Why Disability Studies Needs to Take Religion Seriously
AbstractReligion and theology are central ways that many people make sense of the world and their own place in that world. But the insights of critical studies of religion, or what is sometimes positioned as religious studies as opposed to theology, are scarce in disability literature. This article suggests some of the costs of this oversight and some of the benefits of including religion. First, this article discusses how some past scholarly engagements of disability and religion have misrepresented and denigrated Judaism. Second, it argues that Judaism paints different disabilities in quite different ways, and that we cannot coherently talk about “disability in Judaism” as if it is a single thing. Third, it discusses the medical model and the social model, and shows how one Jewish woman’s writing on pain complicates how we might think about these models. In this way, the article shows how religious studies can both help remedy past mistakes and bring new insights to disability studies. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Imhoff, S. Why Disability Studies Needs to Take Religion Seriously. Religions 2017, 8, 186.
Imhoff S. Why Disability Studies Needs to Take Religion Seriously. Religions. 2017; 8(9):186.Chicago/Turabian Style
Imhoff, Sarah. 2017. "Why Disability Studies Needs to Take Religion Seriously." Religions 8, no. 9: 186.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.