe3.2 SMA comprises a B2 austenite matrix and a Ti2Ni precipitate. In the case of Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1 SMA, Ti2Ni and β-Nb precipitates occur in the matrix of B2 austenite. The matrix of Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1 SMA belongs to B2 austenite, where Ti2Ni and Ni3Ti precipitates can be observed.
(2)
The addition of Nb and Ta elements results in the increasing yield strength of NiTi-based SMA, but leads to the decreasing plasticity of NiTi-based SMA. Furthermore, Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1 SMA possesses a higher yield strength than Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1 SMA, where the Nb element plays a more substantial role in strengthening NiTi-based SMAs compared with the Ta element. Nb and Ta exist in the solid solution of B2 austenite as the solute atoms, since no metallic compounds of Nb and Ta elements are observed in the case of Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1. In particular, Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1 SMA exhibits a steady strain hardening ability during plastic deformation.
(3)
All three NiTi-based SMAs exhibit a one-step phase transformation during cooling, which is involved in the transformation from B2 austenite to B19’ martensite. However, all three NiTi-based SMAs exhibit a two-step phase transformation during heating, where they are converted from B19’ martensite to the R-phase and subsequently they are transformed from the R-phase into the B2 phase. The addition of Nb and Ta elements does not change the phase transformation path of NiTiFe SMA, but it does have a certain effect on the transformation temperatures of NiTiFe SMA. As a consequence, all the transformation temperatures are diminished.

Acknowledgments

The work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51475101, 51305091 and 51305092).

Author Contributions

Yulong Liang wrote the manuscript; Shuyong Jiang supervised the manuscript; Yanqiu Zhang performed the OM and TEM analysis; Junbo Yu performed the DSC analysis and compression test.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Elahinia, M.H.; Hashemi, M.; Tabesh, M.; Bhaduri, S.B. Manufacturing and processing of NiTi implants: A review. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2012, 57, 911–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sun, L.; Huang, W.M.; Ding, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, C.C.; Purnawali, H.; Tang, C. Stimulus-responsive shape memory materials: A review. Mater. Des. 2012, 33, 577–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Meng, Q.; Yang, H.; Liu, Y.; Nam, T.H. Transformation intervals and elastic strain energies of B2-B19’ martensitic transformation of NiTi. Intermetallics 2010, 18, 2431–2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Otsuka, K.; Ren, X. Physical metallurgy of Ti–Ni-based shape memory alloys. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2005, 50, 511–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mohd Jani, J.; Leary, M.; Subic, A.; Gibson, M.A. A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities. Mater. Des. 2014, 56, 1078–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Etaati, A.; Dehghani, K. A study on hot deformation behavior of Ni–42.5Ti–7.5Cu alloy. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2013, 140, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Nespoli, A.; Villa, E.; Besseghini, S. Characterization of the martensitic transformation in Ni50−xTi50Cux alloys through pure thermal measurements. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 644–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Goryczka, T.; Ochin, P. Microstructure, texture and shape memory effect in Ni25Ti50Cu5 ribbons and strips. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2006, 438–440, 714–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. He, X.M.; Rong, L.J.; Yan, D.S.; Li, Y.Y. TiNiNb wide hysteresis shape memory alloy with low niobium content. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2004, 371, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, X.; Yan, X.; Yang, Y.; Xu, H. Wide hysteresis NiTi (Nb) shape memory alloys with low Nb content (4.5 at %). Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2006, 438, 575–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shu, X.Y.; Lu, S.Q.; Li, G.F.; Liu, J.W.; Peng, P. Nb solution influencing on phase transformation temperature of Ni47Ti44Nb9 alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 609, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xue, S.; Wang, W.; Wu, D.; Zhai, Q.; Zheng, H. On the explanation for the time-dependence of B2 to R martensitic transformation in Ti50Ni47Fe3 shape memory alloy. Mater. Lett. 2012, 72, 119–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Basu, R.; Eskandari, M.; Upadhayay, L.; Mohtadi-Bonab, M.A.; Szpunar, J.A. A systematic investigation on the role of microstructure on phase transformation behavior in Ni–Ti–Fe shape memory alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 645, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Matsuda, M.; Yamashita, R.; Tsurekawa, S.; Takashima, K.; Mitsuhara, M.; Nishida, M. Antiphase boundary-like structure of B19’ martensite via R-phase transformation in Ti–Ni–Fe alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 586, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kovarik, L.; Yang, F.; Garg, A.; Diercks, D.; Kaufman, M.; Noebe, R.D.; Mills, M.J. Structural analysis of a new precipitate phase in high-temperature TiNiPt shape memory alloys. Acta Mater. 2010, 58, 4660–4673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Atli, K.C.; Karaman, I.; Noebe, R.D.; Maier, H.J. Comparative analysis of the effects of severe plastic deformation and thermomechanical training on the functional stability of Ti50.5Ni24.5Pd25 high-temperature shape memory alloy. Scr. Mater. 2011, 64, 315–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Santamarta, R.; Arróyave, R.; Pons, J.; Evirgen, A.; Karaman, I.; Karaca, H.E.; Noebe, R.D. TEM study of structural and microstructural characteristics of a precipitate phase in Ni-rich Ni–Ti–Hf and Ni–Ti–Zr shape memory alloys. Acta Mater. 2013, 61, 6191–6206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kockar, B.; Karaman, I.; Kim, J.I.; Chumlyakov, Y. A method to enhance cyclic reversibility of NiTiHf high temperature shape memory alloys. Scr. Mater. 2006, 54, 2203–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rehman, S.U.; Khan, M.; Nusair Khan, A.; Ali, L.; Zaman, S.; Waseem, M.; Ali, L.; Jaffery, S.H.I. Transformation behavior and shape memory properties of Ti50Ni15Pd25Cu10 high temperature shape memory alloy at various aging temperatures. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2014, 619, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Karaca, H.E.; Acar, E.; Ded, G.S.; Saghaian, S.M.; Basaran, B.; Tobe, H.; Kok, M.; Maier, H.J.; Noebe, R.D.; Chumlyakov, Y.I. Microstructure and transformation related behaviors of a Ni45.3Ti29.7Hf20Cu5 high temperature shape memory alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2015, 627, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hong, S.H.; Kim, J.T.; Park, H.J.; Kim, Y.S.; Suh, J.Y.; Na, Y.S.; Lim, K.R.; Shim, C.H.; Park, J.M.; Kim, K.B. Influence of Zr content on phase formation, transition and mechanical behavior of Ni–Ti–Hf–Zr high temperature shape memory alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 692, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Prasad, R.V.S.; Park, C.H.; Kim, S.W.; Hong, J.K.; Yeom, J.T. Microstructure and phase transformation behavior of a new high temperature NiTiHf-Ta shape memory alloy with excellent formability. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 697, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Acar, E.; Karaca, H.E.; Tobe, H.; Noebe, R.D.; Chumlyakov, Y.I. Characterization of the shape memory properties of a Ni45.3Ti39.7Hf10Pd5 alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 578, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Karaca, H.E.; Acar, E.; Ded, G.S.; Basaran, B.; Tobe, H.; Noebe, R.D.; Bigelow, G.; Chumlyakov, Y.I. Shape memory behavior of high strength NiTiHfPd polycrystalline alloys. Acta Mater. 2013, 61, 5036–5049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Meng, X.L.; Li, H.; Cai, W.; Hao, S.J.; Cui, L.S. Thermal cycling stability mechanism of Ti50.5Ni33.5Cu11.5Pd4.5 shape memory alloy with near-zero hysteresis. Scr. Mater. 2015, 103, 30–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Schmidt, M.; Ullrich, J.; Wieczorek, A.; Frenzel, J.; Schütze, A.; Eggeler, G.; Seelecke, S. Thermal stabilization of NiTiCuV shape memory alloys: Observations during elastocaloric training. Shape Mem. Superelast. 2015, 1, 132–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. OM (Optical microscopy) micrographs of the three NiTi-based SMAs: (a) Ni45Ti51.8Fe3.2; (b) Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1; (c) Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1.
Figure 1. OM (Optical microscopy) micrographs of the three NiTi-based SMAs: (a) Ni45Ti51.8Fe3.2; (b) Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1; (c) Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1.
Metals 07 00309 g001
Figure 2. XRD (X-ray diffraction) maps of the three NiTi-based SMAs: (a) Ni45Ti51.8Fe3.2; (b) Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1; (c) Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1.
Figure 2. XRD (X-ray diffraction) maps of the three NiTi-based SMAs: (a) Ni45Ti51.8Fe3.2; (b) Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1; (c) Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1.
Metals 07 00309 g002
Figure 3. TEM (Transmission electron microscopy) micrographs of Ni45Ti51.8Fe3.2 SMA (Shape memory alloy): (a) Bright field image showing B2 austenite matrix; (b) Diffraction pattern of B2 austenite matrix in (a); (c) Bright field image showing Ti2Ni precipitate; (d) Diffraction pattern of Ti2Ni precipitate in (c).
Figure 3. TEM (Transmission electron microscopy) micrographs of Ni45Ti51.8Fe3.2 SMA (Shape memory alloy): (a) Bright field image showing B2 austenite matrix; (b) Diffraction pattern of B2 austenite matrix in (a); (c) Bright field image showing Ti2Ni precipitate; (d) Diffraction pattern of Ti2Ni precipitate in (c).
Metals 07 00309 g003
Figure 4. TEM micrographs of Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1 SMA: (a) Bright field image showing B2 austenite matrix; (b) Diffraction pattern of B2 austenite matrix in (a); (c) Bright field image showing Ti2Ni precipitate; (d) Diffraction pattern of Ti2Ni precipitate in (c); (e) Bright field image showing β-Nb precipitate; (f) Diffraction pattern of β-Nb precipitate in (e).
Figure 4. TEM micrographs of Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1 SMA: (a) Bright field image showing B2 austenite matrix; (b) Diffraction pattern of B2 austenite matrix in (a); (c) Bright field image showing Ti2Ni precipitate; (d) Diffraction pattern of Ti2Ni precipitate in (c); (e) Bright field image showing β-Nb precipitate; (f) Diffraction pattern of β-Nb precipitate in (e).
Metals 07 00309 g004
Figure 5. TEM micrographs of Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1 SMA: (a) Bright field image showing B2 austenite matrix; (b) Diffraction pattern of B2 austenite matrix in (a); (c) Bright field image showing Ti2Ni precipitate; (d) Diffraction pattern of Ti2Ni precipitate in (c); (e) Bright field image showing Ni3Ti precipitate; (f) Diffraction pattern of Ni3Ti precipitate in (e).
Figure 5. TEM micrographs of Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1 SMA: (a) Bright field image showing B2 austenite matrix; (b) Diffraction pattern of B2 austenite matrix in (a); (c) Bright field image showing Ti2Ni precipitate; (d) Diffraction pattern of Ti2Ni precipitate in (c); (e) Bright field image showing Ni3Ti precipitate; (f) Diffraction pattern of Ni3Ti precipitate in (e).
Metals 07 00309 g005
Figure 6. Compressive stress-strain curves of the three NiTi-based SMAs.
Figure 6. Compressive stress-strain curves of the three NiTi-based SMAs.
Metals 07 00309 g006
Figure 7. DSC (Differential scanning calorimetry) curves of the three NiTi-based SMAs: (a) Ni45Ti51.8Fe3.2; (b) Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1; (c) Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1.
Figure 7. DSC (Differential scanning calorimetry) curves of the three NiTi-based SMAs: (a) Ni45Ti51.8Fe3.2; (b) Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Nb1; (c) Ni44Ti51.8Fe3.2Ta1.
Metals 07 00309 g007

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, Y.; Jiang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, J. Microstructure, Mechanical Property, and Phase Transformation of Quaternary NiTiFeNb and NiTiFeTa Shape Memory Alloys. Metals 2017, 7, 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/met7080309

AMA Style

Liang Y, Jiang S, Zhang Y, Yu J. Microstructure, Mechanical Property, and Phase Transformation of Quaternary NiTiFeNb and NiTiFeTa Shape Memory Alloys. Metals. 2017; 7(8):309. https://doi.org/10.3390/met7080309

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Yulong, Shuyong Jiang, Yanqiu Zhang, and Junbo Yu. 2017. "Microstructure, Mechanical Property, and Phase Transformation of Quaternary NiTiFeNb and NiTiFeTa Shape Memory Alloys" Metals 7, no. 8: 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/met7080309

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop