Amerindian Cosmologies and European Prehistoric Cave Art: Reasons for and Usefulness of a Comparison
AbstractSeveral anthropological studies conducted in recent years among different Native American cultures have revealed a series of common features in ontological premises and cosmological frameworks. These features seem to be shared by most of the Native peoples in both North and South America. They include: a system of relationships between humans and non-human beings based on an ontology “of persons” as contrasted to the ontology “of things” typical of the Western attitude towards Nature; a structure of the cosmos made by superposed layers, which express the idea of a reality represented as comprising hidden dimensions and invisible domains; and the key role played by ecstatic practitioners in establishing relationships with and acquiring knowledge from these multiple dimensions of the universe. Here, the idea is suggested that these elements could be profitably utilized to interpret the meaning of Paleolithic cave art, not simply implying a series of typological likenesses, but suggesting the possibility of historic (pre-historic) links. It should be remembered that the main settlement of the Americas occurred in a period (from 30,000–20,000 years B.P.) which is contemporaneous with the creation of the masterworks in the caves of France and Spain. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Comba, E. Amerindian Cosmologies and European Prehistoric Cave Art: Reasons for and Usefulness of a Comparison. Arts 2014, 3, 1-14.
Comba E. Amerindian Cosmologies and European Prehistoric Cave Art: Reasons for and Usefulness of a Comparison. Arts. 2014; 3(1):1-14.Chicago/Turabian Style
Comba, Enrico. 2014. "Amerindian Cosmologies and European Prehistoric Cave Art: Reasons for and Usefulness of a Comparison." Arts 3, no. 1: 1-14.