Next Article in Journal
Comparison of Flood Frequency Analysis Methods for Ungauged Catchments in France
Next Article in Special Issue
A Study of Ground Movements in Brussels (Belgium) Monitored by Persistent Scatterer Interferometry over a 25-Year Period
Previous Article in Journal
Are We There Yet? A Review and Assessment of Archaeological Passive Airborne Optical Imaging Approaches in the Light of Landscape Archaeology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ground Motion in Areas of Abandoned Mining: Application of the Intermittent SBAS (ISBAS) to the Northumberland and Durham Coalfield, UK
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ground Stability Monitoring of Undermined and Landslide Prone Areas by Means of Sentinel-1 Multi-Temporal InSAR, Case Study from Slovakia

1
Department of Theoretical Geodesy, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology, Radlinskeho 11, 810 05 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
2
insar.sk s.r.o., Lesna 35, 080 01 Presov, Slovak Republic
3
State Geological Institute of Dionyz Stur, Department of Engineering Geology, Mlynska dolina 1, 841 03 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Geosciences 2017, 7(3), 87; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7030087
Submission received: 14 July 2017 / Revised: 1 September 2017 / Accepted: 8 September 2017 / Published: 15 September 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Observing Geohazards from Space)

Abstract

:
Multi-temporal synthetic aperture radar interferometry techniques (MT-InSAR) are nowadays a well-developed remote sensing tool for ground stability monitoring of areas afflicted by natural hazards. Its application capability has recently been emphasized by the Sentinel-1 satellite mission, providing extensive spatial coverage, regular temporal sampling and free data availability. We perform MT-InSAR analysis over the wider Upper Nitra region in Slovakia, utilizing all Sentinel-1 images acquired since November 2014 until March 2017. This region is notable for its extensive landslide susceptibility as well as intensive brown coal mining. We focus on two case studies, being impaired by recent activation of these geohazards, which caused serious damage to local structures. We incorporate a processing chain based on open-source tools, combining the current Sentinel Application Platform (SNAP) and Stanford Method for Persistent Scatterers (StaMPS) implementation. MT-InSAR results reveal substantial activity at both case studies, exceeding the annual displacement velocities of 30 mm/year. Moreover, our observations are validated and their accuracy is confirmed via comparison with ground truth data from borehole inclinometers and terrestrial levelling. Detected displacement time series provide valuable insight into the spatio-temporal evolution of corresponding deformation phenomena and are thus complementary to conventional terrestrial monitoring techniques. At the same time, they not only demonstrate the feasibility of MT-InSAR for the assessment of remediation works, but also constitute the possibility of operational monitoring and routine landslide inventory updates, regarding the free Sentinel-1 data.

1. Introduction

Slope deformations are the most significant geohazards in Slovakia which annually cause an extensive economic damage, seriously limit the rational use of land and in rare cases also threaten human lives. This is conditioned by the complex geological setting of Slovakia, especially in Flysch regions and periphery of Neovolcanic regions, where landslides threaten up to 60% of the territory. Slopes within Neogene and Paleogene depressions are also substantially affected. Moreover, the activation or re-activation of relatively large amounts of landslides has been witnessed in recent years. Since 2010, more than 700 new slope failures have been registered and their activation was driven mainly by climatic anomalies, such as extraordinary rainfalls and melting snow cover. Many of these landslides currently represent a direct threat to the lives, health and property of the residents in the affected areas [1]. This fact has initiated their inclusion in the monitoring system built within the scope of the project “Partial-monitoring system—geological factors“ [2,3]. The stability condition of these sites is being observed by systematic geological, geotechnical (groundwater table level, borehole inclinometers), and geodetic (GNSS, levelling) measurements, as well as regular evaluation of climatic factors. All those conventional in-situ terrestrial monitoring methods, however, provide only point-wise information about temporal evolution of deformation phenomena, while requiring laborious and regular measurement campaigns. Another geohazard posing a threat for the residents of Slovakia is a subsidence due to undermining, related to the present or historical exploitation of brown coal, various ores or salts. Brown coal mining is still in operation in the Upper Nitra region in Central Slovakia, where a collapse due to undermining has led to the abandonment of two municipalities, or their parts—Laskar and Kos. Coal mining in the Upper Nitra region has been operated by the Hornonitrianske bane (HB) Prievidza Mining Company, which has also been monitoring the undermining subsidence using the classical geodetic survey at the surface and extensive underground monitoring by the methods of mining geodesy.
Monitoring of mass-wasting geohazards like landslides or land subsidence due to undermining has been marked by new perspective from remote sensing, especially thanks to satellite-borne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) interferometry (InSAR), which successfully attains geodetic precision at extended spatial coverage [4]. Multi-temporal SAR interferometry techniques (MT-InSAR) are nowadays a well-developed tool for ground stability monitoring. They aim to overcome the major limitations of conventional differential InSAR, employing the time series of SAR images to identify the radar targets, which do not change their backscattering characteristic over time and remain phase coherent. Those are referred to as persistent scatterers (PS) and generally correspond to man-made structures as well as stable natural reflectors (e.g., bare rocks or outcrops). For such points, temporal evolution of deformation can be retrieved, thus forming a natural, opportunistic geodetic network to monitor seismic activity, landslides, cities, or even individual structures [5,6,7]. This application capability has recently been emphasized by European Space Agency’s Copernicus operational programme of the Sentinel-1 satellite mission, providing guaranteed and freely available SAR images of the entire Earth’s landmass within a 6 day repeat cycle.

2. Study Area

The aim of this study is to test the feasibility of MT-InSAR technology within the Upper Nitra region, Central Slovakia, exploiting all to-date available Sentinel-1 data. The investigated territory spans approximately 440 km2—22 km in the longitudinal direction and 20 km in the latitudinal direction (Figure 1). This site is notable for its landslide susceptibility, as well as extensive coal mining activity. The mass movement processes are generated by the specific geological setting of the Vtacnik mountain range. Rigid volcanic rocks made of epiclastic volcanic conglomerates and breccias, pyroclastics and lava flows of Older to Middle Sarmatian age, form the summit parts and flanks of the mountain range [8]. They overlay softer complexes of Neogene sediments, prevailingly claystones, sandstones and siltstones, intercalated by brown coal seams. Slope deformations have a strong representation here, with almost all basic types of slope failures. In the summit parts of the mountain range, block ridges are present. Down the slope, detached blocks form block fields, and towards the Upper Nitra depression, landslides have evolved. Since Badenian complexes are known for rich deposits of brown coal, the unfavourable slope stability conditions have been impaired by underground mining, which at several sites has led to the acceleration of mass movements or to the subsidence of the territory above the mined-out underground spaces [9,10].
We closely investigate the above-mentioned geohazards on two case studies. The first study focuses on the suburbs of Prievidza city: Hradec, Velka and Mala Lehotka (Case study 1: Figure 2). The 2012–2013 reactivation of slope deformations in Hradec and Velka Lehotka caused serious damage to local infrastructure and buildings (Figure 3), leading to a declaration of an emergency situation. Consequently, landslides survey [11,12] and remediation [13] were implemented as inevitable steps, accomplished in 2014 and followed by the establishment of a monitoring network [3]. The remedial works mostly involved underground drainage by horizontal boreholes, combined with sand piles, drainage trenches and surface drains.
Brown coal in Upper Nitra is stored in Neogene deposits at the depth of 200–250 m with 2.5–28.4 m thickness, and other layers with 2.5–8.9 thickness are present in 120–510 m depths. Mining takes place in those depths without the fill, what is considered a technological peculiarity of this area. The large extent of long-term brown coal mining of the Cigel brown coal deposit (at a depth of around 200 m) activates surface deformations in the above area of Kos village (Case study 2: Figure 4) and spatially devastates the countryside. Since 1950, a building closure was declared in the north-western part of the Kos village, and mining began in 1988. Notable negative influences of mining are related not only to the ecosystems of the original landscape, but also to demographic changes due to the evacuation and withdrawal of former inhabitants. Population of the village has since decreased from the original 3500 to today’s approximately 1200 inhabitants. The undermined areas of ≈158 ha are affected by strong subsidence movements, and the formation of several depressions (over area of ≈58 ha) is evidenced. Number of slope failures are induced over the undermined fields, which are continually subsiding during the mining activities. Therefore, the location, total area and depth of the depressions are changing dynamically over time. The predicted maximum decrease is in the range of 4–7 m with 3–5 m depth of the groundwater table level, what has resulted for example in formation of wetlands [15].
The 3D model of the respective brown coal deposit was created on the basis of mining data of the HB Company, a.s. within the project [16]. The subsidence of the area, which was reflected in the creation of ponds, was monitored via satellite and aerial images acquired in years 1987, 2001, 2004, 2006 and 2007. In 2007, these areas were surveyed by geodetic methods, revealing that the subsidence had begun within 1–2 years after the coal seams were extracted. The extent of the worked out spaces and related sinkholes, often indicated by lakes and wetlands, is depicted in the Figure 4b.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Sentinel-1 Dataset

We performed MT-InSAR ground stability analysis over the wider Upper Nitra region, utilizing 150 C-band Sentinel-1 SAR images per both of its ascending (78) and descending (72) orbits, which cover the time period from November 2014 till March 2017. Figure 1 depicts subsets of Sentinel-1 IWS scenes for ascending track No. 175 and descending track No. 51 over the area of interest (AOI). Due to very small perpendicular baseline distribution secured by stable Sentinel-1 orbital tube, as well as regular temporal sampling of acquisitions, forming single-master image combinations provides stable and rigorous geodetic time series [17]. Interferometric image combinations employed in processing are represented by Figure 5. Master images were selected approximately in the barycentre of the temporal and perpendicular baseline domain, with regard to atmospheric conditions during the time of acquisition. Hence the acquisition time of master images were chosen so that no precipitation or notable overcast was reported [18].

3.2. MT-InSAR Processing

We incorporated the processing chain (please refer to flowchart in Figure 6) based solely on open-source tools. First processing segment was carried out under current Sentinel Application Platform (SNAP), being developed for ESA by Array Systems Computing under GPL (free, libre and open-source) license [19]. Thanks to its graph processing tool utility, we wrote series of scripts to automate the processing of whole stacks of Sentinel-1 SLC images in batch fashion.
Regarding the large size of original SLC data and associated high computational demands, the prime step involved the extraction of bursts covering the AOI. Then, the orbit state vectors of individual scenes were refined using Sentinel-1 precise orbit ephemerides, published by ESA on [20]. Sentinel-1 operates in a unique acquisition mode TOPS (Terrain Observation by Progressive Scans) [21], which captures images consisting of series of bursts with mutual overlaps. This provides wide swath width with a reasonable spatial resolution of 5 m × 20 m. Sentinel-1 TOPS SLC images, however, require a specific coregistration approach regarding the correct burst stitching (according to [22], an azimuth coregistration accuracy of 0.003 samples is required to achieve a phase error of less than 10 degrees). The main advantage of SNAP inclusion is its current state-of-the-art performance in TOPS coregistration. Note that TOPS coregistration operator in second step (consisting of back-geocoding and enhanced-spectral diversity correction) was carried out burst-wise, in order to make use of the entire burst overlap as well as retaining a sufficiently coherent area. Coregistration was assisted by SRTM 1 arc second digital elevation model (DEM) [23]. The AOI was subsequently cropped from de-bursted stacks, which was followed by differential interferogram formation, again employing SRTM 1 DEM. The output data are SLC stacks and differential interferograms coregistered onto a common master image frame, plus a geocoding mask. Geocoding based on orbital data and DEM is limited to positional accuracy within several metres, depending on the resolution of SLC data.
Multi-temporal PS processing was carried out in StaMPS (Stanford Method for Persistent Scatterers) software implementation [24]. Standard PSInSAR technique (originally presented by [5]) selects PS candidates based on their phase variation in time, presuming a temporally linear deformation model; whilst StaMPS methodology exploits the spatial correlation of their phase without prior assumptions about its temporal nature [25]. Therefore StaMPS succeeds in the identification of less bright scatterers with lower SCR (signal-to-clutter), and thus provides denser PS coverage even in sparsely urbanized and natural terrain. The processing procedure followed steps, closely described in [24,26,27]:
  • Apriori PS candidates selection based on the 0.4 amplitude dispersion threshold.
  • Iterative phase stability estimation of PS candidates (analyzing their phase noise term).
  • PS selection based on ensemble temporal coherence in a probabilistic fashion.
  • Side-lobes elimination.
  • Elimination of phase contribution due to residual topography (DEM error).
  • 3D phase unwrapping.
  • Estimation of spatially-correlated nuisance terms (atmosphere and orbital phase contributions).
Careful selection of processing parameters was required to avoid aliasing of the deformation signal, especially the size of resampling grid for unwrapping and window sizes of temporal and Goldstein filter [28] applied prior to unwrapping. The unwrapping procedure was followed by thorough detection and correction of possible phase unwrapping errors with regard to phase time series, as illustrated by e.g., [29]. Such errors occurred where the deformation pattern was not smooth.
After reasonable mitigation of phase unwrapping errors and spatially-correlated error terms, some atmospheric signal still persisted in the estimate. To date, several strategies for the elimination of tropospheric phase delays were developed, e.g., employing weather models, GNSS measurements or spectrometer data [30,31]. However, these are often limited by the spatio-temporal resolution or a non-simultaneous acquisition of sensors. With respect to the smaller extent of our AOI, we estimated the tropospheric phase screens and their stratification for each acquisition date empirically from the relationship between the interferometric phase and the topography, as proposed by [32] and implemented in Toolbox for Reducing Atmospheric InSAR Noise (TRAIN). It is important to note that strong tropospheric turbulence, albeit not expected in our AOI, cannot be accounted for using only phase-based correction methods and would leak into the residual phase as an incorrect signal [32].
Finally, unwrapped residual phase time series were converted to displacement via sensors wavelength. Mean annual velocities of displacement were then estimated in the least squares sense by inversion of the linear movement model.

4. Results and Discussion

The basic and most commonly used representation of MT-InSAR analysis are ground deformation maps, depicting mean line-of-sight (LOS) annual velocities of individual PSs. Concerning the reliability of the estimate, its indicator is ensemble temporal coherence (as a maximum of periodogram). Hence the most common, albeit harsh practice for outlier elimination is thresholding on ensemble temporal coherence only. Though in order to preserve as much information as possible, we applied outlier elimination approach proposed by [33], which allows for the minimisation of outliers in final results while preserving spatial and statistical dependency among the observations. This approach preserved a valuable amount of 28,101 points for the ascending track and 25,957 points for the descending track (representing approximately 25 percent of whole point-cloud), that would have been otherwise discarded by standard coherence thresholding. Outlier-free mean LOS velocity deformation maps for both ascending and descending datasets are in Figure 7. Those are relative to a common reference area (depicted by a black rectangle). Reference area is situated in the old central part of Prievidza city. Its stability was discussed with geologists and verified in-situ.
Mean velocities are displayed in a common interval of ± 30 mm/year. Their average values are less than 0.01 mm/year for both ascending and descending datasets, with an approximately normal distribution. Mean values of standard deviations are 0.67 mm/year for the ascending and 0.74 mm/year for the descending dataset. Although the small values of standard deviations may seem outstanding, they actually correspond to precision, not accuracy. Precision is strongly influenced by the number of images, i.e., the degree of freedom of the estimate. Higher standard deviation does not necessarily correspond to noisier scatterers, as non-linear deformation could also push this value up [4]. To assess the accuracy of the results, calibration methods employing artificial corner reflectors or compact active transponders are required [34].
We achieved solid coverage over urban and peri-urban areas, yet several clusters of points were successfully retrieved even in rural parts of the AOI (amidst arid fields or outcrops). Deformation maps provide a global outlook on the relative movements in the whole area of interest, and thus show that no large spatial wavelength deformation signal is present. At the same time, they demarcate distinct small-areas of detected spatially clustered motion. We focus on the two already introduced and most significant geohazards within the Upper Nitra region.

4.1. Case Study 1: Landslides

InSAR results reveal that Hradec and Velka Lehotka (suburbs of Prievidza city) are affected by severe slope deformation processes. While those are undergoing movement towards the satellite on ascending track (Figure 8a), respective PSs exhibit movement away from the satellite for a descending track results (Figure 8b). This feature is a consequence of prevailing horizontal direction of actual displacement vector, as illustrated by Figure 9.
Interpretation of surface movements is generally challenging when dealing with LOS displacement velocities. Assuming major sensitivity to vertical displacement and ignoring the presence of a potential horizontal one can introduce large errors into the final estimates if using mere projection via incidence angle [35]. Moreover, Sentinel-1 TOPS acquisition look angles are way larger than those of legacy ERS or Envisat satellites, what further expands this vulnerability. Yet, thanks to the availability of both acquisition geometries, LOS velocities can be further decomposed into vertical component and horizontal component in descending azimuth look direction (Figure 9).
Considering that ascending and descending stacks are related to different reference frames and individual PSs might actually correspond to different structures due to the strong directional dependence of the scattering mechanism, such decomposition encounters problem of PS pixel-matching. Hence we apply a simplified, three step approach:
  • Mean LOS velocities are resampled into regular 50 m × 50 m grid.
  • The grid is subsequently filled by the weighted average of all PS’s velocities allocated within individual cells. Temporal coherence is assumed a weighting factor.
  • Finally, decomposition is evaluated using the system of equations in accordance to [36]. Its outcome is visualised by Figure 10.
The detected movement activity is in a good agreement with the slope failure delineation and its direction mapped by [14]. Minor discrepancies occur only in the northern part of Velka Lehotka village (the southern one). In 2013, several buildings were damaged, which, according to the above-mentioned map, are situated beyond the boundary of the potential landslides. InSAR observations, however, show ongoing activity, especially in the eastern sector. Most unstable parts lie on the Handlova Formation (tuffs and sandstones) and correspond mainly to the landslide deluvia. Several PSs in central part of Hradec village (north-eastern one) even exceed the values of 3 cm/year. Stable northern section of the village, which rests upon a block formed by lava flows of pyroxene andesite, is clearly separated by landslide boundary. Structural failure of buildings is most common in these areas. On the contrary, in the central part of the village, where the greatest velocities are observed, the buildings are “carried“ by landslide body without the impact on their construction. Similar, but smoother division is also observable in Velka Lehotka village. Results visualization in terms of displacement velocity maps is for many instances insufficient, as they do not reveal the valuable content in the displacement time series of each individual PS. In order to validate InSAR observations, PS time series were compared with independent ground measurements in borehole inclinometers. Since the measurements are of a different nature, they are displayed in individual graphs. Moreover, considering the geocoding uncertainty, collocation of points is only approximate. Therefore the closest, well coherent PSs are chosen for comparison. Figure 11 shows two examples of such comparison with precise borehole inclinometers codenamed IGH-5i and IGH-1i.
The two example boreholes characterize distinct landslide bodies (see Figure 8). Borehole IGH-5i is located in the most active part of the slope deformation with a clearly developed shear zone (Figure 11a). Installation of a stationary inclinometer in the nearby IGP-10i borehole has confirmed that the territory is permanently in motion. Average displacement velocities range from 7 to 68 mm/year, dominantly depending upon climatic factors. Although the shear zone is less evident at borehole IGH-1i (Figure 11c), the presence of landsliding activity is recognizable at nearby buildings (Figure 11d) and fences, broken by fractures.
While the method of precise inclinometry provides information on the deformation evolution at particular depths of borehole and directly determines the shear zone, the surface associated InSAR observations enable to assess the deformation phenomena across the whole sliding areas. Therefore, those information are complementary in terms of their spatial scope. Comparison with borehole displacement values confirmed the presence, extent and magnitude of slope deformations. Periods of larger movement activity and sudden activation coincide between epochs of inclinometry measurements (vertical colour lines in PS displacement time series). Variations of slope movement activity could be presumably caused by seasonal changes of climatic factors and the related groundwater table level, being one of its major activators [3]. Besides, the magnitude of sub-surface cumulative displacement at shallow depths in IGH-5i borehole adheres to surface ones, as apparent from the time series. Displacement time series tend to gradually stabilize towards the end of an observation period. Finally, note the PS time series variance decrease, stiffened by higher sample rate since October 2016 as a benefit of Sentinel-1B integration. Altogether 30 Sentinel-1B images were employed within processing for ascending (15) and for descending (15) track.
Implementation of InSAR observations within the conventional landslide monitoring techniques is of a major significance, as it helps to better understand the surface deformation pattern throughout the sliding body, its spatial and temporal evolution, as well as to assess the success of remediation works (which have been, in this particular case, deemed insufficient). This underscores the operational capability of Sentinel-1 data for routine updates of landslide inventory maps on a weekly basis, which could even contribute to development of early warning systems.

4.2. Case Study 2: Land Subsidence Due to Undermining

Major part of Kos municipality is afflicted by significant loss of coherence due to fast deformation rates and formation of wetlands, as a consequence of land subsidence down below average groundwater level. According to [15], depth of some depressions reaches up to several meters. Theoretical maximum deformation rate observable by InSAR is half a wavelength per revisit time, i.e., 42.6 cm/year for C-band Sentinel-1 [4]. This actually also depends on the noise level and the phase unwrapping technique [37]. Therefore, identifications of PSs in northwestern part of Kos village fails.
Nonetheless, we managed to retrieve several reliable PSs in the southeastern part of village from the descending track, which exhibit coherent deformation as depicted by Figure 12. While the smaller-magnitude subsidence is noticeable even at PSs remote from mining affected areas, displacement values slowly increase towards the directly undermined territory, reaching rates higher than 3 cm/year. Since results from the ascending track are generally noisier and without coherent points over the affected area even after multi-variate outlier elimination (see Figure 7), LOS decomposition was not performed.
Detected deformation trends have been confirmed by comparison with terrestrial levelling at benchmarks coded SNS-8.1, VBK-3, VBK-4, VBK-20 and VBK-22, illustrated by Figure 13. Dividing LOS velocities by the directional cosine of the incident angle, we obtain approximate values of vertical components for comparison purposes.
Independent displacements time series strongly correlate, especially at benchmark VKB-20, and thus provide the notion about the relative accuracy of InSAR observations. Sole levelling time series of benchmark VBK-14 are also presented in order to illustrate the magnitude of fast deformation rates (exceeding 3 m/year) occurring within the western part of the village, lying directly above the mining corridors. Displacement evolution of some points tends to stabilize (VBK-3, VBK-22), while for example VBK-20 exhibits a non-linear trend with activation since summer 2015, which could have been caused by the restoration of mining activities and the increase of their extent.
Proof of an extreme subsidence occurring in the old westernmost part of Kos village, devoid of PSs, is provided by differences between UAV and LiDAR-derived digital elevation models in Figure 14. The former DEM was derived from Trimble® UX5 (Geotronics Slovakia and Slovak University of Technology) measurement campaign carried out in March 2016 and processed by Agisoft® PhotoScan (Agisoft LLC, St. Petersburg, Russia). Average density of ground filtered point cloud reached 20 points/m2. The latter DEM was generated on the basis of Trimble® Harrier 68i LiDAR system (Zilinska University and Slovak University of Technology) measurements which took place in November 2016. Through processing by LAStools (rapidlasso GmbH, Germany), we achieved average density of ground filtered point cloud of 15 points/m2. For both cases, DEM pixel size is 50 cm, and vertical accuracy better than 10 cm was confirmed via independent ground control points. DEM comparison reveals a distinct north-western body of Kos village subsiding down 7 m over 8 months period. This gives a clear notion why the identification of coherent PSs using C-band data was impossible for this particular area. The consequences of undermining are evident not only geomorphologically, but also on structures and infrastructure (Figure 15). Several houses in northwestern and central parts of the village have already been demolished; the remaining, still inhabited houses in central part are continually exposed to risk. Sentinel-1 MT-InSAR proves to be able to secure remote and cost-effective stability monitoring of those structures, comparable to conventional monitoring techniques in terms of accuracy, yet maintaining the vast spatial coverage. Its limitation concerning the maximum observable deformation rate could be partially overcome by different MT-InSAR techniques, e.g., Small Baseline Subset (SBAS) [38], employing data from longer wavelength sensors [39], or even by exploitation of the amplitude information of SAR images [40].

5. Conclusions

We have demonstrated the capabilities of open-source MT-InSAR tools SNAP & StaMPS in conjunction with the open-access Sentinel-1 data to monitor the most significant geohazards in the Upper Nitra region, Central Slovakia. Compared to point-wise terrestrial monitoring techniques, the advantages of MT-InSAR combine reasonable spatial coverage, assured temporal sampling and the capability to remotely assess the historic as well as ongoing deformation phenomena at low-cost merit, regarding the Sentinel data. We have investigated currently active slope deformations in Hradec and Velka Lehotka suburbs of the Prievidza city, where major part of villages exhibits coherent, dominantly westward displacements, while annual velocities of some PSs even exceed the values of 3 cm/year even after remediation works. Thanks to the application of multi-variate outlier post-processing analysis, we retained valuable PSs in affected areas, which would have been otherwise (imposing the standard coherence threshold) undersampled. Moreover, we have managed to identify several rapidly subsiding PSs in the dynamically changing environment of the undermined area of Kos municipality. Our observations have been validated via comparison with ground truth data from borehole inclinometers and terrestrial levelling. Outcomes of this analysis have enhanced our understanding of deformation patterns and their spatio-temporal progression. Assuming the detailed analysis of PS kinematic time series along with routine updates of deformation maps, those could contribute to development of early warning systems. Thus the classification of deformation trends based on conditional sequence of statistical tests (as proposed by e.g., [41] or [42]) is among the planned steps for respective case studies. Since both case study deformation phenomena can still be considered substantially active and a number of buildings are subject to continual damage, assessment of remediation works and operational routine monitoring is of utmost importance. Exploiting the free Sentinel-1 data by means of multi-temporal InSAR techniques constitutes to be capable of such task. Therefore, the main future objective involves pilot operational monitoring of at least hereby presented areas, supported by the communication with State Geological Institute of Dionyz Stur, HB mining company and local authorities. Finally, efficient installation of artificial corner reflectors or active radio transponders [43] shall further increase the density of PS at critical sites lacking any strong natural scatterers.

Acknowledgments

Sentinel-1 data were provided by ESA under free, full and open data policy adopted for the Copernicus programme. StaMPS and TRAIN software packages are freely distributed under GNU-GPL license and were developed at the University of Leeds (namely by Andrew Hooper and David Bekaert). This work has been supported by the Slovak Grant Agency VEGA under projects No. 1/0714/15 and 1/0462/16. The authors would like to thank State Geological Institute of Dionyz Stur and Hornonitrianske bane Prievidza, a.s. (namely M. Plakinger) for providing ground truth data, discussion and collaboration.

Author Contributions

Richard Czikhardt scripted the data processing chain. Richard Czikhardt, Juraj Papco and Matus Bakon performed the data processing and analyzed the results. Pavel Liscak, Peter Ondrejka and Marian Zlocha assisted with the interpretation of results, enlightened their geological background and provided geological ground truth data. Richard Czikhardt drafted the article. All authors contributed to the finalization of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liscak, P.; Ondrejka, P.; Simekova, P.; Petro, L.; Paudits, P.; Zilka, A.; Maslarova, I.; Iglarova, L.; Madaras, J. Actual emergency landslides in Slovakia (2011–2014). Geol. Prac. Spravy 2014, 124, 71–88. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
  2. Wagner, P.; Ondrejka, P.; Iglarova, L.; Frastia, M. Current trends in monitoring of slope movements. Miner. Slovaca 2014, 42, 229–240. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
  3. Ondrejka, P.; Bakon, M.; Papco, J.; Liscak, P. Monitoring of sliding activity of the territory Prievidza-Hradec. Geotechnika 2016, 1/2016, 3–12, (In Slovak with English summary). [Google Scholar]
  4. Crosetto, M.; Monserrat, O.; Cuevas-González, M.; Devanthéry, N.; Crippa, B. Persistent Scatterer Interferometry: A review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2016, 115, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ferretti, A.; Prati, C.; Rocca, F. Permanent scatterers in SAR interferometry. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2001, 39, 8–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Colesanti, C.; Locatelli, R.; Novali, F. Ground deformation monitoring exploiting SAR permanent scatterers. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Toronto, ON, Canada, 24–28 June 2002; Volume 2, pp. 1219–1221. [Google Scholar]
  7. Atzori, S.; Manunta, M.; Fornaro, G.; Ganas, A.; Salvi, S. Postseismic displacement of the 1999 Athens earthquake retrieved by the Differential Interferometry by Synthetic Aperture Radar time series. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 2008, 113, B09309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Šimon, L.; Elečko, M.; Lexa, J.; Pristaš, J.; Halouzka, R.; Konečný, V.; Gross, P.; Kohút, M.; Mello, J.; Polák, M.; et al. Geological Map of the Vtacnik Mts. and Upper Nitra Depression, 1:50,000; Geological Survey of Slovak Republic: Bratislava, Slovakia, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  9. Nemcok, A. Landslides in Slovak Carpathians; Veda Publishers, Slovak Academy of Sciences: Bratislava, Slovakia, 1982; p. 319, (In Slovak with English summary). [Google Scholar]
  10. Malgot, J.; Nemčok, A.; Jesenák, J.; Šajgalík, J.; Baliak, F.; Mahr, T.; Čabalová, D.; Masarovičová, M.; Abelovič, J.; Gregor, V.; et al. Engineering Geological Assessment of Geosystems, Part 2—Stability of Slopes and Subsoil of Constructions; Final Report; SGUDS Archive: Bratislava, Slovakia, 1985. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
  11. Ilkanič, A.; Jasovská, A.; Nigrínyová, J.; Pilko, M.; Vasiľko, T.; Smrek, M. Engineering Geological Survey of the Affected Sites in Velka Lehotka and Hradec; Final Report; MoE SR, SGUDS Archive: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2013; p. 50. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
  12. Fekeč, P.; Ilkanič, A. Realisation of Remedial Measures in Velka Lehotka, Hradec and Kraľovany. Consortium Engineering Geological Survey and Remediation of Emergency Landslides at Selected Sites of Slovakia; Kosper, a.s.: Prague, Czech Republic, 2014; p. 33. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
  13. Tupý, P.; Ilkanič, A.; Masiar, R.; Mišuth, K. Remediation of Emergency Landslides in Velka Lehotka and Hradec (Part I.). Consortium “Sanácia Prievidza“; TMG, a.s.: Prievidza, Slovakia, 2014; p. 37. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
  14. Malgot, J.; Baliak, F.; Mahr, T. Map of Vtacnik Slope Failures 1:10,000; Slovak Cartography: Bratislava, Slovakia, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  15. David, S. Landscape-Ecological, Environmental and Socio-Economic Consequences of Coal Mining in the Kos Cadastre. Zivotne Prostr. 2010, 44, 40–44. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gregor, T.; Zlocha, M.; Vybíral, V.; Čapo, J.; Lanc, J.; Kováčik, M.; Bednarik, M.; Hrabinová, J.; Pivovarči, M. Application of Remote Sensing at Monitoring of Environment Loads Impact Upon Geofactors in Selected Regions; Final Report; SGUDS Archive: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2008; p. 657. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
  17. Perissin, D.; Wang, T. Repeat-Pass SAR Interferometry With Partially Coherent Targets. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2012, 50, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Weather Underground, Inc. History & Data Archive. Available online: https://www.wunderground.com/history/ (accessed on 14 September 2017).
  19. Sentinel Application Platform (SNAP). Sentinel-1 Toolbox. Available online: https://qc.sentinel1.eo.esa.int/ (accessed on 14 September 2017).
  20. Sentinel Payload Data Ground Segment (PDGS). Sentinel-1 Quality Control. Available online: https://github.com/senbox-org/s1tbx (accessed on 14 September 2017).
  21. Zan, F.D.; Guarnieri, A.M. TOPSAR: Terrain Observation by Progressive Scans. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2006, 44, 2352–2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Prats-Iraola, P.; Scheiber, R.; Marotti, L.; Wollstadt, S.; Reigber, A. TOPS Interferometry With TerraSAR-X. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2012, 50, 3179–3188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Jarvis, A.; Reuter, H.I.; Nelson, A.; Guevara, E. Hole-filled SRTM for the Globe Version 4. CGIAR-CSI SRTM 90 m Database. Available online: http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org (accessed on 14 September 2017).
  24. Hooper, A.; Bekaert, D.; Spaans, K.; Arıkan, M. Recent advances in SAR interferometry time series analysis for measuring crustal deformation. Tectonophysics 2012, 514–517, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hooper, A.; Zebker, H.; Segall, P.; Kampes, B. A New Method for Measuring Deformation on Volcanoes and Other Natural Terrains Using InSAR Persistent Scatterers. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2004, 31, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hooper, A. Persistent Scatterer Radar Interferometry for Crustal Deformation Studies and Modeling of Volcanic Deformation. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hooper, A.; Zebker, H.A. Phase Unwrapping in Three Dimensions with Application to InSAR Time Series. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2007, 24, 2737–2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Goldstein, R.M.; Werner, C.L. Radar interferogram filtering for geophysical applications. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1998, 25, 4035–4038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Notti, D.; Calò, F.; Cigna, F.; Manunta, M.; Herrera, G.; Berti, M.; Meisina, C.; Tapete, D.; Zucca, F. A user-oriented methodology for DInSAR time series analysis and interpretation: Landslides and subsidence case studies. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2015, 172, 3081–3105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Liu, S. Satellite Radar Interferometry: Estimation of Atmospheric Delay. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  31. Bekaert, D.P.S.; Hooper, A.; Wright, T.J. Reassessing the 2006 Guerrero slow-slip event, Mexico: Implications for large earthquakes in the Guerrero Gap. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 2015, 120, 1357–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bekaert, D.; Walters, R.; Wright, T.; Hooper, A.; Parker, D. Statistical comparison of InSAR tropospheric correction techniques. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 170, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bakon, M.; Oliveira, I.; Perissin, D.; Sousa, J.J.; Papco, J. A Data Mining Approach for Multivariate Outlier Detection in Postprocessing of Multitemporal InSAR Results. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2017, 10, 2791–2798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mahapatra, P.; van der Marel, H.; van Leijen, F.; Samiei-Esfahany, S.; Klees, R.; Hanssen, R. InSAR datum connection using GNSS-augmented radar transponders. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Beijing, China, 10–15 July 2016. [Google Scholar]
  35. Samieie-Esfahany, S.; Hanssen, R.; van Thienen-Visser, K.; Muntendam-Bos, A. On the effect of horizontal deformation on InSAR subsidence estimates. In Proceedings of the Fringe 2009 Workshop, Frascati, Italy, 30 November–4 December 2009; European Space Agency (Special Publication): Paris, France, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ketelaar, V.B.H.G. Satellite Radar Interferometry: Subsidence Monitoring Techniques; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  37. van Leijen, F. Persistent Scatterer Interferometry Based on Geodetic Estimation Theory. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  38. Berardino, P.; Fornaro, G.; Lanari, R.; Sansosti, E. A New Algorithm for Surface Deformation Monitoring Based on Small Baseline Differential SAR Interferograms. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2002, 40, 2375–2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chaussard, E.; Amelung, F.; Abidin, H.; Hong, S.H. Sinking cities in Indonesia: ALOS PALSAR detects rapid subsidence due to groundwater and gas extraction. Remote Sens. Environ. 2013, 128, 150–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Huang, J.; Deng, K.; Fan, H.; Yan, S. An improved pixel-tracking method for monitoring mining subsidence. Remote Sens. Lett. 2016, 7, 731–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Berti, M.; Corsini, A.; Franceschini, S.; Iannacone, J.P. Automated classification of Persistent Scatterers Interferometry time series. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2013, 13, 1945–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chang, L.; Hanssen, R.F. A Probabilistic Approach for InSAR Time-Series Postprocessing. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2016, 54, 421–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mahapatra, P.; Samiei-Esfahany, S.; van der Marel, H.; Hanssen, R. On the Use of Transponders as Coherent Radar Targets for SAR Interferometry. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2014, 52, 1869–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Area of interest (AOI) covering the Upper Nitra region, Slovakia. Basemap: Google, 2017 CNES.
Figure 1. Area of interest (AOI) covering the Upper Nitra region, Slovakia. Basemap: Google, 2017 CNES.
Geosciences 07 00087 g001
Figure 2. Case study 1: Slope deformations in Hradec, Velka a Mala Lehotka suburbs of Prievidza city, mapped by [14].
Figure 2. Case study 1: Slope deformations in Hradec, Velka a Mala Lehotka suburbs of Prievidza city, mapped by [14].
Geosciences 07 00087 g002
Figure 3. Photo-examples of structural damage in Hradec and Velka Lehotka (case study 1) caused by local slope deformations, (a) April 2012, Photo courtesy: Google Street View; (b) and (c) July 2017.
Figure 3. Photo-examples of structural damage in Hradec and Velka Lehotka (case study 1) caused by local slope deformations, (a) April 2012, Photo courtesy: Google Street View; (b) and (c) July 2017.
Geosciences 07 00087 g003
Figure 4. Case study 2: Undermined area of Kos village, Upper Nitra region. (a) White areas represent undermined corridors as of May 2017; (b) 3D model of the Cigel brown coal deposit—blue: ponds and wetlands, violet: mined out blocks (thickness exaggerated 3×) and green: perpendiculars from the lake centers.
Figure 4. Case study 2: Undermined area of Kos village, Upper Nitra region. (a) White areas represent undermined corridors as of May 2017; (b) 3D model of the Cigel brown coal deposit—blue: ponds and wetlands, violet: mined out blocks (thickness exaggerated 3×) and green: perpendiculars from the lake centers.
Geosciences 07 00087 g004
Figure 5. Interferometric combinations of Sentinel-1 SLC images from (a) ascending and (b) descending track.
Figure 5. Interferometric combinations of Sentinel-1 SLC images from (a) ascending and (b) descending track.
Geosciences 07 00087 g005
Figure 6. Multi-temporal InSAR analysis incorporated by the SNAP & StaMPS processing chain.
Figure 6. Multi-temporal InSAR analysis incorporated by the SNAP & StaMPS processing chain.
Geosciences 07 00087 g006
Figure 7. Mean line-of-sight (LOS) deformation velocity maps produced from (a) ascending and (b) descending Sentinel-1 stacks. Outlier elimination has already been performed. Red values indicate movement away from the satellite, whereas blue values indicate movement towards the satellite. Basemaps: Google, 2017 CNES.
Figure 7. Mean line-of-sight (LOS) deformation velocity maps produced from (a) ascending and (b) descending Sentinel-1 stacks. Outlier elimination has already been performed. Red values indicate movement away from the satellite, whereas blue values indicate movement towards the satellite. Basemaps: Google, 2017 CNES.
Geosciences 07 00087 g007
Figure 8. Hradec and Velka Lehotka landslides as observed by Sentinel-1 MT-InSAR: mean line-of-sight (LOS) deformation velocity maps from (a) ascending and (b) descending track. Purple triangles represent borehole inclinometry monitoring network. Basemap: Google, 2017 CNES.
Figure 8. Hradec and Velka Lehotka landslides as observed by Sentinel-1 MT-InSAR: mean line-of-sight (LOS) deformation velocity maps from (a) ascending and (b) descending track. Purple triangles represent borehole inclinometry monitoring network. Basemap: Google, 2017 CNES.
Geosciences 07 00087 g008
Figure 9. LOS velocities decomposition principle, specific case of Hradec landslide (Figure 8).
Figure 9. LOS velocities decomposition principle, specific case of Hradec landslide (Figure 8).
Geosciences 07 00087 g009
Figure 10. Decomposition of InSAR LOS velocities (Figure 8) into (a) vertical component and (b) horizontal (approximately E-W) component. Basemap: Google, 2017 CNES and ZBGIS topography, GKU Slovakia.
Figure 10. Decomposition of InSAR LOS velocities (Figure 8) into (a) vertical component and (b) horizontal (approximately E-W) component. Basemap: Google, 2017 CNES and ZBGIS topography, GKU Slovakia.
Geosciences 07 00087 g010
Figure 11. (a); (c) Comparison of InSAR derived LOS displacement time series (from descending track) with borehole inclinometer measurements at points IGH-5i (depth of shear zone: 4.61 m, mean displacement velocity: 18.9 mm/year, orientation: northwest-west) and IGH-1i (expected depth of shear zone: 3.44 m, mean displacement velocity: 1.2 mm/year, orientation: southwest), adjacent to (b); (d) disrupted structures.
Figure 11. (a); (c) Comparison of InSAR derived LOS displacement time series (from descending track) with borehole inclinometer measurements at points IGH-5i (depth of shear zone: 4.61 m, mean displacement velocity: 18.9 mm/year, orientation: northwest-west) and IGH-1i (expected depth of shear zone: 3.44 m, mean displacement velocity: 1.2 mm/year, orientation: southwest), adjacent to (b); (d) disrupted structures.
Geosciences 07 00087 g011
Figure 12. Kos village subsidence due to undermining as observed by MT-InSAR: mean line-of-sight (LOS) deformation velocity map from descending track with detail of area monitored by levelling network. Basemap: Google, 2017 CNES.
Figure 12. Kos village subsidence due to undermining as observed by MT-InSAR: mean line-of-sight (LOS) deformation velocity map from descending track with detail of area monitored by levelling network. Basemap: Google, 2017 CNES.
Geosciences 07 00087 g012
Figure 13. Comparison of PS deformation time series (from descending track, projected onto the vertical component) with levelling. Points (a) SNS-8.1; (b) VBK-4; (c) VBK-20; (d) VBK-22; (e) VBK-3; (f) VBK-14.
Figure 13. Comparison of PS deformation time series (from descending track, projected onto the vertical component) with levelling. Points (a) SNS-8.1; (b) VBK-4; (c) VBK-20; (d) VBK-22; (e) VBK-3; (f) VBK-14.
Geosciences 07 00087 g013
Figure 14. Kos village subsidence due to undermining as observed by digital elevation model differences between March 2016 and November 2016. Digital elevation models were generated using UAV photogrammetry and LiDAR. Basemap: Google, 2017 CNES.
Figure 14. Kos village subsidence due to undermining as observed by digital elevation model differences between March 2016 and November 2016. Digital elevation models were generated using UAV photogrammetry and LiDAR. Basemap: Google, 2017 CNES.
Geosciences 07 00087 g014
Figure 15. Consequences of Kos village subsidence: (a) Formation of wetlands (April 2004); (b) Infrastructural damage (December 2016), (c) Geomorphological changes (March 2016).
Figure 15. Consequences of Kos village subsidence: (a) Formation of wetlands (April 2004); (b) Infrastructural damage (December 2016), (c) Geomorphological changes (March 2016).
Geosciences 07 00087 g015

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Czikhardt, R.; Papco, J.; Bakon, M.; Liscak, P.; Ondrejka, P.; Zlocha, M. Ground Stability Monitoring of Undermined and Landslide Prone Areas by Means of Sentinel-1 Multi-Temporal InSAR, Case Study from Slovakia. Geosciences 2017, 7, 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7030087

AMA Style

Czikhardt R, Papco J, Bakon M, Liscak P, Ondrejka P, Zlocha M. Ground Stability Monitoring of Undermined and Landslide Prone Areas by Means of Sentinel-1 Multi-Temporal InSAR, Case Study from Slovakia. Geosciences. 2017; 7(3):87. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7030087

Chicago/Turabian Style

Czikhardt, Richard, Juraj Papco, Matus Bakon, Pavel Liscak, Peter Ondrejka, and Marian Zlocha. 2017. "Ground Stability Monitoring of Undermined and Landslide Prone Areas by Means of Sentinel-1 Multi-Temporal InSAR, Case Study from Slovakia" Geosciences 7, no. 3: 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7030087

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop