Next Article in Journal
Bioactive Compounds Produced by Hypoxylon fragiforme against Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms
Next Article in Special Issue
Biomarkers’ Responses to Reductive Dechlorination Rates and Oxygen Stress in Bioaugmentation Culture KB-1TM
Previous Article in Journal
The Small Regulatory RNA Spot42 Inhibits Indole Biosynthesis to Negatively Regulate the Locus of Enterocyte Effacement of Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biotechnological Applications of Microbial (Per)chlorate Reduction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Relationship among Phosphorus Circulation Activity, Bacterial Biomass, pH, and Mineral Concentration in Agricultural Soil

Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Life Science, Ritsumeikan University, Nojihigashi 1-1-1, Kusatsu, Shiga 525-8577, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2017, 5(4), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5040079
Submission received: 4 October 2017 / Revised: 20 November 2017 / Accepted: 1 December 2017 / Published: 4 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microorganisms for Environmental and Industrial Applications)

Abstract

:
Improvement of phosphorus circulation in the soil is necessary to enhance phosphorus availability to plants. Phosphorus circulation activity is an index of soil’s ability to supply soluble phosphorus from organic phosphorus in the soil solution. To understand the relationship among phosphorus circulation activity; bacterial biomass; pH; and Fe, Al, and Ca concentrations (described as mineral concentration in this paper) in agricultural soil, 232 soil samples from various agricultural fields were collected and analyzed. A weak relationship between phosphorus circulation activity and bacterial biomass was observed in all soil samples (R2 = 0.25), and this relationship became significantly stronger at near-neutral pH (6.0–7.3; R2 = 0.67). No relationship between phosphorus circulation activity and bacterial biomass was observed at acidic (pH < 6.0) or alkaline (pH > 7.3) pH. A negative correlation between Fe and Al concentrations and phosphorus circulation activity was observed at acidic pH (R2 = 0.72 and 0.73, respectively), as well as for Ca at alkaline pH (R2 = 0.64). Therefore, bacterial biomass, pH, and mineral concentration should be considered together for activation of phosphorus circulation activity in the soil. A relationship model was proposed based on the effects of bacterial biomass and mineral concentration on phosphorus circulation activity. The suitable conditions of bacterial biomass, pH, and mineral concentration for phosphorus circulation activity could be estimated from the relationship model.

1. Introduction

Phosphorus is an important nutrient element for plants that exists in various organic and inorganic forms, and phytate is a major form of organic phosphorus in soil [1,2]. The inorganic forms include soluble phosphates (such as H2PO4 and HPO42−) and insoluble compounds (such as Fe3(PO4)2, AlPO4, and Ca3(PO4)2). Soluble phosphates are available to plants, but their availability is regulated by several factors including microorganisms; sorption intensity over soil minerals; and precipitation with Ca, Fe, and Al in the soil.
Soil microorganisms mineralize organic phosphorus (such as phytate) into inorganic phosphates [3,4,5]. However, high concentrations of Fe, Al, and Ca (described as ‘mineral concentration’ in this paper) could limit the availability of phosphorus, even at high level microbial biomass. Soluble phosphates precipitate as Fe-, Al-, and Ca-phosphates in the soil at specific pH [6]. Phosphorus adsorption varies with the solubility of Fe, Al, or Ca at acidic or alkaline pH [7,8].
Understanding the phosphorus circulation process in soil is important as most of the agricultural soils contain a little amount of available phosphorus [9]. Phosphorus availability has generally been considered to be controlled by physical and chemical processes such as sorption–desorption and pH driven precipitation-dissolution. However, biological processes such as mineralization of organic phosphorus can also have a considerable role on phosphorus availability [10,11]. The role of such biological processes is more important where plant available phosphorus is generally low and the fraction of organic phosphorus is higher than the inorganic forms [12,13].
Improvement of phosphorus circulation in the soil is necessary to enhance phosphorus availability to plants. Although the effects of microorganisms, pH, and minerals (such as Fe, Al, and Ca) on phosphorus availability have been independently investigated [3,4,5,6,7,8], the total effects of these factors on phosphorus circulation activity in the soil are still unclear. In this study, the relationship among phosphorus circulation activity, bacterial biomass, pH, and mineral concentration (Fe, Al, and Ca) were analyzed. In addition, a relationship model was constructed based on the results.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Soil Sampling and Preparation

The soil samples used in this study were collected from 232 agricultural fields in Japan, Afghanistan, and France. Samples of Japan and Afghanistan belong to various upland annual crop fields. The samples from France correspond to the orchard fields. The general climates of Japan, France, and Afghanistan are temperate, temperate, and sub-tropical, respectively. The samples were taken from a depth of about 15 cm after removing the surface crust or litter layer and sieved through 2 mm mesh size stainless steel screens before analysis. The soil samples were transported to the laboratory located in Ritsumeikan University, Shiga, Kusatsu, Japan, soon after sampling without drying and kept cool at 4 °C until the analysis. The samples from Japan were transported to the laboratory within one week and those from France and Afghanistan were transported within four weeks after sampling.

2.2. Determination of Soil pH and Metal Concentration (Fe, Al, and Ca)

Soil pH (1:2.5 soil-to-water suspension, w/v) was analyzed using a pH meter (LAQUA F-72, Horiba, Kyoto, Japan). The diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) method was used to extract the Fe concentration from soil [14]. Similarly, Ca was extracted by the ammonium acetate method [15], while Fe and Ca concentrations in the extracts were measured using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Hitachi Z2300, Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Finally, the Al concentration in soil was estimated using a titrimetric method after extracting the soil sample with KCl [16]. The forms of Fe, Ca, and Al were named “available Fe”, “exchangeable Al”, and “exchangeable Ca” according to the previous reports [15,17,18].

2.3. Analysis of Bacterial Biomass and Phosphorus Circulation Activity

Soil bacterial biomass was analyzed by the slow-stirring method [19]. The phosphorus circulation activity was evaluated as previously described [20]. The phosphorus circulation activity indicates the rate of increase in soluble phosphorus in soil after addition of an organic phosphorus substrate (phytic acid). The method of determining phosphorus circulation activity is summarized as follows:
  • One gram soil was placed in four centrifuge tubes.
  • A measure of 150 μL of phytic acid solution (containing 3.3 mg organic phosphorus) was added in two tubes (Tube P), and 150 μL of distilled water was added in the remaining two tubes (Tube W).
  • In each of the phytic acid added tubes (Tube P0) and distilled water-added tubes (Tube W0), the water extractable phosphorus was analyzed immediately after the addition of water or phytic acid solution by molybdenum blue method [21].
  • The remaining phytic acid added and distilled water added tubes (Tubes P3 and W3, respectively) were incubated at 25 °C for three days and analyzed for the water-extractable phosphorus.
  • The phosphorus circulation activity was calculated by using the following formula:
    P h o s p h o r u s   c i r c u l a t i o n   a c t i v i t y   ( p o i n t ) = ( Soluble   P   in   Tube   P 3 Soluble   P   in   Tube   P 0 ) ( Soluble   P   in   Tube   W 3 Soluble   P   in   Tube   W 0 ) Added   P   in   Tube   P × 100
A schematic diagram showing the phosphorus circulation activity used in this study is shown in Figure 1. The phosphorus circulation activity is increased with mineralization and solubilization activities and decreased with adsorption. This method considers the solubilization factor constant in both phytate-added and water-added samples. The phosphorus circulation activity was expressed by assigning 0 points for no mineralization or complete adsorption to 100 points for complete mineralization but no adsorption.
To define the categories of bacterial biomass level for high, medium, and low level of phosphorus circulation activities, a reference from our previous study was taken [22]. In that study, more than 75% of the soil samples showing high (66.6–100.0 points) or low (<33.3 points) levels of phosphorus circulation activity had higher (≥6.0 × 108 cells/g) or lower (<4.3 × 108 cells/g) bacterial biomass (data not shown). Therefore, three categories of bacterial biomass level were defined as follows: high (≥6.0 × 108 cells/g), medium (4.3 × 108–5.9 × 108 cells/g), and low (<4.3 × 108 cells/g), respectively.

2.4. Determination of Total Carbon (TC), Total Nitrogen (TN), and Total Phosphorus (TP)

Total carbon in soil was estimated using a Total Organic Carbon Analyzer (TOC-VCPH, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and solid sample combustion unit (SSM-5000A, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total nitrogen and TP in soil samples were extracted by Kjeldahl digestion [23]. Total nitrogen in the extract was determined by the indophenol blue method [24] and total phosphorus by the molybdenum blue method [21].

2.5. Preparation of Soil Samples with Identical Physico-Chemical Properties but Different Bacterial Biomasses

To examine the effect of bacterial biomass on phosphorus circulation activity in the same soil condition, five soil samples with identical physico-chemical properties but different bacterial biomasses were prepared. For this purpose, a soil (pH 6.6) was autoclaved two times and mixed with the same non-autoclaved soil at different ratios.

3. Results

3.1. Relationship between Phosphorus Circulation Activity and Bacterial Biomass

To understand the effects of bacterial biomass on phosphorus circulation activity in the soil, the relationship between the phosphorus circulation activity and bacterial biomass was analyzed. Correlation analysis of 232 various agricultural soils showed a weakly positive relationship (R2 = 0.25) (Figure 2A). When the same soil condition with different bacterial biomass was used to analyze the relationship, a significantly strong curvilinear relationship was observed (R2 = 0.94) (Figure 2B). These results suggest that not only bacterial biomass, but also other soil properties—such as pH and mineral concentration—appear to affect phosphorus circulation activity in the soil. Furthermore, the effect of bacterial biomass seems to be curvilinear.
The role of bacteria for improving phosphorus mineralization activity has been reported [25,26,27,28]. Therefore, making the soil condition suitable for bacterial growth seems to be necessary for improving phosphorus availability.

3.2. Effects of Soil pH and Bacterial Biomass on Phosphorus Circulation Activity

The relationships between phosphorus circulation activity and bacterial biomass under acidic (pH < 6.0), near-neutral (pH 6.0–7.3), and alkaline (pH > 7.3) soil conditions were analyzed (Figure 3A–C). A significant positive relationship at near-neutral pH range was observed (R2 = 0.67) (Figure 3B). However, no relationship was observed at acidic or alkaline pH (Figure 3A,C). The weak relationship suggests that adsorption of phosphate ions with mineral concentration (such as Fe, Al, and Ca) in the soil affects the phosphorus circulation activity [6,7,8].

3.3. Effects of Mineral Concentration and pH on Phosphorus Circulation Activity

To understand the relationship between phosphorus circulation activity and mineral concentration, the effects of mineral concentration (Fe, Al, and Ca) on phosphorus circulation activity at abundant bacterial biomass (≥4.3 × 108 cells/g) were investigated (Figure 4A–F). No relationship between the phosphorus circulation activity and mineral concentration was observed at near-neutral pH (R2 ≤ 0.02) (Figure 4D–F). However, significant negative effects of Fe and Al concentrations at acidic pH (R2 values 0.72 and 0.73; Figure 4G,H, respectively) and of Ca concentration at alkaline pH (R2 value 0.64; Figure 4I) were observed. The results indicate that the effects of mineral concentration at near-neutral pH on phosphorus circulation activity were considerably low.
Fe, Al, and Ca are well known minerals that adsorb soluble phosphorus at specific pH [29,30]. No relationship at near-neutral pH suggests that adsorption of phosphate ions with minerals inhibited the phosphorus circulation activity in the soil at acidic or alkaline pH [31,32]. Therefore, factors such as bacterial biomass, pH, and mineral concentration should be considered altogether when evaluating activation of phosphorus circulation activity in the soil.

3.4. Suitable Soil Condition for High Phosphorus Circulation Activity

To show the relationship among phosphorus circulation activity, bacterial biomass, pH, and mineral concentration in soil, bacterial biomass, pH, and mineral concentrations were analyzed at different levels of phosphorus circulation activity (Table 1). Samples belonging to the low phosphorus circulation activity group (<5.0 points) had low bacterial biomass with either alkaline or acidic pH range. The results indicate that high bacterial biomass and low mineral concentrations lead to the enhancement of phosphorus circulation activity in soil.
Seven soils showing higher values of phosphorus circulation activity (>30 points) were selected to identify suitable soil conditions for high phosphorus circulation activity. High levels of TC, TN, and TP were observed in each soil and the average values of TC, TN, and TP were 34,300 mg/kg, 1420 mg/kg, and 3790 mg/kg, respectively (Table 2). The bacterial biomass also showed high levels (average value = 12.0 × 108 cells/g), and all samples belonged to the near-neutral pH range. These results indicate that higher and balanced carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in soil seemed to be suitable for microbial growth and phosphorus circulation activities.

3.5. Relationship among Phosphorus Circulation Activity, Mineral Concentration, pH, and Bacterial Biomass

A model was constructed based on the positive effects of bacterial biomass and negative effects of mineral concentration (Fe, Al, and Ca) on the phosphorus circulation activity (Figure 5). The models for Fe and Al at acidic pH range and Ca at alkaline pH range were constructed separately. As shown in Figure 5, the phosphorus circulation activity, bacterial biomass, and mineral concentration were related to each other at acidic and alkaline pH. The phosphorus circulation activity varied differently in high (≥6.0 × 108 cells/g), medium (4.3 × 108–5.9 × 108 cells/g), and low (<4.3 × 108 cells/g) levels of bacterial biomass. The phosphorus circulation activity was 0 point at all categories of bacterial biomass when concentrations of Fe, Al, and Ca were ≥1200 mg/kg, ≥600 mg/kg, and ≥9000 mg/kg, respectively. Similarly, when concentrations of each mineral were low, the phosphorus circulation activity value was the highest, and the value corresponded to the bacterial biomass level. From this model, mineral concentrations can be estimated by using the values of bacterial biomass and phosphorus circulation activity. In addition, the suitable conditions of bacterial biomass, pH, and mineral concentration in soil can be estimated from this model.
Limited phosphorus availability is always a big challenge for improving agricultural productivity. Under acidic and alkaline soils, the challenge is more severe. It is reported that about 30% of the world’s ice-free land is acidic [33]. Similarly, alkaline soils occupy almost the same proportion of the world’s arable soil. Understanding the relationship among bacterial biomass, mineral concentration, pH, and phosphorus circulation activity could be a useful tool for improving phosphorus use efficiency, especially under organic farming systems.

4. Conclusions

The relationship between phosphorus circulation activity and bacterial biomass was significantly positive, especially at near-neutral pH in the soil, whereas the relationship between phosphorus circulation activity and concentrations of Fe, Al, and Ca was negative at acidic or alkaline pH. The relationship model of the phosphorus circulation activity, bacterial biomass, pH, and mineral concentration can be used for estimating Fe, Al, and Ca concentrations in soil using the values of phosphorus circulation activity and bacterial biomass.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support from the core-to-core program (CCP Program) of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).

Author Contributions

D.A., K.S.A., and M.K. designed the study plan; T.J., T.Kaw, T.Kai, and K.K. performed the experiments and analyzed data; D.A. wrote the manuscript with assistance from all authors; M.K. supervised the research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Turner, B.L.; Papházy, M.J.; Haygarth, P.M.; McKelvie, I.D. Inositol phosphates in the environment. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2002, 357, 449–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Richardson, A.E.; George, T.S.; Hens, M.; Simpson, R.J. Utilization of soil organic phosphorus by higher plants. In Organic Phosphorus in the Environment; Turner, B.L., Frossard, E., Baldwin, D., Eds.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2005; pp. 165–184. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cosgrove, D.J.; Irving, G.C.J.; Bromfield, S.M. Inositol phosphate phosphatases of microbiological origin. The isolation of soil bacteria having inositol phosphate phosphatase activity. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1970, 23, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Richardson, A.E.; Hadobas, P.A. Soil isolates of Pseudomonas spp. that utilize inositol phosphates. Can. J. Microbiol. 1997, 43, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Richardson, A.E.; Hadobas, P.A.; Hayes, J.E.; O’hara, C.P.; Simpson, R.J. Utilization of phosphorus by pasture plants supplied with myo-inositol hexaphosphate is enhanced by the presence of soil micro-organisms. Plant Soil 2001, 229, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hemwall, J.B. The fixation of phosphorus by soils. Adv. Agron. 1957, 9, 95–112. [Google Scholar]
  7. Oberson, A.; Friesen, D.K.; Rao, I.M.; Bühler, S.; Frossard, E. Phosphorus transformations in an oxisol under constrasting land-use systems: The role of the microbial biomass. Plant Soil 2001, 237, 197–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Doolette, A.L.; Smernik, R.J.; Dougherty, W.J. Rapid decomposition of phytate applied to a calcareous soil demonstrated by a solution 31P NMR study. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2010, 61, 563–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Condron, L.M. Phosphorus–surplus and deficiency. In Managing Soil Quality: Challenges in Modern Agriculture; Schjonning, P., Elmholt, S., Christensen, B.T., Eds.; CAB International: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2004; pp. 69–84. [Google Scholar]
  10. Frossard, E.; Condron, L.M.; Oberson, A.; Sinaj, S.; Fardeau, J.C. Processes governing phosphorus availability in temperate soils. J. Environ. Qual. 2000, 29, 15–23. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bunemann, E.K. Assessment of gross and net mineralization rates of soil organic phosphorus—A review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015, 89, 82–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Entz, M.H.; Guliford, R.; Gulden, R. Crop yield and soil nutrient status on 14 organic forms in the eastern portion of the northern Great Plains. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2001, 81, 351–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gosling, P.; Shephard, M. Long-term changes in soil fertility in organic arable farming systems in England, with particular reference to phosphorus and potassium. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2005, 105, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lindsay, W.L.; Norvell, W.A. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1978, 42, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schollenberger, C.J.; Simon, R.H. Determination of exchange capacity and exchangeable bases in soil-ammonium acetate method. Soil Sci. 1945, 59, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mclean, E.O. Aluminum. In Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2. Chemical Methods; Black, C.A., Ed.; American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA, 1965; pp. 978–998. [Google Scholar]
  17. De Boer, G.J.; Reisenauer, H.M. DTPA as an extractant of available soil iron. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1973, 4, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, C.; Coleman, N.T. The measurement of exchangeable aluminum in soils and clays. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1960, 24, 444–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aoshima, H.; Kimura, A.; Shibutani, A.; Okada, C.; Matsumiya, Y.; Kubo, M. Evaluation of soil bacterial biomass using environmental DNA extracted by slow-stirring method. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 71, 875–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Horii, S.; Matsuno, T.; Tagomori, J.; Mukai, M.; Adhikari, D.; Kubo, M. Isolation and identification of phytate-degrading bacteria and their contribution to phytate mineralization in soil. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 59, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Holman, W.I.M. A new technique for the determination of phosphorus by the molybdenum blue method. Biochem. J. 1943, 37, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Araki, K.S.; Perwira, I.Y.; Adhikari, D.; Kubo, M. Comparison of soil properties between upland and paddy fields based on the soil fertility index (SOFIX). Curr. Trends Microbiol. 2016, 8, 81–91. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kjeldahl, J.G.C.T. Neue methode zur bestimmung des stickstoffs in organischen körpern. Fresenius. J. Anal. Chem. 1883, 22, 366–382. [Google Scholar]
  24. Scheiner, D. Determination of ammonia and Kjeldahl nitrogen by indophenol method. Water Res. 1976, 10, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gyaneshwar, P.; Kumar, G.N.; Parekh, L.J.; Poole, P.S. Role of soil microorganisms in improving P nutrition of plants. In Food Security in Nutrient-Stressed Environments: Exploiting Plants’ Genetic Capabilities; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2002; pp. 133–143. [Google Scholar]
  26. Richardson, A.E.; Simpson, R.J. Soil microorganisms mediating phosphorus availability update on microbial phosphorus. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 989–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jackman, R.H.; Black, C.A. Solubility of iron, aluminum, calcium, and magnesium inositol phosphates at different pH values. Soil Sci. 1951, 72, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Terman, G.L.; Bouldin, D.R.; Lehr, J.R. Calcium phosphate fertilizers: I. Availability to plants and solubility in soils varying in pH. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1958, 22, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Stewart, J.W.B.; Tiessen, H. Dynamics of soil organic phosphorus. Biogeochemistry 1987, 4, 41–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kucey, R.M.N.; Janzen, H.H.; Leggett, M.E. Microbially mediated increases in plant-available phosphorus. Adv. Agron. 1989, 42, 199–228. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hsu, O.H. Fixation of phosphate by aluminum and iron in acidic soils. Soil Sci. 1965, 99, 398–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hopkins, B.; Ellsworth, J. Phosphorus availability with alkaline/calcareous soil. In Proceedings of the Western Nutrient Management Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2005; Volume 6, pp. 88–93. [Google Scholar]
  33. Von Uexküll, H.R.; Mutert, E. Global extent, development and economic impact of acid soils. In Plant-Soil Interactions at Low pH: Principles and Management; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1995; pp. 5–19. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram showing the phosphorus circulation activity in soil.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram showing the phosphorus circulation activity in soil.
Microorganisms 05 00079 g001
Figure 2. Relationship between phosphorus circulation activity and bacterial biomass in: (A) various agricultural soils (n = 232) and (B) the same agricultural soil with different bacterial biomass. Soils in (B) were prepared by mixing autoclaved soil at different ratios. R2-value marked with two asterisks (**) indicates significant regression (p < 0.01).
Figure 2. Relationship between phosphorus circulation activity and bacterial biomass in: (A) various agricultural soils (n = 232) and (B) the same agricultural soil with different bacterial biomass. Soils in (B) were prepared by mixing autoclaved soil at different ratios. R2-value marked with two asterisks (**) indicates significant regression (p < 0.01).
Microorganisms 05 00079 g002
Figure 3. Relationship between phosphorus circulation activity and bacterial biomass in agricultural soil at different pH ranges. (A) Acid (pH < 6.0, n = 60); (B) near-neutral (pH 6.0–7.3, n = 94); (C) alkaline (pH > 7.3, n = 78). R2-value marked with two asterisks (**) indicates a significant regression (p < 0.01).
Figure 3. Relationship between phosphorus circulation activity and bacterial biomass in agricultural soil at different pH ranges. (A) Acid (pH < 6.0, n = 60); (B) near-neutral (pH 6.0–7.3, n = 94); (C) alkaline (pH > 7.3, n = 78). R2-value marked with two asterisks (**) indicates a significant regression (p < 0.01).
Microorganisms 05 00079 g003
Figure 4. Relationship between phosphorus circulation activity and mineral concentrations at abundant bacterial biomass. (A) Phosphorus circulation activity and available Fe at all pH values; (B) phosphorus circulation activity and exchangeable Al at all pH values; (C) phosphorus circulation activity and available Ca at all pH values; (D) phosphorus circulation activity and available Fe at near-neutral pH; (E) phosphorus circulation activity and exchangeable Al concentration at near-neutral pH; (F) phosphorus circulation activity and available Ca at near-neutral pH; (G) phosphorus circulation activity and available Fe at acid pH; (H) phosphorus circulation activity and exchangeable Al at acid pH; (I) phosphorus circulation activity and available Ca at alkaline pH. R2-value marked by two asterisks (**) indicates a significant regression (p < 0.01).
Figure 4. Relationship between phosphorus circulation activity and mineral concentrations at abundant bacterial biomass. (A) Phosphorus circulation activity and available Fe at all pH values; (B) phosphorus circulation activity and exchangeable Al at all pH values; (C) phosphorus circulation activity and available Ca at all pH values; (D) phosphorus circulation activity and available Fe at near-neutral pH; (E) phosphorus circulation activity and exchangeable Al concentration at near-neutral pH; (F) phosphorus circulation activity and available Ca at near-neutral pH; (G) phosphorus circulation activity and available Fe at acid pH; (H) phosphorus circulation activity and exchangeable Al at acid pH; (I) phosphorus circulation activity and available Ca at alkaline pH. R2-value marked by two asterisks (**) indicates a significant regression (p < 0.01).
Microorganisms 05 00079 g004
Figure 5. Model showing the relationship among phosphorus circulation activity, bacterial biomass, pH, and mineral concentration. (A) Available Fe or exchangeable Al at acidic pH range (<6.0) and (B) exchangeable Ca at alkaline pH range (>7.3). Examples of estimating concentrations of Fe, Al, and Ca using the model are also shown.
Figure 5. Model showing the relationship among phosphorus circulation activity, bacterial biomass, pH, and mineral concentration. (A) Available Fe or exchangeable Al at acidic pH range (<6.0) and (B) exchangeable Ca at alkaline pH range (>7.3). Examples of estimating concentrations of Fe, Al, and Ca using the model are also shown.
Microorganisms 05 00079 g005
Table 1. Frequency distribution of samples with different levels of phosphorus circulation activity.
Table 1. Frequency distribution of samples with different levels of phosphorus circulation activity.
Phosphorus Circulation Activity (pt.)Number of SampleBacterial biomass (×108 cells/g)pHAvailable Fe (mg/kg)Exchangeable Al (mg/kg)Exchangeable Ca (mg/kg)
<1.0893.47.51101104300
1.0–4.9542.75.43102801270
5.0–9.9393.56.32301102240
10.0–19.9235.86.92501102530
20.0–29.9207.08.1240802370
30.0–45.376.812.3160702390
Table 2. Properties of soils showing higher phosphorus circulation activity (>30 points).
Table 2. Properties of soils showing higher phosphorus circulation activity (>30 points).
SamplePhosphorus Circulation Activity (pt.)TC (mg/kg)TN (mg/kg)TP (mg/kg)Available Fe (mg/kg)Exchangeable Al (mg/kg)Exchangeable Ca (mg/kg)Bacterial Biomass (×108 Cells/g)pH
14542,600129030901001101610146.7
23845,5701850191090802330167.3
33736,90013901970110702310136.7
43534,27011303300250503330107.0
53229,20014002670190702000106.7
63123,00015201720210603500107.0
73127,55013501890210501690106.5
Average3334,30014202360160702390126.8

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Adhikari, D.; Jiang, T.; Kawagoe, T.; Kai, T.; Kubota, K.; Araki, K.S.; Kubo, M. Relationship among Phosphorus Circulation Activity, Bacterial Biomass, pH, and Mineral Concentration in Agricultural Soil. Microorganisms 2017, 5, 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5040079

AMA Style

Adhikari D, Jiang T, Kawagoe T, Kai T, Kubota K, Araki KS, Kubo M. Relationship among Phosphorus Circulation Activity, Bacterial Biomass, pH, and Mineral Concentration in Agricultural Soil. Microorganisms. 2017; 5(4):79. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5040079

Chicago/Turabian Style

Adhikari, Dinesh, Tianyi Jiang, Taiki Kawagoe, Takamitsu Kai, Kenzo Kubota, Kiwako S. Araki, and Motoki Kubo. 2017. "Relationship among Phosphorus Circulation Activity, Bacterial Biomass, pH, and Mineral Concentration in Agricultural Soil" Microorganisms 5, no. 4: 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5040079

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop