Next Article in Journal
Retailers’ Responsibility towards Consumers and Key Drivers of Their Development in Poland
Previous Article in Journal
Determinants of Academic Startups’ Orientation toward International Business Expansion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Administrative Sciences in 2016

by
Administrative Sciences Editorial Office
MDPI AG, St. Alban-Anlage 66, 4052 Basel, Switzerland
Adm. Sci. 2017, 7(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci7010002
Submission received: 10 January 2017 / Revised: 10 January 2017 / Accepted: 10 January 2017 / Published: 10 January 2017
The editors of Administrative Sciences would like to express their sincere gratitude to the following reviewers for assessing manuscripts in 2016.
We greatly appreciate the contribution of expert reviewers, which is crucial to the journal’s editorial process. We aim to recognize reviewer contributions through several mechanisms, of which the annual publication of reviewer names is one. Reviewers receive a voucher entitling them to a discount on their next MDPI publication and can download a certificate of recognition directly from our submission system. Additionally, reviewers can sign up to the service Publons (https://publons.com) to receive recognition. Of course, in these initiatives we are careful not to compromise reviewer confidentiality. Many reviewers see their work as a voluntary and often unseen part of their role as researchers. We are grateful to the time reviewers donate to our journals and the contribution they make.
If you are interested in becoming a reviewer for Administrative Sciences, see the link at the bottom of the webpage https://www.mdpi.com/reviewers.
The following reviewed for Administrative Sciences in 2016:
Alexander, AllenHighhouse, ScottRoby, Helen
Baron, MarkHodgkinson, Gerard PRosch, David Michael
Brohman, KathrynIka, LavagnonSaaty, Thomas
Bugge, Markus M.Jackson, PeterSalman, Baris
Burns, Neal M.Johansen, AgnarSánchez-Bueno, María J.
Cantarelli, Chantal C.Jonathan, BostonSandiford, Peter John
Cheney, GeorgeJucker, MichaelSankaran, Shankar
Ciccotosto, SueKim, BowonSchramm-Klein, Hanna
Ciocirlan, CristinaKirytopoulos, Konstantinos A.Sillup, George P.
Coenen, FransLaumer, SvenSivabalan, Prabhu
Daniel, LisaLombart, CindySuprapto, Mohammad
Dhir, SanjivMaltz, Elliot N.Taghian, Mehdi
Edwards, GarethMaytorena-Sanchez, EuniceTalaulicar, Till
Eimer, ThomasMenzel, Max-PeterTaysum, Alison
Erkoyuncu, John AhmetMinassians, Henrik P.Thanacoody, Rani
Fairholm, MatthewMohr, JakkiTorres, Edwin N.
Faller, FabianMoriano, Juan A.Villani, Elisa
Farah, Paolo D.Morrison, RobertWang, Qing
Fenton, NormanMulvey, MichaelWard, Stephen
Fini, RiccardoOhemeng, FrankWibowo, Andreas
Goddard, RichardOliver, GregWilliams, Terry
Gruner, RichardParry, KenWilson-Evered, Elisabeth
Hartner-Tiefenthaler, MartinaPopoli, Paolo
Heidbreder, EvaQuesada-Pallares, Carla

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Administrative Sciences Editorial Office. Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Administrative Sciences in 2016. Adm. Sci. 2017, 7, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci7010002

AMA Style

Administrative Sciences Editorial Office. Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Administrative Sciences in 2016. Administrative Sciences. 2017; 7(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci7010002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Administrative Sciences Editorial Office. 2017. "Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Administrative Sciences in 2016" Administrative Sciences 7, no. 1: 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci7010002

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop